Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Experimental Therapeutics

Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 Inhibits Human Myeloma Cell Growth in Vivo and Prolongs Survival in a Murine Model

Richard LeBlanc, Laurence P. Catley, Teru Hideshima, Suzanne Lentzsch, Constantine S. Mitsiades, Nicholas Mitsiades, Donna Neuberg, Olga Goloubeva, Christine S. Pien, Julian Adams, Deepak Gupta, Paul G. Richardson, Nikhil C. Munshi and Kenneth C. Anderson
Richard LeBlanc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurence P. Catley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teru Hideshima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne Lentzsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantine S. Mitsiades
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Mitsiades
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna Neuberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olga Goloubeva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine S. Pien
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julian Adams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deepak Gupta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul G. Richardson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikhil C. Munshi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth C. Anderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published September 2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The proteasome is a ubiquitous and essential intracellular enzyme that degrades many proteins regulating cell cycle, apoptosis, transcription, cell adhesion,angiogenesis, and antigen presentation. We have shown recently that the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces apoptosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human myeloma cells in vitro. In this study, we examined the efficacy, toxicity, and in vivo mechanism of action of PS-341 using a human plasmacytoma xenograft mouse model. One hundred immunodeficient (beige-nude-xid) mice were used in two independent experiments. The mice were injected s.c. with 3 × 107 RPMI-8226 myeloma cells. When tumors became measurable (9.2 days; range, 6–13 days after tumor injection), mice were assigned to treatment groups receiving PS-341 0.05 mg/kg (n = 13), 0.1 mg/kg (n = 15), 0.5 mg/kg (n = 14), or 1.0 mg/kg (n = 14) twice weekly via tail vein, or to control groups (n = 13) receiving the vehicle only. Significant inhibition of tumor growth, even with some complete tumor regression, was observed in PS-341-treated mice. The median overall survival was also significantly prolonged compared with controls (30 and 34 days for high dose-treated mice versus 14 days for controls; P < 0.0001). PS-341 was well tolerated up to 0.5 mg/kg, but some mice treated at 1.0 mg/kg became moribund and lost weight. Analysis of tumors harvested from treated animals showed that PS-341 induced apoptosis and decreased angiogenesis in vivo. These studies therefore demonstrate that PS-341 has significant in vivo antimyeloma activity at doses that are well tolerated in a murine model, confirming our in vitro data and further supporting the early clinical promise of PS-341 to overcome drug resistance and improve patient outcome.

INTRODUCTION

The proteasome is a large intracellular molecule with multicatalytic protease activities found both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus (1 , 2) . It is an essential enzyme complex for the nonlysosomal, ATP-dependent proteolytic pathway (3) , catalyzing the rapid degradation of intracellular proteins regulating cell cycle (4) , apoptosis (5) , cell adhesion (6) , transcription (7) , angiogenesis (8) , and antigen presentation by MHC class I molecules (9) . It is also essential for the rapid elimination of abnormal proteins, arising via mutation or by posttranslational damage such as oxidation. The catalytic core of this complex is found on the 20S proteasome subunit, a multicatalytic protease containing at least three peptidase activities: chymotryptic-like, tryptic-like, and post-glutamyl peptide hydrolyzing activities (10 , 11) .

Proteasome inhibitors represent a potential active novel anticancer therapy (12 , 13) . They have been shown recently to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of tumor cells in vitro. In xenograft murine models, proteasome inhibitors, alone or in combination, also induce tumor regression in human lymphoma (14) and carcinoma (15, 16, 17) . PS-341, a dipeptide boronic acid analogue, is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that selectively and specifically inhibits chymotryptic activity of the proteasome 20S subunit, presumably through its noncovalent binding to the NH2-terminal threonine residue containing a catalytic site (18) .

We have shown recently that PS-341 acts both on MM 4 cells and the bone marrow microenvironment to overcome drug resistance. Specifically, PS-341 inhibits MAP kinase signaling and MM cell proliferation; triggers caspase-3-mediated apoptosis; and overcomes drug resistance by inhibiting NF-κB, with resultant decreased adhesion molecule expression and MM cell binding to bone marrow stromal cells, as well as abrogation of related IL-6 secretion from bone marrow stromal cells (19) . In this study, we examined the in vivo dose-response effects of PS-341 on tumor cell growth and survival in a human plasmacytoma xenograft murine model and characterized mechanisms of its in vivo antitumor activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.

Six-week-old male triple immune-deficient BNX mice (n = 100) were obtained from Frederick Cancer Research and Developmental Center (Frederick, MD). They were maintained in a specific pathogen-free area in our animal resources facility. All animal studies were conducted according to protocols approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. They all received antibiotic (Enrofloxacin) as prophylaxis against infection.

Cells and Culture Conditions.

The RPMI 8226 MM cell line (American Type Culture Collection) was cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), 2 mm l-glutamine (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc.). Before s.c. tumor cell injection into mice, cells were washed twice and resuspended in RPMI 1640 at a concentration of 3 × 107 cells/100 μl.

Drug.

PS-341 (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) mixed with mannitol (in a ratio of 1:10 to increase the solubility) was solubilized in 0.9% sodium chloride (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) at the appropriate concentration before each drug injection.

Xenograft Murine Model.

Mice were inoculated s.c. into the right flank with 3 × 107 MM cells in 100 μl of RPMI 1640, together with 100 μl of Matrigel basement membrane matrix (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA). When tumor was measurable, mice were assigned into four treatment groups receiving PS-341 or into a control group. Treatment with PS-341 was given i.v. twice weekly via tail vein at 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg for 4 weeks. Subsequently, it was administered once weekly. The control group received the vehicle alone (0.9% sodium chloride) at the same schedule. Caliper measurements of the longest perpendicular tumor diameters were performed every alternate day to estimate the tumor volume, using the following formula: 4π/3 × (width/2)2 × (length/2), representing the three-dimensional volume of an ellipse. Animals were sacrificed when their tumors reached 2 cm or when the mice became moribund. Survival was evaluated from the first day of treatment until death.

Proteasome Inhibition Assay.

At the time of mouse sacrifice, 1 h after the last drug injection, cell lysates from whole blood, tumor, liver, and spleen were obtained from mice for fluorometric 20S proteasome inhibition assays, based on the rate of the chymotryptic subunit cleavage of a pentapeptide attached to a fluorescent molecule (AMP), as described previously (20) . Briefly, the assay uses a fluorescence spectrophotometer to detect fluorescence generated upon adding the fluorogenic peptide substrate specific for the chymotryptic activity of the proteasome.

Cell Cycle.

At time of sacrifice, 1 h after the last drug injection, tumors were excised for cell cycle profile study. Tumors were minced to a single cell suspension using a 70-μm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Cells were first separated by Ficoll-Hypaque density sedimentation, washed in PBS, and then fixed in 70% ethanol and treated with 10 μg/ml RNase (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN). Cells were next stained with propidium iodide (Sigma), and cell cycle profile was determined by flow cytometry using Coulter EPICS XL-MCL. Data were analyzed using the Phoenix flow system.

Histopathology.

At the time of sacrifice, tumors were excised from mice, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, and embedded in paraffin according to standard histological procedures. For MVD assays, 5-μm paraffin sections were used for immunohistochemistry for mouse CD34 expression. Slides were deparaffinized and pretreated with 1.0 mm EDTA, pH 8.0 (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) in a steam pressure cooker (Decloaking chamber; BioCare Medical, Walnut Creek, CA), followed by washing in distilled water. All further steps were performed at room temperature in a hydrated chamber. Slides were treated with peroxidase block (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) for 5 min to quench endogenous peroxidase activity, followed by a 1:5 dilution of goat serum in 50 mm Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), for 20 min to block nonspecific binding sites. Primary rat antimurine CD34 antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was applied at 1:100 dilution in 50 mm Tris-Cl (pH 7.4) with 3% goat serum for 1 h. After washing in 50 mm Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), secondary rabbit antirat antibody (DAKO) was applied at 1:200 dilution in 50 mm Tris-Cl (pH 7.4) with 3% goat serum for 30 min. Slides were washed again in 50 mm Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), and goat antirabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Envision detection kit; DAKO) was applied for 30 min. After further washing, immunoperoxidase staining was developed using a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine chromogen kit (DAKO) and counterstained with hematoxylin.

MVD was determined by light microscopy, according to the procedure of Weidner et al. (21) , without knowledge of the treatment history. Areas of most intense neovascularization were identified by scanning tumor sections at low power magnification (×40) and then counted at high power magnification (×400). At least five separate ×400 fields were analyzed by two investigators in a blinded fashion, using double-headed light microscopy.

The TUNEL assay was performed using the ApopTag kit (Intergen Co., Purchase, NY) on histological specimens fixed in formalin. Nucleotides contained in the reaction buffer were enzymatically added to the DNA using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase catalyzed the addition of nucleotide triphosphates to the 3′-OH ends of double-stranded or single-stranded DNA from apoptotic cells. The incorporated nucleotides formed an oligomer composed of digoxigenin and unlabeled nucleotide. DNA fragments labeled with the digoxigenin nucleotide were then detected by an antidigoxigenin antibody conjugated to peroxidase, allowing the formation of chromogenic substrates visible by light microscopy. H&E staining was also performed on tumor, liver, spleen, bone marrow, heart, lungs, gut, brain, and kidneys and studied for signs of toxicity using light microscopy.

Statistical Analysis.

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the rate of tumor growth in the presence of PS-341. Each experiment included a group of control mice, as well as mice treated at two different doses of PS-341. Each experiment was analyzed separately. For tumor growth, diagnostic plots suggested that models of exponential growth were appropriate to the data. For each experiment, linear mixed-effect models were fit to the natural logarithm of tumor volume over time. This permits the estimation of an exponential parameter governing the rate of growth for each of the three groups of animals in each experiment, with random effects estimated for each animal within a group. Each treatment group was compared with the control, and in each of the experiments, the two treated groups were compared with one another. Overall survival in each experiment was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method, and results are presented as the median overall survival, with 95% CIs. Statistics for the cell cycle were obtained using Fisher’s Exact Probability. Unpaired Student’s t tests were used to calculate the statistical significance of observed differences in MVD between treated and control groups; results are presented as mean ± SE.

RESULTS

PS-341 Decreases Tumor Growth.

Two independent experiments, each using 50 mice, evaluated the effect of escalating doses of PS-341 on tumor cell growth and host survival. The first experiment examined the effect of low doses (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), and the second experiment studied high doses (0.5 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg). Each study had its own independent control cohort treated with the vehicle alone (0.9% normal saline). Mice were inoculated s.c. in the right flank with 3 × 107 RPMI 8226 MM cells, and 82% animals developed a measurable tumor after a mean of 9.2 (6 to 13) days. The average tumor volume was 132.9 mm3 (159.7 mm3 in the first study and 106.0 mm3 in the second) at the beginning of treatment. Mice were then assigned to PS-341 treatment groups [0.05 mg/kg (n = 13), 0.1 mg/kg (n = 15), 0.5 mg/kg (n = 14), or 1.0 mg/kg (n = 14)] or 0.9% normal saline-treated control groups (n = 13 in both experiments). As shown in Fig. 1A ⇓ , animals treated at the two lowest PS-341 doses (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) showed inhibition of tumor growth compared with controls, although this inhibition was not statistically significant in our model. However, statistically significant inhibition of tumor growth was observed in mice treated with PS-341 at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg versus the control group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively; Fig. 1B ⇓ ). In a log-linear model, the daily growth rates were 0.22 for the control mice versus 0.07 and 0.06 for the mice treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg PS-341, respectively. Of note, tumor growth in half of the animals treated with 1.0 mg/kg was completely suppressed for a mean of 9 days. Although tumor growth was not inhibited in animals treated with 0.5 mg/kg, growth was significantly delayed (median, 30 days to reach 2 cm versus 14 days in controls; P < 0.0001). Importantly, complete tumor regression was observed in two mice treated at 1.0 mg/kg and one mouse treated at 0.5 mg/kg of PS-341. However, regrowth of tumor was observed in all mice despite treatment, suggesting the development of drug resistance.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Effect of PS-341 on myeloma cell growth in vivo. BNX mice were inoculated with 3 × 107 RPMI 8226 cells s.c. in the right flank. i.v. twice weekly treatment was started on day 1, when tumors were measurable. Caliper measurements of the longest perpendicular tumor diameters were performed on alternate days to estimate the tumor volume (mean ± SE mm3), using the following formula: 4π/3 × (width/2)2 × (length/2). A, mice were treated with PS-341 at 0.1 mg/kg (n = 15; —) or 0.05 mg/kg (n = 13; ----), or with 0.9% sodium chloride vehicle only (n = 13; ····). B, mice were treated with PS-341 at 1.0 mg/kg (n = 11; —) or 0.5 mg/kg (n = 14; ----), or with vehicle only (n = 13; ····). Bars, SE.

PS-341 Prolongs Survival.

As shown on Fig. 2A ⇓ and as expected from tumor growth results, there was no statistically significant difference in the median overall survival of low-dose PS-341-treated mice versus control animals (P = 0.11). In contrast, a statistically significant prolongation in median overall survival was observed in animals treated with 0.5 mg/kg (P < 0.0001) and 1.0 mg/kg (P < 0.0001) PS-341 versus control animals; median overall survival was 14 days (95% CI, 12–14 days) in the control cohort versus 30 days (95% CI, 21–36 days) and 34 days (95% CI, 24–44 days) in groups treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively (Fig. 2B) ⇓ . There was also a trend toward prolonged survival in mice treated with 1.0 mg/kg PS-341 versus animals in the 0.5 mg/kg treatment group (P = 0.08).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effect of PS-341 on survival. BNX mice were inoculated with 3 × 107 RPMI 8226 cells s.c. in the right flank. i.v. twice weekly treatment was started on day 0, when tumors were measurable. Survival was evaluated from the first day of treatment until death; mice were sacrificed when their tumor diameters reached 2 cm or when they became moribund. A, mice were treated with PS-341 at 0.1 mg/kg (n = 15; —) or 0.05 mg/kg (n = 13; ----), or with 0.9% sodium chloride vehicle only (n = 13; ····). B, mice were treated with PS-341 at 1.0 mg/kg (n = 14; —), 0.5 mg/kg (n = 14; ----, or with vehicle only (n = 13; ····).

PS-341 Induces Apoptosis.

Tumor cells and tumor sections harvested from mice treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg PS-341 showed a statistically significant increase in apoptosis versus controls, as evidenced by cell cycle analysis (Fig. 3, A and B) ⇓ and TUNEL assays (Fig. 3, C and D) ⇓ . Cell cycle analysis was performed on 33 tumors, 22 from mice treated at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg PS-341, and 11 from control animals. Apoptosis, as represented by the sub-G1 fraction (Fig. 3B) ⇓ , was positive in 16 of 22 (73%) tumors examined from PS-341-treated animals versus 1 of 11 (9%) tumors from control animals (P < 0.001, Fisher’s Exact Probability).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

PS-341 induces apoptosis in vivo. Mice were sacrificed 1 h after the last treatment, and tumors were excised for evaluation of cell cycle profile and apoptosis using a TUNEL assay. For cell cycle analysis, tumors were minced to a single-cell suspension, and mononuclear cells were obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque density sedimentation. After cell permeabilization and RNase treatment, cells were stained with propidium iodide, and cell cycle profile was determined using flow cytometry. A, cell cycle profile of tumor harvested from a control mouse. B, cell cycle profile of tumor harvested from a mouse treated with 1 mg/kg PS-341. For TUNEL assay, ApopTag kit was used to examine histological specimens fixed in formalin. C, tumor section from a control mouse tumor at ×400. D, tumor section from a mouse treated with 1 mg/kg PS-341 at ×400.

PS-341 Decreases Blood Vessel Density in Tumors.

Tumor sections from mice treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg PS-341, as well as from control mice (n = 5 in each group), were evaluated for MVD by immunohistochemical analysis for CD34 expression (Figs. 4, A and B) ⇓ . As shown in Fig. 4C ⇓ , there was a statistically significant decrease in MVD in PS-341-treated tumors compared with control tumors: 16.4 ± 2.4 blood vessels/HPF (×400) for controls versus 7.4 ± 1.7 and 6.4 ± 2.1 for the mice treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg PS-341, respectively (P = 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in MVD in tumors from animals treated with 0.5 versus 1.0 mg/kg PS-341 (P = 0.4).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Effect of PS-341 on MVD in tumors. MVD in tumor sections was evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis for mouse CD34 expression within the tumor. A, representative tumor section from a control mouse at ×400. B, representative tumor section from a mouse treated with 1 mg/kg PS-341 at ×400. C, stained tumor sections were examined, and blood vessels were enumerated at ×400 (HPF). Results represent the mean of blood vessel counts of five separate HPFs using light microscopy; bars, SE.

Proteasome Inhibition Assay.

To determine the effect of PS-341 treatment on inhibition of 20S proteasome, tumor, whole blood, spleen, and liver from treated and control mice were collected and processed 1 h after the last treatment. PS-341 induced a dose-dependent decrease in proteasome activity in blood, liver, and spleen (Fig. 5A) ⇓ . The proteasome inhibition by PS-341 (1.0 mg/kg) in normal tissues correlates with the toxicity in mice. Importantly, PS-341 also induced a dose-dependent inhibition of proteasome function in tumors (Fig. 5B) ⇓ .

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Proteasome inhibition assay on mouse tissues and tumor cells harvested from treated hosts. Mice were sacrificed 1 h after treatment, and whole blood, liver, spleen, and tumor were excised for evaluation of proteasome activity. Mice receiving PS-341 at 0.05 mg/kg (▨), 0.1 mg/kg ( Embedded Image), 0.5 mg/kg ( Embedded Image), and 1.0 mg/kg ( Embedded Image) are compared with the control group (□). A, the percentage of proteasome inhibition in whole blood, liver, and spleen was compared in PS-341-treated versus control mice. Bars, SE. B, the percentage of proteasome inhibition in tumor cells was compared in PS-341-treated versus control mice. Bars, SE.

Toxicity.

PS-341 was well tolerated in mice at doses up to 0.5 mg/kg, except for slightly less weight gain than in other groups (data not shown). In contrast, at the highest PS-341 dose (1.0 mg/kg), 2 of 14 (14%) mice became moribund and had to be sacrificed, and 3 (21%) mice lost >10% of their initial body weight; other mice treated at this high dose also did not gain weight normally. H&E staining on histological tissue sections was performed in eight PS-341-treated mice and 9 control mice. Although there was no evidence of toxicity in the liver, kidneys, heart, lungs, or other vital organs, bone marrow histology showed hypoplasia in 37% of mice treated with PS-341 at 1.0 mg/kg compared with no hypoplasia in control mice (P = 0.08, Fisher’s exact probability). However, peripheral blood was also examined, and no reduction in cell counts was seen in PS-341-treated mice compared with control mice (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

Our laboratory has previously published in vitro data demonstrating the potent effects of PS-341 on myeloma cell lines, as well as on primary patient myeloma cells (19) . We have now demonstrated the striking dose-dependent efficacy of PS-341 against a human MM cell line using a recently published in vivo murine xenograft model (22) . Significant inhibition of tumor growth and prolongation of survival was seen in PS-341-treated compared with control mice. To investigate the in vivo effects of PS-341, cell cycle analysis was performed on tumors excised and minced into single-cell suspension. In contrast to the G2-M arrest demonstrated previously in vitro, we did not observe G2-M arrest ex vivo. There was, however, a significant increase in the sub-G1 fraction representing apoptosis, which was confirmed with TUNEL assay performed on histological tumor sections. Because vascular endothelial growth factor production induces angiogenesis as well as myeloma cell proliferation and migration (23) , we assessed MVD on histological sections using antimouse CD34 immunohistochemistry. Our model is particularly suited for studies of neoangiogenesis, with the proangiogenic basement membrane preparation Matrigel used to increase tumorigenicity at the site of tumor cell inoculation. Our results confirmed the antiangiogenic properties of PS-341 demonstrated by Sunwoo et al. (16) and Oikawa et al. (8) .

Using the colorimetric proteasome inhibition assay (20) , our study demonstrated dose-dependent proteasome inhibition in RBCs, liver, and spleen, as well as in tumor cells. The degree of proteasome inhibition was greater in normal tissues, despite minimal toxicity, confirming the increased sensitivity of myeloma cells versus normal cells to proteasome inhibition shown in our previous studies (19) .

The transcription factor NF-κB in myeloma cells regulates drug resistance in tumor cells and adhesion molecule expression on tumor cells and bone marrow stromal cells and related binding, as well as transcription and secretion of myeloma growth and survival factors in the BM milieu (24) . Our laboratory has previously shown inhibition of NF-κB activation in myeloma cells by PS-341, using the nuclear supershift EMSA assay (19) . Sunwoo et al. (16) similarly demonstrated inhibition of NF-κB activation in squamous cell carcinoma cells by PS-341, with significant antitumor activity. Furthermore, Tan and Waldeman (25) showed that PS-341 decreased NF-κB DNA binding activity in adult T-cell leukemia cells by preventing IκBα degradation. Although PS-341 alone did not prolong survival of adult T-cell leukemia-tumor bearing mice, it did add to the effect of the humanized anti-IL-2Rα. Cusack et al. (26) also showed synergy of PS-341 with the topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11, evidenced by inhibition of SN38-induced NF-κB activity. These studies suggest that inhibition of NF-κB plays a role in the antitumor effects of PS-341; however, recent studies from our laboratory using a specific IκB kinase (IKK) inhibitor to selectively block NF-κB activation have shown only partial inhibition of myeloma cell survival (27) . Interestingly, growth of myeloma cells adherent to bone marrow stromal cells, as well as IL-6 secretion triggered by this binding, was completely blocked using this IKK inhibitor. These studies both validate NF-κB as a therapeutic target and suggest that the antimyeloma effects of PS-341 are broader than selective NF-κB blockade. Ongoing gene array and proteomic studies are defining the molecular sequelae of PS-341 in myeloma cells to define mechanisms of drug sensitivity versus resistance. Our preliminary in vitro studies suggest that PS-341 down-regulates growth and survival kinases, induces apoptotic cascades, inhibits the proteasome-ubiquitin pathway, and induces stress responses. Importantly, the current animal study confirms that PS-341 induces tumor cell apoptosis, suppression of neoangiogenesis, and dose-dependent proteasome inhibition in vivo. Using this model, gene profiling and proteomic studies will similarly define in vivo targets of PS-341 and allow for the development of more potent targeted and less toxic therapeutics.

PS-341 has recently been evaluated in a Phase II trial as treatment of patients with relapsed refractory myeloma (28) . Preliminary analysis in 54 patients who completed a minimum of two cycles of therapy showed that PS-341 induced either stabilization of disease or a reduction in myeloma paraprotein in 46 (85%) patients, with a favorable toxicity profile. Future studies will evaluate PS-341 treatment for patients with myeloma earlier in their disease course, as initial treatment or treatment of first relapse. Moreover, a Phase III trial is planned to compare PS-341 versus dexamethasone treatment for relapsed myeloma. In addition, our preclinical studies demonstrate that PS-341 has enhanced antimyeloma activity when combined with conventional (dexamethasone) or novel (immunomodulatory derivatives of thalidomide, IMiD) therapies, providing the framework for clinical trials of combination therapies.

PS-341, therefore, represents a novel class of myeloma therapy and is the first proteasome inhibitor to be used in clinical trials. Numerous animal studies have shown efficacy of PS-341 in various tumor cell lines, and synergistic antitumor activity has been demonstrated for PS-341 in combination with other chemotherapy. The current study provides strong in vivo evidence supporting use of PS-341 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma and will serve as a model both to evaluate potential combination therapies, as well as for delineating the in vivo molecular mechanism of antimyeloma activity of PS-341, ultimately allowing for the development of next-generation, more potent and targeted therapies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Roderick T. Bronson at the Rodent Histopathology Core, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, for mouse histopathological studies and Dr. Jeffery L. Kutok at the Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, for TUNEL assays and MVD evaluations.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Awards (to R. L., T. H., C. S. M., and N. M.), NIH Grants ROI50947 and POI78378, and the Doris Duke Distinguished Clinical Research Scientist Award (to K. C. A.).

  • ↵2 These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: kenneth_anderson{at}dfci.harvard.edu

  • ↵4 The abbreviations used are: MM, multiple myeloma; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; BNX, beige-nude-xid; MVD, microvessel density; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling; CI, confidence interval; HPF, high power field.

  • Received April 24, 2002.
  • Accepted July 5, 2002.
  • ©2002 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Reits E. A., Benham A. M., Plougastel B., Neefjes J., Trowsdale J. Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells. EMBO J., 16: 6087-6094, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  2. ↵
    Peters J. M., Franke W. W., Kleinschmidt J. A. Distinct 19 S and 20 S subcomplexes of the 26 S proteasome and their distribution in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 7709-7718, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Coux O., Tanaka K., Goldberg A. L. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 65: 801-847, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    King R. W., Deshaies R. J., Peters J. M., Kirschner M. W. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science (Wash. DC), 274: 1652-1659, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Orlowski R. Z. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ., 6: 303-313, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Read M. A., Neish A. S., Luscinskas F. W., Palombella V. J., Maniatis T., Collins T. The proteasome pathway is required for cytokine-induced endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule expression. Immunity, 2: 493-506, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Desterro J. M., Rodriguez M. S., Hay R. T. Regulation of transcription factors by protein degradation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 57: 1207-1219, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Oikawa T., Sasaki T., Nakamura M., Shimamura M., Tanahashi N., Omura S., Tanaka K. The proteasome is involved in angiogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 246: 243-248, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Niedermann G., Geier E., Lucchiari-Hartz M., Hitziger N., Ramsperger A., Eichmann K. The specificity of proteasomes: impact on MHC class I processing and presentation of antigens. Immunol. Rev., 172: 29-48, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    DeMartino G. N., Slaughter C. A. The proteasome, a novel protease regulated by multiple mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 22123-22126, 1999.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Orlowski M., Wilk S. Catalytic activities of the 20 S proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 383: 1-16, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Dou Q. P., Li B. Proteasome inhibitors as potential novel anticancer agents. Drug Resist. Update, 2: 215-223, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Rivett A. J., Gardner R. C. Proteasome inhibitors: from in vitro uses to clinical trials. J. Pept. Sci., 6: 478-488, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Orlowski R. Z., Eswara J. R., Lafond-Walker A., Grever M. R., Orlowski M., Dang C. V. Tumor growth inhibition induced in a murine model of human Burkitt’s lymphoma by a proteasome inhibitor. Cancer Res., 58: 4342-4348, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Adams J., Palombella V. J., Sausville E. A., Johnson J., Destree A., Lazarus D. D., Maas J., Pien C. S., Prakash S., Elliott P. J. Proteasome inhibitors: a novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents. Cancer Res., 59: 2615-2622, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Sunwoo J. B., Chen Z., Dong G., Yeh N., Bancroft C. C., Sausville E., Adams J., Elliott P., Waes C. V. Novel proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits activation of nuclear factor-κB, cell survival, tumor growth, and angiogenesis in squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 1419-1428, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Shah S. A., Potter M. W., McDade T. P., Ricciardi R., Perugini R. A., Elliott P. J., Adams J., Callery M. P. 26S proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis and limits growth of human pancreatic cancer. J. Cell. Biochem., 82: 110-122, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Myung J., Kim K. B., Crews C. M. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and proteasome inhibitors. Med. Res. Rev., 21: 245-273, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Hideshima T., Richardson P., Chauhan D., Vito J., Palombella J., Elliott P. J., Adams J., Anderson K. C. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces apoptosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res., 61: 3071-3076, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Lightcap E. S., McCormack T. A., Pien C. S., Chau V., Adams J., Elliott P. J. Proteasome inhibition measurements: clinical application. Clin. Chem., 46: 673-683, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Weidner N., Semple J. P., Welch W. R., Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis—correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med., 324: 1-8, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Lentzsch S., Rogers M. S., LeBlanc R., Birsner A. E., Shah J. H., Treston A. M., Anderson K. C., D’Amato R. J. 3-Amino-phthalimido-glutarimide inhibits angiogenesis and growth of B-cell neoplasias in mice. Cancer Res., 62: 2300-2305, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Podar K., Tai Y., Davies F. E., Lentzsch S., Sattler M., Hideshima T., Lin B. K., Gupta D., Shima Y., Chauhan D., Mitsiades C., Raje N., Richardson P., Anderson K. C. Vascular endothelial growth factor triggers signaling cascades mediating multiple myeloma cell growth and migration. Blood, 98: 428-435, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Mitsiades N., Mitsiades C. S., Poulaki V., Chauhan D., Richardson P. G., Hideshima T., Munshi N., Treon S. P., Anderson K. C. Biologic sequelae of NF-κB blockade in multiple myeloma: therapeutic application. Blood, 99: 4079-4086, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Tan C., Waldeman T. A. Proteasome inhibitor PS-341, a potential therapeutic agent for adult T-cell leukemia. Cancer Res., 62: 1083-1086, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Cusack J. C., Liu R., Houston M., Abendroth K., Elliott P. J., Adams J., Baldwin A. S. Enhanced chemosensitivity to CPT-11 with proteasome inhibitor PS-341: implications for systemic nuclear factor-κB inhibition. Cancer Res., 61: 3535-3540, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Hideshima T., Chauhan D., Richardson P., Mitsiades C., Mitsiades N., Hayashi T., Munshi N., Dong L., Castro A., Palombella V., Adams J., Anderson K. C. NF-κB as a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 16639-16647, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Richardson P. G., Barenson J., Irwin D., Jagannath S., Traynor A., Rajkumar V., Alsina M., Kuter D., Srkalovic G., Siegle D., Barlogie B., Alexanian R., Orlowski R., Esseltine D., Kauffman M., Adams J., Schenkein D. P., Anderson K. C. Phase II study of PS-341, a novel proteasome inhibitor, alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma who have relapsed following front-line therapy and are refractory to their most recent therapy. Blood, 98: 774a 2001.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 62 (17)
September 2002
Volume 62, Issue 17
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 Inhibits Human Myeloma Cell Growth in Vivo and Prolongs Survival in a Murine Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
Citation Tools
Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 Inhibits Human Myeloma Cell Growth in Vivo and Prolongs Survival in a Murine Model
Richard LeBlanc, Laurence P. Catley, Teru Hideshima, Suzanne Lentzsch, Constantine S. Mitsiades, Nicholas Mitsiades, Donna Neuberg, Olga Goloubeva, Christine S. Pien, Julian Adams, Deepak Gupta, Paul G. Richardson, Nikhil C. Munshi and Kenneth C. Anderson
Cancer Res September 1 2002 (62) (17) 4996-5000;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 Inhibits Human Myeloma Cell Growth in Vivo and Prolongs Survival in a Murine Model
Richard LeBlanc, Laurence P. Catley, Teru Hideshima, Suzanne Lentzsch, Constantine S. Mitsiades, Nicholas Mitsiades, Donna Neuberg, Olga Goloubeva, Christine S. Pien, Julian Adams, Deepak Gupta, Paul G. Richardson, Nikhil C. Munshi and Kenneth C. Anderson
Cancer Res September 1 2002 (62) (17) 4996-5000;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antitumor Effect by Interleukin-11 Receptor α-Locus Chemokine/CCL27, Introduced into Tumor Cells through a Recombinant Adenovirus Vector
  • Mammary Carcinoma Suppression by Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein-II
  • E1A, E1B Double-restricted Adenovirus for Oncolytic Gene Therapy of Gallbladder Cancer
Show more Experimental Therapeutics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement