Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Cancer Research 68, 2154, April 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5187
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Narod, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Narod, S. A.

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Frequency of the CHEK2 1100delC Mutation among Women with Breast Cancer: An International Study

Shiyu Zhang1, Catherine M. Phelan4, Phil Zhang1, Francois Rousseau5, Parviz Ghadirian6, Andre Robidoux7, William Foulkes8, Nancy Hamel8, David McCready2, Maureen Trudeau3, Henry Lynch9, Douglas Horsman10, Maria Lourdes Leon De Matsuda11, Zeba Aziz12, Magda Gomes13, Mauricio Magalhaes Costa14, Alexander Liede15, Aletta Poll1, Ping Sun1 and Steven A. Narod1

1 Women's College Research Institute and 2 Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto; 3 Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; 5 Departments of Medical Biology and Genetics, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada; 6 Epidemiology Research Unit, Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal and 7 Department of Surgery, Hotel-Dieu de Montreal, Universite de Montreal; 8 Departments of Genetics and Medical Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 9 Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska; 10 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 11 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines; 12 Department of Medical Oncology, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan; 13 Department of Oncology, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and Antonio Pedro University Hospital, Fluminense Federal University; 14 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and 15 Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California

Requests for reprints: Steven A. Narod, Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, 790 Bay Street, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1N8. Phone: 416-351-3765; Fax: 416-351-3767; E-mail: steven.narod{at}wchospital.ca.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A founder allele in the CHEK2 gene (1100delC) has been associated with an elevated risk of breast cancer. This allele is responsible for the majority of CHEK2-associated breast cancers in women from northern European countries; however, within Europe, it seems to be rare in countries that are close to the Mediterranean. The frequency of the 1100delC allele has not been measured in non-White populations. We measured the frequency of the CHEK2 founder allele in 3,882 breast cancer patients and 8,609 controls from various countries. The allele was not seen among Asian patients (from Pakistan or the Philippines) and was present in 1 of 155 cases from Brazil. Among White women, the allele was present in 1.5% of 825 familial cases of breast cancer and in 0.7% of 1,106 patients with nonfamilial breast cancer. The allele was equally frequent in Jewish and non-Jewish patients. We estimate that the CHEK2 1100delC allele is associated with an odds ratio of 2.6 for breast cancer, which corresponds to a lifetime risk of ~24% in Ontario. [Cancer Res 2008;68(7):2154–7]


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Following the positional cloning of BRCA1 in 1994 (1) and of BRCA2 in 1995 (2), there has been continued interest in the identification of new genes for hereditary breast cancer. These genes may be roughly divided into two categories—genes with rare alleles, which are associated with a high relative risk of breast cancer (i.e., highly penetrant), and genes with relatively common alleles, which are associated with modest relative risks of breast cancer (i.e., low penetrance genes). It has been suggested that genes in the latter class might account for significant proportion of cancers in the general population.

CHEK2 is one of a few genes that have been clearly associated with an elevated breast cancer risk. A founder allele of CHEK2 (1100delC) predisposes to breast cancer in Europe and North America (3, 4) and other CHEK2 alleles have been implicated in breast carcinogenesis in Finland (5) and in Poland (6). In the initial CHEK2 study, the 1100delC variant was found in 5.1% of individuals with familial breast cancer (but with no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation), compared with 1.1% of healthy control subjects (3). In a large follow-up study, 10,860 breast cancer cases from five countries (United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Finland, Germany, and Australia) were studied (4). The highest prevalence of the 1100delC mutation was found among cases from the Netherlands (3.5%) followed by Finland (2.2%), the United Kingdom (1.2%), Germany (0.8%), and Australia (0.7%). The frequencies among controls also varied widely, from 1.8% in the Netherlands to 0.1% in Australia. Elsewhere, the mutation frequency has been estimated to be 0.5% in cases from Poland (6) and 0% in cases from Spain (7). As a whole, these studies suggest that the frequency of the 1100delC mutation varies between countries and that the highest mutation rates are seen in northern European countries. To date, no studies have been conducted in non-European populations. We estimated the prevalence of the CHEK2 1100delC mutation in 3,882 breast cancer patients belonging to various ethnic groups, including women from Asia and South America.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNA samples were available from women who presented for genetic evaluation to the Women's College Research Institute in Toronto. We also included women who were enrolled in a number of breast cancer studies. For some studies, patients were unselected hospital-based cases of breast cancer. For other studies, patients were preselected on the basis of age of diagnosis, family history, ethnic group, or personal history of cancer. The study was given ethical approval at the Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, and all patients provide written informed consent.

In addition, 8,609 controls were tested. These women were unaffected with breast cancer. A large number of controls were women who attended a screening clinic for healthy women at Women's College Hospital or were female students who attended the University of Toronto. For some hospital-based studies, a control group of non–breast cancer patients was also collected and was available for study. French Canadian controls consisted of DNA extracted from cord blood specimens from unselected newborn infants from the Quebec City region (8). Detailed information on ethnic group was taken from all cases and controls, and individuals were classified according to ethnic group: White women were divided into Ashkenazi Jewish, French Canadian, and other White.

The genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood with PureGene DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems) according to the protocol provided. Two sets of PCR primers were used to screen for the CHEK2 1100de1C mutation. Specific primers for the CHEK2 exon 10 on chromosome 22 were designed to avoid all other homologous sequences in the genome (forward primer 5'-TTAATTTAAGCAAAATTAAATGTC-3': reverse primer 5'-GGCATGGTGGTGTGCATC-3'). The PCR products were then re-amplified with nested primers, which were designed to amplify the region encompassing the site of CHEK2 1100delC. The forward primer contained one base substitution to generate a restriction site for restriction enzyme ScaI within the wild-type allele after PCR amplification. The forward primer sequence was 5'-CCCTTTTGTACTGAATTTTAGAGTA-3' (a T to G substitution at position 1097). The reverse primer was 5'-ACAAGAACTTCAGGCGCCAAGTAG-3. Then, the 116-bp PCR products from the second amplification were digested with the restriction enzyme ScaI and incubated overnight at 37°C (2.5 units per sample, Roche Molecular Biochemicals), which digests only the wild-type allele but not the mutant allele. Restriction enzyme digest products were separated on 3% agarose gels visualized with ethidium bromide. The wild-type allele is cut into bands of 92 and 24 bp (the 24-bp band usually runs out off the gel). The mutant allele cannot be cut by the enzyme. Mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing with Cy5/Cy5.5 Dye Primer Cycle Sequencing Kit and OpenGene Automated DNA Sequencing System (Visible Genetics).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
A total of 3,882 women with breast cancer was tested for the 1100delC CHEK2 mutation. The women were participants in a number of different studies that were designed to estimate the frequencies of various cancer-predisposing alleles in various populations. In some studies, patients were unselected, but for others, patients were selected on the basis of ethnic group, age of diagnosis, a positive family history of cancer, or a personal history of cancer. Therefore, the results are presented separately for the different ethnic groups and for subgroups defined by age of onset, family history, and past cancer history.

A mutation was found in 23 of 2,449 (0.9%) White breast cancer patients. These 23 women were almost all from North America (with European origins). Among Whites, the mutation frequencies were similar for French Canadian patients (0.7%; 4 of 560), Jewish patients (1.3%; 4 of 320), and White women of other ethnic origins (1.0%; 15 of 1,566); the frequency of the mutation in unselected controls was 0.3% for both the French Canadian and other White groups. There was no mutation detected among the Jewish controls, but this sample was relatively small (n = 180).

Brazilian women represent a mixed group, with ancestors of African, Portuguese, Hispanic, and other European origins. One mutation was found among 155 Brazilian patients (0.7%). No mutation was seen among 718 Asian patients (342 Filipino, 376 Pakistani). The mutation prevalences and odds ratios for breast cancer for the different ethnic groups are presented in Table 1 . A detailed analysis of the ethnicity of the CHEK2-positive families revealed a dominance of families of English, Scottish, and Irish descent (12 of 28 families; Table 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. CHEK2 1100delC mutations in breast cancer cases and controls by ethnicity

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Description of cases with CHEK2 mutations

 
Because the 1100delC mutation seemed to be limited to White patients, the remaining analyses are restricted to 2,449 White women with breast cancer (Brazil excluded). The prevalence of mutations in White breast cancer patients, categorized by age and family history, are presented in Table 3 . Among the White patients, 825 women had a family history of breast cancer (one or more first- or second-degree relatives with breast cancer) and 1,106 had no family history. Family history data was missing from 518 cases. White women with familial breast cancer were five times more likely to harbor a CHEK2 mutation than were White controls (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-10.5; P < 0.0001). White women with nonfamilial breast cancer were 2.6 times more likely to harbor a mutation than were unaffected White controls (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.8; P = 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. CHEK2 mutations by age and family history, White women

 
Of the White women, 1,588 had previously been tested for the presence of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (Table 4 ). No CHEK2 mutation was seen among 307 breast cancer patients with a BRCA mutation. The prevalences of CHEK2 mutations were 1.4% among those women with no BRCA mutation detected (18 of 1,280) and 0.5% among those who were untested for BRCA mutations (4 of 858). Among the familial cases without a BRCA mutation, the prevalence of CHEK2 mutations was 2.4% (11 of 453).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4. CHEK2 mutations by BRCA status and by multiple primary cancer status, White women only (n = 2,449)

 
One proband was homozygous for the CHEK 1100delC mutation. Homozygosity was confirmed by two assays, first by the restriction enzyme assay and subsequently by DNA sequencing. The proband was diagnosed with bilateral breast cancer (ages 47 and 61 years) and with uterine sarcoma at age 58 years.

We examined the family histories of the 28 probands with a CHEK2 mutation. Sixteen of the probands with a mutation had a positive family history of breast cancer (58%). We identified 51 cases of breast cancer among the first-, second-, and third-degree relatives of the 28 probands. Of these, 11 were tested for the CHEK2 mutation (the others were unavailable for testing or were deceased). Only 5 of the 11 affected relatives who were tested for CHEK2 were also positive for the mutation.

A mutation was present in 1.2% of women diagnosed with breast cancer under the age of 50 years, versus 0.6% of women diagnosed after the age of 50 years (P = 0.14). One hundred thirty-seven of the 2,449 patients had multiple primary breast cancers (5.6%), and 359 patients had cancer at a second site (14.7%). The frequency of CHEK2 mutations in women with multiple primary breast cancer (0.7%) was similar to that of women with a single case of breast cancer (0.8%). The frequency of the 1100delC mutation in women with breast cancer and another cancer was 1.7% (odds ratio, 2.1; P = 0.13).

In summary, White ethnicity, age of onset below age 50 years, and a positive cancer family history were risk factors for the presence of a CHEK2 mutation. Mutations were equally frequent in women with unilateral and bilateral breast cancer and were not found in women with a BRCA mutation.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We estimated the prevalence of the CHEK2 1100delC mutation in breast cancer patients from various ethnic groups. The first goal of this study was to identify populations for which appreciable numbers of women with breast cancer carry the CHEK2 1100delC allele and which might benefit from genetic testing. Our second goal was to estimate the magnitude of the risk increase associated with this single mutation in these populations. We included patients from several Asian countries and from Brazil. We did not identify a mutation in patients from Pakistan and the Philippines (therefore, controls from these countries were not tested). The founder mutation was restricted to women of European origin, including Ashkenazi Jews and French Canadian women. The mutation was found in a single woman from Brazil (of mixed European ancestry). This particular mutation is the most important founder allele in European countries and other CHEK2 variants do not seem to make a substantial contribution to breast cancer susceptibility in western Europe or North America (9–11). However, it is possible that other CHEK2 variants are responsible for the predisposition in other countries. For example, a splice-site mutation in CHEK2 IVS2+G>A has been found to be associated with breast cancer predisposition in Poland (12), and, in Ashkenazi Jewish women, the CHEK2 S428F variant increases breast cancer risk by ~2-fold (13).

The observed relative risk of breast cancer associated with the 1100delC mutation in White women with familial breast cancer was ~5-fold. However, the 1100delC allele did not segregate completely with the presence of breast cancer in the families. Incomplete segregation is characteristic of two-gene models for cancer and can be an impediment to gene mapping through linkage analysis (14). For studies of genes in this class, it may be best to conduct association studies of familial cases. For familial cases, the odds ratio was about 5 and an effect of this size is amenable to an association study, even if the allele frequency is relatively rare. However, it is important to note, for counseling purposes, that observing a 5-fold risk does not imply that unaffected women from these same families face a 5-fold risk of breast cancer; their lifetime risk is actually similar to that estimated for nonfamilial cases (below). The observed odds ratio of 5 is a consequence of the case-control design—that is, any gene which is associated with a substantial increase in the risk of breast cancer is more likely to be present in a familial case than in a nonfamilial case because it will result in familial aggregation; for example, if a genetic variant doubles the risk of breast cancer in whomever it is present, it is more likely to be present in a patient with an affected sister than in a singleton case.

From our nonfamilial cases, we estimate a relative risk of 2.6 associated with the 1100delC mutation. Based on the risk to age 74 years for breast cancer in Ontario of 9% (15), this corresponds to a penetrance of roughly 23% penetrance to age 74 years. Previously, the increased risk for breast cancer associated with the CHEK2 1100delC mutation has been estimated at between 1.4- and 4.7-fold. In a similar study of unselected breast cancer cases from New York, Offit and colleagues (11) found the frequency of the allele among 300 cases to be 1.0% and among 1,665 controls to be 0.3%. These figures are similar to ours. In Offit et al.'s study and ours, there was no difference in the allele frequency between Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi controls. Because of the penetrance of ~25%, and because most of these breast cancer are estrogen receptor positive, some authors have advocated that unaffected CHEK2 carriers be offered tamoxifen as chemoprevention (16).

In previous studies, patients with a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were excluded from CHEK2 analysis under the premise that the familial predisposition had been explained. Our data are consistent with this assumption; we found no CHEK2 mutation in 307 White women with breast cancer and a BRCA mutation. It is unlikely that women with a BRCA mutation will be found to harbor a CHEK2 mutation. However, it is impractical to offer screening for CHEK2 as a standalone genetic test; it is better to add the test for selected CHEK2 mutations as part of a wider mutation screen, at least for patients with breast cancer from women with northern and eastern European origins. The additional cost for adding this single allele to a mutation panel is minimal, and a single-step multiallelic approach is more practical than a sequential approach. Our study was of a single allele of CHEK2—it is possible that this allele is very rare in non-European populations but that other CHEK2 alleles may be founder alleles elsewhere. It is important that ethnic-specific studies be conducted in different populations of breast cancer patients to confirm or exclude CHEK2 as a contributing factor.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance, the Canadian Genetic Diseases Network, and the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Ontario chapter).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the families for their participation in this research study, and the clinicians and genetic counselors who contributed data to the study.

Received 9/ 5/07. Revised 11/27/07. Accepted 1/15/08.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994;266:66–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995;378:789–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J, et al. Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Genet 2002;31:55–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. CHEK2 Breast Cancer Case-Control Consortium. CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2004;4:1175–82.
  5. Vahteristo P, Bartkova J, Eerola H, et al. A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:432–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Cybulski C, Gorski B, Huzarski T, et al. CHEK2 is a multi-organ cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:1131–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Osorio A, Rodriguez-Lopez R, Diez O, et al. The breast cancer low-penetrance allele 1100delC in the CHEK2 gene is not present in Spanish familial breast cancer population. Int J Cancer 2004;108:54–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Giroux S, Dube-Linteau A, Cardinal G, et al. Assessment of the prevalence of the 985A>G MCAD mutation in the French-Canadian population using allele-specific PCR. Clin Genet 2007;71:569–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Schutte M, Seal S, Barfoot R, et al. Variants in CHEK2 other than 1100delC do not make a major contribution to breast cancer susceptibility. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:1023–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Kuschel B, Auranen A, Gregory CS, et al. Common polymorphisms in checkpoint kinase 2 are not associated with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:809–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Offit K, Pierce H, Kirchhoff T, et al. Frequency of CHEK2*1100 delC in New York breast cancer patients. BMC Med Genet 2003;4:1.[Medline]
  12. Cybulski C, Wokoloroczyk D, Huzarski T, et al. A deletion in CHEK2 of 5,395 bp predisposes to breast cancer in Poland. Breast Cancer Res Treatment 2007;102:119–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Shaag A, Walsh T, Renbaum P, et al. Functional and genomic approaches reveal an ancient CHEK2 allele associated with breast cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:555–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cybulski C, Gliniewicz B, Sikorski A, et al. Epistatic relationship between the cancer susceptibility genes CHEK2 and p27. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:572–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, et al., editors. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol III. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications; 2002.
  16. Narod SA, Lynch HT. CHEK2 mutation and hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:6–7.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
C Cybulski, B Gorski, T Huzarski, T Byrski, J Gronwald, T Debniak, D Wokolorczyk, A Jakubowska, P Serrano-Fernandez, T Dork, et al.
Effect of CHEK2 missense variant I157T on the risk of breast cancer in carriers of other CHEK2 or BRCA1 mutations
J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2009; 46(2): 132 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Narod, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Narod, S. A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online