Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Focus on Computer Resources
    • 75th Anniversary
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Focus on Computer Resources
    • 75th Anniversary
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology

Dose-Dependent Effects of Focal Fractionated Irradiation on Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in Nf1 Mutant Mice

Jean L. Nakamura, Connie Phong, Emile Pinarbasi, Scott C. Kogan, Scott Vandenberg, Andrew E. Horvai, Bruce A. Faddegon, Dorothea Fiedler, Kevan Shokat, Benjamin T. Houseman, Richard Chao, Russell O. Pieper and Kevin Shannon
Jean L. Nakamura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Connie Phong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emile Pinarbasi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott C. Kogan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Vandenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew E. Horvai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce A. Faddegon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dorothea Fiedler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevan Shokat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin T. Houseman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Chao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell O. Pieper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Shannon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2732 Published January 2011
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) are increasingly common complications of cancer therapy that have proven difficult to model in mice. Clinical observations suggest that the development of SMN correlates with radiation dose; however, this relationship has not been investigated systematically. We developed a novel procedure for administering fractionated cranial irradiation (CI) and investigated the incidence and spectrum of cancer in control and heterozygous Nf1 mutant mice irradiated to a moderate (15 Gy) or high dose (30 Gy). Heterozygous Nf1 inactivation cooperated with CI to induce solid tumors and myeloid malignancies, with mice developing many of the most common SMNs found in human patients. CI-induced malignancies segregated according to radiation dose as Nf1+/− mice developed predominately hematologic abnormalities after 15 Gy, whereas solid tumors predominated at 30 Gy, suggesting that radiation dose thresholds exist for hematologic and nonhematologic cancers. Genetic and biochemical studies revealed discrete patterns of somatic Nf1 and Trp53 inactivation and we observed hyperactive Ras signaling in many radiation-induced solid tumors. This technique for administering focal fractionated irradiation will facilitate mechanistic and translational studies of SMNs. Cancer Res; 71(1); 106–15. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

Secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) are late complications arising after exposure to genotoxic therapies, which include radiotherapy and many chemotherapeutic agents. SMNs account for most of the approximately 90,000 new cancers that are diagnosed annually in the United States in persons who previously had a histologically distinct malignancy (1). Moreover, the incidence of SMNs is expected to grow as the at-risk population of cancer survivors treated with intensive therapeutic regimens increases. This prediction is consistent with data showing that the dramatic improvement in the cure rates of many pediatric cancers over the past few decades was followed by increasing numbers of SMNs (2). SMNs are often high-grade, aggressive tumors that are resistant to therapy. Because the mechanisms underlying SMN development are poorly understood and experimental models are lacking, fundamental questions about SMN pathogenesis and treatment have not been addressed.

Nearly two thirds of cancer patients receive radiotherapy. Modern treatment protocols typically involve administering a high dose of fractionated irradiation to a defined anatomic site of disease. Retrospective studies have shown that the vast majority of SMNs arise in tissues that were included in the radiation field and support a relationship between the total dose of radiation and tumorigenesis (3). Murine studies of radiation mutagenesis have generally employed single, low-dose total body irradiation (TBI), which does not accurately model the high-dose targeted radiotherapy most cancer patients receive. Furthermore, existing mouse models have not specifically addressed the relationship of treatment parameters such as focal radiation dose to the subsequent risk and spectrum of SMNs. Although unexamined, this relationship is important clinically because contemporary radiotherapy techniques are capable of delivering extremely conformal radiation dose distributions and differentially dosing multiple malignant and normal structures.

Mutations in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene cause neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a common familial cancer syndrome (4, 5). NF1 encodes neurofibromin, a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that negatively regulates Ras signaling (6, 7). Affected individuals are predisposed to specific benign and malignant tumors, which include tumors of the central and peripheral nervous systems, soft tissue sarcomas, pheochromocytoma, and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML; ref. 8). In addition, retrospective clinical data suggest that persons with NF1 who are treated with genotoxins for a primary cancer are at increased risk of developing common SMNs such as myeloid leukemia, soft tissue sarcomas, and malignant gliomas (9, 10).

We previously found that TBI, when delivered alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, induced a spectrum of SMNs in Nf1+/− mice that include myeloid malignancies, soft tissue sarcomas, and breast carcinomas. Because low-dose TBI does not accurately model current radiation oncology practice for the majority of patients, we developed a customized technique to model clinical brain radiotherapy by delivering focal, fractionated cranial irradiation (CI) to mice.

Here we show that CI cooperates with heterozygous Nf1 inactivation to induce solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Importantly, we observed a clear threshold for disease induction with almost all of myeloid malignancies occurring in mice that received 15 Gy, whereas solid tumors concentrated in the cohort that received 30 Gy. Some types of radiation-induced tumors consistently showed somatic loss of the normal Nf1 alleles whereas others did not, which suggests that Ras-dependent and -independent mechanisms contribute to radiation-induced tumorigenesis. Consistent with this idea, we obtained evidence for hyperactive Ras signaling in primary radiation-induced tumors from both wild-type (WT) and Nf1 mutant mice. Together, these studies establish a new approach for modeling clinical radiation therapy regimens in mice, reveal cooperation between Nf1 inactivation and focal CI in generating SMNs, and identify hyperactive Ras as a potential biochemical target in common SMNs.

Materials and Methods

Mouse strains, breeding, and treatment

Nf1+/− mice were generated as previously described (11). In brief, Nf1+/− mice maintained in the 129/Sv background (12) were crossed with WT C57Bl/6 mice. We modified a previously published rat brain irradiation protocol developed at our institution to reproducibly irradiate murine brains in vivo (13). Mice were placed 16.3cm from a cesium-137 source (J.L. Shepherd & Associates) and shielded with an iron collimator that limited the beam width to a narrow 1 centimeter wide vertical beam. Mice (6- to 8-weeks old) were given CI at a fractionation of either 5 fractions of 3 Gy or 10 fractions of 3 Gy, delivered at a rate of 5 fractions per week, 1 fraction per day. All animal procedures were approved by the UCSF IACUC.

Pathologic analysis

Animals with signs of systemic illness were euthanized and visible masses/growths, peripheral blood, and bone marrow were collected immediately. The mice were then perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde and the following organs were collected: brain, skin in irradiated region, skin outside irradiated region, skull, heart, lungs, spleen, liver, kidneys, and segment of small intestine. Pathologic review was done on hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections by A.H., S.K., or S.V. Complete blood counts (CBC) were done on blood samples obtained at the time of sacrifice by cardiac puncture and analyzed immediately on a Hemavet provided by the UCSF Mouse Pathology Core.

Immunohistochemistry

Five-micrometer sections were obtained through paraffin-embedded tumors. Phosphorylated ERK Thr202/Tyr204 (catalog #4376), phosphorylated Akt Ser473 (#9271) and phosphorylated S6 Ser235/236 (#2211; all from Cell Signaling) were assessed on paraffin-embedded sections using immunofluorescent staining as described previously (14). Slides were visualized on a fluorescent microscope and 6 independent fields were scored for relative fluorescence at ×40 magnification by a blinded reviewer (J.N.). These scores were then averaged to generate the fluorescence score. Images were captured and merged using Openlab (Improvision).

Genotyping and mutation analysis

Trp53 loss of heterozygosity was analyzed at the D11Mit29 and D11Mit31 loci by amplifying tumor DNA with the following primers: forward 5′-TTGAGGCATGAGGGGATTAG-3′, reverse 5′–TTTCCGTCATTGCTAAAGGG-3′, 5′–TTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGGCCTGAATTCACATGGTGG-3′, reverse 5′-AGAATAAGTAAACCCAGCTGCG-3′. D11Mit219 was amplified with the following primers: forward 5′-TTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTTGTATGTATAGATGCATTTGAATGG 3′, reverse 5′-GGTTTGTATAAATTCTCACCTGTGC-3′. PCR fragment analyses were done by the UCSF Genome Core using Peak Scanner software from Applied Biosystems. SNP rs13481119 was amplified using the following primers: forward GC CCGCTACATG CTGATGCTG reverse GCTTGTAGGCCTGGTGAGTC. SNP products were sequenced using a commercial sequencing service.

Cell culture

Nf1−/−, Nf1+/−, and WT mouse embryo fibroblasts were generated as previously described (15). Tumor cell lines were generated as previously described (11). All cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (4,500 mg/L glucose; Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO-BRL, Invitrogen), penicillin, and streptomycin. Cells were grown in a humidified incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide at 37°C.

Quantitation of γH2AX foci formation

Cells grown on glass coverslips were irradiated, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at specified time points. Coverslips were permeabilized and probed with anti-γH2AX Ser139 antibody (Millipore), followed by anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 488 secondary antibody (Molecular Probes). Coverslips were mounted using Vectashield with 4′,6 diamidino 2 phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories), and visualized with a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope.

Statistical analysis

Survival curves are calculated from Kaplan–Meier product limit estimators to determine the association of CI on mortality. Interim sacrifices of moribund animals are taken as uncensored events whereas the terminal, end-of-study sacrifices are necessarily considered censored. Log-rank tests are used to test for differences in survival curves between groups. Fisher–Irwin exact tests are used to make pairwise comparisons of total disease incidence between dosage groups. Cochran–Armitage tests for trend are used to consider all dosage groups together. Disease-specific incidence is compared using both unadjusted and survival-adjusted analyses. Two-way ANOVAs were used to assess the effects of genotype and radiation dosage on hemoglobin levels, white blood cell count, and platelet count. Two-tailed t tests were used to make pairwise comparisons of hemoglobin levels, white blood cell counts, and platelet counts. All analyses were done on R 2.7.0.

Results

Survival and tumorigenesis after CI

CI is one of the most common types of radiation therapy, and a significant fraction of SMNs observed today result from prior brain irradiation. To replicate this treatment experimentally, we developed customized beam shaping to deliver focal, fractionated, CI to mice (Supplementary Fig.S1A). Similar to the whole brain irradiation technique used in patients, equally weighted, opposed lateral beams were used to deliver multifraction CI to mice. Radiographic film was used to quantitate radiation dosimetry, describing the absolute radiation dose rate both within and outside the irradiation field, and the dose homogeneity across the beam aperture (Supplementary Fig.S1B).

The study cohort included 121 mice that were generated by mating Nf1+/− mice on a 129/Sv strain background and WT C57Bl/6 mice. These F1 Nf1+/− (n = 73) and WT (n = 48) mice were assigned to 1 of the following 3 CI treatment regimens: 0 Gy, 15 Gy (5 doses of 3 Gy), or 30 Gy (10 doses of 3 Gy). Fraction sizes were maintained at 3 Gy to determine the effect of total radiation dose on disease development. These radiation doses were selected to approximate clinically used radiation fractionation schemes, and mice were irradiated 5 times per week, 1 fraction per day, identical to clinical practice. Mice were observed for 18months after radiation treatment or until they developed signs of systemic illness that necessitated euthanasia.

As expected from previous reports (11, 12, 16), the survival of unirradiated Nf1+/− mice was reduced compared to WT littermates (P = 0.02, log-rank test) with deaths occurring after 1 year of age (Fig.1A). CI significantly decreased the survival of both WT (P = 0.002, log-rank test) and Nf1+/− (P = 0.05, log-rank test) mice (Fig.1A). Furthermore, there were increased risks of death in Nf1+/− versus WT mice with a hazard ratio of death of 2.041 (95% CI: 1.116–3.735) and in irradiated mice over unirradiated mice with a hazard ratio of death of 3.788 (95% CI: 1.618–8.870). The median posttreatment survival time was reduced in irradiated Nf1+/− mice compared with irradiated WT mice (503 versus 596 days; P = 0.04, log-rank test), showing that the worst overall outcome was observed in irradiated Nf1+/− mice. Interestingly, the survival of both WT and Nf1+/− mice was reduced to a similar extent by either moderate-dose (3 Gy × 5) or high-dose (3 Gy × 10) CI (Fig.1B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overall survival and disease-specific survival after CI. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to depict overall survival, solid tumor-free survival, and hematologic disease-free survival in WT and Nf1 mutant mice. Log-rank tests were used to test for differences between survival curves. The latency to death was measured from the date of the last radiation fraction. A and B, WT and Nf1 mutant mice had decreased survival after CI. C and D, Kaplan–Meier cause-specific survival curves were generated to reflect death due to hematologic malignancies or solid tumors. Nf1+/− mice exposed to 15 Gy CI were significantly more likely to die with hematologic disease than those that were unirradiated or exposed to 30 Gy CI (HR 4.151, 95% CI: 0.9081–18.971, P = 0.0465). D, Nf1+/− mice exposed to 30 Gy CI were significantly more likely to die of solid tumors than mice that were unirradiated or exposed to 15 Gy CI (HR 1.659, 95% confidence interval: 0.3037 = 9.058, P = 0.04).

Nf1+/− mice develop radiation-induced cancers in a dose-related manner

Pathologic analyses were done on 120 of 121 mice in the study cohort, including 116 that had histopathologic evaluation of cranial and hematologic organs. A few early deaths in WT and Nf1 mutant mice were consistent with radiation-induced cerebral edema, a known side effect of CI. Necropsies of both moribund and terminally sacrificed mice revealed the predominance of 2 distinct disease phenotypes: solid tumor in the irradiated region (in-field tumors) and myeloid malignancies. The latency before the onset of clinical signs that necessitated euthanasia was similar in mice that died with solid tumors and myeloid malignancies. Early stage solid tumors and myeloid malignancies were evident at necropsy in some asymptomatic mice, and were more common in irradiated Nf1 mutant than in irradiated WT controls (P = 0.003, log-rank test). Overall, irradiated Nf1 mutant mice were more likely than irradiated WT mice to develop hematologic malignancies (P = 0.003, log-rank test) or solid cancers (P = 0.05). Analysis of overall tumor incidence confirmed a positive, linear association with radiation dose (P = 0.0395, survival adjusted Cochran–Armitage trend test) and the tumorigenicity of the 30-Gy dose over 15-Gy dose (P = 0.04, Fisher exact test). We performed log-rank tests to compare disease-specific survival and observed the highest incidence of myeloid malignancies in Nf1 mutant mice that received 15 Gy of CI (Fig.1C; 0 Gy versus 15 Gy: P = 0.031, 15 Gy versus 30 Gy: P = 0.017, Fisher exact tests). By contrast, disease-specific survival due to solid tumor was significantly reduced in Nf1 mutant mice receiving 30 Gy of CI (P = 0.019, log-rank test; Fig.1D). Thus, whereas exposure to 15 Gy of focal radiation was more leukemogenic than 30 Gy, the incidence of solid cancers was greater at the higher radiation dose. CI did not reach significance with regard to altered disease-specific survivals due to solid tumor or hematologic malignancy in WT mice.

Radiation-induced solid tumors after CI

Mice receiving CI developed several types of solid tumors arising from the central nervous system, bone, skin and orbits within the irradiated region. These in-field solid tumors included squamous cell carcinomas, osteosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, papillary carcinoma, pituitary adenomas, choroid plexus papilloma, and lymphomas, which arose within the irradiated field and were classified as solid cancers in our analyses (Fig.2; Supplementary Table S1). The latencies associated with these tumors were roughly similar, with the majority developing at least 1 year after CI.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Solid cancers arising after high-dose focal CI. Five micrometer paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and histologically classified. A, papillary carcinoma; B, squamous cell carcinoma; C, pituitary adenoma; D, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Bars = 50mm.

Myeloid malignancies after CI

Nf1+/− mice developed a spectrum of myeloid disorders, which occurred in animals that succumbed prematurely and incidentally in animals that were analyzed at the end of the experiment. Early death was most common in Nf1+/− mice that received 15 Gy of CI (Fig.1C). Pathologic analysis of most of these mice revealed a disorder that was reminiscent of human myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), which is characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and anemia. We obtained CBC from 96 of 121 (80%) mice in the study cohort at death from disease or elective euthanasia and found that anemia was largely restricted to Nf1+/− mice that received 15 Gy of CI (Fig.3A). There were no significant differences in blood leukocyte or platelet counts segregating with either genotype or radiation dosage. Because anemia occurs in some human patients with advanced solid cancers, we compared the CBCs of mice that developed solid tumors to those of mice without solid tumors. All parameters, including hemoglobin levels, were comparable between mice that were euthanized due to a solid tumor and mice without overt disease (Fig.3B). In comparison with normal mice (Fig.3C, top row), most Nf1+/− mice that received 15 Gy of CI showed marked expansion of the red pulp in the spleen (Fig.3C, left and middle, middle row), which was characterized by a predominance of erythroid cells, and bone marrows that contained a mix of myeloid and erythroid elements (Fig.3C, right, middle row). The presence of marked splenic erythroid hyperplasia along with persistent erythropoiesis in the bone marrow and peripheral anemia strongly suggests ineffective hematopoiesis: a finding that parallels the abnormal erythroid development seen in human refractory anemia and related MDS. In humans, MDS following irradiation may also be hypoplastic, in contrast to the hypercellular marrows more typical of MDS. Interestingly, some mice in the Nf1+/− 15-Gy cohort with marked peripheral anemia showed minimal splenic red pulp expansion (Fig.3C, left, last row) with erythroid precursors present, but not expanded in the spleen (Fig.3C, middle, last row) and bone marrow (Fig.3C, right, last row). Although the cause of the hypoproductive anemias observed in these mice is not certain, we speculate that these animals developed an illness paralleling human hypoplastic MDS.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Hematologic malignancies observed after high-dose focal CI. Five micrometer paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of spleen and sternum were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. A, box plots of hemoglobin levels at the time of sacrifice for each treatment group. Nf1 mutant mice exposed to 15 Gy CI are significantly more anemic compared with Nf1 mutant mice that are unirradiated or exposed to 30 Gy CI, and compared to all WT mice (P < 0.05, 2-tailed test). Thick black line indicates median, upper edge of box indicates third quartile, lower edge of box indicates first quartile. B, box plots of hemoglobin levels were compared on the basis of cause of death. Mice sacrificed due to hematologic disease were anemic compared to those who did not have histologic evidence of hematologic disease (P < 0.001, 2-tailed test), although no significant difference in hemoglobin levels was observed between mice that did and did not die of solid tumor. C, top row, left to right, normal spleen (20× and 100×), and bone marrow (100×) from an unirradiated Nf1 mutant mouse. Middle row, left to right: spleen (20× and 100×) and bone marrow (100×) from an irradiated Nf1 mutant mouse with peripheral anemia. Bottom row, left to right, spleen (20× and 100×) and bone marrow (100×) from an irradiated Nf1 mutant mouse that developed anemia but whose spleen and marrow lacked erythropoietic expansion.

Pathologic analysis of Nf1+/− mice also identified some with hematologic abnormalities that were distinct from the MDS-like phenotypes seen in the 15-Gy cohort. Nf1+/− mice are predisposed to spontaneously develop a myeloproliferative neoplasm in the second year of life that models human JMML and is characterized by leukocytosis and splenomegaly without anemia (12, 16). Consistent with this, spleen weight averaged 0.588 grams in Nf1+/− mice and 0.200 grams in WT mice, and was independent of radiationdose. We also observed 4 cases of histiocytic sarcoma in Nf1+/− mice, 2 of which were detected incidentally after elective euthanasia.

Genetic alterations in radiation-induced tumors

The F1 background of our study cohort allowed us to use strain-specific polymorphisms to screen tumors for loss of constitutional heterozygosity (LOH). Because the Nf1 mutant allele was maintained on the 129/Sv background, loss of the Nf1 allele derived from the C57Bl/6 parent results in homozygous inactivation. Trp53, the murine homologue of the tumor suppressor Tp53 in humans, is separated from the Nf1 gene by 9.7 Mb on mouse chromosome 11, and concurrent loss of Nf1 and Trp53 genes accelerates tumorigenesis in mice (17, 18). We used a PCR-based technique that employs fluorescently-labeled probes amplifying DNA fragments corresponding to microsatellite sequence polymorphisms to analyze 6 primary solid tumors from Nf1+/− mice for LOH at Nf1 and Trp53. The loci examined included 3 microsatellite markers: D11Mit29, which is closely linked to Trp53; D11Mit31 and D11Mit219, which are located between Trp53 and Nf1; and rs13481119, an intragenic Nf1 single nucleotide polymorphism (Fig.4A). These studies revealed marked reduction in the C57Bl/6-derived allele at all 4 loci in a CI-induced sarcoma (Fig.4B–D). By contrast, 2 of 4 squamous cell carcinomas showed LOH at Nf1, but all of these tumors retained both Trp53 alleles (Fig.4C–D). A pituitary adenoma was the only tumor displaying loss of the 129/Sv-derived Nf1 allele at all 4 loci examined, which infers that Nf1 loss does not drive tumorigenesis in this context. In contrast to the solid tumors, Nf1 inactivation was uncommon in radiation-induced myeloid malignancies with only 2 of 12 splenic DNA samples showing LOH at Nf1.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Molecular analysis at the Trp53 and Nf1 loci. A, schematic of mouse chromosome 11 depicting the positions of the microsatellite markers and SNP assessed relative to Trp53 and Nf1. Microsatellite markers D11Mit29, D11Mit31, and D11Mit219 were used to assess Trp53 and the intervening region between Trp53 and Nf1 in radiation-induced tumors and normal tail controls. B, fragment analysis of the D11Mit29 locus reveals that normal tissue from C57Bl/6 (B6) and 129/Sv (129) mice show discrete peaks at 141 and 147/149, respectively, and these allelic contributions are readily visualized in F1 mice. In radiation-induced osteosarcoma tumor (OS, an osteosarcoma arising in a Nf1 mutant mouse receiving 30 Gy CI) DNA the B6 fragment is significantly reduced (*) compared to control tail DNA. C, SNP rs13481119 was sequenced, showing heterozygosity in F1 mice. Comparison of tumor DNA to matched tail shows intact heterozygosity in SCCA (a squamous cell carcinoma), reduction of B6 peak in OS, and reduction of 129 peak in a pituitary adenoma. D, the pattern of LOH is described for each microsatellite and SNP locus by tumor type arising in Nf1 mutant mice. The number of tumors losing the C57Bl/6 allele (table on left) or 129/Sv allele (table on right) is listed over the total number of tumors assessed at the locus.

We also used this sensitive platform to analyze 12 malignant solid tumors that developed in Nf1+/− mice after TBI that have been reported by Chao etal. (11). These studies confirmed a high frequency of LOH at the Nf1 locus in sarcomas (6 of 8) and mammary tumors (4 of 4), and LOH at Trp53 in all of the mammary tumors (Supplementary Table S2). Sufficient DNA was available from 5 TBI-induced sarcomas for genotyping at all 4 loci, and revealed LOH extending to Trp53 in 2 of these tumors that was not detected previously (11).

Ras signaling is activated in radiation-induced tumors

Nf1 loss results in hyperactive Ras signaling and activation of canonical downstream kinase effector cascades in many cell types. To investigate Ras pathways implicated in cancer, we performed immunohistochemical analysis of primary radiation-induced tumors with antibodies that recognize phosphorylated forms of ERK, Akt and S6 (pERK, pAkt, and pS6) and devised a semiquantititative scoring system to compare staining intensity with a score of “1” corresponding to no detectable phospho-protein and a score of “3” reflecting diffuse and uniform staining. We observed elevated pAkt and pS6 levels in most tumors compared with normal tissues with considerable variability between individual tumors (Fig.5). Whereas some tumors displayed good concordance between pAkt and pS6 levels, several tumors showed proportionately more pS6 staining (Fig.5A), and pS6 was most consistently elevated in vivo relative to normal tissues in radiation-induced tumors (Fig. 5B). By contrast, we detected elevated levels of pERK less frequently in primary tumors compared to pAkt and pS6 (Supplementary Fig.S2). The ranges of pAkt and pS6 levels were similar in radiation-induced tumors from WT and Nf1+/− mice, and loss of the normal Nf1 allele did not have consistent effects on pERK, pAkt, or pS6 levels (Fig.5A; Supplementary Fig.S2).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

In vivo analysis of Ras effector phosphorylation in tumor tissues. Five micrometer tumor sections were stained with DAPI and phospho-specific antibodies were used to visualize in vivo levels of pS6 and pAkt. A, tumor sections were visualized with fluorescence microscopy and six 40× fields from each section were scored in blinded fashion as either 1 (no signal), 2 (low signal) or 3 (high signal), then averaged. Average scores for pS6 and pAkt are plotted. Tumors in which LOH at SNP rs13481119 (intragenic to Nf1) were assessed are indicated as follows: tumors showing intact heterozygosity at SNP rs13481119 are plotted as light blue circles, with LOH of B6 allele as dark blue squares, or with LOH of 129 allele as magenta squares. B, phosphorylated S6 (pS6) levels are elevated in tumor sections from a radiation-induced pituitary adenoma and osteosarcoma, whereas pAkt levels are not correspondingly elevated. Bar = 50 μm.

Radiation response in WT and Nf1 mutant cells

The mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of individuals with NF1 and Nf1 mutant mice to radiation-induced tumors are unknown. Defects in DNA repair underlie some disorders that result in cancer susceptibility after radiation exposure, such as ataxia-telangiectasia (19). Although neurofibromin possesses a nuclear localization signal, it has no known role in maintaining genomic integrity (20). To determine whether heterozygous or homozygous Nf1 inactivation might subtly alter this response, we compared γH2AX formation in WT, Nf1+/− and homozygous Nf1 mutant (Nf1−/−) MEFs that were exposed to low-dose irradiation (Supplementary Fig.S3). H2AX is a histone protein phosphorylated by ATM in response to the presence of double strand DNA breaks, resulting in the formation of nuclear γH2AX foci (19). Resolution of these foci over time reflects DNA repair capacity. We observed similar patterns of γH2AX foci formation and resolution over time in WT and Nf1 mutant mouse embryo fibroblasts, which suggests that Nf1 inactivation does not have global effects on DNA repair.

Discussion

The risk of late toxicities after cancer therapy concerns virtually every cancer survivor, and SMNs are the most severe and life-threatening of these complications. Indeed, the ongoing experience of childhood cancer survivors who were cured with intensive genotoxic regimens suggests that the development of SMNs might ultimately compromise recent improvements in cancer survival (1, 21, 22). Although common, SMNs have proven difficult to study clinically and experimentally. Patients with NF1 are predisposed to many of the same SMNs as the general population (10) and Nf1+/− mice are a genetically sensitized background for investigating tumorigenesis secondary to radiation and/or chemotherapeutic agents (11, 16). However, “first generation” models do not recapitulate current clinical practice in which high-dose fractionated radiotherapy is administered to a defined anatomic site of disease. We have overcome this limitation by developing a technique for delivering localized multidose CI to mice. Furthermore, individuals with NF1 are predisposed to specific CNS tumors and the risk of subsequent SMN induction influences their care (10). We found that solid tumor development was dose-related and occurred within the radiation field, mirroring clinical observations in childhood cancer survivors (23). The long latencies and diverse histologies of these squamous cell carcinomas, osteosarcomas, and soft tissue sarcomas also reflect the natural history of SMNs. Importantly, Nf1+/− and Nf1−/− MEFs activate the p53 pathway in response to doxorubicin (11) and we observed normal γH2AX foci formation and resolution after irradiation. Together, these clinical, pathologic, and biologic characteristics suggest that administering high-dose focal irradiation to Nf1 mutant mice is a robust system for accurately modeling common SMNs in the general population that has some advantages over using Atm or Trp53 mutant mice, which show abnormal responses to DNA damage.

We did not observe radiation-induced gliomas or meningiomas in Nf1+/− mice that were exposed to CI. This was unexpected as both are well-recognized SMNs after CI (10, 24, 25) and mice that inherit mutations in Nf1 and Trp53 in cis are predisposed to malignant gliomas (17, 26, 27). Our data therefore suggest that loss of Trp53 may be an early and rate-limiting event in gliomagenesis. Alternatively, the latency to glioma development may exceed that of other solid tumor types, and euthanizing mice due to non-gliomatous disease precluded the detection of radiation-induced gliomas.

Nf1+/− mice that were treated with focal CI died with a hematologic disorder that was highly reminiscent of human MDS, and it is provocative that these malignancies arose predominantly at the lower radiation dose level. Our data showing an upper radiation dose threshold defining risk are consistent with clinical observations that hematologic cancers are extremely rare with high-dose focal irradiation, but can be induced by low-dose focal irradiation in individuals receiving radiotherapy for benign illnesses (28). The mechanisms by which low to moderate-dose irradiation induces hematologic malignancies are unknown. Importantly, however, injury to the entire hematopoietic stem cellcompartment cannot account for the occurrence of MDS and other hematologic disorders in our model as the focal CI protocol spared most of the blood-forming marrow. However, in contrast to humans, the murine cranium possesses blood-forming capacity. Instead, our data argue strongly in favor of a mechanism in which radiation induces genetic damage in a susceptible cell, which subsequently achieves clonal dominance. We speculate that exposure to high-dose radiation ablates most potential leukemia-initiating cells whereas lower doses induce sublethal genetic damage that promotes clonal outgrowth and ultimately results in frank hematologic malignancy.

In addition to total radiation dose, fraction size could influence the dose dependence of radiation-induced tumorigenesis in our model. In certain clinical situations, increasing fractionation of radiotherapy, which increases the number of radiation exposures but decreases the dose per exposure, is favored over single exposure radiotherapy to favor normal tissue repair that can occur between fractions. One might then expect that increasing fractionation would be associated with fewer SMNs. Alternatively, it is possible that multifraction radiotherapy, possibly in settings in which DNA repair in normal tissues is compromised, may increase the risk of SMN development due to the successive accumulation of mutations over the course of radiotherapy. We did not address the issue of fraction size in this study and these mechanisms are worth further study.

Molecular analysis at the Nf1 and Trp53 loci revealed 3 general patterns of genetic alterations in tumors from mice that received either high-dose focal CI or low-dose TBI: LOH involving Nf1 only; LOH at Nf1, Trp53, and 2 intervening loci; and intact heterozygosity. Consistent with the increased risk of cancer in irradiated Nf1+/− mice, Nf1 is affected by LOH more commonly than Trp53. Nf1 inactivation is highly prevalent in mammary tumors and sarcomas from mice that received low-dose TBI (11), and was also observed in a sarcoma that arose after high-dose focal CI. By contrast, LOH at Nf1 was less common in mice that developed squamous cell carcinoma after high-dose focal CI, and was surprisingly infrequent in myeloid malignancies that emerged in Nf1+/− mice treated with either radiation regimen (11). It is possible that radiation-induced Nf1 inactivation in leukemia-initiating cells is due to mechanisms that do not result in LOH such as small intragenic deletions or point mutations in the normal Nf1 allele. Alternatively, haploinsufficiency for Nf1 might cooperate with radiation-induced mutations of other genes in myeloid leukemogenesis. Interestingly, the low incidence of LOH at Nf1 in mice with radiation-induced myeloid malignancies is consistent with data from human NF1 patients who developed secondary leukemia (9).

Immunohistochemical analysis revealed elevated levels of pAkt and pS6 in many radiation-induced tumors, which did not correlate with either the Nf1 mutant genotype or with somatic loss of the normal Nf1 allele. The variable levels of pAkt, pS6, and pERK that we observed in tumor from Nf1+/− mice infer that Ras signaling is modulated during the complex process of multistep tumorigenesis. This idea is consistent with the extensive biochemical heterogeneity reported in a panel of T-cell leukemias that were generated by insertional mutagenesis in WT and Kras mutant mice (29). The observed biochemical variability may also be explained by the fact that Nf1 inactivation, which reduces cellular GAP activity, has less severe biochemical consequences than an oncogenic Ras mutation, which perturbs both the intrinsic Ras GTPase and confers resistance to GAPs. Signaling in an Nf1 mutant cell might therefore be more dependent on tissue type and on input from other constituents of the microenvironment.

Although our data have obvious relevance for understanding SMNs that arise in patients with NF1, they also identify NF1 as a candidate gene in breast cancers, sarcomas, MDS, and other SMNs in the general population. This idea is consistent with emerging data implicating NF1 in the pathogenesis of sporadic tumors as exemplified by the high incidence of NF1 mutations in de novo glioblastoma multiforme reported by the Cancer Genome Atlas project (30). Beyond NF1, our data also raise the possibility that other mutations that deregulate Ras signaling may contribute to the development of common SMNs and play a pivotal role in their malignant growth. Along these lines, it is provocative that immunohistochemical analysis revealed elevated levels of pAkt and pS6 in both Nf1 mutant and control solid tumors in vivo. Cancer survivors who develop an SMN often face limited treatment options and are excluded from participation in clinical trials of novel agents. Our data also suggest that pharmacologic inhibition of Ras effectors may prove efficacious in managing some SMNs. Finally, the technique that we have developed for delivering CI to mice can be extended to other anatomic sites/tissues and we recently developed a procedure to administer focal mammary gland irradiation to mice in an effort to model the high incidence of secondary breast cancer in women who are irradiated for Hodgkin's disease (31, 32). The general strategy of accurately modeling high-dose focal human radiation therapy treatment protocols in mice provides a robust new experimental approach for addressing biologic and translational questions in common SMNs.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This study was supported by NIH grants K08CA115476 (to J.L. Nakamura), P01CA40046 and R37CA72614 (to K. Shannon); and by a SCOR award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America (to S.C. Kogan and K. Shannon). S.C. Kogan is a Scholar of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Vivian Weinberg for advice on statistical analyses, Jonathan Woo for thoughtful discussions of analytical approaches, and the UCSF Genome Core for their advice and assistance with microsatellite analysis. We also thank Tyler Jacks for providing Nf1 mutant mice.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received July 26, 2010.
  • Revision received October 13, 2010.
  • Accepted October 17, 2010.
  • ©2011 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bhatia S,
    2. Sklar C
    . Second cancers in survivors of childhood cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:124–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Meadows AT,
    2. Silber J
    . Delayed consequences of therapy for childhood cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1985;35:271–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Constine LS,
    2. Tarbell N,
    3. Hudson MM,
    4. Schwartz C,
    5. Fisher SG,
    6. Muhs AG,
    7. et al.
    Subsequent malignancies in children treated for Hodgkin's disease: associations with gender and radiation dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:24–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cichowski K,
    2. Jacks T
    . NF1 tumor suppressor gene function: narrowing the GAP. Cell 2001;104:593–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dasgupta B,
    2. Gutmann DH
    . Neurofibromatosis 1: closing the GAP between mice and men. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003;13:20–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Boguski M,
    2. McCormick F
    . Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives. Nature 1993;366:643–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Donovan S,
    2. Shannon KM,
    3. Bollag G
    . GTPase activating proteins: critical regulators of intracellular signaling. BBA Rev Cancer 2002;1602:23–45.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Upashyaya M,
    2. Cooper DN
    1. Side LE,
    2. Shannon KM
    . The NF1 gene as a tumor suppressor. In: Upashyaya M, Cooper DN, editors. Neurofibromatosis type 1, Human Molecular Genetics series. Oxford, UK: Bios Scientific Publishers;(1998), p. 133–52.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Maris JM,
    2. Wiersma SR,
    3. Mahgoub N,
    4. Thompson P,
    5. Geyer RJ,
    6. Hurwitz CG,
    7. et al.
    Monosomy 7 myelodysplastic syndrome and other second malignant neoplasms in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Cancer 1997;79:1438–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sharif S,
    2. Ferner R,
    3. Birch JM,
    4. Gillespie JE,
    5. Gattamaneni HR,
    6. Baser ME,
    7. et al.
    Second primary tumors in neurofibromatosis 1 patients treated for optic glioma: substantial risks after radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2570–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chao RC,
    2. Pyzel U,
    3. Fridlyand J,
    4. Kuo YM,
    5. Teel L,
    6. Haaga J,
    7. et al.
    Therapy-induced malignant neoplasms in Nf1 mutant mice. Cancer Cell 2005;8:337–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Jacks T,
    2. Shih TS,
    3. Schmitt EM,
    4. Bronson RT,
    5. Bernards A,
    6. Weinberg RA
    . Tumour predisposition in mice heterozygous for a targeted mutation in Nf1. Nat Genet 1994;7:353–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ozawa T,
    2. Faddegon BA,
    3. Hu LJ,
    4. Bollen AW,
    5. Lamborn KR,
    6. Deen DF
    . Response of intracerebral human glioblastoma xenografts to multifraction radiation exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:263–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Affara NI,
    2. Trempus CS,
    3. Schanbacher BL,
    4. Pei P,
    5. Mallery SR,
    6. Bauer JA,
    7. et al.
    Activation of Akt and mTOR in CD34+/K15+ keratinocyte stem cells and skin tumors during multi-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res 2006;26:2805–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Le DT,
    2. Kong N,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Lauchle JO,
    5. Aiyigari A,
    6. Braun BS,
    7. et al.
    Somatic inactivation of Nf1 in hematopoietic cells results in a progressive myeloproliferative disorder. Blood 2004;103:4243–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mahgoub N,
    2. Taylor BR,
    3. Le Beau MM,
    4. Gratiot M,
    5. Carlson KM,
    6. Atwater SK,
    7. et al.
    Myeloid malignancies induced by alkylating agents in Nf1 mice. Blood 1999;93:3617–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Reilly KM,
    2. Loisel DA,
    3. Bronson RT,
    4. McLaughlin ME,
    5. Jacks T
    . Nf1;Trp53 mutant mice develop glioblastoma with evidence of strain-specific effects. Nat Genet 2000;26:109–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Guignard F,
    3. Zhao D,
    4. Liu L,
    5. Burns DK,
    6. Mason RP,
    7. et al.
    Early inactivation of p53 tumor suppressor gene cooperating with NF1 loss induces malignant astrocytoma. Cancer Cell 2005;8:119–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Bonner WM,
    2. Redon CE,
    3. Dickey JS,
    4. Nakamura AJ,
    5. Sedelnikova OA,
    6. Solier S,
    7. et al.
    GammaH2AX and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:957–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Vandenbroucke I,
    2. Van Oostveldt P,
    3. Coene E,
    4. De Paepe A,
    5. Messiaen L
    . Neurofibromin is actively transported to the nucleus. FEBS Lett 2004;560:98–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Basu SK,
    2. Schwartz C,
    3. Fisher SG,
    4. Hudson MM,
    5. Tarbell N,
    6. Muhs A,
    7. et al.
    Unilateral and bilateral breast cancer in women surviving pediatric Hodgkin's disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:34–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Travis LB,
    2. Hill D,
    3. Dores GM,
    4. Gospodarowicz M,
    5. van Leeuwen FE,
    6. Holowaty E,
    7. et al.
    Cumulative absolute breast cancer risk for young women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1428–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wong FL,
    2. Boice JD Jr.,
    3. Abramson DH,
    4. Tarone RE,
    5. Kleinerman RA,
    6. et al.
    Cancer incidence after retinoblastoma. Radiation dose and sarcoma risk. JAMA 1997;278:1262–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Modan B,
    2. Baidatz D,
    3. Mart H,
    4. Steinitz R,
    5. Levin SG
    . Radiation-induced head and neck tumours. Lancet 1974;1:277–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Neglia JP,
    2. Meadows AT,
    3. Robison LL,
    4. Kim TH,
    5. Newton WA,
    6. Ruymann FB,
    7. et al.
    Second neoplasms after acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1330–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Harada T,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Lush ME,
    5. Guignard F,
    6. Harada C,
    7. et al.
    Inactivation of NF1 in CNS causes increased glial progenitor proliferation and optic glioma formation. Development 2005;132:5577–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Alcantara Llaguno S,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Kwon CH,
    4. Jackson EL,
    5. Li Y,
    6. Burns DK,
    7. et al.
    Malignant astrocytomas originate from neural stem/progenitor cells in a somatic tumor suppressor mouse model. Cancer Cell 2009;15:45–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Darby SC,
    2. Doll R,
    3. Gill SK,
    4. Smith PG
    . Long term mortality after a single treatment course with X-rays in patients treated for ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Cancer 1987;55:179–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Dail M,
    2. Li Q,
    3. McDaniel A,
    4. Wong J,
    5. Akagi K,
    6. Huang B,
    7. et al.,
    8. Mutant Ikzf1,
    9. et al.
    KrasG12D, and Notch1 cooperate in T lineage leukemogenesis and modulate responses to targeted agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:5106–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008;455:1061–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Crump M,
    2. Hodgson D
    . Secondary breast cancer in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4229–31.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. De Bruin ML,
    2. Sparidans J,
    3. van't Veer MB,
    4. Noordijk EM,
    5. Louwman MW,
    6. Zijlstra JM,
    7. et al.
    Breast cancer risk in female survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma: lower risk after smaller radiation volumes. JClin Oncol 2009;27:4239–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 71 (1)
January 2011
Volume 71, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dose-Dependent Effects of Focal Fractionated Irradiation on Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in Nf1 Mutant Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
Dose-Dependent Effects of Focal Fractionated Irradiation on Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in Nf1 Mutant Mice
Jean L. Nakamura, Connie Phong, Emile Pinarbasi, Scott C. Kogan, Scott Vandenberg, Andrew E. Horvai, Bruce A. Faddegon, Dorothea Fiedler, Kevan Shokat, Benjamin T. Houseman, Richard Chao, Russell O. Pieper and Kevin Shannon
Cancer Res January 1 2011 (71) (1) 106-115; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2732

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dose-Dependent Effects of Focal Fractionated Irradiation on Secondary Malignant Neoplasms in Nf1 Mutant Mice
Jean L. Nakamura, Connie Phong, Emile Pinarbasi, Scott C. Kogan, Scott Vandenberg, Andrew E. Horvai, Bruce A. Faddegon, Dorothea Fiedler, Kevan Shokat, Benjamin T. Houseman, Richard Chao, Russell O. Pieper and Kevin Shannon
Cancer Res January 1 2011 (71) (1) 106-115; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2732
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • TRβ2 Bypasses Rb-Dependent Proliferation in RB1−/− Cells
  • DHHC3 Regulates Breast Tumor Growth In Vivo
  • Role of Fibroblasts in Pathogenesis of Fibroids
Show more Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2018 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement