| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
er 35,
1Department of Nephrology, Section of Preventive Medicine, 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, and 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany; 4Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, 5Taussig Cancer Institute, 6Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research Institute, and 7Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; 8Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Center, Madrid and ISCIII Center for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain; 9Instituto Universitario de Oncologia del Principado de Asturias and 10Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital U. Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; 11Veneto Institute of Oncology (IRCCS) and 12Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; 13Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza-Rome, Italy; 14Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; 15Department of Endocrinology and Biochemistry, University Hospital, CHRU, Lille, France; 16Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Head and Neck Surgery, International Neuroscience Institute, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; 17Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; 18Cancer Genetics, Kolling Institute of Medical Research & Department of Endocrinology, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney and 19Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; 20Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Carl-Gustav-Carus University, Dresden, Germany; 21Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany; 22Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; 23Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; 24Department of Hypertension, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland; 25Department of Endocrinology, Greenlane Clinical Centre, Auckland, New Zealand; 26Institute of Otolaryngology AMS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine; 27Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Städtische Kliniken, Fulda, Germany; 28Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Adultes Brabois, Nancy, France; 29Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany; 30Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany; 31Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 32Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of München-Grosshadern; 33Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medizinische Klinik-Innenstadt, University Hospital Munich, München, Germany; 34Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Köln, Köln, Germany; 35Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helios-Kliniken, Erfurt, Germany; 36Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; 37Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany; 38Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany; 39Department of Endocrinology, Mainz, Germany; 40Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany; 41Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 42Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; 43Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 44Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Friedrich-Wilhelm University, Bonn, Germany; 45Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Phoniatry and Pedaudiology, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany; 46Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Krankenhaus der Borromäerinnen, Trier, Germany; 47Division of Endocrinology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; 48Department of Otolaryngology, Pozna'n University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; 49Eberhard Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Dortmund, Germany; and 50Department of Human Genetics, University Medical Center, Rheinisch Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen, Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hartmut.neumann{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
Multiple genes and their variants that lend susceptibility to many diseases will play a major role in clinical routine. Genetics-based cost reduction strategies in diagnostic processes are important in the setting of multiple susceptibility genes for a single disease. Head and neck paraganglioma (HNP) is caused by germline mutations of at least three succinate dehydrogenase subunit genes (SDHx). Mutation analysis for all 3 costs
US$2,700 per patient. Genetic classification is essential for downstream management of the patient and preemptive management of family members. Utilizing HNP as a model, we wanted to determine predictors to prioritize the most heritable clinical presentations and which gene to begin testing in HNP presentations, to reduce costs of genetic screening. Patients were tested for SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD intragenic mutations and large deletions. Clinical parameters were analyzed as potential predictors for finding germline mutations. Cost reduction was calculated between prioritized gene testing compared with that for all genes. Of 598 patients, 30.6% had SDHx germline mutations: 34.4% in SDHB, 14.2% SDHC, and 51.4% SDHD. Predictors for an SDHx mutation are family history [odds ratio (OR), 37.9], previous pheochromocytoma (OR, 10.9), multiple HNP (OR, 10.6), age
40 years (OR, 4.0), and male gender (OR, 3.5). By screening only preselected cases and a stepwise approach, 60% cost reduction can be achieved, with 91.8% sensitivity and 94.5% negative predictive value. Our data give evidence that clinical parameters can predict for mutation and help prioritize gene testing to reduce costs in HNP. Such strategy is cost-saving in the practice of genetics-based personalized health care. [Cancer Res 2009;69(8):3650–6]
Key Words: paraganglioma, pheochromocytoma, genetic diagnosis, molecular genetics, hereditary cancer disease
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Erlic, L. Rybicki, M. Peczkowska, H. Golcher, P. H. Kann, M. Brauckhoff, K. Mussig, M. Muresan, A. Schaffler, N. Reisch, et al. Clinical Predictors and Algorithm for the Genetic Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma Patients Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2009; 15(20): 6378 - 6385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. H. Neumann and C. Eng The Approach to the Patient with Paraganglioma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2009; 94(8): 2677 - 2683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Boedeker, Z. Erlic, S. Richard, U. Kontny, A.-P. Gimenez-Roqueplo, A. Cascon, M. Robledo, J. M. de Campos, F. H. van Nederveen, R. R. de Krijger, et al. Head and Neck Paragangliomas in Von Hippel-Lindau Disease and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1938 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |