| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
B Activation by Astrocyte Elevated Gene-1Departments of 1 Urology, 2 Pathology, and 3 Neurosurgery, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; and 4 Department of Human Genetics, Massey Cancer Center, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
Requests for reprints: Devanand Sarkar, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0037. E-mail: dsarkar{at}vcu.edu and Paul B. Fisher, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0037. E-mail: pbfisher{at}vcu.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B (NF-
B) signaling pathway. The present studies elucidate the domains of AEG-1 important for mediating its function. Serial NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal deletion mutants were constructed and functional analysis revealed that the NH2-terminal 71 amino acids were essential for invasion, migration, and NF-
B–activating properties of AEG-1. The p65-interaction domain was identified between amino acids 101 to 205, indicating that p65 interaction alone is not sufficient to mediate AEG-1 function. Coimmunoprecipitation assays revealed that AEG-1 interacts with cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein–binding protein (CBP), indicating that it might act as a bridging factor between NF-
B, CBP, and the basal transcription machinery. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that AEG-1 is associated with the NF-
B binding element in the interleukin-8 promoter. Thus, AEG-1 might function as a coactivator for NF-
B, consequently augmenting expression of genes necessary for invasion of glioma cells. In these contexts, AEG-1 represents a viable potential target for the therapy of malignant glioma. [Cancer Res 2008;68(5):1478–84] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) was cloned in our laboratory as a novel HIV-1– and tumor necrosis factor-
–induced transcript from primary human fetal astrocytes (PHFA; refs. 6–10). AEG-1 mRNA encodes a single-pass transmembrane protein of predicted molecular mass of
64 kDa and pI 9.3 (10). Genomic BLAST search revealed that the AEG-1 gene is located at 8q22 where cytogenetic analyses of human gliomas confirm recurrent amplifications (11). Analysis of its expression pattern revealed that AEG-1 is overexpressed at both mRNA and protein levels in GBM compared with PHFA (8, 10). Additionally, AEG-1 expression is elevated in adult astrocytes displaying an aggressive glioma-like phenotype when injected into nude mice, resulting from the sequential expression of SV40 T antigen, telomerase (hTERT), and T24 Ha-ras (8, 10). A detailed expression analysis using immunocytochemistry and Western blotting in multiple normal adult human brains versus various brain tumor samples confirmed the in vivo overexpression of AEG-1 in >95% of diverse human brain tumors (10).
Overexpression of AEG-1 via an adenoviral vector augments the anchorage-independent growth of human glioma cell lines and increases their migration and invasion properties (9). Conversely, inhibition of AEG-1 by small interfering RNA (siRNA) in malignant glioma cell lines significantly inhibits migration and invasion. AEG-1 can synergize with Ha-ras to augment the transformed phenotype in immortal SV40 T antigen–expressing human melanocytes (FM516-SV) and AEG-1 is a Ha-ras downstream gene mediating its growth-promoting properties (8, 12). Additional studies by another group, who used the name metadherin, show the involvement of AEG-1 in tumor metastasis especially to lungs (13). In total, these findings implicate overexpression of AEG-1 in the development and progression of malignant gliomas.
A molecular mechanism by which AEG-1 increases migration and invasion of malignant glioma cells is by activating the nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) pathway (9). Inhibition of NF-
B nullifies AEG-1–induced augmentation of anchorage-independent growth, invasion, and migration. AEG-1 is a transmembrane protein located predominantly in the endoplasmic reticulum and perinuclear space (8, 14). However, AEG-1 contains three putative nuclear localization signals (NLS) and upon treatment with TNF-
or when overexpressed, AEG-1 translocates into the nucleus where it interacts with the p65 subunit of NF-
B (9, 10). The importance of nuclear translocation and p65 interaction in mediating the tumor-promoting function of AEG-1 remains to be elucidated. The present studies provide detailed insights into the structural domains of AEG-1 mediating its actions and decipher the molecular mechanism by which AEG-1 activates the NF-
B pathway.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of plasmids and transfection. The COOH-terminal HA-tagged AEG-1 expression plasmid in the backbone of pcDNA3.1-Hygro has been described previously (8). This plasmid was used as template to construct different mutant constructs by PCR and cloned into the NheI/XhoI sites of pcDNA3.1-Hygro plasmid. All constructs have a COOH-terminal HA tag. The NH2-terminal deletion mutants were constructed using the common antisense primer 5'-CTCGAGTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACGTTTCTCGTCTGGC-3'. All the sense primers have a consensus Kozak sequence (GCCACC) preceding an ATG codon. The sense primers are, for N1, 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGTGGGCCGCGGCTTGCGCCGGC-3'; for N2, 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGGACGACCTGGCCTTGCTGAAG-3'; for N3, 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGCGTAAACGTGATAAGGTGCTG-3'; for N4, 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGACCGAGCAACTTACAACCGCA-3'; for N5, 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGTCTGGAAAAGGAGATTCTACA-3'; for N6, 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGTCTGTAAAACTCTCCTCACAG-3'. All COOH-terminal deletion mutants were constructed using the common sense primer 5'-GCTAGCGCCACCATGGCTGCACGGAGCTGG-3'. The antisense primers are for C1, 5'-CTCGAGTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAAAGAGTCTTGATAGGCTGGCT-3'; for C2, 5'-CTCGAGTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACCAATTGCCCCACTCTTC-3'; for C3, 5'-CTCGAGTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAAACTGGCTCAGCAGTAGA-3'; and for C4, 5'-CTCGAGTCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTACTTTTCATTCCAGCCTCC-3'. NLSmut construct was created using site-directed mutagenesis using a kit from Stratagene according to the manufacturer's protocol with primers, sense 5'-TGCGCCGGCGCCGCTGTTGTAGTTGCTAGCCCGCCCCGC-3' and antisense 5'-GCGGGGCGGGCTAGCAACTACAACAGCGGCGCCGGCGCA-3'. The underlined bases are mutated converting RKKRR sequence (amino acids 79–83) to AVVVA sequence. N1-NLSmut was created using the same primers using N1 construct as template. Swapping NheI/HaeI–digested NH2-terminal fragment from N1 into C1 and C2 plasmids, respectively, created N1 + C1 and N1 + C2 constructs. The authenticity of all constructs was confirmed by sequencing. Transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For luciferase assay, cells were plated into 24-well plates and the next day transfected with AEG-1 or its different mutants along with 3
B-luc (luciferase reporter plasmid containing three tandem repeats of NF-
B binding site) and Renilla luciferase expression plasmid for transfection control. Luciferase assays were measured using Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Invasion and migration assays. Invasion assays were performed using modified Boyden chambers with a polycarbonate Nucleopore membrane (BD Bioscience) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For migration (wound healing) assays, a wound was introduced by scratching the confluent monolayer of cells with a pipette tip (time 0). Plates were washed twice with PBS to remove detached cells and incubated with complete growth medium, and cell migration into the wounded (scraped) empty space was followed over 18 h.
Anchorage-independent growth assay in soft agar. Anchorage-independent growth assays were performed by seeding 1 x 105 cells in 0.4% Noble agar on a 0.8% agar base layer both of which contained growth medium. Colonies were counted 2 weeks after seeding and the data from triplicate determinations were expressed as mean ± SD.
Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from cells using Qiagen RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Two micrograms of total RNA were used for reverse transcription-PCR using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to standard methods (9). Interleukin-8 (IL-8) sense, 5'-GGTGCAGAGGGTTGTGGAGAA-3'; IL-8 antisense, 5'-GCAGACTAGGGTTGCCAGATT-3'; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) sense, 5'-ATGGGGAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC-3'; GAPDH antisense, 5'-GCTGATGATCTTGAGGCTGTTGTC-3'.
Preparation of whole-cell lysates, coimmunoprecipitation, and Western blot analyses. Preparation of whole-cell lysates, coimmunoprecipitation, and Western blot analyses were performed as described (9). The primary antibodies used were anti-HA (1:1,000; mouse monoclonal; Covance), anti-CBP (1:200; rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-AEG-1 (1:1,000; chicken polyclonal), and anti-EF1
(1:1,000; mouse monoclonal; Upstate).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed using a commercially available kit from Active Motif. H4 cells (5 x 107) were fixed with formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were harvested and the nuclei were isolated using a Dounce homogenizer. The nuclear pellet containing chromatin was sheared with enzyme Shearing cocktail solution; the chromatin was precleared with protein G beads; and anti-p65, anti–AEG-1, or anti-CBP antibody was added to the precleared chromatin. The DNA-protein complex was precipitated using protein G beads, washed thoroughly, and DNA was eluted from the beads. The eluted DNA was treated with RNase A and proteinase K, purified, and used as template for PCR using IL-8 promoter–specific primers, sense 5'-ATGTCAGCTCTCGACGAAAATAGA-3' and antisense 5'-GGAGGGATTGCAAGGTTTAGC-3'. The PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference analysis. A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
B reporter luciferase plasmid and a Renilla luciferase expression plasmid. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were treated with TNF-
(10 ng/mL) and luciferase activity was measured by a luminometer. The firefly luciferase activity was normalized by Renilla luciferase activity. TNF-
treatment or AEG-1 transfection augmented the NF-
B reporter luciferase activity by 2.5- to 3-fold. A combination of TNF-
and AEG-1 increased the fold induction by
6-fold (Fig. 2
). All NH2-terminal deletion mutants lost the induction property, indicating that the first 71 amino acids are crucial for AEG-1–mediated induction of NF-
B reporter activity. In contrast, removal of the COOH-terminal regions significantly augmented AEG-1 activity, especially with the C2 construct, indicating the presence of a repression domain in this region. Mutation of NLS1 in NLSmut still retained the induction activity, indicating that this particular NLS is not essential for mediating AEG-1 function.
|
B downstream gene, reinforced the results of the NF-
B reporter analysis. H4 cells were transfected with the different deletion and mutant AEG-1 constructs and IL-8 mRNA expression was analyzed by RT-PCR 48 h later (Fig. 3
). AEG-1 (lane 2), the COOH-terminal deletion mutants (lanes 9–12), and NLSmut (lane 13) induced IL-8 mRNA expression, whereas all NH2-terminal deletion mutants (lanes 3–8; lanes 14–16) lost this induction property, indicating that the NH2-terminal 71 amino acids are crucial for activation of NF-
B and its downstream signaling.
|
B reporter assays, whereas AEG-1, its COOH-terminal deletion mutants, and NLSmut retained migration (Fig. 4A
), invasion (Fig. 4B), and anchorage-independent growth-promoting properties (Fig. 4C), all of the NH2-terminal deletion mutants lost these activities.
|
B, experiments were designed to elucidate the domains of AEG-1 involved in mediating the p65 interaction. H4 cells were transfected with the different deletion and mutant AEG-1 constructs and 48 h later immunoprecipitation assays were performed using rabbit polyclonal anti-p65 antibody. The immunoprecipitates were washed stringently and subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting was performed using anti-HA antibody. AEG-1, the NH2-terminal deletion mutants N1 and N2, and all the COOH-terminal deletion mutants could be precipitated by anti-p65 antibody (Fig. 5
). However, the N3 to N6 NH2-terminal deletion mutants did not interact with p65, indicating that amino acids 101 to 205 mediate interaction of AEG-1 with p65.
|
treatment causes translocation of the p50-p65 subunit of NF-
B into the nucleus with subsequent binding to the NF-
B consensus site in the IL-8 promoter and enhanced gene transcription. AEG-1 is induced by TNF-
and overexpression of AEG-1 induces IL-8 transcription. Accordingly, we determined if AEG-1 is associated with p50-p65 complex bound to the IL-8 promoter. ChiP assays were performed using H4 cell lysates, untreated or treated with TNF-
. The cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation using either control rabbit IgG or rabbit polyclonal anti-p65 or anti–AEG-1 antibodies. DNA was eluted from the immunoprecipitates and was subjected to PCR using primers flanking the NF-
B consensus site in the IL-8 promoter. Control IgG did not immunoprecipitate any DNA (Fig. 6A
). On the contrary, upon TNF-
treatment, but not under basal conditions, both p65 and AEG-1 associated with the IL-8 promoter.
|
B (16, 17). Immunoprecipitation was performed using either chicken anti–AEG-1 or rabbit anti-CBP antibodies followed by immunoblotting. Rabbit IgG and chicken IgY were used as controls for immunoprecipitation. Anti–AEG-1 and anti-CBP antibodies effectively immunoprecipitated CBP and AEG-1, respectively, whereas no specific band was observed with control antibodies (Fig. 6B). To further validate these associations, H4 cells were transfected with either control siRNA or AEG-1 siRNA and treated with TNF-
, and ChIP assays were performed using either control rabbit IgG or rabbit polyclonal anti-p65, anti–AEG-1, or anti-CBP antibodies. DNA was eluted from the immunoprecipitates and was subjected to PCR using primers flanking the NF-
B consensus site in the IL-8 promoter. AEG-1 siRNA, not control siRNA, could significantly inhibit AEG-1 protein level (Fig. 6C, left). In the presence of control siRNA p65, AEG-1 and CBP associated with the IL-8 promoter (Fig. 6C, right). When AEG-1 was inhibited by siRNA, p65 could associate with the IL-8 promoter, whereas the association of AEG-1 as well as CBP was significantly reduced (Fig. 6C, right). These findings indicate that AEG-1 might function as a bridging molecule between p65 NF-
B and CBP and the basal transcription machinery, thus facilitating transcriptional activation of NF-
B downstream genes necessary for migration and invasion (Fig. 6D). In these contexts, inhibiting AEG-1 expression or blocking AEG-1 interactions with NF-
B or other targets might be used as a strategy for abrogating the pathogenicity of malignant gliomas. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B complex transcriptionally regulates all of these genes (20–25). Aberrant or constitutive activation of NF-
B has also been documented in high-grade human gliomas (25–27). Indeed, interference with the uPA-uPAR system, MMP, and VEGF pathways, and more importantly, inhibition of NF-
B itself, inhibit tumor growth and neovascularization of glioma cells in preclinical studies and clinical trials (20, 21, 28, 29). Our observation that AEG-1 plays a key role in regulating NF-
B activation in malignant glioma and is overexpressed in human glioma samples indicates that targeting AEG-1 might be a potential approach for effective inhibition of malignant glioma pathogenicity.
The active NF-
B complex, p50-p65, is sequestered in the cytoplasm by I
B and upon receipt of an appropriate signal that leads to phosphorylation and ubiquitin-proteosome–mediated degradation of I
B, the p50-p65 NF-
B translocates into the nucleus where it binds to consensus NF-
B sequences in the promoter of diverse target genes, thereby augmenting their transcription (30, 31). Activation of transcription by NF-
B requires transcriptional coactivator proteins, such as those possessing histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity (32–35). HAT plays a key role in altering chromatin structure, allowing recruitment of the basal transcription factors and RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription (16). NF-
B interacts with several HATs, such as CBP and its homologue p300, p300/CBP-associated factor, and members of the SRC/p160 family (32–35). These HATs acetylate core histone proteins as well as p50-p65 NF-
B to stimulate NF-
B–dependent gene expression (36). Our ChIP experiments reveal that AEG-1 is located on the consensus NF-
B binding element in the IL-8 promoter together with p50-p65. Additionally, we also document that in addition to interacting with p65 NF-
B, AEG-1 also interacts with CBP. In these contexts, AEG-1 might function as a bridging factor facilitating interaction among p50-p65 NF-
B, CBP, and the basal transcription machinery and therefore functions as a coactivator in regulating NF-
B–mediated transcription. AEG-1 is a highly basic protein that is rich in lysine, amino acid targets for acetylation. The rodent homologue of AEG-1 is LYRIC (Lysine Rich CEACAM1 co-isolated; ref. 14). As such, AEG-1 might itself be acetylated upon TNF-
treatment or in a state of constitutive overexpression and activation, as observed in glioma cells, to regulate transcription. Current studies are addressing this hypothesis.
AEG-1 translocates into the nucleus upon TNF-
treatment and when overexpressed interacts with p65 NF-
B (9). In this context, it was surmised that nuclear translocation is important in mediating NF-
B activation by AEG-1. There are three putative NLS in AEG-1 and deletion and mutation of either of these regions did not interfere with the functional activity of AEG-1. These findings indicate that there might either be a cryptic NLS in the amino-terminal end of AEG-1 or AEG-1 interacts with a chaperone protein that facilitates its nuclear import. A similar situation is evident for another coactivator SRC-3 that upon TNF-
treatment is phosphorylated by I
B kinase, which facilitates its nuclear translocation and participation in transcriptional regulation by NF-
B (33). In these contexts, the importance of posttranslational regulation, such as phosphorylation and acetylation, might be central in mediating AEG-1 function, an issue actively being pursued.
In summary, the present studies elucidate a novel mechanism of NF-
B regulation by AEG-1. The observation that in many glioma cells NF-
B is constitutively active emphasizes a vital role of overexpressed AEG-1 in the induction of constitutively active NF-
B and regulation of aggressive stages of malignant glioma. In these contexts, targeting AEG-1 by lentivirus-based short hairpin RNA approaches or by small-molecule inhibitors, in combination with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, might produce prolonged survival benefits in malignant glioma patients and significantly ameliorate the aggressiveness of this invariably fatal neoplasm.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
D. Sarkar is a Harrison Scholar in Cancer Research. P.B. Fisher holds the Thelma Neumeyer Corman Chair in Cancer Research and is a Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation Investigator.
Received 11/ 8/07. Revised 12/14/07. Accepted 12/31/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
treatment. Gene 2003;306:67–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
B pathway by astrocyte elevated gene-1: implications for tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Res 2006;66:1509–16.
promotes cell growth by switching the binding preference of CBP from p53 to NF-
B. Mol Cell 2007;26:75–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
vβ1 integrin and focal adhesion kinase signaling pathway. Cancer Res 2006;66:775–83.
B in glioblastoma multiforme drives invasive phenotype. J Neurooncol 2007;85:39–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
B, and Stat3 in human diffuse gliomas. Lab Invest 2004;84:941–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
B transcriptional activity. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:2178–90.
B and I
B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu Rev Immunol 1996;14:649–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
B in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:301–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
B determines its association with CBP/p300 or HDAC-1. Mol Cell 2002;9:625–36.[CrossRef][Medline]
B kinase. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:3549–61.
B acetylation by coactivator p300 and HIV-1 Tat proteins. J Biol Chem 2002;277:4973–80.
B engages CBP/p300 and histone acetyltransferase activity for transcriptional activation of the interleukin-6 gene promoter. J Biol Chem 1999;274:32091–8.
B transcription factor complex by acetylation. J Mol Med 2003;81:549–57.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Sarkar, L. Emdad, S.-G. Lee, B. K. Yoo, Z.-z. Su, and P. B. Fisher Astrocyte Elevated Gene-1: Far More Than Just a Gene Regulated in Astrocytes Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 69(22): 8529 - 8535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Hu, Y. Wei, and Y. Kang The Multifaceted Role of MTDH/AEG-1 in Cancer Progression Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 15(18): 5615 - 5620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Yoo, R. Gredler, N. Vozhilla, Z.-z. Su, D. Chen, T. Forcier, K. Shah, U. Saxena, U. Hansen, P. B. Fisher, et al. Identification of genes conferring resistance to 5-fluorouracil PNAS, August 4, 2009; 106(31): 12938 - 12943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yu, K. Chen, H. Zheng, X. Guo, W. Jia, M. Li, M. Zeng, J. Li, and L. Song Overexpression of astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1) is associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) progression and pathogenesis Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2009; 30(5): 894 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-z. Su, S.-G. Lee, L. Emdad, I. V. Lebdeva, P. Gupta, K. Valerie, D. Sarkar, and P. B. Fisher Cloning and characterization of SARI (suppressor of AP-1, regulated by IFN) PNAS, December 30, 2008; 105(52): 20906 - 20911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. de la Iglesia, G. Konopka, K.-L. Lim, C. L. Nutt, J. F. Bromberg, D. A. Frank, P. S. Mischel, D. N. Louis, and A. Bonni Deregulation of a STAT3-Interleukin 8 Signaling Pathway Promotes Human Glioblastoma Cell Proliferation and Invasiveness J. Neurosci., June 4, 2008; 28(23): 5870 - 5878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |