| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
1 Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and Departments of 2 Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 4 Pathology, and 5 Cell Biology, 6 Cancer Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, and 7 Oklahoma School of Sciences and Mathematics, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Requests for reprints: Richard D. Cummings or Tongzhong Ju, Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Room 4001, Atlanta, GA 30322. Phone: 404-727-6166; E-mail: rdcummi{at}emory.edu or tju{at}emory.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Tn antigen (GalNAc
-Ser/Thr) is a biosynthetic intermediate in the formation of normal mucin-type O-glycans and is typically extended by the action of the enzyme core 1 β3 galactosyltransferase (core 1 β3Gal-T, T-synthase; ref. 11). Thus, Tn antigen expression results from lack of T-synthase activity. Expression of the Tn antigen is also often associated with expression of the STn antigen (NeuAc
6GalNAc
-Ser/Thr). We recently discovered that expression of the T-synthase is under the control of a unique molecular chaperone we termed Cosmc (12). Human Cosmc resides on Xq24 as a single exon gene. Acquired mutations of Cosmc, as seen in some human hematopoietic diseases (13), causes loss of the T-synthase activity and consequent expression of the Tn and STn antigens (14).
Such observations prompted us to examine whether human tumor cells expressing the Tn and STn antigens exhibit mutations in Cosmc. Here, we report that all human tumor cells examined, including human tumor cell lines and two human cervical cancer specimens, which express the Tn and STn antigens, harbor mutations in Cosmc that result in a loss of function of Cosmc and consequent loss of T-synthase activity. These results provide the first explanation at a genetic level for expression of TACAs in human cancers.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transfection, Southern blots, and hybridization. Tumor cells were transfected with wild-type Cosmc (wtCosmc) or T-synthase using Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For Southern blotting, genomic DNA (gDNA; 5 µg) from LOX, FEMX-I, and normal control leukocytes was digested in a 50-µL reaction with 100 units of BamHI and SacI (New England BioLabs) at 37°C overnight. DNA was extracted by isopropanol precipitation and then resuspended in 20 µL of TE [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA (pH 8.0)] and analyzed on a 0.8% Agarose gel (11 x 14 cm) at 22 V for overnight. After denaturation in 0.5 N NaOH plus 1.5 mol/L NaCl and neutralization with 0.5 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) containing 1.5 mol/L NaCl, the gel was equilibrated with 20x SSC [3.0 mol/L sodium chloride, 0.3 mol/L sodium citrate–HCl (pH 7.0)], and the DNA was transferred to a Nytran Supercharge TurboBlotter membrane (11 x 14 cm) using a TurboBlotter (Whatman Scheicher & Schuell) for 10 to 12 h. After washing with water for 5 min, the membrane was heated at 80°C for 30 min and the DNA was cross-linked under UV. For hybridization, the DNA probe was the open reading frame (ORF) of human Cosmc. The DNA probe was prepared by PCR. Twenty nanograms of DNA were random primer–labeled with
-32P-dCTP (>3,000 Ci/mmol; America Radiochemical Company) using Rediprime Random Prime Labeling System (GE HealthCare) according to manufacturer's protocol. After prehybridization with 12 mL of Hybrisol I (Chemicon International) containing 200 µg/mL of sheared salmon sperm DNA at 42.5°C for 4 to 6 h, the membrane was hybridized with denatured probe at 42.5°C overnight. The membrane was then washed twice with 2x SSC plus 0.1% SDS at room temperature, twice with 0.5x SSC plus 0.5% SDS at 65°C, and finally twice with 0.1x SSC plus 0.1% SDS at 65°C. The signal was detected by exposing the membrane to a BioMax film for 3 to 5 d at –80°C before the film was developed.
Reverse transcription–PCR, PCR, cloning, and sequencing. The total RNA and gDNA from cells were prepared using Absolutely RNA Nanoprep kit (Stratagene) and FlexiGene DNA kit (Qiagen, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocols. The reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) for human Cosmc and T-synthase were performed with 5 to 20 ng of total RNA as template with a two-step method (AccuScript High-Fidelity RT-PCR System from Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The PCRs were carried out with Phusion High-Fidelity PCR kit (New England Biolabs) in a 50-µL reaction containing 100 ng of gDNA as template and 100 nmol/L of each primer. For cDNA of Cosmc, the forward primer was 5'-CGTGAGAGGAAACCCGTG-3' and the reverse primer was 5'-TGTGTGGTTATACCAGTGCC-3'. For PCR amplification of the coding region or Exon of Cosmc and Exons of T-synthase, the primers were the forward primer 5'-CTGTTTTAGCAGCAAATAGAGGGG-3' and the reverse primer 5'-CAATTCCCTTCTCTTGAGGCAAAC-3' for exon I, the forward primer 5'-CCTCCAGTGATGTCCTAGATAACAC-3' and the reverse primer 5'-ACTACTGCTGATTGCTGATGTCCC-3' for exon II, and the forward primer 5'-GTTCCTCTGCTTTACCTTGCCATC-3' and the reverse primer 5'-TGGGATTCCAGTGTTCTATGTCAG-3' for exon III. The CpG island was predicted by an online program.8 For PCR amplification of the CpG island II of Cosmc, the forward primer was 5'-GCTGGCACTGTGGTTAAG-3' and reverse primer was 5'-GGAAACAAAACTGCACACG-3'. The PCR products were analyzed on a 1% Tris-acetate EDTA agarose gel. The bands of the expected size were excised, and the DNAs were extracted from the gel with QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc.). RT-PCR and PCR products for Cosmc and T-synthase were subjected directly to sequencing or subcloned into pCR4Topo blunt vector (Invitrogen).
Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence staining. Mock and wtCosmc stably transfected LOX and FEMX-I cells (5 x 104) were seeded in chambered slides and cultured overnight. After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde, the cells in each chamber were treated with 5 milliunits of neuraminidase (Arthrobacter ureafaciens; Roche) in 300 µL of 50 mmol/L acetate buffer (pH 5.5) at 37°C for 1 h. For immunohistochemistry, the staining procedure was done according to the manufacturer's protocol (Zymed Laboratories). Briefly, the cells were incubated with 5 µg/mL anti-Tn monoclonal antibody (mAb) at room temperature for 1 h, then incubated in the peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgM (1:500) for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were washed after each incubation with PBS. The slides were developed with the chromogen AEC single solution for 3 to 5 min and finally counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. The cells were covered with crystal mount media and dried overnight. For fluorescence staining, the cells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and then incubated with anti-Tn mAb. After washing thrice with PBS, the cells were covered with Alexa568-labeled goat anti-mouse IgM (1:500) and 10 µg/mL FITC-labeled peanut agglutinin (PNA) in PBS in dark at room temperature for 45 min. The nuclei of cells were stained with 300 nmol/L 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) dye in PBS. After washing, the cells were covered with mount media and visualized under a regular microscope for immunohistochemistry and under a fluorescence microscope. The images were recorded at 20x magnification.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting. Approximately 5 x 105 cells [wild type, stably mock-transfected with pcDNA3.1(+)] (Invitrogen) or transfected with expression vector expressing human wtCosmc were seeded in a T75 flask with complete media the day before the experiment and cultured overnight. Cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized, and harvested. After washing with Hank's balanced solution (Invitrogen), the cells were suspended in 600 µL of Hank's solution and divided into two fractions. Twenty milliunits of neuraminidase was added to one fraction and incubated at 37°C for 45 to 60 min, shaking the cells every 15 min to keep them in suspension. The cells were washed once with Hank's solution and suspended in 400 µL of Hank's solution. Both the neuraminidase-treated cells and the untreated cells were divided into four fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) tubes (100 µL per tube). For anti-Tn antibody staining, 100 µL of mouse anti-Tn mAb (IgM, diluted at 1:100 with PBS) were added to one neuraminidase-treated and one untreated fraction. The controls were incubated with control mouse IgM. All fractions were incubated on ice for 60 min. Then cells were washed thrice with PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor 488–labeled goat anti-mouse IgM (Molecular Probes) at 1:500 dilution in Hank's solution. The cells were incubated in the dark on ice for 45 min. The cells were then washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 500 µL of PBS, and analyzed on a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson). Tn(+) cells were sorted on a cell sorter (FACSorter, Becton Dickinson).
For lectin staining, 100 µL of FITC-labeled PNA at 2.5 µg/mL in 50 mmol/L TBS [Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/L NaCl] containing 1 mmol/L CaCl2 and MgCl2 were added to one of the neuraminidase-treated cells and one of the untreated cells, mixed, and incubated on ice for 1 h under the dark. The control was the same as above, except that 20 mmol/L of lactose were present in the FITC-PNA solution. After washing with 3 mL PBS thrice, the cells were resuspended in 500 µL of PBS, analyzed on a flow cytometer, and sorted.
Examination of Cosmc from human cervical tumor specimens. Two specimens of human cervical cancer samples (DH85 and DH86) were provided by the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center under an institutional review board–approved protocol. These specimens were first stained immunohistochemically for expression of with Tn and STn antigens, using appropriate mAbs. The Tn/STn(+) tumor cells were then collected by laser capture microdissection (LCM). The gDNA was isolated from the cells using Qiagen micro-DNA isolation kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. The ORF of human Cosmc was analyzed by sequencing the PCR product, as described above. The gene and cDNA of Cosmc from cervical tissue samples were analyzed by PCR and RT-PCR using gDNA and total RNA from the tissue as templates, respectively, and DNA sequencing. To sequence two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP; rs591040 and rs17327439) 1.2 to 1.4 kb downstream of the coding region of Cosmc, PCR was performed using 5'-AATGGCACAATCTCGGCTC-3' as forward primer and 5'-TGCTCTAACACTCTATGCGGAC-3'as reverse primer covering those two SNPs, and PCR product was subjected to direct sequencing.
Preparation of membrane extracts. Approximately, 106 logarithmically growing cells were harvested. Membranes were solubilized with 150 µL of PBS containing protease inhibitors (Complete-mini, EDTA-free; Roche) and 0.5% Triton X-100 on ice for 30 min. A membrane extract was obtained by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 5 min and collection of the supernatant. Membrane extract (50 µL) was desialylated by incubation at 37°C overnight with A. ureafaciens neuraminidase (10 milliunits; Roche).
Additional assays. The activity of T-synthase was measured as previously described using the donor UDP-Gal and the acceptor GalNAc-
-phenyl (Sigma-Aldrich; ref. 11). The protein concentration in cell extracts was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method (Pierce) following the manufacturer's instructions with BSA as a standard. Cell extracts (20 µL) that were treated and untreated with neuraminidase were analyzed on SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Western blots were analyzed by immunoblotting with mouse anti-STn mAb (IgG1, clone HB-STn1 from DakoCytomation), mouse anti-Tn antibody (IgM), and the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–labeled lectins Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA) and PNA, as previously described (12, 17), using HighSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce). Anti-Tn mAb (mouse IgM, CA3638, clone 12A8-C7-F5; ref. 18) was kindly provided by the late Dr. Georg F. Springer from University of Illinois. HRP-labeled lectins HPA and PNA and FITC-labeled PNA were purchased from E-Y Laboratories.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-Ser/Thr; ref. 20). T-antigen is further elongated to form sialyl T-antigen, which is not recognized by PNA. Treatment with neuraminidase exposes the T-antigen and PNA recognition. Introduction of wtCosmc into LSC cells led to the expression of high molecular weight glycoproteins recognized by PNA following neuraminidase treatment. Similar staining followed expression of wtCosmc in Jurkat cells, which also contain mutations in Cosmc (Fig. 1D). It is noteworthy that PNA stained, to a lesser extent, Jurkat cells. This likely results from the minimal T-synthase activity present in Jurkat cells, which express a truncated Cosmc capable of producing 2% to 5% of the activity of full protein of Cosmc (12). These results show that the mutation in Cosmc results in Tn/STn antigen expression in LSC cells and that wtCosmc can complement the defect and rescue the T-synthase activity and O-glycan extension.
Cosmc is mutated in subsets of LS174T cells with the Tn(+) phenotype, whereas Cosmc is normal in Tn(–) cells. LSC and LSB cells were originally derived from LS174T cells. We attempted to enrich for any Tn(+) cells within the LS174T population using the anti-Tn antibody and found that
5% of LS174T cells stained positive for Tn antigen, designated LS174T-Tn(+), which were subsequently subcloned into five separate subclones. Genetic analyses below showed that these subclones represented two types of populations that we designated as LS174T-Tn(+)-I and LS174T-Tn(+)-II.
We analyzed total expression of Tn and STn antigens by Western blotting before and after treatment with neuraminidase. As shown in Fig. 2A , the LS174T-Tn(–) cells, which had been sorted based on their lack of expression of Tn antigen, exhibited no staining with anti-Tn antibody. However, the parental LS174T cells, which is a mixture of Tn(+) and Tn(–) cell, exhibited some staining with the anti-Tn and anti-STn antibodies. By contrast, both LS174T-Tn(+)-I and LS174T-Tn(+)-II exhibited robust staining of high molecular weight glycoproteins with anti-Tn and with anti-STn antibodies (Fig. 2A). The staining with anti-STn was abolished by treatment with neuraminidase. These results show that LS174T-Tn(+)-I and LS174T-Tn(+)-II express many glycoproteins with Tn and STn antigens and that the LS174T cells selected based on their lack of Tn expression [LS174T-Tn(–) cells] did not express either Tn or STn antigens.
|
Thus, a total of three different mutations were found in subclones from LS174T cells that expressed the Tn antigen: a T-insertion at position 53 in LSC cells (Fig. 1A), an 482A in LS174T-Tn(+)-I cells (Fig. 2B), and G553T in LS174T-Tn(+)-II cells (Fig. 2C). These results show that Tn/STn expression in LS174T cells correlates with mutations in Cosmc.
Human melanoma LOX cells express Tn/STn antigens and do not express Cosmc transcripts. The above evidence shows that mutations in Cosmc occur in poly-T (Fig. 1A) and poly-A (Fig. 2B) islands, but these data are insufficient to conclude that mutations in Cosmc accumulate in high-frequency hotspots (Supplementary Fig. S1A and B). To further explore mutations in Cosmc associated with Tn antigen expression, we examined two melanoma cell lines, LOX and FEMX-I (21, 22). LOX cells, derived from a male patient (22), were previously shown to be stained by HPA (23), a lectin that specifically recognizes
-GalNAc residues as in the Tn antigen (24). Interestingly, HPA binding correlated with experimental lung metastases in athymic nude mice (16).
Although transcripts for both T-synthase and Cosmc were expressed in FEMX-I cells, RT-PCR failed to detect the transcript for Cosmc in LOX cells (Fig. 3A ). Loss of the Cosmc transcript could arise from several reasons, including gene deletion, alterations in the promoter, transcript instability, or possibly gene methylation. To explore these possibilities, we first investigated whether unbalanced genetic translocations caused deletion of Cosmc from the genome of these cells. However, PCR analysis of DNA isolated from LOX cells showed that Cosmc was present and that the genetic integrity of the encoding portion of Cosmc remained intact (data not shown).
|
9.0-kb band. SacI digestion of LOX gDNA also failed to produce a 4.3-kb band, which covered a portion of promoter region and 5' portion of coding region (Fig. 3C). These results show that LOX cells contain a genomic deletion upstream of the Cosmc coding region, corroborating PCR demonstration of a CpG-II deletion. Taken together, these results show that LOX cells have a genomic deletion upstream of the coding region that results in lack of expression of Cosmc transcripts. To examine the correlation in LOX cells between loss of Cosmc transcripts and Tn expression, we examined whether LOX cells were stained by HPA, as previously reported (23). LOX cells bound well to HPA and had poor binding to PNA. FEMX-I stained well with PNA, yet failed to stain with HPA (Fig. 3D). Interestingly, Western blot analysis of LOX cells stained with HPA revealed four to five major bands, in contrast to LSC and LS174T Tn+ cells, both of which displayed a large molecular weight distribution of HPA-positive bands. LOX cells also expressed both Tn and STn antigens, similar to LSC cells. By contrast, FEMX-I did not express either the Tn or STn antigens. These results suggest that these cells likely exhibit differential expression of mucins compared with colorectal tumor cells.
LOX cells had no detectable T-synthase activity, whereas FEMX-I cells had significant activity, demonstrating that the inability of LOX cells to produce functional Cosmc correlates with loss of T-synthase activity (Fig. 4A ). To define the role of Cosmc function in LOX cells, we transfected them with wtCosmc, which restored T-synthase activity (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, LOX cells transfected with wtCosmc also displayed decreased expression of Tn antigen expression and an increase in PNA binding as assessed by flow cytometry (Fig. 4B). Consistent with the activity of T-synthase in cells and flow cytometry results, the majority of LOX cells stably transfected with wtCosmc displayed Tn(–) phenotype, whereas mock LOX cells were uniformly Tn(+) by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 4C). By contrast, FEMX-I cells were Tn(–) (Fig. 4C). To further confirm the finding in Fig. 4C, LOX cells stably expressing wtCosmc were stained with both FITC-labeled PNA and Alexa568-labeled anti-Tn mAb. As shown in Fig. 4D, whereas mock-transfected LOX cells were stained uniformly by anti-Tn mAb in red, and not stained by PNA, only a few LOX cells transfected with wtCosmc were stained by anti-Tn mAb (red) whereas the majority of the cells were bound by PNA (green). Importantly, there was no overlap between the Tn(+) cells and PNA(+) cells (Fig. 4D), which is consistent with the interpretation that, in those cells transfected to express wtCosmc, the Tn antigen expression is lost while T-antigen expression is gained. Taken together, these results show that expression of wtCosmc in LOX cells causes restoration of T-synthase activity and restoration of normal O-glycan extension.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study represents the first report of altered Cosmc expression in human cancers. We chose to examine cervical cancer because it has been well documented that Tn and STn antigens are expressed in at least 60% of human cervical carcinomas and their expression is associated with the poor prognosis of the disease (27, 28). However, until now, there has been no genetic or biochemical basis for the expression of the Tn/STn antigens in human cancers. Human cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide (33). Most cervical cancers are caused by infection of human papillomavirus (HPV); HPV-16, HPV-18, and HPV-31 account for a vast majority of the cases (34). Understanding the genetic basis of the expression of Tn and STn should certainly shed light on developing novel diagnostic, prognostic, and, more importantly, therapeutic approaches against this disease. Whereas our studies should be viewed as very preliminary in nature, we have shown that, for those cervical tumor cells that are very positive for Tn/STn expression, mutations occur in Cosmc. One specimen contained mutations in Cosmc along with LOH, whereas the other specimen had LOH. Thus, our results show that LOH or deletion of Cosmc are among the molecular mechanisms accounting for Tn/STn expression in human cervical cancers. Several chromosomal regions, including 3p, 4p, 4q, 6p, 6q, 11q, 13q, 17q, and 18q, have been observed to have LOH associated with cervical cancer (35). Our preliminary result is the first report of a LOH on X-chromosome (Xq24) in human cervical cancer. Our results indicate that new studies with much larger numbers of patients are warranted to examine LOH and additional mutations for the Cosmc locus in patients with cervical cancer. In cervical cancer, we did not observe the same mutations as found in the tumor cell lines. This may be because they are derived from different type of tissues. However, many more tumor specimens will need to be examined in the future to better map out the types of mutations that occur in Cosmc and how they relate to those found in cell lines derived from human tumors.
The localization of Cosmc on the X-chromosome increases the sensitivity of cells to loss of this gene due to the presence of only one X-chromosome in males and the inactivation of one X-chromosome in female cells during embryonic development through methylation and condensation (36). Thus, adult female tissues are cellular mosaics with approximately half of the cells expressing the paternal X-chromosome and the other half expressing the maternal X-chromosome. Women who have a significant deviation from this 1:1 ratio are considered to have skewed X-chromosome inactivation, a condition associated with early development of lung and breast cancer (37). Thus, the key role of the Cosmc protein in T-synthase activity shown by this study, the frequent loss of T-synthase activity in cancer and metastases, and the localization of the Cosmc gene on the X-chromosome indicate that loss or mutation of the single Cosmc allele can contribute to tumorigenesis and metastases. This identifies Cosmc as a molecular target for diagnostic, prognostic, prevention, and treatment strategies.
The identification of novel neoplastic specific antigens or markers has been important in the diagnosis and treatment of neoplastic disease, and a wide variety of markers have been identified (38). However, whereas some of these markers have shown great promise and efficacy in treatment and diagnosis, such as Her2 and prostate-specific antigen; most have limited specificity and the genetic or epigenetic basis for the expression of most neoplastic antigens are unclear.
Altered expression of sialic acid on cell surface glycoproteins is associated with cancer cell invasiveness and metastasis (39). Previous studies have suggested that expression of STn antigen results from up-regulation of ST6GalNAc-I, the enzyme responsible for sialylating the Tn antigen (8, 40), although other studies failed to find a correlation between STn expression and expression of ST6GalNAc-I (41). More importantly, expression of the STn usually correlates with expression of the Tn antigen. These results are consistent with the known biochemical pathway for formation of the Tn and STn antigens, which requires the inaction of the T-synthase, which normally adds a galactose to the Tn antigen to create the disaccharide Galβ3GalNAc
-Ser/Thr (Fig. 6
). In this model, acquired or somatic mutations in the X-chromosome–encoded Cosmc in tumor cells or perhaps tumor stem cells would result in loss of Cosmc chaperone function and consequently the T-synthase protein is degraded in the proteasome (12, 13). The loss of the T-synthase results in Tn antigen expression and the capability of generating the STn antigen if the ST6GalNAc-I enzyme is also expressed. Complementation with wtCosmc causes loss of both Tn and STn expression, as we have shown. The lack of expression of the T-synthase in tumor cells is consistent with previous studies where the activity of the T-synthase was shown to be low in human breast tumors (42). In addition, it was recently reported that aging mouse fibrosarcoma cells that express the Tn antigen also contain a mutated form of Cosmc (43). Thus, in tumor cells expressing the Tn and STn antigens, there may be both loss of Cosmc function, leading to loss of T-synthase activity, and there may be up-regulation of expression for ST6GalNAc-I. The molecular basis for up-regulation of ST6GalNAc-I in tumor cells is unknown.
|
Altered O-glycosylation, such as expression of the Tn and STn antigens, may have many other biological consequences in cancer. Mucin-associated STn antigen can inhibit natural killer cell–induced cytotoxicity of target tumor cells (47). In some tumors, mucin expression and altered glycosylation correlates with expression of galectins, such as galectin-3 (48), a member of the galectin superfamily shown to bind Tn antigen, contributing to metastatic extravasation and regulation of the adaptive immune response. Expression of truncated O-glycans also correlates with altered expression of cell surface mucins and integrins and can change the adhesive properties of cells (49). Reduced O-glycan content may also render mucins more susceptible to metalloproteinases, favoring detachment, migration, altered interactions with adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin and P-selectin, and subsequent extravasation of neoplastic cells, ultimately contributing to metastasis. For example, we recently studied the roles of O-glycans in intestinal mucins, which express both core 1 and core 3 O-glycans. Genetic ablation of the core 3 β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (C3GnT) leads to loss of core 3 structures and increased susceptibility to colitis and colorectal tumor formation, which is also correlated with a deficiency of colon surface expressed MUC2 (50). Clearly, much remains to be done to fully elucidate the consequences of Tn and STn antigen expression in tumor-derived glycoproteins, but mechanistic evidence is accumulating to support the hypothesis that abnormal expression of O-glycans is associated with altered cellular properties, immune functions, and metastatic potential. Our findings of mutations in Cosmc in human tumor cells, coupled with the strong evidence that the Tn and STn antigens are commonly expressed by human carcinomas, strengthens the potential for using these antigens and the Cosmc gene as targets for the diagnosis and treatment of human neoplastic diseases.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank the late Dr. Georg F. Springer for the generous gift of the mouse anti-Tn monoclonal antibody, Dr. Steven Itzkowitz for providing the LSC cell line, Dr. Oystein Fodstad for providing the LOX and FEMX-I cell lines, and Drs. Jamie Heimburg and David F. Smith for helpful suggestions on the manuscript.
| Footnotes |
|---|
8 http://www.uscnorris.com/cpgislands2/cpg.aspx ![]()
Received 6/22/07. Revised 12/ 4/07. Accepted 1/20/08.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3/4 fucosyltransferases and Lewis determinants in ovarian carcinoma tissues and cell lines. Int J Oncol 2006;29:557–66.[Medline]
-R β 1–3Galactosyltransferase expression in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Biochem Biophys 1991;12:185–98.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Ju, R. P. Aryal, C. J. Stowell, and R. D. Cummings Regulation of protein O-glycosylation by the endoplasmic reticulum-localized molecular chaperone Cosmc J. Cell Biol., August 12, 2008; 182(3): 531 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Correction: Cosmc Mutation in Cancer Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 3076 - 3076. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |