Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Regular Articles

Dioxin-responsive Genes: Examination of Dose-Response Relationships Using Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction

John P. Vanden Heuvel, George C. Clark, Michael C. Kohn, Angelika M. Tritscher, William F. Greenlee, George W. Lucier and Douglas A. Bell
John P. Vanden Heuvel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George C. Clark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael C. Kohn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angelika M. Tritscher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William F. Greenlee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George W. Lucier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas A. Bell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published January 1994
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiments was to examine dose-response relationships for induction of hepatic mRNA following a single administration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) to rats. The induction of cytochrome P450-1A1 (CYP1A1) mRNA is compared to other "dioxin-responsive" genes including UDP-glucuronosyltransferase I, plasminogen activator inhibitor 2, and transforming growth factor α using a sensitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-based method. Sample-to-sample variability in amplification is a concern in using polymerase chain reaction to quantitate biological responses. However, in the present study recombinant RNA templates were synthesized to use as internal standards in both the reverse transcription and the polymerase chain reaction steps. The induction of CYP1A1 mRNA was extremely sensitive to TCDD treatment with increases observed at doses as low as 1 ng/kg body weight. The induction of CYP1A1 mRNA correlated highly (R2 > 0.90) with an increase in ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase activity, a CYP1A1-associated enzyme activity. However, induction of CYP1A1 mRNA levels was detected at lower TCDD doses than was ethoxyresorufin-o-deethylase activity, reflecting the greater sensitivity of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction approach to detect transcriptional activation of the CYP1A1 gene. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase I mRNA was increased over control (5-fold) but required 1000-times higher TCDD doses (1 µg/kg) to result in a significant increase than did CYP1A1. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 and transforming growth factor α mRNA, both previously shown to be induced by TCDD in human keratinocytes, were not increased in rat liver. Hence, these studies reaffirm that TCDD acts through classical receptor mechanisms with gene-to-gene differences in responsiveness. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method developed to measure mRNA for dioxin-reponsive genes in rat liver will allow for measuring multigene and tissue responses to TCDD and other xenobiotics with high sensitivity, reproducibility, and adaptability and should increase our understanding of various dose-response relationships.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Received June 23, 1993.
  • Accepted November 1, 1993.
  • ©1994 American Association for Cancer Research.
PreviousNext
Back to top
January 1994
Volume 54, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dioxin-responsive Genes: Examination of Dose-Response Relationships Using Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Dioxin-responsive Genes: Examination of Dose-Response Relationships Using Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction
John P. Vanden Heuvel, George C. Clark, Michael C. Kohn, Angelika M. Tritscher, William F. Greenlee, George W. Lucier and Douglas A. Bell
Cancer Res January 1 1994 (54) (1) 62-68;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dioxin-responsive Genes: Examination of Dose-Response Relationships Using Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction
John P. Vanden Heuvel, George C. Clark, Michael C. Kohn, Angelika M. Tritscher, William F. Greenlee, George W. Lucier and Douglas A. Bell
Cancer Res January 1 1994 (54) (1) 62-68;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Regular Articles

  • Diosmin and Diosmetin Are Agonists of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor That Differentially Affect Cytochrome P450 1A1 Activity
  • IFN-γ Induces Cell Growth Inhibition by Fas-mediated Apoptosis: Requirement of STAT1 Protein for Up-Regulation of Fas and FasL Expression
  • Detection and Quantitation of Circulating Cancer Cells in the Peripheral Blood of Lung Cancer Patients
Show more Regular Articles

Biochemistry and Biophysics

  • Decreased Repair Activities of 1,N6-Ethenoadenine and 3,N4-Ethenocytosine in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients
  • Identification and Characterization of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Recruitment Sites within the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
  • A Novel Telomerase Template Antagonist (GRN163) as a Potential Anticancer Agent
Show more Biochemistry and Biophysics

Articles

  • Decreased Repair Activities of 1,N6-Ethenoadenine and 3,N4-Ethenocytosine in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients
  • Identification and Characterization of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Recruitment Sites within the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
  • A Novel Telomerase Template Antagonist (GRN163) as a Potential Anticancer Agent
Show more Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement