Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Immunology

Blockade of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Function by Bivalent and Monovalent Fragments of 225 Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies

Zhen Fan, Hideo Masui, Ian Altas and John Mendelsohn
Zhen Fan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideo Masui
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Altas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Mendelsohn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published September 1993
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We have previously described anti-epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) which can block binding of transforming growth factor α (TGF-α) and EGF to receptors and inhibit activation of receptor protein tyrosine kinase. Studies with these MAbs involving cell cultures and nude mouse xenografts demonstrated their capacity to inhibit the growth of a variety of tumor cell lines, which express EGF receptors and TGF-α and appear to depend upon receptor activation for cell proliferation. To explore the mechanism(s) by which anti-EGF receptor 225 MAb inhibits cell proliferation, we have compared the activity of native 225 MAb with the response to bivalent 225 F(ab′)2 and monovalent 225 Fab′ fragments. Both native 225 MAb and its fragments could inhibit the binding of 125I-EGF to EGF receptors. Scatchard analysis revealed that the Kd of F(ab′)2 is comparable to that of 225 MAb (1 nm), whereas the Kd of 225 Fab′ is 5 nm. Both bivalent 225 MAb and 225 F(ab′)2 and monovalent 225 Fab′ were able to completely inhibit TGF-α-induced EGF receptor tyrosine kinase activation, as assayed by autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues of EGF receptors on MCF10A nonmalignant human mammary cells, MDA468 human breast adenocarcinoma cells, and A431 human vulvar squamous carcinoma cells. The bivalent forms of MAb could inhibit proliferation stimulated by endogenous (autocrine) TGF-α in cultures of these three cell lines. They also blocked growth stimulation by added exogenous TGF-α in cultures of MCF10A cells and the growth-inhibitory effect of exogenous TGF-α upon MDA468 and A431 cell cultures. Monovalent 225 Fab′ had weaker inhibitiory effects upon the proliferation of these cell lines. To determine whether the in vivo antiproliferative activity of anti-EGF receptor MAb can occur without the participation of the Fc portion of MAb, the capacities of 225 F(ab′)2 and native 225 MAb to inhibit growth of s.c. A431 cell xenografts were compared. Equimolar amounts of either 225 MAb or 225 F(ab′)2 were administered at intervals equivalent to the half-lives of the molecules, to attempt to maintain comparable plasma levels. Both 225 MAb and 225 F(ab′)2 inhibited A431 cell xenograft growth in a dose-dependent manner, with a more sustained response in the case of the intact antibody.

These experiments establish the capacity of the bivalent 225 F(ab′)2 and monovalent 225 Fab′ fragments of an anti-EGF receptor antibody to mimic the properties of native 225 MAb in inhibiting ligand-induced tyrosine kinase activation, although the Fab′ fragment is a weaker inhibitor of proliferation compared with bivalent forms of antibody. They also provide strong evidence that inhibition of A431 cell growth in vivo can result from pharmacological blockade of EGF receptors, without participation of immune responses mediated by the Fc fragment of the antibody.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by NIH Grants CA42060 and CA37641.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Box 156, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021.

  • Received March 24, 1993.
  • Accepted July 12, 1993.
  • ©1993 American Association for Cancer Research.
PreviousNext
Back to top
September 1993
Volume 53, Issue 18
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Blockade of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Function by Bivalent and Monovalent Fragments of 225 Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Blockade of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Function by Bivalent and Monovalent Fragments of 225 Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies
Zhen Fan, Hideo Masui, Ian Altas and John Mendelsohn
Cancer Res September 15 1993 (53) (18) 4322-4328;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Blockade of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Function by Bivalent and Monovalent Fragments of 225 Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies
Zhen Fan, Hideo Masui, Ian Altas and John Mendelsohn
Cancer Res September 15 1993 (53) (18) 4322-4328;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Immunology

  • Abstract 6659: Response to nivolumab and ipilimumab in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cervical carcinoma with acquired resistance to pembrolizumab
  • Abstract 6606: Develop dual-targeted CAR-T cells to achieve RCC cures
  • Abstract 6646: Comprehensive cyclic immunofluorescent analysis reveals new target candidates for CAR T cell based immunotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme
Show more Immunology

Articles

  • The Prizes
  • Mammary Gland Development, Reproductive History, and Breast Cancer Risk
  • Pax Genes and Their Role in Organogenesis
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement