Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Advances in Brief

Telomere Length Abnormalities in Mammalian Radiosensitive Cells

Joanne McIlrath, Simon D. Bouffler, Enrique Samper, Andrew Cuthbert, Andrzej Wojcik, Irena Szumiel, Peter E. Bryant, Andrew C. Riches, Alastair Thompson, Maria A. Blasco, Robert F. Newbold and Predrag Slijepcevic
Joanne McIlrath
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon D. Bouffler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrique Samper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Cuthbert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrzej Wojcik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irena Szumiel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter E. Bryant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew C. Riches
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alastair Thompson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria A. Blasco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert F. Newbold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Predrag Slijepcevic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published February 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Telomere lengths in radiosensitive murine lymphoma cells L5178Y-S and parental radioresistant L5178Y cells were measured by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results revealed a 7-fold reduction in telomere length in radiosensitive cells (7 kb) in comparison with radioresistant cells (48 kb). Therefore, it was reasoned that telomere length might be used as a marker for chromosomal radiosensitivity. In agreement with this hypothesis, a significant inverse correlation between telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity was observed in lymphocytes from 24 breast cancer patients and 5 normal individuals. In contrast, no chromosomal radiosensitivity was observed in mouse cell lines that showed shortened telomeres, possibly reflecting differences in radiation responses between primary cells and established cell lines. Telomere length abnormalities observed in radiosensitive cells suggest that these two phenotypes may be linked.

Introduction

Telomeres are essential functional elements of the eukaryotic chromosomes responsible for chromosome stability maintenance (1) . In yeast, telomeres play a role in cellular responses to DNA-damaging agents such as IR, 3 a potent inducer of DNA DSBs. DSB repair proteins, including Ku, are permanently present at yeast telomeres (2) , and they relocate to the site of DSB after exposure to IR (3 , 4) . Although it is not clear whether telomeres have the same role in other organisms, several lines of evidence indirectly link telomere maintenance and cellular response to IR in organisms as diverse as Caenorhabditis elegans and humans (see below). The first line of evidence is provided by the studies involving the human genetic disorders AT and NBS. AT patients show sensitivity to IR, a high incidence of cancer (5) , and a number of telomere-associated defects (6, 7, 8) . Similarly, NBS cells are radiosensitive, and the NBS protein is present at telomeres (9) . The second line of evidence is provided by mouse studies. Radiosensitive severe combined immunodeficiency mice deficient in DNA-PK, an enzyme complex consisting of Ku and DNA-PK catalytic subunit that is involved in V(D)J recombination and DSB repair, have abnormally long telomeres and a high frequency of TFs (10 , 11) . Similarly, radiosensitive Ku-deficient mice have a defect in telomere function as shown by high incidence of TF (12) . In addition, mice deficient in PARP are radiosensitive (13) and show telomere shortening accompanied by TF (14) . The third line of evidence is provided by a study of the C. elegans cell cycle checkpoint mutant, mrt-2. This mutant has critically short telomeres and high levels of TF, and it is hypersensitive to IR (15) . Taken together, these observations point to the possibility that telomeres may play a role in cellular, or even organismal, responses to IR. To test this possibility more directly, we examined chromosomal radiosensitivity and telomere length in normal mouse cells, in mouse lymphoma cell lines, and in human lymphocytes originating from breast cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Tissue Culture.

All cells were grown under standard tissue culture conditions. LY-R and LY-S cells were grown in the Fischer’s medium, CB17 in Waymouth’s medium, and 3T3 in DMEM. All media were supplemented with FCS (10%) and antibiotics. Mouse splenocytes were obtained from BALB/c and SWR mice, and mitogen-stimulated (2μ g/ml−1 concanavalin A and 25μ g/ml1 lipopolysacchaide) cultures in RPMI 1640/20% FCS were set up as described (16) . Human lymphocytes were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin and grown for 72 h in RPMI 1640.

Chromosome Radiosensitivity Tests.

Four different tests were used: (a) chromosome painting for scoring translocations; (b) classical cytogenetic analysis for scoring dicentric chromosomes; (c) the MN test; and (d) the G2 assay for scoring chromatid breaks and gaps induced in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. For the first three tests, dose-response relationships were established using doses of 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 Gy of γ rays. For the G2 assay, doses varying from 0.2 Gy to 1.0 Gy were used, depending upon the cell type used. Chromosome painting was performed according to the instructions supplied by the manufacturer of mouse chromosome paints, Cambio. A Leica fluorescence microscope was used to observe painted chromosomes. Classical cytogenetic analysis involved the staining of metaphase figures with Giemsa and scoring dicentric chromosomes using light microscopy. Similarly, for the G2 assay, chromosomes were stained with Giemsa and observed by using light microscopy. The MN test was performed according to the original protocol (17) , and micronuclei were scored using light microscopy. Irradiation was carried out either with a 137Cs irradiator (CIS International) for the G2 assay on human lymphocytes, or a 60Co source for the tests involving mouse cells. Dose rates were 4.0 Gy/min and 0.25 Gy/min, respectively.

Q-FISH and Telomerase Detection.

Metaphase spreads were hybridized with the PNA telomeric oligonucleotide (CCCTTA)3 labeled with Cy3 (PE Biosystems) as described (18) . Digital images were acquired using a Leica fluorescence microscope coupled with a Photometrics cooled CCD camera and Smart Capture software (Vysis). Telomere fluorescence intensity was analyzed using TFL-Telo software provided by Dr. Peter Lansdorp and Dr. Steven S. S. Poon (Terry Fox Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Telomere fluorescence intensity was expressed in TFUs according to a procedure described previously (18) . One TFU corresponds to 1 kb of telomere length (18) . At least 15 metaphase cells/sample were analyzed in Q-FISH experiments. Telomerase activity was measured using the telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay.

Results

Chromosomal Radiosensitivity and Telomere Length in Mouse Lymphoma Cells.

The mouse lymphoma LY-S cell strain was the first reported mammalian strain exhibiting a marked sensitivity to IR (19) . This strain was isolated from the parental radio-resistant lymphoma strain, LY-R, after spontaneous transformation in vitro (19) . The radiosensitivity of LY-S cells results from a deficiency in DSB repair (20) . However, the major mammalian DSB repair protein, DNA-PK, is functional in both strains 4 , and the exact nature of DSB repair deficiency in LY-S cells remains unknown.

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between cellular response to IR and telomere length. To monitor cellular response to IR, four chromosomal radiosensitivity tests were used (see “Materials and Methods”). In agreement with results published previously (21) , all tests confirmed that LY-S cells are significantly more radiosensitive than parental LY-R cells (not shown).

To analyze telomere length in these cells, Q-FISH (10 , 18) was used because conventional telomere measurements by Southern analysis may not be reliable in mouse cells (22) . The average telomere length in DBA mice from which LY-R cells had been isolated is ∼40 kb (18) . Telomeres in parental radio-resistant LY-R cells were 48 kb long (Fig. 1A and C) ⇓ . In contrast, telomeres in radiosensitive LY-S cells were severely shortened, exhibiting an average length of 7.1 kb (Fig. 1, B and C) ⇓ . Some chromosomes in LY-S cells lacked telomeric signals (see below), suggesting that telomeric sequences have been completely lost or are below the resolution of Q-FISH, i.e., 200 bp.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Telomere length and telomerase activity in mouse lymphoma cells. A, metaphase chromosomes from an LY-R cell (counterstain DAPI; telomere signal Cy3). B, metaphase chromosomes from an LY-S cell. C, average telomere length in LY-R and LY-S cells determined by Q-FISH. The difference in telomere length between LY-R and LY-S is statistically significant (t test; P < 0.001). D, telomerase activity in LY-R and LY-S cells. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were used as control. Cell extracts were pretreated (+) or not (−) with RNase. Protein concentration used is indicated. An internal control (IC) for PCR efficiency was included.

The analysis of telomerase activity in LY-S and LY-R cells indicated that both strains express telomerase at similar levels (Fig. 1D) ⇓ . Analysis of the telomerase catalytic subunit and telomerase RNA component expression also failed to reveal differences between the strains (not shown). This suggests that the difference in average telomere lengths between cell strains is not attributable to differences in telomerase activity. Monitoring of telomere length in both LY-S and LY-R cells for ∼50 mean population doublings revealed that the average telomere length (Fig. 1C) ⇓ remains stable (not shown). The origin of the shortened telomeres in LY-S cells is unknown and is currently under investigation.

Telomere Length and Chromosomal Radiosensitivity in Lymphocytes from Breast Cancer Patients.

The above results, together with observations of shortened telomeres in yku80 mutants, human AT cells, PARP-deficient mice, or C. elegans mrt2 mutant (see “Introduction”), suggest that short telomeres may be associated with cellular and/or chromosomal radiosensitivity. To investigate this possibility further, chromosomal radiosensitivity was assessed in lymphocytes from 24 breast cancer patients and 5 normal donors using the G2 assay. Lymphocytes were exposed to 0.4 Gy γ rays, and frequencies of chromatid breaks and gaps, generated in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, were determined. Telomere length was measured by Q-FISH in control nonirradiated samples from the same donors. The data (Fig. 2) ⇓ show an inverse correlation between telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity in this group of patients. The correlation is statistically significant (r = 0.503; see Fig. 2 ⇓ legend). A similar correlation has also been observed between telomere length and patient age 5 . However, this correlation is weaker than the correlation between telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity. There was no correlation between radiosensitivity and donor age (not shown).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity in 24 breast cancer patients and 5 normal individuals (expressed as numbers of breaks and gaps/100 cells; sampling time, 3 h after irradiation; dose, 0.4 Gy) and telomere length, estimated by Q-FISH, expressed in TFUs. The difference in average telomere length between the 24 breast cancer cases and the 5 normal individuals was not statistically significant, and consequently all samples were pooled together. A correlation analysis revealed a significant inverse correlation between chromosomal radiosensitivity and telomere length (Pearsonχ 2 test, P < 0.01; Kendall’s τ test, P < 0.05; and Spearman’s ρ test, P < 0.05). Donors’ ranged between 26 and 87 years of age. The age range of normal individuals was similar to that of breast cancer patients.

Selecting Normal Mouse Cells with Different Telomere Lengths.

To investigate whether short telomeres in themselves confer chromosomal radiosensitivity, mouse cell lines that show short telomeres as the only obvious defect were selected together with primary cells from corresponding genetic backgrounds as controls. An alternative approach, i.e., initiating primary somatic cell culture, propagating it until telomeres become critically short, and comparing the effects in primary versus senescent cells, was not practical because of ultra-long telomeres and the presence of telomerase activity in mouse cells (22) . Furthermore, the range of changes associated with cellular senescence would have made interpretation difficult.

An earlier study has revealed shortened telomeres in the CB17 cell line (10) . The CB17 inbred strain from which this cell line originated is essentially BALB/c in its characteristics and genetic composition, although a small element of C57BL is present in the strain’s genome (23) . This cell line expresses telomerase 6 and has no obvious phenotypic defect. Q-FISH revealed that telomere length in this cell line is, on average, 11 kb (Fig. 3A) ⇓ . Some chromosomes in CB17 cells lacked telomeric signals completely (Fig. 3B) ⇓ and were involved in TF (10) . The proportion of chromosomes lacking telomeric signals was comparable with that in LY-S cells (Fig. 3B) ⇓ . BALB/c mouse splenocytes were selected as corresponding primary control cells because of their suitability for obtaining the metaphase spreads required for Q-FISH as well as subsequent radiation experiments that require short term in vitro culture (see “Materials and Methods”). The analysis of telomere length in primary splenocytes obtained from a BALB/c mouse revealed a normal telomere length of ∼50 kb (Fig. 3A) ⇓ . As expected, all chromosomes in BALB/c splenocytes showed strong telomeric signals (Fig. 3B) ⇓ and lacked TFs (not shown).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Telomere length (A) and frequencies of chromosomes without detectable telomeric signal (B) in mouse cell lines. C/M, chromosomes/metaphase lacking telomeric signals. At least 10 metaphases/cell line were analyzed for determining C/M.

The mouse 3T3 cell line (derived from a Swiss mouse) shows shortened telomeres that are 7 kb on average (Fig. 3A) ⇓ . These cells also show TF because of a complete loss of telomeres in some chromosomes (Fig. 3B) ⇓ . Splenocytes from SWR, an inbred Swiss mouse strain, were used as a control for 3T3. The average telomere length in splenocytes obtained from a SWR mouse was 80 kb (Fig. 3A) ⇓ . All chromosomes in SWR splenocytes showed strong telomeric signals (Fig. 3B) ⇓ . The difference between telomere lengths in cell lines and corresponding primary splenocytes was statistically significant in all cases (t test; P < 0.0001).

Chromosomal Radiosensitivity of Mouse Cells with Differing Telomere Length.

The response to IR was monitored in the above cell lines and in corresponding primary splenocytes using four chromosome radiosensitivity tests (Fig. 4) ⇓ . None of the tests revealed statistically significant differences in response to IR between mouse cells with short telomeres and corresponding genetically normal cells (Fig. 4) ⇓ . In some cases, frequencies of chromosome damage were slightly higher in cells with longer telomeres (Fig. 4C) ⇓ . Comparison of sensitivity to IR in BALB/c and SWR cells did not reveal any statistically significant difference either (Fig. 4) ⇓ , although these two types of mice are genetically different and have different telomere lengths (Fig. 3A) ⇓ . Therefore, these results suggest that short telomeres and chromosomal radiosensitivity are not always associated.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Chromosome radiosensitivity in mouse cell lines and corresponding primary cells from the same genetic backgrounds. A, frequencies of dicentric (Dic) chromosomes. B, frequencies of translocations (T) involving chromosomes 2 and 11, identified by chromosome painting. C, G2 assay. Note that in the G2 assay, the frequency of chromatid breaks and gaps (B/G) declines with time after irradiation (dose used was 1.0 Gy). D, MN test. In all cases, at least two independent experiments were performed. In each experiment, at least 100 cells/point were analyzed. Results presented are the means from two experiments and are expressed on a per-cell basis. Statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences in response to IR between different cell types.

Discussion

Many radiosensitive eukaryotic cells show defects in telomere maintenance. Most defects involve severe telomere shortening as exemplified by the yku70-deficient yeast (2) , the C. elegans mrt2 mutant (15) , human AT cells (6) , and PARP-deficient mice (14) . The analysis of radiosensitive LY-S mouse lymphoma cells presented here revealed a 7-fold reduction in telomere length as compared with parental cells (Fig. 1) ⇓ . LY-S cells have a defect in DSB repair (21) despite functional DNA-PK 7 . Although telomerase activity is normal in both LY-R and LY-S cells (Fig. 1D) ⇓ , telomere length in LY-S cells (Fig. 1C) ⇓ is comparable with that of late-generation telomerase-null mice (22) , whereas parental LY-R cells have normal telomere length (Fig. 1C) ⇓ . Telomere length is maintained at these levels in both LY-S and parental LY-R cells for at least 50 mean population doublings (see “Results”), suggesting that gradual telomere shortening may not be responsible for the loss of telomeric sequences in LY-S cells. It seems more likely that a fast and severe telomere shortening may coincide with the transformation of the radioresistant LY-R phenotype into the radiosensitive LY-S phenotype. Observation of accelerated telomere shortening in radiosensitive AT cells (6) and the finding that other radiosensitive eukaryotic cells show severely shortened telomeres (2 , 14 , 15) support this possibility.

On the basis of these observations, it was reasoned that telomere length might be used as a marker for chromosomal radiosensitivity. An inverse significant correlation between telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity in lymphocytes from breast cancer patients (Fig. 2) ⇓ seems to support this hypothesis. Taken together, these data suggest that telomere length may be used as a potential diagnostic marker for detecting chromosomal radiosensitivity. There is a good correlation between G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity and predisposition to breast cancer (24) . It will be of interest to analyze telomere length and telomere maintenance mechanisms in a larger number of breast cancer cases and in other types of cancer with the purpose of testing the above hypothesis more rigorously.

However, the analysis of mouse cell lines with short telomeres as the only obvious defect failed to confirm the correlation between telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity. Thus, short telomeres in themselves may not necessarily confer chromosomal radiosensitivity in vitro, at least in the case of acute γ-radiation exposure. Alternatively, telomeres in CB17 and 3T3 cells may not have been sufficiently shortened to significantly affect cellular response to IR. However, judging by similar frequencies of chromosomes without telomeres in LY-S, CB17, and 3T3 cells and subsequent formation of TF, indicative of the impairment of telomere function, this seems unlikely (Fig. 2) ⇓ . Also, it is possible that in established cell lines, mechanisms that confer radiosensitivity may be different from those in normal primary cells. For, example, severe telomere shortening causes a p53-mediated apoptotic response (25) . Established mouse cell lines usually lose either p53 or p19ARF (26) , and this could affect cellular radiation response by tolerating short telomeres. In addition, it should be noted that cell type (splenocyte/fibroblast) also may be influencing chromosomal radiosensitivity.

In conclusion, the observations presented here suggest that telomere length and chromosomal radiosensitivity are inversely correlated in some cases. This may reflect common pathways in DNA metabolism that affect both phenotypes. Additional research is required to exploit the potential clinical application of our finding.

Note Added in Proof

Two recent papers show the link between telomeres and radiosensitivity. Wong et al. Nat. Genet., 26:85–88, 2000 and Goytisolo et al. J. Exp. Med., 192: 1625–1636, 2000.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by grants from the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research (radiation program) and EUROATOM Grants FIGH-CT1999-00011 and FIGH-CT1999-00009 from the European Union (to P. S.). M. A. B.’s laboratory is funded by the Swiss Bridge Award 2000, Grants PM97-0133 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Spain, 08.1/0030/98 from CAM, EURATOM/991/0201, and FIGH-CT-1999-00002 from the European Union and the Department of Immunology and Oncology. A. W. and I. S. are supported by a grant from the Stiftung fuer Deutsch-Polnische Zusammenarbeit.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Biological Sciences, Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 1895 274 000, extension 2109; Fax: 44 1895 274 348; E-mail: predrag.Slijepcevic{at}brunel.ac.uk

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: IR, ionizing radiation; DSB, double-strand breaks; AT, ataxia telangiectasia; NBS, Nijmegen breakage syndrome; TF, telomeric fusion; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; LY-R, L5178Y cells; LY-S, L5178Y-S; MN, micronucleus test; Q-FISH, quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization; TFU, telomere fluorescence unit.

  • ↵4 Sochanowich and Szumiel, manuscript in preparation

  • ↵5 J. McIlrath and P. Slijepcevic, unpublished observations.

  • ↵6 P. Slijepcevic, unpublished results.

  • ↵7 Sochanowicz and I. Szumiel, manuscript in preparation.

  • Received September 8, 2000.
  • Accepted December 11, 2000.
  • ©2001 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Zakian V. Telomeres: beginning to understand the end.. Science (Washington DC), 270: 1601-1607, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Boulton S. J., Jackson S. P. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomere maintenance.. Nucleic Acids Res., 24: 4639-4648, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Mills K. D., Sinclair A., Guarente L. MEC1-dependent redistribution of the Sir3 silencing protein from telomeres to DNA double-strand breaks.. Cell, 97: 609-629, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Martin S. G., Laroche T., Suka N., Grunstein M., Gasser S. M. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast.. Cell, 97: 621-633, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bridges, B. A., and Harnden, D. G. Ataxia telangiectasia: a cellular and molecular link between cancer, neuropathology, and immune deficiency. Chichester, England: John Wiley, 1982.
  6. ↵
    Metcalfe J. A., Parkhill J., Campbell L., Stacey M., Biggs P., Byrd P. J., Taylor M. R. Accelerated telomere shortening in ataxia telangiectasia.. Nat. Genet., 4: 252-255, 1996.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Smilenov L., Dhar S., Pandita T. K. Altered telomere nuclear matrix interactions and nucleosomal periodicity in ataxia telangiectasia cells before and after ionizing radiation treatment.. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 6963-6971, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Pandita T. K., Westphal C. H., Anger M., Sawant S. G., Geard C. R., Pandita R. K., Scherthan H. Atm inactivation results in aberrant telomere clustering during meiotic prophase.. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 5096-5105, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Lombard D. B., Guarente L. Nijmegen breakage syndrome disease protein and MRE11 at PML nuclear bodies and meiotic telomeres.. Cancer Res., 60: 2331-2334, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Slijepcevic P., Hande M. P., Bouffler S. D., Lansdorp P., Bryant P. E. Telomere length, chromatin structure, and chromosome fusigenic potential.. Chromosoma (Berl.), 106: 413-421, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Hande P., Slijepcevic P., Silver A., Bouffler S., van Buul P., Bryant P., Lansdorp P. Elongated telomeres in scid mice. Genomics, 56: 221-223, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Bailey S. M., Meyne J., Chen D. J., Kurimasa A., Li G. C., Lehnert B. E., Goodwin E. H. DNA double-strand break repair proteins are required to cap the ends of mammalian chromosomes.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 14899-14904, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Wang Z-Q., Auer B., Stingl L., Berghammer H., Haidacher D., Schweiger M., Wagner E. F. Mice lacking ADPRT and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation develop normally but are susceptible to skin disease.. Genes Dev., 9: 509-520, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    d’Adda di Fagagna F., Hande M. P., Tong W. M., Lansdorp P. M., Wang Z. Q., Jackson S. P. Functions of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in controlling telomere length and chromosomal stability. Nat. Genet., 23: 76-80, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Ahmed S., Hodgkin J. MRT-2 checkpoint protein is required for germline immortality and telomere replication in C. elegans. Nature (Lond.), 403: 159-164, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Bouffler S. D., Kemp C. J., Balmain A., Cox R. Spontaneous and ionizing radiation-induced chromosomal abnormalities in p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res., 55: 3883-3889, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Fenech M., Morley A. A. Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.. Mutat. Res., 147: 29-36, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Zijlmans J. M., Martens U. M., Poon S. S. S., Raap A. K., Tanke H. J., Ward R. K., Lansdorp P. M. Telomeres in the mouse have large interchromosomal variations in the number of T2AG3 repeats.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 7423-7428, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Alexander P., Mikulski Z. B. Mouse lymphoma cells with different radiosensitivities.. Nature (Lond.), 192: 572-573, 1961.
  20. ↵
    Wlodek D., Hittelman W. N. The repair of double strand breaks correlates with radiosensitivity of L5178Y-S and L5178Y-R cells.. Radiat. Res., 115: 566-575, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    Beer J. Z., Budzicka E., Niepokojczycka E., Rosiek O., Szumiel I., Walicka M. Loss of tumorigenicity with simultaneous changes in radiosensitivity and photosensitivity during in vitro growth of L5178Y murine lymphoma cells.. Cancer Res., 43: 4736-4742, 1983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Blasco M. A., Lee H., Hande M. P., Samper E., Lansdorp P. M., DePinho R. A., Greider C. W. Telomere shortening and tumor formation by mouse cells lacking telomerase RNA.. Cell, 91: 25-34, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Festing, M. W. F. Origins and characteristics of inbred strains of mice. In: M. F. Lyon, S. Rastan, and S. D. M. Brown (eds.), Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse, Vol. 2, pp. 1537–1576, 1996.
  24. ↵
    Scott D., Spreadborough A., Levine E., Roberts S. A. Genetic predisposition in breast cancer.. Lancet, 344: 1444 1994.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Chin L., Artandi S. E., Shen Q., Tam A., Lee S., Gottlieb G. J., Greider C. W., DePinho R. A. p53 deficiency rescues the adverse effects of telomere loss and cooperates with telomere dysfunction to accelerate carcinogenesis. Cell, 97: 527-538,
  26. ↵
    Kamiko T., Zindy F., Roussel M. F., Quelle D. E., Downing J. R., Ashmun R. A., Grosveld G., Sherr C. Tumor supression at the mouse INK4a locus mediated by alternative reading frame product p19ARF.. Cell, 91: 649-659, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 61 (3)
February 2001
Volume 61, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Telomere Length Abnormalities in Mammalian Radiosensitive Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Telomere Length Abnormalities in Mammalian Radiosensitive Cells
Joanne McIlrath, Simon D. Bouffler, Enrique Samper, Andrew Cuthbert, Andrzej Wojcik, Irena Szumiel, Peter E. Bryant, Andrew C. Riches, Alastair Thompson, Maria A. Blasco, Robert F. Newbold and Predrag Slijepcevic
Cancer Res February 2 2001 (61) (3) 912-915;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Telomere Length Abnormalities in Mammalian Radiosensitive Cells
Joanne McIlrath, Simon D. Bouffler, Enrique Samper, Andrew Cuthbert, Andrzej Wojcik, Irena Szumiel, Peter E. Bryant, Andrew C. Riches, Alastair Thompson, Maria A. Blasco, Robert F. Newbold and Predrag Slijepcevic
Cancer Res February 2 2001 (61) (3) 912-915;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Note Added in Proof
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • NIMA-Related Protein Kinase 1 Is Involved Early in the Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Response
  • Conditional Expression of K-ras in an Epithelial Compartment that Includes the Stem Cells Is Sufficient to Promote Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis
  • Crucial Role of Phospholipase Cε in Chemical Carcinogen-Induced Skin Tumor Development
Show more Advances in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement