Advertisement
Carcinogenesis

Genotoxic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon ortho-Quinones Generated by Aldo-Keto Reductases Induce CYP1A1 via Nuclear Translocation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor

Michael E. Burczynski and Trevor M. Penning
DOI:  Published February 2000

Abstract

Procarcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) induce their own metabolism and activation by binding to the cytosolic aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which then translocates to the nucleus and activates CYP1A1 gene transcription via xenobiotic response elements (XREs). Although the AhR demonstrates a strict specificity for planar aromatics, nonplanar (±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene also induced CYP1A1 expression in HepG2 cells over a delayed timecourse (∼6–12 h), suggesting a requirement for (±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene metabolism. Aldo-keto reductase (AKR) inhibitors blocked this effect, suggesting that benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dione (BPQ), a planar PAH o-quinone generated by AKRs, was the downstream inducer. BPQ was found to be a potent and rapid inducer of CYP1A1, with an EC50 value in HepG2 cells identical to that of the parent benzo(a)pyrene. BPQ was a more potent inducer of CYP1A1 when compared with the 1,6-, 3,6-, and 6,12-benzo(a)pyrene-diones. Multiple PAH o-quinones caused induction of CYP1A1, demonstrating that this was a general property of AKR-generated PAH o-quinones. HepG2-101L cells stably transfected with a XRE-luciferase construct showed that BPQ activated CYP1A1 transcription via a XRE-dependent mechanism. BPQ failed to induce CYP1A1 in AhR-deficient and AhR nuclear translocator-deficient murine hepatoma cell lines and confirmed that induction of CYP1A1 was AhR and AhR nuclear translocator-dependent. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated the specific appearance of BPQ-activated AhR in the nucleus, and immunofluorescence studies confirmed that BPQ mediated nuclear translocation of the AhR. Classical bifunctional inducers elevate CYP1A1 expression via a XRE and are subsequently converted by CYP1A1 to electrophiles that induce phase II enzymes via an electrophilic response element/antioxidant response element. PAH o-quinones represent a novel class of bifunctional inducer because they are electrophiles produced by phase II enzymes that simultaneously induce phase I enzymes via a XRE and phase II enzymes via a electrophilic response element/antioxidant response element (see also M. E. Burczynski et al., Cancer Res., 59: 607–614, 1999). This study shows that the AhR provides the only known mechanism by which genotoxic PAH o-quinones generated in the cytosol can be targeted to the nucleus with specificity.

INTRODUCTION

PAHs3 (B(a)P, for example) are ubiquitous environmental procarcinogens that require metabolic activation to exert their carcinogenic effects (1, 2, 3) . A major pathway of PAH metabolic activation proceeds through the CYP-mediated generation of PAH trans-dihydrodiol proximate carcinogens (4) . Once formed, PAH trans-dihydrodiols can undergo further oxidative metabolism to reactive electrophiles via two distinct enzymatic pathways (Fig. 1)⇓ .

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Roles of CYPs and AKRs in the metabolic activation of PAH trans-dihydrodiols.

In the first pathway, human CYPs catalyze a secondary epoxidation vicinal to the trans-dihydrodiol to yield bay region diol-epoxides (4 , 5) . These diol-epoxides are protected from hydrolysis by epoxide hydrolase due to steric hindrance in the bay region (6) . Their resistance to hydrolyation may permit them to reach the nucleus from their site of formation, although the exact process whereby diol-epoxides access the nucleus is not known. PAH diol-epoxides are well-characterized metabolites that react readily with mutational hot spots in DNA to form stable adducts both in vitro and in vivo (7 , 8) . If unrepaired, anti-BPDE-DNA adducts result in misreplication and mutagenesis (9 , 10) .

A second pathway of PAH activation is catalyzed by AKRs (11 , 12) . The AKRs are monomeric cytosolic NADP(H)-dependent oxidoreductases (∼34 kDa), and several human isoforms (AKR1C1–AKR1C4) catalyze the oxidation of PAH trans-dihydrodiols to PAH o-quinones (12, 13) .4 In the case of B(a)P, the proximate carcinogen B(a)P-diol is converted by AKRs to BPQ. PAH o-quinones are electrophilic metabolites that enter futile redox cycles and amplify ROS multiple times (15) . PAH o-quinones are formed in rat hepatocytes by AKR1C9 and are both cytotoxic and genotoxic in vitro (16 , 17) . These quinones form stable and depurinating adducts with DNA, and their propensity to redox cycle could lead to oxidative damage of DNA (e.g., formation of 8′-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, strand scission, and base propenals; Refs. (18, 19, 20) . PAH o-quinones are gen-erated by AKRs in the cytosolic compartment, and how PAH o-quinones gain access to the nucleus is presently unknown. In disposition studies in primary rat hepatocytes, a significant amount of 20 μm[ 3H]BPQ (30%) was sequestered into the cell pellet (DNA, RNA, and protein) within 0.5 h (17) . Treatment of primary rat hepatocytes with these toxicological concentrations of BPQ results in extensive strand scission of the genomic DNA. These data suggest that BPQ generated in the cytosol, like anti-BPDE formed in the microsomes, can reach the nucleus.

PAHs are considered bifunctional inducers: they enhance the expression of both the CYPs and phase II (de)toxification enzymes (including the AKRs) through two distinct mechanisms (21) . In the first mechanism, PAHs bind directly to a cytosolic receptor termed the AhR that demonstrates a strict specificity for planar aromatic compounds (22) . Upon binding ligand, the cytosolic AhR dissociates from heat shock protein 90 and is rapidly translocated into the nucleus, where it forms a complex with its heterodimeric partner, ARNT. The ligand-bound AhR/ARNT complex then robustly activates the expression of a battery of genes containing XREs within their regulatory regions, including CYP1A1 (for reviews, see Refs. 23 and 24 ; Fig. 2⇓ ).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

The XRE and ARE/EpRE pathways responsible for the induction of CYPs and AKRs by PAH.

In the second mechanism, PAHs are activated by CYP1A1 metabolism to unidentified electrophiles. These electrophilic intermediates signal by an incompletely characterized mechanism to activate components (possibly activator protein 1 and/or the Nrf2/maf families of transcription factors) to bind and activate transcription from response elements termed AREs or EpREs present in the regulatory regions of responsive genes encoding phase II (de)toxification enzymes (Refs. 25, 26, 27, 28 , for a review, see Ref. 29 ). BPQ is formed in human hepatoma (HepG2) cells by AKR1C1 and autoregulates AKR1C1 expression, most likely via an ARE/EpRE-like mechanism (30) .

The present studies sought to determine whether downstream electrophilic metabolites of PAH might also feedback stimulate the expression of the CYP1A1 gene. In HepG2 cells, B(a)P-diol robustly enhanced CYP1A1 mRNA levels with delayed kinetics, implying that a downstream metabolite of B(a)P-diol was the actual CYP inducer. Subsequent studies identified PAH o-quinones generated by human AKRs as the inducers. PAH o-quinones induce CYP1A1 via the AhR signaling pathway, demonstrating that these electrophilic metabolites represent novel bifunctional inducers that require no further metabolism to simultaneously induce both phase II (de)toxification enzymes (via an EpRE/ARE due to their electrophilic/redox-active nature) and phase I activating enzymes (via the XRE due to their restored planarity). These studies also imply that the cytosolic colocalization of AKR enzymes and the AhR provides a mechanism whereby PAH o-quinones generated in the cytosol can be targeted to the nucleus with specificity. The nuclear targeting of these redox-active o-quinones by the AhR may contribute to the spectrum of oxidative DNA damage observed after exposure of cells to PAH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals and Reagents

Cell culture media and reagents were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). The Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System was obtained from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). Polyclonal rabbit anti-murine AhR antisera was purchased from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). B(a)P, benz(a)anthracene, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 6MPA, and ursodeoxycholic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI). NPQ and BPQ were synthesized according to previously published procedures (31 , 32) . BAQ and DMBAQ were gifts from Dr. Ronald G. Harvey (Ben May Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL). TCDD, B(a)P-diol, B(a)P-1,6-dione, B(a)P-3,6-dione, and B(a)P-6,12-dione were obtained from the National Cancer Institute Midwest Research Institute (Kansas City, MO). All other chemicals used were of the highest grade available. All PAHs are potentially hazardous and should be handled in accordance with NIH Guidelines for the Laboratory Use of Chemical Carcinogens.

Cell Culture

HepG2 hepatoma cells (passages 5–20) were maintained in Eagle’s MEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin solution. Hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c4, and hepa1c1c12 cells (kindly provided by Dr. Oliver Hankinson, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) were maintained in α-MEM (without nucleosides) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and 2.5 μg/ml fungizone solution (Irvine Scientific, Santa Anna, CA). HepG2-101L cells stably expressing a portion of the CYP1A1 gene promoter (−1612/+292) that bears three consensus XREs (a kind gift from Dr. Robert H. Tukey, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA) linked to a luciferase reporter were maintained in DMEM (with low glucose) supplemented with 5% non-heat-inactivated FCS, 5% non-heat-inactivated NuSerum IV, and 0.4 mg/ml G418 to maintain selection. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and passaged every 5 days at a 1Graphic20 dilution (HepG2, hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c4, and hepa1c1c12 cell lines) or every 7 days at a 1Graphic4 dilution (HepG2-101L). To measure either the induction of CYP1A1 RNA or the nuclear translocation of the AhR by electrophoretic mobility shift assays, 48 h before treatment, 3 × 106 hepatoma cells were seeded into 10-cm dishes containing fresh media. Two days later (∼60–70% confluence), cells were exposed to the various inducers. Aliquots (100μ l) of 100 × stock solutions in DMSO were added to 10 ml of fresh culture medium, and cells were incubated for the indicated times before harvesting. For XRE-luciferase reporter gene assays, 24 h before treatment, 1 × 106 cells were seeded into 6-well plates. One day later (70–80% confluence), cells were treated with the various inducers 12 h before harvesting.

RNA Isolation and Northern Analysis

Cellular RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent. Total RNA (10 μg) was separated by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose/formaldehyde gels and transferred overnight to Duralon-UV membranes (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Membranes were prehybridized in hybridization buffer (30% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1 m NaCl, and 1% SDS) with 100 μg/ml sheared salmon sperm DNA at 42°C for 2 h. After prehybridization, membranes were hybridized to 107 dpm of[α -32P]dATP probes corresponding to either: (a) a 1-kb EcoRI fragment of the human CYP450 1A1 3′ untranslated region (phP1-450-3′, ATCC 57259); (b) a 1-kb EcoRI fragment of the murine CYP450 1A1 (pMP1-450-3′, ATCC 63006); or (c) an 855-bp EcoRI fragment of human colon AKR1C1(hcDD/DD1) cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. Paul Ciaccio and Dr. Ken Tew, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) that were labeled by random priming to a specific activity of greater than 109 cpm/μg DNA. Hybridization was performed at 42°C for 16–24 h. After hybridization, blots were subjected to two high-stringency washes with 0.1× SSC plus 1% SDS at 60°C for 45 min and 30 min, respectively. Signal intensities were measured using the PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics), and blots were exposed to X-ray film at −80°C overnight. For purposes of normalization, blots were stripped and reprobed with a 780-bp PstI/XbaI fragment of human GAPDH labeled by random priming as described above.

Luciferase Reporter Assays

The luciferase assay was carried out using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay system from Promega. At the end of the treatment period, HepG2-101L cells were rinsed twice in ice-cold PBS and then incubated in 1 ml of 1× passive lysis buffer for 15 min on an orbital shaker at room temperature. Lysates were centrifuged for 30 s at 14,000 rpm in a microfuge, and aliquots of the cleared lysates were assayed immediately or stored at −70°C. The luciferase assay was carried out using 20 μl of cell lysate and 100 μl of Luciferase Assay Reagent II as provided. The light emitted was measured for 10 s using a Berthold Lumat LB-9501 luminometer. To normalize for protein present in the stable transfectant cell lysates, quantitation of protein content was performed on 100-μl aliquots of the cell lysate using the Bradford reagent (Biorad, Hercules, CA). All assays were found to be in the linear range versus time and protein concentration.

Nuclear Extract Preparation

Nuclear extracts were prepared by the method of Dignam as described in Ausubel et al. (33) , with minor modifications. After harvesting, cells were resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer [10 mm HEPES (pH 7.9) containing 1.5 mm MgCl2, 10 mm KCl, 0.5 mm DTT, and 0.2 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride] and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min. Pelleted cells were resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer and disrupted with 10 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer (>90% lysis by trypan blue exclusion). Nuclei were pelleted at 14,000 rpm for 30 min and then resuspended in 0.5× packed nuclear volume of (low salt) nuclear extraction buffer [20 mm HEPES (pH 7.9) containing 1.5 mm MgCl2, 0.2 mm EDTA, 25% glycerol, 0.02 m KCl, 0.5 mm DTT, and 0.2 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After dropwise addition of an equal volume of nuclear extraction buffer containing high salt (0.8 m KCl), samples were mixed on a tiltboard for 30 min at 4°C. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 30 s, and the supernatants (nuclear extracts) were assayed immediately for protein content using the Bradford reagent (Biorad) and used in subsequent electrophoretic mobility shift assays.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed using a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing a consensus XRE-binding site from the CYP1A1 promoter corresponding to −998 to −969 (5′-dTTCTCCGGTCCTTCTCACGCAACGCCTGGGCA-3′ (italic letters correspond to the core XRE sequence) of the human CYP1A1 gene (DRE-983, as described previously in Ref. 34 ). After annealing, the probes were labeled with[α -32P]dATP using the Klenow fragment (to fill in extra TT dinucleotide overhangs at either end of the annealed double-stranded oligonucleotide) and then purified through Qiaquik nucleotide removal columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Nuclear extracts (5μ g of protein) were incubated in binding buffer [25 mm HEPES (pH 7.9) containing 100 mm KCl, 6.25 mm MgCl2, 0.5 mm EDTA, 0.5 mm DTT, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10% glycerol] in the presence of 2.5 μg of BSA, 0.2 μg of poly(dI-dC), and 50 fmol of −32P-labeled XRE oligonucleotide (20,000 cpm) in a total volume of 15 μl at room temperature for 30 min. The reaction mixture was then subjected to electrophoresis through a 4.5% polyacrylamide gel containing 1× TBE and 1% glycerol. The gels were dried under a vacuum for autoradiography (overnight exposure) and subsequent PhosphorImager analysis. For competition experiments, nuclear extracts were incubated before the addition of labeled oligonucleotide for 10 min at room temperature with an excess of unlabeled oligonucleotides and then incubated in the binding reactions described.

Cell Growth and Fixation for Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Hepa1c1c7 cells were detached by trypsinization and seeded into 60-mm culture dishes containing sterile glass coverslips previously coated in a solution of collagen (100 μg/ml) for 1 h. Cells were seeded at 30% confluence and allowed to attach overnight. The following day, coverslips were washed with PBS at room temperature and then incubated in 4% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) for 15 min. After three rinses in PBS, coverslips were incubated in 0.05% Triton in PBS for 10 min.

Immunofluorescence Staining and Microscopy

Coverslips were blocked in 2% goat IgG in 0.05% Triton in PBS for 30 min. After aspiration, coverslips were incubated in a 1Graphic50 dilution of primary antibody solution (rabbit antimurine AhR) at room temperature for 90 min. After three rinses in 1× PBS, coverslips were incubated in a 1Graphic1000 dilution of secondary antibody solution (goat antirabbit IgG fluorescein conjugate) at room temperature for 90 min in the dark. Coverslips were washed three times with 1× PBS and then mounted onto glass slides in mounting media. Once dry, fluorescence was observed with a Nikon Diaphot fluorescent microscope.

RESULTS

Delayed Induction of Human CYP1A1 Expression by B(a)P-diol

Treatment of HepG2 cells with either 10 nm TCDD or 10μ m B(a)P (data not shown) led to a robust and rapid induction of CYP1A1 mRNA within 1–3 h. When HepG2 cells were treated with 10 μm B(a)P-diol, CYP1A1 mRNA was not induced until 6–12 h (Fig. 3)⇓ . The delayed but robust induction of CYP1A1 via B(a)P-diol suggested that this metabolite either (a) induced CYP1A1 expression via a novel mechanism or (b) required activation to a downstream metabolite capable of inducing CYP1A1 mRNA.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Delayed induction of CYP1A1 by B(a)P-diol. HepG2 cells (3 × 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of TCDD or B(a)P-diol in DMSO were added to fresh media to yield final concentrations of 10 nm (TCDD) or 10 μm[ B(a)P-diol] in 0.1% DMSO. After the appropriate time points, total RNA was harvested, and 10 μg of RNA per lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and analyzed for CYP1A1 expression as described in “Materials and Methods.” GAPDH reprobing (data not shown) revealed equal loading of all lanes.

Inhibition of B[a]P-diol-induced CYP1A1 Expression by AKR Inhibitors

B(a)P-diol can be metabolized to either the diol-epoxide anti-BPDE by human CYPs or to the ortho-quinone BPQ by human AKRs. The recent discovery that AKR1C1 is constitutively expressed in resting HepG2 cells, whereas CYP1A1 is not detectable (30) , suggested that AKR1C1-dependent oxidation of B(a)P-diol to BPQ may be the requisite metabolic event responsible for the induction of CYP1A1 mRNA by the proximate carcinogen. To test this hypothesis, HepG2 cells were coincubated with B(a)P-diol in the presence of two AKR1C1 inhibitors of varying potency (Fig. 4)⇓ . Both 6MPA and ursodeoxycholic acid inhibited the B(a)P-diol-dependent induction of CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells with IC50 values that were higher but approach the IC50 values observed for the inhibition of purified recombinant AKR1C1 in vitro, respectively (Ref. 30 ; data not shown). These data suggest that the AKR1C1-dependent oxidation of B(a)P-diol to BPQ is the metabolic event responsible for the induction of CYP1A1 in B(a)P-diol-treated HepG2 cells.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Inhibition of B(a)P-diol-induced CYP1A1 expression by AKR inhibitors. HepG2 cells (3 × 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of ursodeoxycholate (top) or 6MPA (bottom) were added to fresh media to yield the appropriate final concentrations. After a 30-min preincubation with AKR inhibitors, 5 μm B(a)P-diol was added to the media. After 12 h, RNA was harvested, and 10 μg of RNA per lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and sequentially analyzed for CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA, and signal intensities were determined using the PhosphorImager system as described in “Materials and Methods.” Results for each concentration of inhibitor are expressed as the percentage of control CYP1A1GraphicGAPDH ratio (i.e. after a 12-h incubation with 5 μm B(a)P-diol in the absence of inhibitors). Mean ± SE of triplicate determinations is given.

CYP1A1 Induction Potencies of Various B(a)P Metabolites in HepG2 Cells

To directly demonstrate that BPQ was capable of inducing CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells, dose-response curves for B(a)P and its CYP- and AKR-derived metabolites (B(a)P-diol, anti-BPDE, and BPQ) were compared with the prototypical CYP1A1 inducer TCDD (Fig. 5)⇓ . The ED50 for the TCDD-dependent induction of CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells was approximately 1 nm. B(a)P and BPQ were nearly equipotent in their ability to induce CYP1A1 mRNA (ED50 ∼1 μm), and both were less efficacious than TCDD. Importantly both compounds produced a rapid (∼1 h) and robust induction of CYP1A1 mRNA, suggesting that neither inducer required metabolism to an active species. The finding that B(a)P is approximately 1000-fold less potent than the nonmetabolizable inducer TCDD is consistent with previous reports comparing TCDD and PAH (35) . anti-BPDE was incapable of inducing CYP1A1 levels, even at the highest doses tested (30 μm). Thus, BPQ is the only downstream B(a)P-diol metabolite that acts as a direct inducer of CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

CYP1A1 induction potencies of various B(a)P metabolites. HepG2 cells (3 × 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of TCDD (•), B(a)P (○), B(a)P-diol (▾), anti-BPDE (▪), or BPQ (▿) in DMSO were added to fresh media to yield the appropriate range of final concentrations in 0.1% DMSO. After 6 h, total RNA was harvested, and 10 μg of RNA per lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and sequentially analyzed for CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA as described in “Materials and Methods.” Results for each time point were determined by PhosphorImager analysis and are expressed as the fraction of the maximal CYP1A1GraphicGAPDH ratio (observed with 30 nm TCDD).

Comparison of CYP1A1 mRNA Induction in HepG2 Cells by PAH ortho-Quinones and Extended Quinones of B(a)P

To determine whether induction of CYP1A1 expression is a hallmark of all PAH quinones, a series of PAH quinones were screened as potential inducers of CYP1A1 (Fig. 6)⇓ . In the first experiment, three extended quinones of B(a)P derived from CYP-generated phenol metabolites were compared with the AKR-generated ortho-quinone BPQ for their ability to induce CYP1A1 in HepG2 cells. BPQ was a superior inducer of CYP1A1 mRNA when compared with the 1,6-, 3,6-, and the 6,12-benzo(a)pyrene-diones. The abilities of various PAH o-quinones generated by AKRs to induce CYP1A1 were widely disparate (Fig. 6)⇓ . The rank order of potency was BPQ > BAQ > NPQ > DMBAQ. This rank order inversely follows their reactivity with cellular thiols, e.g., glutathione (data not shown), suggesting that increased electrophilicity of PAH o-quinones may limit their ability to induce CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

CYP1A1 induction by multiple classes of PAH quinones. HepG2 cells (3 × 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of TCDD (final concentration, 30 nm; (Lane 1) or 3μ m of (in 1% DMSO) B(a)P (Lane 2), BPQ (Lane 3), BAQ (Lane 4), B(a)P-3,6-dione (Lane 5), NPQ (Lane 6), B(a)P-6,12-dione (Lane 7), DMBAQ (Lane 8), B(a)P-1,6-dione (Lane 9), or DMSO (Lane 10) were added. After 6 h, total RNA was harvested, and 10 μg of RNA per lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and sequentially analyzed for CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA, and signal intensities were determined using the PhosphorImager system as described in “Materials and Methods.” Results are expressed as a fraction of TCDD maximal induction of CYP1A1.

Transcriptional Activation of XRE-dependent Reporter Gene Expression by BPQ

To determine whether the observed increases in steady-state CYP1A1 mRNA levels by BPQ were due to increased transcription of the CYP1A1 gene via a XRE, the ability of BPQ to induce XRE-dependent reporter gene expression was studied. HepG2-101L cells, which carry a stably integrated XRE-containing portion of the CYP1A1 promoter (−1612/+292) fused to the luciferase reporter gene (36) , were exposed to either B(a)P (positive control) or BPQ. Both B(a)P and BPQ efficiently stimulated transcription (∼20- and 13-fold, respectively) from the XRE-reporter (Fig. 7)⇓ , demonstrating that BPQ mediates transcription of CYP1A1 mRNA via XREs located in the 5′ flanking region of the CYP1A1 gene.

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

BPQ activates XRE-dependent luciferase gene transcription. HepG2-101L cells (1 × 106) were plated into 6-well plates in 2 ml of media. One day later, cells were exposed to 10μ m B(a)P or BPQ in 1% DMSO. Cells were harvested 12 h later in 1 ml of passive lysis buffer, and 100-μl aliquots were assayed for protein content and luciferase activity as described in “Materials and Methods.” Data are plotted as relative light units/mg protein for each treatment. Mean ± SE of triplicate determinations is given.

BPQ Fails to Induce CYP1A1 mRNA in AhR- or ARNT-deficient Cells

Because classical XRE-dependent transcription is activated by ligand binding to the AhR, we next tested whether the induction of CYP1A1 mRNA by BPQ was AhR dependent. The ability of BPQ to induce CYP1A1 mRNA in wild-type (1c1c7), AhR-deficient (1c1c12), and ARNT-deficient (1c1c4) murine hepatoma (hepa1) cells was therefore determined. Whereas BPQ was able to induce CYP1A1 in wild-type hepa1c1c7 cells (Fig. 8)⇓ , it failed to induce CYP1A1 in either AhR- or ARNT-deficient hepatoma cells. These results clearly indicate that BPQ, like TCDD and B(a)P, activates CYP1A1 expression via an AhR/ARNT-dependent pathway.

Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.

BPQ fails to induce CYP1A1 in AhR- and ARNT-deficient murine hepatoma cells. Hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c12, and hepa1c1c4 cells (3 × 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, they were treated with 1.0 μm BPQ to yield a final concentration of 1% DMSO. Control cells received 1% DMSO only. After 6 h, total RNA was harvested, and 10 μg of RNA per lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and sequentially analyzed for murine CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA levels as described in “Materials and Methods.”

BPQ Causes Translocation of the AhR to the Nucleus

To demonstrate the ability of BPQ to translocate the cytosolic AhR into the nucleus of human cells, HepG2 cells were exposed to BPQ or to the classical AhR ligands TCDD and B(a)P, and nuclear extracts were prepared. Incubation of equal amounts of nuclear extracts from untreated cells with a 32P-labeled XRE from the CYP1A1 gene (−983 to −964 bp) failed to induce the formation of a specific AhR-XRE complex. However, nuclear extracts from TCDD-, and BPQ-treated cells resulted in the appearance of a specific gel-shifted complex (Fig. 9)⇓ . This complex was specific for the XRE, because increasing concentrations of cold competitor XRE oligonucleotide successfully eliminated this complex without causing loss of the lower nonspecific band observed in all of the reactions.

Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.

BPQ causes specific binding of nuclear AhR to the XRE. Nuclear extracts from HepG2 cells treated for 90 min with DMSO, TCDD, or BPQ (Lanes 1–3, respectively) were prepared and incubated with the 5′ end-labeled XRE oligonucleotide probe and subjected to electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Arrow, specific shifted complex after TCDD and BPQ treatment. NS, nonspecific band. Lanes 4 and 5, BPQ-treated nuclear extracts in the presence of 500-fold molar excess of cold XRE or ARE oligonucleotide competitor 5′-CGCTTGATGACTCAGCCGGAA-3′ (underline indicates ARE), respectively. Lanes 6–10, BPQ-treated nuclear extracts in the presence of increasing amounts of cold XRE competitor DNA (0×, 1×, 20×, 50×, 100×).

As a further confirmation of this result, hepa1c1c7 cells were treated with DMSO, TCDD, anti-BPDE, or BPQ for 90 min and then fixed for AhR immunofluorescence staining and microscopy (Fig. 10)⇓ . In untreated cells, all immunofluorescence staining associated with the AhR was present in the cytosol (Fig. 10A)⇓ , and this staining pattern remained unchanged after treatment with anti-BPDE (Fig. 10C)⇓ . However, after treatment with either BPQ (Fig. 10D)⇓ or the classical AhR ligand TCDD (Fig. 10B)⇓ , a significant fraction of cells demonstrated intense AhR staining in the nucleus, confirming the ability of BPQ to cause translocation of AhR into the nucleus.

Fig. F10-9358.
Fig. F10-9358.

BPQ causes translocation of the AhR to the nucleus. Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various treatments for 90 min, and the subcellular distribution of AhR was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. A, 1% DMSO; B, 100 nm TCDD; C, 10 μm anti-BPDE; D, 10 μm BPQ.

DISCUSSION

The initial observation that the proximate carcinogen B(a)P-diol resulted in a substantial but delayed induction of CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells implied that a downstream electrophilic metabolite might be responsible for CYP1A1 induction. Coincubation of B(a)P-diol with two separate AKR inhibitors abolished the induction of CYP1A1 mRNA by B(a)P-diol, suggesting that the AKR-catalyzed oxidation of B(a)P-diol to the o-quinone BPQ was the requisite metabolic event. Subsequent studies directly demonstrated that AKR-generated BPQ was nearly equipotent with parent B(a)P with respect to its ability to induce CYP1A1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an electrophilic PAH metabolite produced by a phase II (de)toxification enzyme that is capable of inducing a phase I activating enzyme, e.g., CYP1A1, via the AhR pathway.

Because X-ray crystallographic studies show that the oxidation of the nonplanar B(a)P-diol by CYP1A1 results in the even more torsionally strained anti-BPDE (37) , it was not surprising that anti-BPDE failed to be an inducer of CYP1A1. In contrast, the oxidation of B(a)P-diol by AKRs initially results in a catechol, which then undergoes successive one-electron oxidations to form an o-quinone with carbons that are now sp2-hybridized at the 7 and 8 positions, restoring planarity to this electrophilic metabolite. Although there are no crystal structures of PAH o-quinones to date, energy minimization of B(a)P-diol, anti-BPDE, and BPQ structures using QUANTA/CHARMm verified the uniquely planar nature of BPQ (data not shown), a hallmark of AhR ligands.

These studies definitively show that PAH o-quinones utilize the classical AhR signal transduction pathway to cause the induction of CYP1A1. This was demonstrated by the ability of BPQ to (a) induce CYP1A1 expression over a rapid time course, activate XRE-dependent reporter gene expression, and cause translocation of the AhR to the nucleus; and (b) by the failure of BPQ to induce murine CYP1A1 in AhR- and ARNT-deficient murine hepatoma cells.

We have previously reported that AKR1C1 is constitutively expressed in HepG2 cells and that it oxidizes B(a)P-diol to BPQ efficiently (12 , 30) . This would suggest that the induction of CYP1A1 by B(a)P-diol should occur rapidly and not over the delayed time course reported here. However, a sufficient reservoir of “free” BPQ must first build up to act as a ligand of the AhR. Studies on [3H]B(a)P-diol metabolism in HepG2 cells reveal that there is a high level of glucuronyl- and sulfo-transferase activity present, and that free BPQ is only detected after 12–24 h.5 Thus, the time required to detect free BPQ after B(a)P-diol treatment is consistent with the time course observed for the indirect induction of CYP1A1 by B(a)P-diol.

Parent PAHs are classified as bifunctional inducers because as planar molecules they induce CYP1A1 expression via the AhR/XRE pathway, and after metabolism, their downstream metabolites induce phase II (de)toxification enzymes via the ARE pathway (21) . However, PAH o-quinones define a novel class of bifunctional inducer that does not require metabolism to induce gene expression via both mechanisms. In previous studies (12 , 30) , we demonstrated that AKR1C1 is induced (most likely via an ARE/EpRE-type mechanism) by its reaction product, the electrophilic and redox-active BPQ, thereby establishing an autoregulatory loop. PAH o-quinones produced by this pathway are therefore bifunctional because in the present studies they were also found to induce CYP1A1 via the AhR/XRE pathway. Thus, due to their uniquely dual planar/electrophilic nature, PAH o-quinones possess features that allow them to simultaneously induce both phase I and phase II gene expression through different mechanisms without a requirement for further metabolism. We compare the mechanism of classical bifunctional inducers described by Prochaska et al. (21) with the mechanism of action of the new bifunctional inducers PAH o-quinones (Fig. 11)⇓ . Because PAH o-quinones can differ in their electrophilicity by several orders of magnitude, their chemical reactivity may determine their relative abilities to activate phase I versus phase II (de)toxification gene expression via the XRE versus the ARE pathways, respectively.

Fig. F11-9358.
Fig. F11-9358.

PAH o-quinones as novel bifunctional inducers. A, PAHs are classical bifunctional inducers that induce phase I enzymes via the AhR and then require CYP-dependent metabolism to electrophilic intermediates to induce phase II enzymes via the ARE (21) . B, PAH o-quinones are novel bifunctional inducers that are electrophiles produced by AKR1C1 that can simultaneously induce phase II enzymes via the ARE and phase I enzymes via the AhR without a requirement for further metabolism.

The ability of AKRs to compete with CYPs and thereby divert B(a)P-diol from the potent mutagen and carcinogen anti-BPDE was initially believed to represent a bona fide detoxification route to an innocuous catechol (11) . However, it is well established that the resultant catechol spontaneously autoxidizes to BPQ, and that BPQ possesses an undesirable toxicological profile. First, because it is a Michael acceptor, it forms adducts with DNA, RNA, protein, and glutathione. With calf thymus DNA, both stable dG adducts and N7-guanine depurinating adducts have been reported (18 , 19) . The formation of the adducts proceeds via a ketol that rearranges to a catechol that is subsequently autoxidized to the o-quinone adduct, a sequence that generates reactive oxygen in proximity to DNA. Second, BPQ is redox active and will enter futile cycles to generate ROS multiple times. The amplification of ROS by BPQ and other PAH o-quinones explains their ability to cleave genomic DNA. DNA strand scission proceeds via a Criegee rearrangement and can lead to the formation of base-propenals and malondialdehyde (20) . Thus AKR-catalyzed BPQ formation represents a potential alternative promutagenic pathway to the CYP1A1-catalyzed formation of anti-BPDE. However, for these events to occur in whole cells, BPQ must gain access to the nucleus.

Our discovery that PAH o-quinones generated in the cytosol are shuttled into the nuclear compartment via the AhR reveals the only known mechanism by which genotoxic PAH o-quinones can be targeted to the nucleus with specificity. Although higher concentrations of BPQ (20 μm) can be sequestered in a nonspecific manner into the cell pellet, significantly lower concentrations of BPQ (∼100–300 nm) result in detectable CYP1A1 induction. Thus, at low concentrations, preferential targeting may indeed be achieved by the AhR. Because BPQ is a redox active compound and will enter into futile cycles, this specific targeting of low concentrations of BPQ could contribute to its genotoxic profile. In this regard, it is well known that after ligand-dependent translocation of the AhR to the nucleus, the AhR is rapidly degraded to limit the duration of CYP1A1 induction (38 , 39) . It is unclear, however, what happens to the previously bound ligand. Local liberation of PAH o-quinones in proximity to genomic DNA, which is known to contain copper (40 , 41) , will enhance redox cycling in the presence of nuclear reducing equivalents and provides a mechanism for the oxidative DNA damage observed with parent PAH in vitro and in vivo (42 , 43) . In the future, it will be interesting to determine whether the genotoxic effects of BPQ are attenuated in AhR-deficient cells.

In addition to the implications for the initiation phase of PAH carcinogenesis, the activation of the AhR by PAH o-quinones may also play a role in the promotion stage. The propensity of PAH o-quinones to redox cycle and amplify ROS in PAH-exposed cells may mimic the tumor-promoting effects of phorbol myristoyl acetate by generating oxidative stress, which can lead to the inappropriate activation of protein kinase C and expression of the proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun (44) . TCDD is also a well-established tumor promoter (45, 46, 47, 48) , and the ability of PAH o-quinones to mimic a well-characterized property of TCDD (CYP1A1 induction) may represent an epigenetic property of PAH o-quinones that contributes to the ability of PAHs to act as complete carcinogens.

In summary, these studies demonstrate that PAH o-quinones generated by human AKRs induce the PAH-activating enzyme CYP1A1 via an AhR-dependent mechanism. The ability of genotoxic PAH o-quinones to enter the nucleus and mimic the potent tumor promoter TCDD may have important implications for both the initiation and promotion phases of PAH carcinogenesis. These and other in vitro studies underscore the need to test PAH o-quinones as endogenously generated tumor-initiating/promoting metabolites of PAHs in in vivo models of chemical carcinogenesis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Oliver Hankinson for the murine hepatoma cells (hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c4, and hepa1c1c12) and Dr. Robert H. Tukey for the stably transfected human hepatoma cells (HepG2-101L) used in these studies. We also thank Drs. Randy Pittman, Matthew K. Perez, and Nicole Stone for help with the immunofluorescence microscopy.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by NIH Grants CA39504 and CA55711 (to T. M. P.) and a Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation Advanced Predoctoral Fellowship (to M. E. B.).

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084. Phone: (215) 898-9445; Fax: (215) 573-2236; E-mail: penning{at}pharm.med.upenn.edu

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; B(a)P, benzo(a)pyrene; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; AKR, aldo-keto reductase; ARE/EpRE, antioxidant response element/electrophilic response element; BPQ, benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dione; CYP, cytochrome P450; B(a)P-diol, (±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene; ARE, antioxidant response element; EpRE, electrophilic response element; XRE, xenobiotic response element; anti-BPDE, (±)-anti-7,8-dihydroxy-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; ARNT, AhR nuclear translocator; ROS, reactive oxygen species; 6MPA, 6-medroxyprogesterone acetate; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; BAQ, benz[a]anthracene-3,4-dione; NPQ, naphthalene-1,2-dione; DMBAQ, dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-3,4-dione; DD, dihydrodiol dehydrogenase[ trans-1,2-dihydrobenzene-1,2-diol dehydrogenase (EC 1.3.1.20)].

  • ↵4 The nomenclature for the AKR superfamily was proposed by Jez et al. (Ref. 14 ) and adopted at the 8th International Symposium on Enzymology and Molecular Biology of Carbonyl Metabolism in Deadwood, South Dakota, June 29–July 3, 1996.

  • ↵5 C. Yarosh and T. M. Penning, unpublished observations.

  • Received August 2, 1999.
  • Accepted December 9, 1999.

References

  1. ↵
    Gelboin H. V. Benzo[a]pyrene metabolism, activation and carcinogenesis: role and regulation of mixed function oxidases and related enzymes. Physiol. Rev., 60: 1107-1166, 1980.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Conney A. H. Induction of microsomal enzymes by foreign chemicals and carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. G. H. A. Clowes Memorial Lecture. Cancer Res., 42: 4875-4917, 1982.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Dipple, A. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenesis: Introduction. In: R. G. Harvey (ed.), Polycyclic Aromatic Carcinogenesis, pp. 1–17. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 283. Washington, D.C., American Chemical Society, 1985.
  4. ↵
    Yang S. K., McCourt D. W., Roller P. P., Gelboin H. V. Enzymatic conversion of benzo[a]pyrene leading predominantly to the diol-epoxide r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene through a single enantiomer of r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73: 2594-2598, 1976.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Thakker D. R., Yagi H., Lu A. Y. H., Levin W., Conney A. H., Jerina D. M. Metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene: conversion of (±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene to highly mutagenic 7,8-diol-9,10-epoxides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73: 3381-3385, 1976.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Hernandez, O., and Bend, J. R. Metabolism of epoxides. In: W. B. Jakoby (ed.), Metabolic Basis of Detoxication, pp. 207–228, New York: Academic Press, 1982.
  7. ↵
    Marshall C. J., Vousden K. H., Phillips D. H. Activation of c-Ha-ras-1 proto-oncogene by in vitro chemical modification with a chemical carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. Nature (Lond.), 310: 585-589, 1984.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Denissenko M. F., Pao A., Tang M. S., Pfieifer G. P. Preferential formation of benzo[a]pyrene adducts at lung cancer mutational hotspots in p53. Science (Washington DC), 274: 430-432, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Hruszkewicz A. M., Canella K. A., Peltonen K., Lotrappa L., Dipple A. DNA polymerase action on benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 13: 2347-2352, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Vousden K. H., Bos J. L., Marshall C. J., Phillips D. H. Mutations activating c-Ha-ras1 protooncogene (HRAS1) induced by chemical carcinogenesis and depurination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83: 1222-1226, 1986.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Smithgall T. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Regio- and stereospecificity of homogeneous 3α-hydroxysteroid-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase for trans-dihydrodiol metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Biol. Chem., 261: 6184-6191, 1986.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Burczynski M. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Expression and characterization of four recombinant human dihydrodiol dehydrogenase isoforms: oxidation of trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene to the activated o-quinone metabolite benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione. Biochemistry, 37: 6781-6790, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Smithgall T. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Spectroscopic identification of ortho-quinones as the products of polycyclic aromatic trans-dihydrodiol oxidation catalyzed by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem., 263: 1814-1820, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Jez J. M., Flynn T. G., Penning T. M. A new nomenclature system for the aldo-keto reductase superfamily. Biochem. Pharmacol., 54: 639-647, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Penning T. M., Ohnishi S. T., Ohnishi T., Harvey R. G. Generation of reactive oxygen species during the enzymatic oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon trans-dihydrodiols catalyzed by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9: 84-92, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Flowers-Geary L., Bleczinski W., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones produced by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Chem. Biol. Interact., 99: 55-72, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Flowers L., Bleczinski W. F., Burczynski M. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Disposition and biological activity of benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione. A genotoxic metabolite generated by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Biochemistry, 35: 13664-13672, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Shou M., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Reactivity of benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione with DNA. Evidence for the formation of deoxyguanosine adducts. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 475-482, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    McCoull K. D., Rindgen D., Blair I. A., Penning T. M. Synthesis and characterization of depurinating adducts of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 12: 237-246, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Flowers L., Ohnishi S. T., Penning T. M. DNA strand scission by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones: role of reactive oxygen species, Cu(II)/Cu(I) redox cycling and o-semiquinone anion radicals. Biochemistry, 36: 8640-8648, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Prochaska H. J., De Long M. J., Talalay P. On the mechanism of induction of cancer protective enzymes: a unifying proposal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 8232-8236, 1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Okey A. B., Riddick D. S., Harper P. A. Molecular biology of the aromatic hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 15: 226-232, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Hankinson O. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 35: 307-340, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Whitlock J. P., Jr., Okino S. T., Dong L., Ko H. P., Clarke-Katzenberg R., Ma Q., Li H. Induction of cytochrome P4501A1: a model for analyzing mammalian gene transcription. FASEB J., 10: 809-818, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    Talalay P., De Long M. J., Prochaska H. J. Identification of a common chemical signal regulating the induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85: 8261-8265, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Rushmore T. H., Morton M. R., Pickett C. B. The antioxidant responsive element. Activation by oxidative stress and identification of the DNA consensus sequence required for functional activity. J. Biol. Chem., 266: 11632-11639, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Venugopal R., Jaiswal A. K. Nrf2 and Nrf1 in association with Jun proteins regulate antioxidant response element-mediated expression and coordinated induction of genes encoding detoxifying enzymes. Oncogene, 17: 3145-3156, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Itoh K., Chiba T., Takahashi S., Ishii T., Igarashi K., Katoh Y., Oyake T., Hayashi N., Satoh K., Hatayama I., Yamamoto M., Nabeshima Y. An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 236: 313-322, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Hayes J. D., Pullford D. J. The glutathione-S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 30: 445-600, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Burczynski M. E., Lin H. K., Penning T. M. Isoform-specific induction of a human aldo-keto reductase by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), electrophiles and oxidative stress: implications for the alternative pathway of PAH activation catalyzed by human dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Cancer Res., 59: 607-614, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Fieser L. F. β-Napthoquinone and α-napthoquinone. Org. Synth., 2: 430-435, 1943.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    Sukumaran K. B., Harvey R. G. Synthesis of the o-quinones and dihydrodiols of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the corresponding phenols. J. Org. Chem., 45: 4407-4413, 1980.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Wiley, 1989.
  34. ↵
    Kress S., Greenlee W. F. Cell-specific regulation of human CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes. Cancer Res., 57: 1265-1269, 1997.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    Riddick D. S., Huang Y., Harper P. A., Okey A. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin versus 3-methylcholanthrene: comparative studies of Ah receptor binding, transformation, and induction of CYP1A1. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 12118-12128, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Postlind H., Vu T. P., Tukey R. H., Quattrochi L. C. Response of human CYP1-luciferase plasmids to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 118: 255-262, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Glusker, J. P. X-ray analyses of polycyclic hydrocarbon metabolite structures. In: R. G. Harvey (ed.), Polycyclic Hydrocarbons and Carcinogenesis, pp. 125–185. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 283. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1985.
  38. ↵
    Pollenz R. S. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, but not the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein, is rapidly depleted in hepatic and nonhepatic culture cells exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Mol. Pharmacol., 49: 391-398, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  39. ↵
    Giannone J. V., Li W., Probst M., Okey A. Prolonged depletion of AH receptor without alteration of receptor mRNA levels after treatment of cells in culture with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Biochem. Pharmacol., 55: 489-497, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Wacker W. E. C., Vallee B. L. Nucleic acids and metals. J. Biol. Chem., 231: 3257-3262, 1959.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    Prutz W. A., Butler J., Land E. J. Interaction of Cu(I) with nucleic acids. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 58: 215-234, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Leadon S. A., Stampfer M. R., Bartley J. Production of oxidative DNA damage during the metabolic activation of benzo[a]pyrene in human mammary epithelial cells correlates with cell killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85: 4345-4368, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Kim K. B., Lee B. M. Oxidative stress to DNA, protein and antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase and catalase) in rats treated with benzo[a]pyrene. Cancer Lett., 113: 205-212, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Cerutti P. A. Prooxidant states and tumor promotion. Science (Washington DC), 227: 375-381, 1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Shu H. P., Paustenbach D. J., Murray F. J. A critical evaluation of the use of mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, and tumor promotion data in a cancer risk assessment of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 7: 57-88, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Birnbaum L. S. The mechanism of dioxin toxicity: relationship to risk assessment. Environ. Health. Perspect., 102: 157-167, 1994.
  47. ↵
    Whysner J., Williams G. M. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlordibenzo-p-dioxin mechanistic data and risk assessment: gene regulation, cytotoxicity, enhanced cellular proliferation, and tumor promotion. Pharmacol. Ther., 71: 193-223, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Tritscher A. M., Goldstein J. A., Portier C. J., McCoy Z., Clark G. C., Lucier G. W. Dose-response relationships for chronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin in a rat tumor promotion model: quantification and immunolocalization of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 in the liver. Cancer Res., 52: 3436-3442, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
February 2000
Volume 60, Issue 4

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Genotoxic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon ortho-Quinones Generated by Aldo-Keto Reductases Induce CYP1A1 via Nuclear Translocation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
Michael E. Burczynski and Trevor M. Penning
Cancer Res February 15 2000 (60) (4) 908-915;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement