Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Advances in Brief

Tumor Location and Growth Pattern Correlate with Genetic Signature in Oligodendroglial Neoplasms

Magdalena C. Zlatescu, AliReza TehraniYazdi, Hikaru Sasaki, Joseph F. Megyesi, Rebecca A. Betensky, David N. Louis and J. Gregory Cairncross
Magdalena C. Zlatescu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AliReza TehraniYazdi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hikaru Sasaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph F. Megyesi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca A. Betensky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David N. Louis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Gregory Cairncross
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published September 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Molecular genetic subsets of anaplastic oligodendroglioma behave in biologically distinct ways, in both their rates of growth and their responses to standard therapies. In a series of 64 cases, we evaluated whether allelic loss of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q, an early molecular event in the genesis of chemosensitive oligodendrogliomas, is related to tumor location and extent of tumor spread in the brain. We observed that tumor genotype was closely associated with tumor location (P < 0.001). Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas located in the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes were significantly more likely to harbor allelic loss of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q than histologically indistinguishable tumors arising in the temporal lobe, insula, and diencephalon (P < 0.001). In addition, loss of heterozygosity for 1p and 19q was significantly associated with a bilateral pattern of growth (P = 0.037); all seven bilaterally distributed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas had 1p and 19q allelic loss. We conclude, therefore, that molecular subtypes of oligodendrogliomas may arise preferentially in certain lobes of the brain and have differential patterns of growth, with tumors having allelic loss of chromosomes 1p and 19q occurring most frequently in the frontal lobes and having a tendency for widespread growth across the midline. These findings encourage inquiries into the biological basis of such marked differences and already have implications for the current management of these neoplasms.

Introduction

Oligodendrogliomas were the first of the common malignant gliomas shown to be responsive to chemotherapy (1 , 2) and the first shown to have specific molecular genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival (3 , 4) . In anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, response to chemotherapy, duration of response to chemotherapy, progression-free survival after radiotherapy, and overall survival time are highly associated with allelic loss of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q (3 , 5 , 6) . This genetic signature is also the earliest known molecular derangement in 50–70% of oligodendroglial neoplasms. Today, effective therapies are available for a substantial percentage of patients with oligodendroglial neoplasms; genetic testing guides their use (5) . Moreover, such testing permits treatment-resistant oligodendrogliomas to be identified in advance of the administration of ineffective, toxic, and costly treatments. The study of oligodendrogliomas has therefore provided a paradigm for developing rational treatment strategies for tumors of the central nervous system and promises to afford researchers with unique insights into the biology and treatment of glial tumors.

In the course of treating patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas with chemotherapy, we noticed that tumors located in the temporal lobe, insula, and diencephalon responded to chemotherapy less frequently. We also noticed that oligodendrogliomas in these locations often tended to be well circumscribed on magnetic resonance images and to grow in an expansile, as opposed to infiltrative, fashion. These observations led us to inquire whether anaplastic oligodendrogliomas growing in different regions of the brain or growing in different ways might vary in their molecular makeup. The following analysis was designed to address these issues.

Materials and Methods

Case Selection.

Cases for this study were culled from a database of patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas who had received chemotherapy as their principal initial treatment. Information on tumor location and the status of chromosomal regions 1p and 19q (i.e., both regions) were the sole additional eligibility requirements for this analysis.

Tumor Location.

Tumor location was considered to be the lobe or region of the brain within which the bulk of the oligodendroglioma resided. Tumors that extended into neighboring lobes or regions were considered multilobar in distribution, those that appeared to arise in several distinct locations were deemed multifocal, and those that traversed the corpus callosum to involve the opposite cerebral hemisphere were judged to be bilateral. These assignments were based on an evaluation of patient records, imaging studies, or both.

Genetic Studies.

We assessed allelic chromosomal loss by loss of heterozygosity assays in constitutional DNA/tumor DNA pairs, using microsatellite markers on 1p36 (D1S2734, D1S199, and D1S508) and 19q13 (D19S219, D19S112, D19S412, and D19S596; Ref. 5 ). Tumor DNA was extracted from microdissected, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections; constitutional DNA was extracted from blood leukocytes or paraffin sections of adjacent, uninvolved brain or other tissues (7) .

Statistical Considerations.

Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the significance of associations between 1p and 19q allelic loss versus tumor location and growth pattern.

Results and Discussion

Sixty-four patients (34 men and 30 women), ages 17 to 82 years (mean age, 45 years), with a median Karnofsky Performance Score of 80 received chemotherapy as the principal initial postoperative treatment for a newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Thirty-four tumors were located predominantly in the frontal lobe, 15 in the temporal lobe, 7 in the parietal lobe, 1 in the occipital lobe, 5 in the insula, and 2 in the diencephalon. Forty tumors were confined to a single lobe or region of the brain, and 24 were multilobar. Sixty-three tumors were unifocal, and only 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma was judged to be multifocal in origin. Fifty-seven tumors were unilateral, and 7 were bilateral lesions involving both cerebral hemispheres. Forty-eight anaplastic oligodendrogliomas enhanced with contrast, with eight displaying ring enhancement. Thirty-nine tumors had loss of heterozygosity for chromosomal arms 1p and 19q, whereas both copies of chromosome 1p were intact in 25 tumors. The clinical, radiological, and genetic data are summarized in Table 1 ⇓ .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Clinical, radiological, and genetic features

In this series of newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, we observed a statistically significant association between genetic signature (i.e., 1p and 19q allelic loss versus 1p intact) and tumor location (P < 0.001). Moreover, our specific hypothesis that anaplastic oligodendrogliomas located in the temporal lobe, insula, and diencephalon are biologically distinct from histologically similar tumors in other locations is supported by these data. Tumors in the temporal lobe, insula, and diencephalon were significantly less likely to harbor allelic loss of chromosomes 1p and 19q (P < 0.001). Moreover, the 1p and 19q molecular signature was significantly associated with a bilateral versus unilateral pattern of growth (P = 0.037); all seven bilaterally distributed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas harbored 1p and 19q allelic loss. There was no significant association between genetic signature and unilobar versus multilobar distribution, and data were insufficient to analyze the association between genetic signature and multifocality.

The relationship between tumor location and contrast enhancement was also explored. We detected a statistically significant association between tumor location and contrast enhancement (grouped as no enhancement, enhancement, and ring enhancement; P < 0.001). Those anaplastic oligodendrogliomas that were located in the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes were significantly more likely to enhance with contrast (P = 0.002), whereas those tumors located in the temporal lobe, insula, and diencephalon that were enhanced with contrast were significantly more likely to display a ring enhancing pattern (P = 0.01). There was no statistically significant relationship between tumor location, as grouped above, and patient survival after adjusting for genetic signature (P = 0.139).

It has become clear over the past few years that molecular subsets of oligodendroglioma behave in biologically distinct ways, in both their growth rates and their responses to standard therapies (3 , 5 , 7) . This report extends those observations to show that molecular variants of oligodendroglioma have a predilection for certain lobes of the brain and vary in their extent of spread throughout the brain. Indeed, all seven cases of bilateral frontal oligodendrogliomas had 1p and 19q loss. To some extent, these findings mirror what has been observed in colonic carcinomas, in which right-sided and left-sided colon tumors exhibit different spectra of genetic alterations and may have different behaviors (8) .

The association of oligodendroglioma genotype with location and extent of spread raises a number of interesting possibilities and questions. One potential explanation for such an association posits that different types of oligodendrogliomas arise from different precursor cells that are relatively region-specific in the brain or appear at different stages of brain development. In this scenario, the cells of origin would determine the eventual behavior or location of the neoplasm. Hence, tumors arising from migratory precursor cells would themselves be migratory and grow as locally invasive cancers both radiologically and pathologically. Likewise, transformational events at distinct developmental stages would yield tumors that are differentially located in the brain. Indeed, different regions of the mammalian forebrain are known to contain glial progenitor cells that are preferentially committed to specific fates and destinations (9) . Furthermore, recent animal modeling has suggested that targeting oncogenic hits to particular progenitors cells can result in distinct phenotypes of oligodendroglial neoplasms (10 , 11) .

Another possibility is that the oncogenic events that allow oligodendrogliomas to develop (e.g., inactivation of putative tumor suppressors on 1p and 19q) are only tumorigenic in certain cells of origin or certain regions of the brain. Thus, 1p and 19q loss would facilitate tumorigenesis only in a particular cell type, which might be restricted to a certain region of the brain. Such susceptibility to neoplasia may be related to the expression pattern of a given cell type. For example, it is known that glia from different regions of the brain express varying growth factor repertoires (12) . If oncogenesis involving the putative 1p/19q pathways occurred only in cells overexpressing a specific growth factor, such tumors might arise only in particular regions of the brain. Alternatively, tumorigenesis in concert with 1p and 19q loss might be related to the extracellular environment. For example, secreted growth factors or other molecules characteristic of a particular brain region might facilitate the growth of only certain neoplastic cells, such as those with inactivation of the putative 1p/19q pathways. Such tumors might preferentially invade along tracts such as the corpus callosum and so result in bilateral tumors, as we have observed in the present report. Certainly, these data encourage further investigations into the relationship between tumor genotype and tumor site.

Regardless of the biological basis for this association, the observation already holds potential clinical relevance. At present, diagnostic testing of oligodendroglial tumors for 1p and 19q loss offers important therapeutic information for clinical patient management (3, 4, 5) . Unfortunately, such testing is not yet widely available, nor is such testing widely reimbursed by insurance companies. In addition, there are disadvantages to each of the commonly used approaches (loss of heterozygosity studies and fluorescence in situ hybridization), with no consensus on optimal methodology for clinical use. There is therefore an existing need for alternative methods of predicting oligodendroglioma behavior. We have previously noted that tumors displaying ring enhancement on neuroimaging seldom respond in a meaningful way to chemotherapy, especially PCV. 3 Thus, patients with such tumors should probably be spared the then unnecessary toxicity of the PCV regimen (3 , 5) .

The present observation that bilateral frontal oligodendrogliomas have 1p and 19q loss confirms our impression that frontal lobe oligodendrogliomas often respond to PCV therapy because, in our experience, essentially 100% of tumors with 1p and 19q loss respond to PCV (3 , 5) . In the setting of a biopsy-based diagnosis of an oligodendroglioma, the appearance of a bilateral frontal tumor on neuroimaging might therefore encourage aggressive chemotherapy in such patients, including in centers where molecular testing for 1p and 19q loss is not available at present. PCV or similar chemotherapy might be an especially attractive alternative in these cases because bilateral irradiation of the frontal lobes, the only other proven effective therapy, may be accompanied by significant neurotoxicity years after successful treatment of the tumor.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Rolando DelMaestro for valuable discussions and to Rebecca Desgroseilliers for preparing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant 37849 and NIH Grant CA57683.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should addressed, at London Regional Cancer Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, ON, Canada N6A 4L6. Phone: (519) 685-8615; Fax: (519) 685-8611; E-mail: greg.cairncross{at}lrcc.on.ca

  • ↵3 The abbreviation used is: PCV, procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine.

  • Received July 10, 2001.
  • Accepted August 1, 2001.
  • ©2001 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Cairncross J. G., Macdonald D. R. Successful chemotherapy for recurrent malignant oligodendroglioma. Ann. Neurol., 23: 360-364, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Macdonald D. R., Gaspar L. E., Cairncross J. G. Successful chemotherapy for newly diagnosed aggressive oligodendroglioma. Ann. Neurol., 27: 573-574, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Cairncross J. G., Ueki K., Zlatescu M. C., Lisle D. K., Finkelstein D. M., Hammond R. R., Silver J. S., Stark P. C., Macdonald D. R., Ramsay D. A., Louis D. N. Specific genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 90: 1473-1479, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Smith J. S., Perry A., Borell T. J., Lee H. K., O’Fallon J., Hosek S. M., Kimmel D., Yates A., Burger P. C., Scheithauer B. W., Jenkins R. B. Alterations of chromosome arms 1p and 19q as predictors of survival in oligodendrogliomas, astrocytomas, and mixed oligoastrocytomas. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 636-645, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Ino Y., Betensky R. A., Zlatescu M. C., Sasaki H., Macdonald D. R., Stemmer-Rachamimov A. O., Ramsay D. A., Cairncross J. G., Louis D. N. Molecular subtypes of anaplastic oligodendroglioma: implications for patient management at diagnosis. Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 839-845, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Bauman G. S., Ino Y., Ueki K., Zlatescu M. C., Fisher B. J., Macdonald D. R., Stitt L., Louis D. N., Cairncross J. G. Allelic loss of chromosome 1p and radiotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with oligodendrogliomas. Int. J. Rad. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 43: 825-830, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Louis D. N., von Deimling A., Seizinger B. R. A (CA)n dinucleotide repeat assay for evaluating loss of allelic heterozygosity in small and archival human brain tumor specimens. Am. J. Pathol., 141: 777-782, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Lleonart M. E., Garcia-Foncillas J., Sánchez-Prieto R., Martin P., Moreno A., Salas C., Ramón y Cajal S. Microsatellite instability and p53 mutations in sporadic right and left colon carcinoma. Cancer (Phila.), 83: 889-895, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Kakita A., Goldman J. E. Patterns and dynamics of SVZ cell migration in the postnatal forebrain: monitoring living progenitors in slice preparations. Neuron, 23: 461-472, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Dai C., Celestino J. C., Okada Y., Louis D. N., Fuller G. N., Holland E. PDGF autocrine stimulation dedifferentiates cultured astrocytes and induces oligodendrogliomas and astrocytomas from neural progenitors and astrocytes in vivo. Genes Dev., 15: 1913-1925, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Louis D. N., Holland E. C., Cairncross J. G. Glioma classification: a molecular reappraisal. Am. J. Pathol., 159: 779-786, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Gerecke K. M., Wyss J. M., Karavanova I., Buonanno A., Carroll S. L. ErbB transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors are differentially expressed throughout the adult rat central nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol., 433: 86-100, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 61 (18)
September 2001
Volume 61, Issue 18
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor Location and Growth Pattern Correlate with Genetic Signature in Oligodendroglial Neoplasms
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tumor Location and Growth Pattern Correlate with Genetic Signature in Oligodendroglial Neoplasms
Magdalena C. Zlatescu, AliReza TehraniYazdi, Hikaru Sasaki, Joseph F. Megyesi, Rebecca A. Betensky, David N. Louis and J. Gregory Cairncross
Cancer Res September 15 2001 (61) (18) 6713-6715;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tumor Location and Growth Pattern Correlate with Genetic Signature in Oligodendroglial Neoplasms
Magdalena C. Zlatescu, AliReza TehraniYazdi, Hikaru Sasaki, Joseph F. Megyesi, Rebecca A. Betensky, David N. Louis and J. Gregory Cairncross
Cancer Res September 15 2001 (61) (18) 6713-6715;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Recombinant Listeria Vaccines Containing PEST Sequences Are Potent Immune Adjuvants for the Tumor-Associated Antigen Human Papillomavirus-16 E7
  • 2-Arachidonoylglycerol
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Interleukin-2 Fusion cDNA for Cancer Gene Immunotherapy
Show more Advances in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement