Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Focus on Computer Resources
    • 75th Anniversary
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Focus on Computer Resources
    • 75th Anniversary
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Advances in Brief

E7-transduced Human Breast Epithelial Cells Show Partial Differentiation in Three-dimensional Culture

Kimberly M. Spancake, Christine B. Anderson, Valerie M. Weaver, Norisada Matsunami, Mina J. Bissell and Raymond L. White
Kimberly M. Spancake
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [K. M. S., C. B. A., N. M., R. L. W.], and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 [V. M. W., M. J. B.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine B. Anderson
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [K. M. S., C. B. A., N. M., R. L. W.], and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 [V. M. W., M. J. B.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valerie M. Weaver
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [K. M. S., C. B. A., N. M., R. L. W.], and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 [V. M. W., M. J. B.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norisada Matsunami
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [K. M. S., C. B. A., N. M., R. L. W.], and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 [V. M. W., M. J. B.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mina J. Bissell
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [K. M. S., C. B. A., N. M., R. L. W.], and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 [V. M. W., M. J. B.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raymond L. White
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [K. M. S., C. B. A., N. M., R. L. W.], and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720 [V. M. W., M. J. B.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published December 1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Disruption of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor pathway is a common and important event in breast carcinogenesis. To examine the role of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) in this process, we created human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) deficient for pRB by infecting primary outgrowth from breast organoids with the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E7 gene. HPV16 E7 binds to and inactivates pRB and also causes a significant down-regulation of the protein. Culturing normal HMEC in a reconstituted basement membrane (rBM) provides a correct environment and signaling cues for the formation of differentiated, acini-like structures. When cultured in this rBM, HMEC+E7 were found to respond morphologically as normal HMEC and form acinar structures. In contrast to normal HMEC, many of the cells within the HMEC+E7 structures were not growth arrested, as determined by a 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine incorporation assay. pRB deficiency did not affect polarization of these structures, as indicated by the normal localization of the cell-cell adhesion marker E-cadherin and the basal deposition of a collagen IV membrane. However, in HMEC+E7 acini, we were unable to detect by immunofluorescence microscopy the milk protein lactoferrin or cytokeratin 19, both markers of differentiation expressed in the normal HMEC structures. These data suggest that loss of RB in vivo would compromise differentiation, predisposing these cells to future tumor-promoting actions.

Introduction

The tumor suppressor gene RB 3 can play a significant role in breast carcinogenesis. RB has been shown to be inactivated in 19% of human breast tumors and 25% of human breast carcinoma cell lines (1 , 2) . Other members of the RB regulatory network have also been reported as having aberrant expression in a significant number of breast carcinomas. For example, cyclin D1, which through regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk4 phosphorylates and inactivates pRB, is overexpressed in 35% of breast tumors (3) . The p16 protein, also a regulator of pRB activity through inhibition of Cdk4, is absent in 40% of breast tumors, as determined by immunohistochemical analysis (4) . Additionally, restoration of pRB expression in human breast cancer cell lines lacking functional pRB has been shown to cause a reduction in the cells’ tumorigenicity (5) . These data suggest that disruption of the RB regulatory network is a common and important step in breast carcinogenesis.

In addition to the cellular inactivation of pRB by cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases, several DNA tumor virus proteins abrogate pRB activity by binding to and functionally sequestering pRB. The HPV16 E7 protein not only inactivates pRB function by binding but also enhances degradation of pRB through ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis (6) .

HPV16 E7 was shown previously to immortalize early passage HMEC in culture (7) , suggesting a critical role in growth regulation for pRB in vivo. Disruption of such fundamental growth control mechanisms should generate cell populations predisposed for transformation. To create a pRB-deficient cell line, we infected primary breast epithelial cell outgrowth with a retrovirus expressing the HPV16 E7 gene (HMEC+E7). In this study, only early passage, G418-resistant, precrisis HMEC+E7 cells were examined. To characterize the impact of this pRB deficiency, we used a sensitive three-dimensional culture assay shown previously to support the formation of spheroid structures that resemble breast acini (8) . Culturing human, luminal breast epithelial cells in a rBM provides an environment that supports not only organogenesis but also formation of endogenous BM necessary for differentiation (9) . This culture system can also be used to distinguish between normal and cancer cells because of the inability of the transformed cells to organize into acinar structures (10) .

We examined the effect of pRB deficiency on structure formation, cell-cell interactions, and differentiation by culturing the cells in a rBM. Our data demonstrate that even in the absence of functional pRB, human breast epithelial cells organize and form morphologically typical acini-like structures. Furthermore, in these pRB-deficient structures, proper localization of E-cadherin and deposition of a collagen IV BM, both markers of organogenesis, were found. However, unlike normal HMEC, the structures formed by HMEC+E7 do not exit the cell cycle and are deficient for the expression of cyto-keratin 19 and lactoferrin, two proteins associated with the differentiation of luminal breast epithelial cells. These data suggest that pRB is not necessary for the transmission of signals from the extracellular matrix that convey information necessary for structure formation, but pRB does appear to be necessary for cell cycle withdrawal and expression of some proteins normally present in the differentiated luminal epithelial cell. Our data suggest that the initial loss of RB in vivo would not predispose breast epithelial cells to an apoptotic or immediate transformed fate, but rather loss of pRB activity would contribute to a less differentiated cellular state that, in turn, may eventually lead to a malignant phenotype.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture and Retroviral Infection.

Surgical discard material from reduction mammoplasties was minced with opposing scalpels, placed in digestion buffer, and incubated in spinner flasks at 37°C until stroma dissolved (∼3–5 h). Digestion buffer contained 1 unit/ml Collagenase D (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN), 2.4 units/ml dispase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 6.25 units/ml DNase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in Dulbecco’s PBS. The digested material plus 10% FCS was centrifuged at 800 rpm for 10 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in wash buffer (11) , and the organoids were separated from stromal and blood cells by sequential sedimentation at 1 × g. Organoids were cultured immediately or frozen in DMEM: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (Ham) 1:1 (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), 10% FCS, and 10% DMSO. Organoids were cultured on plastic in CDM3 culture medium (12) for primary breast epithelial cell outgrowth and subculture. Primary epithelial outgrowth was infected with an LXSN retroviral construct containing the HPV16 E7 gene (LXSN16E7; Ref. 13 ). HMEC were incubated with LXSN16E7 in CDM3 plus 4 μg/ml Polybrene (Sigma) for 24 h. Viral supernatant was aspirated, and HMEC were cultured in virus-free CDM3 for 48 h prior to selection in CDM3 containing 50 μg/ml Geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.). Early-passage HMEC (either passage one or two) and HMEC containing LXSN16E7 (HMEC+E7) were cultured in a rBM, Matrigel (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA), as described previously (10) . Briefly, 2.5 × 105 HMEC were resuspended as single cells in 300 μl of 10 mg/ml Matrigel per well and plated onto Nunc four-well multidishes coated with 100 μl of Matrigel. Matrigel cultures were overlaid with 500 μl of CDM3.

Western Blot Analysis.

HMEC and HMEC+E7 cultured in polystyrene flasks were scraped in lysis buffer (PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% NP40, 0.2 mg/ml Pefablock, 0.01 mg/ml aprotinin, 0.01 mg/ml pepstatin, 0.01 mg/ml leupeptin, 20 mm sodium fluoride, and 1 mm sodium orthovanadate) and sonicated for 30 s on ice. HMEC and HMEC+E7 cultured in rBM for 10 days were liberated from the Matrigel by incubation with dispase (Becton Dickinson) for 1 h at 37°C. The acini were then washed with PBS plus 5 mm EDTA, resuspended in lysis buffer, homogenized for 10 s, and sonicated for 30 s on ice. Protein lysates from cells cultured on plastic or in Matrigel were boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer for 3 min, and 50 μg of total protein were resolved on 4–12% gradient acrylamide Tris-Glycine gels (Novex, San Diego, CA) by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). Immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously (14) . Antibodies were used in the following concentrations: RB (mouse IgG1, G3-245) 1:400 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), cytokeratin 19 (mouse IgG1, RCK 108) 1:100 (DAKO), and horseradish peroxidase-goat antimouse (Sigma) 1:30,000.

Immunofluorescence.

Ten-day HMEC and HMEC+E7 rBM cultures were fixed, frozen, and cut into 5-μm sections as described previously (15) . Antibodies were used in the following concentrations: E-cadherin (mouse IgG2a, 36) 1:100 (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), collagen IV (mouse IgG1, CIV 22) 1:50 (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), cytokeratin 18 (mouse IgG1, CY-90) 1:800 (Sigma), lactoferrin (rabbit sera) 1:50 (Zymed, San Francisco, CA), cytokeratin 19 (mouse IgG1, RCK 108) 1:100 (DAKO), goat antimouse IgG1-FITC 1:200 (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL), Alexa 488 goat antimouse IgG (H+L), F(ab′)2 fragment conjugate 1:1000 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and goat antirabbit-Texas Red 1:200 (Accurate Chemical and Scientific, Westbury, NY). Nuclei were counterstained with 100 ng/ml DAPI (Sigma) or TO-PRO-3 1:750 (Molecular Probes).

Proliferation Assay.

rBM cultures were prepared as above with the following exceptions. Ten μm BrdUrd was added to the culture medium 12 h prior to freezing the culture without fixative. Cryosections were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min, followed by a 30-min incubation in 2 m HCl, all performed at room temperature. Staining proceeded as above using anti-BrdUrd (mouse IgG1, BMC9318) 1:10 and sheep antimouse immunoglobulin-FITC 1:10 (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Slides were scored visually (∼200 cells/experiment) for BrdUrd-labeled nuclei, and indices were calculated by expressing this number as a percentage of the total nuclei scored (10) .

Results

HMEC expressing HPV16 E7 Show a Decrease in pRB Expression.

Primary epithelial outgrowth from normal human organoids was infected with a retroviral construct expressing the HPV16 E7 gene. HMEC+E7 were selected by culturing the cells in CDM3 growth medium containing Geneticin. To determine the effect of HPV16 E7 expression on pRB, HMEC and HMEC+E7 were examined by Western immunoblot analysis. Fig. 1 ⇓ shows the expression level of pRB in the normal, parental HMEC when cultured on plastic. In contrast, HMEC+E7 showed a significant decrease in pRB. This down-regulation of pRB is in agreement with previous results demonstrating the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of pRB in the presence of HPV16 E7 (6) .

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Western blot analysis of pRB in normal and HPV16 E7-expressing breast epithelial cells. Protein lysates from HMEC and HMEC+E7 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with a monoclonal anti-pRB antibody. pRB is present in the normal HMEC, but the level of expression is reduced in HMEC+E7.

HMEC+E7 Form Acinar Structures When Cultured in Extracellular Matrix But Are Not Growth Arrested.

Both normal HMEC and HMEC+E7 were cultured in rBM. By 10 days in culture, normal HMEC organized into differentiated acini ∼55 μm in diameter (Fig. 2A) ⇓ . A 5-μm frozen section of a representative structure stained with DAPI revealed a ring of basally located nuclei (Fig. 2B) ⇓ . HMEC+E7 also formed morphologically normal-appearing acinar structures when cultured in rBM (Fig. 2C) ⇓ . The HMEC+E7 acini were similar in size to the parental structures, although DAPI staining revealed somewhat larger and slightly less organized nuclei (Fig. 2D) ⇓ . Additionally, HMEC acini had growth arrested, as determined by minor BrdUrd incorporation similar to levels reported previously (15) ; however, a significant increase in BrdUrd labeling was observed in HMEC+E7 (Fig. 2E) ⇓ .

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

HMEC+E7 cultured in extracellular matrix form acinar structures that are not growth arrested. Breast cells were cultured in a rBM for 10 days. A and C, phase contrast images of representative HMEC (A) and HMEC+E7 (C) structures. B and D, frozen sections of HMEC (B) and HMEC+E7 (D) acini stained with DAPI. HMEC+E7 cultured in rBM formed structures morphologically similar to HMEC, although the nuclei appear larger and slightly less organized. Percentage of BrdUrd labeling in HMEC and HMEC+E7 structures is expressed as the BrdUrd labeling index from three separate experiments (E; bars, SD). Approximately 90% of HMEC were growth arrested as compared with HMEC+E7 that continued to synthesize DNA. Bar, 20 μm.

Normal Localization of E-cadherin and Type IV Collagen in HMEC+E7 Acinar Structures.

HMEC+E7 were examined for the expression of proteins shown previously to have distinctive localization patterns characteristic of organogenesis in normal HMEC acini (15) . HMEC and HMEC+E7 rBM cultures were fixed, frozen, cut into 5-μm sections, and stained with the indicated primary antibodies and corresponding secondary antibodies. In normal HMEC acinar structures, the cell-cell adhesion protein E-cadherin was localized to points of cell-cell contact (Fig. 3A) ⇓ . This same pattern of E-cadherin expression at points of cell-cell contact was present in the HMEC+E7 structures (Fig. 3B) ⇓ . Collagen IV was basally deposited in a continuous BM surrounding the normal HMEC structures when cultured in rBM (Fig. 3C) ⇓ . HMEC+E7 acini also deposited a basal collagen IV-containing BM (Fig. 3D) ⇓ .

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Localization of E-cadherin and collagen IV in HMEC and HMEC+E7 using immunofluorescence microscopy. A and B, frozen sections of HMEC and HMEC+E7 acini, respectively, were stained with a monoclonal anti-E-cadherin antibody, Alexa 488 goat antimouse IgG (H+L), F(ab′)2 fragment conjugate, and the nuclei were counterstained with TO-PRO-3. Confocal fluorescence microscopy showed E-cadherin localization at points of cell-cell contact (A and B, arrows). C and D, frozen sections of HMEC and HMEC+E7 acini, respectively, were stained with a monoclonal anti-collagen IV antibody and goat antimouse IgG1-FITC. Collagen IV was localized in a continuous BM (arrowheads) at the basal surface of HMEC (C) and HMEC+E7 (D) structures. Bar, 20 μm.

Lactoferrin and Cytokeratin 19 Are Not Expressed in Structurally Differentiated HMEC+E7.

The proteins lactoferrin and cytokeratin 19 are markers for differentiation in luminal breast epithelial cells (16, 17, 18) . HMEC and HMEC+E7 were prepared as described above and examined for the expression of lactoferrin and cytokeratin 19. HMEC and HMEC+E7 acinar structures were identified by the presence of the luminal marker cytokeratin 18 (Fig. 4A and B ⇓ , respectively) and the absence of the myoepithelial marker cytokeratin 14 (data not shown). Lactoferrin is an iron-binding milk protein that was expressed in the normal HMEC acini (Fig. 4C) ⇓ . In contrast, immunofluorescence analysis of HMEC+E7 structures demonstrated the absence of lactoferrin (Fig. 4D) ⇓ . As expected, structures derived from normal HMEC expressed the luminal differentiation marker cyto-keratin 19 (Fig. 4E) ⇓ . HMEC+E7 acini, however, were deficient for the expression of cytokeratin 19 (Fig. 4F) ⇓ . These immunofluorescence data were confirmed by Western immunoblot analysis of HMEC and HMEC+E7 acinar structures, which showed barely detectable levels of cytokeratin 19 in HMEC+E7 (Fig. 4G) ⇓ .

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Expression of cytokeratin 18, lactoferrin, and cytokeratin 19 in HMEC and HMEC+E7 acinar structures using immunofluorescence microscopy and Western immunoblot analysis. A and B, frozen sections of HMEC and HMEC+E7, respectively, were stained with a monoclonal cytokeratin 18 antibody and goat antimouse IgG1-FITC to confirm that structures were of luminal origin. Frozen sections of HMEC (C and E) and HMEC+E7 (D and F) were stained for lactoferrin (C and D), cytokeratin 19 (E and F), and the nuclei were visualized with a DAPI counterstain (C and D). Protein lysates from HMEC and HMEC+E7 acinar structures were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with a monoclonal anti-cytokeratin 19 antibody (G). HMEC+E7 acinar structures were deficient for both lactoferrin and cytokeratin 19 expression. Bar, 20 μm.

Discussion

HMEC+E7 are deficient for pRB, a key protein governing cell cycle regulation and differentiation; thus, formation of even a partially “differentiated” structure when cultured in rBM was unexpected. Further investigation showed that although these pRB-deficient cells were capable of organizing into morphologically normal acini, the nuclei of these structures appeared to be larger and slightly less organized. Additionally, HMEC+E7 acini contained many cells that had not growth arrested, unlike the normal HMEC structures. Immunofluorescence analysis of the HMEC+E7 structures revealed normal patterns of E-cadherin and collagen IV localization, indicating that the HMEC+E7 were forming normal cell-cell contacts and were properly polarized. HMEC+E7 acini expressing the luminal marker cytokeratin 18 lacked proteins typically expressed in the differentiated luminal breast epithelial cell. Neither the milk protein lactoferrin nor the luminal differentiation marker cytokeratin 19 were found in the HMEC+E7 acinar structures.

pRB has a significant role in the differentiation of many different cell types, including muscle, neuronal, and erythroid cells (19) . Typically, an early event in differentiation is the activation of pRB by dephosphorylation, allowing the cell to arrest in G0-G1. During muscle cell differentiation, hypophosphorylated pRB associates with the transcription factors MyoD and myogenin, preventing phosphorylation of pRB and the consequent reemergence into the cell cycle (20) . pRB has not been shown previously to have a role in directing the differentiation of breast epithelial cells. Because pRB is down-regulated in HMEC+E7, our data suggest that pRB is not necessary during the organization and structure formation of HMEC when cultured in a three-dimensional rBM. However, the absence of pRB does impact the expression of some proteins normally associated with the differentiated phenotype. Interestingly, a similar observation was made during MyoD-induced skeletal muscle differentiation in which cells showed attenuated expression of a late differentiation marker, myosin heavy chain (21) . The deficiency of differentiation markers in the HMEC+E7 structures could be attributable to the role of pRB in transcriptional regulation outside its classically described interaction with E2F (reviewed in Ref. 19 ). Recently, pRB was shown to interact directly with the transcription factor SP1 and increase transcription of the dihydrofolate reductase gene via the SP1 binding site (22) . Sequence analysis of human lactoferrin and mouse cytokeratin 19 has revealed SP1 sites in the promoter regions of both these genes (23 , 24) . Taken together, these data suggest a possible role for pRB in transcriptionally regulating lactoferrin and cytokeratin 19, a control that is abolished by HPV16 E7.

HPV16 E7 protein can also interact with the pRB family members p107 and p130. However, neither p107 nor p130 have been shown to be targeted for ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis by HPV16 E7, as has been established for pRB (25) . Additionally, to date no human tumors have been identified that contain mutations in p107 or p130 (reviewed in Ref. 26 ). Consequently, the roles of p107 and p130 in transformation remain unclear, and inactivation of these proteins could also be contributing to the phenotype observed in the HMEC+E7 structures. Our data demonstrate that breast epithelial cells with down-regulated pRB retain the ability to respond to structure-forming signaling cues from a rBM; however, these acinar structures are not growth arrested and do not express some of the proteins normally associated with differentiation. These data suggest that mutation of RB alone in vivo in human breast epithelial cells would not cause transformation but rather create a lesser differentiated cellular state. This modified phenotype, in conjunction with additional mutations, growth factor and hormonal modulations, and extracellular matrix perturbations, would likely result in malignancy.

Finally, it should be noted that the retinoblastoma protein has a complex set of functions within cells, and finding conditions that allow separation of these functions has been challenging. Our observations indicate that culture in a three-dimensional matrix affords a new operational definition of pRB activities that distinguishes those functions involved in polarity and initiation of differentiation from those functions that define a fully differentiated cell.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Kristi L. Neufeld for useful comments on the manuscript and Diana Lim for assistance with figure preparation.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported in part by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Grant DAMD-17-94-J-4154 and the Huntsman Cancer Institute.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Building 555, Room 567B, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112. Phone: (801) 581-6401; Fax: (801) 585-0374; E-mail: kimberly.spancake{at}hci.utah.edu

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: RB, retinoblastoma; pRB, retinoblastoma protein; HMEC, human mammary epithelial cells; HPV16, human papillomavirus type 16; rBM, reconstituted basement membrane; DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine.

  • Received August 26, 1999.
  • Accepted November 1, 1999.
  • ©1999 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Varley J. M., Armour J., Swallow J. E., Jeffreys A. J., Ponder B. A., T’Ang A., Fung Y. K., Brammar W. J., Walker R. A. The retinoblastoma gene is frequently altered, leading to loss of expression in primary breast tumours. Oncogene, 4: 725-729, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    T’Ang A., Varley J. M., Chakraborty S., Murphree A. L., Fung Y. K. Structural rearrangement of the retinoblastoma gene in human breast carcinoma. Science (Washington DC), 242: 263-266, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Gillett C., Fantl V., Smith R., Fisher C., Bartek J., Dickson C., Barnes D., Peters G. Amplification and overexpression of cyclin D1 in breast cancer detected by immunohistochemical staining. Cancer Res., 54: 1812-1817, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Geradts J., Wilson P. A. High frequency of aberrant p16(INK4A) expression in human breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 149: 15-20, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Wang N. P., To H., Lee W. H., Lee E. Y. Tumor suppressor activity of RB and p53 genes in human breast carcinoma cells. Oncogene, 8: 279-288, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Boyer S. N., Wazer D. E., Band V. E7 protein of human papilloma virus-16 induces degradation of retinoblastoma protein through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cancer Res., 56: 4620-4624, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Wazer D. E., Liu X. L., Chu Q., Gao Q., Band V. Immortalization of distinct human mammary epithelial cell types by human papilloma virus 16 E6 or E7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 3687-3691, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Li M. L., Aggeler J., Farson D. A., Hatier C., Hassell J., Bissell M. J. Influence of a reconstituted basement membrane and its components on casein gene expression and secretion in mouse mammary epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 136-140, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Bissell M. J., Weaver V. M., Lelievre S. A., Wang F., Petersen O. W., Schmeichel K. L. Tissue structure, nuclear organization, and gene expression in normal and malignant breast. Cancer Res., 59: 1757s-1764s, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Petersen O. W., Ronnov-Jessen L., Howlett A. R., Bissell M. J. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 9064-9068, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Taylor-Papadimitriou J., Stampfer M. R. Culture of human mammary epithelial cells Freshney R. I. eds. . Culture of Epithelial Cells, : 108-133, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York 1992.
  12. ↵
    Petersen O. W., van Deurs B. Preservation of defined phenotypic traits in short-term cultured human breast carcinoma derived epithelial cells. Cancer Res., 47: 856-866, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Halbert C. L., Demers G. W., Galloway D. A. The E7 gene of human papillomavirus type 16 is sufficient for immortalization of human epithelial cells. J. Virol., 65: 473-478, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Neufeld K. L., White R. L. Nuclear and cytoplasmic localizations of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 3034-3039, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Weaver V. M., Petersen O. W., Wang F., Larabell C. A., Briand P., Damsky C., Bissell M. J. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. J. Cell Biol., 137: 231-245, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Campbell T., Skilton R. A., Coombes R. C., Shousha S., Graham M. D., Luqmani Y. A. Isolation of a lactoferrin cDNA clone and its expression in human breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 65: 19-26, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Close M. J., Howlett A. R., Roskelley C. D., Desprez P. Y., Bailey N., Rowning B., Teng C. T., Stampfer M. R., Yaswen P. Lactoferrin expression in mammary epithelial cells is mediated by changes in cell shape and actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci., 110: 2861-2871, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Ronnov-Jessen L., Petersen O. W., Bissell M. J. Cellular changes involved in conversion of normal to malignant breast: importance of the stromal reaction. Physiol. Rev., 76: 69-125, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Herwig S., Strauss M. The retinoblastoma protein: a master regulator of cell cycle, differentiation and apoptosis. Eur. J. Biochem., 246: 581-601, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Gu W., Schneider J. W., Condorelli G., Kaushal S., Mahdavi V., Nadal-Ginard B. Interaction of myogenic factors and the retinoblastoma protein mediates muscle cell commitment and differentiation. Cell, 72: 309-324, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Novitch B. G., Mulligan G. J., Jacks T., Lassar A. B. Skeletal muscle cells lacking the retinoblastoma protein display defects in muscle gene expression and accumulate in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. J. Cell Biol., 135: 441-456, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Noe V., Alemany C., Chasin L. A., Ciudad C. J. Retinoblastoma protein associates with SP1 and activates the hamster dihydrofolate reductase promoter. Oncogene, 16: 1931-1938, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Teng C. T., Liu Y., Yang N., Walmer D., Panella T. Differential molecular mechanism of the estrogen action that regulates lactoferrin gene in human and mouse. Mol. Endocrinol., 6: 1969-1981, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Lussier M., Filion M., Compton J. G., Nadeau J. H., Lapointe L., Royal A. The mouse keratin 19-encoding gene: sequence, structure and chromosomal assignment. Gene (Amst.), 95: 203-213, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Berezutskaya E., Yu B., Morozov A., Raychaudhuri P., Bagchi S. Differential regulation of the pocket domains of the retinoblastoma family proteins by the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein. Cell Growth Differ., 8: 1277-1286, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    Mulligan G., Jacks T. The retinoblastoma gene family: cousins with overlapping interests. Trends Genet., 14: 223-229, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
December 1999
Volume 59, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
E7-transduced Human Breast Epithelial Cells Show Partial Differentiation in Three-dimensional Culture
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
E7-transduced Human Breast Epithelial Cells Show Partial Differentiation in Three-dimensional Culture
Kimberly M. Spancake, Christine B. Anderson, Valerie M. Weaver, Norisada Matsunami, Mina J. Bissell and Raymond L. White
Cancer Res December 15 1999 (59) (24) 6042-6045;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
E7-transduced Human Breast Epithelial Cells Show Partial Differentiation in Three-dimensional Culture
Kimberly M. Spancake, Christine B. Anderson, Valerie M. Weaver, Norisada Matsunami, Mina J. Bissell and Raymond L. White
Cancer Res December 15 1999 (59) (24) 6042-6045;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Crucial Role of Phospholipase Cε in Chemical Carcinogen-Induced Skin Tumor Development
  • Down-Regulation of Regulatory Subunit Type 1A of Protein Kinase A Leads to Endocrine and Other Tumors
  • Activating Mutations of the Noonan Syndrome-Associated SHP2/PTPN11 Gene in Human Solid Tumors and Adult Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
Show more Advances in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2018 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement