Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Biology and Genetics

Genetic Interactions between the Wilms’ Tumor 1 Gene and the p53 Gene

Aswin L. Menke, Alan R. Clarke, Andrea Leitch, Annemieke Ijpenberg, Kathy A. Williamson, Lee Spraggon, David J. Harrison and Nicholas D. Hastie
Aswin L. Menke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan R. Clarke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Leitch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annemieke Ijpenberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathy A. Williamson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee Spraggon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Harrison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas D. Hastie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published November 2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In recent years, a number of proteins have been identified that can modify the activities of the Wilms’ Tumor 1 (WT1) proteins. One of these modifiers is the p53 protein. To investigate a genetic interaction between the p53 gene and the wt1 gene, we have crossed their respective knockout mice. The absence of p53 appears to have no gross effect on the phenotype of wt1-null mice. Both wt1-null and double-null embryos develop pericardial bleeding and die in utero. In adult p53-null mice, wt1-heterozygosity (wt1het) predisposes to an earlier onset of lymphomagenesis and the development of kidney abnormalities resembling oncocytoma in humans. wt1-heterozygosity alone predisposes to the development of glomerular sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION

The WT1 3 gene contains 10 exons and specifies a 3-kb mRNA that can encode for 24 different isoforms as a result of alternative splicing, RNA editing, and the presence of three alternative translational initiation sites (1) . WT1 has been detected in many tissues (2) , and disruptions of its biological function may lead the development of tumors, e.g., Wilms’ tumor.

In recent years, a number of proteins have been identified that can modify the biological activities of WT1, one of which is the p53 protein. At present, it is unclear whether P53 and WT1 physically interact (3 , 4) , but several lines of evidence suggest that P53 and WT1 do affect each other’s biological activities. P53 can alter the transcriptional activity of WT1 (4) and is found to be mutated in anaplastic Wilms’ tumors, a more malignant form of Wilms’ tumor (5) . In turn, WT1 can stabilize P53, affect the transcriptional activity of P53 and rescue cells from P53-induced apoptosis (4 , 6) .

To investigate a genetic interaction between wt1 and p53, we have crossed p53-knockout mice (7) with wt1-knockout mice (8) . wt1 expression has been detected in a number of tumor types that also develop in p53-null mice (9 , 10 , 11) , including lung adenocarcinomas (12) , mammary carcinomas (13) , embryonal carcinomas (14) , Leydig cell tumors (15) , and lymphomas (16) . The status of wt1 may, therefore, have an effect on the development of these tumors in p53-null mice. We also hypothesized that the cross might predispose to the development of Wilms’ tumor because some Li-Fraumeni patients develop this type of tumor (17) .

Conversely, the status of p53 may also have an effect on the phenotype of the wt1-null mice. For example, blastema cells in the wt1-null mouse undergo apoptosis (8) . Because of the role of p53 in certain apoptotic pathways, these cells may not go into apoptosis in the absence of p53.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Generation of p53- and wt1-deficient Mice.

Both the wt1-knockout and the p53-knockout mice were of mixed genetic backgrounds (CBA, SWR, 129/Ola, C57/BL6, BalB/c). To minimize possible effects of genetic variation (10 , 18 , 19) , male wt1het/p53-null mice were crossed with female p53-null mice. In this way, each litter contributed equally to the genetic pool of both the wt1het/p53-null cohort and the p53-null cohort. To be able to compare the p53het cohort with the wt1het/p53het cohort we used the same principle. This time male wt1het mice were crossed with female p53-null mice. Similarly, male wt1het-mice were crossed with female wild-type mice to be able to compare the wt1het cohort with the wild-type cohort.

The mice were screened at least three times a week for overt pathological signs. Sick mice were killed by cervical dislocation and underwent autopsy. All of the major organs and any tumor identified were sampled, fixed in 10% formalin, and processed to wax. Sections, 4 μm thick, were cut and mounted on glass slides and, after dewaxing, were stained with H&E (20) . In addition, tumor material was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80° for immunophenotyping and RNA extraction.

wt1-null embryos were obtained by crossing wt1het/p53het mice with one another and by crossing wt1het mice with one another. Double-null embryos were obtained by crossing wt1het/p53-null mice with one another. The embryos were fixed in 10% formalin and processed for histopathology, as described above.

Immunophenotyping.

This was done as described previously (21) . Cells were stained using monoclonal antibodies (EACC, Porton Down, UK) and were washed and then incubated with antimouse immunoglobulin labeled with FITC (Serotec United Kingdom Ltd.). Analysis was carried out by selecting a viable cell bitmap using forward and right-angle light scatter. Cells (105) within the bitmap were counted, and the results expressed as the percentage of positive cells.

Analysis of RNA Transcripts (RT-PCR).

RNA was isolated from thymic lymphomas using an RNA extraction kit from Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc. (Columbia, MD). Single-strand cDNA was made from 1 μg of total RNA, and amplification reactions were set up with one- twentieth of the cDNA. WT1 mRNA expression was analyzed with two primer sets, as follows: primer set 1: L966, 5′-ACA-GGT-GTG-CTG-TCT-TGG-AA-3′ (Exon 8), and L967, 5′-CCA-CAC-CAG-GAC-TCA-TAC-AG-3′ (Exon 10); primer set 2: J421, 5′-CCA-CAC-CAG-GAC-TCA-TAC-AG-3′ (Exon 9), and J420, 5′-TGC-ATG-TTG-TGA-TGG-CGG-AC-3′ (Exon 10). GAPDH mRNA expression was analyzed with primer set 108, 5′-ACC-ACA-GTC-CAT-GCC-ATC-AC-3′, and 109, 5′-TCC-ACC-ACC-CTG-TTG-CTG-TA-3′.

Conditions of amplifications were 25 cycles (primer set L966/L967 and primer set 108/109) or 30 cycles (primer set J420/J421) of amplification starting with a denaturing step of 2.5 min at 94°C and ending with an 8-min final extension at 72°C. The cycles were initiated by denaturing the first-strand cDNA at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 45 s at 56°C, and extending for 1 min. at 72°C.

RESULTS

Generation of p53- and wt1-deficient Mice.

Male newborn mice of the different crosses were recovered at the expected Mendelian frequency (Fig. 1A) ⇓ . In agreement with previous findings (22 , 23) , we found that in the absence of p53, there was a significant reduction in the number of females (χ2 test, P = 0.005) with a proportion of female embryos developing exencephaly (Fig. 1B) ⇓ .

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

In the absence of p53, some female embryos develop exencephaly. A, ratio between newborn males and females of the different genotypes. In the absence of p53, there is a significant reduction in the number of females (P = 0.005). B, morphology of E13.5 embryos with exencephaly (arrows) and without. ×4.

No newborn wt1-null mice or double-null (wt1-null/p53-null) mice were obtained. Histopathological analysis showed that the absence of p53 had no gross effect on the phenotype of wt1-null mice. Both wt1-null and double-null embryos developed pericardial bleeding and died in utero. However, in contrast to wt1-null embryos, double-null embryos did not survive beyond 11.5 days (Table 1 ⇓ , Fig. 2 ⇓ ). Extensive morphological analysis of these embryos, however, did not reveal any mechanism associated with this earlier mortality.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Morphological and histological analysis of p53-null and double-null embryos. A, morphology of a p53-null, a wt1-null, and a double-null embryo (E13.5). B, morphology of a p53-null, a wt1-het/p53-null and a double-null embryo (E13.5). C, cross-section of the heart of a p53-null embryo (E11.5). D, cross-section of the heart of a double-null embryo (E11.5). In the double-null embryo, the heart ventricle has dilated and its ventricle wall is thin. Pericardial bleeding can be observed. E, cross-section of a double null embryo (E11.5) showing the wolffian duct. F, cross-section of a double null embryo (E11.5) showing the blastema. The sections were stained with H&E, as described in the “Materials and Methods” section: 1, pericardial space; 2, pericardium; 3, ventricle wall; 4, cloaca; 5, mesonephric (Wolffian) duct before entry into cloaca; 6, Wolffian duct; 7, blastema. ×20.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Embryogenesis

The ureteric bud was absent in both the wt1-null and the double-null embryos (Fig. 2E) ⇓ . In contrast to our hypothesis that the status of p53 may affect the apoptosis of the blastema cells, we found no differences between the blastemas of E11.5-day-old wt1-null embryos and double-null embryos (Fig. 2F) ⇓ .

wt1het/p53-null Mice Develop Disease Earlier Than p53-null Mice.

We found that the disease-free survival of female p53-null mice was reduced in comparison with that of male p53-null mice (Anderson Darling Test/χ2 test, P = 0.012). We, therefore, plotted the disease-free survival curves of the males and females separately (Fig. 3) ⇓ . The wt1het/p53-null mice succumbed earlier than the p53-null mice (P = 0.02; Fig. 3, A and B ⇓ ). More than 90% of both the p53-null and the wt1het/p53-null mice developed lymphomas, predominantly involving the thymus (Table 2) ⇓ . In addition, ∼15% of each cohort developed sarcomas, mainly hemangiosarcomas and osteosarcomas. These percentages were the same for both male and female mice.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Survival curves of Wt1het/p53-null and p53-null mice. A, male wt1het/p53-null mice versus male p53-null mice. B, female wt1het/p53-null mice versus female p53-null mice.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Tumors and phenotypes of the deceased mice

wt1het/p53-null Mice Develop Oncocytoma and Glomerular Sclerosis.

In addition to the observed lymphomas and sarcomas, the wt1het/p53-null mice also developed kidney abnormalities (Fig. 4) ⇓ . Twenty % developed epithelial neoplasms that resemble oncocytomas in humans (24) . Three % developed glomerular sclerosis (Table 2) ⇓ . Regarding the development of oncocytomas, preneoplastic lesions and small neoplasms could be distinguished. The preneoplastic lesions were characterized by columnar tubule cells with densely eosinophilic cytoplasm and with nuclei of regular size and shape (Fig. 4B) ⇓ . In the case of the small neoplasms (Fig. 4C) ⇓ , the epithelial cells of the dilated tubule were irregular in size and shape, and there was some nuclear pleomorphism. No kidney abnormalities could be detected in the p53-null mice.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Kidney sections of p53-null and wt1het/p53-null mice. A, normal p53-null kidney. B, wt1het/p53-null kidney showing preneoplastic tubule cells. C, wt1het/p53-null kidney section showing neoplastic tubule cells. D, wt1het/p53-null kidney section showing glomerular sclerosis. The sections were stained with H&E, as described in “Materials and Methods.” 1, glomerulus; 2, preneoplastic and neoplastic tubule cells; 3, extra-glomerular matrix. ×20.

wt1het/p53-null Mice Have an Earlier Onset of Lymphoma Development.

The presence of oncocytomas could not explain the difference in disease-free survival between the wt1het/p53-null mice and the p53-null mice. Only 20% of the wt1het/p53-null mice developed these lesions, and only very small areas of the kidneys were affected. We hypothesized that accelerated lymphomagenesis could explain the reduced survival of the wt1het/p53-null mice. In agreement with this hypothesis, we found that male wt1het/p53-null mice of four randomly selected litters, became ill before their male p53-null littermates (Table 3 ⇓ ; Sign test, P = 0.06). The wt1het/p53-null mice in these litters had developed overt lymphoma, whereas no lymphoma could be detected in the p53-null mice.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Onset of lymphoma and phenotypes of the deceased mice

WT1 Is Expressed in Thymic Lymphomas.

To test whether the loss of wt1 expression could explain the differences in the onset of lymphoma development, we performed RT-PCR on thymic lymphoma samples derived from the p53-null and wt1het/p53-null mice. To avoid saturation of the PCR, the number of PCR cycles were varied (20, 25, 30, and 35 cycles; Fig. 5 ⇓ ). Twelve samples of each cohort were analyzed in this way. In both cohorts, WT1 could still be detected in 84% of the samples. We found no correlation between the relative expression levels of wt1, the onset of disease, and the diameter of the tumor.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

RT-PCR expression analysis in thymic lymphomas. cDNA was amplified using the following primer sets: A: L966/L967 (WT1); B, 108/109 (GAPDH); C, J420/J421 (WT1). The PCR products were run on a 2% (A and B) or a 4% (C) agarose gel. The bands were visualized with ethidium bromide and were of the correct size. Using primer set J420/J421, one can distinguish between the wt1 splice variant containing nine nucleotides between zincfinger 9 and 10 (band 114) and lacking the nine nucleotides between zinc finger 9 and 10 (band 105). As a positive control, Wt1 cDNAs were included lacking the 9 nucleotides (−KTS) and containing the nine nucleotides (+KTS).

wt1het Does Not Affect the Differentiation of Thymic Lymphoma Cells.

Because WT1 may play a role during hematopoiesis (25) , we investigated the expression of a number of differentiation markers in nine wt1het/p53-null thymic lymphomas and 15 p53-null thymic lymphomas (Table 4) ⇓ . We found no correlation between the expression pattern of the markers and the genotype or age of the mice.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Immunophenotyping of thymic lymphoma cells

wt1het Predisposes to the Development of Oncocytomas Only in the Absence of p53.

We hypothesized that the effect of WT1 might be more pronounced in mice with a less severe phenotype than p53-null mice. We, therefore, compared p53het mice with wt1het/p53het mice. No significant differences in disease-free survival were observed between the sexes, and the males and females were, therefore, included in the same cohort. Both cohorts developed the same, sex-independent tumor types (Table 2) ⇓ . In addition, 13% of the wt1het/p53het mice also developed severe glomerular sclerosis. The latter, together with the small increase in the number of lymphomas, may explain why the wt1het/p53het mice succumbed earlier than the p53het mice (Fig. 6A) ⇓ . Although the number of informative cases is small, no oncocytomas could be detected in the wt1het/p53het mice, which suggests that wt1het only predisposes to the development of these neoplasms in the complete absence of p53.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Survival curves. A, p53het versus wt1het/p53het mice. B, wt1het versus wildtype mice.

wt1het Predisposes to the Development of Glomerular Sclerosis.

To determine whether the observed glomerular sclerosis was the result of a genetic interaction between p53 and wt1, we analyzed wt1het-mice and their wild-type littermates in a control experiment. To our surprise, we found that the wt1het-mice succumbed earlier than their wild-type littermates (Fig. 6B) ⇓ . Again, we found no significant differences in survival between the sexes, and the males and females were, therefore, included in the same cohorts. Eighteen % of the wt1het mice died within 250 days, compared with only 1% of their wild-type littermates. Despite intensive screening of the mice, the wt1het mice were found either moribund or dead in their cage, which indicated a rapid progression from the first symptoms of sickness to death. The cause of death could not be determined in about 1% of both wild-type and wt1het mice. Eighty % of the other deceased wt1het-mice suffered from severe glomerular sclerosis (Table 2) ⇓ . Interestingly, the remaining 20% of the wt1het mice developed lymphoma. Although the number of mice is small, this suggests that wt1 heterozygosity alone may already predispose to the development of lymphoma.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have investigated the genetic interaction between p53 and wt1 by crossing their respective knockout mice. The absence of p53 appeared to have no gross effect on the development of the wt1-null embryos. Both wt1-null and double-null embryos died in utero, probably as a result of pericardial bleeding. However, in contrast to the analyzed wt1-null embryos, no double-null embryos survived beyond E11.5. Extensive morphological analysis of these embryos, however, did not reveal any mechanism associated with earlier mortality.

wt1het/p53-null Mice Have an Earlier Onset of Lymphoma Development.

The disease-free survival of wt1het/p53-null mice is markedly reduced compared with p53-null mice, probably because of the earlier onset of lymphoma development (Tables 2 ⇓ and 3) ⇓ . The results indicate that WT1 may function as a tumor suppressor in lymphoma development. In agreement with such a role, WT1 expression has been detected in the thymus (26) and in a number of T-lymphoid cell lines (27 , 28) but was found to be very low or absent in most T-lymphoid tumors (16) . In the present study, wt1 can still be detected with RT-PCR in 84% of the lymphomas with no clear differences in expression levels between the lymphoma samples of wt1het/p53-null and p53-null mice. Thus far, sequence analyses have revealed no wt1 mutations in the lymphomas of either cohort (data not shown).

It is clear that within the thymus, p53 is essential for the elimination, via apoptosis, of DNA-damaged cells (7 , 29) , and it appears that loss of apoptotic pathways is critical to tumor formation within this cell type (30) . We hypothesize that WT1 exerts its effect on lymphomagenesis by affecting the apoptotic pathway, but the exact mechanism remains to be elucidated. WT1 can induce apoptosis (31 , 14) and can do so independently of the status of p53 (32) . WT1 has been shown to regulate a number of genes that play an important role in the induction or inhibition of apoptosis (1) . Interestingly, several of these genes, like IGF-II, IGF-IR, and Bcl-2, are also regulated by P53 (33, 34, 35) .

Some wt1het mice also developed lymphoma, again supporting a role for WT1 as a tumor suppressor. Lymphoma development has been reported in a number of Wilms’ tumor patients (36 , 37) but it was hypothesized that these tumors develop as a result of the treatment against Wilms’ tumor. Although the number of informative cases is small, our data suggest that wt1 heterozygosity alone may already predispose to lymphoma development.

wt1het/p53-null Mice Develop Oncocytoma and Glomerular Sclerosis.

In the absence of p53, wt1-heterozygosity predisposes to the development of neoplastic lesions resembling oncocytoma, a form of epithelial neoplasm in humans. Because WT1 is not expressed in adult tubule cells, we hypothesize that the neoplastic tubule cells are the result of disrupted normal development, when WT1-expressing mesenchyme cells differentiate into nonexpressing tubule cells (1) . Oncocytoma is regarded as benign; and surgical resection, either by partial nephrectomy or by radical nephrectomy, is curative (24) . Oncocytoma accounts for ∼4% of renal tumors in adults, and most occur in patients over the age of 50 years with a male to female ratio of 2:1. They are often detected as incidental findings, although oncocytoma may present with hematuria or a palpable mass. Regarding the incidence of oncocytoma, we found no differences between male and female wt1het/p53-null mice, but several did develop hematuria as determined with urine test strips (Roche Combur 10; data not shown).

wt1het Mice Develop Glomerular Sclerosis.

To our surprise, we found that the wt1het mice died earlier than their wild-type littermates. Autopsy revealed that 80% of the wt1het mice suffered from severe glomerular sclerosis. The wt1het-mouse may serve as a good model to study the role of wt1 in the development of glomerular sclerosis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Joop Jansen for critically reading this manuscript, and Dr. Andrew Carothers and Dr. Peter Teague for performing the statistical analyses.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by Grant M/95/3/96 from the Wellcome Trust and Grant R37/2/98 from the National Kidney Research Fund. A. R. C. is supported by the Royal Society.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Central Hematology Laboratory, University Medical Center St. Radboud, P. O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: WT1, Wilms’ tumor 1; wt1het, Wilms’ tumor 1 heterozygote; p53het, p53 heterozygote; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR.

  • Received November 5, 2001.
  • Accepted September 20, 2002.
  • ©2002 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Menke A. L., Hastie N. D. Wilms’ tumour, a developmental anomaly Fisher D. E. eds. . Tumor Suppressor Genes in Human Cancer, 307-350, Humana Press Totowa, NJ 2001.
  2. ↵
    Menke A. L., van der Eb A. J., Jochemsen A. G. The Wilms’ tumor 1 gene: oncogene or tumor suppressor gene?. Int. Rev. Cytol., 181: 151-212, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Scharnhorst V., Dekker P., van der Eb A. J., Jochemsen A. G. Physical interaction between Wilms tumor 1 and p73 proteins modulates their functions. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 10202-10211, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Maheswaran S., Park S., Bernard A., Morris J. F., Rauscher F. J., Hill D. E., Haber D. A. Physical functional interaction between WT1 and p53 proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 5100-5104, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Bardeesy N., Falkof D., Petruzzi M-J., Nowak N., Zabel B., Adam M., Aguiar M. C., Grundy P., Shows T., Pelletier J. Anaplastic Wilms’ tumour, a subtype displaying poor prognosis, harbours p53 gene mutations. Nat. Gen., 7: 91-97, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Maheswaran S., Englert C., Bennett P., Heinrich G., Haber D. A. The WT1 gene product stabilizes p53 and inhibits p53 mediated apoptosis. Genes Dev., 9: 2143-2156, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Clarke A. R., Purdie C. A., Harrison D. J., Morris R. G., Bird C. C., Hooper M. L., Wyllie A. H. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathways. Nature (Lond.), 362: 849-852, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Kreidberg J. A., Sariola H., Loring J. M., Maeda M., Pelletier J., Housman D., Jaenisch R. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell, 74: 679-691, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Donehower L. A., Harvey M., Slagle B. L., McArthur M. J., Montgomery C. A., Jr., Butel J. S., Bradley A. Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature (Lond.), 356: 215-221, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Donehower L. A., Harvey M., Vogel H., McArthur M. J., Montgomery C. A., Jr., Park S. H., Thompson T., Ford R. J., Bradley A. Effects of genetic background on tumorigenesis in p53-deficient mice. Mol. Carcinog., 14: 16-22, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Purdie C. A., Harrison D. J., Peter A., Dobbie L., White S., Howie S. E., Salter D. M., Bird C. C., Wyllie A. H., Hooper M. L., Clarke A. R. Tumour incidence, spectrum and ploidy in mice with a large deletion in the p53 gene. Oncogene, 9: 603-609, 1994.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Oates J., Edwards C. HBME-1, MOC-31, WT1 and calretinin: an assessment of recently described markers for mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma. Histopathology, 36: 341-347, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Loeb D. M., Evron E., Patel C. B., Sharma P. M., Niranjan B., Buluwela L., Weitzman S. A., Korz D., Sukumar S. Wilms’ tumor suppressor gene (WT1) is expressed in primary breast tumors despite tumor-specific promoter methylation. Cancer Res., 61: 921-925, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Kudoh T., Ishidate T., Nakamura T., Toyoshima K., Akiyama T. Constitutive expression of the Wilms tumor suppressor gene WT1 in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells induces apoptotic cell death in response to retinoic acid. Oncogene, 13: 1431-1439, 1996.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Coppes M. J., Ye Y., Rackley R., Zhao X-I., Liefers G. J., Casey G., Williams B. R. G. Analysis of WT1 in granulosa cell and other sex cord-stromal tumors. Cancer Res., 53: 2712-2714, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Miwa H., Beran M., Saunders G. F. Expression of the Wilms’ tumor gene (WT1) in human leukemias. Leukemia (Baltimore), 6: 405-409, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Hartley A. L., Birch J. M., Tricker K., Wallace S. A., Kelsey A. M., Harris M., Jones P. H. M. Wilms-tumor in the Li-Fraumeni cancer family syndrome. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 67: 133-135, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Herzer U., Crocoll A., Barton D., Howells N., Englert C. The Wilms tumor suppressor gene wt1 is required for development of the spleen. Curr. Biol., 9: 837-840, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Kreidberg J. A., Natoli T. A., McGinnis L., Donovan M., Biggers J. D., Amstutz A. Coordinate action of Wt1 and a modifier gene supports embryonic survival in the oviduct. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 52: 366-375, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Bancroft D. J., Stevens A. . Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques, Ed. 3. Chapter 7, 112 Churchhill Livingstone New York 1990.
  21. ↵
    Fyfe L., Maingay J. P., Howie S. E. Murine HIV-1 p24 specific T lymphocyte activation by different antigen presenting cells: B lymphocytes from immunized mice present core protein to T cells. Immunol. Lett., 35: 45-50, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Armstrong J. F., Kaufman M. H., Harrison D. J., Clarke A. R. High-frequency developmental abnormalities in p53-deficient mice. Curr. Biol., 5: 931-936, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Sah V. P., Attardi L. D., Mulligan G. J., Williams B. O., Bronson R. T., Jacks T. A subset of p53-deficient embryos exhibit exencephaly. Nat. Genet., 10: 175-180, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Grignon D. J., Eble J. N. Renal neoplasms Ed. 5 Jennette J. C. Olson J. L. Schwartz M. M. Silva F. G. eds. . Heptinstall’s Pathology of the Kidney, 2: 1546-1551, Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia 1998.
  25. ↵
    Pritchard-Jones K., King-Underwood L. The Wilms tumour gene WT1 in leukaemia. Leuk. Lymphoma, 27: 207-220, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Park S., Schalling M., Bernard A., Maheswaran S., Shipley G. C., Roberts D., Fletcher J., Shipman R., Rheinwald J., Demetri G., Griffin J., Minden M., Housman D. E., Haber D. A. The Wilms tumour gene WT1 is expressed in murine mesoderm-derived tissues and mutated in a human mesothelioma. Nat. Genet., 4: 415-420, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Telerman A., Dodemont H., Degraef C., Galand P., Bauwens S., Van Oostveldt P., Amson R. B. Identification of the cellular protein encoded by the human Wilms’ tumor (WT1) gene. Oncogene, 7: 2545-2548, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    McCann S., Sullivan J., Guerra J., Arcinas M., Boxer L. M. Repression of the c-myb gene by WT1 protein in T and B cell lines. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 23785-23789, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Lowe S. W., Schmitt E. M., Smith S. W., Osborne B. A., Jacks T. p53 is required for radiation-induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes. Nature (Lond.), 362: 847-849, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Schmitt C. A., Rosenthal C. T., Lowe S. W. Genetic analysis of chemoresistance in primary murine lymphomas. Nat. Med., 6: 1029-1035, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Englert C., Hou X., Maheswaran S., Bennett P., Ngwu C., Re G. G., Garvin A. J., Rosner M. R., Haber D. A. WT1 suppresses synthesis of the epidermal growth factor receptor and induces apoptosis. EMBO J., 14: 4662-4675, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Menke A. L., Shvarts A., Riteco N., Van Ham R. C. A., Van der Eb A. J., Jochemsen A. G. Wilms’ tumor 1-KTS isoforms induce p53-independent apoptosis that can be partially rescued by expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor or the insulin receptor. Cancer Res., 57: 1353-1363, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Werner H., Shalita-Chesner M., Abramovitch S., Idelman G., Shaharabani-Gargir L., Glaser T. Regulation of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor gene by oncogenes and antioncogenes: implications in human cancer. Mol. Genet. Metab., 71: 315-320, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Zhang L., Zhan Q., Zhan S., Kashanchi F., Fornace A. J., Jr., Seth P., Helman L. J. p53 regulates human insulin-like growth factor II gene expression through active P4 promoter in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. DNA Cell Biol., 17: 125-131, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Wu Y. I., Mehe J. W., Heckman C. A., Arcinas M., Boxer L. M. Negative regulation of bcl-2 expression by p53 in hematopoietic cells. Oncogene, 20: 240-251, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Hartley A. L., Birch J. M., Harris M., Blair V., Morris Jones P. H., Gattamaneni H. R., Kelsey A. M. Leukemia, lymphoma, and related disorders in families of children diagnosed with Wilms’ tumor. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 77: 129-133, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Byrd R. L., Levine A. S. Late effects of treatment of Wilms’ tumor Pochedly C. Baum E. S. eds. . Wilms’ Tumor: Clinical and Biological Manifestations, 215-250, Elsevier Science Publishing New York 1984.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 62 (22)
November 2002
Volume 62, Issue 22
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Interactions between the Wilms’ Tumor 1 Gene and the p53 Gene
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Genetic Interactions between the Wilms’ Tumor 1 Gene and the p53 Gene
Aswin L. Menke, Alan R. Clarke, Andrea Leitch, Annemieke Ijpenberg, Kathy A. Williamson, Lee Spraggon, David J. Harrison and Nicholas D. Hastie
Cancer Res November 15 2002 (62) (22) 6615-6620;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Genetic Interactions between the Wilms’ Tumor 1 Gene and the p53 Gene
Aswin L. Menke, Alan R. Clarke, Andrea Leitch, Annemieke Ijpenberg, Kathy A. Williamson, Lee Spraggon, David J. Harrison and Nicholas D. Hastie
Cancer Res November 15 2002 (62) (22) 6615-6620;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Impact of Microsatellite Instability on the Molecular Phenotype of Colorectal Tumors
  • Transcription Factor c-Jun Activation Represses mdr-1 Gene Expression
  • Inactivation of BHD in Sporadic Renal Tumors
Show more Molecular Biology and Genetics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement