Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Clinical Investigations

Detection of Blood-borne Cells in Colorectal Cancer Patients by Nested Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Messenger RNA

Longitudinal Analyses and Demonstration of Its Potential Importance as an Adjunct to Multiple Serum Markers

Fiorella Guadagni, Judith Kantor, Simona Aloe, Maria Daniela Carone, Antonella Spila, Roberta D’Alessandro, Maria Rosaria Abbolito, Maurizio Cosimelli, Franco Graziano, Fabio Carboni, Sandro Carlini, Pasquale Perri, Francesco Sciarretta, John W. Greiner, Syed V. S. Kashmiri, Seth M. Steinberg, Mario Roselli and Jeffrey Schlom
Fiorella Guadagni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Kantor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simona Aloe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Daniela Carone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonella Spila
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberta D’Alessandro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Rosaria Abbolito
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Cosimelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franco Graziano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Carboni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandro Carlini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pasquale Perri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Sciarretta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Greiner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Syed V. S. Kashmiri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seth M. Steinberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mario Roselli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Schlom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published March 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Optimization of the sensitivity and specificity of the RT-PCR assay for CEA mRNA. A, improvement in RT-PCR sensitivity using different amounts of total RNA. Agarose gel electrophoresis of CEA RT-PCR amplification products from peripheral blood cells of three different metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients when cDNA was synthesized using either 5 μg (Lanes 1–3) or 1 μg (Lanes 4–6) of total RNA. Lane 7, cDNA negative control. Arrow, 131-bp CEA band. M, 100-bp DNA ladder (also seen in B–D). B, evaluation of two different blood samples obtained at days 7 and 1 prior to surgery, using two different blood volumes from the same colorectal cancer patient. Lane 1, MC38(CEA) cell line. Lane 2, MC38 cell line. Lanes 3 and 4, 15 and 7 ml of blood, respectively, from a colorectal cancer patient 7 days prior to surgery. Lanes 5 and 6, 15 and 7 ml of blood, respectively, from the same patient 1 day prior to surgery. Lane 7, cDNA negative control. C, evaluation of the specificity of the RT-PCR reaction. Lane 1, MC38(CEA) cells expressing CEA. Lanes 2 and 3, MC38 and MC38(NCA), respectively. Lanes 4–11 (and Lanes 1–11 in D), blood samples from 19 different, apparently healthy donors.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Relationship between CEA RT-PCR results and CEA serum levels and CEA expression in tumor tissue. A, modest overall association between serum CEA levels and RT-PCR analysis for CEA in the blood of colorectal cancer patients. [P2 = 0.11, comparing four groups as shown; P2 = 0.02 comparing (+) versus (−)]. B, strong relationship between CEA expression in tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR analysis for CEA in the blood of colorectal cancer patients (P2 = 0.0041). NEG, negative.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Summary of CEA RT-PCR results in blood samples from apparently healthy volunteers and patients with benign or malignant colorectal disease

    No. of casesNo. of positive casesaNo. of borderline positive (+/−) casesaNo. of negative cases
    Series I
     Donors
      1 μg of RNA200020
      2 μg of RNA200020
      5 μg of RNA200020
     Patients
      1 μg of RNA203 (15)017
      2 μg of RNA207 (35)013
      5 μg of RNA2015 (75)05
    Series IIb
     Donorsc4002 (5.0)38 (95.0)
     Patients
      Benign180018 (100.0)
      Malignant5134 (66.7)1 (2.0)16 (31.4)
    • a Numbers in parentheses represent percentages.

    • b 5 μg of RNA were used for all series II samples.

    • c Donors are apparently healthy individuals, as described in “Materials and Methods.”

  • Table 2

    RT-PCR results and serum tumor marker levels in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients

    Serum CEA levels were determined by an enzyme immunoassay test kit, using a value of 5 ng/ml as positive. CA19.9 was determined using the CA19.9 kit with the suggested value 37 units/ml as positive. Serum CA72-4 antigen levels were determined using the CA72-4 kit with the suggested value 6 units/ml as positive.
    PatientSite of primaryStageSite of metastasisSerum levelsCEA RT-PCR
    CEA (ng/ml)CA19.9 (units/ml)CA72-4 (units/ml)
    1ColonA2.9 (−)8.0 (−)1.7 (−)−
    2RectumA1.4 (−)39.9 (+)10.0 (+)+++
    3RectumA0.8 (−)3.7 (−)0.1 (−)−
    4ColonA0.6 (−)25.6 (−)1.9 (−)++
    5ColonA0.6 (−)12.2 (−)2.1 (−)−
    6ColonA0.5 (−)15.3 (−)1.4 (−)−
    7RectumB13.0 (−)6.2 (−)1.8 (−)++
    8RectumB12.8 (−)30.9 (−)0.7 (−)++
    9RectumB12.7 (−)4.8 (−)2.0 (−)−
    10RectumB12.1 (−)7.0 (−)1.9 (−)−
    11SigmaB111.5 (+)8.3 (−)0.9 (−)+
    12RectumB10.9 (−)15.8 (−)2.2 (−)−
    13Colon/RectumB1a1.7 (−)8.7 (−)2.4 (−)++
    14ColonB277.3 (+)40.0 (+)22.9 (+)++
    15SigmaB23.1 (−)9.3 (−)4.5 (−)+++
    16RectumB21.8 (−)7.4 (−)12.5 (+)+
    17RectumB21.7 (−)7.3 (−)2.1 (−)+
    18RectumB21.4 (−)4.0 (−)0.8 (−)−
    19RectumB21.1 (−)8.1 (−)1.8 (−)+
    20ColonB20.4 (−)18.3 (−)3.4 (−)−
    21ColonB20.2 (−)2.2 (−)3.0 (−)−
    22RectumC16.2 (+)12.7 (−)1.8 (−)+
    23RectumC11.0 (−)12.1 (−)2.3 (−)+
    24ColonC10.5 (−)8.9 (−)2.0 (−)+
    25SigmaC216.1 (+)0.1 (−)1.6 (−)−
    26ColonC25.6 (+)0.4 (−)0.4 (−)++
    27ColonC21.2 (−)87.1 (+)18.5 (+)++
    28RectumC20.8 (−)6.2 (−)2.3 (−)+
    29RectumC20.6 (−)11.8 (−)2.8 (−)+++
    30ColonDLiver433.5 (+)1364.2 (+)18.9 (+)+
    31ColonDLiver311.6 (+)6490.1 (+)31.3 (+)+++
    32ColonDLiver257.4 (+)44.7 (+)65.3 (+)+
    33SigmaDLiver139.0 (+)963.0 (+)151.9 (+)−
    34ColonDMultiple126.2 (+)53.4 (+)2.6 (−)+
    35CecumDLiver20.5 (+)75.8 (+)0.7 (−)+
    36RectumDPeritoneum20.0 (+)238.6 (+)15.5 (+)+
    37ColonDLiver13.5 (+)84.6 (+)22.5 (+)+++
    38RectumDLiver10.2 (+)2.0 (−)0.1 (−)+++
    39ColonDPeritoneum8.7 (+)1.7 (−)3.8 (−)+
    40RectumDLung-Liver5.0 (+)43.4 (+)2.0 (−)+
    41RectumDLiver4.7 (−)25.7 (−)1.6 (−)+
    42ColonDLiver4.2 (−)34.9 (−)0.1 (−)+
    43RectumDLiver2.1 (−)8.3 (−)2.8 (−)−
    44ColonDMultiple1.5 (−)99.5 (+)22.7 (+)−
    45ColonDLiver1.5 (−)148.3 (+)10.2 (+)−
    46SigmaDLiver1.0 (−)0.4 (−)0.3 (−)++
    47SigmaRECbLocoreg.278.1 (+)25.5 (−)1.9 (−)+
    48RectumRECLocoreg.47.4 (+)124.2 (+)3.9 (−)+
    49RectumRECLocoreg.3.9 (−)9.8 (−)2.0 (−)+
    50RectumRECLocoreg.3.1 (−)13.4 (−)1.9 (−)−
    51ColonRECLocoreg.0.9 (−)127.3 (+)104.4 (+)+
    • a Synchronous adenocarcinomas of the right colon and rectum.

    • b REC, recurrent; Locoreg, locoregional.

  • Table 3

    Detection of CEA-specific mRNA by nested RT-PCR in peripheral blood cells vs. serum marker levels of colorectal cancer patients

    StageNo. of patientsNo. of patients positive fora
    CEA RT-PCRSerum CEAAny of the three serum markersbAny of the three serum markers and RT-PCRCEA RT-PCR and negative by all three serum markersAny of the three serum markers and/or RT-PCR
    A62 (33.3)0 (0.0)1 (16.7)1 (16.7)1 (16.7)2 (33.3)
    B159 (60.0)2 (13.3)3 (20.0)3 (20.0)6 (40.0)9 (60.0)
    C87 (87.5)3 (37.5)4 (50.0)3 (37.5)4 (50.0)8 (100.0)
    D1713 (76.5)11 (64.7)13 (76.5)10 (58.8)3 (17.6)16 (94.1)
    Locoregional recurrence54 (80.0)2 (40.0)3 (60.0)3 (60.0)1 (20.0)4 (80.0)
    Total5135 (68.3)18 (35.3)24 (47.1)20 (39.2)15 (29.4)39 (76.5)
    • a Values in parentheses are percentages.

    • b CEA, CA19.9, CA72-4.

  • Table 4

    Correlation between RT-PCR results and tissue CEA expression in colorectal cancer patients

    Patients diagnosed withPatientSite of primary tumorStageSite of metastasisSerum CEA (ng/ml)CEA RT-PCRTissue CEA expressiona (%)
    Primary nonmetastatic cancer2RectumA1.4 (−)+++85 (++)
    7RectumB13.0 (−)++40 (+++)
    8RectumB12.8 (−)++>90 (++)
    9RectumB12.7 (−)−10 (+)
    12RectumB10.9 (−)−25 (+)
    13Colon & rectumB1b1.7 (−)++70 (+++)
    14SigmaB22.3 (−)+++>90 (+++)
    17RectumB21.7 (−)+50 (++)
    19RectumB21.1 (−)+>90 (+++)
    20ColonB20.4 (−)−65 (++)
    21ColonB20.2 (−)−50 (++)
    29RectumC20.6 (−)+++50 (+++)
    Metastatic disease30ColonDLiver433.5 (+)+10 (+/−)
    31ColonDLiver311.6 (+)+++>90 (+++)
    32ColonDLiver257.4 (+)+20 (+)
    38RectumDLiver10.2 (+)+++85 (++)
    39SigmaDPeritoneum8.7 (+)+50 (++)
    44ColonDMultiple1.5 (−)−Negc
    45ColonDLiver1.5 (−)−Neg
    46SigmaDLiver1.0 (−)++15 (+++)
    49RectumRECdLocoregional3.9 (−)+10 (+/−)
    • a CEA tissue expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis as described in “Material and Methods.”

    • b Synchronous adenocarcinomas of the right colon and the rectum.

    • c Neg, CEA was evaluated only on biopsies obtained from liver metastases (taken for diagnostic purposes).

    • d REC, recurrent.

  • Table 5

    Summary of the CEA RT-PCR results on blood samples from stage A and B2 colorectal cancer patients during postsurgical follow-up

    PatientStageDays post surgeryCEA RT-PCRSerum levelsa
    CEACA19.9CA72-4
    2A−2+++1.4 (−)39.9 (+)10.0 (+)
    30−1.3 (−)27.3 (−)2.1 (−)
    206−1.6 (−)28.1 (−)1.8 (−)
    367−1.2 (−)29.5 (−)2.2 (−)
    444−1.8 (−)22.7 (−)2.5 (−)
    675−2.2 (−)28.5 (−)1.7 (−)
    4A−37++0.6 (−)25.6 (−)1.9 (−)
    0++2.8 (−)29.8 (−)0.7 (−)
    3+2.1 (−)25.6 (−)1.2 (−)
    47+2.2 (−)26.4 (−)1.3 (−)
    122+2.2 (−)24.9 (−)1.3 (−)
    5A−3−0.6 (−)12.2 (−)2.1 (−)
    2−0.8 (−)11.3 (−)1.8 (−)
    4−1.2 (−)6.9 (−)1.7 (−)
    8−0.9 (−)12.4 (−)2.3 (−)
    120−1.4 (−)7.9 (−)2.1 (−)
    240−1.1 (−)9.8 (−)1.9 (−)
    1A0−2.9 (−)8.0 (−)1.7 (−)
    3−2.3 (−)8.1 (−)1.5 (−)
    31−1.8 (−)9.5 (−)1.8 (−)
    90−1.9 (−)6.8 (−)1.6 (−)
    202−2.0 (−)8.1 (−)1.3 (−)
    19B2−2+1.1 (−)8.1 (−)1.8 (−)
    5+2.1 (−)9.9 (−)2.3 (−)
    39−2.4 (−)6.2 (−)3.7 (−)
    126−3.1 (−)4.9 (−)4.2 (−)
    17B2−1+1.7 (−)7.3 (−)2.1 (−)
    47+0.6 (−)5.5 (−)1.6 (−)
    75−2.7 (−)3.5 (−)1.7 (−)
    103−1.0 (−)5.5 (−)2.0 (−)
    15B2−1+++3.1 (−)9.3 (−)4.5 (−)
    41+++2.3 (−)4.7 (−)1.9 (−)
    62+1.8 (−)6.7 (−)2.0 (−)
    90−2.6 (−)8.9 (−)1.5 (−)
    118−1.9 (−)9.7 (−)1.7 (−)
    146−2.5 (−)13.6 (−)2.0 (−)
    309−2.0 (−)12.0 (−)1.9 (−)
    20B20−0.4 (−)18.3 (−)3.4 (−)
    30−1.4 (−)25.3 (−)5.2 (−)
    90−1.8 (−)225.4 (+)7.4 (+)
    120−3.0 (−)525.3 (+)13.1 (+)
    236−2.8 (−)1368.4 (+)21.0 (+)
    280−10.3 (+)2466.6 (+)57.4 (+)
    292−15.1 (+)4273.5 (+)60.6 (+)
    21B2−2−0.2 (−)2.2 (−)3.0 (−)
    108+++2.6 (−)0.1 (−)1.5 (−)
    677+++2.5 (−)4.1 (−)7.8 (+)
    • a Serum CEA levels were determined by an enzyme immunoassay test kit, using a value of 5 ng/ml as positive. CA19.9 was determined using the CA19.9 kit with the suggested value 37 units/ml as positive. Serum CA72-4 antigen levels were determined using the CA72-4 kit with the suggested value 6 units/ml as positive.

  • Table 6

    Summary of the CEA RT-PCR results on blood samples from colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

    PatientStageSite of metastasisDays post surgeryCEA RT-PCRSerum levelsaPostsurgical treatment
    CEACA19.9CA72-4
    26C2−5++5.6 (+)0.4 (−)0.4 (−)CHT-RTb
    90+9.0 (+)18.4 (−)1.2 (−)
    210+12.5 (+)29.3 (−)1.5 (−)
    Lung420+++793.8 (+)2319.0 (+)0.6 (−)Lung metastasis
    Lung483+++894.0 (+)1090.0 (+)1.8 (−)
    38DMultiple−2+++10.2 (+)2.0 (−)0.1 (−)CHT
    36++9.4 (+)0.1 (−)0.1 (−)Stable disease
    53++16.2 (+)0.1 (−)1.8 (−)Stable disease
    235++51.3 (+)0.1 (−)2.6 (−)Stable disease
    319+++82.0 (+)0.8 (−)2.4 (−)PD
    530+++573.1 (+)5.3 (−)3.3 (−)PD
    31DLiver−1+++311.6 (+)6490.1 (+)1.3 (−)CHT
    33−224.0 (+)182.9 (+)2.4 (−)
    51−60.5 (+)462.0 (+)2.6 (−)Responsive
    182++226.5 (+)487.1 (+)42.6 (+)PD
    37DLiver−1+++13.5 (+)84.6 (+)22.5 (+)CHT
    33−4.3 (−)45.3 (+)8.4 (+)Responsive
    51−4.1 (−)39.5 (+)6.9 (+)Responsive
    182++9.5 (+)76.4 (+)18.9 (+)PD
    46DLiver−11+++1.0 (−)0.4 (−)0.3 (−)CHT
    41++1.4 (−)0.1 (−)1.4 (−)Responsive
    56++2.2 (−)0.1 (−)0.4 (−)CR
    219+1.1 (−)0.8 (−)2.1 (−)CR
    • a Serum CEA levels were determined by an enzyme immunoassay test kit, using a value of 5 ng/ml as positive. CA19.9 was determined using the CA19.9 kit with the suggested value 37 units/ml as positive. Serum CA72-4 antigen levels were determined using the CA72-4 kit with the suggested value 6 units/ml as positive.

    • b CHT-RT, chemotherapy + radiotherapy; PD, progressive disease; CR, complete remission.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 61 (6)
March 2001
Volume 61, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection of Blood-borne Cells in Colorectal Cancer Patients by Nested Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Messenger RNA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Detection of Blood-borne Cells in Colorectal Cancer Patients by Nested Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Messenger RNA
Fiorella Guadagni, Judith Kantor, Simona Aloe, Maria Daniela Carone, Antonella Spila, Roberta D’Alessandro, Maria Rosaria Abbolito, Maurizio Cosimelli, Franco Graziano, Fabio Carboni, Sandro Carlini, Pasquale Perri, Francesco Sciarretta, John W. Greiner, Syed V. S. Kashmiri, Seth M. Steinberg, Mario Roselli and Jeffrey Schlom
Cancer Res March 3 2001 (61) (6) 2523-2532;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Detection of Blood-borne Cells in Colorectal Cancer Patients by Nested Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Messenger RNA
Fiorella Guadagni, Judith Kantor, Simona Aloe, Maria Daniela Carone, Antonella Spila, Roberta D’Alessandro, Maria Rosaria Abbolito, Maurizio Cosimelli, Franco Graziano, Fabio Carboni, Sandro Carlini, Pasquale Perri, Francesco Sciarretta, John W. Greiner, Syed V. S. Kashmiri, Seth M. Steinberg, Mario Roselli and Jeffrey Schlom
Cancer Res March 3 2001 (61) (6) 2523-2532;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Expansion of Microvascular Bed and Increased Solute Flux in Human Basal Cell Carcinoma in Vivo, Measured by Fluorescein Video Angiography
  • Analysis of BRAF and N-RAS Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma Tissues
  • Human Kallikrein 5
Show more Clinical Investigations
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement