Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Expression of OVCA1, a Candidate Tumor Suppressor, Is Reduced in Tumors and Inhibits Growth of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Wendy Bruening, Amanda H. Prowse, David C. Schultz, Marina Holgado-Madruga, Albert Wong and Andrew K. Godwin
Wendy Bruening
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [W. B., A. H. P., D. C. S., A. K. G.]; Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18014 [D. C. S.]; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jefferson Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [M. H-M., A. W.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda H. Prowse
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [W. B., A. H. P., D. C. S., A. K. G.]; Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18014 [D. C. S.]; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jefferson Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [M. H-M., A. W.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Schultz
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [W. B., A. H. P., D. C. S., A. K. G.]; Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18014 [D. C. S.]; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jefferson Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [M. H-M., A. W.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marina Holgado-Madruga
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [W. B., A. H. P., D. C. S., A. K. G.]; Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18014 [D. C. S.]; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jefferson Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [M. H-M., A. W.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert Wong
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [W. B., A. H. P., D. C. S., A. K. G.]; Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18014 [D. C. S.]; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jefferson Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [M. H-M., A. W.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew K. Godwin
Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111 [W. B., A. H. P., D. C. S., A. K. G.]; Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 18014 [D. C. S.]; and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jefferson Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107 [M. H-M., A. W.]
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published October 1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Loss of all or part of one copy of chromosome 17p is very common in ovarian and breast tumors. OVCA1 is a candidate tumor suppressor gene mapping to a highly conserved region on chromosome 17p13.3 that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast and ovarian carcinomas. Western blot analysis of extracts prepared from breast and ovarian carcinomas revealed reduced expression of OVCA1 compared with extracts from normal epithelial cells from these tissues. Subcellular localization studies indicate that OVCA1 is localized to punctate bodies scattered throughout the cell but is primarily clustered around the nucleus. Attempts to create cell lines that stably expressed OVCA1 from the cytomegalovirus promoter were generally unsuccessful in a variety of different cell lines. This reduction of colony formation was quantified in the ovarian cancer cell line A2780, where it was demonstrated that cells transfected with plasmids expressing OVCA1 had a 50–60% reduction in colony number as compared with appropriate controls, and only a few of these clones expressed OVCA1, albeit at low levels. The clones that expressed exogenous OVCA1 were found to have dramatically reduced rates of proliferation. Reduced growth rates correlated with an increased proportion of the cells in the G1 fraction of the cell cycle compared with the parental cell line and decreased levels of cyclin D1. The low levels of cyclin D1 appeared to be caused by an accelerated rate of cyclin D1 degradation. Overexpression of cyclin D1 was able to override OVCA1’s suppression of clonal outgrowth. These results suggest that slight alterations in the level of OVCA1, such as would occur after reduction of chromosome 17p13.13 to hemizygosity, may result in cell cycle deregulation and promote tumorigenesis.

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer death among American women, yet little is known about the molecular evolution of ovarian tumors. Only a few candidate tumor suppressor genes in sporadic ovarian cancer have thus far been identified. Although two familial breast/ovarian cancer genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been identified, mutations in sporadic ovarian cancers are rare in these genes. Other recently identified tumor suppressor genes that have been analyzed for mutations in ovarian tumors include TSG101, PTEN, DPC4, and BARD1. However, there has been little evidence reported suggesting that these genes are important in the pathogenesis of sporadic ovarian cancers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . In addition, several interesting candidate tumor suppressor genes, DOC2, NOEY2, and LOT1, have recently been identified, and their roles in the development of ovarian cancer are currently being investigated (8, 9, 10, 11) . The TP53 tumor suppressor gene is, by far, the most frequently altered gene observed in ovarian cancer. In epithelial ovarian carcinomas, TP53 mutations are present in ∼50% of advanced-stage cancers. However, the low frequency of TP53 mutations in cancers confined to the ovary and the near absence of mutations in benign and borderline ovarian neoplasms suggest that TP53 alterations may be a relatively late event in the progression of ovarian cancer (12) .

LOH 4 for markers on the short arm of chromosome 17 is one of the most common genetic abnormalities in ovarian cancer. Two regions on 17p13, including TP53 at 17p13.1 and a more telomeric region at 17p13.3 defined by markers D17S5/30 (equivalent to YNZ22.1) and D17S28 (equivalent to YNH37.3), have received the most attention (13) . It has been reported that YNZ22.1 had a rate of LOH as high as 80%, and YNH37.3 showed >65% LOH in ovarian carcinomas. Loss at either D17S5/S30 or D17S28 was observed in 43% of low malignant potential tumors, 80% of carcinomas without metastases, and 90% of advanced-stage carcinomas. Interestingly, in the low malignant potential tumors, allelic losses at YNZ22.1 and YNH37.3 were not accompanied by LOH at TP53, suggesting the loss of a more distal tumor suppressor gene in early tumorigenesis (14 , 15) .

Alterations involving the NYH37.3/YNZ22.1 region on chromosome 17p13.3 are not limited to ovarian cancer. A recent study by the European Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium of 1280 breast tumors found that the frequency of LOH observed on the p arm of chromosome 17 was much higher than that observed on the q arm (16) . Up to two-thirds of breast tumors show LOH at the YNZ22.1 locus (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) , and this finding has been associated with markers of tumor aggression (16 , 23, 24, 25) . Breast tumors with LOH at YNZ22.1 have been associated with a higher risk of recurrence than those showing retention of this region (23 , 25) . This same region shows frequent LOH in small cell lung cancers (26, 27, 28) , colon cancers (29) , primitive neuroectodermal tumors (30, 31, 32) , carcinoma of the cervix uteri (33, 34, 35, 36) , medulloblastoma (37, 38, 39, 40) , astrocytoma (41 , 42) , follicular thyroid carcinoma (43) , malignant melanoma (44) , hepatocellular carcinoma (45) , and leukemia and lymphoma (46) . In many of these studies, changes on chromosome 17p13.3 occur in the absence of alterations involving TP53, suggesting that a tumor suppressor gene(s) residing in this region on chromosome 17p13.3 may be involved in the development of many types of cancers.

We have previously reported the identification of a common region of allelic loss on 17p13.3 in ovarian cancer defined by the markers D17S28 and D17S5/S30 (47) . These two loci span <20 kbp (47) . By the use of positional cloning strategies, two candidate tumor suppressor genes, OVCA1 and OVCA2, have been identified that map to the region that is most commonly lost in ovarian and breast tumors, chromosome 17p13.3 (47 , 48) . OVCA1 demonstrates sequence similarity (20% identity) to one of the yeast enzymes in the diphthamide synthetic pathway, DPH2, and to a number of proteins of unknown function from a variety of organisms, including yeasts, plants, insects, and mammals, indicating that this putative protein family is conserved throughout evolution. However, the amino acid sequence of OVCA1 does not demonstrate any conservation with the sequence of any known functional motif (47 , 48) . Northern blot analysis revealed that OVCA1 mRNA expression was lost or dramatically reduced in ovarian tumors and ovarian tumor cell lines (as compared with normal ovarian epithelial cells), indicating that loss or reduction of OVCA1 expression may contribute to ovarian tumorigenesis (47) .

Studies in which genes are expressed in tumor cells have provided proof for the pivotal role of TP53, RB, CDKN2A/p16, and BRCA1 in reverting the transformed phenotype of tumor cells (49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55) . Here, we report that OVCA1 can inhibit proliferation of ovarian tumor cells. In addition, we report the identification of genetic alterations of OVCA1 in ovarian tumor cell lines and in high-risk breast cancer families. These data strongly suggests that OVCA1 is a viable candidate for the breast and ovarian tumor suppressor gene at 17p13.3.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents and Cell Lines.

Cell culture reagents were from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD); unless otherwise indicated, most other reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) or were derived in our laboratory (HOSE, human ovarian surface epithelial cell lines grown in primary culture; and HIO cell lines, SV40-immortalized human ovarian epithelial cells). A2780 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.2 IU/ml porcine insulin. COS-1, MCF-7, and MDA-MB8 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS. T47D cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.2 IU/ml porcine insulin. SKBR3 cells were maintained in McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 10% FCS. HOSE cells and HIO cell lines were maintained in a 1:1 mixture of medium 199 and MCDB-105 medium, supplemented with 5% FCS and 0.2 IU/ml porcine insulin. Unless otherwise stated, cells were transfected with Superfect (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), as described by the manufacturer. The A2780 clones that stably express OVCA1 were obtained after selection in G418 by standard methods and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 0.5 mg/ml G418.

SSCP Analysis of OVCA1.

PCR was carried out in a reaction volume of 10 μl containing 100 ng of genomic DNA template, 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mm KCl, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 0.001% gelatin, 1 μm forward and reverse primers, 60 μm dNTPs, 0.1 μCi of [32P]dATP (DuPont-NEN, Boston, MA), 5% DMSO, and 0.5 unit of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA). Following an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 4 min, DNA was amplified through 20 cycles consisting of 5 s of denaturing at 94°C, 1 min of annealing at 65°C − 0.5°C/cycle, and 1 min of extension at 72°C. The samples were then subjected to an additional 25 cycles, consisting of 1 min of denaturation at 94°C, 1 min of annealing at 55°C, and 1 min of extension at 72°C and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were diluted 1:10 in 95% formamide, 10 mm NaOH, 0.25% bromphenol blue, and 0.25% xylene cyanol. Diluted products were denatured for 5 min at 95°C and flash-cooled on ice. Four μl were loaded onto a 0.5× MDE gel (AT Biochem, Malvern, PA), prepared according to manufacturer’s specifications, and electrophoresed at 6 W for 12–16 h at room temperature in 0.6× TBE [1× TBF, 0.09 m Tris, 0.09 m boric acid, and 0.002 m EDTA (pH 8.0)]. Following electrophoresis, the gel was dried and exposed to autoradiography film at −80°C for 4–24 h. Variant and normal SSCP bands were cut out from the gels after alignment with the autoradiograph, and the DNA was eluted in 100 μl of distilled deoionized H2O at 37°C for 3 h. Two μl of the eluted DNA were used as template for secondary PCRs, as described above, except that radiolabeled dATP was omitted. Following amplification, the DNA was collected on Wizard resin (Promega, Madison, WI) and eluted in 50 μl of distilled deoionized H2O, and 50–100 fmol of purified PCR product were subjected to direct sequencing.

Plasmids.

The eukaryotic expression vectors pcDNA3 and pcDNA3-LacZ were obtained from Invitrogen. The HA antibody tag (YPYDVPDYA) was added to the COOH or NH2 terminus of the OVCA1 cDNA by standard PCR technology, and the resulting tagged cDNAs were subcloned into pcDNA3 and are referred to as pcDNA3-HAOVCA1 or pcDNA3-OVCA1HA, depending on the location of the HA tag. The plasmid pGFP-C1, which expresses green fluorescent protein, was obtained from Clontech. The cDNA of OVCA1 was fused to the COOH terminus of the green fluorescent protein at the BglII site to generate the plasmid pGFP-OVCA1. To prepare a GST fusion of OVCA1 in bacteria, we subcloned the OVCA1 cDNA, containing an NH2-terminal HA tag, into pGEX-2T (Pharmacia).

Production of Anti-OVCA1 Antibodies.

The 13-amino acid peptide, RDGPGRGRAPRGC, corresponding to amino acids 20–31 of OVCA1 (where the terminal cysteine was added for conjugation purposes) was synthesized (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL). Purity of the peptide was confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The peptide was conjugated to malemide activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and used to immunize a New Zealand White rabbit (Cocalico, Reamstown, PA). Two mg of antigenic peptide were covalently linked to Aminolink agarose (Pierce) and used to purify anti-OVCA1 antibody from crude serum by affinity chromatography. The final antibody is referred to as TJ132. The antibody FC21 was produced by immunizing a New Zealand White rabbit (Cocalico) with a bacterially expressed carboxyl terminal portion of OVCA1 (amino acids 330–443). The resulting antiserum was immunoaffinity purified on Aminolink agarose covalently linked to bacterially expressed GST-OVCA1.

Purification of Bacterially Expressed OVCA1.

BL21 bacteria were transformed with pGEX2T-OVCA1. Expression of the fusion protein was induced with 1 mm isopropyl-β-thio-galactopyranoside (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The bacteria were lysed by sonication, and GST-OVCA1 was purified from the soluble fraction by binding to glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia). Pure OVCA1 was released by digesting with thrombin (Pharmacia), or the GST-OVCA1 fusion was eluted with excess glutathione. PET-OVCA1 (nucleotides 1011–1350) was expressed in BL21 bacteria and purified as an insoluble inclusion body by repeated washing of the insoluble fraction with 1% Triton X-100. The insoluble pellet was solubilized in 8 m urea-2% SDS. The protein (OVCA1 amino acids 330–443) was further purified by SDS-PAGE. The gel slice containing the protein was homogenized and used to immunize rabbits.

Preparation of Protein Extracts from Human Tumor Specimens.

Normal human tissues were obtained from Clontech. Tumors were snap-frozen after surgical removal and stored in liquid nitrogen until use. One g of tumor tissue was rinsed twice with cold PBS and minced finely into small pieces. Tissue pieces were suspended in 1 ml of PBSTDS [0.137 m NaCl, 2.68 mm KCl, 10.6 mm Na2HPO4, 1.47 mm K2H2PO4, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.5% (w/v) deoxycholate, 0.1% (v/v) SDS, 0.004% (w/v) NaF, 100 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mg/ml aprotinin, 1 mg/ml leupeptin, and 2 mm sodium orthovandate, (pH 7.4)] and ground with a Polytron tissue grinder at 300–400 rpm for two 30-s intervals at 4°C. Tissue homogenates were clarified by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 hour at 4°C. Lipid layers were removed, and cytosolic extracts were aliquoted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. Quantitation of protein was achieved using a bicinchoninic acid/copper (II) sulfate assay (Sigma).

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis.

Fifty μg of total protein extract from tissues or 20 μg of total protein from cell extracts, unless otherwise stated, were separated by standard SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P (polyvinylidene difluoride; Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were blocked with 3% BSA and probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132, or blocked with 3% dried milk and probed with the indicated antibody. The signal was visualized using anti-rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP (Amersham) and developed using ECL reagents, as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham).

Subcellular Fractionation.

HOSE cells were homogenized in ice-cold hypotonic homogenization buffer [40 mm Tris (pH 7.4), 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 1 mm DTT, and 10% glycerol]. The nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and insoluble debris was pelleted at 180,000 × g for 30 min to give the cytosol fraction. The nuclear pellet was washed twice with homogenization buffer containing 0.1 m KCl. The nuclear pellet was then extracted with homogenization buffer plus 0.45 m KCl for 1 h on ice, with frequent vortexing. Insoluble debris was pelleted at 180,000 × g for 30 min to obtain the nuclear fraction.

Immunofluorescent Staining and Imaging.

COS-1 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids using Lipofectamine (Life Technologies, Inc.) or Superfect (Qiagen), as directed by the manufacturer. Forty-eight h after transfection, the cells were visualized. For green fluorescent proteins, the living cells were observed with a Nikon TE 800 upright microscope. For visualizing HA-tagged OVCA1 proteins, the cells were fixed for 20 min in 3.7% formaldehyde-PBS and then for 30 s in methanol. The cells were then stained with an anti-HA rabbit polyclonal antibody Y-11 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) in TBS [50 mm Tris (pH 8.0) and 140 mm NaCl] plus 0.03% Triton X-100 and 10% FCS. The staining was visualized with an antirabbit antibody coupled to Texas Red (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratory, Inc.). The stained cells were observed on a Biorad MRC 600 laser scanning confocal microscope, using COMOS Version 7.0.1 software. The images were rendered and pseudocolored with Voxel View 2.5.1 (Vital Images) software. Final prints were made using a codonics dye sublimation printer.

Stable Colony Formation Assay.

A2780 cells (2.5 × 105 per 60-cm plate) were cotransfected with 5 μg of pcDNA3-LacZ and 2.5 pmol of pcDNA3 control vector, pcDNA3-HAOVCA1, or p53 expression plasmid or the cyclin D1 expression plasmid. At 24 h posttransfection, G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml, or cells were stained for transient β-galactosidase activity. Antibiotic selection was continued for 10–14 days. Colonies were fixed with 0.2% formaldehyde and stained with 0.2% (w/v) crystal violet, and colonies containing >50 cells were scored.

Growth Curve Analysis.

Cells were removed from the flask by trypsinization. The trypsin was inactivated by addition of complete medium to a final volume of 10 ml. One hundred μl of cell suspension were diluted in 20 ml of Isoton solution (Coulter, Miami, FL), and the number of cells quantified on a Z1 Coulter counter (Coulter). Cells (200,000) were plated in triplicate in 35-mm tissue culture dishes and incubated at 37°C and 5.0% CO2. Cells were counted in 24-h intervals by trypsinization and resuspension of cells in 10 ml of Isoton (Coulter) and counted on the Z1 Coulter counter (Coulter).

Pulse-Chase Labeling.

Cells were seeded into 60-mm dishes and grown until they were 60% confluent. They were starved in minus-methionine medium (ICN) for 30 min, and then Trans35-Label (ICN) was added to 500 μCi/ml and the cells were labeled for 30 min. The radioactive medium was removed, and the cells were washed with large volumes of complete medium and then incubated in complete medium for the indicated times. The cells were then lysed in 100 μl of PBSTDS. Insoluble debris was pelleted, and the lysates were diluted 10-fold into RIPA buffer [10 mm Tris (pH 8.0), 150 mm NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, and 0.5% deoxycholate]. Anti-cyclin D1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added and the immunoprecipitates were collected on Protein A beads (Life Technologies, Inc.) and washed well with RIPA buffer. The immunoprecipitates were released by boiling in SDS-PAGE loading buffer and were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. The amount of label incorporated into cyclin D1 was quantitated by Phosphoimager (Fuji).

FACS Analysis of Stable Transfectants.

Cells (500,000) were seeded in 10 ml of complete medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml G418. Seventy-two h postseeding, cells were harvested and 1 million cells were prepared for FACS analysis by resuspending cell pellets in 1 ml of staining buffer [3.4 mm sodium citrate, 10 mm NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) NP40, and 75 mm ethidium bromide] and stored at 4°C for no more than 3 days. The cells were filtered through a 37-μm nylon mesh and then analyzed by a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Data for 20,000 events were gathered by CellQuest (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and analyzed by MacCycle (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA).

TUNEL Staining.

Cells were plated on coverslips and stained for TUNEL using an in situ cell death detection kit, as recommended by the manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim).

RESULTS

Mutational Analysis of OVCA1 by SSCP.

SSCP analysis was conducted on 50 ovarian tumors independent of LOH status for markers on 17p13.3 and on 20 breast tumors demonstrating allelic loss of OVCA1 and retention of TP53. Multiple sequence variants were identified throughout the gene (Fig. 1 ⇓ ; Table 1 ⇓ ). These sequence variants were deemed to be polymorphisms because these same alterations were either found in the corresponding germ line or resulted in either conservative or silent amino acid substitutions. The frequency of these putative polymorphisms was determined by SSCP analysis of 100 chromosomes from control individuals (Table 1) ⇓ . In addition, we identified two nonconservative amino acid substitutions: alanine 34 changed to an aspartic acid residue and serine 389 changed to an arginine residue. Each alteration was detected in the germ line of a woman with early-onset breast cancer who reported a family history of the disease. In both cases, the missense mutation/rare polymorphism was retained in the corresponding breast tumor DNA and showed reduction to homozygosity (data not shown). Evaluation of >100 control chromosomes has failed to detect these sequence variants. The individual carrying the A34D missense variant was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 37 and reported a history of one first-degree relative and two second-degree relatives with the disease (ages of onset unknown). The individual carrying the S389R missense variant was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 49. She reported that her mother was affected with breast cancer at age 55 and that two maternal aunts were diagnosed with the disease at 61 and 65 years of age. The functional significance of these mutations is not yet clear; preliminary experiments exploring their effect on the OVCA1 protein are presented below.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Mutational analysis of OVCA1. Each exon and its surrounding intronic regions was amplified by PCR and analyzed for sequence variants by SSCP, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Examples of the SSCP gel patterns are shown for 10 tumor samples for exons 1, 6, and 9. The exon 1 region has several sequence variants, shown in Lanes 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 (left to right); exon 6 has one sequence variant, shown in Lanes 7, 8, and 9; and exon 9 has one sequence variant, shown in Lanes 5 and 9. All variants seen by SSCP were verified by directly sequencing a separate PCR.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Nucleotide sequence variants observed in OVCA1 in tumorsa

Southern Blot Analysis of OVCA1.

To assess deletions or rearrangements within the OVCA1 gene, we performed Southern blotting of 60 normal/ovarian tumor DNA pairs using the full-length OVCA1 cDNA as the probe. The vast majority of the tumors had lost one copy of the OVCA1 gene. No rearrangements or large interstitial deletions were detected in the remaining copy. However, a 7-kbp EcoRI fragment was observed to be variable in length due to changes in the VNTR, i.e., YNH37.3, which is intragenic to OVCA1 (data not shown). We did not observe any correlation between the length of the VNTR fragment and an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.

Western Blot Analysis of OVCA1.

Conceptual translation of OVCA1 predicts a 443-amino acid protein with Mr ∼50,000. An antibody that recognizes 11 amino acids at the NH2 terminus of OVCA1 was prepared by immunizing rabbits with a peptide. The antiserum was affinity-purified and was designated TJ132. Another antibody that recognizes the COOH terminus of OVCA1 (amino acids 330–443) was prepared by immunoaffinity purification following immunization of rabbits with a bacterially expressed polypeptide and was designated FC21. Both antibodies were able to recognize bacterially expressed OVCA1 by Western blotting (data not shown). In addition, these antibodies were able to recognize a protein of Mr ∼50,000 in extracts prepared from COS-1 cells that had been transiently transfected with pcDNA3-HAOVCA1 and in whole-cell lysates from the ovarian tumor cell line A2780 (Fig. 2A) ⇓ . Recognition of this Mr 50,000 protein could be competed with a molar excess of the antigenic peptide, indicating that the antibodies recognize the authentic OVCA1 protein (data not shown). In addition to the Mr 50,000 protein, both antibodies detected proteins of Mr ∼85,000, as observed in extracts prepared from a variety of sources, including normal human tissues, primary cultures of HOSE cells and a number of cell lines (Figs. 2 ⇓ and 3 ⇓ ; data not shown). The NH2-terminal antibody TJ132 also recognized proteins of Mr ∼70,000, but these species were variable in amount and presence and were not recognized by antibodies directed against the COOH terminus of the protein. The secondary antibody alone did not recognize any of the three proteins (Mr 50,000, 70,000, and 85,000; data not shown). The identity of the Mr 70,000 and Mr 85,000 proteins is unknown, as are their relationships with the Mr 50,000 OVCA1 protein; however, the available evidence suggests that the Mr 85,000 form is an alternatively spliced or posttranslationally modified form of OVCA1 and that the p70 form is either unrelated to OVCA1 or is a breakdown product of the p85 form. Alternatively, the p85/p70 forms could be unrelated, cross-reacting proteins. However, this is unlikely because completely different anti-OVCA1 antibodies recognize the p85 protein, and recognition of the Mr 85,000 protein by TJ132 can be competed with a molar excess of the antigenic peptide. Because FC21 and TJ132 gave almost identical patterns by Western blotting (Fig. 2B) ⇓ , most of the data shown used only the antibody TJ132.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Characterization of OVCA1 expression. A, extracts from the indicated tissues and cell lines were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P, as described in “Materials and Methods.” The blot was then probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Lane IVT, in vitro translated pcDNA3-HAOVCA1; Lane COS, extract of COS-1 cells that had been transfected with pcDNA3-HAOVCA1; Lane A2780, extract of the ovarian tumor cell line A2780; Lane H. ovary, extract of whole human ovary. Arrowheads, three different polypeptides that TJ132 recognizes (p50, p70, and p85). B, 20 μg of each indicated cell line extract were separated in duplicate by 10% PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P, and probed with the indicated antibodies, as described in “Materials and Methods.” One of the duplicate blots was probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132, and the other was probed in parallel with the anti-OVCA1 antibody FC21. OVCAR-5 is a cell line derived from an ovarian tumor, whereas T47D and SKBR3 are cell lines derived from breast tumors. C, 50 μg of extracts from various human tissues (Clontech) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and processed for Western blotting, as described in “Materials and Methods.” The blot was probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132. Lane H, heart; Lane B, brain; Lane P, placenta; Lane L, lung; Lane Li, liver; Lane S, skeletal muscle; Lane K, kidney; Second Lane P, pancreas; Second Lane S, spleen; Lane T, thymus; Lane M, mammary gland; Lane Te, testis; Lane O, ovary.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Expression of OVCA1 in tumors. A, 50 μg of each sample were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P, as described in “Materials and Methods.” The blot was probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132. UPN, extracts from primary tumors; MCF-7 and MDA-MB8, extracts from cell lines derived from breast tumors; N.M.E*, extract from normal breast epithelial cells grown in short-term primary tissue culture. Equal loading of the blots was confirmed by staining with Coomassie Blue for total protein after probing. B, protein extracts (50 μg) from primary ovarian tumors (UPN), normal human ovarian surface epithelial cell lines (HIO), and a normal ovary (Ovary) were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P, as described in “Materials and Methods.” The blot was probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132. Equal loading of the blots was confirmed by staining the blots for total protein with Coomassie Blue after probing.

OVCA1 was found to be expressed in many different tissues (Fig. 2C) ⇓ . In some cases, the Mr 70,000 and Mr 85,000 proteins were very prominent, whereas the Mr 50,000 protein was less so (notably the ovary and placenta) and, in other tissues, the p50 form was predominant (liver and thymus). Note that, although extracts from total breast tissue appeared to express little or no OVCA1 (Fig. 2C) ⇓ , breast epithelial cells did express the p50 OVCA1 protein (Fig. 3A ⇓ , N.M.E.*). We explain this apparent discrepancy as being due to epithelial cells making up only a low percentage of the total breast. Analysis of breast and ovarian tumor extracts demonstrated variable expression levels of p50 and an almost complete absence of the p70/p85 species (Fig. 3) ⇓ . Expression levels of p50 were reduced as compared to normal epithelial cells in 21 of 59 ovarian (37%) and 18 of 46 breast (39%) carcinomas. p85 and p70 were not detected in the majority of tumors analyzed (100% of breast tumors and 85% of ovarian tumors) (Fig. 3) ⇓ . No correlation was evident between reduced expression and clinical prognostic factors.

Subcellular Localization of OVCA1.

To aid in understanding the function of OVCA1, we determined its subcellular localization. COS-1 cells were transfected with either an empty vector pcDNA3 or with pcDNA3-OVCA1HA, which expresses OVCA1 fused to a COOH-terminal HA tag. Immunostaining of transfected cells with an anti-HA antibody (Y-11; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) indicates that OVCA1 is located throughout the cell. A widespread diffuse staining was seen, in addition to strongly staining punctate bodies (Fig. 4 A and B) ⇓ . These bodies were scattered throughout the cell and were heavily clustered around the nucleus. A similar pattern was obtained in immortalized HOSE cells transfected with pcDNA3-OVCA1HA and when the cells were immunostained with the specific anti-OVCA1 antibody, TJ132 (data not shown). To further confirm the localization, we fused OVCA1 to the COOH terminus of the green fluorescent protein. COS-1 cells expressing the green fluorescent protein-OVCA1 fusion again demonstrated a punctate, primarily perinuclear localization of the protein set against a weaker, diffuse staining throughout the cell (data not shown).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Subcellular localization of OVCA1. COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA3 or with pcDNA3-OVCA1HA. Forty-eight h after transfection, the cells were fixed and stained with an anti-HA tag antibody (Y-11; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), as described in “Materials and Methods.” A, cells transfected with pcDNA3; B, cells transfected with pcDNA3-OVCA1HA. At the level of sensitivity needed to obtain high resolution of the OVCA1HA staining, the mock-transfected cells are not visible. C, subcellular fractionation of SV40-immortalized human ovarian surface epithelial cell lines (HIO). Cell lines were fractionated as described in “Materials and Methods,” and 50 μg of the corresponding extracts were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P. The Western blot shown was probed with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132. Lane WCL, whole-cell extract; Lane C, cytoplasmic fraction; Lane N, nuclear fraction.

Fractionation studies confirmed that the Mr 50,000 OVCA1 protein is located throughout the cell (Fig. 4C) ⇓ . However, the Mr 70,000 and Mr 85,000 species appeared to be exclusively located within the nucleus (Fig. 4C) ⇓ .

Suppression of Clonal Outgrowth.

Attempts to generate cell lines that stably expressed OVCA1 were unsuccessful. Very few clones were found to express OVCA1, and those that did expressed only low levels of the protein. This phenomenon was consistently observed in a number of different cell types (RAT-1, U2OS, MCF-7, HIO118, and T47D cells; data not shown). To quantitate this effect, we transfected equimolar amounts of a mammalian expression vector containing the NH2-terminal HA-tagged OVCA1 open reading frame (pcDNA3-HAOVCA1) and an empty expression vector (pcDNA3) into the ovarian cancer cell line A2780. A2780 cells were chosen for further analysis because they are well-characterized ovarian tumor cells that normally express fairly low levels of OVCA1 p50 and almost no p85/p70 OVCA1 (Fig. 2) ⇓ . As a positive control for growth suppression, an expression vector that expresses wild-type p53 protein was included in some of the colony number experiments. Evaluation of colony formation in the presence of geneticin (G418) consistently resulted in a 50–60% reduction in colony number in cells transfected with the OVCA1 expression construct compared with controls (Fig. 5 A) ⇓ . This effect was reproducibly observed in more than four independent transfection experiments. Suppression of clonal outgrowth was independent of plasmid DNA purity (we tested three different preparations of plasmid DNA) whether equivalent molar amounts or microgram amounts of plasmid were transfected. Furthermore, experiments in which an expression vector containing the gene encoding for the β-galactosidase protein were cotransfected with OVCA1 indicate that the reduction in clonal outgrowth is not an artifact due to differences in transfection efficiency (data not shown).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Suppression of clonal outgrowth by OVCA1 in A2780 ovarian cancer cells. A2780 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and selected for resistance to G418, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Ten to 14 days posttransfection, the colonies were stained and counted. A, the percentage of G418 (NeoR) colonies that formed relative to the number formed after transfection with pcDNA3 (defined as 100% in each experiment) along the ordinate. Abscissa, data from eight independent transfection experiments. A wild-type TP53 expression vector was included in some experiments as a positive control for colony suppression. B, the total number of colonies obtained after transfection with the indicated plasmids and selection with G418. pcDNA3 is the parent vector; OVCA1HA expresses the wild-type OVCA1 plus a COOH-terminal HA tag; and A34D and S389R refer to the point mutations, discussed in the text, that were introduced into the wild-type OVCA1HA construct using standard PCR technology. Columns, means of three independently repeated experiments; bars, SD.

The A34D and S389R alterations described above, detected in the germ line of women with breast cancer and with a strong family history of the disease, were rebuilt into the pcDNA3-OVCA1HA expression plasmid using standard PCR technology. Both altered proteins were expressed well in transient transfection assays (data not shown). However, both alterations were found to suppress colony formation 50–60%, as compared with controls, similar to wild-type OVCA1 (Fig. 5B) ⇓ .

Growth Kinetics of Stable Transfectants.

To verify that the suppression effect was due to exogenous OVCA1 expression, individual colonies were clonally expanded after G418 selection. A total of seven colonies from pcDNA3 vector control transfected cells and 15 colonies from pcDNA3-HAOVCA1 transfected cells were amplified following selection in G418 for 10 days. All colonies selected from pcDNA3 vector control plates expanded and formed stable cultures. In contrast, only 9 of 15 colonies selected from pcDNA3-HAOVCA1 transfected cells expanded to form a stable culture. Because an in-frame HA epitope was fused to the open reading frame of OVCA1 at the NH2 terminus, the level of exogenous protein produced in these clones could be monitored. Western blot analysis revealed that there was approximately equimolar expression of exogenous and endogenous OVCA1 in only four of nine stable pcDNA3-HAOVCA1 clones (OV-5, OV-6, OV-9, and OV-13; Fig. 6 ⇓ ).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Maintenance of exogenous OVCA1 expression in stable transfectants of A2780 ovarian cancer cells. A2780 cells were transfected with an HAOVCA1 expression vector and then selected for resistance to G418, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Clones were chosen at random and amplified. After amplification, extracts were prepared from the cells, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Ten μg of each extract were separated by duplicate 10% SDS-PAGE. The gels were transferred to Immobilon-P and probed with the indicated antibodies, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Top, total OVCA1 antigen was detected with the anti-OVCA1 antibody TJ132. Bottom, exogenous OVCA1 antigen was detected with the anti-HA mAB 16B12 (BabCo, Richmond, CA). Lane COS, protein extract prepared from COS cells transiently transfected with an HAOVCA1 expression vector; Lanes A2780, protein extract prepared from the parental cell line; Lanes CMV, cell lines derived from pcDNA3 transfected cells; Lanes OV, cell lines derived from HAOVCA1-transfected cells.

Of the HAOVCA1 transfectants with exogenous expression, no major differences in morphological features were observed when compared to parental A2780 cells (data not shown). Cells were plated at limited dilutions and monitored for growth kinetics. Two independent clones, OV-5 and OV-13, displayed ∼8- and 10-fold reductions in total cell number compared with expression vector controls and parental A2780 cells, respectively. A third clonal line, OV-9, demonstrated a 4-fold reduction in total cell number over the same time interval compared with controls (Fig. 7A) ⇓ . On the basis of these growth curves, the cell doubling times between parental A2780 and OVCA1-expressing stable clones were found to be considerably different. A2780 cells doubled 2–2.5 times during a 24-h period, whereas OV-5, OV-9, and OV-13 doubled ∼1–1.5 times during the same time interval. Consistent with the reduced growth rate, the clones stably expressing OVCA1 had a dramatic reduction in cyclin D1 levels (Fig. 7B) ⇓ . The reduction of steady-state cyclin D1 levels appeared to be primarily due to an increased rate of degradation of cyclin D1 in cells expressing HAOVCA1 compared with the parental cell line (Fig. 7C) ⇓ .

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Suppression of growth rate by OVCA1. A, the proliferation of A2780 clonal lines was monitored over time, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Vector (□; CMV-5) is A2780 cells that have stably integrated the plasmid pcDNA3; HAOVCA1-5 (•; OV-5) and HAOVCA1-9 (▴; OV-9) are two lines that stably express OVCA1. The parental cell line, A2780, gave results that were virtually identical to those of the CMV-5 cell line (data not shown), and the stably expressing OVCA1 clone OV-13 gave results similar to that of OV-5 (data not shown). The graph represents the growth rates for the cell lines over the indicated time period and is representative of a number of independent experiments. Ordinate, number of cells (104); abscissa, days in 24-h time points. B, OVCA1 expression (Western blot probed with the anti-HA tag antibody Y-11; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and cyclin D1 expression (the Western blot showing OVCA1 expression was reprobed with an anti-cyclin D1 antibody; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in the indicated cell lines: Lane 1, CMV-5; Lane 2, OV-5; Lane 3, OV-9. The parental cell line, A2780, gave results that were virtually identical to those of the CMV-5 cell line (data not shown), and the stably expressing OVCA1 clone OV-13 gave results that were similar to those of OV-5 (data not shown). C, the stability of cyclin D1 was monitored by pulse-chase [35S]methionine labeling of the indicated cells followed by immunoprecipitation of the labeled cyclin D1. The immunoprecipitates were separated on SDS-PAGE and quantitated by Phosphoimager (Fuji). Abscissa, minutes after initiation of the chase; ordinate, relative units of labeling incorporated into cyclin D1. The graph is representative of a number of independent experiments.

FACS Analysis of Stable Transfectants.

Two main mechanisms, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, may account for the growth suppression observed in stable clones expressing exogenous OVCA1. To investigate the mechanism of growth suppression, we seeded parental A2780 cells and each of the stable transfectants at an equal number of cells. Seventy-two h postseeding, the cells were harvested, nuclei were stained with ethidium bromide, and cell cycle distribution was measured by FACS analysis. As illustrated in Fig. 8 ⇓ , a 10–20% increase in the number of cells in the G1 fraction was observed in clones OV-5, OV-9, and OV-13 compared with parental A2780 cells and stable vector control cells, CMV-5. No subdiploid cell peaks suggestive of apoptosis were observed. To further investigate the possibility of apoptosis playing a role in reduced cell number, we subjected clones OV-5 and OV-9 to TUNEL staining and compared them with the vector control cells. There were no TUNEL-positive cells on the vector control cell slides. A total of 1.2% of the OV-9 cells were TUNEL-positive, and 4% of the OV-5 cells were TUNEL-positive, suggesting that, although rates of apoptosis are slightly elevated in A2780 cells stably expressing OVCA1, apoptosis does not fully account for the drastic reduction in growth rates (data not shown).

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

FACS analysis of stable transfectants. Cell cycle distributions were determined 72 h postseeding by flow cytometry, as described in “Materials and Methods.” DNA profiles represent cell number (counts) along the ordinate and DNA content (PI/FL2) along the abscissa. Percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle is listed on the right. G1, both the G0 and G1 populations of cells; S, the population of cells in DNA synthesis; G2, both the G2 and M populations of cells.

Cyclin D1 Overexpression Can Partially Overcome OVCA1’s Suppression of Clonal Outgrowth.

Reduction of cyclin D1 levels by OVCA1 may be the primary cause of OVCA1’s growth-suppressive effect. To test this theory, we cotransfected A2780 cells with pcDNA3-OVCA1HA and CMV-cyclin D1. The cells were transfected with pcDNA3 alone, pcDNA3-OVCA1HA alone, CMV-cyclin D1 alone, or both pcDNA3-OVCA1HA and CMV-cyclin D1. pcDNA3 and pskII were added as necessary to equalize the amount of selectable marker and plasmid DNA in each transfection. After selection for 14 days in G418, the colonies were fixed, stained, and counted. As noted previously, cells transfected with the OVCA1 expression construct formed ∼50% fewer colonies than did cells transfected with pcDNA3 (Fig. 9) ⇓ . Cells transfected with the cyclin D1 expression vector formed almost as many colonies as did cells transfected with pcDNA3. Cells cotransfected with pcDNA3-OVCA1HA and CMV-cyclin D1 formed ∼75% fewer colonies than did cells transfected with pcDNA3 and almost the same number of colonies formed by cells transfected with CMV-cyclin D1 alone, suggesting that overexpression of cyclin D1 can compensate for overexpression of OVCA1.

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Overexpression of cyclin D1 can override OVCA1’s suppression of clonal outgrowth. A2780 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids, as described in “Materials and Methods.” Resistant colonies were selected in G418 for 14 days and then they were fixed and stained. Colonies with >50 cells were counted. The experiment was repeated three times. pcDNA-3, transfected with 1 μg of pcDNA3 and 1 μg of pskII; CMV-OVCA1, transfected with 1 μg of pcDNA3-OVCA1HA and 1 μg of pskII; CMV-cyclin D1, transfected with 1 μg of CMV-cyclin D1 (carries no selectable marker) and 1 μg of pcDNA3; CMV-OVCA1+-cyclin D1 was transfected with 1 μg of pcDNA3-OVCA1HA and 1 μg of CMV-cyclin D1.

DISCUSSION

Molecular studies of human neoplasms suggest that a tumor suppressor locus exists on chromosome 17p13.3 near the VNTR markers YNH37.3 and YNZ22.2 (14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ,, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) . To date, only two genes have been reported that map within the critical region of allelic loss on chromosome 17p13.3: OVCA1 and OVCA2 (47 , 48) . We have found that OVCA2 cannot suppress tumor cell proliferation. 5 The amino acid sequence of OVCA1 contains little information with regard to its biological function. The only portion of the protein that is similar to previously identified proteins is a region in the NH2 terminus that is similar to a domain found in a number of proteins isolated from a variety of species (47 , 48) . Unfortunately, the function of this domain is unclear. The only member of this putative gene family to which a function has been assigned is the yeast protein DPH2, which is known to play a role in the synthesis of diphthamide (56) . It is unlikely that OVCA1 is the human homologue of the yeast dph2 because at least one other human gene, DPH2L2, is more similar to the yeast dph2 than is OVCA1 (57) .

Screening of a panel of primary breast (n = 20) and ovarian (n = 50) tumors for alterations of OVCA1 revealed two distinct missense changes and multiple polymorphisms in both the coding and noncoding regions. Both missense changes were detected in breast tumors, and each alteration was present in the germ line of a woman with a strong family history of this disease. In both cases, the missense mutation/rare polymorphism was retained in the corresponding breast tumor DNA and showed reduction to homozygosity. Evaluation of >100 control chromosomes failed to detect these sequence variants. The probands do not have unusual ancestries, indicating that the sequence alterations are unlikely to be related to a specific ethnic group. Unfortunately, the probands are deceased, and we do not have informed consent to contact other members of their respective families. Both of these probands have tested negative for germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. 6 However, neither amino acid substitution alters OVCA1’s ability to suppress colony formation, suggesting that either these alterations are nonfunctional polymorphisms or that they affect some as yet undefined function of OVCA1 or perhaps alter the function of the p85 form of OVCA1. Our observation is of particular significance because, in a recent European Consortium study, an association between LOH at the OVCA1 locus and a positive family history of breast cancer was observed (16) .

We also assessed ovarian tumors for large alterations involving the OVCA1 gene by Southern blotting; however, no rearrangements or large interstitial deletions were detected. One previous study has reported a homozygous deletion in an ovarian carcinoma that involved both D17S28 and D17S30 but not any other flanking markers (15) . Overall, no somatic mutations were detected within the coding region of OVCA1 at the DNA level in either primary breast or ovarian tumors.

Because OVCA1 does not appear to be commonly mutated in tumors and tumor cell lines, we sought to determine whether changes in its protein levels are more frequent in breast and ovarian cancer. Western blot analysis of extracts from breast and ovarian tumors suggest that expression of p50 OVCA1 is reduced in at least one-third of the tumor specimens evaluated. The larger putative forms of OVCA1 (p70/p85) are absent or highly reduced in almost 100% of the tumor specimens evaluated. The mechanism whereby the p70/p85 forms of OVCA1 are generated is as yet unclear. Several different antibodies raised against different regions of OVCA1 recognize the larger isoforms, confirming that they are closely related to the p50 OVCA1. Most likely, the p85 form is the product of an as yet undefined alternatively spliced exon or posttranslational modification. The p70 form is not recognized by antibodies directed against the COOH terminus of OVCA1, suggesting that it is either a degradation product of the p85 form or an unrelated, cross-reacting protein. If reduction of OVCA1 levels is important in tumorigenesis, then reintroduction of OVCA1 into tumor cell lines should revert, at least partially, the transformed phenotype. Because the p85/p70 isoforms are most consistently lost from tumors, reintroduction of these forms would be most informative. However, because they have not yet been completely defined, our experiments were confined to reintroduction of the p50 isoform. Attempts to stably express OVCA1 from the CMV promoter in a variety of cell lines were unsuccessful. This phenomenon crossed species lines, being apparent in cells derived from both rodents and primates; was independent of p53 status; and was evident in both immortalized and transformed cells, suggesting that overexpression of OVCA1 either blocks growth or is toxic to the cells.

Overexpression of OVCA1 in the ovarian cancer cell line A2780 provided some clues about the function of OVCA1. It was possible to isolate a few clones that expressed exogenous OVCA1. In all cases, the level of exogenous expression was not high and was, at most, equivalent to the amount of OVCA1 normally seen in A2780 cells. Cells expressing exogenous OVCA1 were found to have a 4-fold (OV-9) to 10-fold (OV-13) reduction in growth compared with parental A2780 cells. The cellular mechanisms by which OVCA1 suppresses growth could fall into three categories: apoptosis, replicative senescence, or cell cycle arrest. On the basis of the amino acid sequence of OVCA1, it is unclear which, if any, of these pathways OVCA1 may affect. It is unlikely that OVCA1 promotes cell death to any great extent. TUNEL labeling and FACS analysis suggest that, although the OVCA1 stably expressing clones have a slightly elevated rate of apoptosis, it is not significant enough to account for the dramatic reduction in proliferation rates. It is also unlikely that exogenous OVCA1 restores replicative senescence because stable overexpression of OVCA1 did not affect rates of colony outgrowth (data not shown).

Cell cycle analysis of the OVCA1 stably expressing clones suggests that decelerated growth was associated with an increased percentage of the population in the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle. We observed a reduction of cyclin D1 levels caused by destabilizing the protein, and this may be the direct cause of the slowed proliferation rates. In support of this hypothesis, cotransfection of cyclin D1 was able to override OVCA1’s suppression of clonal outgrowth. Cyclin D levels are primarily regulated at the transcriptional level in response to extracellular mitogenic stimulation; however, in the absence of such stimulation, cyclin D is rapidly degraded by calpain proteases (Ref. 58 ; reviewed in Ref. 59 ). It is not yet clear as to how increased levels of OVCA1 leads to destabilization of cyclin D1. Deregulation of cyclin D1 has been implicated in the generation of many types of tumors. In some tumors, overexpression of cyclin D1 is achieved by amplification of the cyclin D1 gene (reviewed in Ref. 60 ). However, in other tumors, including ovarian tumors, overexpression of cyclin D1 is not associated with genetic alterations, suggesting that some other mechanism, perhaps an increase in stability, is the cause of the abnormality (61 , 62) .

Analyses of ovarian and other tumors clearly indicate that allelic loss of chromosome 17p13.13 is one of the more frequently observed molecular alterations; >70% of ovarian tumors, at least two-thirds of breast tumors, and many other types of tumors have lost part or all of one copy of chromosome 17 (see “Introduction”). It was previously thought that both alleles of a tumor suppressor gene must be inactivated, as addressed by the “two-hit” hypothesis for tumorigenesis of Knudson (63) . However, it has recently been shown that genes such as the murine gene p27/kip1 and the PTEN gene are haploinsufficient for tumor suppression (64 , 65) . Abnormally low levels of the p27 protein are frequently found in human carcinomas (66, 67, 68, 69, 70) . However, it had never been possible to establish a causal link between p27 and tumor suppression because only rare instances of homozygous inactivating mutations of the p27 gene were found in human tumors (71, 72, 73, 74) . However, it was shown that both p27 nullizygous and p27 heterozygous mice were predisposed to tumors in multiple tissues when challenged with γ-irradiation or a chemical carcinogen (64) . Molecular analyses of tumors in p27 heterozygous mice showed that the remaining wild-type allele was neither mutated nor silenced (64) . The PTEN gene encodes a dual-specificity phosphatase mutated in a variety of human cancers (75, 76, 77) . PTEN germ-line mutations are found in three related human autosomal dominant disorders, CD, LDD, and BZS, characterized by tumor susceptibility and developmental defects (78, 79, 80) . It was recently reported that PTEN+/− mice and chimeric mice derived from PTEN+/− embryonic stem cells showed hyperplastic/dysplastic changes in the prostate, skin, and colon, which are characteristic of CD, LDD, and BZS, respectively (65) . They also spontaneously developed germ cell, gonadostromal, thyroid, and colon tumors, suggesting that PTEN haploininsufficiency plays a causal role in CD, LDD, and BZS (65) . These studies, therefore, suggest that there is another class of tumor suppressor genes, in which genes that exhibit haploinsufficiency, leading to reduced levels of the protein, are important for tumorigenesis.

The data presented here and elsewhere, i.e., high rate of allelic loss observed for chromosome 17p13.3 in ovarian tumors, the reduced expression of OVCA1 in ovarian tumors, and the observation that an equimolar level of exogenous p50 OVCA1 suppresses the growth rate of tumor cells up to 10-fold, suggest that a slight reduction in the level of expression of OVCA1 is sufficient for loss of growth regulation. The high rate of loss of one copy of chromosome 17p in breast and ovarian tumors may contribute to carcinogenesis by reducing OVCA1 to hemizygosity. Future efforts aimed at clarifying the biochemical function of OVCA1 will aid in confirming the role that this gene has in tumorigenesis as well as its normal cellular function.

Acknowledgments

We thank John Boyd for his help with the microscopy and Lisa Vanderveer for her technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported in part by NIH Grant RO1 CA70328, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (Contract DAMD17-96-1-6088), the Hoxie Harrison Smith Foundation, the Butler Family Fund, and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. W. B. was supported by a fellowship from the NIH.

  • ↵2 The first three authors contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue, Room W-304, Philadelphia, PA 19111. Phone: (215) 728-2756; Fax: (215) 728-2741; E-mail: a_godwin{at}fccc.edu

  • ↵4 The abbreviations used are: LOH, loss of heterozygosity; SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism; HA, hemagglutinin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling; VNTR, variable number of tendem repeats; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CD, Cowden disease; LDD, Lhermitte-Duclos disease; BZS, Bennayan-Zonena syndrome.

  • ↵5 T. White and A. Prowse, unpublished observations.

  • ↵6 A. K. Godwin, unpublished observations.

  • Received September 15, 1998.
  • Accepted August 5, 1999.
  • ©1999 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Thai T. H., Du F., Tsan J. T., Jin Y., Phung A., Spillman M. A., Massa H. F., Muller C. Y., Ashfaq R., Mathis J. M., Miller D. S., Trask B. J., Baer R., Bowcock A. M. Mutations in the BRCA1-associated RING domain (BARD1) gene in primary breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7: 195-202, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Carney M. E., Maxwell G. L., Lancaster J. M., Gumbs C., Marks J., Berchuck A., Futreal P. A. Aberrant splicing of the TSG101 tumor suppressor gene in human breast and ovarian cancers. J. Soc. Gynecol. Invest., 5: 281-285, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Gayther S. A., Barski P., Batley S. J., Li L., de Foy K. A., Cohen S. N., Ponder B. A., Caldas C. Aberrant splicing of the TSG101 and FHIT genes occurs frequently in multiple malignancies and in normal tissues and mimics alterations previously described in tumours. Oncogene, 15: 2119-2126, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Obata K., Morland S. J., Watson R. H., Hitchcock A., Chenevix-Trench G., Thomas E. J., Campbell I. G. Frequent PTEN/MMAC mutations in endometroid but not serous or mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors. Cancer Res., 58: 2095-2097, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Maxwell G. L., Risinger J. I., Tong B., Shaw H., Barrett J. C., Berchuck A., Futreal P. A. Mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene is not a feature of ovarian cancers. Gynecol. Oncol., 70: 13-16, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Yokomizo A., Tindall D. J., Hartmann L., Jenkins R. B., Smith D. I., Liu W. Mutation analysis of the putative tumor suppressor PTEN/MMAC1 in human ovarian cancer. Int. J. Oncol., 13: 101-105, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Schutte M., Hruban R. H., Hedrick L., Cho K. R., Nadasdy G. M., Weinstein C. L., Bova G. S., Isaacs W. B., Cairns P., Nawroz H., Sidransky D., Casero R. A. J., Meltzer P. S., Hahn S. A., Kern S. E. DPC4 gene in various tumor types. Cancer Res., 56: 2527-2530, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Yinhua Y., Fengji X., Peng H., Fang X., Zhao S., Li Y., Cuevas B., Kuo W. L., Gray J. W., Siciliano M., Mills G. B., Bast R. C. NOEY2 (ARHI), an imprinted putative tumor suppressor gene in ovarian and breast carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 214-219, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Mok S. C., Chan W. Y., Wong K. K., Cheung K. K., Lau C. C., Ng S. W., Baldini A., Colitti C. V., Rock C. O., Berkowitz R. S. DOC-2, a candidate tumor suppressor gene in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncogene, 16: 2381-2387, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Abdollahi A., Godwin A., Miller P., Getts L., Schultz D., Taguchi T., Testa J., Hamilton T. Identification of a gene containing zinc-finger motifs based on lost expression in malignantly transformed rat ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cancer Res., 57: 2029-2034, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Abdollahi A., Roberts D., Godwin A., Schultz D., Sonoda G., Testa J., Hamilton T. Identification of a zinc-finger gene at 6q25: a chromosomal region implicated in the development of many solid tumors. Oncogene, 14: 1973-1979, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Godwin A., Schultz D., Hamilton T., Knudson A. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes Hoskins W. Perez C. Young R. eds. . Principles and Practice of Gynecological Oncology, : 107-148, J. B. Lippincott Co. Philadelphia 1997.
  13. ↵
    Lynch H. T., Casey M. J., Lynch J., White T. E. K., Godwin A. K. Genetics and ovarian carcinoma. Semin. Oncol., 25: 265-280, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Phillips N., Ziegler M. R., SaHa B., Xynos F. Allelic loss on chromosome 17 in human ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 54: 85-91, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Phillips N., Ziegler M., Radford D., Fair K., Steinbrueck T., Xynos F., Donis-Keller H. Allelic deletion on chromosome 17p13.3 in early ovarian cancer. Cancer Res., 56: 606-611, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Phelan C., Borg A., Cuny M., Crichton D., Baldersson T., Andersen T., Caligo M., Lidereau R., Lindblom A., Seitz S., Kelsell D., Hamann U., Rio P., Thorlacius S., Papp J., Olah E., Ponder B., Bignon Y-J., Scherneck S., Barkardottir R., Borresen-Dale A-L., Eyfjord J., Theillet C., Thompson A., Devilee P., Larsson C. Consortium study on 1280 breast carcinomas: allelic loss on chromosome 17 targets subregions associated with family history and clinical parameters. Cancer Res., 58: 1004-1012, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Mackay J., Elder P., Steel C., Forrest A., Evans H. Allele loss on short arm of chromosome 17 in breast cancers. Lancet, 17: 1384-1385, 1988.
  18. ↵
    Devilee P., Pearson P., Cornelisse C. Allele losses in breast cancer. Lancet, 1: 154 1989.
  19. ↵
    Singh S., Simon M., Meybohm I., Jantke I., Jonat W., Maass H., Goedde H. Human breast cancer: frequent p53 allele loss and protein overexpression. Hum. Genet., 90: 635-640, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Cornelis R., van Vliet M., Vos C., Cleton-Jansen A-M., van de Vijver M., Peterse J., Khan P., Borresen A-L., Cornelisse C., Devilee P. Evidence for a gene on 17p13.3 distal to TP53, as a target for allele loss in breast tumors without p53 mutations. Cancer Res., 54: 4200-4206, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Harada Y., Katagiri T., Ito I., Akiyama F., Sakamoto G., Kasumi F., Nakamura Y., Emi M. Genetic studies of 457 breast cancers. Cancer (Phila.), 74: 2281-2286, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Stack M., Jones D., White G., Liscia D., Venesio T., Casey G., Crichton D., Varley J., Mitchell E., Heighway J., Santibanez-Koref M. Detailed mapping and loss of heterozygosity analysis suggests a suppressor locus involved in sporadic breast cancer within a distal region of chromosome band 17p13.3. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4: 2047-2055, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Thompson A., Crichton D., Elton R., Clay M., Chetty U., Steel C. Allelic imbalance at chromosome 17p13 (YNZ22) in breast cancer is independent of p53 mutation or p53 overexpression and is associated with poor prognosis at medium-term follow-up. Br. J. Cancer, 77: 797-800, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Ito I., Yoshimoto M., Iwase T., Watanabe S., Katagiri T., Harada Y., Kasumi F., Yasuda S., Mitomi T., Emi M., Nakamura Y. Association of genetic alterations on chromosome 17 and loss of hormone receptors in breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 71: 438-441, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Nagai M. A., Medeiros A., Brentani M. M., Marques L. A., Mazoyer S., Mulligan L. M. Five distinct deleted regions on chromosome 17 defining different subsets of human primary breast tumor. Oncogene, 52: 448-453, 1995.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Marchetti A., Buttitta F., Merlo G., Diella F., Pellegrini S., Pepe S., Macchiarini P., Chella A., Angeletti A., Callahan R., Bistocchi M., Squartini F. p53 alterations in non-small cell lung cancers correlate with metastatic involvement of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Cancer Res., 53: 2846-2851, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Takahashi T., Nau M. M., Chiba I., Birrer M. J., Rosenberg R. K., Vinocour M., Levitt M., Pass H., Gazdar A. F., Minna J. D. p53: a frequent target for genetic abnormalities in lung cancer. Science (Washington DC), 246: 491-494, 1989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Konishi H., Takahashi T., Kozaki K., Yatabe Y., Mitsudomi T., Fujii Y., Sugiura T., Matsuda H., Takahashi T., Takahashi T. Detailed deletion mapping suggests the involvement of a tumor suppressor gene at 17p13.3, distal to p53, in the pathogenesis of lung cancers. Oncogene, 17: 2095-2100, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Baker S., Fearon E., Nigro J., Hamilton S., Preisinger A., Jessup J., vanTuinen P., Ledbetter D., Barker D., Nakamura Y., White R., Vogelstein B. Chromosome 17 deletions and p53 gene mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Science (Washington DC), 244: 217-221, 1989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Haataja L., Raffel C., Ledbetter D., Tanigami A., Petersen D., Heisterkamp N., Groffen J. Deletion within the D17S34 locus in a primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Cancer Res., 57: 32-34, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Biegel J., Rorke L., Janss A., Sutton L., Parmiter A. Isochromosome 17q demonstrated by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 14: 85-96, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Biegel J., Burk C., Barr F., Emanuel B. Evidence for a 17p tumor related locus distinct from p53 in pediatric primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Cancer Res., 52: 3391-3395, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Park S-Y., Kang Y-S., Kim B-G., Lee S-H., Lee E-D., Lee K-H., Park K-B., Lee J-H. Loss of heterozygosity on the short arm of chromosome 17 in uterine cervical carcinomas. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 79: 74-78, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Kersemaekers A-M., Kenter G., Hermans J., Fleuren G., van de Vijver M. Allelic loss and prognosis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int. J. Cancer, 79: 411-417, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Kersemaekers A., Hermans J., Fleuren G., van de Vijver M. Loss of heterozygosity for defined regions on chromosomes 3, 11 and 17 in carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Br. J. Cancer, 77: 192-200, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Atkin N. B., Baker M. C. Chromosome 17p loss in carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 37: 229-233, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Saylors R., Sidransky D., Friedman H. S., Bigner S. H., Bigner D. D., Vogelstein B., Brodeur G. M. Infrequent p53 gene mutations in medulloblastomas. Cancer Res., 51: 4721-4723, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    McDonald J., Daneshvar L., Willert J., Matsumara K., Waldman F., Cogen P. Physical mapping of chromosome 17p13.3 in the region of a putative tumor suppressor gene important in medulloblastoma. Genomics, 23: 229-232, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Scheurlen W., Krauss J., Kuhl J. No preferential loss of one parental allele of chromosome 17p13 in childhood medulloblastoma. Int. J. Cancer, 63: 372-374, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Cogen P., Daneshvar L., Metzger A., Duyk G., Edwards M., Sheffield V. Involvement of multiple chromosome 17p loci in medulloblastoma tumorigenesis. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 50: 584-589, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Chattopadhyay P., Rathore A., Mathur M., Sarkar C., Mahapatra S., Sinha S. Loss of heterozygosity of a locus on 17p13.3, independent of p53, is associated with higher grades of astrocytic tumours. Oncogene, 15: 871-875, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Saxena A., Clark W., Robertson J., Ikejiri B., Oldfield E., Ali I. Evidence for the involvement of a potential second tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 17 distinct from p53 in malignant astrocytomas. Cancer Res., 52: 6716-6721, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Grebe S., McIver B., Hay I., Wu P., Maciel L., Drabkin H., Goellner J., Grant C., Jenkins R., Eberhardt N. Frequent loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 3p and 17p without VHL or p53 mutations suggests involvement of unidentified tumor suppressor genes in follicular hybrid carcinoma. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 82: 3684-3691, 1997.
  44. ↵
    Tomlinson I., Gammack A., Stickland J., Mann G., MacKie R., Kefford R., McGee J. D. Loss of heterozygosity in malignant melanoma at loci on chromosomes 11 and 17 implicated in the pathogenesis of other cancers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 7: 169-172, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    Nishida N., Fukuda Y., Kokuryu H., Toguchida J., Yandell D., Ikenega M., Imura H., Ishizaki K. Role and mutational heterogeneity of the p53 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res., 53: 368-372, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Sankar M., Tanaka K., Kumaravel T., Arif M., Shintani T., Yagi S., Kyo T., Dohy H., Kamada N. Identification of a commonly deleted region at 17p13.3 in leukemia and lymphoma associated with 17p abnormality. Leukemia (Baltimore), 12: 510-516, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Schultz D. C., Vanderveer L., Berman D. B., Hamilton T. C., Wong A. J., Godwin A. K. Identification of two candidate tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 17p13.3. Cancer Res., 56: 1997-2002, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Phillips N. J., Ziegler M. R., Deaven L. L. A cDNA from the ovarian cancer critical region of deletion on chromosome 17p13.3. Cancer Lett., 102: 85-90, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Baker S. J., Markowitz S., Fearon E. R., Willson J. K., Vogelstein B. Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53. Science (Washington DC), 249: 912-915, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Bookstein R., Shew J. Y., Chen P. L., Scully P., Lee W. H. Suppression of tumorigenicity of human prostate carcinoma cells by replacing a mutated RB gene. Science (Washington DC), 247: 712-715, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Eliyahu D., Michalovitz D., Eliyahu S., Pinhasi-Kimhi O., Oren M. Wild-type p53 can inhibit oncogene-mediated focus formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 8763-8767, 1989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Finlay C. A., Hinds P. W., Levine A. The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation. Cell, 57: 1083-1093, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Holt J. T., Thompson M. E., Szabo C., Robinson-Benion C., Arteaga C. L., King M. C., Jensen R. A. Growth retardation and tumour inhibition by BRCA1. Nat. Genet., 12: 298-302, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Huang H. J. S., Yee J. K., Shew J. Y., Chen P. L., Bookstein R., Friedmann T., Lee E. Y. H. P., Lee W. H. Suppression of the neoplastic phenotype by replacement of the RB gene in human cancer cells. Science (Washington DC), 242: 1563-1566, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Ligget W. H. J., Dewell D. A., Rocco J., Ahrendt S. A., Koch W., Sidransky D. p16 and p16β are potent growth suppressors of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells in vitro. Cancer Res., 56: 4119-4123, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Mattheakis L. C., Sor F., Collier R. J. Diphthamide synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: structure of the DPH2 gene. Gene, 132: 149-154, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Schultz D. C., Balasara B. R., Testa J. R., Godwin A. K. Cloning and localization of the human diphthamide biosynthesis protein-2 gene, hDPH2. Genomics, 52: 186-191, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Choi Y. H., Lee S. J., Nguyen P. M., Jang J. S., Lee J., Wu M. L., Takano E., Maki M., Henkart P. A., Trepel J. B. Regulation of cyclin D1 by calpain protease. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 28479-28484, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    Sherr C. J. D-type cyclins. Trends Biochem. Sci., 20: 187-190, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Motokura T., Arnold A. Cyclin D and oncogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 3: 5-10, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Masciullo V., Scambia G., Marone M., Giannitelli C., Ferrandina G., Bellacosa A., Benedetti P., Mancuso S. Altered expression of cyclin D1 and CDK4 genes in ovarian carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer, 74: 390-395, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Welker M., Lukas J., Strauss M., Bartek J. Enhanced protein stability: a novel mechanism of D-type cyclin over-abundance identified in human sarcoma cells. Oncogene, 13: 419-425, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    Knudson A. G. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 68: 820-823, 1971.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Fero M. L., Randel E., Gurley K. E., Roberts J. M., Kemp C. J. The murine gene p27 Kip1 is haplo-insufficient for tumour suppression. Nature (Lond.), 396: 177-180, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Di Cristofano A., Pesce B., Cordon-Cardo C., Pandolfi P. P. Pten is essential for embryonic development and tumour suppression. Nat. Genet., 19: 348-355, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Yang R. M., Naitoh J., Murphy M., Wang H. J., Phillipson J., deKernion J. B., Loda M., Reiter R. E. Low p27 expression predicts poor disease-free survival in patients with prostate cancer. J. Urol., 159: 941-945, 1988.
  67. ↵
    Yasui W., Kudo Y., Semba S., Yokozaki H., Tahara E. Reduced expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 is associated with advanced stage and invasiveness of gastric carcinomas. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 88: 625-629, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Esposito V., Baldi A., De Luca A., Groger A. M., Loda M., Giordano G. G., Caputi M., Baldi F., Pagano M., Giordano A. Prognostic role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res., 57: 3381-3385, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    Loda M., Cukor B., Tam S. W., Lavin P., Fiorentino M., Draetta G. F., Jessup J. M., Pagano M. Increased proteasome-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in aggressive colorectal carcinomas. Nat. Med., 3: 231-234, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Porter P. L., Malone K. E., Heagerty P. J., Alexander G. M., Gatti L. A., Firpo E. J., Daling J. R., Roberts J. M. Expression of cell-cycle regulators p27Kip1 and cyclin E, alone and in combination, correlate with survival in young breast cancer patients. Nat. Med., 3: 222-225, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Spirin K. S., Simpson J. F., Takeuchi S., Kawamata N., Miller C. W., Koeffler H. P. p27/Kip1 mutation found in breast cancer. Cancer Res., 56: 2400-2404, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Kawamata N., Morosetti R., Miller C. W., Park D., Spirin K. S., Nakamaki T., Takeuchi S., Hatta Y., Simpson J., Wilcyznski S., et al Molecular analysis of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene p27/Kip1 in human malignancies. Cancer Res., 55: 2266-2269, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    Morosetti R., Kawamata N., Gombart A. F., Miller C. W., Hatta Y., Hirama T., Said J. W., Tomonaga M., Koeffler H. P. Alterations of the p27KIP1 gene in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood, 86: 1924-1930, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    Pietenpol J. A., Bohlander S. K., Sato Y., Papadopoulos N., Liu B., Friedman C., Trask B. J., Roberts J. M., Kinzler K. W., Rowley J. D., Vogelstein B. Assignment of the human p27Kip1 gene to 12p13 and its analysis in leukemias. Cancer Res., 55: 1206-1210, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    Li J., Yen C., Liaw D., Podsypanina K., Bose S., Wang S. I., Puc J., Miliaresis C., Rodgers L., McCombie R., Bigner S. H., Giovanella B. C., Ittmann M., Tycko B., Hibshoosh H., Wigler M. H., Parsons R. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science (Washington DC), 275: 1943-1947, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    Steck P. A., Pershouse M. A., Jasser S. A., Yung W. K., Lin H., Ligon A. H., Langford L. A., Baumgard M. L., Hattier T., Davis T., Frye C., Hu R., Swedlund B., Teng D. H., Tavtigian S. V. Identification of a candidate tumour suppressor gene, MMAC1, at chromosome 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple advanced cancers. Nat. Genet., 15: 356-362, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    Guldberg P., thor Straten P., Birck A., Ahrenkiel V., Kirkin A. F., Zeuthen J. Disruption of the MMAC1/PTEN gene by deletion or mutation is a frequent event in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res., 57: 3660-3663, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    Liaw D., Marsh D. J., Li J., Dahia P. L., Wang S. I., Zheng Z., Bose S., Call K. M., Tsou H. C., Peacocke M., Eng C., Parsons R. Germline mutations of the PTEN gene in Cowden disease, an inherited breast and thyroid cancer syndrome. Nat. Genet., 16: 64-67, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Marsh D. J., Coulon V., Lunetta K. L., Rocca-Serra P., Dahia P. L. M., Zheng Z., Liaw D., Caron S., Duboue B., Lin A. Y., Richardson A-L., Bonnetblanc J-M., Bressieux J-M., Cabarrot-Moreau A., Chompret A., Demange L., Eeles R. A., Yahanda A. M., Fearon E. R., Fricker J-P., Gorlin R. J., Hodgson S. V., Huson S., Lacombe D., LePrat F., Odent S., Toulouse C., Olopade O. I., Sobol H., Tishler S., Woods C. G., Robinson B. G., Weber H. C., Parsons R., Peacocke M., Longy M., Eng C. Mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype analyses in Cowden disease and Bannayan-Zonana syndrome, two hamartoma syndromes with germline PTEN mutation. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7: 507-515, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    Nelen M. R., van Staveren W. C., Peeters E. A., Hassel M. B., Gorlin R. J., Hamm H., Lindboe C. F., Fryns J. P., Sijmons R. H., Woods D. G., Mariman E. C., Padberg G. W., Kremer H. Germline mutations in the PTEN/MMAC1 gene in patients with Cowden disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6: 1383-1387, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
October 1999
Volume 59, Issue 19
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expression of OVCA1, a Candidate Tumor Suppressor, Is Reduced in Tumors and Inhibits Growth of Ovarian Cancer Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expression of OVCA1, a Candidate Tumor Suppressor, Is Reduced in Tumors and Inhibits Growth of Ovarian Cancer Cells
Wendy Bruening, Amanda H. Prowse, David C. Schultz, Marina Holgado-Madruga, Albert Wong and Andrew K. Godwin
Cancer Res October 1 1999 (59) (19) 4973-4983;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Expression of OVCA1, a Candidate Tumor Suppressor, Is Reduced in Tumors and Inhibits Growth of Ovarian Cancer Cells
Wendy Bruening, Amanda H. Prowse, David C. Schultz, Marina Holgado-Madruga, Albert Wong and Andrew K. Godwin
Cancer Res October 1 1999 (59) (19) 4973-4983;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Susceptibility to Aflatoxin B1-related Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mice and Humans
  • Identification of 5-fluorouracil-inducible Target Genes Using cDNA Microarray Profiling
  • Genome-wide Analysis of Gene Expression Associated with MYCN in Human Neuroblastoma
Show more Molecular Biology and Genetics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement