Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Clinical and Epidemiological Investigations

Flow Cytometric Determination of the Frequency and Heterogeneity of Expression of Human Melanoma-associated Antigens

David Berd, Meenhard Herlyn, Hilary Koprowski and Michael J. Mastrangelo
David Berd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meenhard Herlyn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hilary Koprowski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael J. Mastrangelo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published December 1989
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We used flow cytometry to measure the expression of human melanoma antigens on cell suspensions dissociated from metastatic masses. The objective was to study the heterogeneity between tumor samples from different patients and between different tumors excised from a single patient. Fifty-three metastases excised from 34 melanoma patients were analyzed with a panel of nine murine monoclonal antibodies (MOABs). Melanoma cells were stained by an indirect fluorescent method and analyzed on a Coulter EPICS C flow cytometer after gating to exclude tumor-infiltrating leukocytes and dead cells. The most consistently and most strongly expressed antigen was the high-molecular-weight proteoglycan (detected by the MOAB 9.2.27), which was expressed on 95% of the melanoma specimens and by a high proportion of cells within each specimen (mean ± SE, 79.2 ± 5.5). However, strong expression of this antigen was limited to melanoma cells that had been dissociated mechanically and was markedly diminished by exposure to collagenase. Culture of collagenase-dissociated tumor cells for 24 to 48 h resulted in reexpression of the antigen. The expression of other melanoma-associated antigens was not affected by collagenase treatment, but for these antigens there was more variability between cells from an individual tumor and between tumors from different patients. The percentage of enzyme-dissociated tumors considered positive for MOAB binding (defined as at least 10% of cells positive) and the mean ± SE of the percentage of positive cells within a tumor were as follows: MOAB ME-9-61 (antigen, p97) = 84% + (41.2 ± 5.4%); MOAB ME-20.4 (antigen, nerve growth factor receptor) = 40% + (18.7 ± 5.1%); MOAB ME-24 (antigen, ganglioside GD3) = 84% + (50.8 ± 4.8%); MOAB ME-311 (antigen, ganglioside 9-O-acetyl-GD3) = 76% + (42.5 ± 5.1%); MOAB ME-361 (antigen, mainly ganglioside GD2) = 3% + (1.9 ± 0.8%); MOAB 3F8 (antigen, ganglioside GD2) = 36% (10.5 ± 3.8%); MOAB 14G2a (antigen, ganglioside GD2) = 86% + (46.0 ± 6.7%); MOAB L243 (antigen, HLA-DR) = 56% + (22.5 ± 5.5%). In 19 cases, we were able to compare the antigenic profiles of two tumors excised from the same patient at different times. Analysis by nonindependent t test showed no significant differences in MOAB binding between the paired tumors. Moreover, linear regression analysis indicated that there was a linear relationship, with a slope approximately = 1, between the percentage of positive cells in Tumor 1 versus Tumor 2. Thus, flow cytometric analysis of cells dissociated from melanoma metastases gives a different perspective than previous studies performed with melanoma cell lines or with tissue sections. In particular, this study suggests that intrapatient heterogeneity of expression of MOAB-defined melanoma antigens may not be as important as previously estimated.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Supported by Grant CA 39248 from the National Cancer Institute and by funds from the Nat Pincus Endowment and from the Rae S. Uber Trust.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

  • Received January 18, 1989.
  • Revision received May 17, 1989.
  • Accepted August 28, 1989.
  • ©1989 American Association for Cancer Research.
PreviousNext
Back to top
December 1989
Volume 49, Issue 23
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Flow Cytometric Determination of the Frequency and Heterogeneity of Expression of Human Melanoma-associated Antigens
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Flow Cytometric Determination of the Frequency and Heterogeneity of Expression of Human Melanoma-associated Antigens
David Berd, Meenhard Herlyn, Hilary Koprowski and Michael J. Mastrangelo
Cancer Res December 1 1989 (49) (23) 6840-6844;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Flow Cytometric Determination of the Frequency and Heterogeneity of Expression of Human Melanoma-associated Antigens
David Berd, Meenhard Herlyn, Hilary Koprowski and Michael J. Mastrangelo
Cancer Res December 1 1989 (49) (23) 6840-6844;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Clinical and Epidemiological Investigations

  • Association between Hepatitis C Virus Antibodies and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
  • Evaluation of Nontumorous Tissue Damage by Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Comparison of Immunoscintigraphy and Computerized Tomography in Identifying Colorectal Cancer: Individual Lesion Analysis
Show more Clinical and Epidemiological Investigations

Articles

  • Association between Hepatitis C Virus Antibodies and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan
  • Evaluation of Nontumorous Tissue Damage by Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Comparison of Immunoscintigraphy and Computerized Tomography in Identifying Colorectal Cancer: Individual Lesion Analysis
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement