Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Tumor Biology

Changes in Tenascin-C Isoform Expression in Invasive and Preinvasive Breast Disease

Matthew Adams, J. Louise Jones, Rosemary A. Walker, J. Howard Pringle and Stephen C. Bell
Matthew Adams
University of Leicester, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP [M. A., J. L. J., R. A. W.]; Department of Pathology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX [J. H. P.]; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX [S. C. B.], United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Louise Jones
University of Leicester, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP [M. A., J. L. J., R. A. W.]; Department of Pathology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX [J. H. P.]; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX [S. C. B.], United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosemary A. Walker
University of Leicester, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP [M. A., J. L. J., R. A. W.]; Department of Pathology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX [J. H. P.]; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX [S. C. B.], United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Howard Pringle
University of Leicester, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP [M. A., J. L. J., R. A. W.]; Department of Pathology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX [J. H. P.]; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX [S. C. B.], United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen C. Bell
University of Leicester, Breast Cancer Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP [M. A., J. L. J., R. A. W.]; Department of Pathology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX [J. H. P.]; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX [S. C. B.], United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published June 2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Tenascin-C (TN) is an extracellular matrix protein that is expressed at low levels in normal adult tissue but is highly expressed around many tumors including breast carcinoma. TN exists as multiple isoforms generated through alternative splicing, and these isoforms have different effects on cell growth and migration. This study has analyzed in detail the pattern of TN isoform expression in benign, preinvasive, and invasive breast lesions using reverse transcription-PCR and Southern blotting. Significant differences in the profile of TN isoforms were identified. Although all tissues expressed the fully truncated TN, expression of two additional isoforms, one containing exon 16 (TN16) and one containing both exons 14 and 16 (TN14/16), were significantly associated with the invasive phenotype (P < 0.001). A subset of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases were also found to express these isoforms, which may be indicative of a high risk of invasion in these lesions. Expression of these isoforms correlated with the presence of TN protein in the stroma in place of or in addition to basement membrane TN. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization confirmed the production of exon 14-containing higher molecular weight isoforms by stromal fibroblasts in malignant tissue and both periductal fibroblasts and residual myoepithelial cells in DCIS. Although no evidence of tumor cell synthesis of TN was detected in the tissues, two highly invasive breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB 231 and MDA-MB 468) were found to produce TN in contrast with tumor cells with a lower invasive capacity (MCF-7 and T47D).

These results demonstrate for the first time that specific TN isoforms are expressed in invasive breast carcinomas and that these isoforms are identified in a subset of DCIS and suggest that detection of TN16 and/or TN14/16 may be used as a predictor for invasion. Functional studies are now essential to establish the effect of these isoforms on tumor behavior and evaluate whether they will provide appropriate targets for therapeutic intervention.

INTRODUCTION

Cellular interactions with the ECM 3 are vital for the transduction and integration of signals from the microenvironment. Such interactions occur through specific cell surface receptors and have a profound influence on cell behavior including modulation of cell growth, differentiation, migration, and survival (1) . Exposure of cells to different matrix components can elicit very different effects (2) , and subtle structural changes in the ECM induced by local proteolysis can also influence cell behavior (3) . Thus, matrix composition and structure plays a central role in maintaining normal cellular homeostasis. It has long been recognized that the stroma around a malignant tumor differs from normal ECM. One change that is seen in the stroma of many solid tumors is overexpression of the ECM glycoprotein TN (4, 5, 6) . In breast carcinomas, high expression of TN has been related to poor prognosis (7) , and local and distant recurrence (8) , and expression in DCIS has been suggested to predict invasion (9 , 10) .

The action of TN is complex. It can influence cell behavior directly, through interactions with cell surface receptors, and indirectly by binding to other matrix proteins such as fibronectin and altering their interaction with cells (6 , 11) . TN has been shown to promote cell migration (12 , 13) , inhibit focal adhesion formation (14) , induce cell proliferation (15 , 16) , and in some cases act as a cell survival factor (17) . TN promotes angiogenesis (18) and also induces expression of genes that modify ECM, such as matrix metalloproteinases (19) , which themselves have been implicated in promoting tumor growth and invasion. The potential role of TN in the development of breast cancer has been emphasized recently (20) , and it has been suggested that this protein may be an appropriate target for tumor immunotherapy. TN, however, is not a single protein. It exists as multiple isoforms, and the precise structure of these isoforms determines the ultimate effect of the protein. The oligomer comprises a linear arrangement of domains, with a cysteine-rich NH2 terminus termed the tenascin assembly domain, followed by a series of EGF-like repeats, 8–17 FNIII-like repeats and a fibrinogen-like domain at the COOH terminus (Fig. 1) ⇓ . The structure and size of TN varies as a result of alternative splicing of exons within the FNIII repeat domain (6) . A number of biologically active sites have been mapped to the FNIII repeat domain including recognition sites for cell surface receptors such as integrins, cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily, and annexin II (6) , as well as sites susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by matrix metalloproteinase (21) . Thus, inclusion or exclusion of different exons in this region can generate considerable functional diversity, and evidence from in vitro studies using recombinant proteins and proteolytic fragments of TN demonstrate that different isoforms differently affect adhesion, migration, and proliferation (22 , 23) . Despite this, there are few studies examining TN isoform expression in malignancy, and most have investigated only the two most common isoforms, the “small” or fully truncated TN (tTN) and the “large” unspliced molecule (lTN), containing all of the FNIII repeats. These studies indicate a switch in dominance from the small to large isoform in breast (24) , oral (25) , and colorectal (26) cancers. However, it is likely that more subtle changes in isoform expression occur that could have a profound effect on tumor cell behavior, and that these changes occur at an early stage in tumor progression. The aim of this study, therefore, was to analyze in detail TN isoform expression in benign and malignant breast tissue and to ask whether changes occur before tumor invasion and may therefore be implicated in promoting initial invasion.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram of the structure of TN oligomer. TN comprises an NH2-terminal, cysteine-rich domain, 14 EGF-like repeats, a region of 8–17 FNIII repeats, and a COOH-terminal fibrinogen (FG)-like sequence. Shaded boxes, exons that undergo splicing. AD1 and AD2, additional domains 1 and 2, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Lines and Primary Cultures.

All cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. MCF-7, T47D, MDA-MB 231, MDA-MB 468, and HBL-100 were maintained in DMEM plus 2 mm l-glutamine and 10% FBS; MCF-10A cells were maintained in 1:1 mixture of Ham’s F12 (Life Technologies, Inc.) and DMEM, 2 mm glutamine supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated horse serum, 10 μg/ml insulin, 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, and 20 ng/ml EGF (all obtained from Sigma), and SK Mel 28 in MEMα plus 10% FBS. At 80% confluence, the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM; the cells were incubated for 48 h and then harvested for mRNA extraction and RT-PCR. Primary cultures of normal breast myoepithelial cells were established from reduction mammoplasty tissues after informed patient consent. Briefly, tissue was minced and incubated for 12–18 h in a digestion mixture of 200 units/ml collagenase type IA and 125 units/ml hyaluronidase in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 2.5 μg/ml fungizone. After washing twice in cold DMEM + 10% FBS, a single sedimentation step of 30 min at 4°C was carried out, and the supernatant was removed. For the isolation of myoepithelial cells, remaining organoids were washed and further digested in trypsin/EDTA (Sigma) with 10 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma) for a maximum of 10 min to generate a single cell suspension. Myoepithelial cells were then isolated using CALLA-labeled sheep antimouse IgG1 magnetic beads (Dynal, Bromborough, United Kingdom) and plated in Specialized Media consisting of 1:1 Hams F12:DMEM with 10% FBS, 5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 5 μg/ml insulin, 10 ng/ml EGF, and 100 IU penicillin and streptomycin (all from Sigma). At subconfluence, the cells were transferred to serum-free DMEM for 48 h before extraction of mRNA.

Tissue.

Breast tissue samples, obtained in accordance with current local ethical recommendations, were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen onto cork and stored in the vapor phase of a liquid nitrogen freezer. Parallel slices of tissue were fixed in 10% formal saline for 24 h at room temperature and routinely processed.

Analysis was performed on 15 normal/benign cases, 5 fibroadenomas, 13 cases of DCIS, and 35 carcinomas including 28 infiltrating ductal carcinomas (10 grade I, 9 grade II, and 9 grade III), 5 infiltrating lobular carcinomas, and 2 tubular carcinomas. Carcinomas were reported according to the National Health Service Breast Screening Program Reporting Guidelines (27) and graded using the modified Bloom and Richardson system (28) .

RT-PCR.

mRNA was extracted and processed using oligo-dT-linked Dynabeads (Dynal), as described previously (29) . To ensure approximately equivalent amounts of mRNA in reactions, the sections were scored as high, medium, or low cellularity, and 5, 10, or 15 × 7-μm sections were taken for mRNA extraction. The sections were immediately dropped into 100 μl of lysis/binding buffer [100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 500 mm LiCl, 10 mm EDTA (pH 8.0), 1% w/v SDS, and 5 mm DTT] and incubated with 50 μg/ml proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim) for 1 h at 37°C. The lysate was centrifuged for 30 s at 10,000 × g, and the supernatant was mixed with oligo-dT-linked Dynabeads (Dynal). The mRNA was allowed to anneal to the Dynabeads for 10 min at room temperature. mRNA-linked Dynabeads were washed twice in a buffer containing LiDS [10 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8), 0.15 m LiCl, 1 mm EDTA, and 0.1% LiDS; Dynal] and three times in the same buffer but without LiDS. Dynabeads were finally resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate water. Reverse transcription reactions were carried out at 42°C for 1 h using Expand-RT (Boehringer Mannheim) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

A series of primers for PCR both across and within the alternatively spliced region were designed (Fig. 2a ⇓ ; Table 1 ⇓ ), and PCR was performed using various combinations of these primer cassettes in a Perkin-Elmer Thermocycler. Typical reactions were carried out with 1 μl of cDNA template in a total volume of 50 μl containing PCR buffer [45 mm Tris (pH 8.8), 11 mm (NH4)2SO4, 4.5 mm MgCl2, 200 mm deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 110 μg/ml BSA, 6.7 mm β-mercaptoethanol, and 4.4 mm EDTA, pH 8.8) and 10 pmol each of forward and reverse primers. PCR products were visualized on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

a, combination of primers and oligonucleotide probes. The diagram illustrates the position of primers and probes across the alternatively spliced domain of tenascin. F, forward primers; R, reverse primers. P, used as reverse primers and also as probes for Southern hybridization. b, position of primers across exon boundaries for isoform-specific amplification. This illustrates the position and combination of PCR primers designed for the exclusive amplification of truncated TN, TN16, and TN14/16, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Details of oligonucleotide primers and probes to TN

The table details the nomenclature of the primers used and their sequences and positions within the gene according to base pair number and exon position. The position according to FN repeat, a terminology used by some workers, is also given.

Quantitation of Specific Isoforms.

To amplify individual isoforms, a number of PCR primers were designed across exon boundaries (Fig. 2b) ⇓ . When used with T18R primer, the 9–17 primer across the boundaries of exons 9 and 17 would amplify only the truncated isoform, the 9–16 primer across the boundaries of exons 9 and 16 would amplify only the exon 16-containing isoform, and the 14–16 primer across exons 14 and 16 would amplify only the isoform containing exons 14 plus 16. Optimization of these primer sets was undertaken on the appropriate gel-extracted single isoform at a range of annealing temperatures, and only when a single product of the expected size was obtained were they applied to primary tissues.

Southern Blotting.

Southern analysis of RT-PCR products was performed using a modification of the method described by Southern (30) . Oligonucleotide probes specific to each exon within the variable region (Table 1) ⇓ were labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP in a reaction mixture containing reaction buffer (0.2 mm potassium cocodylate, 25 mm Tris-HCl, and 0.25 μg/ml BSA, pH 6.6), 5 mm CoCl2, 0.08 mm digoxigenin-11-dUTP, 0.4 mm dATP, 45 IU terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, and 1 μg of oligonucleotide at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was halted by addition of 0.5 mm EDTA.

After prehybridization in 5× SSC, 30 μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, 0.1% N-laurylsarcosine NaCl, 0.2% SDS, 35% deionized formamide, and 2% w/v blocking reagent (Boehringer Mannheim) in wash buffer (100 mm maleic acid, 150 mm NaCl, pH 7.5) for 1 h at 37°C, the membranes were probed with single oligonucleotides at 5 ng/ml in hybridization buffer for 18 h at 37°C. Three times 15-min posthybridization washes in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 35% formamide were carried out at 37°C with a final 10-min wash in wash buffer with 3% Tween 20.

Immunological detection used anti-digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Boehringer Mannheim; 1:10,000), followed by chemiluminescent detection (Boehringer Mannheim).

Sequencing.

A direct method of sequencing was applied to isolated agarose gel electrophoresis-purified PCR products. In brief, PCR products were purified from 1% NuSieve agarose gel after electrophoresis. Forward strands were immobilized by the addition of Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin (Dynal) and subsequently denaturated with 0.1m NaOH. The biotinylated strand was isolated using the Dynal magnetic particle concentrator and then washed to remove the other strand. The resultant beads were then used as a template for sequencing using BigDye terminator cycle ready reaction kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, FS (Perkin-Elmer). BigDye terminator reactions were run on a ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer, and the resulting sequence profiles were analyzed using the Chromas software.

Immunohistochemistry.

Immunohistochemical detection of TN was performed on cryosections taken from the same tissue blocks used for RT-PCR analysis using two mouse monoclonal antibodies, the first against an epitope in the conserved EGF-like repeat region of TN (BC-24; Sigma, United Kingdom) and the second specific to a domain within exon 14 of the variable region of TN (αIIIB; Chemicon; Ref. 31 ). Sections were incubated with the primary antibody (BC-24 at 1: 7500 and αIIIB at 1:1000) for 18 h at 4°C and localized using a standard avidin-biotin complex (DAKO) technique. For each case, a negative control with omission of the primary antibody was included. In each case, the distribution of staining was recorded by two independent observers.

In Situ Hybridization.

To localize TN mRNA expression, single-stranded antisense probes for nonisotopic in situ hybridization were synthesized using asymmetric PCR (32 , 33) . Briefly, a biotinylated reverse/antisense primer was used to generate an antisense probe from the sense/coding strand of the PCR product. Digoxigenin-11-dUTP was used as a replacement for a proportion of the nucleotide dTTP to produce a labeled probe. A total TN probe was prepared using products generated from PCR with EGF primers, fully truncated TN using products from 8/18 PCR, and a probe to exons 14–16 using primers between 14/18.

Asymmetric PCR was performed with 1 μl of a RT-PCR product as a template for the reaction amplified previously with a biotinylated forward primer. The reaction included 70 μm digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Lewes, United Kingdom) and 100 pmol reverse primer in reaction buffer as above. One IU Taq polymerase (Promega) was added after an initial denaturation to 98°C, and amplification was carried out for 20 cycles. Double-stranded contaminant was removed by incubation with Streptavidin-Dynabeads (Dynal) to give single-stranded digoxigenin-labeled probe. A positive control probe to β-actin was synthesized in the same manner, a negative sense probe was prepared using a forward primer in the asymmetric reaction, and template was prepared from RT-PCR reaction performed using a biotinylated reverse primer.

In situ hybridization was carried out on dewaxed rehydrated tissue sections. Pretreatment with proteinase K at 2–10 μg/ml in 50 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) at 37°C was optimized for each tissue section. Sections were incubated in prehybridization solution [0.6 m NaCl, 50 mm Tris-HCl, 5 mm EDTA, 0.1% sodium PPI, 0.2% polyvinylpyrollidine (Mr 40,000), 0.2% Ficoll (Mr 400,000), 10% dextran sulfate, 0.15 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 50% formamide] for 1 h at 37°C, followed by hybridization with the digoxigenin-labeled probe in the same solution for 18 h at 37°C. Slides were then washed twice in 2× SSC and 50% formamide, incubated with 1.25 unit/ml alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and washed in TBS [50 mm Tris and 150 mm sodium chloride (pH 7.6)]. Signal was detected by incubation with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitroblue tetrazolium (Sigma) containing 1 mm levamisole (Sigma). The optimum probe concentration was titrated to eliminate background staining while retaining good signal strength. Negative controls were carried out using sense probe to tenascin, RNase pretreatment of the tissue sections, and by omission of the probe in the hybridization protocol. Umbilical cord was used as a positive control tissue.

Invasion Assays.

The invasive potential of the breast cell lines was measured using a modification of the Boyden chamber invasion assay used by Albini et al. (34) as described previously (35) . Each assay was performed a minimum of three times, and a MII was calculated.

RESULTS

Detection of TN Isoform Expression in SK Mel-28 Cells

The malignant melanoma cell line SK Mel-28 has been described previously as expressing multiple TN isoforms (36) , and cDNA from these cells was therefore used to confirm that specific isoform expression could be detected. PCR was performed using multiple combinations of primers including 8/18, 8/11, 8/12, 8/13, 8/14, 8/AD1, 8/15 8/16, and 14/18. Primer sets located within the alternatively spliced domain including 11/AD1 and 14/AD1 were also used. The products were then subjected to Southern blotting and hybridized with exon-specific oligonucleotide probes. Both high and low molecular weight species were identified in keeping with previous reports, including AD1-containing species.

RT-PCR and Southern Blotting Analysis of TN Isoform Expression in Primary Breast Tissue

Assessment of Tissue mRNA Integrity and Comparison of Sample Cellularity.

To assess integrity of mRNA within the samples, because degradation takes place from the 5′ to the 3′ end of the transcript, PCR was performed using primer sets for the EGF-like repeat domain at the 5′ end of the gene and for the fibrinogen-like domain at the 3′ end of the gene. A weaker intensity signal from the 5′ primer set compared with the 3′ set indicates a degree of mRNA degradation within the sample, and such cases were excluded from further analysis.

PCR was also performed with primers to the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and the relative intensity of bands obtained was compared between different samples. The amount of template added to each reaction was adjusted on the basis of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase result to ensure approximately equivalent amounts of cDNA in each reaction.

Analysis of TN Isoform Expression with the 8/18 Primer Cassette.

Using 8/18 primers, three patterns of isoform expression were identified in the breast samples (Fig. 3) ⇓ . The first consisted of a single band of ∼442 bp, indicating the fully truncated form of TN (tTN). The second pattern comprised two bands, the 442-bp band plus a band of 715 bp, indicating inclusion of one additional exon. The third pattern consisted of tTN, a plus-one exon species and a band of 1050 bp, indicating inclusion of two additional exons. Southern blotting followed by hybridization with exon-specific probes confirmed the 442-bp band to be the tTN and demonstrated the two additional bands as containing exon 16 (TN16) and exons 14 plus 16 (TN14/16), respectively (Fig. 3) ⇓ . The identity of these isoforms was also confirmed by sequencing. The shadow bands detected beneath each major isoform band were found on cloning and sequencing to contain a dual isoform population (data not presented) and are thought to represent hybridization between the isoforms present in the PCR mixture.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Pattern of tenascin isoform expression in primary breast tissue using the 8/18 primer set. Three patterns of expression were identified: Lane 1, with a single product of ∼425 bp, which corresponds to the fully truncated tenascin (tTN); Lane 2, with tTN plus a band with one additional exon; and Lane 3, with tTN and two further bands containing a plus-one-exon species and a plus-two-exon species. Southern blotting shows the plus-one-exon band to include exon 16 and the plus-two-exon band to contain exons 14 and 16. The shadow bands beneath each major isoform represent hybrids between the PCR products.

Differences in isoform expression were identified between the tissue samples. Seventy % (14 of 20) of normal/benign cases expressed only tTN compared with 7% (3 of 35) of invasive carcinomas. In contrast, 75% (27 of 35) invasive breast carcinomas were found to express both TN16 and TN14/16, and 14% (5 of 35) expressed TN16 in addition to tTN, whereas only 1 benign sample, a cellular fibroadenoma, expressed TN14/16 (Fig. 4) ⇓ . In all cases, TN 16 was expressed in association with TN14/16. The expression of either TN16 or TN16 plus TN14/16 was significantly related to the malignant (i.e., DCIS and invasive) phenotype (P < 0.0001), whereas expression of TN14/16 was significantly associated with the invasive phenotype (P < 0.0001). For the 13 cases of DCIS, 6 expressed all three isoforms, 4 showed tTN plus TN16, and 3 expressed tTN only (Fig. 4) ⇓ . Two of the three cases exhibiting tTN only were of low/intermediate nuclear grade, whereas the remainder of the cases were high grade in type.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Relationship between tissue type and pattern of tenascin isoform expression. The graph shows the number of cases of each histological type expressing tTN alone, tTN plus TN16 or tTN, TN16 and TN14/16. A highly significant relationship is demonstrated between the expression of either TN16 or TN16 plus TN14/16 and the malignant phenotype (P < 0.001) and between the expression of TN14/16 and the invasive phenotype (P < 0.001).

Semiquantitative Analysis of Specific Isoforms in Relation to Total TN.

PCR primer sets were designed to amplify tTN, TN16, and TN14/16 isoforms specifically to assess the relative abundance of these isoforms in relation to total TN production. PCR was performed initially using single isoforms extracted from agarose gels as templates for primer cassettes 9–17/18, specific for tTN, 9–16/18 specific for TN16, and 9–14/14–16 specific for TN14/16. However, primer cassette 9–17/18 gave a band with all three isoforms under all PCR conditions, whereas the 9–16/18 primer set amplified both TN16 and TN14/16 species. Only the 9–14/14–16 primer set gave specific amplification of the TN14/16 isoform. This primer set was therefore used to demonstrate the presence of the TN14/16 isoform and to compare relative amounts of this isoform with total TN.

A nested PCR procedure was used using products from 8/18 PCR with cycle sampling at 30, 35, and 40 cycles, followed by second round PCR with 9–14/14–16 primers for 25 cycles. This was compared with levels of total TN using fibrinogen-repeat primers at 30 and 35 cycles. A clear band for total TN was generated in each sample at 35 cycles; however, differences in band intensity at 30 and 35 cycles indicated differences in abundance of mRNA for TN in the different samples (Fig. 5) ⇓ . With the 9–14/14–16 primer set, 86% (24 of 28) invasive carcinoma samples exhibited a band, indicating expression of the TN14/16 isoform, compared with 73% (8 of 11) cases of DCIS and 50% (7 of 14) benign samples. The detection of the TN14/16 isoform using this approach was significantly related to the malignant phenotype (P < 0.033), and the relative intensity of bands achieved for TN14/16 and total TN suggests that TN14/16 was not being detected simply because more total TN was present in the tissue. Five fibroadenomas were also analyzed using this primer set, and 4 exhibited a band for the TN14/16 isoform. When fibroadenomas are included with the benign sample group, the significant relationship of TN14/16 detection with the malignant phenotype was lost (P < 0.062).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Expression of TN14/16 isoform using isoform-specific primers compared with total tenascin expression. Cycle sampling of PCR for the FN domain of TN reveals differences in the intensity of products generated, indicating differences in the relative abundance of TN between samples. PCR using the 9/14–14/16 primer set similarly indicates differences in the abundance of the TN14/16 isoform between samples. Detection of TN14/16 was more frequent in invasive carcinomas than DCIS or benign tissues. In some cases, e.g., Lane 11, a very intense band for TN14/16 was generated in comparison with the level of total TN, which suggests a change in the profile of TN isoforms expressed.

Analysis of TN Isoform Expression with 11/16 Primer Set.

A series of 10 samples were further analyzed using the primer cassette 11/16. Four patterns of expression were detected: (a) no signal, indicating that no isoforms containing these exons are present; (b) a band of 1025 bp, indicating isoforms containing 3 exons between exons 11 and 16; (c) bands of 1025 and 812 bp, indicating species containing 3 and 2 exons, respectively, between exons 11 and 16; and (d) three bands including the 1025- and 812-bp species described, and a third band of 536 bp, indicating addition of 1 exon between exons 11 and 16 (Fig. 6) ⇓ . All but one malignant sample expressed the largest isoform with three additional exons between exons 11 and 16, whereas only 1 benign sample showed this pattern of isoform expression. The intermediate-sized isoforms containing one or two additional exons were expressed only in invasive carcinoma samples, with no detection in the benign or DCIS cases. Unfortunately because of limiting amounts of mRNA from appropriate samples, it was not possible to characterize these exons by Southern blotting.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Pattern of tenascin isoform expression in breast tissue using the 11/16 primer set. Products indicating isoforms containing three exons between exons 11 and 16 (1025 bp) were detected in benign, DCIS, and invasive samples. In contrast, the intermediate-sized products, indicating one or two exons between exons 11 and 16, were detected only in malignant (DCIS and invasive) samples.

RT-PCR for AD1-containing Isoforms.

In addition to PCR with 8/18 primers flanking the entire alternatively spliced domain, PCR was performed with the 8/AD1 primer set. No product was obtained with the 8/AD1 primers, indicating that no AD1-containing isoforms were expressed in benign, DCIS, or malignant breast tissue.

Expression and Distribution of TN Proteins in Primary Breast Tissue

Immunohistochemistry was performed on all samples analyzed by RT-PCR using BC-24 that recognizes all TN isoforms, thereby indicating distribution of all TN proteins and αIIIB specific to a domain within exon 14 of TN. In the normal/benign cases, strong intensity staining for total TN was detected in the basement membrane zone of ducts and acini as well as in the walls of blood vessels (Fig. 7a) ⇓ . There was no significant staining localized to the stromal compartment of these cases. In contrast, all invasive carcinomas demonstrated extensive diffuse stromal staining around tumor groups (Fig. 7b) ⇓ . In DCIS, a variable pattern of reactivity was observed; all cases revealed staining in the basement membrane zone; however, around some ducts, this was discontinuous. In addition, 9 of 13 cases exhibited laminations of staining in the stroma surrounding the abnormal duct (Fig. 7c) ⇓ .

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Expression and distribution of tenascin protein and mRNA in breast tissue. Using an antibody that recognizes all TN isoforms (Total TN), strong linear staining is seen in the basement membrane region of normal ducts and acini (a), in contrast with the diffuse stromal reactivity around invasive carcinomas (c). Stromal reactivity is also present around ducts containing DCIS (b). With the antibody specific to exon 14 of TN (TN14), most normal breast ducts and acini did not exhibit staining (d), with only occasional ducts and acini in 7 cases revealing basement membrane reactivity (g and h). Blood vessels in normal breast displayed consistent reactivity with Ab14 antibody (i). A similar pattern of staining as that seen for total TN was present in DCIS (e) and invasive carcinomas (f), indicating the presence of exon 14-containing higher molecular weight species in tumor-associated stroma. No signal was generated in normal breast tissue using probes to total TN or tTN (j and m). In contrast, strong signals were generated in the fibroblasts surrounding invasive tumor groups (l and o). In DCIS, a signal with each probe is evident in residual myoepithelial cells surrounding affected ducts (arrow, k and n) and in periductal fibroblasts (arrowhead, k and n). An identical pattern of reactivity was seen with probes to TN14–17 (not illustrated).

The majority of normal/benign ducts and lobules showed no reactivity with the antibody to exon 14 (Fig. 7d) ⇓ . In contrast, the pattern of staining in DCIS was similar to that seen with the total TN antibody, with the same 9 of 13 cases exhibiting periductal stromal reactivity (Fig. 7e) ⇓ , and intense reactivity was observed in the peritumoral stroma of all of the invasive carcinomas (Fig. 7f) ⇓ . However, seven cases of normal breast revealed intense basement membrane zone staining in one or more acini within a lobule or around a duct (Fig. 7, g and h) ⇓ . Interestingly, in many of the normal cases, reactivity for the exon 14 antibody was seen in the wall of large and small blood vessels included in the tissue section (Fig. 7i) ⇓ . All of the fibroadenomas also displayed diffuse stromal staining with this antibody.

Localization of TN mRNA in Breast Tissue

In situ hybridization was performed on 18 cases using single-stranded asymmetric probes to β-actin, tTN, total TN, and species containing exons 14–17. A strong signal for β-actin was demonstrated in all cells of each case, indicating good mRNA integrity. In normal and benign breast tissues, no signal was generated with any of the TN probes (Fig. 7, j and m) ⇓ , whereas in the invasive carcinomas, strong signal was generated for total TN, tTN, and TN14–16, in each case being localized to the peritumoral stroma (Fig. 7, l and o) ⇓ . No convincing signal was localized to the tumor cell population. In the DCIS cases, signal was exhibited for all three TN probes in myoepithelial cells around affected ducts and in the periductal fibroblasts (Fig. 7, k and n) ⇓ . Tissue incubated with sense probes or in the absence of probe exhibited no signal, confirming the specificity of the reaction.

Relationship between TN Expression and Invasive Activity by Breast Cell Lines

Invasion assays were performed on four breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 8a) ⇓ . These showed that the MDA-MB 231 cells were the most highly invasive with a MII of 61.5% (SD, 4.66). The MDA-MB 468 cells were also highly invasive with a MII of 51.8% (SD, 2.46), whereas the MCF-7 and T47D cells were markedly less invasive in this assay with MII of 31.0% (SD, 1.50) and 12.0% (SD, 1.96), respectively.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

A, in vitro invasive capacity of breast cancer cell lines. Matrigel-barrier invasion assays were performed on four breast cancer cell lines. MDA-MB 231 and MDA-MB 468 cells are highly invasive with MIIs of 61.5 and 51.8%, respectively, whereas the MCF-7 and T47D cells are markedly less invasive with MIIs of 31.0 and 12.0%, respectively. B, tenascin expression pattern by breast cell lines and normal breast myoepithelial cells. Analysis of TN expression in breast cells was performed by RT-PCR using the EGF-like repeat primer cassette. The two highly invasive cancer cell lines MDA-MB 231 and MDA-MB 468 (Lanes 4 and 5) express TN, whereas the tumor cell lines with a low invasive capacity, MCF-7 and T47D (Lanes 2 and 3), do not. Primary myoepithelial cells were found to express TN (Lane 1), as did the nontumorigenic HBL-100 and MCF-10A cell lines (Lanes 6 and 7). Bars, SE.

RT-PCR for total TN demonstrated that TN was produced by MDA-MB 231 and MDA-MB 468 breast cancer cells but not by MCF-7 or T47D cells. Tenascin was also expressed by myoepithelial cells and the two nontumorigenic cell lines HBL-100 and MCF-10A (Fig. 8b) ⇓ .

DISCUSSION

TN is a large glycoprotein that is highly expressed in many solid tumors (26 , 37) . Multiple isoforms may be generated through alternative splicing of exons within the FNIII repeat region, and these isoforms have been shown to exert different effects on aspects of cell behavior such as proliferation and migration (12 , 15 , 16) . Developmental studies indicate strict temporal and spatial control of isoform expression (38) , implying a structure-function relationship; however, few studies have addressed whether distinct patterns of TN isoform expression occur with the development and progression of malignancy. Using a combined RT-PCR and Southern blotting approach, this study has identified consistent differences in the pattern of isoform expression between benign, preinvasive, and invasive breast lesions. Using the 8/18 primer cassette that spans the entire alternatively spliced region, the fully truncated form of TN (tTN) was identified in all samples; however, in a proportion of cases, two further isoforms were identified, one containing exon 16 (TN16) and one containing exons 14 plus 16 (TN14/16). The expression of both TN16 and TN14/16 was significantly associated with the malignant phenotype, whereas expression of TN14/16 was related to the invasive phenotype. An important issue to be considered in the interpretation of these results was that detection of these higher molecular weight fragments in malignant samples represented a true qualitative change in expression and was not simply a reflection of higher levels of TN. In some samples, the bands for TN16 and TN14/16 were of greater intensity than tTN, suggesting a switch in isoform predominance rather than an increase in all TN isoforms. To address this more directly, primers were designed across exon boundaries to specifically amplify tTN, TN16, and TN14/16 in separate reactions. Using the purified isoform as template, only the 9–14/14–16 primer set could be optimized to amplify a single isoform, probably because of the high degree of homology between the different exons, particularly at the exon borders. When the 9–14/14–16 primer set was applied to the tissue samples, a product was obtained in 86% of invasive carcinomas and 73% of DCIS cases, confirming expression of the TN14/16 isoform in the majority of malignant samples. The relative intensity of total TN expression, assessed using primers to the fibrinogen-repeat region, compared with the relative intensities of bands obtained for TN14/16, indicated that strong expression of TN14/16 was not invariably related to higher levels of expression of total TN, further supporting a qualitative as well as quantitative change in TN expression. Interestingly, a higher proportion of benign cases exhibited a band for TN14/16 using the specific isoform primers compared with the 8/18 primer cassette. This is likely to relate to the enhanced sensitivity of the nested PCR approach used with the specific isoform primers and indicates that small amounts of TN14/16 are present in some benign tissues. Evidence for the presence of higher molecular weight species of TN in normal/benign breast was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, which revealed staining with the exon 14 antibody in occasional glands but more abundantly and consistently in the wall of blood vessels. Thus, it is possible that the product for TN14/16 on RT-PCR generated from some benign cases relates to TN production in smooth muscle or endothelial cells. However, even using this highly sensitive technique, 50% of nonfibroadenoma benign cases did not yield a product for TN14/16, demonstrating that this isoform is certainly much more abundant in malignant tissue.

Studies that have used similar approaches have also identified specific changes in TN isoform expression associated with malignancy, although these differences appear to be tissue type specific. In renal cancer, the fully truncated isoform is predominant (39) ; however, the TN14/16 isoform has been related to the malignant phenotype in previous studies in malignant ovarian tumors (40) , and in some tumor cell lines (36) , although it is not a major isoform in normal tissues such as fetal membranes (41) , raising the suggestion that this isoform may have functional significance in terms of tumor progression. Of particular interest is the finding of a similar altered isoform profile in a subset of preinvasive lesions with 46% of cases exhibiting TN16 and TN14/16, 31% expressing TN16, and 23% of cases producing tTN only. To address whether such altered isoform expression can predict for tumor progression would require a larger study with comparison to grade, recurrence, and presence or absence of microinvasion.

Other changes in isoform expression were also identified using different combinations of primer cassettes. Although analysis was performed on a limited number of cases, differences between benign and malignant tissue were detected using the 11/16 primer set, with the majority of cases expressing larger isoforms containing three additional exons between 11 and 16, whereas only DCIS and invasive carcinomas exhibited isoforms of intermediate size with one or two additional exons. The detection of these larger isoforms appears to contradict the results obtained using the 8/18 primer cassette, which suggest that only isoforms with 16 or 14 plus 16 exons are present; however, this is likely to result from amplification of low abundance higher molecular weight species using primers internal to the FNIII-repeat domain. This is in keeping with previous studies that indicate the presence of low levels of high molecular weight species in normal and benign breast tissue (24) . Because of the limiting amounts of mRNA, Southern blotting was not performed on the products obtained with this primer set; however, the consistency observed in splicing patterns suggests that these bands correspond to a plus 12, 15, and 14 isoform, with the plus-two-exon isoform containing either 12 or 15 and the plus-one-exon isoform lacking both 12 and 15. Thus, the smallest isoform would correspond to TN14/16. The detection of a similar TN isoform profile, with increased abundance of intermediate-sized isoforms in malignancy, has also been reported in ovarian tumors (40) .

Genomic sequencing has identified two novel repeats, initially in chicken and later in human tenascin, termed “additional” repeats AD-1 and AD-2 (42 , 43) . AD-1 has been shown to be highly expressed at sites of tissue remodeling in embryonic tissues and also in tumor cell lines from breast, melanoma, and retinoblastoma (44) , whereas AD-2 appears to be rarely expressed in human tissue (43) . In the present study, there was no evidence of AD-1-containing isoforms in breast tissue.

The changes identified in TN isoform mRNA were associated with changes in the amount and distribution of the TN protein. In both DCIS and invasive tumors, stromal reactivity was detected, and the αIIIB antibody confirmed that this stromal expression included exon 14-containing species, which were largely undetectable in normal breast other than in relation to blood vessels. It has been suggested previously that expression of TN around DCIS correlates with grade (45) and is predictive of invasive behavior (8) . This study demonstrates that as well as an increase in the amount of TN around DCIS, there is also a qualitative change, with the presence of higher molecular weight species, and it is possible that these may alter the microenvironment to promote invasion.

In situ hybridization demonstrated that total TN, tTN, and isoforms containing exons 14–18 are synthesized in the stromal compartment of invasive carcinomas and in residual myoepithelial cells and periductal fibroblasts of DCIS. No convincing signal was detected in the tumor cell population, which is in contrast to previous studies indicating that tumor cells may be the source of TN in breast carcinomas (46) and that this relates to a more aggressive phenotype (47) . The lack of signal in tumor cells in this study most likely relates to selection bias in the cases studied, and a wider study is indicated not only to confirm the expression of TN by tumor cells but also to address whether tumor cells synthesize a different profile of TN isoforms compared with fibroblasts, which may influence tumor cell behavior. RT-PCR analysis of a series of breast cancer cell lines, however, supports the concept that tumor cells may produce TN. This demonstrated that both of the highly invasive tumor cell lines synthesized TN in contrast to the less aggressive cell lines, which showed no evidence of TN expression. Interestingly, two nontumorigenic cell lines, HBL-100 and MCF-10A, and primary myoepithelial cells were also found to produce TN. Both HBL-100 and MCF-10A display features of a myoepithelial phenotype, 4 and all of the cell lines that produce TN express the intermediate filament vimentin. This suggests that epithelial cell expression of TN is seen predominantly in cells with mesenchymal characteristics, either as part of their normal phenotype, as in myoepithelial cells, or as part of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (48) . No signal for TN mRNA was identified in normal breast tissue; however, the localization of TN protein to the basement membrane and the detection of TN expression in separated myoepithelial cell populations suggests that myoepithelial cells are the most likely source for TN in the normal breast, but that the rate of synthesis of TN in normal breast is below the threshold of detection.

In conclusion, this study has identified consistent and significant changes in TN isoform expression in malignant compared with normal/benign breast, associated with a change in the distribution of TN protein from the basement membrane zone to the peritumoral stroma and also in protein composition, with detection of exon 14-containing molecules. The presence of altered isoform expression in a subset of DCIS is of particular interest because this suggests there is remodeling of the stromal microenvironment before tumor invasion. Additional studies are now indicated to establish the functional and clinical significance of these TN isoforms and to identify their potential as predictive markers for tumor invasion. Clinical trials have already been carried out in patients with glioma using 131I-labeled antibodies to TN (49) . Identification of specific isoforms that are involved in breast tumor progression would provide a powerful therapeutic target.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported by National Health Service Executive Trent, United Kingdom and the Royal College of Pathologists British United Provident Association Research Fellowship.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Breast Cancer Research Unit, Department of Pathology, University of Leicester, Clinical Sciences Wing, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, United Kingdom. Fax: 44-(0)-116-252-3274; E-mail: lj17{at}le.ac.uk.

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular matrix; TN, tenascin-C; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; RT-PCR, Reverse transcription-PCR; EGF, epidermal growth factor; FNIII, fibronectin type III; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MII, mean invasion index; tTN, truncated tenascin; lTN, large tenascin.

  • ↵4 J. L. Jones, M. Adams, and R. A. Walker, unpublished observations.

  • Received November 26, 2001.
  • Accepted March 27, 2002.
  • ©2002 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Donjacour A. A., Cunha G. R. Stromal regulation of epithelial function. Cancer Treat. Res., 53: 335-364, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Lee Y-J., Streuli C. H. Extracellular matrix selectively modulates the response of mammary epithelial cells to different soluble signalling ligands. J. Cell Biol., 274: 22401-22408, 1999.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Giannelli G., Falk Marzillier J., Schiraldi O., Stetler-Stevenson W. G., Quaranta V. Induction of cell migration by matrix metalloproteinase-2 cleavage of laminin-5. Science (Wash. DC), 277: 225-228, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Mackie E. J., Pearson C. A., Sakakura T. Tenascin: an extracellular matrix protein involved in tissue interactions during fetal development and oncogenesis. Cell, 47: 1313-1319, 1986.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Jones J. L., Critchley D. R., Walker R. A. Alteration of stromal protein and integrin expression in breast—a marker of premalignant change?. J. Pathol., 167: 399-406, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Jones F. S., Jones P. L. The tenascin family of ECM glycoproteins: structure, function and regulation during embryonic development and tissue remodelling. Dev. Dyn., 218: 235-259, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Ishihara A., Yoshida T., Tamaki H., Sakakura T. Tenascin expression in cancer cells and stroma of human breast and its prognostic significance. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 1035-1041, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. ↵
    Jahkola T., Toivonen T., Virtanen I., von Smitten K., Nordling S., von Boguslawski K., Haglund C., Nevanlinna H., Blomqvist C. Tenascin-C expression in invasion border of early breast cancer: a predictor of local and distant recurrence. Br. J. Cancer, 78: 1507-1513, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Jahkola T., Toivonen T., Nordling S., von Smitten K., Virtanen I. Expression of tenascin-C in intraductal carcinoma of human breast: relationship to invasion. Eur. J. Cancer, 34: 1687-1692, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Ikaros B. E., Sison C. P., Hajdu S. I. Tenascin patterns of expression in duct carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., 30: 266-271, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Matsuoka Y., Hofer U., Spring J., Bernasconi C., Chiquet M. Tenascin variants: differential binding to fibronectin and distinct distribution in cell cultures and tissue. Cell Regul., 2: 927-938, 1991.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Phillips G., Krushel L. A., Crossin K. L. Domains of tenascin involved in glioma migration. J. Cell Sci., 111: 1095-1104, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Wilson K. E., Bartlett J. M. S., Miller E. P., Smyth J. F., Mullen P., Miller W. R. Regulation and function of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin-C in ovarian cancer cell lines. Br. J. Cancer, 80: 685-692, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Murphy-Ullrich J. E., Lighter V. A., Aukhil I., Yan Y. Z., Erickson H. P. Focal adhesion integrity is down-regulated by the alternatively spliced domain of human tenascin. J. Cell Biol., 115: 1127-1136, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Chung C. Y., Murphy-Ullrich J. E., Erickson H. P. Mitogenesis, cell migration and loss of focal adhesions induced by tenascin-C interacting with its cell surface receptor annexin II. Mol. Biol. Cell, 7: 883-892, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Swindle C. S., Tran K. T., Johnson T. D., Banerjee P., Mayes A. M., Griffith L., Wells A. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats of human tenascin-C as ligands for EGF receptor. J. Cell Biol., 154: 459-468, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Cowan K. N., Jones P. L., Rabinovitch M. Elastase and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors induce regression and tenascin-C antisense prevents progression of vascular disease. J. Clin. Investig., 105: 21-34, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Schenk S., Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Battegay E. J. The fibrinogen globe of tenascin-C promotes basic fibroblast growth factor-induced endothelial cell elongation. Mol. Biol. Cell, 10: 2933-2943, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Tremble P., Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Werb Z. The extracellular matrix ligands fibronectin and tenascin collaborate in regulating collagenase gene expression in fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell, 5: 439-453, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Jones P. L. Extracellular matrix and tenascin-C in pathogenesis of breast cancer. Lancet, 357: 1992-1994, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Siri A., Knauper V., Veirana N., Caocci F., Murphy G., Zardi L. Different susceptibility of small and large human tenascin-C isoforms to degradation by matrix metalloproteinases. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 8650-8654, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Jones P. L., Boudreau N., Myers C. A., Erickson H. P., Bissell M. J. Tenascin-C inhibits extracellular matrix dependent gene expression in mammary epithelial cells. Localisation of active regions using recombinant fragments. J. Cell Sci., 108: 519-527, 1995.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    LaFleur D. W., Chiang J., Fagin J. A., Schwartz S. M., Shah P. K., Wallner K., Forrester J. S., Sharif B. G. Aortic smooth muscle cells interact with tenascin-C through its fibrinogen-like domain. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 32798-32803, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Borsi L., Carnemolla B., Nicolo G., Spina B., Tanara G., Zardi L. Expression of different tenascin isoforms in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human breast. Int. J. Cancer, 52: 688-692, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Hindermann W., Berndt A., Borsi L., Luo X., Hyckel P., Katenkamp D., Kosmehl H. Synthesis and protein distribution of the unspliced large tenascin-C isoform in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Pathol., 189: 475-480, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Dueck M., Riedl S., Hinz U., Tandara A., Moller P., Herfarth C., Faissner A. Detection of tenascin-C isoforms in colorectal mucosa, ulcerative colitis, carcinomas and liver metastases. Int. J. Cancer, 82: 477-483, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    National Co-ordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology. . Pathology Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening, Ed. 2 National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) Sheffield, United Kingdom 1995.
  28. ↵
    Elston C. W., Ellis I. O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology, 19: 403-410, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Bicknell G. R., Shaw J. A., Pringle J. H., Furness P. N. Amplification of specific mRNA from a single human renal glomerulus, with an approach to the separation of epithelial cell mRNA. J. Pathol., 180: 188-193, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol., 98: 503-517, 1975.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Balza E., Siri A., Ponassi M., Caocci F., Linnala A., Virtanen I., Zardi L. Production and characterisation of monoclonal antibodies specific for different epitopes of human tenascin. FEBS Lett., 332: 39-43, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Scully S. P., Joyce M. E., Abidi N., Bolander M. E. The use of polymerase chain reaction generated nucleotide sequences as probes for hybridisation. Mol. Cell. Probes, 4: 485-495, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    McParland P. C., Bell S. C., Pringle J. H., Taylor D. J. Regional and cellular localization of osteonectin/SPARC expression in connective tissue and cytotrophoblastic layers of human fetal membranes at term. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 7: 463-474, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Albini A., Iwamoto Y., Kleinman H. K., Martin G. R., Aaronson S. A., Kozlowski J. M., McEwan R. N. A rapid in vitro assay for quantitating the invasive potential of tumour cells. Cancer Res., 47: 3239-3245, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Jones J. L., Royall J. E., Critchley D. R., Walker R. A. Modulation of the myoepithelial associated α6β4 integrin in a breast cancer cell line alters invasive potential. Exp. Cell Res., 235: 325-333, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Siri A., Carnemolla B., Saginati M., Leprini A., Casari G., Baralle F., Zardi L. Human tenascin: primary structure, pre-mRNA splicing patterns and localisation of the epitopes recognised by two monoclonal antibodies. Nucleic Acids Res., 19: 525-531, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Natali P. G., Nicotra M. R., Bigotti A., Botti C., Castellani C., Risso A. M., Zardi L. Comparative analysis of the expression of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin in normal human fetal adult and tumour tissues. Int. J. Cancer, 47: 811-817, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Joester A., Faissner A. Evidence for combinatorial variability of tenascin-C isoforms and developmental regulation in the mouse central nervous system. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 17144-17151, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Lohi J., Tani J., Laitinen L., Kangas L., Lehto V. P., Virtanen I. Tenascin and fibronectin isoforms in human renal cell carcinomas, renal cell carcinoma cell lines and xenografts in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer, 63: 442-449, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Wilson K. E., Langdon S. P., Lessells A. M., Miller W. R. Expression of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin in malignant and benign ovarian tumours. Br. J. Cancer, 74: 999-1004, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Bell S. C., Pringle J. H., Taylor D. J., Malak T. M. Alternatively spliced tenascin-C mRNA isoforms in human fetal membranes. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 5: 1066-1076, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Tucker R. P., Spring J., Baumgartner S., Martin D., Hagios C., Poss P. M., Chiquet-Ehrismann R. Novel tenascin variants with a distinctive pattern of expression in the avian embryo. Development (Camb.), 120: 637-647, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. ↵
    Mighell A. J., Thompson J., Hume W. J., Markham A. F., Robinson P. A. Human Tenascin-C: identification of a novel type III repeat in oral cancer and of novel splice variants in normal, malignant and reactive oral mucosa. Int. J. Cancer, 72: 236-240, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Derr L. B., Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Gandour-Edwards R., Spence J., Tucker R. P. The expression of tenascin-C with the AD1 variable repeat in embryonic tissues, cell lines and tumours in various vertebrate species. Differentiation (Camb.), 62: 71-82, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Goepel C., Buchmann J., Schultka R., Koelbl H. Tenascin—a marker for the malignant potential of preinvasive breast cancers. Gynaecol. Oncol., 79: 372-378, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Lightner V. A., Marks J. R., McCachren S. S. Epithelial cells are an important source of tenascin in normal and malignant breast tissue. Exp. Cell Res., 210: 177-184, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Dandachi N., Hauser-Kronberger C., More E., Wiesener B., Hacker G. W., Dietze O., Wirl G. Co-expression of tenascin-C and vimentin in human breast cancer cells indicates phenotypic transdifferentiation during tumour progression: correlation with histopathological parameters, hormone receptors and oncogenes. J. Pathol., 193: 181-189, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Pulyaeva H., Bueno J., Polette M., Birembaut H., Sato H., Seiki M., Thompson E. W. MT1-MMP correlates with MMP-2 activation potential seen after epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human breast carcinoma cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 15: 111-120, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Cokgor I., Akabani G., Kuan C. T., Friedman H. S., Friedman A. H., Coleman R. E., Mclendon R. E., Bigner S. H., Zhao X. G., Garcia-Turner A. M., Pegram C. N., Wikstrand C. J., Shafman T. D., Herndon J. E., Provenzale J. M., Zalutsky M. R., Bigner D. D. Phase I trial results of iodine-131-labelled anti-tenascin monoclonal antibody 81C6 treatment of patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas. J. Clin. Oncol., 18: 3862-3872, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 62 (11)
June 2002
Volume 62, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Changes in Tenascin-C Isoform Expression in Invasive and Preinvasive Breast Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Changes in Tenascin-C Isoform Expression in Invasive and Preinvasive Breast Disease
Matthew Adams, J. Louise Jones, Rosemary A. Walker, J. Howard Pringle and Stephen C. Bell
Cancer Res June 1 2002 (62) (11) 3289-3297;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Changes in Tenascin-C Isoform Expression in Invasive and Preinvasive Breast Disease
Matthew Adams, J. Louise Jones, Rosemary A. Walker, J. Howard Pringle and Stephen C. Bell
Cancer Res June 1 2002 (62) (11) 3289-3297;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Abstract 6119: RNAi rat models for drug discovery
  • Abstract 3834: Histone methyltransferase SET8 is regulated by miR-192/-215 and induces oncogene-induced senescence via p53-dependent DNA damage in human gastric carcinoma cells
  • Abstract 3788: CircHMGCS1 interacts with RNA binding protein HuR and maintains stem-like cells in gliomas
Show more Tumor Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement