| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
1 Department of Urology and 2 Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology and University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Requests for reprints: Mark L. Day, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, 6219 CCGC, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0944. Phone: 734-647-9968; Fax: 734-647-9271; E-mail: mday{at}umich.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v integrin and CD44. Furthermore, matrix metalloproteinase 9 secretion and activity were abrogated in response to ADAM15 reduction. In an in vitro model of vascular invasion, loss of ADAM15 reduced PC-3 adhesion to, and migration through, vascular endothelial cell monolayers. Using an SCID mouse model of human prostate cancer metastasis, we found that the loss of ADAM15 significantly attenuated the metastatic spread of PC-3 cells to bone. Taken together, these data strongly support a functional role for ADAM15 in prostate tumor cell interaction with vascular endothelium and the metastatic progression of human prostate cancer. [Cancer Res 2008;68(4):1092–9] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The less studied ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) family of membrane metalloproteinases may also support tumor progression by modulating key physiologic cell surface proteins such as membrane-anchored growth factors and their complementary receptors, cell adhesion molecules, and integrins (4). The ADAM family is composed of 40 members, of which 13 members are catalytically active. These catalytically active members contain a metalloproteinase domain that is implicated in growth factor shedding and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation. ADAM17 has been reported to process pro–tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, TNF receptors, interleukin-6 receptor, and amphiregulin (5, 6), and ADAM9, ADAM10, ADAM12, and ADAM17 are believed to cleave the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligand, HB-EGF, leading to the transactivation of EGFR (7). ADAM family members have also been shown to cleave different cell adhesion molecules such as N-cadherin (8). Expression of N-cadherin in human tumor cells is usually associated with malignant progression (9). Cell surface N-cadherin supports heterotypic interaction between migrating cancer cells and other cells of the tumor microenvironment such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells to support cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis.
Another physiologic feature of ADAMs uses the disintegrin domain to mediate integrin-ECM interactions. Several ADAM family members, including ADAM15, have been shown to bind to specific integrin molecules, suggesting roles in cellular adhesion and tumor cell-ECM interactions (10). Although the ADAMs have been the focus of rigorous research in many biological processes, such as oocyte fertilization, neurogenesis, myogenesis, and growth factor shedding (11, 12), they have only recently been studied in the context of human tumorigenesis (13–15). For example, ADAM9 expression has been associated with the incident of low-grade prostate cancer formation in mice (16); however, the precise role of the ADAMs in malignant processes remains largely unknown.
A number of proteases, including members of the ADAM family, are thought to play regulatory roles in the processes of angiogenesis and neovascularization. ADAMs have been implicated in the processing of several key signaling components of inflammation and angiogenesis as well as adhesion molecules that comprise endothelial adherens junctions, including vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin, PCAM-1, and integrins (17). A novel role for ADAM15 in endothelial adhesion was suggested by the observation that ADAM15 colocalized in endothelial cell junctions with VE-cadherin (18). Additionally, Horiuchi and colleagues (19) provided a compelling argument for the role of ADAM15 in pathologic neovascularization using a model of prematurity of retinopathy in mice. Further supporting ADAM15 function in endothelial regulation is the evidence that ADAM15 binds the endothelial integrins
5β1 and
vβ3 via an RGD motif contained within its disintegrin domain (20, 21). Taken together, these studies suggest that ADAM15 is a potential but unexplored component of tumor cell–endothelial cell interaction that may play a role in tumor angiogenesis and/or metastasis.
Although a role for ADAM15 in tumor vasculature may be emerging, very little is known concerning the contribution of ADAM15 to tumor initiation and progression. Located on chromosome 1q21, the gene encoding ADAM15 maps to a region of documented amplification associated with the metastatic progression of human cancers, including prostate, breast, ovarian, colon, and melanoma (22–24). We have recently completed the first comprehensive expression profile of ADAM15 in human prostate cancer by using both cDNA microarray and multitumor array technology. This study showed significant increases of ADAM15 expression in multiple adenocarcinomas and a highly significant correlation with the metastatic progression of human prostate cancer (25). Based on previous work characterizing the catalytic metalloproteinase and disintegrin domains of ADAM15, we anticipated that ADAM15 may serve multiple functions in the metastatic progression of prostate tumors through disruption or degradation of the extracellular matrix, via its disintegrin domain, as well as proteolytic processing of key membrane-bound molecules via the metalloproteinase domain.
To specifically elucidate the role of ADAM15 in prostate cancer progression, we developed a stable short hairpin RNA (shRNA)–mediated knockdown of ADAM15 in the highly malignant prostate cancer line PC-3. We have established that the reduction of ADAM15 expression abolishes the malignant characteristics of this cell line in vitro and in vivo and is associated with alterations of metastatic-associated cell surface proteins. To our knowledge, this study is the first to provide functional evidence that ADAM15 plays an important role in the metastatic progression of human prostate cancer.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of shADAM15 PC-3 and ADAM15-overexpressing LNCaP cell lines. ADAM15-specific knockdown in PC-3Luc cells and the vector control that features a scrambled sequence that is designed to control for off-target effects were generated as described previously (27). The forward and complementary targeting sequences for ADAM15 were 5'-AACCCAGCTGTCACCCTCGAA-3' and 5'-TTCGAGGGTGACAGCTGGGTT-3'. The shRNA cassette also featured a TTCAAGAGA loop situated between the sense and reverse complementary targeting sequences and a TTTTT terminator at the 3' end.
To generate ADAM15-overexpressing LNCaP cells, ADAM15 cDNA was tagged with hemagglutinin at the COOH terminus and transfected into LNCaP cells lines as described previously (25).
Protein isolation and Western blotting. Cells were harvested by mechanical disruption with cell scrapers followed by gentle centrifugation. Cell pellets were then lysed in appropriate volumes of lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris (pH 8), 120 mmol/L NaCl, 5% NP40, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 100 µg/mL phenylmethysulfonyl fluoride, 50 µg/mL aprotinin, 50 µg/mL leupeptin, and 1.0 mmol/L sodium orthovanidate] for 1 h on ice. Tissues were briefly washed in PBS and homogenized in lysis buffer on ice for 20 s with a Tissue Tearor. Cellular debris was then pelleted by centrifugation, and supernatants were collected and quantitated using a Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of protein were then separated on precast Tris-glycine SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Novex) and transferred to Hybond nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were then blocked, probed, and developed as previously described (28). Primary antibodies were obtained as follows: actin, luciferase, GFP, and N-cadherin (Sigma); ADAM10, ADAM15, and
v integrin (Chemicon); and ADAM17 and CD44 (R&D Systems).
In vivo tumorigenesis assay. PC3Luc cells were trypsinized, washed twice with PBS, collected, and resuspended in PBS; the viability of collected cells was tested by staining with trypan blue. To establish PC3Luc tumor xenografts in mice, 6-week-old C57BL/6 severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice were injected s.c. in the right flank with 1 x 107 vector or shADAM15 PC3Luc cells in 100 µL of PBS. Tumor volume was monitored weekly by external measurements with a caliper and calculated as V = (L2 x l) / 2, where L and l represent the smaller and the larger tumor diameter. The observations were ended for ethical reasons after 8 weeks due to large tumor burden in vector control mice. Animals were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions with ad libitum food and water in the University of Michigan animal housing facilities. At this time, animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation followed by induction of a bilateral pneumothorax and tumors were immediately frozen in dry ice or fixed in formalin.
In vitro migration assay. Cell migration was evaluated by using the scratch wound assay; vector or shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells were cultured for 2 to 3 days to form a tight cell monolayer. Cells were then serum starved for 16 h. Following the serum starvation, the cell monolayer was wounded with a 10 µL plastic pipette tip. The remaining cells were washed twice with culture medium to remove cell debris and incubated at 37°C with normal serum-containing culture medium. At the indicated times, migrating cells at the wound front were photographed using a Nikon inverted microscope (Thornwood). The cleared area at each time point was measured as a percentage of the cleared area at time 0 h using NIH Image J software.
Cell adhesion assay. Collagen I, collagen IV, fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin, or bovine serum albumin–coated 96-well plates were obtained from Chemicon and adhesion was performed per manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were detached using a cell dissociation buffer (Sigma), washed, and plated at 2.5 x 104 per well in culture medium. Adhesion was allowed to occur for 1 h. Nonadherent cells were removed by gentle washing with warm PBS. Cells were fixed, stained, and solubilized for absorbance reading at 550 nm using a VersaMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices) and Softmax Pro Software.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. Cell surface integrin and CD44 receptor expression was monitored by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Briefly, cells were detached using cell dissociation buffer (Sigma) and resuspended in PBS. After washing twice with PBS, cells were incubated with primary antibodies (
v and CD44) for 1 h on ice. Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with Phar Red–conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) for 1 h at 4°C. Cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 7.5% formaldehyde for 5 min at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice and resuspended in PBS and analyzed using a FACSVantage SE three-laser High-Speed Cell Sorter (BD Biosciences) with CellQuest Pro Software. Isotype IgG and secondary antibodies alone were used as controls.
Substrate gel electrophoresis. MMP9 secretion and activity were assessed using gelatin zymography. Vector or shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells were grown up to subconfluency and then serum starved in serum-depleted medium for 0, 24, and 48 h. At each time point, conditioned medium was collected by spinning the samples at 2,000 rpm for 15 min to pellet any cell debris. The supernatant was collected and 3 mL of it were concentrated using Amicon Ultra concentrators (Millipore) according to manufacturer's directions. Equal volume of the retentate was loaded on a gelatin zymogram and developed according to manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).
Transendothelial interaction and migration. The endothelial-epithelial interactions assay was performed as previously described (29). Briefly, human microvascular endothelial cells (HDMEC) or human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were grown to full confluence in six-well dishes. Vector or shADAM15 PC-3Luc epithelial cells (2 x 105) were added in 1.8 mL of 50:50 mixture of the EGM-2/RPMI 1640 culture medium in triplicate. The unbound fraction were collected at 0, 5, and 20 min and cells were counted. Data were calculated as the percent of bound epithelial cell fraction by subtracting the unbound fraction from the total cells (at the zero time point calculated for each cell line).
The transendothelial migration (TEM) assay was performed as previously described (30). Briefly, HUVECs were plated on 3-µm transwells to confluency. Vector or shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells (3.8 x 104) were added onto the confluent HUVEC monolayer for 4 and 8 h. Nonadherent PC-3Luc cells and endothelial cells were removed by Q-tip swab from the top filter. The transwell filter was stained with crystal violet, solubilized in 10% acetic acid, and quantified by fluorometric analysis using a VersaMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices) and Softmax Pro Software.
N-cadherin proteolysis. For the in vitro proteolysis of N-cadherin, ADAM15 was isolated through immunoprecipitation using a hemagglutinin-specific antibody (Millipore) from LNCaP whole-cell lysates. Similarly, N-cadherin was isolated through immunoprecipitation using an N-cadherin–specific antibody (Sigma) from whole-cell lysates of N-cadherin–expressing PC-3Luc cells. Isolated ADAM15 and N-cadherin were resuspended in equal amounts of ice-cold PBS (calcium- and magnesium-free, Life Technologies), then mixed together at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio and incubated for the designated time points at 37°C. At the end of each time point, the reaction was stopped with the addition of reducing loading buffer and boiling. Samples were then loaded on SDS-PAGE for protein analysis. Levels of soluble N-cadherin in conditioned medium were monitored via N-cadherin immunoprecipitation from dilute conditioned medium samples generated using the MMP9 zymography protocol. Isotype IgG was also used for the immunoprecipitation control.
Intracardiac metastasis model. Six- to seven-week-old C57BL/6 SCID mice were anesthetized with 1.75% isofluorane/air anesthesia. Cells (2 x 105) in a volume of 100 µL of sterile PBS were injected into the left ventricle using a 25-gauge needle. The animals were then monitored daily. Mice were imaged using the University of Michigan Small Animal Imaging Resource facility. Images were collected on a cooled CCD IVIS system with 50-mm lens (Xenogen Corp.). The LivingImage software was used for analysis of all animals (Xenogen). Before imaging, each mouse received an i.p. injection containing 100 µL of a solution containing 40 mg/mL Luciferin dissolved in PBS. These mice were imaged at the indicated time intervals to assess the growth and metastasis of the luciferase-positive cells. At the termination of each experiment, mice were anesthetized, sacrificed, and a full necropsy was carried out. Organs of interest were dissected out, weighed, and used for histologic analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
shRNA-mediated knockdown of ADAM15 reduces PC-3 tumorigenicity. To assess the role of ADAM15 in prostate cancer progression, we inhibited the expression of ADAM15 using a shRNA-mediated approach in the malignant prostate cancer cell line, PC-3. Three stable ADAM15 shRNA-mediated knockdown lines, shADAM15-1, 2, 3 (Fig. 1A ), were established using a lentiviral construct to transduce the shRNA into the luciferase-tagged PC-3 cells (PC-3Luc). The shRNA construct eliminated both the precursor and mature forms of ADAM15 protein in the PC-3Luc shADAM15 cells compared with the parental and vector control cells. Off-target effects of the shRNA on other genes, including relatives of ADAM15, ADAM10, and ADAM17, were assessed and were shown to be unaltered in the ADAM15 knockdown lines confirming the specificity of the shRNA for ADAM15.
|
6-fold increase in tumor volume compared with the shADAM15 PC-3Luc cell line (Fig. 1B and C). H&E histology and anti-luciferase immunohistochemistry verified the presence of prostate-derived PC-3Luc cells (Supplementary Fig. S1A and B). Reduction of ADAM15 in PC-3 cells attenuates cell migration and adhesion. Cellular migration is a characteristic of metastatic tumors. To assess whether ADAM15 down-regulation in PC-3Luc cells reduces cell migration, we performed a wound-healing migration assay (31). Vector or shADAM15 PC-3Luc cell monolayers were abraded with a pipette tip, stimulated with serum-containing growth medium, and monitored over 24 h. Microscopic examination at 3 and 6 h revealed a significant delay in the wound closure rate of shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells compared with the vector control cell line that had closed the wound channel by 3 h (Fig. 2A ). This finding was corroborated by use of a colloidal gold assay, which showed a decrease in random motility of the shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells compared with the vector control PC-3Luc cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). Interaction between cell adhesion molecules (CAM) and their complementary ECM targets support cell migration. ADAM15 has been shown to interact with several integrins, which, in turn, bind their complementary ECM substrates to mediate cellular adhesion and migration (20, 21). To assess the role of ADAM15 in cell adhesion to ECM substrates, vector or shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells were plated on plastic coated with collagen I, collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin. The shADAM15 cell line had a significant reduction in their ability to adhere to fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin compared with vector control (Fig. 2B). Both vector and shADAM15 cells adhered equally unto collagen I and IV (data not shown).
|
|
v integrin and the CD44 receptor are significantly down-regulated at the cell surface in response to ADAM15 knockdown (Fig. 4A
). Unlike cell surface integrins, whose expression is difficult to assess by Western blot analysis, CD44 protein expression was nearly depleted in shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells as well as in the shADAM15-derived tumors, shown in Fig. 1, compared with vector control (Fig. 4B). This finding is supported by a previous study showing a correlation between the tumorigenicity of prostate cancer cell lines and CD44 expression (34). Due to CD44 regulation of MMP9 secretion and activity (35), we evaluated the levels of MMP9 in vector and shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells using gelatin zymography and found dramatic reduction in both MMP9 secretion and activity in response to ADAM15 loss (Fig. 4C). To rule out the involvement of ADAM15 in gelatin degradation, purified wild-type ADAM15 was analyzed for gelatinase activity using gelatin zymography. Wild-type ADAM15 did not digest the gelatin substrate (data not shown).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have recently completed the first comprehensive study of ADAM15 expression in human cancer. Using the Oncomine database, we examined the cDNA expression arrays of published studies examining normal tissue verses tumor in a number of adenocarcinomas. Using this database and the associated statistical software, we found that ADAM15 was up-regulated in multiple adenocarcinomas (25). In addition, we have examined the expression of ADAM15 in 23 independent adenocarcinoma cell lines representing melanoma and tumors of the prostate, breast, and colon and in all cases have observed high-level expression of activated ADAM15 protein (data not shown). The chromosomal location of ADAM15 on 1q21, a region of specific and high-level amplification in metastatic prostate cancer, makes this disintegrin a strong candidate in the malignant progression of this disease. The current study suggests that aberrant function of ADAM15 supports tumor growth, endothelial interaction, and metastasis of prostate cancer cells. Previous research from other laboratories indicated functional roles of ADAM15 in vascular endothelial biology with clear implications in endothelial interaction and angiogenesis (19, 37, 38). However, the specific actions of ADAM15 in tumor epithelium and influences on neighboring endothelial cells in the tumor microenvironment have not, until now, been explored.
To elucidate the function of ADAM15 in prostate cancer, we developed a stable shRNA-mediated ADAM15 knockdown in the highly malignant PC-3 prostate cancer cell line. We showed in this study a dramatic reduction in the malignant capacity of PC-3 cells in the s.c. implantation model. In agreement with a tumorigenic role of ADAM15 in PC-3 cells, we have seen that an exogenous overexpression of ADAM15 increased the malignant potential of the minimally invasive LNCaP cells in this same model (data not shown). Taken together, the tumor cell implantation experiments using two complementary models to alter ADAM15 levels strongly support the role of ADAM15 in the malignant progression of human prostate cancer cells.
ADAM15 is believed to support cellular adhesion and motility in several systems (31, 39). Here, we showed that the loss of ADAM15 in PC-3 cells attenuated the migratory capacity in a wound channel migration assay and decreased PC-3 basal adhesion to fibronectin, laminin, and vitronectin. Additionally, we showed that shRNA knockdown of ADAM15 decreased CD44 and
v integrin surface expression as well as MMP9 secretion and activity. This may have significant ramifications as
v-containing integrins are known to bind vitronectin whereas CD44 is considered to encompass laminin and fibronectin binding, respectively (32, 33). Because binding to other substrates, such as collagen I and IV, were unchanged in response to ADAM15 down-regulation, we believe that these results are specific to the ADAM15 phenotype. It has also been reported that low
vβ3 (40, 41) and CD44 (34, 42) levels portend to a less aggressive prostate cancer cell phenotype. The ECM glycoprotein, osteopontin, using its RGD sequence has been shown to interact with the
vβ3 integrin to regulate cell surface CD44 and MMP9 (35). ADAM15 is the only member of the ADAM family that has an RGD sequence within its disintegrin domain and has been shown to interact directly with the integrins
vβ3 and
5β1 (20, 21). Analogous to osteopontin, ADAM15 may regulate CD44, which, in turn, has been shown to regulate MMP9 expression, through this unique sequence. The interaction between ADAM15 and specific integrins or other transmembrane receptors may coordinate the proteolytic activity of ADAM15 directly to induce ECM degradation and cell migration. Alternatively, ADAM15 could potentially activate downstream substrates such as MMP9 in a hierarchical manner to support cancer cell dissemination.
E (epithelial), N (neuronal), and P (placental) cadherins function in maintaining cell-to-cell adhesion through homotypic ligation. The loss of those interactions through a variety of aberrant processes such as cadherin gene mutation, loss of heterozygosity, promoter methylation, or proteolytic cleavage can support cancer cell migration and invasion. In aggressive prostate cancer cells, N-cadherin is highly expressed and has been shown to mediate their adhesion and migration (43). The loss of full-length N-cadherin reduces cell adhesion and may promote cell migration (44). Furthermore, serum levels of soluble N-cadherin are up-regulated in multiple cancers including prostate cancer and correlated directly with an increase in PSA levels (45). Within our current study, we have made the interesting observation that shADAM15 PC-3Luc cells had significantly reduced levels of shed N-cadherin in conditioned medium compared with vector control. These findings were corroborated by the fact that an N-cadherin–expressing melanoma cell line, Mel147, also had reduced soluble N-cadherin levels in its conditioned medium in response to ADAM15 down-regulation (data not shown). In addition, reconstitution of immunoprecipitated ADAM15 and N-cadherin resulted in the cleavage of N-cadherin into the identical 90 kDa fragment observed in the conditioned medium. These observations support two possible scenarios: (a) that ADAM15 cleaves N-cadherin directly or (b) that ADAM15 represents an indirect or upstream event in the shedding of N-cadherin. Regardless of a direct or an indirect role, we believe that N-cadherin solubilization may support the migratory phenotype observed in ADAM15-expressing PC-3 cells by disrupting the homotypic interaction between N-cadherin molecules and increasing N-cadherin cell surface turnover.
The
vβ3 integrin has been shown to support endothelial-epithelial adhesion and TEM of tumor cells (29). To assess whether the loss of ADAM15 and the associated reduction of
v integrin would hinder PC-3 epithelial-endothelial adhesion, we examined the adhesive capacity of PC-3 cells to human endothelial cells and showed that the loss of ADAM15 resulted in a significant reduction in endothelial adhesion. A concomitant reduction in transendothelial migration of shADAM15 PC-3 through HUVEC and HDMEC monolayers not only supports that ADAM15 mediates endothelial adhesion of tumor cells but coordinates the transmigration of tumor cells through endothelial monolayers.
The CD44 receptor has been implicated in prostate cancer adhesion, migration, invasion, and metastasis (34). In this study, we showed that CD44 is down-regulated in cell culture and in tumors in response to the loss of ADAM15. To investigate whether ADAM15 contributes to in vivo prostate cancer metastasis, we used an invasive model of prostate cancer metastasis. We showed that vector PC-3Luc–injected mice developed substantial metastatic lesions in the lung, spine, and tibia. ADAM15 down-regulation within these cells hindered their ability to form distant metastasis. Considering the microarray data, which shows a significant correlation of ADAM15 expression with the metastatic progression of human prostate cancer, results from the mouse metastasis model suggests that ADAM15 may support the metastatic progression of prostate cancer.
The current study, which has its foundations on the clinical correlation of ADAM15 and the metastatic progression of prostate cancer, provides strong experimental support for this disintegrin in prostate cancer progression. Based on the current findings, we suggest that ADAM15 plays critical regulatory roles in the malignant progression of prostate cancer to metastatic disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Erin Sargent for her help in performing the in vivo experimental analysis, the University of Michigan Histology Core for excellent histologic support, and Dr. Casey Wright for technical assistance.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 6/28/07. Revised 11/28/07. Accepted 12/19/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5β1 and
vβ3 in atherosclerosis. J Cell Biochem 2003;89:808–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
) supports tumor cell adhesion. Am J Pathol 1999;154:1489–501.
vβ3 and
5β1 integrins on different haemopoietic cells. J Cell Sci 1999;112:579–87.[Abstract]
vβ3. J Biol Chem 1998;273:7345–50.
(CXCL12) increases endothelial adhesion and transendothelial migration: role of MEK/ERK signaling pathway-dependent NF-
B activation. Cancer Res 2005;65:9891–8.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. V. Verbisck, E. T. Costa, F. F. Costa, F. P. Cavalher, M. D.M. Costa, A. Muras, V. A. Paixao, R. Moura, M. F. Granato, D. F Ierardi, et al. ADAM23 Negatively Modulates {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin Activation during Metastasis Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 69(13): 5546 - 5552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Duffy, E. McKiernan, N. O'Donovan, and P. M. McGowan Role of ADAMs in Cancer Formation and Progression Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1140 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R Barthel, J. D Gavino, G. K Wiese, J. M Jaynes, J. Siddiqui, and C. J Dimitroff Analysis of glycosyltransferase expression in metastatic prostate cancer cells capable of rolling activity on microvascular endothelial (E)-selectin Glycobiology, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 806 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Najy, K. C. Day, and M. L. Day The Ectodomain Shedding of E-cadherin by ADAM15 Supports ErbB Receptor Activation J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2008; 283(26): 18393 - 18401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |