Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Advances in Brief

Sex Differences in Lung CYP1A1 Expression and DNA Adduct Levels among Lung Cancer Patients

Steen Mollerup, David Ryberg, Allan Hewer, David H. Phillips and Aage Haugen
Steen Mollerup
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Ryberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allan Hewer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David H. Phillips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aage Haugen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published July 1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Several epidemiological studies have indicated that female tobacco smokers may be at higher risk of lung cancer than males. In a study of lung cancer cases, we have found that female smokers had a significantly higher level of aromatic/hydrophobic DNA adducts in their nontumor lung tissue (15.39 ± 9.47 adducts/108 nucleotides, n = 29) than male smokers (12.08 ± 8.14, n = 93; P = 0.047). Females had significantly higher levels of adducts/pack-year (females 0.95 ± 0.82 adducts/pack-year and males 0.46 ± 0.46; P = 0.0004) and adducts/cigarette/day (females 1.48 ± 1.29 and males 0.89 ± 0.74, P = 0.015). By quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, it was found that female smokers exhibited a significantly higher expression level of lung CYP1A1 (494 ± 334 CYP1A1 mRNA/106 glyceraldehyde-3-phophate dehydrogenase mRNA, n = 15) compared with males (210 ± 208, n = 12; P = 0.016). Furthermore, for both sexes combined a significant correlation between CYP1A1 expression and DNA adduct level was found (r = 0.50, P = 0.009). In conclusion, the observed sex difference in aromatic/hydrophobic DNA adduct levels may at least in part be explained by different levels of CYP1A1 expression.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer in the world today, and the epidemic of this disease is still ongoing. Globally, carcinomas of the lung is the most common cause of cancer death, and cigarette smoking is widely accepted as the major risk factor for the incidence of lung cancer (1) . More attention is necessary on the issue of smoking and women because several epidemiological studies indicate that for a given number of cigarettes smoked, females may be at higher risk of lung cancer compared with males (2, 3, 4) . This sex difference may be due to a higher susceptibility to tobacco carcinogens among females.

PAHs 3 and nitroso compounds are considered to be carcinogens of major importance in tobacco smoke. The human CYP1A1 gene codes for a central enzyme in the metabolic activation of PAHs, leading to the formation of highly reactive diol-epoxides that may bind to DNA. Smoking-related DNA adducts in lung tissue may be a molecular exposure marker (5 , 6) . DNA adduct levels have been shown to correlate with the level of AHH activity (7) , which again correlates with the level of CYP1A1 mRNA (8) . A good correlation between the carcinogenic potency and DNA adduct formation ability has been observed experimentally for several carcinogens, including PAHs (for review, see Ref. 9 ). In humans, some studies have indicated that the level of hydrophobic DNA adducts may be a risk factor for the development of lung cancer (5 , 6 , 10) . In addition, among lung cancer patients, high levels of lung DNA adducts have been related to an early onset of the disease (11) .

CYP1A1 expression is induced by PAHs and halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons. In human lung tissue, CYP1A1 expression is inducible by cigarette smoking (8) . Both a high degree of interindividual variability in CYP1A1 inducibility, and a correlation between level of inducibility in human lymphocytes and risk of lung cancer have been demonstrated in smokers (12) . It seems that induction of CYP1A1 expression is controlled primarily at the level of transcription.

We have reported previously (11 , 13) a higher level of lung hydrophobic DNA adducts and a higher frequency of G:C→T:A transversions in the p53 gene in the lung tumors of smoking female lung cancer patients, which lends support to the hypothesis that females are at increased risk of developing smoke-induced lung cancer. To clarify this sex dependence of PAH-induced DNA adducts further, we have determined the levels of hydrophobic DNA adducts in nontumor lung tissue of lung cancer patients in the present, extended study. Furthermore, we have used quantitative competitive RT-PCR to study expression of the CYP1A1 gene in the lung tissue of currently smoking patients.

Materials and Methods

Study Population.

Samples of normal lung tissue adjacent to tumor tissue were resected at the time of surgery of 159 previously untreated lung cancer patients. The tissue was snap-frozen and stored at − 80°C. Demographic patient data on sex, age, and smoking history (see Table 1 ⇓ ) were obtained by questionnaires as described previously (11) . Hydrophobic DNA adduct levels were measured in 29 female and 93 male smokers as well as 13 female and 24 male nonsmokers (never-smokers and ex-smokers of 2 or more years of abstinence). CYP1A1 gene expression was studied in a subset consisting of 15 female and 12 male current smokers: mean age ± SD was 55 ± 13 years (females) and 60 ± 11 years (males; nonsignificant); smoking history was 12.2 ± 5.2 cigarettes/day (females) and 15.8 ± 7.1 cigarettes/day (males; nonsignificant); and pack-years was 20 ± 9 (females) and 30 ± 16 (males; P = 0.04).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Lung hydrophobic DNA adducts, smoking history, and age of female and male lung cancer patients

Quantitative RT-PCR.

Gene expression was determined using quantitative competitive RT-PCR modified from Celi et al. (14) and Willey et al. (15) . In brief, CYP1A1 and GAPDH cDNA (native) was amplified in the presence of known amounts of synthetic CTs derived from the respective cDNA sequences. The CTs give rise to PCR products that are identical to the native cDNA sequence apart from a deletion and will be amplified by the native primers. In each case, cDNA was titrated against the corresponding CT to determine the amount needed to result in equal levels of PCR products.

Total RNA was extracted from frozen nontumor lung tissue by the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD) following the supplier’s protocol. mRNA was reversibly transcribed by aid of the 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis kit for RT-PCR (1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-PCR [AMV], Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), using oligo-p(dT)15 primers. Primer sequences for quantitative competitive PCR CYP1A1 were: (a) CYP1A1 native upper 5′-CAT CCC CCA CAG CAC AAC AAG-3′; (b) CYP1A1 native lower 5′-AGA GCA GGC ATG CTT CAT GGT-3′; and (c) CYP1A1 CT lower 5′-AGA GCA GGC ATG CTT CAT GGT TCT CAC CGA TAC ACT TCC GCT-3′ (15) . These primers give rise to PCR-products of 355 bp (native) and 248 bp (CT). GAPDH primer sequences were: (a) GAPDH native upper 5′-ACA GTC CAT GCC ATC ACT GCC-3′; (b) GAPDH native lower 5′-GCC TGC TTC ACC ACC TTC TTG; and (c) GAPDH CT upper 5′-ACA GTC CAT GCC ATC ACT GCC ATC ATC CCT GCC TCT ACT GGC-3′. PCR products for GAPDH were 266 bp (native) and 200 bp (CT). The cDNA sequence for GAPDH was from the GenBank, and primer sequences were chosen using the Oligo software (National Biosciences, Plymouth, MN). For the PCR reactions, the DynaZyme II Thermostable recombinant DNA polymerase from Finnzymes Oy (Espoo, Finland) was used together with the supplier’s buffer conditions. Because of differences in mRNA levels of several orders of magnitude, CYP1A1 and GAPDH were amplified in separate reactions for 30 and 20 cycles, respectively, of 94°C for 20 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s]. PCR products were electrophoresed on 6.7% polyacrylamide gels (29:1), visualized by the SYBR Green I nucleic acid gel stain (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME), and photographed with a CCD camera. Levels of PCR products were measured by densitometric analysis of gel images using the public domain NIH Image program. All of the RT-PCR experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.

Aromatic/Hydrophobic DNA Adducts.

DNA was extracted from nontumor lung tissue and aromatic/hydrophobic DNA adducts were measured by 32P postlabeling analysis with the nuclease P1 modification as described previously (16) .

Statistical Analysis.

Student’s t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for the comparison of means. Association between the levels of CYP1A1 expression and hydrophobic DNA adducts was determined by linear regression analysis. Fitness to the linear regression model was ascertained by the examination of both a normal probability plot of the data points and residual values.

Results

In a pilot study, we have previously shown that female lung cancer patients have higher levels of DNA adducts in their normal lung tissue than males, when adjusted for smoking dose (11) . In the present study, the levels of hydrophobic/aromatic DNA adducts were measured in lung tissue from 159 lung cancer patients by 32P postlabeling with the nuclease P1 modification. As shown in Table 1 ⇓ , the levels of DNA adducts were highly significantly increased among both smoking females and smoking males compared with nonsmokers (P = 3 × 10−7 and P = 4 × 10−8, respectively). Significantly higher levels of DNA adducts were found among female smokers compared with male smokers (P = 0.047) although the latter had smoked more, verifying our previously published data (11) . When expressing DNA adduct levels in relation to smoking dose, we found that levels of adducts/pack-year (females, 0.95 ± 0.82, and males, 0.46 ± 0.46) and adducts/cigarette/day (females, 1.48 ± 1.29, and males, 0.89 ± 0.74) were significantly higher among females (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.015, respectively).

The expression of the CYP1A1 gene was determined in normal lung tissue from a subset consisting of currently smoking lung cancer patients. CYP1A1 expression was normalized to the expression of GAPDH by quantitative competitive RT-PCR as described in “Materials and Methods” (Fig. 1) ⇓ . Large interindividual variations were observed with a total range of 21–1122 CYP1A1 mRNA/106 GAPDH mRNA. When grouped by sex, a significantly higher mean CYP1A1 expression was found for females than for males (P = 0.016; Fig. 2) ⇓ .

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

A representative case of quantitative competitive RT-PCR measurement of (A) CYP1A1 and (B) GAPDH gene expression. RT-PCR was carried out as described in “Materials and Methods.” Arrows, PCR products originating from native cDNAs and CTs. The amount of template added in each PCR reaction is indicated on the figure (μl of cDNA and copies of CT, respectively). Gene expression was determined by densitometric scanning of digital images of the electrophoresis gels. M, PhiX174 RF DNA, HaeIII-digested molecular weight marker (bands of 310, 281, 271, 234, and 194 bp are shown).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Box plots of pulmonary CYP1A1 expression among currently smoking lung cancer patients grouped by sex. CYP1A1 mRNA expression (normalized to the expression of GAPDH) of individual cases was determined by densitometric analysis of quantitative competitive RT-PCR gels such as those presented in Fig. 1 ⇓ . Mean ± SD CYP1A1 expression was 494 ± 334 CYP1A1/106 GAPDH (95% confidence interval, 310–679; n = 15) for females and 210 ± 208 CYP1A1/106 GAPDH (95% confidence interval, 78–342; n = 12) for males (P = 0.016, Student’s t test).

Linear regression analysis revealed that the hydrophobic DNA adduct levels were significantly related to the level of CYP1A1 expression (with the exclusion of one outlier), r = 0.50, P = 0.009 (Fig. 3) ⇓ . The excluded data point from the linear regression analysis was found to be an outlier in a normal probability plot, as well as having a twice as high residual value as the data point with the second largest value. No correlation was found between CYP1A1 expression and either number of cigarettes smoked per day or age of the patients.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Correlation between CYP1A1 expression and hydrophobic DNA adducts. Individual measurements of hydrophobic DNA adduct levels were plotted against CYP1A1 mRNA expression (normalized to the expression of GAPDH) for both sexes combined. One outlier (○) was excluded from the analysis. Linear regression line is shown on the plot: n = 26, r = 0.50, P = 0.009.

Discussion

The formation of hydrophobic/aromatic DNA adducts in the lung is induced by PAH present in tobacco smoke. The metabolism of PAH is complex, including an activation reaction (Phase I) that involves members of the cytochrome P450 monooxygenases and a detoxifying conjugation reaction via the various Phase II enzymes. Several previous studies have shown significantly higher DNA adduct levels in smokers compared with nonsmokers (5 , 6 , 10) . Among smokers, our data showed that PAH-DNA adduct levels were inversely related to age, years of smoking, or pack-years. Years of smoking was the most significant single smoking-related parameter explaining the variation in adduct levels. Thus, it may be interpreted that some individuals are predisposed to high adduct levels without regard to the daily smoking dose. These individuals will statistically have an earlier onset of lung cancer than individuals with low adduct levels. In our study, females had significantly higher PAH-adduct levels than males and an earlier onset of the disease (lower mean age at the time of diagnosis). This indicates that females are more susceptible to PAH exposure than males, which confirms our previous results (11) .

AHH has been found to correlate with CYP1A1 mRNA (Ref. 8 and unpublished data). 4 In human lung tissue both CYP1A1 mRNA and AHH activity are induced by PAHs present in tobacco smoke (8 , 17) . To evaluate the role of AHH activity in the observed sex difference in smoke-induced DNA adducts, CYP1A1 gene expression was measured in currently smoking lung cancer patients. We found that females had significantly higher levels of CYP1A1 expression in their nontumor lung tissue than males. Because it has been reported that CYP1A1 gene expression is reduced as early as 2 weeks after smoking cessation (8) , only patients who were smoking up to the time of surgery were included in the CYP1A1 expression study.

We have used a highly reliable quantitative competitive RT-PCR method to study CYP1A1 expression, relating the CYP1A1 gene transcript to the expression of the GAPDH gene. Both cDNAs were amplified in the presence of CTs that were identical to the particular cDNA sequence apart from a deletion. Titration of the cDNA against known amounts of the respective template allowed accurate quantification of the expression. Because of a high degree of sequence homology between the genes for CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, the PCR primers for CYP1A1 cDNA amplification will also amplify CYP1A2 cDNA, which results in PCR products that are indistinguishable upon gel electrophoresis. However, CYP1A2 has been reported not to be expressed in human lung (18) . In addition, similar to the results reported in the present study, a significantly higher expression level of pulmonary CYP1A1 among smoking female lung cancer patients was found by using semiquantitative RT-PCR and primers that were specific for CYP1A1 only (19) .

Hydrophobic DNA adduct levels were found to be significantly related to the level of CYP1A1 expression, although a large interindividual variation was observed for both DNA adducts and CYP1A1 expression. In agreement with our data, a significant correlation has been demonstrated between AHH activity and DNA adducts in nontumor lung tissue of smoking lung cancer patients (20) . Considering the rapid turnover of CYP1A1 mRNA, and a half-life of 1.7 years for DNA adducts in bronchial tissue from ex-smokers (6 , 8) , we found a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.50, which means that 25% of the variation in the level of DNA adducts could be explained by the variation in CYP1A1 expression. Clearly, the level of DNA adducts is influenced by factors other than CYP1A1, such as exposure to PAH, Phase II metabolism, DNA repair processes, and cell turnover.

Several, although not all, epidemiological studies indicate that females may be at greater risk of developing lung cancer than males (2, 3, 4) . In addition to higher levels of smoking-induced CYP1A1 gene expression and higher levels of DNA adducts among female lung cancer patients, women seem to have higher frequencies of G:C→T:A base substitution mutations in the p53 gene (11 , 13 , 21) . Together, these data provide evidence for sex differences in lung cancer susceptibility at the genetic and biochemical level. The mechanism(s) is unknown, but the hypothesis of a possible role of hormones has been put forward (22) . In vitro studies have suggested complex interactions between the ER and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathways (23) . It is possible that circulating female steroid hormones(s) may interact with receptors present in the lung and modulate the expression of PAH metabolizing enzymes. Sex-steroid-receptor expression has been found to be more frequent in lung tumors from female than from male patients (24) . Expression of ER-α, as detected by immunocytochemistry, is infrequent in normal lung. Little is known about the expression of the recently cloned ER-β in adult human lung, but this receptor subtype has been demonstrated to be frequently expressed in rat lung tissue as well as in fetal human lung (25 , 26) .

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This study was supported by the Norwegian Cancer Society and the United Kingdom Cancer Research Campaign.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Toxicology, National Institute of Occupational Health, P. O. Box 8149 Dep, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: Steen.Mollerup{at}stami.no

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; CYP1A1, cytochrome P4501A1; AHH, aromatic hydrocarbon hydroxylase; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phophate dehydrogenase; CT, competitive template; ER, estrogen receptor.

  • ↵4 Unpublished data.

  • Received February 5, 1999.
  • Accepted June 1, 1999.
  • ©1999 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Peto R., Lopez A. D., Boreham J., Thun M., Heath C., Jr., Doll R. Mortality from smoking worldwide. Br. Med. Bull., 52: 12-21, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Engeland A. Trends in the incidence of smoking-associated cancers in Norway, 1954-93. Int. J. Cancer, 68: 39-46, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Zang E. A., Wynder E. L. Differences in lung cancer risk between men and women: examination of the evidence. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 88: 183-192, 1996.
  4. ↵
    Prescott E., Osler M., Hein H. O., Borch-Jonsen K., Lange P., Schnohr P., Vestbo J. Gender and smoking-related risk of lung cancer: The Copenhagen Center for Prospective Population Studies. Epidemiology, 9: 79-83, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Phillips D. H., Hewer A., Martin C. N., Garner R. C., King M. M. Correlation of DNA adduct levels in human lung with cigarette smoking. Nature (Lond.), 336: 790-792, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Schoket B., Phillips D. H., Kostic S., Vincze I. Smoking-associated bulky DNA adducts in bronchial tissue related to CYP1A1 MspI and GSTM1 genotypes in lung patients. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 841-846, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Alexandrov K., Rojas M., Geneste O., Castegnaro M., Camus A. M., Petruzzelli S., Giuntini C., Bartsch H. An improved fluorometric assay for dosimetry of benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide-DNA adducts in smokers’ lung: comparisons with total bulky adducts and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity. Cancer Res., 52: 6248-6253, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    McLemore T. L., Adelberg S., Liu M. C., McMahon N. A., Yu S. J., Hubbard W. C., Czerwinski M., Wood T. G., Storeng R., Lubet R. A., Eggleston J. C., Boyd M. R., Hines R. N. Expression of CYP1A1 gene in patients with lung cancer: evidence for cigarette smoke-induced gene expression in normal lung tissue and for altered gene regulation in primary pulmonary carcinomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 82: 1333-1339, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Kriek E., Rojas M., Alexandrov K., Bartsch H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in humans: relevance as biomarkers for exposure and cancer risk. Mutat. Res., 400: 215-231, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Tang D., Santella R. M., Blackwood A. M., Young T-L., Mayer J., Jaretzki A., Grantham S., Tsai W-Y., Perera F. P. A molecular epidemiological case-control study of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 4: 341-346, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  11. ↵
    Ryberg D., Hewer A., Phillips D. H., Haugen A. Different susceptibility to smoking-induced DNA damage among male and female lung cancer patients. Cancer Res., 54: 5801-5803, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Stücker I., Kremers P., Jacquet M., Genee S., de Waziers I., Beaune P., Hemon D. CYP1A1 inducibility, GSTM1, smoking and lung cancer. Results of a French case control study. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 39: 627 1998.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Kure E. H., Ryberg D., Hewer A., Phillips D. H., Skaug V., Bæra R., Haugen A. p53 mutations in lung tumors: relationship to gender and lung DNA adduct levels. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 2201-2205, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Celi F. S., Zenilman M. E., Shuldiner A. R. A rapid and versatile method to synthesize internal standards for competitive PCR. Nucleic Acids Res., 21: 1047 1993.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Willey J. C., Coy E. L., Frampton M. W., Torres A., Apostolakos M. J., Hoehm G., Schuermann W. H., Thilly W. G., Olson D. E., Hammersley J. R., Crespi C. L., Utell M. J. Quantitative RT-PCR measurement of cytochrome P450 1A1, 1B1, and 2B7, microsomal epoxide hydroxylase, and NADPH oxidoreductase expression in lung cells of smokers and nonsmokers. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., 17: 114-124, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Phillips D. H., Schoket B., Hewer A., Bailey E., Kostic S., Vincze I. Influence of cigarette smoking on the level of DNA adducts in human bronchial epithelium and white blood cells. Int. J. Cancer, 46: 569-575, 1990.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Antilla S., Hietanen E., Vainio H., Camus A.-M., Gelboin H. V., Park S. S., Heikkilä L., Karjalainen A., Bartsch H. Smoking and peripheral type of cancer are related to high levels of pulmonary cytochrome P450IA in lung cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer, 47: 681-685, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Raunio H., Hakkola J., Hukkanen J., Pelkonen O., Edwards R., Boobis A., Anttila S. Expression of xenobiotic-metabolizing cytochrome P450s in human pulmonary tissues. Arch. Toxicol. Suppl., 20: 465-469, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Mollerup S., Ryberg D., Hewer A., Phillips D. H., Skaug V., Haugen A. Gender differences in CYP1A1 expression among lung cancer patients. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 39: 337 1998.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Geneste O., Camus A-M., Castegnaro M., Petruzzelli S., Macchiarini P., Angeletti C. A., Giuntini C., Bartsch H. Comparison of pulmonary DNA adduct levels, measured by 32P-postlabeling and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity in lung parenchyma of smokers and ex-smokers. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 12: 1301-1305, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Guinee D. G., Jr., Travis W. D., Trivers G. E., De Benedetti V. M. G., Cawley H., Welsh J. A., Bennett W. P., Jett J., Colby T. V., Tazelaar H., Abbondanzo S. L., Pairolero P., Trastek V., Caparaso N. E., Liotta L. A., Harris C. C. Gender comparisons in human lung cancer: analysis of p53 mutations, anti-p53 antibodies and C-erbB-2 expression. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 993-1002, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Taioli E., Wynder E. L. Re: endocrine factors and adenocarcinoma of the lung in women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86: 869-870, 1994.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Thomsen J. S., Wang X., Hines R. N., Safe S. Restoration of aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) responsiveness in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells by transient expression of the estrogen receptor. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 15: 933-937, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Kaiser U., Hofmann J., Schilli M., Wegmann B., Klotz U., Wedel S., Virmani A. K., Wollmer E., Branscheid D., Gazdar A. F., Havemann K. Steroid-hormone receptors in cell lines and tumor biopsies of human lung cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 67: 357-364, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Brandenberger A. W., Tee M. K., Lee J. Y., Chao V., Jaffe R. B. Tissue distribution of estrogen receptor α (ER-α) and β (ER-β) mRNA in the midgestational human fetus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. & Metab., 82: 3509-3512, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kuiper G. G., Carlsson B., Grandien K., Enmark E., Haggblad J., Nilsson S., Gustafsson J. A. Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptor α and β. Endocrinology, 138: 863-870, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
July 1999
Volume 59, Issue 14
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex Differences in Lung CYP1A1 Expression and DNA Adduct Levels among Lung Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sex Differences in Lung CYP1A1 Expression and DNA Adduct Levels among Lung Cancer Patients
Steen Mollerup, David Ryberg, Allan Hewer, David H. Phillips and Aage Haugen
Cancer Res July 15 1999 (59) (14) 3317-3320;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sex Differences in Lung CYP1A1 Expression and DNA Adduct Levels among Lung Cancer Patients
Steen Mollerup, David Ryberg, Allan Hewer, David H. Phillips and Aage Haugen
Cancer Res July 15 1999 (59) (14) 3317-3320;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • NIMA-Related Protein Kinase 1 Is Involved Early in the Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Response
  • Conditional Expression of K-ras in an Epithelial Compartment that Includes the Stem Cells Is Sufficient to Promote Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis
  • Crucial Role of Phospholipase Cε in Chemical Carcinogen-Induced Skin Tumor Development
Show more Advances in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement