Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Experimental Therapeutics

Extensive Contribution of the Multidrug Transporters P-Glycoprotein and Mrp1 to Basal Drug Resistance

John D. Allen, Remco F. Brinkhuis, Liesbeth van Deemter, Jan Wijnholds and Alfred H. Schinkel
John D. Allen
Divisions of Experimental Therapy [J. D. A., R. F. B., A. H. S.] and Molecular Biology [L. v. D., J. W.], The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Remco F. Brinkhuis
Divisions of Experimental Therapy [J. D. A., R. F. B., A. H. S.] and Molecular Biology [L. v. D., J. W.], The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liesbeth van Deemter
Divisions of Experimental Therapy [J. D. A., R. F. B., A. H. S.] and Molecular Biology [L. v. D., J. W.], The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Wijnholds
Divisions of Experimental Therapy [J. D. A., R. F. B., A. H. S.] and Molecular Biology [L. v. D., J. W.], The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfred H. Schinkel
Divisions of Experimental Therapy [J. D. A., R. F. B., A. H. S.] and Molecular Biology [L. v. D., J. W.], The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published October 2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Despite accumulating evidence that multidrug resistance transporter proteins play a part in drug resistance in some clinical cancers, it remains unclear whether the relatively low levels of multidrug resistance transporter expression found in most untreated tumors could substantially affect their basal sensitivity to antineoplastic drugs. To shed light on this problem, the drug sensitivities of wild-type mouse cell lines were compared with those of lines in which the Mdr1a and Mdr1b genes encoding P-glycoprotein (P-gp) were inactivated and lines in which the Mrp1 gene was inactivated in addition to Mdr1a and Mdr1b. These models permit a clean dissection of the contribution of each transporter to drug resistance at expression levels similar to those in normal tissues and avoid complications that might arise from previous exposure of cell lines to drug selection. For substrate drugs, we found that these contributions can indeed be very substantial. Lines lacking functional P-gp were, on average, markedly more sensitive to paclitaxel (16-fold), anthracyclines (4-fold) and Vinca alkaloids (3-fold). Lines lacking both P-gp and Mrp1 were (compared with wild-type lines) hypersensitive to an even broader array of drugs, including epipodophyllotoxins (4–7-fold), anthracyclines (6–7-fold), camptothecins (3-fold), arsenite (4-fold) and Vinca alkaloids, especially vincristine (28-fold). Thus, even very low levels of P-gp and Mrp1 expression that may be difficult to detect in tumors could significantly affect their innate sensitivity to a wide range of clinically important substrate drugs. An implication is that the use of resistance reversal agents to sensitize drug-naive tumors may be appropriate in more cases than is presently appreciated.

INTRODUCTION

The usual modus operandi for identifying mechanisms of resistance to antineoplastic drugs has been to select cell lines for high levels of drug resistance and then analyze changes in gene expression that might account for the resistance. A consequence of this strategy is that only changes able to confer high levels of resistance are likely to be detected. These include elevated expression of drug efflux pumps or metabolizing enzymes and mutations and/or changes in expression of genes encoding the targets of drug action. The genes encoding the efflux pumps P-gp 3 ,(1, 2, 3) , the MRP1 (4) and BCRP/MXR/ABCP (5, 6, 7) were all identified in this manner.

A reasonable criticism of this approach is that high levels of drug resistance are atypical of clinical tumors. Chemotherapy is usually a marginal proposition in the sense that the maximum dose tolerated by the patient is often barely sufficient to kill a useful percentage of the tumor cells. Relatively small increases in drug resistance in tumor cells are thus sufficient to render the drug ineffective. Such small increases may be achieved by a much wider variety of mechanisms than those able to confer high levels of drug resistance. The relevance of the (elevated) drug transporter expression seen in drug-selected cell lines to clinical drug resistance cannot, therefore, be taken for granted.

A growing body of evidence links P-gp expression in untreated tumors to poor prognosis for chemotherapy with substrate drugs (for instance, see Refs. 8 ,, 9 ). The connection is firm for several hematological cancers but, thus far, remains tentative for most other malignancies. Part of the reason is that reliable quantitation of gene expression in heterogeneous patient material is technically problematic (e.g., see the meta-analysis of P-gp expression in breast cancer in Ref. 10 ). Data concerning the contribution of MRP1 to clinical drug resistance are still sparse (8 , 9 , 11) , and the issue is complicated by the widespread expression of MRP1 in normal tissues. In general, it is still unclear whether the (often low) basal levels of multidrug transporter expression significantly affect the innate drug sensitivity of most types of tumors.

We have therefore tested the effects of eliminating normal (i.e., not drug-selected) P-gp and Mrp1 expression on drug sensitivity by comparing mouse cell lines carrying either functional or targeted null alleles of the genes encoding these transporters. This model circumvents issues surrounding the heterogeneity of gene expression in tumor cells and permits a direct assessment of the contribution of multidrug transporters to basal drug sensitivity at levels of expression that can be more readily related to those in normal tissues or untreated tumors. We found that these contributions can be very substantial for drugs that are transporter substrates, implying that basal expression of multidrug transporters could substantially affect innate drug sensitivity of clinical tumors and that even small increases (in absolute terms) in their expression may well mediate acquired resistance. The remarkable sensitivity of cell lines lacking both P-gp and Mrp1 to antineoplastic drugs also makes them valuable in other contexts as tools for analysis of drug resistance mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fibroblast Cell Lines.

Most of the cell lines used in this study were derived by us from MEFs by 3T3-like procedures (12) . The source embryos were of mixed genetic background (F5 or later crosses between 129/Ola and FVB strains). Lines lacking functional P-gp were obtained from Mdr1a−/−1b−/− embryos (13) , and lines lacking both P-gp and Mrp1 were obtained from Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/− embryos (14) . The MEF cultures went through crises at variable passage numbers and were cloned between passages 25 and 40, as allowed by their growth characteristics. NIH/3T3 cells (15) , passage 126, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA; CRL 1658). Note that this passage is no longer strongly contact inhibited, growing to approximately six times the density originally reported. All lines and MEF cultures were maintained in DMEM plus 10% FCS (Life Technologies, Breda, The Netherlands) and were passaged by treatment with trypsin-EDTA. Mean volumes of log phase cells were measured with a pore resistance counter (Casy; Schärfe System, Reutlingen, Germany). Single-cell cloning efficiencies were determined by 7-day colony assays stained with crystal violet.

P-gp and Mrp1 Protein Levels.

Total tissue and cell lysates for immunoblots were prepared by homogenizing and sonicating cells at 107/ml or tissues at 50 mg wet weight/ml in 10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mm KCl, 1.5 mm MgCl2, 1% w/v SDS, 1% v/v 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Samples were mixed with SDS-PAGE loading buffer and heated to 65°C for 5 min, this being adequate to dissociate immunoglobulins in the tissue samples without causing significant aggregation of either P-gp or Mrp1. Samples were analyzed on 8% SDS-PAGE gels and electroblotted to nitrocellulose. Blots were divided at the 97-kDa marker. The high molecular weight halves were probed for either P-gp or Mrp1 using the C219 (Centocor, Leiden, The Netherlands) or MRPr1 (16) monoclonal antibodies, respectively. These antibodies were raised against the human and Chinese hamster proteins but cross-react with the mouse homologues. The low molecular weight halves of the blots were probed with the anti-α-tubulin monoclonal YL 1/2 (17) as a loading control. Target proteins were visualized with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL). Replicate blots of total RNA from the cell lines and mouse tissues were hybridized with 32P-labeled antisense RNA probes for Bcrp1 (18) or Mdr2 (19) or random-primed DNA probes for Spgp (IMAGE clone 313236, GenBank accession number W11894) or Cyp3a16 (a complete coding sequence amplified by PCR from liver cDNA, kindly provided by J. W. Smit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute). Hybridization was performed in Ultrahyb buffer (Ambion, Austin, TX) under the recommended conditions, except for Cyp3a16, for which the hybridization and wash temperatures were reduced by 5°C to ensure detection of other homologous Cyp3a mRNAs. One blot was rehybridized with a cDNA probe for the mouse 18S rRNA as a loading control.

Drugs.

Paclitaxel, vinblastine sulfate, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), cytarabine, melphalan, and sodium arsenite were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). Formulations of vincristine sulfate, cisplatin, daunorubicin, mitoxantrone, etoposide, and teniposide were obtained from local pharmaceutical suppliers; the topotecan formulation was from SmithKline Beecham (Brentford, Middlesex, England); and Taxotere (docetaxel) and SN-38 were from Rhône-Poulenc Rorer (Vitry-Alfortville, France).

Drug Sensitivity Assays.

Growth inhibition (IC50) assays were performed by seeding 200 cells per well in 96-well plates in complete medium and, after cell attachment, applying drugs in a dilution series of 2-fold concentration steps, with each concentration in quadruplicate wells. After 4–4.5 days, when control wells were still subconfluent, cells were lysed in situ, and nucleic acids were stained with a proprietary dye (Cyquant; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and quantified by fluorescence (485 nm excitation, 530 nm emission).

Descriptive and Inferential Statistics.

The SDs shown in Table 2 ⇓ represent variability in absolute IC50 determinations across independent experiments. Sensitivity factors in Table 3 ⇓ are computed directly from the means shown in Table 2 ⇓ . Because distributions of drug resistance data are, by nature, positively skewed, IC50 values were transformed to logarithms for the purpose of statistical comparisons (20) . All tests were two-tailed t tests assuming unequal variances.

RESULTS

Derivation and Characteristics of Fibroblast Cell Lines.

Mouse cell lines of three genotypes were generated and compared: wild-type, P-gp knockout (Mdr1a−/−1b−/−), and combined P-gp-Mrp1 knockout (Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/−). The lines were obtained by spontaneous immortalization of MEFs (see“ Materials and Methods” for details). Their genetic background is a mix of 129/Ola and FVB strains, except for the NIH/3T3 line included for comparison, which was derived from an NIH/Swiss strain embryo (15) . The MEF lines to be analyzed were chosen from a larger set on the basis of favorable growth characteristics—stability, vigorous growth to high density, and single-cell cloning efficiency—but differ somewhat in these respects (Table 1) ⇓ . Although growth properties might be expected to affect drug sensitivity, in practice no systematic effects from this source were observed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Growth characteristics of the fibroblast cell lines

Passages are numbered from single cell cloning. Cells used in this study were within four passages of the number shown. Cell lines at early passage numbers (5C.31 and MEF3.8) were retested for drug sensitivity after 15–20 additional passages. No decrease in sensitivity was observed.

Expression of Multidrug Transporters in the Cell Lines and Mouse Tissues.

The wild-type cell lines are useful as models of innate drug sensitivity provided their expression of P-gp and Mrp1 is not substantially greater than that seen in normal tissues. P-gp and Mrp1 levels in wild-type and knockout cell lines and a panel of mouse whole tissue homogenates were therefore compared by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 1, A and B) ⇓ . P-gp levels in the wild-type cell lines were comparable with or lower than those seen in normal mouse tissues. The C219 antibody cross-reacts with Mdr2 P-gp (homologue of human MDR3) and Spgp, but their expression is mostly confined to liver (21 , 22) . Two observations exclude significant levels of either of these proteins in the fibroblast cell lines: Mdr2 and Spgp mRNAs were undetectable by Northern analysis of the cell lines but readily detectable in mouse liver (Fig. 2,A and B) ⇓ , and the C219 antibody detected no Mdr2 or Spgp protein in the six fibroblast lines null for Mdr1a/1b (Fig. 1A) ⇓ . Thus, the C219 signal in the wild-type cell lines reliably reflects their expression of P-gp.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Immunoblot analysis of P-glycoprotein (A) and Mrp1 (B) levels in mouse embryonic fibroblast lines versus normal mouse tissues. Fibroblast lines were grouped by genotype as shown. Each lane contained 30μ g of protein from total cell or tissue lysates. Pairs of PAGE gels were run together, blotted, probed, washed, treated with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents, and exposed together. The NIH/3T3 sample was included on both blots to ensure equivalence, although the lane was partially truncated on the right blot during transfer. The high molecular mass halves of the blots were probed with the anti-P-gp monoclonal antibody C219 or the anti-MRP1 monoclonal antibody MRPr1. C219 also detects mouse Mdr2 and Spgp proteins, present in some tissues but not in the cell lines (see “Results”). The higher molecular mass band (∼200 kDa) observed in some tissues in A is aggregated P-gp. The variable migration of P-gp and multiple Mrp1 bands arises from differences in glycosylation. The bottom halves of the blots were probed with a monoclonal antibody directed against α-tubulin (C) as a loading control; this is reliable for the fibroblast lines, but some variation in relative expression of tubulins should be expected for the tissues. Markers on the left are in kilodaltons.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Northern analysis of Mdr2 (A), Spgp (B), Cyp3a (C), and Bcrp1 (D) expression in the fibroblast cell lines. Probes for these mRNAs were hybridized to replicate blots containing 10 μg of total RNA/lane. One blot was subsequently rehybridized with an 18S rRNA cDNA probe as a loading control (E).

The substrate specificity of the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450–3A family of enzymes overlaps that of P-gp; therefore, differences in their activity between different cell lines could, in principle, affect drug sensitivity. However, Northern analysis of the fibroblast lines with a Cyp3a16 probe at reduced stringency to recognize the major Cyp3a mRNAs did not reveal detectable expression in any of the lines, whereas a strong signal was observed in liver and intestine, as expected (Fig. 2C) ⇓ .

Mrp1 levels in the cell lines were somewhat higher than in most tissues examined. This result is adequate for the present purpose, given that Mrp1 tends to be concentrated in epithelial layers having substantially higher protein levels than the tissue taken as a whole (23, 24, 25) . This also holds true for P-gp (26) .

Sensitivity of the Lines to Antineoplastic Drugs.

The relative sensitivities of the cell lines to an extensive panel of antineoplastic drugs were determined by growth inhibition assay (Table 2) ⇓ . The drug panel contained representatives from the major families of clinically important antineoplastic agents that are known substrates for P-gp or Mrp1, including taxanes, Vinca alkaloids, anthracyclines, epipodophyllotoxins, and camptothecin derivatives, as well as an arsenical. Control drugs were also included from several classes that are poor or insignificant substrates of these proteins but for which acquired resistance is also a significant clinical problem: cisplatin, cytarabine (a nucleoside analogue), and melphalan (an alkylating agent). Mitoxantrone was included because it is an excellent substrate for the recently identified multidrug transporter BCRP/Bcrp1 (5 , 6 , 18) .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Sensitivity of wild-type and knockout fibroblast cell lines to antineoplastic drugs, by genotype

Shown are the mean IC50 (nanomolar) ±SD and the number of contributing assays (in parentheses). For consistency, where n = 2 the variability is also shown as ±SD, although in these cases the actual range observed is always smaller.

The data show that basal expression of P-gp and Mrp1 can have a major impact on innate resistance to substrate drugs. Table 2 ⇓ presents the mean IC50 values, and Table 3 ⇓ , to aid comparisons, shows the sensitivity factors plus results of statistical tests of the differences between genotypes. The Mdr1a−/−1b−/− cell lines were substantially more sensitive than the wild-type lines to all drugs tested that are good P-gp substrates—the taxanes, anthracyclines, and Vinca alkaloids. The differences were surprisingly large given the relatively low levels of P-gp in the wild-type cell lines; the averages were 16-fold for paclitaxel, 4–5-fold for the anthracyclines, and ∼3-fold for Vinca alkaloids. It may be noted that the cell lines lacking P-gp expressed somewhat higher levels of Mrp1 than the wild-type lines (Fig. 1) ⇓ . It is not clear whether this is a coincidental or a compensatory effect. Either way, it might partially mask the effect of inactivating P-gp for drugs that are substrates of both transporters, Vinca alkaloids, epipodophyllotoxins, and possibly anthracyclines (see below).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Drug sensitivity factors of knockout versus wild-type fibroblast cell lines

Sensitivity factors are calculated from the IC50s shown in Table 2 ⇓ by comparison with the average IC50 of the wild-type lines for each drug. Shown are sensitivity factors for the average of all lines in the genotype and (in parentheses) the range of sensitivity factors obtained for individual lines. Results of t tests comparing the IC50s of adjacent genotypes are shown as:** P < 0.01; *P < 0.05, two-tailed. The last column shows test results for the comparison of Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/− and wild-type lines.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2A

Continued

The Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/− cell lines were markedly more sensitive than the Mdr1a−/−1b−/− cell lines to several Mrp1 substrate drugs, most notably vincristine (>10-fold), sodium arsenite (∼7-fold), and the epipodophyllotoxins etoposide (7-fold) and teniposide (4-fold). Qualitatively, these differences in drug sensitivity are in agreement with those seen in previous studies of mouse embryonic stem cell lines and bone marrow mast cells in which only the Mrp1 gene had been inactivated by gene targeting (27 , 28) . However, the differences we observed are generally greater due, at least in part, to the absence of masking P-gp activity on drugs that are common substrates. For such drugs, the combined effect of eliminating the function of two transporters can sometimes be very striking, as exemplified by vincristine, for which the difference in sensitivity between Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/− and wild-type lines averaged 28-fold.

Human MRP1 transports anthracyclines effectively and can confer resistance to these drugs, but it is unclear to what extent mouse Mrp1 does likewise (28, 29, 30, 31, 32) . We found that mouse fibroblast lines lacking both Mrp1 and P-gp were only slightly more sensitive to doxorubicin and daunorubicin than lines lacking only P-gp (∼1.5-fold), suggesting that these drugs are relatively poor substrates for mouse Mrp1.

It is interesting that the Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/− cell lines were 2–3-fold more sensitive to the camptothecin derivatives topotecan and SN-38 than the Mdr1a−/−1b−/− lines. This result suggests that mouse Mrp1 can transport these drugs, in line with a recent report (33) that elevated expression of human MRP1 in drug-selected or MRP1-transfected cells mediates resistance to SN-38 and CPT-11 (another camptothecin derivative), which is associated with ATP-dependent drug efflux and reversed by MRP1 inhibitors.

Overexpression of P-gp is usually associated with only modest resistance to mitoxantrone (e.g., Refs. 34 ,, 35 ), implying that this drug is a relatively poor substrate. Increases in resistance to mitoxantrone have also been observed in MRP1-transfected cells (11) . In line with these results, we did observe moderately increased sensitivity to mitoxantrone in Mdr1a−/−1b−/− and Mdr1a−/−1b−/−Mrp1−/− fibroblast lines of 2.5- and 4.3-fold, respectively, compared with wild-type lines, but only the latter difference was statistically significant (P = 0.041, two tailed). This is in part due to the considerable variability in resistance to mitoxantrone between different cell lines within each genotype. Mitoxantrone is a good substrate of the BCRP/Bcrp1 transporter (5 , 6 , 18) , and there is indeed a qualitative correlation between Bcrp1 mRNA levels (Fig. 2D) ⇓ and resistance to mitoxantrone. However, the relationship is not so good that Bcrp1 expression might account for all of the differences in sensitivity to this drug.

Within genotypes, substantial systematic differences in drug sensitivity were evident only in the wild-type group of cell lines; the WT1.2 and especially the NIH/3T3 lines were frequently more sensitive than the 2ac.1 and 2ac.2 lines. This pattern was most pronounced for P-gp substrate drugs and was not observed consistently for drugs that are neither P-gp nor Mrp1 substrates (cisplatin, cytarabine, and melphalan). The systematic differences are thus probably at least partly the result of the lower P-gp expression observed in the WT1.2 and NIH/3T3 lines (Fig. 1) ⇓ . The different mouse strain origin of the NIH/3T3 line might also contribute to the differences observed.

DISCUSSION

Our data show clearly that P-gp and Mrp1 can be major determinants of innate drug sensitivity, even when the level of expression is low. Fibroblast cell lines lacking P-gp were consistently and often markedly more sensitive than wild-type lines to substrate drugs, including taxanes, anthracyclines, and Vinca alkaloids. Lines also lacking Mrp1 were more sensitive still to anthracyclines and Vinca alkaloids (with extreme sensitivity to vincristine) and considerably more sensitive than wild-type lines to epipodophyllotoxins, camptothecin derivatives, and arsenite. No such increased sensitivity was seen for drugs that are not substrates of either of the transporters. The extent of the differences is remarkable in that the levels of P-gp and Mrp1 in the wild-type fibroblast cell lines were similar to or lower than those seen in many normal, bulk tissues. In addition to showing the effects of (genetically) eliminating P-gp function on the basal sensitivity of cells to antineoplastic drugs, the results demonstrate the contribution of Mrp1 to basal resistance in the absence of the potentially confounding influence of P-gp, extending previous results obtained with Mrp1−/− embryonic stem cells and mast cells (27 , 28) .

Although many other mechanisms may intrude to alter drug resistance, there can be little doubt that the increased sensitivities seen in the knockout fibroblast lines are due to the loss of P-gp and Mrp1. Multiple independently derived lines of each genotype were examined, with similar origins and genetic background. Results for the cell lines of each genotype are in good agreement, and the pattern of drug sensitivities observed matches the known substrate specificities of the two transporter proteins.

These observations strongly support the position that the normal levels of expression of MDR transporters in cancer (or normal) cells can be important for innate resistance to antineoplastic drugs. They also imply that low absolute levels of expression of drug transporters in tumors can still be significant for acquired resistance, in that a change to low expression from very low (or no) initial expression could produce a difference in drug sensitivity of the same scale as observed in the cell line model. Although our results concern P-gp and Mrp1, there is no obvious reason to suspect that other drug transporters, such as Bcrp1, will differ in this respect. In “Introduction” we alluded to attempts to predict the responses of primary tumors to specific chemotherapeutic regimens on the basis of P-gp expression, which have been generally disappointing. Our data suggest that such failures are not reason to conclude that P-gp (or Mrp1) is irrelevant to clinical drug resistance but rather that the task of assessing expression of these (and other) drug transporters, although difficult, is worthwhile. It seems clear that simultaneous assessment of expression of multiple transporters of a given drug will be beneficial.

The relevance of basal expression of MDR transporters to chemotherapy will be increased with the adoption of potent inhibitors of P-gp such as Valspodar (and, ultimately, inhibitors of other transporters) for coadministration during chemotherapy, now being tested in Phase III clinical trials (e.g., see Ref. 9 ). Our results lend credence to the idea that inhibitors of MDR transporters may be useful not only to reverse or prevent acquired drug resistance but also to sensitize drug-naive, untreated tumors to substrate drugs, even when expression of the relevant transporter(s) is low. A caveat to these approaches is that coadministration of inhibitors with antineoplastic drugs might increase the risk of toxic side effects in normal cells that are otherwise protected by drug transporter expression (14 , 25 , 36) . The importance of such side effects can only be decided in the clinical trials.

It must be reiterated that we are not suggesting that P-gp, Mrp1, or other drug transporters are the only important influences on basal resistance in our cell lines, let alone in clinical tumors. The influence of other, unknown factors is evident in the data, for example, in the marked sensitivity of NIH/3T3 cells to arsenite and the variability in mitoxantrone sensitivity, only part of which is attributable to Bcrp1 expression. This is not surprising, given that drug sensitivity may be influenced by many factors. (In fact, the cell lines lacking P-gp and Mrp1 function will be useful tools for investigating these other factors.) Other cell types, including tumor cells, may have a more extensive repertoire of drug resistance mechanisms than fibroblasts. If so, the relative contribution of P-gp and Mrp1 to drug resistance in tumors or normal cells thus may (or may not) be less than is suggested by our results. Nevertheless, acknowledging the limitations of the cell line model, our data indicate that this contribution can be very marked.

Acknowledgments

Preliminary work on this study was performed by A. H. S. in the laboratory of Michael Gottesman (Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD). We thank Rhône-Poulenc Rorer for SN-38, kindly supplied by J. H. M. Schellens. Thanks also to J. W. Smit for the Cyp3a16 probe. Valuable guidance on statistical analysis was provided by A. A. M. Hart. Helpful comments on the manuscript were provided by P. Borst, J. W. Smit, J. W. Jonker, and M. T. Huisman.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported by Dutch Cancer Society Grants NKI 95-963 and NKI 97-1433.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Experimental Therapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: (31) 20-512-2046; Fax: (31) 20-512-2050; E-mail: alfred{at}nki.nl

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: P-gp, P-glycoprotein; BCRP, breast cancer resistance protein; MDR, multidrug resistance; MRP, multidrug resistance-associated protein; MEF, mouse embryo fibroblast; SN-38, (4S)-11-ethylcamptothecin-ol; Spgp, sister of P-gp.

  • Received February 21, 2000.
  • Accepted August 17, 2000.
  • ©2000 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Juliano, R. L., and Ling, V. A surface glycoprotein modulating drug permeability in Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 455: 152–162, 1976.
  2. ↵
    Chen C. J., Chin J. E., Ueda K., Clark D. P., Pastan I., Gottesman M. M., Roninson I. B. Internal duplication and homology with bacterial transport proteins in the mdr1 (P-glycoprotein) gene from multidrug-resistant human cells. Cell, 47: 381-389, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Gros P., Croop J., Housman D. Mammalian multidrug resistance gene: complete cDNA sequence indicates strong homology to bacterial transport proteins. Cell, 47: 371-380, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Cole S. P., Bhardwaj G., Gerlach J. H., Mackie J. E., Grant C. E., Almquist K. C., Stewart A. J., Kurz E. U., Duncan A. M., Deeley R. G. Overexpression of a transporter gene in a multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line. Science (Washington DC), 258: 1650-1654, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Doyle L. A., Yang W., Abruzzo L. V., Krogmann T., Gao Y., Rishi A. K., Ross D. D. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 15665-15670, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Miyake K., Mickley L., Litman T., Zhan Z., Robey R., Cristensen B., Brangi M., Greenberger L., Dean M., Fojo T., Bates S. E. Molecular cloning of cDNAs which are highly overexpressed in mitoxantrone-resistant cells: demonstration of homology to ABC transport genes. Cancer Res., 59: 8-13, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Allikmets R., Schriml L. M., Hutchinson A., Romano-Spica V., Dean M. A human placenta-specific ATP-binding cassette gene (ABCP) on chromosome 4q22 that is involved in multidrug resistance. Cancer Res., 58: 5337-5339, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Ramachandran C., Melnick S. J. Multidrug resistance in human tumors—molecular diagnosis and clinical significance. Mol. Diagn., 4: 81-94, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Sikic B. I. Modulation of multidrug resistance: a paradigm for translational clinical research. Oncology (Huntington), 13: 183-187, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Trock B. J., Leonessa F., Clarke R. Multidrug resistance in breast cancer: a meta-analysis of MDR1/gp170 expression and its possible functional significance (see comments). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 89: 917-931, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Borst P., Evers R., Kool M., Wijnholds J. A family of drug transporters, the MRPs. J Natl. Cancer. Inst., 92: 1295-1302, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Todaro G. J., Green H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established cell lines. J. Cell Biol., 17: 299-313, 1963.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Schinkel A. H., Mayer U., Wagenaar E., Mol C. A. A. M., van Deemter L., Smit J. J., van der Valk M. A., Voordouw A. C., Spits H., van Tellingen O., Zijlmans J. M., Fibbe W. E., Borst P. Normal viability and altered pharmacokinetics in mice lacking mdr1-type (drug-transporting) P-glycoproteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 4028-4033, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Wijnholds J., deLange E. C., Scheffer G. L., van den Berg D. J., Mol C. A., van der Valk M., Schinkel A. H., Scheper R. J., Breimer D. D., Borst P. Multidrug resistance protein 1 protects the choroid plexus epithelium and contributes to the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. J. Clin. Invest., 105: 279-285, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Jainchill J. L., Aaronson S. A., Todaro G. J. Murine sarcoma and leukemia viruses: assay using clonal lines of contact-inhibited mouse cells. J. Virol., 4: 549-553, 1969.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Flens M. J., Izquierdo M. A., Scheffer G. L., Fritz J. M., Meijer C. J., Scheper R. J., Zaman G. J. Immunochemical detection of the multidrug resistance-associated protein MRP in human multidrug-resistant tumor cells by monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res., 54: 4557-4563, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Kilmartin J. V., Wright B., Milstein C. Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J. Cell Biol., 93: 576-582, 1982.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Allen J. D., Brinkhuis R. F., Wijnholds J., Schinkel A. H. The mouse Bcrp1/Mxr/Abcp gene: amplification and overexpression in cell lines selected for resistance to topotecan, mitoxantrone, or doxorubicin. Cancer Res., 59: 4237-4241, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Gros P., Raymond M., Bell J., Housman D. Cloning and characterization of a second member of the mouse mdr gene family. Mol. Cell Biol., 8: 2770-2778, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Altman, D. G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
  21. ↵
    Childs S., Yeh R. L., Georges E., Ling V. Identification of a sister gene to P-glycoprotein. Cancer Res., 55: 2029-2034, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Croop J. M., Raymond M., Haber D., Devault A., Arceci R. J., Gros P., Housman D. E. The three mouse multidrug resistance (mdr) genes are expressed in a tissue-specific manner in normal mouse tissues. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9: 1346-1350, 1989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Flens M. J., Zaman G. J., van der Valk P., Izquierdo M. A., Schroeijers A. B., Scheffer G. L., van der Groep P., de Haas M., Meijer C. J., Scheper R. J. Tissue distribution of the multidrug resistance protein. Am. J. Pathol., 148: 1237-1247, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Stride B. D., Valdimarsson G., Gerlach J. H., Wilson G. M., Cole S. P., Deeley R. G. Structure and expression of the messenger RNA encoding the murine multidrug resistance protein, an ATP-binding cassette transporter. Mol. Pharmacol., 49: 962-971, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    Wijnholds J., Scheffer G. L., van der Valk M., van der Valk P., Beijnen J. H., Scheper R. J., Borst P. Multidrug resistance protein 1 protects the oropharyngeal mucosal layer and the testicular tubules against drug-induced damage. J. Exp. Med., 188: 797-808, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Thiebaut F., Tsuruo T., Hamada H., Gottesman M. M., Pastan I., Willingham M. C. Cellular localization of the multidrug-resistance gene product P-glycoprotein in normal human tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 7735-7738, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Wijnholds J., Evers R., van Leusden M. R., Mol C. A. A. M., Zaman G. J., Mayer U., Beijnen J. H., van der Valk M., Krimpenfort P., Borst P. Increased sensitivity to anticancer drugs and decreased inflammatory response in mice lacking the multidrug resistance-associated protein. Nat. Med., 3: 1275-1279, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Lorico A., Rappa G., Flavell R. A., Sartorelli A. C. Double knockout of the MRP gene leads to increased drug sensitivity in vitro. Cancer Res., 56: 5351-5355, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Lorico A., Rappa G., Finch R. A., Yang D., Flavell R. A., Sartorelli A. C. Disruption of the murine MRP (multidrug resistance protein) gene leads to increased sensitivity to etoposide (VP-16) and increased levels of glutathione. Cancer Res., 57: 5238-5242, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Slapak C. A., Fracasso P. M., Martell R. L., Toppmeyer D. L., Lecerf J. M., Levy S. B. Overexpression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene in vincristine but not doxorubicin-selected multidrug-resistant murine erythroleukemia cells. Cancer Res., 54: 5607-5613, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Slapak C. A., Martell R. L., Terashima M., Levy S. B. Increased efflux of vincristine, but not of daunorubicin, associated with the murine multidrug resistance protein (MRP). Biochem. Pharmacol., 52: 1569-1576, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Stride B. D., Grant C. E., Loe D. W., Hipfner D. R., Cole S. P. C., Deeley R. G. Pharmacological characterization of the murine and human orthologs of multidrug-resistance protein in transfected human embryonic kidney cells. Mol. Pharmacol., 52: 344-353, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Chen Z. S., Furukawa T., Sumizawa T., Ono K., Ueda K., Seto K., Akiyama S. I. ATP-dependent efflux of CPT-11 and SN-38 by the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) and its inhibition by PAK-104P. Mol. Pharmacol., 55: 921-928, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Dalton W. S., Durie B. G., Alberts D. S., Gerlach J. H., Cress A. E. Characterization of a new drug-resistant human myeloma cell line that expresses P-glycoprotein. Cancer Res., 46: 5125-5130, 1986.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Zaman, G. J., and Borst, P. MRP, mode of action and role in MDR. In: S. Gupta and T. Tsuruo (eds.), Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Cells, pp. 95–107, Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
  36. ↵
    Schinkel A. H. The physiological function of drug-transporting P-glycoproteins. Semin. Cancer Biol., 8: 161-170, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
October 2000
Volume 60, Issue 20
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Extensive Contribution of the Multidrug Transporters P-Glycoprotein and Mrp1 to Basal Drug Resistance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Extensive Contribution of the Multidrug Transporters P-Glycoprotein and Mrp1 to Basal Drug Resistance
John D. Allen, Remco F. Brinkhuis, Liesbeth van Deemter, Jan Wijnholds and Alfred H. Schinkel
Cancer Res October 15 2000 (60) (20) 5761-5766;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Extensive Contribution of the Multidrug Transporters P-Glycoprotein and Mrp1 to Basal Drug Resistance
John D. Allen, Remco F. Brinkhuis, Liesbeth van Deemter, Jan Wijnholds and Alfred H. Schinkel
Cancer Res October 15 2000 (60) (20) 5761-5766;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antitumor Effect by Interleukin-11 Receptor α-Locus Chemokine/CCL27, Introduced into Tumor Cells through a Recombinant Adenovirus Vector
  • Mammary Carcinoma Suppression by Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein-II
  • E1A, E1B Double-restricted Adenovirus for Oncolytic Gene Therapy of Gallbladder Cancer
Show more Experimental Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement