Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Gene Expression Profiling of Favorable Histology Wilms Tumors and Its Correlation with Clinical Features

Masayuki Takahashi, Ximing J. Yang, Todd T. Lavery, Kyle A. Furge, Bart O. Williams, Maria Tretiakova, Anthony Montag, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Gian G. Re, A. Julian Garvin, Stefan Söderhäll, Susumu Kagawa, Debra Hazel-Martin, Agneta Nordenskjold and Bin Tean Teh
Masayuki Takahashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ximing J. Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Todd T. Lavery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle A. Furge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bart O. Williams
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Tretiakova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony Montag
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas J. Vogelzang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gian G. Re
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Julian Garvin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan Söderhäll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susumu Kagawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra Hazel-Martin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Agneta Nordenskjold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bin Tean Teh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published November 2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    A, clustering of 15 WTs and clinical information; B, three-dimensional clustering of these cases. The clustering of patients (using Pearson’s correlation) is based on global gene expression profiles consisting of median polished data of 5,594 well-measured spots. The tumors clustered into approximately two main groups with one group consisting of mostly tumors with high stage (stage III, IV) and the other consisting of mostly tumors with low stage (stage I, II). Among high-stage tumors, two patients who died of cancer (Wilms 6, 15) and one patient who had recurrence (Wilms 11) were closely clustered together. One patient (Wilms 14 in A and represented by orange circle in B), who had stage II disease but developed recurrence and died of cancer, was clustered with high-stage tumors. Abbreviations in A: D, died from disease; A, alive; R, recurrence; N/A, not available; NE, no evidence of recurrence.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The 30 cDNAs that are significantly differentially expressed between high stage (stage III, IV) and low stage (stage I, II), with the clustering of the 30 cDNA expression levels. Rows, individual cDNA; columns, individual tumor samples. The color of each square, the median-polished, normalized ratio of gene expression in a tumor relative to noncancerous kidney tissue: red, expression levels greater than the median; green, expression levels below the median; black, expression levels equal to the median; gray, inadequate or missing data. The color saturation indicates the degree of divergence from the median. The estimated FDR for this set of genes (α ≤ 0.05) is 9.0%.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Real-time relative quantitative PCR analysis of Topo IIα (A), IGF II (IB), stathmin 1 (C), Integrin α-8 (D), CRABP2 (E), DBCCR1 (F). The left side bar in black of each sample, the expression ratio of tumor to noncancerous kidney by real-time PCR; the right side bar in white, the expression ratio of tumor to noncancerous kidney by microarray experiments. Data grouped based on clinical parameters are given as the mean and the SE. They are evaluated statistically using the Mann-Whitney U test. Real-time PCR was performed in triplicate and each expression data were normalized against the endogenous control, 18S rRNA. The data were averaged and compared with microarray data. Topo IIα and IGF II express much higher in WT compared with noncancerous kidney through all of the samples by microarray and real-time PCR. Real-time PCR showed a higher expression ratio of Topo IIα(P = 0.0771) in high-stage tumors, and IGF II was significantly more highly expressed in high-stage tumors (P = 0.0251; A and B). Stathmin 1 and integrin α-8 were overexpressed in most WTs and were significantly more highly expressed in high-stage tumors (P = 0.0451 and 0.0133, respectively; C and D). CRABP2 and DBCCR1 were also overexpressed in most WTs. DBCCR1 was significantly more highly expressed in WT with poor outcome compared with reference (P = 0.0335; F) and CRABP2 tended to be more highly expressed in WT with poor outcome (P = 0.079; E). All of the real-time PCR data were consistent with microarray data.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Significantly overexpressed genes in WTs

    Top 40 cDNAs that are significantly overexpressed in Wilms tumors (n = 15). A sign test for a one-sample mean was used to identify genes whose expression changed at least 2-fold in a significant number of samples (α ≤ 0.001).

    Accession IDaGene nameAverage foldb (T/N)
    AA026682Topo (DNA) ii α (Mr 170,000)80.8
    H98218high-mobility group (nonhistone chromosomal) protein36.2
    AA504348Topo (DNA) ii α (Mr 170,000)32.1
    AA419229G protein-coupled receptor 39 (GPR39)25.2
    AA701455centromere protein F (Mr 350,000/400,000, mitosin) (CENPF)25.1
    AA071486serine/threonine kinase 12 (STK12)23.5
    N67487microfibrillar-associated protein 2 (MFAP2)22.1
    N74623IGF II (somatomedin A)21.9
    W68220 ESTs 18.5
    AA460685baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 5 (survivin)16.2
    H73968 chromosome 20 open reading frame 1 C20orf1 15.3
    N40940 transmembrane protein with EGF-like 15.3
    AA598674 ESTs 14.5
    AA430744enhancer of zeste (Drosophila) homolog 2 (EZH2)12.7
    AA598945metallocarboxypeptidase CPX-1 (CPX-1)12.4
    AA598974not found12.0
    AA873060stathmin 1/oncoprotein 18 (STMN1)11.4
    AA598508 CRABP2 11.2
    W58368eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B, subunit 311.2
    T67524zinc finger protein 205 (ZNF205)11.1
    AA629262 ESTs 11.0
    AA485665ephrin-B3 (EFNB3), mRNA, EPHRIN B1,2,311.0
    AA449336 ESTs 10.9
    H80685 p311 10.4
    AA430032 ESTs 10.4
    N91887thymosin β identified in neuroblastoma cells10.1
    N94616laminin α 4 (LAMA4)9.8
    AA454572minichromosome maintenance deficient (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) 29.5
    AA700832retinol-binding protein 1, cellular (RBP1)9.5
    T87341 ESTs 9.5
    H92234 ESTs 9.3
    AA102130ectodermal-neural cortex (with BTB-like domain)9.2
    AA598610mesoderm-specific transcript (mouse) homolog (MEST)8.9
    AA460849 mitochondrial ribosomal protein L9 8.8
    R62603collagen type VI α3 (COL6A3)8.7
    AA101875chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2 (versican) (CSPG2)8.6
    R85090ectodermal-neural cortex (with BTB-like domain)8.4
    R45941protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type, N8.1
    R41787cadherin 13, H-cadherin (heart) (CDH13)8.0
    AA453170 hypothetical protein FLJ14299 7.9
    • a ID, identification.

    • b Average fold shows the interquartile mean of the tumor versus non-cancerous tissue (T/N) gene expression values.

    • c EST, expressed sequence tag.

  • Table 2

    Differentially expressed genes between different outcome groups at 5 yearsa

    A total of 80 cDNAs were found to be differentially expressed between the different outcome groups at 5 years.

    Accession IDbGene nameFold changecPFDRd (%)
    AA131240 EST 6.40.00010.1
    AA598508 CRABP2 5.60.01303.9
    AA621201solute carrier family 30 (zinc transporter) member 35.20.01104.1
    H10959deleted in bladder cancer chromosome region candidate5.10.01704.7
    AA448394Homo sapiens mRNA for KIAA1783 protein, partial cds−4.40.00010.1
    AA436401TU3A protein (TU3A)4.20.01804.6
    R98074betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase 2 (BHMT2)−4.20.00010.1
    AA454572minichromosome maintenance deficient (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) 23.90.00933.1
    AA252470 Homo sapiens cDNA FLJ11606 fis −3.70.00010.1
    AA600214putative integral membrane transporter (LC27)3.70.02906.4
    H93086 EST −3.50.00472.1
    AA456088 EPHB3 3.40.02906.4
    AA446005 DKFZP434N061 protein −3.30.00010.1
    AA449463 PI-3-kinase-related kinase SMG-1 −3.30.00401.9
    T94293ESTs, highly similar to PA2X−3.30.00401.9
    H21943 thymopoietin 3.20.03007.1
    N91887thymosin β identified in neuroblastoma cells3.10.03607.1
    R73672Homo sapiens, clone IMAGE:38815493.10.01404.1
    T67045 DKFZP434N061 protein −3.10.00010.1
    N52394 hypothetical protein FLJ20008 −30.03007
    N53581phosphodiesterase 4C, cAMP-specific−30.00010.1
    N21550 EST −2.90.00010.1
    T86714 EST −2.90.03507
    AA487590 novel human gene mapping to chromosome 13 −2.80.04608.7
    H19105ESTs, weakly similar to TNP12.80.00010.1
    H84154cyclin D2 (CCND2)2.80.04508.7
    W15574 EST −2.80.00562.1
    AA062802 KIAA0354 KELCH-related 2.70.00010.1
    AA481758heat shock Mr 40,000 protein 1 (HSPF1)2.70.00010.1
    AA490144 EST 2.70.00010.1
    H10045vav3 oncogene (VAV3)−2.70.01604.3
    R31673 EST −2.70.00502
    R97226 PI-3-kinase-related kinase SMG-1 −2.70.01404
    T91807 FLJ10154 −2.70.00010.1
    T99793 meningioma-expressed antigen 6 −2.70.00401.9
    AA429657 KIAA0080 protein 2.60.02405.6
    AA478950 nuclear factor of activated T-cells 5 −2.60.00010.1
    AA844831carboxypeptidase A2 (pancreatic) (CPA2)2.60.01904.8
    N69661TPA-regulated locus−2.60.00010.1
    R55334ESTs, weakly similar to B34087 hypothetical protein−2.60.00010.1
    • a The 40 most differential expressed cDNAs between the two groups.

    • b ID, identification.

    • c A positive fold change indicates the poor outcome group had relatively higher expression; a negative value indicates the good outcome group had relatively higher expression.

    • d An estimate of the FDR shown for each gene.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 62 (22)
November 2002
Volume 62, Issue 22
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gene Expression Profiling of Favorable Histology Wilms Tumors and Its Correlation with Clinical Features
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Gene Expression Profiling of Favorable Histology Wilms Tumors and Its Correlation with Clinical Features
Masayuki Takahashi, Ximing J. Yang, Todd T. Lavery, Kyle A. Furge, Bart O. Williams, Maria Tretiakova, Anthony Montag, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Gian G. Re, A. Julian Garvin, Stefan Söderhäll, Susumu Kagawa, Debra Hazel-Martin, Agneta Nordenskjold and Bin Tean Teh
Cancer Res November 15 2002 (62) (22) 6598-6605;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gene Expression Profiling of Favorable Histology Wilms Tumors and Its Correlation with Clinical Features
Masayuki Takahashi, Ximing J. Yang, Todd T. Lavery, Kyle A. Furge, Bart O. Williams, Maria Tretiakova, Anthony Montag, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Gian G. Re, A. Julian Garvin, Stefan Söderhäll, Susumu Kagawa, Debra Hazel-Martin, Agneta Nordenskjold and Bin Tean Teh
Cancer Res November 15 2002 (62) (22) 6598-6605;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • High Prevalence of BRAF Gene Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas and Thyroid Tumor Cell Lines
  • Identification of Interleukin 8 as an Inhibitor of Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand-induced Apoptosis in the Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Line OVCAR3
  • FUS/ERG Gene Fusions in Ewing’s Tumors
Show more Molecular Biology and Genetics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement