Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Experimental Therapeutics

Potentiation of Photodynamic Therapy by Ursodeoxycholic Acid

David Kessel, Joseph A. Caruso and John J. Reiners Jr.
David Kessel
Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine [D. K.], and Institute of Chemical Toxicology, Wayne State University [J. A. C., J. J. R.], Detroit, Michigan 48201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph A. Caruso
Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine [D. K.], and Institute of Chemical Toxicology, Wayne State University [J. A. C., J. J. R.], Detroit, Michigan 48201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John J. Reiners Jr.
Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine [D. K.], and Institute of Chemical Toxicology, Wayne State University [J. A. C., J. J. R.], Detroit, Michigan 48201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published December 2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) protects cells from the apoptotic effects of hydrophobic bile acids and some other cytotoxic agents. We observed the opposite result when assessing the effects of UDCA on the apoptotic response to mitochondrial photodamage induced by photodynamic therapy (PDT). Two photosensitizers with predominantly mitochondrial specificity were used: a porphycene we have designated CPO; and the tin etiopurpurin SnET2. UDCA potentiated the loss of mitochondrial potential, release of cytochrome c into the cytosol, activation of caspase-3, and apoptotic cell death after irradiation of photosensitized murine leukemia L1210 or hepatoma 1c1c7 cells. These effects were not observed when UDCA was added after irradiation. Glyco-UDCA and tauro-UDCA, conjugated forms of UDCA that are formed in vivo, were as effective as UDCA in promoting PDT phototoxicity. Because UDCA does not act by enhancing intracellular accumulation of the photosensitizing agents used in this study, we propose that the mode of action of UDCA involves the sensitization of mitochondrial membranes to photodamage. UDCA is used currently in gastroenterology for several indications. The drug may offer a means for promoting the efficacy of PDT with minimal adverse effects.

INTRODUCTION

PDT 3 involves the preferential photodamage of neoplastic cells and has also been used for treatment of vascular diseases, e.g., atherosclerotic plaque and macular degeneration (1) . Several photosensitizing agents exhibit the required selectivity for pathological versus normal tissues. These agents target a variety of subcellular organelles for photodamage (1) . When mitochondria are the primary target, PDT causes a rapid loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), loss of cytochrome c, and initiation of a prompt apoptotic response (2) . The latter is presumably mediated by activation of the Apaf-1-procaspase-9 pathway, leading to caspase-3 activation (3) .

UDCA resembles its more hydrophobic analogue DCA except for a different configuration of the -OH substituents (Fig. 1) ⇓ . UDCA has been used clinically for the solubilization of gallstones and the treatment of biliary cirrhosis (4 , 5) . A variety of additional properties of the drug have been identified. UDCA has been reported to protect primary hepatocytes and hepatoma, osteogenic sarcoma, and HeLa cells from apoptosis induced by okadaic acid, hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, and DCA (6, 7, 8) . UDCA was shown to reverse the toxic effects of DCA by preventing loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential and release of cytochrome c (9, 10, 11, 12) .

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Structures of DCA and UDCA.

Because of its reported antiapoptotic effects and the results obtained with DCA, we initially thought that UDCA might suppress the apoptotic response to PDT. Instead, we found that UDCA sensitizes mitochondria to photodamage. Because UDCA has been safely used for the treatment of a variety of human conditions, the results described here suggest that UDCA may be a safe and useful agent for the promotion of PDT efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drugs and Chemicals.

Tin etiopurpurin (SnET2; Ref. 13 ) was obtained from Dr. Alan Morgan, University of Louisville. The porphycene CPO (14) was obtained from Dr. Alex Cross (CytoPharm, San Francisco, CA). CPO is a highly selective agent for producing mitochondrial photodamage (2) , whereas SnET2 sensitizes mitochondria more than lysosomes (15) . The sensitizers were dissolved in N,N′-dimethylformamide to yield 1 mm stock solutions. Stock solutions (100 mm) of bile acids (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) were prepared in 0.2 m NaOH. HO342, a probe for chromatin condensation, and MTO, a probe for the mitochondrial membrane potential, were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). DEVD-R110, a fluorogenic substrate for caspase-3, was also provided by Molecular Probes. Ac-DEVD-AMC and a murine antibody to cytochrome c were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA). AMC was purchased from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI).

Cells and Cell Culture.

Murine L1210 cells were maintained in suspension culture. Hepa 1c1c7 cells are an adherent cell line. Both lines were maintained as described by Kessel et al. (16) .

PDT Protocols.

Suspensions of L1210 cells (7 mg/ml wet weight = 2 × 106 cells) were incubated in growth medium containing 2 μm SnET2 or CPO for 15 min at 37°C. The cells were subsequently washed and resuspended in fresh growth medium at room temperature. For Hepa 1c1c7 cells, subconfluent cultures were exposed to 2 μm SnET2 for 20–25 min at 37°C prior to washing. Irradiation was provided by a 600 W quartz-halogen source filtered with 10 cm of water and a 800-nm cutoff filter to remove ionizing radiation. Bandwidth was further confined to 660 ± 10 nm (SnET2) or 610 ± 10 nm (CPO) by narrow-band interference filters (Oriel, Stratfort, CT). The total light dose is specified for each experiment. Initial experiments indicated that a 50% loss of L1210 cell viability was produced by irradiation with 200 mJ/cm 2 using SnET2 or with 270 mJ/cm 2 with CPO. For Hepa 1c1c7 cells, an LD50 dose was achieved by loading cultures with 2μ m SnET2 and irradiating with 45 mJ/cm 2 at 660 nm. Cell suspensions or cultures were supplemented with bile acids either before irradiation, after irradiation, or before and after irradiation as indicated in the text.

Caspase-3 Assays.

Preliminary studies indicated that caspase-3 activation occurred very rapidly after irradiation of photosensitized L1210 cells but considerably slower with 1c1c7 cells. L1210 cells were collected 5 min after irradiation, washed, and lysed in 200 μl of buffer containing 50 mm Tris (pH 7.5), 0.03% NP40, and 1 mm DTT. The lysate was briefly sonicated, and the debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 1 min. The supernatant fluid (100 μl) was mixed with 40μ m DEVD-R110, 10 mm HEPES (pH 7.5), 50 mm NaCl, and 2.5 mm DTT in a total volume of 200 μl. The rate of increase in fluorescence emission, resulting from the release of rhodamine-110 from the fluorogenic substrate, was measured using a fluorescent plate reader at room temperature.

After irradiation, Hepa 1c1c7 cells were maintained for 30–90 min at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 chamber prior to being washed and harvested for caspase-3 analyses. The procedures used for preparation of lysates and the assay of caspase-3 using DEVD-AMC as substrate have been described in detail (17) . Release of AMC was monitored using a fluorescence plate reader.

DEVDase activity in all cases is reported in terms of nmol product/mg protein/min. Control determinations were made on extracts of untreated cells or cells treated with drug vehicle alone. Each assay was performed with quadruplicate samples. The Bio-Rad assay, using BSA as a standard, was used to estimate protein concentrations.

Fluorescence Microscopy.

Apoptotic nuclear morphology was assessed by labeling L1210 cells for 5 min at 37°C with HO342 (2 μg/ml). Nuclei were observed by fluorescence microscopy using 330–380 nm excitation and measuring fluorescence at 420–450 nm. Three fields of 100 cells were scored, and the percentage of cells exhibiting apoptotic morphology was determined. Loss of ΔΨm was measured by incubating cells for 5 min at 37°C in medium containing 300 nm MTO. Fluorescence (580–620 nm) was detected using 510–560 nm excitation.

Viability.

Control and irradiated suspensions of L1210 cells were serially diluted, mixed in soft agar, plated, and cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 chamber. Colonies were counted 5–7 days later. Subconfluent cultures of Hepa 1c1c7 cells were released from the culture dishes by trypsinization, washed, and subsequently suspended in culture medium and plated. Approximately 20 h later, cultures were treated with SnET2 and/or UDCA, washed, irradiated, and cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 chamber. Colonies were scored 7–8 days later. Previous studies have shown that only a low percentage of Hepa 1c1c7 cells divide in the first 20 h after passaging, and that this time is sufficient to replenish the glutathione lost from the cells as a consequence of trypsinization (18) .

Intracellular Accumulation of CPO and SnET2.

L1210 or Hepa 1c1c7 cells were incubated in growth medium containing 2μ m sensitizer ± 100 μm UDCA for 15 min (L1210) or 25 min (Hepa) at 37°C. Washed L1210 pellets were suspended in 3 ml of 10 mm Triton X-100. Hepa 1c1c7 cultures were washed with PBS, covered with 3 ml of 10 mm Triton X-100, and scraped from the plates. Levels of sensitizer in the cell lysates were assessed by fluorescence, using 400 nm excitation. A series of graded drug solutions in 10 mm Triton X-100 was used to produce a standard curve. Intracellular drug accumulations are reported as nmol/106 cells. We also examined the effect of UDCA on sites of sensitizer localization using fluorescence microscopy (15) .

Western Blots for Cytochrome c.

Control L1210 cells and cells after treatment with 100 μm UDCA, an LD50 PDT dose with SnET2, or the same PDT dose with 100 μm UDCA added during the incubation with SnET2 were collected by centrifugation. The procedure used for the Western blot detection of cytosolic cytochrome c has been described in detail and used 15% acrylamide-SDS gels (2) .

Statistical Analyses.

Data were analyzed by the Tukey HSD test. The Statistica 5.0 software package (StaSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK) was used to perform these calculations. Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Proapoptotic Effects of UDCA on Photodamaged L1210 Cells.

Irradiation of L1210 cells loaded with 2 μm of the photosensitizing agents SnET2 or CPO for 15 min led to the appearance of 12 ± 4% apoptotic nuclei 60 min after irradiation and a ∼50% reduction in viability (Table 1 ⇓ ; Fig. 2 ⇓ ). Incubation of cells with 100 μm UDCA alone for 15 min, followed by a second incubation for 60 min in fresh medium, did not yield a detectable apoptotic response nor any loss of cell viability. In contrast, irradiation of cells loaded with either sensitizer + UDCA (extracellular concentration, 100 μm) greatly enhanced the number of apoptotic nuclei (Table 1 ⇓ ; Fig. 2 ⇓ ) and reduced viability to <10% (Table 1) ⇓ . A dose-response study revealed a relationship between the UDCA concentration and the activation of caspase-3, as measured by observing DEVDase activity after irradiation, using either sensitizer (Table 2) ⇓ .

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effect of UDCA on PDT-induced apoptosis in L1210 cells as detected by HO342 labeling. Cells were incubated with sensitizer and/or 100 μm UDCA for 15 min prior to being washed, refed, and irradiated. Cultures were incubated for an additional 60 min at 37°C before HO342 labeling. A, control cells; B, cells incubated with 2 μm CPO and irradiated (270 mJ/cm2); C, cells incubated with CPO + 100 μm UDCA and irradiated; D, control cells incubated with 100 μm UDCA; E, cells incubated with 2 μm SnET2 and irradiated (200 mJ/cm2); F, cells incubated with SnET2 + 100 μm UDCA and irradiated. Bar, 10 μm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Effect of bile acids on viability after PDT

L1210 cells were incubated with 2μM SnET2 or CPO and 100μ m UDCA or the corresponding glycine (GUDCA) or taurine (TUDCA) conjugates for 15 min at 37°C, washed, suspended in fresh medium, and irradiated at 660 or 610 nm as described in the legend to Fig. 2 ⇓ . Colonies were counted 5–7 days later. Numbers represent the mean ± SD for three determinations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Effect of UDCA on PDT-induced DEVDase activity

L1210 cells were incubated with no sensitizer, 2 μm CPO, or SnET2 plus specified concentrations of UDCA for 15 min at 37°C, resuspended in fresh medium, irradiated (see the legend to Fig. 2 ⇓ ), and then incubated for an additional 5 min at 37°C. Levels of DEVDase were then measured. Data represent mean ± SD for four determinations.

Effects of UDCA on ΔΨm and Cytochrome c Release.

Approximately 15% of the L1210 cells loaded with 2μ m SnET2 showed a rapid loss ofΔΨ m after irradiation, as defined by a marked alteration in the MTO labeling pattern (Fig. 3 ⇓ , A versus B). When UDCA was included during the initial incubation with SnET2, a loss ofΔΨ m was observed in >95% of cells after irradiation (Fig. 3C) ⇓ .

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

UDCA potentiation of PDT-mediated disruption ofΔΨ m and cytochrome c release by L1210 cells. Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) detected with MTO in: A, control L1210 cells; B, cells treated with 2 μm SnET2; C, cells treated with the same PDT dose but with 100 μm UDCA present during the loading incubation. Cells were labeled with MTO directly after irradiation (270 mJ/cm2) at 10°C. Bar, 10 μm. Lower panel, release of cytochrome c from mitochondria into the cytosol using Western blot analysis with 10 μg of protein applied to each lane. From left: cytochrome c control (Cyto c); cytosol from control cells (Control); cells treated for 15 min at 37°C with 100μ m UDCA (UDCA); cells treated with SnET2 and light as described above (PDT); and cells given the same PDT dose with 100 μm UDCA present during the loading incubation (PDT/UDCA).

The loss of mitochondrial membrane potential is generally accompanied by release of cytochrome c into the cytosol. UDCA alone did not enhance cytochrome c release into the cytosol (Fig. 3 ⇓ , bottom panel). However, inclusion of UDCA at the time of loading with SnET2 markedly elevated cytochrome c release into the cytosol after irradiation (Fig. 3 ⇓ , bottom panel). A similar result was obtained with CPO (not shown).

Proapoptotic Effects of UDCA Conjugates.

Administration of UDCA to humans results in a substantial conversion of UDCA to the glycine and taurine conjugates GUDCA and TUDCA, respectively (19) . Neither GUDCA nor TUDCA was cytostatic or cytotoxic to L1210 cells, but both conjugates were as potent as UDCA in potentiating the cytotoxic effects of SnET2 when used in a PDT protocol (Table 1) ⇓ .

Caspase-3 Activation in Hepa 1c1c7 Cells.

Treatment of Hepa 1c1c7 cells with 100 μm UDCA for 25 min did not result in the activation of caspase-3 (Fig. 4) ⇓ nor the development of apoptotic nuclei (data not shown). A 30 s irradiation of Hepa 1c1c7 cultures treated with 2 μm SnET2 stimulated the activation of caspase-3. This activation was detected 90 min after irradiation. A concentration of 100 μm UDCA dramatically accelerated the kinetics of appearance and the magnitude of caspase-3 activation after a 30-min irradiation. Similar effects were seen when the duration of irradiation was increased from 30 to 60 s. On the basis of the caspase-3 activation measurements, a concentration of 50μ m UDCA also potentiated the apoptotic response to PDT.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Effects of UDCA on PDT-induced activation of caspase-3 in Hepa 1c1c7 cells. Cultures were incubated with 2μ m SnET2 and/or specified levels of UDCA for 25 min, washed, and then irradiated for 0, 30, or 60 s (0, 45, or 90 mJ/cm2). After irradiation, UDCA was added back, and the cultures were harvested 30, 60, and 90 min afterward for analyses of caspase-3 activity. Triangles, postirradiation time (30–90 min) that elapsed prior to harvesting for caspase assays. Data represent means of quadruplicate analyses; bars, SD.

The results shown in Fig. 4 ⇓ used a protocol in which UDCA was present both before and after irradiation. An additional experiment was carried out to assess the effect of adding UDCA only after irradiation. Data shown in Fig. 5 ⇓ indicate that the addition of 20–100 μm UDCA after irradiation did not potentiate caspase-3 activation.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Effects of postirradiation addition of UDCA on PDT-induced activation of caspase-3. Hepa 1c1c7 cultures were incubated with 2μ m SnET2 for 25 min, washed, and then irradiated for 60 s (90 mJ/cm2). After irradiation, varied concentrations of UDCA were added back, and the cultures were harvested 90 min later for analyses of caspase-3 activity. Data represent means of quadruplicate analyses; bars, SD.

Clonogenic Studies with Hepa 1c1c7 Cells.

Exposure of Hepa 1c1c7 cultures to 100 μm UDCA for 25 min had no effect on cell viability. Addition of varied concentrations of UDCA during the SnET2-loading incubation resulted in a concentration-dependent potentiation of cell killing by PDT (Table 3) ⇓ . When cultures were incubated with 100μ m UDCA, the LD50 PDT dose with SnET2 became an LD99 dose. Significant potentiation of cell killing was detected even with a 10μ m concentration of UDCA (Table 3) ⇓ .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Effect of UDCA on Hepa 1c1c7 viability after PDT

Hepa 1c1c7 cultures were incubated with SnET2 (2 μm) and specified concentrations of UDCA for 25 min at 37°C, then transferred to fresh medium and irradiated at 660 nm (45 mJ/cm2). Colonies were counted 7–8 days later. Numbers represent the mean ± SD for four culture dishes.

Effects of UDCA on Accumulation of SnET2.

Cotreatment of either L1210 or Hepa 1c1c7 cells with 100μ m UDCA during the sensitizer-loading incubation did not promote accumulation of SnET2 (Table 4) ⇓ . Similarly, UDCA did not promote the accumulation of CPO in L1210 cells (Table 4) ⇓ . In other studies, we could not detect any effects of UDCA on subcellular sites of sensitizer localization (not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Effect of UDCA on sensitizer accumulation

L1210 and Hepa 1c1c7 cells were incubated with 2 μm concentrations of specified sensitizer ± 100μ m UDCA for 15 and 25 min, respectively, at 37°C prior to being washed and lysed for subsequent determination of intracellular content of sensitizer. Data represent the mean ± SD for four to five determinations. The addition of UDCA did not significantly affect the accumulation of sensitizer by either cell line, NA, not assayed.

DISCUSSION

Several earlier reports indicated that UDCA protected cells in culture from the apoptotic effects of a variety of stimuli (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) . This protective mechanism was attributed to stabilization of the mitochondrial structure, thereby preventing the loss of cytochrome c (9, 10, 11, 12) . The latter event is known to trigger an apoptotic response via the Apaf-1/caspase-9 pathway (3) . In this report, we describe a different effect of UDCA: promotion of the apoptotic response to mitochondrial photodamage.

UDCA at a 100 μm concentration, in the absence of any other treatment, neither induced caspase-3 activation in L1210 or 1c1c7 cells nor was cytotoxic. Similar effects have been noted by several groups in a variety of cultured cell types (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) . However, coexposure of L1210 and 1c1c7 cells to mitochondrial sensitizers and UDCA prior to irradiation markedly potentiated PDT-induced apoptosis. This potentiation reflected enhanced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c, and activation of caspase-3. The basis for the potentiating effects of UDCA is unclear. However, data shown in Table 4 ⇓ clearly demonstrate that this potentiation does not reflect an enhanced accumulation of the sensitizer in UDCA-treated cells.

The very hydrophobic UDCA analogues, lithocholic acid and DCA, can elicit a very rapid apoptotic response (12) , as can other agents with amphipathic properties, e.g., Triton X-100 (20) . These effects are likely the consequence of a chaotropic interaction with the mitochondrial membrane, leading to the spontaneous release of cytochrome c. UDCA has been shown to protect against the apoptogenic effects of lithocholic acid and DCA by competing with the hydrophobic bile acids for mitochondrial binding sites. We propose that UDCA alone does not cause mitochondrial membrane damage. Rather, it lowers the threshold at which photodamage destabilizes the mitochondrial membrane. This idea is supported by the finding that potentiation of PDT with mitochondrial sensitizers occurred when cells were exposed to UDCA prior to, but not after, irradiation (Figs. 4 ⇓ and 5) ⇓ .

PDT is currently being investigated as a means for selective tumor eradication (1) . The results described here indicate an enhanced phototoxic response when UDCA is used in conjunction with two photosensitizing agents that catalyze mitochondrial photodamage. A variety of other sensitizers fall into this class including Photofrin (21) , benzoporphyrin derivative (22) , and protoporphyrin derived from administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid (21) . All of these agents have received Food and Drug Administration approval for photodynamic therapy or are in clinical trials. Several procedures have been suggested for enhancing the efficacy of PDT, including fractionated light dose (23) and hyperoxygenation of tissues (24) . We propose that the use of UDCA may be a simpler approach to this same end.

Because UDCA has a long history of clinical safety (4 , 5) , addition of this agent to a clinical protocol might present a minimal challenge with regard to potential adverse reactions. In addition, UDCA has two features that facilitate its use in PDT protocols. Enhancement of the PDT response by UDCA only requires it to be present at the time of loading with the sensitizer. Moreover, the taurine and glycine conjugates of UDCA retain proapoptotic activity in PDT protocols with mitochondrial sensitizers. The latter is an important factor because metabolism of UDCA to these conjugates occurs readily in humans (19) . The potential for UDCA as a means for enhancing PDT efficacy in vivo remains to be established, especially with regard to selectivity for normal versus neoplastic tissues. Because many of the photosensitizing agents in current clinical use have mitochondrial targets, UDCA may be a valuable addition to current protocols.

Acknowledgments

We thank Patricia Mathieu and Ann Marie Santiago for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported in part by Grant CA23378 from the NIH, Grant ES09392 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and by an award from the Protease Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201. Phone: (313) 577-1766; Fax: (313) 577-6739: E-mail: dhkessel{at}med.wayne.edu

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: PDT, photodynamic therapy; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid; TUDCA, tauro-UDCA; AMC, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; CPO, 9-capronyloxy-tetrakis(methoxyethyl) porphycene; DEVD-AMC, asp-glu-val-asp-aminomethylcoumarin; DCA, deoxycholic acid; GUDCA, glyco-UDCA; HO342, Höchst dye HO33342;ΔΨ m, mitochondrial membrane potential; MTO, MitoTracker Orange; SnET2, tin etiopurpurin.

  • Received October 18, 2000.
  • Accepted June 5, 2000.
  • ©2000 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Dougherty T. J., Gomer C. J., Henderson B. W., Jori G., Kessel D., Korbelik M., Moan J., Peng Q. Photodynamic therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 889-905, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Kessel D., Luo Y. Photodynamic therapy: a mitochondrial inducer of apoptosis. Cell Death Differ., 6: 28-35, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Budihardjo I., Oliver H., Lutter M., Luo X., Wang X. Biochemical pathways of caspase activation during apoptosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 15: 269-290, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Heathcote E. J. Management of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology, 31: 1005-1013, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Carrilho-Ribero L., Pinto-Correia A., Velosa J. , and de Moura. M. C. Long-term gallbladder stone recurrence risk factors after successful lithotripsy. Eur. J. Gastroenterol., 12: 209-215, 2000.
  6. ↵
    Ljubuncie P., Fuhrman B., Oiknine J., Aviram M., Bomzon A. Effect of deoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid on lipid peroxidation in cultured macrophages. Gut, 39: 475-478, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Mitsuyoshi H., Nakashima T., Sumida Y., Yoh T., Nakajima Y., Ishikawa H., Inaba K., Sakamoto Y., Okanoue T., Kashima K. Ursodeoxycholic acid protects hepatocytes against oxidative injury via induction of antioxidants. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 263: 537-542, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Nguyen T. D., Oliva L., Villard P. H., Puyoou F., Sauze C., Montet A. M., Lacarelle B., Durand A., Montet J. C. CYP2E1 and CYP3A1/2 gene expression is not associated with the ursodeoxycholate effect on ethanol-induced lipoperoxidation. Life Sci., 65: 1103-1113, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Rodrigues C. M., Fan G., Wong P. Y., Kren B. T., Steer C. J. Ursodeoxycholic acid may inhibit deoxycholic acid-induced apoptosis by modulating mitochondrial transmembrane potential and reactive oxygen species production. Mol. Med., 4: 165-178, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Rodrigues C. M., Ma X., Linehan-Stieers C., Fan G., Kren B. T., Steer C. J. Ursodeoxycholic acid prevents cytochrome c release in apoptosis by inhibiting mitochondrial membrane depolarization and channel formation. Cell Death Differ., 6: 842-854, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Rodrigues C. M., Fan G., Ma X., Kren B. T., Steer C. J. A novel role for ursodeoxycholic acid in inhibiting apoptosis by modulating mitochondrial membrane perturbation. J. Clin. Investig., 101: 2790-2799, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Botla R., Spivey J. R., Aguilar H., Bronk S. F., Gores G. J. Ursodeoxycholate (UDCA) inhibits the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition induced by glycochenodeoxycholate: a mechanism of UDCA cytoprotection. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 272: 930-938, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Morgan A. R., Garbo G. M., Keck R. W., Selman S. H. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: combined effect of metallopurpurin derivatives and light on transplantable bladder tumors. Cancer Res., 48: 194-198, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Toledano H., Edrei R., Kimel S. Photodynamic damage by liposome-bound porphycenes: comparison between in vitro and in vivo models. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol., 42: 20-27, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Kessel D., Luo Y., Deng Y., Chang C. K. The role of subcellular localization in initiation of apoptosis by photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol., 65: 422-426, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Kessel D., Luo Y., Mathieu P., Reiners J. J., Jr. Determinants of the apoptotic response to lysosomal photodamage. Photochem. Photobiol., 71: 196-200, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Reiners J. J., Jr., Clift R. E. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulation of ceramide-induced apoptosis in murine hepatoma 1c1c7 cells. A function independent of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 2502-2510, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Reiners J. J., Jr., Mathieu P., Okafor C., Putt D. A., Lash L. H. Depletion of cellular glutathione by conditions used for the passaging of adherent cultured cells. Toxicol. Lett., 115: 153-163, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Crosignani A., Setchell K. D., Invernizzi P., Larghi A., Rodrigues C. M., Podda M. Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic bile acids. Clin. Pharmacokinet., 30: 333-358, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Borner M. M., Schneider E., Pirnia F., Sartor O., Trepel J. B., Myers C. E. The detergent Triton X-100 induces a death pattern in human carcinoma cell lines that resembles cytotoxic lymphocyte-induced apoptosis. FEBS Lett., 353: 129-132, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Wilson B. C., Olivo M., Singh G. Subcellular localization of Photofrin and aminolevulinic acid and photodynamic cross-resistance in vitro in radiation-induced fibrosarcoma cells sensitive or resistant to Photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol., 65: 166-176, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Richter A. M., Yip S., Meadows H., Jain A. K., Neyndorff H., Moreno G., Salet C., Levy J. G. Photosensitizing potencies of the structural analogues of benzoporphyrin derivative in different biological test systems. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg., 14: 335-341, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Curnow A., McIlroy B. W., Postle-Hacon M. J., MacRobert A. J., Bown S. G. Light dose fractionation to enhance photodynamic therapy using 5-aminolevulinic acid in the normal rat colon. Photochem. Photobiol., 69: 71-76, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Maier A., Anegg U., Tomaselli F., Rehak P., Sankin O., Fell B., Renner H., Pinter H., Smolle-Juttner F. M., Friehs G. B. Does hyperbaric oxygen enhance the effect of photodynamic therapy in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma?. A clinical pilot study. Endoscopy, 32: 42-48, 2000.
PreviousNext
Back to top
December 2000
Volume 60, Issue 24
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Potentiation of Photodynamic Therapy by Ursodeoxycholic Acid
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Potentiation of Photodynamic Therapy by Ursodeoxycholic Acid
David Kessel, Joseph A. Caruso and John J. Reiners Jr.
Cancer Res December 15 2000 (60) (24) 6985-6988;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Potentiation of Photodynamic Therapy by Ursodeoxycholic Acid
David Kessel, Joseph A. Caruso and John J. Reiners Jr.
Cancer Res December 15 2000 (60) (24) 6985-6988;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Biological and Biochemical Effects of CP-654577, a Selective erbB2 Kinase Inhibitor, on Human Breast Cancer Cells
  • Novel Mechanisms of Apoptosis Induced by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
  • Phosphatidylinositol 3′-Kinase Is Required for Growth of Mast Cells Expressing the Kit Catalytic Domain Mutant
Show more Experimental Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement