Cancer Research Targets  Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Research 68, 693, February 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5012
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yarosh, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yarosh, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, T.

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

TBX3 Is Overexpressed in Breast Cancer and Represses p14ARF by Interacting with Histone Deacetylases

Will Yarosh1, Tomasa Barrientos1, Taraneh Esmailpour1, Limin Lin1, Philip M. Carpenter2, Kathryn Osann3, Hoda Anton-Culver3 and Taosheng Huang1,3,4

1 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics, 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 3 Department of Medicine, Epidemiology Division, and 4 Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, California

Requests for reprints: Taosheng Huang, Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Developmental & Cell Biology and Pathology, 314 Robert R. Sprague Hall, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. Phone: 949-824-9346; Fax: 949-824-9776; E-mail: huangts{at}uci.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TBX3 is a transcription factor of the T-box gene family. Mutations in the TBX3 gene can cause hypoplastic or absent mammary glands. Previous studies have shown that TBX3 might be associated with breast cancer. Here, we show that TBX3 is overexpressed in malignant cells of primary breast cancer tissues by immunohistochemistry. TBX3 interacts with histone deacetylases (HDAC) 1, 2, 3, and 5. TBX3 interacts with HDAC1, 2, and 3 via two distinct binding sites. However, deletion of the repression domain (amino acids 566–624) of TBX3 completely abolishes its interaction with HDAC5. Endogenous TBX3 and HDACs interaction and colocalization are found in a breast cancer cell line by coimmunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence, respectively. The functional significance of the interaction between TBX3 and HDAC is also tested in a p14ARF-luciferase reporter system. Results indicate that TBX3 represses expression of p14ARF tumor suppressor and that a HDAC inhibitor is able to reverse the TBX3 repressive function in a dosage-dependant manner. This study suggests that TBX3 may function by recruiting HDACs to the T-box binding site in the promoter region. TBX3 repression to its targets is dependent on HDAC activity. TBX3 may serve as a biomarker for breast cancer and have significant applications in both breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. [Cancer Res 2008;68(3):693–9]


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TBX3 is a T-box transcription factor that consists of a DNA binding domain (1), a nuclear localization signal, and a repression domain (2). In humans, mutations in TBX3 lead to loss of function and result in the Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome (UMS), an autosomal dominant condition that is characterized by mammary gland hypoplasia and other congenital anomalies (1, 3), suggesting that TBX3 is required for normal breast development. In mice, TBX3 haploinsufficiency does not affect the mammary placode initiation, but the branching of ductal trees in adults is significantly reduced (4). Furthermore, in homozygous Tbx3 knockout mice, the mammary glands are absent (5, 6), suggesting that altered TBX3 function may play a role in the development of breast cancer (7).

Some evidences suggest that TBX3 plays a role in breast cancer development. Previously, we have shown that TBX3 is overexpressed in a number of breast cancer cell lines (7). In the search for breast cancer biomarkers in blood, one study showed that serum TBX3 protein levels were abnormally high in patients with breast cancer (8). This suggests that serum TBX3 levels could serve as a biomarker and it warrants a more extensive evaluation of the role of TBX3 in breast cancer and the pathogenesis of this disease in humans. TBX3 has been shown to repress the expression of the tumor suppression gene p14ARF (2, 911) and the murine homologue p19ARF (11). p14ARF is a tumor suppressor shown to be aberrantly expressed and mutated in breast cancer. In addition, p14ARF inhibits human double minute 2–mediated degradation of p53. Therefore, TBX3 repression of p14ARF decreases the half-life of p53 (12). All these suggest that TBX3 plays a role in breast cancer development.

Supporting this notion, rat bladder carcinoma cell lines transfected with an antisense Tbx3 expression vector have a lower growth rate and more apoptotic cells than corresponding controls (13). Additionally, Tbx3 overexpression has been shown to immortalize mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) cells (2, 7, 9, 11). Recent exciting studies show that TBX3 is a downstream target of Wnt/β-catenin in liver cancer, and that Wnt/β-catenin can up-regulate TBX3 expression (14). The activating mutation in the β-catenin gene is associated with TBX3 overexpression in human heptocellular carcinoma and heptoblastoma. Together, these studies suggest that TBX3 promotes cell proliferation and is a negative regulator of apoptosis. Nevertheless, the role of TBX3 in primary breast cancer tissues has yet to be elucidated. In addition, how TBX3 regulates the downstream target expression is still unknown.

Gene transcription is modified by histone acetylases (15) and histone deacetylases (HDAC; ref. 16). HDACs catalyze the removal of acetyl groups from histones and thereby cause a tighter histone-DNA interaction and repression of gene transcription. HDAC proteins do not contain a DNA-binding domain and are generally recruited to DNA via DNA-binding transcription factors (17). HDACs are overexpressed in breast cancer tissues (18, 19). Recently, it was shown that p19ARF levels were strongly up-regulated by HDAC inhibitors (HDCI) in murine cells (20). Furthermore, TBX2, a homologue of TBX3, was found to selectively interact with HDAC1 and targeted HDAC1 to the p21Cip1 initiator (21). Because the p14ARF promoter is a known downstream target of TBX3, these studies prompt us to test the hypothesis that TBX3 regulates p14ARF gene expression by interacting with HDACs.

The aims of this study was to determine the clinical significance of TBX3 in breast cancer by examining TBX3 levels in primary breast cancer tissues and to test the hypothesis that TBX3 interacts with HDACs by using both in vitro and in vivo systems, including subcellular colocalization of TBX3 and HDACs by immunofluorescence and coimmunoprecipiation. The TBX3 binding sites are mapped using different mutant TBX3 constructs. The physiologic significance of the TBX3 interaction with HDACs was tested using a p14ARF promoter–driven reporter. Our results show that TBX3 expression is up-regulated in breast cancer cells where it interact and colocalized with HDACs, suggesting that HDCI could serve as effective therapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Breast cancer samples. Forty-two breast cancer cases with pathology verification and biomarkers were used. The features of the population-based breast cancer tissue samples are shown in Table 1 . These breast cancer cases were ascertained and enrolled as part of a previous study. Tissue procurement was one component of the study and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, containing tumor and adjacent normal tissue, were obtained from all cases. All the tissue blocks were sectioned and reviewed by an independent pathologist to verify the diagnosis and histology. For this project, unstained slides and H&E reference slides were used under a modified Institutional Review Board protocol (IRB# 2002-2587).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Clinicopathologic variables in the patients entered into this study

 
Plasmid construction. A full-length human TBX3 cDNA was purchased from Invitrogen. The cDNA was cloned into the EcoRI and Xho1 sites of the pOTB7 vector. The expression vectors encoding TBX3-myc, TBX3 (1–361)-myc, TBX3 (362–723)-myc, and TBX3 ({Delta}566–624)-myc fusion proteins were constructed by subcloning the TBX3 coding region and TBX3 fragments into the Cla1 and Xba1 sites of the pcDNA 3.1 vector. TBX3 and TBX3 fragments were PCR amplified with pFUultra polymerase (Stratagene). Sequences were verified using an automatic sequencer 3130xl.

Cell culture and transfection. COS-1 cells were grown in a complete medium (DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin). The cells were transfected with the control vector pcDNA3.1-myc or the expressing vectors pcDNA3.1-myc-TBX3 or pcDNA3.1-myc-TBX3 fragments using Lipofectamine according to the manufacturer's manual (Invitrogen). Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection, paraffin embedded, and subjected to immunohistochemistry. Cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis with an anti-TBX3 or anti-myc antibody.

Immunohistochemistry. Breast cancer tissues or transfected COS-1 cells embedded in a paraffin block were cut into 6-µm thick sections. The sections were deparaffinized with a xylene substitute (Clear-Rite 3 Cardinal Health) and rehydrated using decreasing concentrations of 90:5:5 ethyl:methyl:isopropyl alcohol. Pretreatment was performed using the Dako Target Retrieval Solution (pH 6) in a pressure cooker for 5 min. Immunoperoxidase reactions were performed using a Dako Autostainer Plus automated immunostainer (Dako, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the automated steps included blockage of endogenous peroxidase with DakoCytomation Dual Endogenous Enzyme Block. The sections were incubated with a 1:100 dilution of mouse anti-human TBX3; horse anti-mouse IgG diluted 1:100 was used as a secondary antibody. Incubation with DakoCytomation EnVision+ Dual Link System-horseradish peroxidase followed the primary antibody reaction. For all reactions, the chromogen was diaminobenzidine. Negative controls were treated identically, except the primary antibody was substituted with mouse immunoglobulin. The slides were examined using an Olympus BX41 light microscope and photographed using an Olympus C-5060 Wide Zoom Camera.

Scoring method for TBX3 expression. Images of immunostained breast cancer tissue slides were scored by two independent researchers not involved in any step of their preparation and without the clinical information regarding these slides. Cells of TBX3-stained tissues were scored using the criterion established by Sasaki et al. (ref. 22; Scoring method 1). Briefly, 20 mammary epithelial cells or tumor cells were randomly chosen and a score of 0 to 3 was given to reflect the intensity of nuclear staining, and another score of 0 to 3 was given to reflect the intensity of cytoplasmic staining. The sum of these two scores, 0 to 6, was also assigned to each cell to reflect overall intensities. Each tissue sample was given a score by adding the total scores of all 20 cells. The cells of TBX3-stained tissues were also scored using the criterion described by Leake et al. (ref. 12; Scoring method 2). Briefly, 20 epithelial or tumor cells were randomly chosen, and a score of 0 to 5 was given for the proportion of staining located in the nucleus: 0 for no nuclear staining, 1% for <1% nuclear staining, 2 for 1% to 10% nuclear staining, 3 for 11% to 33% nuclear staining, 4 for 34% to 66% nuclear staining, and 5 for 67% to 100% nuclear staining. A second score was given for the intensity of the stain: 0 for no staining, 1 for weak staining, 2 for moderate staining, and 3 for strong staining. The sum of these two scored 0 to 8; the sum of the two separate scores was given to each cell to reflect both localization and intensities of staining. The tissue sample was scored by adding the total scores of all 20 cells.

Data analysis of immunohistochemistry. We compared expression of TBX3 in normal and breast cancer tissue of our patients' samples using standard statistical methods. We also investigated the correlation between clinical variables and TBX3 overexpression. Correlations (Spearman or Pearson, depending on the normality of the data) were used to determine tumor stage and survival time, using expression as a continuous variable. TBX3 expression in cancer samples, relative to normal samples, was coded as a categorical variable (–1, less than in normal tissue; 0, same as in normal tissue; and +1, increased over normal tissue). The TBX3 expression levels were correlated with other clinical variables including tumor stage, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, and menopausal status (23).

Immunoprecipitation. COS-1 cells were harvested when 60% to 80% confluent. The cell lysates were precleared by incubation with prewashed protein A beads (Santa Cruz) for 2 h at 4°C. The prewashed protein A beads were then removed, and the samples were incubated with 1 µg of anti-TBX3 or anti-Myc antibody for 2 h at 4°C. Next, the samples were incubated with prewashed protein A beads for 2 h at 4°C. Afterward, the beads were washed using lysis buffer and finally resuspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer, heated to 100°C for 5 min, and analyzed by Western blotting.

Luciferase assay. Transfection was performed using lipofectamine according to the manufacturer's protocol (24). Briefly, the day before transfection, 8 x 104 Cos-1 cells were plated in each well. For each well, 1 L of Lipofectamine reagents were mixed with 300 ng of p14-Luc reporter plasmids [ref. 20; kindly provided by Professor Serrano (Spanish National Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain)] and 100 ng of the pRL-TK plasmid (Promega) in serum-free Opti-MEM medium and then added to the respective wells. The cells were harvested after 48 h, and firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase assays were performed using the Promega Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System. The activities of the luciferase constructs were normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity of the pRL-TK construct. All transfections were done in triplicate and repeated at least thrice.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TBX3 overexpression in primary breast cancer tissues. Previously, we quantified TBX3 mRNA in 30 breast cancer cell lines and found that TBX3 was overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer cell lines. In addition, we showed that TBX3 was able to immortalize MEF cells. To translate what we discovered in breast cancer cell lines and MEF cells, we tested if TBX3 was overexpressed in primary breast cancer tissues. These experiments relied on the sensitivity and specificity of an anti-TBX3 antibody, which was raised against a recombinant TBX3 COOH-terminal fragment expressed in bacteria. To examine the quality of our anti-TBX3 antibody, we tested its performance using three different applications: immunohistochemistry, Western blotting, and immunoprecipitation. COS-1 cells were used for immunohistochemical analysis because they have a very low level of endogenous TBX3 (Fig. 1A, left ). Next, the COS-1 cells were transfected with a TBX3 encoding vector (pcDNA3 myc-TBX3), and ~40% of the cells produced a very specific signal (Fig. 1A, right).


Figure 1
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. The anti-TBX3 antibody specifically detects TBX3 in COS-1 cells expressing TBX3. COS-1 cells were transfected with the control vector pcDNA3-myc (A, left) and the pcDNA3-myc-TBX3 vector (A, right). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were harvested and paraffin embedded. The block was cut into 6-µm sections, and the sections were subjected to immunohistochemical staining with the anti-TBX3 antibody. Note that COS-1 cells express low-levels of endogenous TBX3 (A, left), whereas the ~40% of the COS-1 cells transfected with pcDNA-myc-TBX3 show strong signals (A, right). B, expression of a myc-TBX3 fusion protein in COS-1 cells. Lane 1, full-length TBX3 (TBX3 1–732). Lane 2, an NH2-terminal fragment of TBX3 (TBX3 1–361). Lane 3, a COOH-terminal fragment of TBX3 (TBX3 361–732). Lane 4, full-length TBX3 with deletion of the repression domain ({Delta}566–624). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were lysed and used for Western blot analysis with an anti-myc (B, left) or the anti-TBX3 antibody (2, right). Note that the anti-TBX3 antibody recognizes full-length TBX3 (B, right, lane 1), the terminal fragment of TBX3 (B, right, lane 3), TBX3 with a functional domain deletion (B, right, lane 4), and a TBX3 degradation product (*). The pattern is very similar to that of the anti-myc antibody (B, left). Because the anti-TBX3 antibody was generated against a recombinant COOH-terminal fragment of TBX3, it does not detect the NH2-terminal fragment of TBX3 (TBX3 1–361; B, right, lane 2). There are no specific bands in lane 2 (B, right). C, TBX3 staining in primary human breast cancer tissue. Breast cancer cells have high levels of TBX3 (C, left). Right, comparisons of TBX3 staining in normal breast epithelial cells (N) and adjacent invasive carcinoma cells (T) from the same patient. Tumor cells show both overexpression and mislocalization of TBX3 compared with normal breast epithelial cells. The expression of TBX3 is restricted to the breast tissue epithelial cells, and we found little or background TBX3 signal in noncancer or nonepithelial cells. T, tumor; N, normal; black arrow, nucleus; white arrow, cytoplasm.

 
Next, the anti-TBX3 antibody was tested by Western blotting. COS-1 cells expressing different TBX3 fragments fused with the myc epitope were used for Western blot analysis. The membranes were incubated with an anti-myc (Fig. 1B, left) or the anti-TBX3 antibody (Fig. 1B, right). As shown in Fig. 1B, both antibodies produced very similar patterns, except for lane 2, consistent with the fact that the TBX3 antibody was raised against the COOH-terminal fragment of TBX3 and can only recognize full-length TBX3 (lane 1), the TBX3 COOH terminal (lane 3), and full-length TBX3 with the functional domain deleted (lane 4), but not the NH2-terminal fragment. Significantly, there was no nonspecific background when the NH2-terminal fragment of TBX3 was used (lane 2). Endogenous TBX3 was detected in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and in a cell line ectopically expressing TBX3, by Western blotting (data not shown).

TBX3 expression in primary breast cancer tissues could be examined at the mRNA or protein level. However, the primary tumor tissues represented a mixture of both normal and malignant cells, and therefore, only a subpopulation of tumor cells overexpressed TBX3, which made the interpretation of mRNA levels challenging. To overcome this obstacle, we performed immunohistochemistry to allow better analysis of TBX3 protein levels and subcellular localization in individual cells. This method also allows us to monitor more sensitive protein levels. We found that TBX3 levels in the malignant cells (T) were much higher in nucleus compared with the normal breast epithelial cells (N; Fig. 1C). We used two different scoring systems to characterize the normal and tumor tissue of 42 patients. The two scoring systems produced very similar data. Results were scored with method one. We found that malignant cells of primary breast cancer tissue had higher TBX3 levels than normal breast epithelial cells in both nucleus and cytoplasm (P < 0.01).

TBX3 is mislocalized in primary breast cancer tissues. In addition to TBX3 expression levels, we noticed another striking difference between the malignant and control mammary epithelial cells. Malignant cells (T) displayed unusually high TBX3 levels in the cytoplasm compared with normal breast epithelial cells (N); little or no TBX3 was detected in cytoplasm of normal breast epithelial cells (Fig. 1C). We further investigated this observation by analyzing our immunohistochemistry scoring results in greater detail (data not shown). Both scoring methods indicated that the cytoplasmic TBX3 levels were increased in malignant cells compared with normal breast epithelial cells (P < 0.01). To determine if this observation was the result of an overall increase in TBX3 levels, we compared the levels of TBX3 in the cytoplasm to the levels of TBX3 in the nucleus in both cell types. We also found that the ratio of TBX3 levels in the cytoplasm/nucleus was also increased in malignant cells compared with normal breast epithelial cells (P < 0.01). Both of these findings indicate that TBX3 is mislocalized in the malignant cells of primary breast cancer tissues.

TBX3 interacts with HDAC1, 2, 3, and 5. Recently, it was shown that a TBX3 homologue, TBX2, specifically binds to HDAC1 and targets HDAC1 to the p21Cip1 initiator (21). Another recent publication shows that HDCI specifically increase activation of the p14ARF promoter (20), a known downsteam target of TBX3. Together, these studies suggest that TBX3, in concert with HDACs, regulates p14ARF gene expression. To test if TBX3 interacts with any member of the HDAC family, we performed TBX3 and HDAC cotransfection and coimmunoprecipitation assay. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with Myc-tagged TBX3 and Flag-HDAC1, Flag-HDAC2, Flag-HDAC4, Flag-HDAC5, Flag-HDAC7, or Flag-HDAC9. As shown in Fig. 2A and B , we found that TBX3 interacts with HDAC1, 2, 3, and 5.


Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. TBX3 interacts with HDAC1, 2, 3, and 5. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with a control vector only or the TBX3 expressing vector pCDNA Myc-TBX3 plus the indicated HDAC vectors (1, 2, 3, A; 4, 5, 7, 9, B). Immunoprecipitation (IP) assays were performed using a rabbit anti-myc antibody followed by Western blot analysis (input, 5%) using a mouse anti-flag antibody (top). TBX3 and HDAC expression were confirmed with Western blots using a rabbit anti-myc antibody (bottom) and anti-Flag antibody, respectively (middle).

 
Identification of the TBX3 domain responsible for HDACs interaction. To identify the region of TBX3 that is required for TBX3-HDAC interaction, we made deleted TBX3 constructs, which could be tested for HDAC interaction by coimmunoprecipitation. We started by testing the NH2-terminal fragment of TBX3 (amino acids 1–361), which includes the T-box domain. A second fragment starts at amino acid 361 and ends at the COOH terminus, without a T-box domain but has a repression domain. We also made a construct with a deletion of TBX3 repression domain (amino acids 566–624). The HDAC and the truncated TBX3 constructs were coexpressed in COS-7 cells and tested for interaction by immunoprecipitation.

As shown in Fig. 3A to D , TBX3 interacts with HDAC1, 2, and 3 with NH2-terminal (amino acids 1–361) and the COOH-terminal region (amino acids 361–732), respectively, suggesting that the interaction is via multiple interaction domains, at least one in the NH2-terminal (amino acids 1–361) and another in the COOH-terminal region (amino acids 361–732). However, although HDAC1 still interacts with TBX3 that does not contain the repression domain (Fig. 3A), HDAC2 interaction is significantly decreased when this domain is removed (Fig. 3B). This suggests that the interaction domains between HDAC1 and 2 with TBX3 are different. In contrast to the data showing HDAC1 and 2 interaction, TBX3 NH2 terminal (1–361) is not sufficient for interaction with HDAC5. However, the COOH terminus mutant (361–732) strongly interacts with HDAC5. Furthermore, deletion of the repression domain (amino acids 566–624) completely abolishes TBX3-HDAC5 interaction (Fig. 3D, top). This suggests that TBX3-mediated repression is HDAC5 dependent. Our results are consistent with previous data showing that HDACs interacts with their cofactors through multiple domains in different manners.


Figure 3
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Truncated TBX3 proteins interact with HDAC1, 2, 3, and HDAC5. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with vector only, Myc-TBX3, or various TBX3 deletion constructs, and the indicated HDACs. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the myc-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated from the cell lysates using a rabbit anti-myc antibody and protein A agarose beads (Santa Cruz). To determine if the immunoprecipitated Myc-TBX3 proteins brought down the flag-tagged HDACs, we did Western blot analysis using a mouse anti-flag antibody (SIGMA). A to D, immunoprecipitations performed using a rabbit anti-myc antibody, followed by Western blotting of the precipitates using a mouse anti-Flag antibody (top). To confirm myc-TBX3 and HDAC expression, input cell lysates (5%) were tested by Western blotting with the rabbit anti-myc antibody and anti-flag antibody (middle and bottom), respectively.

 
Interaction between endogenous TBX3 and HDAC in MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Our results show that TBX3 interacts with HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 5 when they are coexpressed ectopically in COS-7 cells. To examine if this interaction occurs between the endogenous TBX3 and HDAC proteins in breast cancer cell lines, we performed immunoprecipitations with the anti-TBX3 antibody and analyzed the immunoprecipitants by Western analysis with anti-HDAC antibodies, using MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were used because they are the most commonly used breast cancer cell line. It is also been previously shown that TBX3, HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 5 are expressed in this particular cell line. As shown in Fig. 4 , HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 5 coimmunoprecipitates with TBX3. This result suggests that endogenous TBX3 interacts with HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 5. We further confirmed the endogenous TBX3-HDAC interaction in MCF-7 cells using immunofluorescence. Formaldehyde-fixed MCF-7 cells were probed using a mouse anti-TBX3 and a rabbit anti-HDAC antibodies. A nonspecific antiserum was used as a negative control (data not shown). The slides were visualized using isotype-matched Alexa Fluor 594 (Red)– and Alexa Fluor 488 (Green)–conjugated secondary antibodies. TBX3 colocalizes with HDAC1 and 5 (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. TBX3 interacts with HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 5 in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. MCF-7 cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with an anti-human TBX3 antibody and a nonspecific antiserum. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blot (input, 5%) with anti-HDAC1, anti-HDAC2, anti-HDAC3, and anti-HDAC5 antibodies as indicated on the top. *, the specific HDAC bands. The molecular markers are shown on the left.

 
The interactions between TBX3 and HDACs are physiologically important for tumor repressor p14ARF expression. Our results suggest that TBX3 interacts with HDACs and represses its downstream gene expression. HDACs requirement for TBX3 regulation of p14ARF was tested in a p14ARF promoter–luciferase reporter system. The p14ARF promoter with a binding site for TBX3 linked to a luciferase reporter was cotransfected with a Myc-TBX3 construct into COS-7 cells in the presence or absence of the HDCI sodium butyrate and Trichostatin A. The luciferase assay was carried out using the reporter system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 48 h, luciferase activities were measured. The transcription was normalized to Rennilla luciferase activity. As shown in Fig. 5 , TBX3 is able to inhibit p14ARF expression (Fig. 5, lane 2). When pcDNA-Myc-TBX3 is cotransfected with the p14ARF promoter–luciferase reporter in the presence of increasing concentrations of the HDCI, sodium butyrate (A), or Trichostatin A (B). The inhibition of TBX3 to luciferase activities is reversed in a dosage-dependent manner, indicating that TBX3 inhibition to p14ARF promoter–luciferase is HDAC dependent.


Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. TBX3 regulation of p14ARF gene expression in a HDACs-dependent manner. COS-1 cells were cotransfected with a p14ARF promoter–luciferase reporter and pcDNA-Myc-TBX3 in the presence of variable concentration of HDCI sodium butyrate (NaB; A) and Trichostatin A (TSA; B). In this experiment, Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) was used for transfection by following the manufacturer's protocol. The luciferase assay was carried out using the reporter system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 48 h of transfection, cell lysates were used to measure the luciferase activity. Luciferase activity was normalized to Rennilla. All experiments were performed in triplicate and analyzed using a Student's t test.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutations in TBX3 cause UMS with features of mammary gland hypoplasia (1, 3). We found that TBX3 was overexpressed in malignant cells, compared with the matched normal mammary epithelial cells. Our results are consistent with previous studies showing that TBX3 was overexpressed in breast cancer cell lines. We also found high levels of TBX3 in the cytoplasm. The elevated cytoplasmic TBX3 protein levels in our result suggest that TBX3 "leaks" into the cytoplasm and, subsequently, enters the blood stream from the tumor tissue, which results in elevated serum levels in cancer patients (8). This result further suggests that TBX3 is involved in breast cancer and can serve as a biomarker for breast cancer.

Previously, it was shown that TBX3 combined with Myc or oncogenic Ras can lead to efficient transformation of MEF (9). In vitro, TBX3 can immortalize and transform MEF cells (7), probably by repressing p14ARF gene expression (10, 11). Overexpression of TBX3 may affect the degradation of p53 via p14ARF and allow breast epithelial cells to undergo additional rounds of cell division and even develop into breast cancer cells, suggesting that TBX3 may promote breast cancer by inhibiting p14ARF. However, the mechanism is unknown. In our study, we showed that TBX3 interacted with HDAC1, 2, 3, and 5. Because TBX3 is overexpressed in breast cancer cell lines and HDACs were also found to be overexpressed in many malignant tissues, including breast cancer tissues, HDACs and TBX3 may work together and play an important role in breast cancer development. There is increasing evidence that each HDAC plays a specific role (16, 2527). It was found that HDAC1 was expressed at significantly higher levels in HER2 negative and ER-{alpha}/PR positive. HDAC1 mRNA levels correlated with prognosis (19). The specific roles of HDAC2, 3, and 5 in breast cancer is still unknown. HDACs may form a complex and interact with TBX3. HDACI have recently been tested for their ability to serve as therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer, showing significant activity against tumors. HDACIs can selectively alter genes expression (25, 28). HDACIs may execute the anticancer effect partially through the TBX3-HDAC interaction. Indeed, we showed that TBX3 regulation of gene expression is HDAC dependent, and HDACIs can reverse the regulation of TBX3 on p14ARF, further suggesting that the TBX3-HDACs interaction is important in breast cancer development.

TBX3-HDAC interaction can explain why T-box genes share a very similar T-box DNA-binding domain and bind to the same or similar synthetic oligonucleotides in vitro. Our result suggests that the functions of T-box genes are diverse by interaction with their cofactors, such as HDACs. Elucidation of TBX3-HDACs interaction enhances our understanding of TBX3 function, particularly in breast cancer and mammary gland development. Finally, we would like to point our that although our result showed that TBX3 represses p14ARF expression by interacting with HDACs, there is no evidence to suggest that p53 or p14ARF knockout is able to rescue the embryo lethality of the homozygous TBX3 mutation (4). This suggests that TBX3 function is more diverse than we expected. TBX3 might regulate other pathways involved in embryo development.


    Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: NIH (R03CA110034 and 1R01 CA121876), the California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (CRCC-3338), and The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (BCTR-133006; T. Huang). T. Barrientos was supported by NIH institutional training grant T32HD07029.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the patients for participating in our study and the physicians for referring the patients to us, and Drs. Eric Olson and Rhonda Bassel-Duby, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, for their stimulating discussion and several of HDAC expressing vectors.

We thank Drs. Edward Seto (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute) for providing HDAC3 construct and Bogi Andersen for critical reading of this manuscript, and Tracey Kingsley who performed the immunoperoxidase reactions. The immunohistochemistry was performed at the University of California, Irvine Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center Translational Pathology Core Facility.


    Footnotes
 
Note: W. Yarosh and T. Barrientos contributed equally to this work.

Current address for T. Barrientos: Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Received 8/23/07. Revised 11/28/07. Accepted 11/28/07.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bamshad M, Lin RC, Law DJ, et al. Mutations in human TBX3 alter limb, apocrine and genital development in ulnar-mammary syndrome. Nat Genet 1997;16:311–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Carlson H, Ota S, Campbell CE, Hurlin PJ. A dominant repression domain in Tbx3 mediates transcriptional repression and cell immortalization: relevance to mutations in Tbx3 that cause ulnar-mammary syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:2403–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bamshad M, Le T, Watkins WS, et al. The spectrum of mutations in TBX3: genotype/phenotype relationship in ulnar-mammary syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1999;64:1550–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Jerome-Majewska LA, Jenkins GP, Ernstoff E, Zindy F, Sherr CJ, Papaioannou VE. Tbx3, the ulnar-mammary syndrome gene, and Tbx2 interact in mammary gland development through a p19Arf/p53-independent pathway. Dev Dyn 2005;234:922–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Davenport TG, Jerome-Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE. Mammary gland, limb and yolk sac defects in mice lacking Tbx3, the gene mutated in human ulnar mammary syndrome. Development 2003;130:2263–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rowley M, Grothey E, Couch FJ. The role of Tbx2 and Tbx3 in mammary development and tumorigenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004;9:109–18.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Fan W, Huang X, Chen C, Gray J, Huang T. TBX3 and its isoform TBX3+2a are functionally distinctive in inhibition of senescence and are overexpressed in a subset of breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 2004;64:5132–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lomnytska M, Dubrovska A, Hellman U, Volodko N, Souchelnytskyi S. Increased expression of cSHMT, Tbx3 and utrophin in plasma of ovarian and breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2006;118:412–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Carlson H, Ota S, Song Y, Chen Y, Hurlin PJ. Tbx3 impinges on the p53 pathway to suppress apoptosis, facilitate cell transformation and block myogenic differentiation. Oncogene 2002;21:3827–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Lingbeek ME, Jacobs JJ, van Lohuizen M. The T-box repressors TBX2 and TBX3 specifically regulate the tumor suppressor gene p14ARF via a variant T-site in the initiator. J Biol Chem 2002;277:26120–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brummelkamp TR, Kortlever RM, Lingbeek M, et al. TBX-3, the gene mutated in Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome, is a negative regulator of p19ARF and inhibits senescence. J Biol Chem 2002;277:6567–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Leake R, Barnes D, Pinder S, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of steroid receptors in breast cancer: a working protocol. UK Receptor Group, UK NEQAS, The Scottish Breast Cancer Pathology Group, and The Receptor and Biomarker Study Group of the EORTC. J Clin Pathol 2000;53:634–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ito A, Asamoto M, Hokaiwado N, Takahashi S, Shirai T. Tbx3 expression is related to apoptosis and cell proliferation in rat bladder both hyperplastic epithelial cells and carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 2005;219:105–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Renard CA, Labalette C, Armengol C, et al. Tbx3 is a downstream target of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and a critical mediator of {β}-catenin survival functions in liver cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:901–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Verdone L, Caserta M, Di Mauro E. Role of histone acetylation in the control of gene expression. Biochem Cell Biol 2005;83:344–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Glozak MA, Sengupta N, Zhang X, Seto E. Acetylation and deacetylation of non-histone proteins. Gene 2005;363:15–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Cress WD, Seto E. Histone deacetylases, transcriptional control, and cancer. J Cell Physiol 2000;184:1–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Glozak MA, Seto E. Histone deacetylases and cancer. Oncogene 2007;26:5420–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zhang Z, Yamashita H, Toyama T, et al. Quantitation of HDAC1 mRNA expression in invasive carcinoma of the breast*. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;94:11–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Matheu A, Klatt P, Serrano M. Regulation of the INK4a/ARF locus by histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Biol Chem 2005;280:42433–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vance KW, Carreira S, Brosch G, Goding CR. Tbx2 is overexpressed and plays an important role in maintaining proliferation and suppression of senescence in melanomas. Cancer Res 2005;65:2260–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sasaki T, Ryo A, Uemura H, et al. An immunohistochemical scoring system of prolyl isomerase Pin1 for predicting relapse of prastate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Pathol Res Pract 2006;202:357–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, et al. Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1566–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sun G, Lewis LE, Huang X, Nguyen Q, Price C, Huang T. TBX5, a gene mutated in Holt-Oram syndrome, is regulated through a GC box and T-box binding elements (TBEs). J Cell Biochem 2004;92:189–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Dokmanovic M, Marks PA. Prospects: histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Cell Biochem 2005;96:293–304.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Puri PL, Iezzi S, Stiegler P, et al. Class I histone deacetylases sequentially interact with MyoD and pRb during skeletal myogenesis. Mol Cell 2001;8:885–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Zhang X, Ozawa Y, Lee H, et al. Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity is regulated by interaction with protein serine/threonine phosphatase 4. Genes Dev 2005;19:827–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mei S, Ho AD, Mahlknecht U. Role of histone deacetylase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer [review]. Int J Oncol 2004;25:1509–19.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Rodriguez, E. Aladowicz, L. Lanfrancone, and C. R. Goding
Tbx3 Represses E-Cadherin Expression and Enhances Melanoma Invasiveness
Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 68(19): 7872 - 7881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yarosh, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yarosh, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online