| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mathematical Oncology |
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; 2Department of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; Departments of 3Mathematics and 4Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California; 5School of Health Information Sciences, 6Division of Nanomedicine, and 7Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas Health Science Center; Departments of 8Experimental Therapeutics and 9Systems Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; 10Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; 11Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas; 12Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; and 13USC Center for Applied Molecular Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: vittorio.cristini{at}uth.tmc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
Clinical outcome prognostication in oncology is a guiding principle in therapeutic choice. A wealth of qualitative empirical evidence links disease progression with tumor morphology, histopathology, invasion, and associated molecular phenomena. However, the quantitative contribution of each of the known parameters in this progression remains elusive. Mathematical modeling can provide the capability to quantify the connection between variables governing growth, prognosis, and treatment outcome. By quantifying the link between the tumor boundary morphology and the invasive phenotype, this work provides a quantitative tool for the study of tumor progression and diagnostic/prognostic applications. This establishes a framework for monitoring system perturbation towards development of therapeutic strategies and correlation to clinical outcome for prognosis. [Cancer Res 2009;69(10):OF1–9]
Key Words: tumor invasion, clinical outcome prognostication, computer simulation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Enderling, A. R.A. Anderson, M. A.J. Chaplain, A. Beheshti, L. Hlatky, and P. Hahnfeldt Paradoxical Dependencies of Tumor Dormancy and Progression on Basic Cell Kinetics Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 69(22): 8814 - 8821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |