Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Experimental Therapeutics

In Vitro and in Vivo Reversal of P-Glycoprotein-mediated Multidrug Resistance by a Novel Potent Modulator, XR9576

Prakash Mistry, Alistair J. Stewart, Wendy Dangerfield, Sade Okiji, Chris Liddle, Douglas Bootle, Jane A. Plumb, David Templeton and Peter Charlton
Prakash Mistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alistair J. Stewart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy Dangerfield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sade Okiji
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Liddle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas Bootle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane A. Plumb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Templeton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Charlton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published January 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Structure of XR9576.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The effect of modulators on the accumulation of[ 3H]daunorubicin by EMT6/AR1.0 cells. The cells were incubated with various concentrations of XR9576 (•), GG918 (▪), or 100 μm Vpm plus [3H]daunorubicin for 1 h before measuring cell-associated radioactivity as described in“ Materials and Methods.” Results are expressed as a percentage of that seen in the presence of 100 μm Vpm. Data plotted, the mean ± SD of quadruplicate data points.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Inhibition of Rh123 efflux from 2780AD cells by XR9576 and CsA. After a 1-h loading period in the presence of Rh123 and XR9576 at 300 nm (▪), 200 nm (▴), 100 nm (▾), and 50 nm (♦) or CsA at 20 μm (•), the cells were washed and incubated in fresh medium for the indicated times (efflux period). At the end of the efflux periods, the cell-associated Rh123 was measured as described in “Materials and Methods.”

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Effect of XR9576 on efflux of[ 3H]daunorubicin from EMT6/AR1.0 cells. EMT6/AR1.0 cells were loaded with [3H]daunorubicin in the presence or absence of the indicated concentrations of XR9576. Cells were then washed and allowed to efflux in the presence (—–) or absence (- - - -) of the modulator for the indicated time periods. Data are plotted relative to cells in the presence of XR9576 at T0. Each point, the mean of quadruplicate measurements.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Persistence of activity in EMT6/AR1.0 cells after removal of modulators from the medium. EMT6/AR1.0 cells were exposed to the modulator for 1 h, washed, and incubated in modulator-free medium for the indicated periods before the addition of[ 3H]daunorubicin and further incubation for 1 h. Cell-associated [3H]daunorubicin was measured along with the cell number as detailed in the “Materials and Methods” section. Time points, incubation period between removal of the modulator and the addition of [3H]daunorubicin for the accumulation assay. The values represent the mean of triplicate determinations.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Inhibition of [3H]azidopine labeling of P-gp by XR9576, CsA, and Vpm. Crude H69/LX4 membrane extracts were incubated with modulator and [3H]azidopine prior to UV cross-linking as described in “Materials and Methods.”[ 3H]azidopine binding to P-gp was visualized by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    A and B, effect of p.o. administration of XR9576 and GG918 on the antitumor activity of doxorubicin against the MC26 mouse colon carcinoma. Tumor slurry was implanted s.c., and 24 h later, the animals were randomized and treated once only. The modulator was administered p.o. 1 h before doxorubicin (5 mg/kg) i.v. Animals were weighed twice a week, and the tumor weight was determined on day 14 after implantation as detailed in“ Materials and Methods.” The mean tumor weights ± SE, from groups of 15–18 animals are shown. The Ps refer to comparison of doxorubicin-alone group with the combination-schedule groups. Vehicle, 5% dextrose; Dox, doxorubicin. C and D, body weights for the various treatment groups after tumor implantation.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Effect of p.o. administration of XR9576 on the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in mice bearing the sensitive A2780 ovarian carcinoma xenografts. Nude mice bearing established s.c. A2780 tumors were treated on day 0, 2, and 4 (arrows) as described in“ Materials and Methods.” The modulator was administered 2 h before the cytotoxic agent. The values represent mean ± SE of six animals per group. The growth rate of the tumor was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) by administration of paclitaxel and by paclitaxel in combination with XR9576. There was no difference in the response between these two groups.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    Restoration of paclitaxel antitumor effect on MDR 2780AD ovarian carcinoma xenografts by XR9576. Effects of p.o. (A) and i.v. (B) administration of XR9576 in combination with paclitaxel on the growth rate of the tumors. Animals bearing s.c. tumors were treated three times at 2-day intervals. Arrows, days of treatment. The modulator was administered p.o. 2 h before and i.v. 1 h before paclitaxel. The values represent mean ± SE of six animals per group. The growth rate of the tumor was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) by coadministration of XR9576 with paclitaxel compared with drug-alone or vehicle-treated groups.

  • Fig. F10-0453.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. F10-0453.

    Sensitization of etoposide antitumor effect on H69/LX4 SCLC xenografts by XR9576. Effects of p.o. (A) and i.v. (B) administration of XR9576 in combination with etoposide on the growth rate of tumors. Animals bearing s.c. tumors were treated three times at 5-day intervals. Arrows, the days of treatment. The modulator was administered p.o. 2 h before and i.v. at the same time as etoposide. Each group consisted of eight animals, and the values represent mean ± SD. The growth rate of the tumors was significantly (P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test) reduced by coadministration of XR9576, either p.o. or i.v. with etoposide compared with drug-alone or vehicle-treated groups.

  • Fig. F11-0453.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. F11-0453.

    Effect of XR9576 administered p.o. on the activity of vincristine in mice bearing H69/LX4 SCLC xenografts. Animals bearing s.c. tumors were treated 3 times at 6-day intervals. Arrows, the days of treatment. The modulator was administered 2 h before the cytotoxic agent. Each group consisted of five to seven animals. The growth rate of the tumors was significantly (P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test) reduced by administration of XR9576 with vincristine compared with cytotoxic-drug-alone or vehicle-treated groups.

  • Fig. F12-0453.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. F12-0453.

    Effect of XR9576 administration on plasma paclitaxel concentration. Male CD rats were dosed i.v. with paclitaxel alone (▪; 10 mg/kg, 15-min infusion) or with XR9576 (□; 10 mg/kg, i.v.). The modulator was administered 15 min before paclitaxel, and plasma samples were collected and analyzed by LC-MS/MS as described in the“ Materials and Methods” section. The values represent mean ± SD of three animals per group.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Sensitization of MDR cell lines to doxorubicin by XR9576, GG918, and PSC 833a

    Drug-sensitive cells
    EMT6/PH69/PA2780
    Doxorubicin IC50 (nm)
    With no modulator30.545.213
    With XR9576 100 nm549.611
    Drug-resistant cells
    EMT6/AR1.0MC26H69/LX42780AD
    Doxorubicin IC50 (nm)
    With no modulator101935.8972927.4
    With XR9576
    3 nm59825.6523.61040
    10 nm24.717.5117.473
    30 nm7.17.743.820
    50 nm7.47.242.414
    100 nm6.86.743.113
    With GG918
    3 nm484.2NDb282.1647
    10 nm3829.6116.551
    30 nm9.21745.518
    50 nm7.810.443.414
    100 nm7.17.643.114
    With PSC 833
    50 nm89.225.4444.3678
    100 nm40.220.4233.8627
    300 nm30.58.35858
    500 nm287.936.828
    1000 nm26.9ND41.113c
    • aThe values represent results from a single potentiation assay performed in quadruplicate wells as described in “Materials and Methods” and is representative of at least three separate experiments.

    • b ND, not done.

    • c Toxic, modulator alone inhibited cell growth by >10% of control value.

  • Table 2

    Potency of XR9576 and GG918 in enhancing cytotoxicity of various drugs in MDR cell linesa

    Cytotoxic drugModulator EC50b (nm) for potentiating cytotoxicity
    EMT6/AR1.0H69/LX42780AD
    XR9576GG918XR9576GG918XR9576GG918
    Doxorubicin15 ± 220 ± 616 ± 526 ± 2120 ± 332 ± 18
    Vincristine22c36c38 ± 334d30 ± 1049d
    Paclitaxel12d35d22 ± 1663d34 ± 1051d
    Colchicine17 ± 1114 ± 1018 ± 134 ± 5NDeND
    Actinomycin D12 ± 928 ± 1334 ± 1634 ± 6NDND
    Etoposide14d19d18 ± 1044 ± 22NDND
    • a Values are mean ± SD, where n ≥ 3 separate experiments except where indicated.

    • b Concentration of modulator required to reverse resistance to cytotoxic drug by 50%. For method see “Drug Potentiation Assay” section in “Material and Methods.”

    • c Value from a single experiment.

    • d Mean values from two experiments.

    • e ND, not determined.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 61 (2)
January 2001
Volume 61, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro and in Vivo Reversal of P-Glycoprotein-mediated Multidrug Resistance by a Novel Potent Modulator, XR9576
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Vitro and in Vivo Reversal of P-Glycoprotein-mediated Multidrug Resistance by a Novel Potent Modulator, XR9576
Prakash Mistry, Alistair J. Stewart, Wendy Dangerfield, Sade Okiji, Chris Liddle, Douglas Bootle, Jane A. Plumb, David Templeton and Peter Charlton
Cancer Res January 1 2001 (61) (2) 749-758;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Vitro and in Vivo Reversal of P-Glycoprotein-mediated Multidrug Resistance by a Novel Potent Modulator, XR9576
Prakash Mistry, Alistair J. Stewart, Wendy Dangerfield, Sade Okiji, Chris Liddle, Douglas Bootle, Jane A. Plumb, David Templeton and Peter Charlton
Cancer Res January 1 2001 (61) (2) 749-758;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Phosphatidylinositol 3′-Kinase Is Required for Growth of Mast Cells Expressing the Kit Catalytic Domain Mutant
  • Antitumor Effect by Interleukin-11 Receptor α-Locus Chemokine/CCL27, Introduced into Tumor Cells through a Recombinant Adenovirus Vector
  • Mammary Carcinoma Suppression by Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein-II
Show more Experimental Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement