Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Focus on Computer Resources
    • 75th Anniversary
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Focus on Computer Resources
    • 75th Anniversary
    • Meeting Abstracts
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Tumor Biology

Abstract 4269: Opposite effect of ECM features in breast carcinoma progression according to tumor cell differentiation

Tiziana Triulzi, Marco Sandri, Patrizia Casalini, Piera Aiello, Andrea Balsari, Rosaria Orlandi and Elda Tagliabue
Tiziana Triulzi
1Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Sandri
1Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrizia Casalini
1Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piera Aiello
1Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Balsari
2University of Milan, Institute of Human Morphology and Biomedical Sciences, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosaria Orlandi
1Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elda Tagliabue
1Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-4269 Published April 2012
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Proceedings: AACR 103rd Annual Meeting 2012‐‐ Mar 31‐Apr 4, 2012; Chicago, IL

Abstract

Our own recent analysis of extracellular matrix (ECM) gene expression profiles in breast carcinomas identified four different subgroups of breast tumors (ECM1, 2, 3 and 4) proposing a link between stroma composition and cancer progression (Bergamaschi et al. J. Pathol, 2008). Here, we further investigated the characteristics of ECM signature and its impact on tumor progression. The unsupervised clustering of 6 independent datasets, including more than 600 breast tumor samples, revealed that ECM3 was a robust cluster, presenting a homogeneous gene pattern that consistently allowed the identification of an independent group of tumors in all tested datasets. ECM3 is characterized by highly correlated over expression of 58 ECM genes encoding mainly structural proteins. From 26 to 41% of cases were ECM3-enriched and were mainly estrogen receptor-positive and low grade. Both tumor and stromal cells took part in the expression of ECM3 genes, and the hormonal and TGFβ stimuli appeared to highly contribute to ECM3 signature. Multivariate analysis of distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) in untreated breast carcinoma patients evidenced a statistically significant interaction between ECM3 and grade (p=0.0010), that is a different clinical significance in the subgroups grade I+II and grade III. Cox models estimated separately in the two groups indicated that ECM3 is strongly and significantly associated with worse survival probability only in grade III tumors (HR=3.0, 95% CI = 1.3 - 7.0, p=0.0098). It is noteworthy that the probability of developing metastases in a 10-year follow-up was 14% for ECM3 differentiated tumors (grade I+II) as compared to 61% for the ECM3 grade III carcinomas and about 25% for all non-ECM3 tumors. Moreover analysis of a data set of patients treated neoadjuvantly with chemotherapy revealed that, among the grade III tumors, pathological complete response was reached by 9% of ECM3 versus 74% of non-ECM3 tumors (p=0.04). In differentiated tumors no response difference was observed according to ECM. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) according to tumor cells differentiation revealed that among grade III, non-ECM3 tumors were enriched for genes representative of NK, T and B cells, and involved in cell cycle progression, while EMT, TGFβ and hypoxia genes were significantly up-modulated in ECM3 tumors, suggesting that aggressiveness of ECM3 grade III tumors may reflect the lack of immune cell engagement and an increased invasive phenotype. Our results provide evidence that breast carcinoma progression and response to therapy are influenced by the interaction between tumor and stromal characteristics. (Partially supported by AIRC)

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4269. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4269

  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research
Back to top
Cancer Research: 72 (8 Supplement)
April 2012
Volume 72, Issue 8 Supplement
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abstract 4269: Opposite effect of ECM features in breast carcinoma progression according to tumor cell differentiation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
Abstract 4269: Opposite effect of ECM features in breast carcinoma progression according to tumor cell differentiation
Tiziana Triulzi, Marco Sandri, Patrizia Casalini, Piera Aiello, Andrea Balsari, Rosaria Orlandi and Elda Tagliabue
Cancer Res April 15 2012 (72) (8 Supplement) 4269; DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-4269

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abstract 4269: Opposite effect of ECM features in breast carcinoma progression according to tumor cell differentiation
Tiziana Triulzi, Marco Sandri, Patrizia Casalini, Piera Aiello, Andrea Balsari, Rosaria Orlandi and Elda Tagliabue
Cancer Res April 15 2012 (72) (8 Supplement) 4269; DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-4269
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Tumor Biology

  • Abstract SY34-04: Do we need to know what pO2 hypoxia is
  • Abstract SY28-04: Rational incorporation of novel agents into multimodality treatment of glioma and neuroblastoma
  • Abstract SY28-02: Connections in the BRCA1-BRCA2 pathway of homologous recombination: Implications for breast cancer development and treatment
Show more 3

Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts

  • Abstract LB-236: Risk of tMDS/AML after chemotherapy for first primary lymphoid malignancy, 2000-2013
  • Abstract LB-001: Impact of direct physician engagement with racial/ethnic minorities for oncology clinical trial access and accrual model
  • Abstract LB-107: EV-TRACK: transparent reporting and centralizing knowledge of extracellular vesicles to support the validation of extracellular vesicle biomarkers in cancer research
Show more 3

Poster Presentations - Gene Expression and Epigenetic Regulation in Microenvironment

  • Abstract 4281: Adaptive post-translational regulation of the thiamine transporter THTR1 in breast cancer cells during hypoxic stress
  • Abstract 4277: Comparative gene expression analysis of proliferating stromal cells from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatitis and normal pancreas
  • Abstract 4272: An integrated platform for quantifying gene expression in co-cultured cells
Show more 3
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2018 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement