Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology

Radiosensitization and DNA Repair Inhibition by the Combined Use of Novel Inhibitors of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1

Stephany J. Veuger, Nicola J. Curtin, Caroline J. Richardson, Graeme C. M. Smith and Barbara W. Durkacz
Stephany J. Veuger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola J. Curtin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline J. Richardson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme C. M. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara W. Durkacz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published September 2003
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The DNA repair enzymes, DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), are key determinants of radio- and chemo-resistance. We have developed and evaluated novel specific inhibitors of DNA-PK (NU7026) and PARP-1 (AG14361) for use in anticancer therapy. PARP-1- and DNA-PK-deficient cell lines were 4-fold more sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR) alone, and showed reduced potentially lethal damage recovery (PLDR) in G0 cells, compared with their proficient counterparts. NU7026 (10 μm) potentiated IR cytotoxicity [potentiation factor at 90% cell kill (PF90) = 1.51 ± 0.04] in exponentially growing DNA-PK proficient but not deficient cells. Similarly, AG14361 (0.4 μm) potentiated IR in PARP-1+/+ (PF90 = 1.37 ± 0.03) but not PARP-1−/− cells. When NU7026 and AG14361 were used in combination, their potentiating effects were additive (e.g., PF90 = 2.81 ± 0.19 in PARP-1+/+ cells). Both inhibitors alone reduced PLDR ∼3-fold in the proficient cell lines. Furthermore, the inhibitor combination completely abolished PLDR. IR-induced DNA double strand break (DNA DSB) repair was inhibited by both NU7026 and AG14361, and use of the inhibitor combination prevented 90% of DNA DSB rejoining, even 24-h postirradiation. Thus, there was a correlation between the ability of the inhibitors to prevent IR-induced DNA DSB repair and their ability to potentiate cytotoxicity. Thus, individually, or in combination, the DNA-PK and PARP-1 inhibitors act as potent radiosensitizers and show potential as tools for anticancer therapeutic intervention.

INTRODUCTION

Enzyme-mediated repair of DNA DSBs 3 is a major mechanism of resistance to radiotherapy, and inhibition of DNA DSB repair is thus a strategy for radiopotentiation. This study focuses on the use of novel inhibitors of the DNA-PK and PARP-1, both of which are DNA strand break-activated enzymes and key components of DNA damage recognition, repair, and signaling pathways.

Two DNA DSB repair pathways in eukaryotes are NHEJ and HRR (1) . Important components in these repair pathways are the PI 3-K-related protein kinase family of enzymes. These DNA damage-activated serine/threonine protein kinases include DNA-PK, ATM, and ATR (2) . The DNA-PK holoenzyme comprises a heterodimer of Mr ∼70,000 and ∼80,000 polypeptides, known as Ku, which binds to DNA strand breaks, recruiting and activating the Mr 470,000 catalytic subunit, termed DNA-PKcs (3) . Numerous studies have shown that cells lacking either functional DNA-PKcs or Ku80 through mutation or gene knockout are hypersensitive to IR and cross-linking agents (3, 4, 5, 6) . DNA-PK, together with the XRCC4/DNA ligase IV complex and the recently identified cofactor Artemis, is specifically required for NHEJ (7 , 8) , with ∼80% of DNA DSBs repaired by this pathway (9) .

The first identified inhibitor of the PI 3-K-related protein kinase enzyme family was the fungal metabolite Wortmannin. Although primarily used as a PI 3-K inhibitor, it was also shown to potentiate IR-induced cytotoxicity and inhibit DNA DSB repair at concentrations that inhibit cellular DNA-PK (10, 11, 12, 13) . The recently synthesized molecule NU7026, 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-benzo[h]chomen-4-one, a novel and specific inhibitor of DNA-PK, has been evaluated in this study.

PARP-1 is a Mr 116,000 enzyme that is an important component of the BER complex required for DNA SSB repair (14, 15, 16) . Loss of PARP-1 function, using molecular genetic techniques or inhibition, causes radiosensitization and potentiates the cytotoxicity of monofunctional alkylating agents (17, 18, 19) . Thus, PARP-1 inhibitors are predicted to improve the efficacy of radio and certain types of chemo-therapy. It is generally assumed that the inhibition of BER is the cause of the enhanced cytotoxicity. However, we have recently reported that a PARP-1 inhibitor (NU1025) also inhibits DNA DSB repair in cells exposed to IR, and this may contribute to the cytotoxic mechanism (12) .

Convincing evidence for in vivo radiopotentiation with a PARP-1 inhibitor was obtained using PD128763 (20) . Using a murine tumor model, Leopold and Seebolt-Leopold demonstrated that PD128763+ IR caused a 10–15-day increase in growth delay compared with irradiation alone. The clinical potential of this class of agents has led to the development of diverse classes of potent PARP-1 inhibitors (21, 22, 23) . The tricyclic benzamidizole 1-(4-dimethylaminomethyl-phenyl)-8,9-dihydro-7H-2,7,9a-benzo[cd]azulen-6-one) AG14361 has been used in this study (23) .

Radiosensitization by deficiency or inhibition of either DNA-PK or PARP-1 is not limited to proliferating cells. Nonproliferating cells exposed to IR are known to undergo PLDR leading to substantial increases in survival compared with proliferating cells or cells induced to start a proliferative cycle shortly after irradiation (24 , 25) . Several early reports, using either cell lines mutationally inactivated in DNA-PK or PARP-1 inhibitors, showed a reduction in PLDR in nonproliferating (quiescent) cells (26, 27, 28, 29, 30) . Local tumor conditions, such as cell and vascular density, as well as availability of oxygen and nutrients, frequently result in a high fraction of nonproliferating cells. PLDR after irradiation is considered to be an important determinant of radioresistance and has been demonstrated in tumor cell lines and in an experimental tumor model (31, 32, 33) . Thus, the potential of small molecule inhibitors of DNA-PK and PARP-1 to prevent PLDR is an important consideration in the assessment of their therapeutic application.

Here, we describe the biological effects of both AG14361 and NU7026 in cell culture models. We have investigated the ability of these inhibitors, used alone or in combination, to radiosensitize both proliferating and quiescent paired cell lines proficient or deficient in either DNA-PK or PARP-1. In addition, their effects on DNA DSB repair were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drugs.

NU7026 was synthesized in the Department of Chemistry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne. AG14361 was synthesized by Pfizer GRD, CA (23) . NU7026 and AG14361 were dissolved in anhydrous DMSO at stock concentrations of 5 and 10 mm, respectively, and stored at −20°C. Drugs (alone or in combination) were added to cell cultures so that the final DMSO concentrations were kept constant at 1% (v/v).

Cell Lines and Culture.

Primary PARP-1+/+ and PARP-1−/− MEFs were a gift from Professor Gilbert de Murcia, École Supérieure de Biotechnologie de Strasbourg, France. Spontaneously immortalized cell lines were derived from the primary MEFs to enable clonogenic survival assays to be performed. It was noted that the immortalized PARP-1+/+ MEFs expressed very high basal levels of p53 protein compared with the PARP-1−/− MEFs, and therefore, the p53 gene was sequenced. It was found that the PARP-1−/− cells had a wt p53 sequence, but the PARP-1+/+ had an Asp to Glu substitution at codon 278 in p53, within a conserved region of the DNA binding domain. This rendered the p53 unable to act as a transcriptional transactivator. 4 The significance of the difference in the functional status of p53, with respect to the results obtained, is explored in the “Discussion.” The Chinese hamster cell lines V3 (mutated in DNA-PKcs) and V3YAC [V3 transfected with a YAC carrying the complementing human DNA-PKcs gene] were kindly provided by Dr. Penny Jeggo, University of Sussex (34) .

All cell lines were cultured as monolayers in DMEM medium [supplemented with 10% (v/v) FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin]. Glutamine was added at a final concentration of 2 mm. The V3YAC cell line was maintained under antibiotic selection with genticin (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, United Kingdom) at a final concentration of 500 μg/ml to ensure retention of the YAC.

Purified Enzyme Assays.

Mammalian DNA-PK (500 ng/μl) was isolated from HeLa cell nuclear extract after chromatography using Q-Sepharose, S-Sepharose, and Heparin agarose. DNA-PK (250 ng) activity was measured at 30°C, in a final volume of 40 μl, in buffer containing 25 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), 12.5 mm MgCl2, 50 mm KCl, 1 mm DTT, 10% v/v Glycerol, 0.1% w/v NP-40, and 1 mg of the substrate GST-p53N66 (the NH2-terminal 66 amino acid residues of human wild-type p53 fused to glutathione S-transferase) in polypropylene 96-well plates. To the assay mix, varying concentrations of inhibitor (in DMSO at a final concentration of 1% v/v) were added. After 10 min of incubation, ATP was added to give a final concentration of 50 μm, along with a 30-mer double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide (final concentration of 0.5 ng/ml), to initiate the reaction. After 1 h with shaking, 150 μl of PBS were added to the reaction, and 5 μl were then transferred to a 96-well opaque white plate containing 45 μl of PBS per well, where the GSTp53N66 substrate was allowed to bind to the wells for 1 h. To detect the phosphorylation event on the serine 15 residue of p53 elicited by DNA-PK, a p53 phosphoserine-15 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) was used in a basic ELISA procedure. An antirabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Pierce) was then used in the ELISA before the addition of chemiluminescence reagent (Renaissance, New England Nuclear) to detect the signal as measured by chemiluminescent counting via a TopCount NXT (Packard).

The protocols used to detect ATM kinase and ATR kinase activities were performed essentially according to the methodologies described previously (35 , 36) . ATM and ATR were immunoprecipitated using rabbit polyclonal antisera raised to the COOH-terminal 400 amino acids of ATM and antisera raised to amino acids 400–480 of ATR, respectively. The PI 3-kinase assay was performed essentially as described previously (37) , using baculoviral derived recombinant p110α and p85α (a kind gift from Prof. Mike Waterfield, Ludwig Institute, London, United Kingdom).

The IC50s for the compounds in all of the enzymes assays were derived from sigmoidal plots using the graphic package Prism, in which the enzyme activity in the varying concentration of compounds was plotted against the concentration of compound.

Cytotoxicity Assays.

Clonogenic assays were performed as described previously (12) . Briefly, exponentially growing cells (± AG14361 and/or NU7026) were exposed to IR. Drug(s) were added 60 min before irradiation followed by a 16-h postincubation at 37°C before harvesting and reseeding for colony formation in the absence of drugs. Data were normalized to untreated controls (1% v/v DMSO). PF90 values were calculated from the ratio of the individual LD90 values, i.e., the LD90 divided by LD90 in the presence of inhibitor(s).

PLDR.

The effects of AG14361 and NU7026, alone or in combination, were investigated in growth arrested cells after approximately equitoxic doses of IR. Cells were grown to confluence to induce G1 arrest (G0 status) before irradiation and irradiated in conditioned medium obtained from plateau phase cells. Cell cycle distribution to confirm G1 arrest in plateau phase cells was assessed by flow cytometric analysis (data not shown). Drug(s) were added in conditioned medium 60 min before irradiation. After exposure to IR, cells were trypsinized and reseeded for colony formation in the absence of drugs, either immediately after exposure to IR or after a 24-h postincubation (± AG14361 and/or NU7026) at 37°C.

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression.

Cell lysates were prepared from exponentially growing cells and loaded onto denaturing polyacrylamide gels using standard protocols. DNA-PKcs was resolved on 3–8% (w/v) Tris acetate gradient gels and all other proteins on 4–20% (w/v) Tris glycine gradient gels (Invitrogen Ltd., Paisley, United Kingdom). After electrophoresis, proteins were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad, Herts, United Kingdom) and probed for PARP-1 (H-250 rabbit polyclonal; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and DNA-PKcs (Ab-4 cocktail mouse monoclonal; Stratech Scientific, Cambs, United Kingdom). As a loading control, an antiactin antibody (mouse clone AC-40; Sigma, Dorset, United Kingdom) was used. This was followed by binding of peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse/rabbit antibody and detection of proteins by enhanced chemiluminescence (DAKO, Ely, United Kingdom).

Cell-based Enzyme Activity Assays.

For comparison of enzyme activities in the cell lines, the following techniques were used: DNA-PK was assayed in nuclear extracts. Briefly, DNA was removed from the extracts using high salt elution (fast flow DEAE Sepharose; Amersham Pharmacia, Bucks, United Kingdom). Fifty microgram aliquots were assayed for DNA-PK activity using the SIGNATECT DNA-PK assay system (Promega, Hants, United Kingdom). PARP-1 was assayed by measuring incorporation of radiolabel from [32P] NAD+ into acid precipitable counts in a permeabilized cell system (38) . Cells were permeabilized using digitonin, and a 30-bp blunt-ended oligonucleotide was used in the assay to maximally activate PARP-1.

DNA Strand-Break Assays.

DNA DSB levels were measured by neutral filter elution (39) . The radiolabelling, drug treatment, postincubation conditions, and sample preparation used in these experiments were exactly as described by Boulton et al. (11) . In all experiments, cells were exposed to 75 Gy IR. Cell cultures were preincubated ± AG14361 and/or NU7026 for 60 min before exposure to IR, and the drugs remained in the culture medium during the postincubation periods. Regression analysis of each elution profile was performed to calculate the relative retention, i.e., the fraction of sample DNA retained on the filter when 50% of the internal standard has eluted (40) . Values for cells treated with IR ± inhibitor(s) were expressed as a percentage of the values of unirradiated controls.

RESULTS

Inhibitor Structures and Evaluation of Enzyme Inhibition.

The structure of AG14361 (1-(4-dimethylaminomethyl-phenyl)-8,9-dihydro-7H-2,7,9a-benzo[cd]azulen-6-one) and NU7026 (2-(morpholin-4-yl)-benzo[h]chomen-4-one) is shown in Fig. 1 ⇓ . AG14361 is an extremely potent competitive inhibitor of PARP-1 with a Ki value < 5 nm (16) . In the permeabilized cell assay used here, the IC50 for AG14361 in the V3YAC cells was 68.4 ± 3.5 nm and 56.3 ± 4.2 nm in the PARP-1+/+ cells.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chemical structures of AG14361 [1-(4-dimethylaminomethyl-phenyl)-8,9- dihydro-7H-2,7,9a-benzo[cd]azulen-6-one] and NU7026 [2-(morpholin-4-yl)-benzo[h]chomen-4-one].

Wortmannin is a noncompetitive, irreversible inhibitor of DNA-PK (10) , whereas NU7026 is competitive with ATP. Shown in Table 1 ⇓ is a comparison of the relative inhibitory potencies of NU7026 and Wortmannin against PI 3-K, DNA-PK, ATM, and ATR. Although Wortmannin is primarily a PI 3-K inhibitor, being 90-fold more active against PI 3-K than DNA-PK or ATM, NU7026 was more selective for DNA-PK with a 60-fold greater potency against this enzyme than PI 3-K and inactive against both ATM and ATR. Thus, in contrast to Wortmannin, NU7026 demonstrates excellent specificity for DNA-PK.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Comparison of inhibitor potencies and specificities against the PIKK family enzymesa

AG14361 (0.4 μm) completely inhibited purified PARP-1 enzyme activity while having no effect on DNA-PK activity, and similarly, NU7026 (10 μm) completely inhibited purified DNA-PK activity, while having no effect on PARP-1 activity (results not shown). These inhibitor concentrations were used in all subsequent cell culture experiments.

Characterization of Cell Lines.

Western blot analyses were carried out to assess PARP-1 and DNA-PK protein levels in the paired cell lines. As expected (Fig. 2A) ⇓ , the PARP-1+/+ cell line exhibited a band at Mr 116,000 (PARP-1), and this was completely absent in the PARP-1−/− cell line. However, both these cell lines showed bands for DNA-PKcs and Ku80 (results not shown). The V3 cell line lacked the Mr 470,000 DNA-PKcs band, but this was restored in the V3YAC cell line (Fig. 2A) ⇓ . Both these cell lines showed the Mr 116,000 PARP-1 band (results not shown). DNA-PK and PARP-1 assays were carried out to confirm that the lack of detectable protein in the V3 and PARP-1−/− cells correlated with an absence of the corresponding enzyme activities, to ensure that DNA-PK activity was present in both the PARP-1+/+ and PARP-1−/− cell lines and to ensure that PARP-1 activity was present in both the V3 and V3YAC cell lines (Fig. 2, B and C) ⇓ . DNA-PK activity was slightly higher in the V3YAC cell line (750 pmol ATP/mg protein) compared with the PARP-1+/+ and PARP-1−/− cell lines (500 pmol ATP/mg protein for both cell lines; Fig. 2B ⇓ ). This may reflect overexpression of the human DNA-PKcs by the YAC. As expected, DNA-PK activity was undetectable in the V3 cells. PARP-1 activity was similar in all of the cell lines, apart from the PARP-1−/− cells, which retained 3.9 ± 0.5% residual activity compared with the PARP-1+/+ cells (Fig. 2C) ⇓ . This residual activity is likely to be attributable to PARP-2, which, together with PARP-1, has also been implicated in BER (16) .

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Characterization of DNA-PK and PARP-1 levels and activities in the cell lines studied. A, Western blot analysis of PARP-1 and DNA-PK. Blots were probed using antibodies against PARP-1 and DNA-PKcs; B, DNA-PK activity; C, PARP-1 activity. Results are the mean of three replicate samples each from three independent experiments ± SE.

Radiosensitization by AG14361 and NU7026.

The effects of AG14361 and NU7026 alone and on IR-induced cytotoxicity were investigated in exponentially growing cell lines. Both PARP-1- and DNA-PK-deficient cells were ∼4-fold more sensitive to IR than their proficient counterparts (note the different IR dose ranges in Fig. 3, A versus B ⇓ and Fig. 3, C versus D ⇓ ).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effects of increasing doses of IR in the presence or absence of AG14361 and NU7026 on the survival of exponentially growing: A, V3YAC cells; B, V3 cells; C, PARP-1+/+ cells; D, PARP-1−/− cells; ▪, IR alone; ▴, IR + AG14361; ▾, IR+ NU7026; ♦, IR + AG14361 + NU7026. Cells were preincubated with drug(s) for 1 h before exposure to IR, then incubated for 16-h post-treatment before reseeding for colony formation. Data are the mean of at least three independent experiments ± SE.

Neither AG14361 (≤40 μm) nor NU7026 (≤50 μm), alone or in combination, reduced clonogenic survival (results not shown). The inhibitors were effective when added immediately before exposure to IR but for convenience were routinely added 1 h before irradiation. Both AG14361 and NU7026 potentiated IR in a concentration-dependent manner, and maximum potentiation was achieved at 10 μm NU7026 and 0.4 μm AG14361 (results not shown). Therefore, these concentrations were used in all subsequent experiments.

The inhibitors used alone, or in combination, potentiated the cytotoxicity of IR in the enzyme proficient exponentially growing V3YAC and PARP-1+/+ cells (Fig. 3, A and C) ⇓ . PF90 values were calculated to quantitate the potentiating effects of the inhibitors alone, and in combination, on IR-induced cytotoxicity, and the results are summarized in Table 2 ⇓ . Approximately additive effects were obtained when the inhibitors were used together (Fig. 3, A and C) ⇓ , e.g., the PF90 values for AG14361 and NU7026 in the V3YAC cell line were 1.4 ± 0 and 1.51 ± 0.04, respectively; when used in combination, the PF90 value was 2.78 ± 0.04 (Table 2) ⇓ . Significant radiosensitization by AG14361 was observed in all of the cell lines with PARP-1 activity (Fig. 3, A–C ⇓ ; PF90 values 1.3–1.4) but not in the PARP-1−/− cells (Fig. 3D) ⇓ . Similarly, NU7026 caused significant radiosensitization in the DNA-PK proficient cells (Fig. 3, A, C, and D ⇓ ; PF90 values 1.1–1.7) but not in the DNA-PK-deficient cell (Fig. 3B) ⇓ . These data support the hypothesis that NU7026 and AG14361 mediate potentiation specifically by inhibition of their target enzymes, DNA-PK and PARP-1, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Comparison of the PF90 valuesa derived from IR survival curves

Prevention of PLDR by AG14361 and NU7026.

The effects of the inhibitors on PLDR were investigated. Cells were growth arrested by growing them to confluence. G0 status was confirmed by flow cytometric analysis (results not shown). Cells were exposed to approximately equitoxic doses of IR (see details in Fig. 4 ⇓ legend), such that the survival of cells which were immediately replated was ≤5%. After a 24-h delay in replating, which allows quiescent (G0) cells to repair PLD, the surviving fraction of V3YAC and PARP-1+/+ cells was increased 7–8-fold (Fig. 4, A and C) ⇓ . This recovery was reduced by ∼70% by inclusion of AG14361 during the recovery period, whereas NU7026 alone completely abolished PLDR, and the combination of NU7026 and AG14361 reduced survival even further (Fig. 4, A and C) ⇓ . PLDR was reduced (2–3-fold) in both DNA-PK-deficient (V3) and PARP-deficient (PARP-1−/−) cells, compared with their proficient counterparts, and this modest recovery was fully inhibited by AG14361 or NU7026, respectively (Fig. 4, B and D) ⇓ . As expected, no inhibition of PLDR was obtained by the use of NU7026 in the V3 cell line (Fig. 4B) ⇓ . However, when AG14361 was used in the PARP-1−/− cell line (Fig. 4D) ⇓ , there was a small, but significant, inhibition of PLDR. A possible explanation is that AG14361 may additionally inhibit PARP-2, which has also been implicated in BER (16) .

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Effects of AG14361 and NU7026 on recovery from IR-induced potentially lethal damage in growth-arrested cells. Cells were treated with approximately equitoxic doses of IR; 6 Gy for V3YAC, 1.4 Gy for V3, 5 Gy for PARP-1+/+, and 1.2 Gy for PARP-1−/−. The cells were either replated immediately for colony formation (white bars) or after a 24-h postincubation to allow PLDR (black bars). A, V3YAC; B, V3; C, PARP-1+/+; D, PARP-1−/−.

Inhibition of DNA DSB Repair by AG14361 and NU7026.

The kinetics of DNA DSB repair after exposure to IR over a 60-min time period were investigated. In the DNA-PK-proficient (V3YAC) cells, DNA DSBs were rejoined rapidly with ≥80% rejoined by 60 min (Fig. 5A) ⇓ . Very similar results were obtained with the PARP-1+/+ cells (Fig. 5B) ⇓ . By contrast, in the V3 and PARP-1−/− cell lines, higher DNA DSB levels remained 60-min post-IR incubation with only ∼50% DNA DSB rejoined (5, A and B).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Kinetics of DNA DSB repair after a fixed dose of IR. A, ▪ V3YAC cells; □ V3 cells; B, • PARP-1+/+ cells; ○ PARP-1−/− cells. Cells were exposed to 75 GY IR and postincubated for increasing amounts of time before being harvested for neutral elution.

To determine whether the inhibitors similarly modulated DNA DSB repair, DNA DSB levels were assessed in cells ± AG14361 and/or NU7026 at 60-min post-IR. (Fig. 6, A–D) ⇓ . In the V3YAC and PARP-1+/+ cell lines, AG14361 and NU7026 inhibited DNA DSB repair, e.g., in the V3YAC cell line, AG14361 and NU7026 inhibited repair by 40 and 56%, respectively, compared with the drug-free control. When the inhibitors were used in combination in the enzyme-proficient cell lines, repair was reduced by ≥90% (Fig. 6, A and C) ⇓ . In comparison, NU7026 or AG14361 in the PARP-1−/− or V3 cells, respectively, only reduced repair by 70%, suggesting that inhibition of both enzymes has a more profound effect on repair than inhibition of one enzyme combined with lack of the other enzyme. Finally, as expected, NU7026 and AG14361 exerted no additional inhibitory effect on the reduced DNA DSB rejoining observed in the V3 or PARP-1 cell lines, respectively (Fig. 6, B and D) ⇓ .

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Effects of AG14361 and NU7026 on DNA DSB repair. A, V3YAC cells; B, V3 cells; C, PARP-1+/+ cells; D, PARP-1−/− cells. Cells were preincubated with inhibitor(s) for 60 min, exposed to 75 GY IR, and postincubated for 60 min before harvesting for neutral elution (A–D) or exposed to 75 GY and postincubated for 24 h. E, V3YAC cells; F, V3 cells.

Finally, the longer term effects of the inhibitors on DNA DSB repair were investigated by assessing DNA DSB levels in V3YAC and V3 cells 24-h postirradiation (Fig. 6, E and F) ⇓ . By this time, 96 ± 3% of DNA DSBs were rejoined in the control V3YAC cells, compared with 7 ± 2% and 60 ± 7% when treated with AG14361 and NU7026, respectively (Fig. 6E) ⇓ . When AG14361 and NU7026 were used in combination, only 10 ± 2% of the breaks had rejoined. The V3 cell line was only slightly less proficient than the V3YACs at rejoining DNA DSBs by 24 h (77 ± 3%), and this was further reduced by the inclusion of AG14361, whereas NU7026 exerted no additional effect.

DISCUSSION

Here, we describe the effects on cellular responses to IR produced by novel specific inhibitors of the repair enzymes PARP-1 and DNA-PK. We demonstrate that these compounds radiosensitize both proliferating and quiescent cells to IR and inhibit DNA DSB repair. Furthermore, when AG14361 and NU7026 are used in combination, their effects on all these biological endpoints are at least additive. In the survival experiments, cells were incubated for 16 h (approximately one cell cycle) after IR in the presence of the inhibitors before replating for colony formation. Additional experiments are required to determine the minimum exposure time to inhibitors necessary to obtain maximum potentiation. Use of the inhibitors in the paired cell lines, proficient or deficient for DNA-PK and PARP-1, has provided confirmation that the inhibitors mediate their effects on IR-induced cytotoxicity and DNA DSB repair specifically via inhibition of their target enzymes. Additionally, the radiosensitization and reduced DNA DSB repair observed in the deficient cell lines were mimicked by the use of the inhibitors in the proficient cell lines. The effect of enzyme inhibition or deficiency on cell survival closely paralleled the effects on DNA DSB repair, and hence, DNA DSB repair inhibition is a plausible mechanism for the radiosensitization observed.

Ideally, paired cell lines should be isogenic, differing only in the gene of interest. However, this is rarely the case, and it was established during the course of this work that, in contrast to the PARP-1−/− MEFs, which had retained wild-type p53 after spontaneous immortalization, the PARP-1+/+ MEFs had acquired a p53 mutation in the DNA binding domain and did not induce mdm2 in response to IR. 4 In consideration of the potential clinical use of DNA-PK and PARP-1 inhibitors, it is pertinent to point out that both inhibitors were able to cause radiosensitization in this cell line, despite the lack of a functional p53. This ability to radiopotentiate cells, regardless of their p53 status, increases the range of tumors for which the use of the inhibitors may be effective.

The observation that both NU7026 and AG14361 not only radiosensitize proliferating cells but also prevent PLDR in quiescent cells is very important. PLDR is a significant factor in determining tumor responses to radiotherapy (reviewed in Ref. 41 ). Evidence for PLDR in the nonproliferating compartment of tumors is very sparse, but experimental and clinical observations suggest that the rapid repopulation after IR-induced killing of the proliferating compartment of tumors results from recruitment of surviving G0 cells into the proliferative cycle.

Both inhibitors used alone substantially prevented PLDR. More dramatically, when used in combination, AG14361 and NU7026 not only completely abolished PLDR but reduced survival significantly below that obtained in cells exposed to IR alone and replated immediately (i.e., no 24-h recovery period), e.g., when quiescent V3YAC cells were irradiated, survival was reduced to 0.38% if the cells were replated immediately. Survival was increased to 3.3% by a 24-h delay in replating, but the presence of AG14361 and NU7026 during the 24-h delay reduced survival to 0.064%, even lower than the cells which were replated immediately post-IR. This extremely potent radiosensitization (∼50-fold) of nonproliferating cells by the combined use of the NU7026 and AG14361 is one of the major aims of radiobiologists and radiotherapists alike. Current interest in clinical rediosensitization has focused on hypoxic radiosensitizers and chemical radiosensitizers, such as the halogenated pyrimidine analogues (42, 43, 44) , whereas the potential of PLDR inhibitors has largely been ignored. These data point to inhibition of PLDR as a tool for clinical radiosensitization that merits further investigation.

PARP-1 inhibition clearly results in higher levels of IR-induced DNA DSBs, but these data do not prove a direct role for PARP-1 in NHEJ. IR-induced clustered damage involves, e.g., near neighbor base oxidation and hydrolysis of the phosphodiester backbone on opposite DNA strands (45) . BER at these sites will generate DNA SSB intermediates. Absence or inhibition of PARP-1 by preventing BER-mediated strand rejoining by ligase IV (46 , 47) may result in the longer lived DNA SSBs converting to DNA DSBs, rather than by directly inhibiting NHEJ.

A number of lines of evidence indicate that although DNA-PKcs highly stimulates the NHEJ pathway, in its absence, a slower repair pathway still operates (9 , 48) . The slower component of repair is probably mediated by DNA-PKcs-independent NHEJ but may also involve HRR, which requires a complex of DNA repair proteins, including RAD51, BRCA1, BRCA2, XRCC2, and ATM (1) . Both the slow component of NHEJ and HRR are considered to act independently of DNA-PKcs and PARP-1. It was therefore a striking observation that even 24-h postirradiation, the use of the inhibitors resulted in a reduction in the percentage of DNA DSBs rejoined. In particular, a profound effect on DNA DSB repair was observed in the V3YAC cells with the combined use of the inhibitors at 24 h, where only ∼10% of DNA DSBs had rejoined, compared with >95% of the control (Fig. 6A) ⇓ . DNA DSBs are considered to be the most cytotoxic lesion that cells encounter, and this almost complete and long-term abrogation of DNA DSB repair by the combined use of the inhibitors would easily explain their potent radiosensitizing effects in both proliferating and growth arrested cells. These data also indicate that the combined inhibition of PARP-1 and DNA-PK has downstream effects on the slow component of DNA DSB repair. One possible mechanism, which is suggested by the data, is that the inhibited enzymes have more deleterious consequences for DNA DSB repair (and hence survival) than the lack of enzymes. DNA-PK and PARP-1 bind avidly to DNA DSBs, and automodification by phosphorylation and poly(ADP-ribosylation), respectively, is essential for dissociation of these enzymes from the DNA (49 , 50) . Furthermore, Wortmannin has been demonstrated to block DNA-PK at DNA ends and prevents their processing by either DNA polymerization, degradation, or ligation (51) . Similarly, NU7026 and AG14361, by inhibiting the automodification reactions of their target enzymes, are predicted to tether the enzymes irreversibly to the DNA ends. These protein-bound DNA termini could hinder assembly of the enzyme complexes required for the successful execution of NHEJ and HRR.

A number of publications demonstrate interaction and/or cooperation between DNA-PK and PARP-1. Both enzymes have been shown to have high affinities for binding to DNA DSBs (52) . Modulation of enzyme activity by poly(ADP-ribosylation) of DNA-PK by PARP-1 and phosphorylation of PARP-1 by DNA-PK has also been demonstrated, suggesting reciprocal regulation of enzyme activity (53 , 54) . Finally, an intimate association between PARP-1 and Ku has been demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation studies (55) . These observations point to an, as yet, poorly understood functional association of the two enzymes in response to DNA damage.

Increased DNA-PK activity has been widely demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo and correlates with the resistance of tumor cells to IR and bifunctional alkylating agents (56, 57, 58, 59) . Conversely, acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic agents has been shown to correlate with increased DNA-PK activity (60, 61, 62) . Therefore, increased DNA-PK activity has been proposed as a novel cellular and tumor resistance mechanism. Such tumor-specific alterations are likely to be important in terms of therapeutic exploitation. Where DNA-PK is overexpressed, the use of a selective inhibitor is predicted to allow treatment of these tumors which would otherwise be radio and chemoresistant. The effects of NU7026 in model systems with increased DNA-PK activity merits further investigation. Whether there will be a therapeutic gain associated with the use of DNA-PK and PARP-1 inhibitors remains to be established, and an in vivo evaluation using human tumor xenografts in nude mice is planned.

In four recent reports, antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs, and a COOH-terminal peptide which targets Ku80 and prevents DNA-PKcs binding to Ku have been used to selectively deplete or inhibit DNA-PK function in human cell lines (63, 64, 65, 66) . Loss of DNA-PK activity correlated with radiosensitization, increased mutation, and inhibition of DNA damage repair. Our results, the first to use a selective small molecule inhibitor of DNA-PK, are consistent with these data which highlight the current high interest in this enzyme as a target for radio and chemotherapeutic modulation. A PARP-1 inhibitor is currently entering Phase I clinical trials under the auspices of Cancer Research United Kingdom, and the evidence presented here indicates that the combination of this inhibitor with a DNA-PK inhibitor could prove a powerful chemotherapeutic strategy.

In conclusion, the data presented here suggest that pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK and PARP-1, both alone and in conjunction, represents a promising strategy for tumor radiosensitization.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported by Cancer Research UK and Pfizer GRD (San Diego, CA).

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Northern Institute for Cancer Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 191 222 7133; Fax: 44 (0) 191 222 7556; E-mail: b.w.durkacz{at}newcastle.ac.uk

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: DSB, double strand break; ATM, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase; DNA-PKcs, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit; LD90, dose of ionizing radiation that causes 90% cell kill; ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase; BER, base excision repair; DNA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; HRR, homologous recombination repair; IR, ionizing radiation; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; PARP-1, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1; PF90, potentiation factor at 90% cell kill; PI 3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PLDR, potentially lethal damage recovery; SSB, single-strand break; YAC, yeast artificial chomosome.

  • ↵4 P. A. Jowsey, unpublished results.

  • Received April 7, 2003.
  • Revision received June 11, 2003.
  • Accepted July 9, 2003.
  • ©2003 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Jackson S. P. Sensing and repairing DNA double strand breaks. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 23: 687-696, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Durocher D., Jackson S. P. DNA-PK, ATM and ATR as sensors of DNA damage: variations on a theme?. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 13: 225-231, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Smith G. C., Jackson S. P. The DNA-dependent protein kinase. Genes Dev., 13: 916-934, 1999.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Caldecott J., Jeggo P. Cross sensitivity of gamma ray-sensitive hamster mutants to cross-linking agents. Mutat. Res., 255: 111-121, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Tanaka T., Yamagami T., Oka Y., Nomura T., Sugiyama H. The scid mutation in mice causes defects in the repair system for both double-strand DNA breaks and DNA cross-links. Mutat. Res., 288: 277-280, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Gu Y., Jin S., Gao Y., Weaver D. T., Frederick W. Ku70-deficient embryonic stem cells have increased ionizing radiosensitivity, defective DNA end-binding activity, and inability to support V(D)J recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 8076-8081, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Critchlow S. E., Jackson S. P. DNA end joining: from yeast to man. Trends. Biochem. Sci., 23: 394-398, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Pannicke M. Y., Schwarz K., Lieber M. R. Hairpin opening and overhang processing by an Artemis/DNA-dependent protein kinase complex in nonhomologous end joining and V(D)J recombination. Cell, 108: 781-794, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    DiBiase S. J., Zeng Z. C., Chen R., Hyslop T., Curran W. J., Jr., Iliakis G. DNA-dependent protein kinase stimulates an independently active, nonhomologous, end-joining apparatus. Cancer Res., 60: 1245-1253, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Izzard R. A., Jackson S. P., Smith G. C. M. Competitive and noncompetitive inhibition of the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Cancer Res., 59: 2581-2586, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Boulton S., Kyle S., Yalχintepe L., Durkacz B. W. Wortmannin is a potent inhibitor of DNA double strand break repair but not single strand break repair in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 2285-2290, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Boulton S., Kyle S., Durkacz B. W. Interactive effects of inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and DNA dependent protein kinase on cellular responses to DNA damage. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 199-203, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Rosenzweig K. E., Youmell M. B., Palayoor S. T., Price B. R. Radiosensitization of human tumor cells by the phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002 correlates with inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase and prolonged G2-M delay. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 1149-1156, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    Smith S. The world according to PARP. TIBS, 26: 174-179, 2001.
  15. ↵
    Masson M., Niedergang C., Scheiber V., Muller S., Menissier-de Murcia J., de Murcia G. XRCC1 is specifically associated with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and negatively regulates its activity following DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 3563-3571, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Schreiber V., Amé J.-C., Dollé P., Schultz I., Rinaldi B., Fraulob V., Ménissier-de Murcia J., de Murcia G. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 (PARP-2) is required for efficient DNA repair in association with PARP-1 and XRCC1. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 23028-23036, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Molinete M., Vermeulen W., Burkle A., Menissier-de Murcia J., Kupper J. H., Hoeijmakers J. H., de Murcia G. Overproduction of the poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase DNA-binding domain blocks alkylation-induced DNA repair synthesis in mammalian cells. EMBO J., 12: 2109-2117, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Ding R., Smulson M. Depletion of nuclear poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase by antisense RNA expression; influence on genomic stability, chromatin organization and carcinogen cytotoxicity. Cancer Res., 54: 4627-4634, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Curtin N. J., Golding B. T., Griffin R. J., Newell D. R., Roberts M. J., Srinivasan S., White A. W. New PARP inhibitors for chemo- and radio-therapy of cancer de Murcia G. Shall S. eds. . From DNA Damage and Stress Signalling to Cell Death: Poly ADP-Ribosylation Reactions, 177-206, Oxford University Press Oxford 2000.
  20. ↵
    Leopold W. R., Sebolt-Leopold J. S. Chemical approaches to improved radiotherapy Valeriote F. A. Corbett T. H. Baker L. H. eds. . Cytotoxic Anticancer Drugs: Models and Concepts for Drug Discovery and Development, 179-196, Boston Kluwer 1990.
  21. ↵
    Tentori L., Partarena I., Graziani G. Potential clinical applications of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Pharmacol. Res., 45: 73-85, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Griffin R. J., Curtin N. J., Newell D. R., Golding B. T., Durkacz B. W., Calvert A. H. The role of inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase as resistance modifying agents in cancer therapy. Biochimie, 77: 422-488, 1995.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Skalitzky D. J., Marakovits J. T., Maegley K. A., Ekker A., Yu X. H., Hostomsky Z., Webber S. E., Eastman B. W., Almassy R., Li J., Curtin N. J., Newell D. R., Calvert A. H., Griffin R. J., Golding B. T. Tricyclic benzimidazoles as potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem., 46: 210-213, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Phillips R. A., Tolmach L. J. Repair of potentially lethal radiation damage in X irradiated HeLa cells. Radiat. Res., 29: 413-432, 1966.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Little J. B. Repair of sublethal and potentially lethal radiation damage in plateau phase cultures of human cells. Nature (Lond.), 224: 804-806, 1969.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Illiakis G. E., Okasayu R. Radiosensitivity throughout the cell cycle and repair of potentially lethal damage and DNA double-strand breaks in an X-ray-sensitive CHO mutant. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 57: 1195-1211, 1990.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Li L. Y., Nakajima H., Nomura T. Dose rate effectiveness and potentially lethal damage repair in normal and double-strand repair deficient murine cells by γ-rays and 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Lett., 123: 227-232, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Huet J., Laval F. Influence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors on the repair of sublethal and potentially lethal damage in gamma-irradiated mammalian cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. & Related Studies in Phys. Chem. And Medicine, 47: 655-662, 1985.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Arundel-Suto C. M., Scavone S. V., Turner W. R., Suto M. J., Sebolt-Leopold S. J. Effect of PD 128763, a new and potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, on X-ray induced cellular recovery processes in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Radiat. Res., 126: 367-371, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Rudat V., Kupper J. H., Wber K. J. Trans-dominant inhibition of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation leads to decreased recovery from ionizing radiation-induced cell killing. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 73: 325-330, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Guichard M., Weichselbaum R. R., Little J. B., Malaise E. P. Potentially lethal damage repair as a possible determinant of human tumor radiosensitivity. Radiother. Oncol., 1: 263-269, 1984.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Weichselbaum R. R., Schmit A., Little J. B. Radioresistant and repair proficient cells may determine radiocuribility in human tumours. Br. J. Cancer, 45: 637-639, 1986.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    Weichselbaum R. R., Schmit A., Little J. B. Cellular factors influencing radiocuribility of human malignant tumours. Br. J. Cancer, 45: 10-16, 1982.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Blunt T., Finnie N. J., Taccioli G. E., Smith G. C., Demengeot J., Gottlieb T. M., Mizuta R., Varghese A. J., Alt F. W., Jeggo P. A., Jackson S. P. Defective DNA-dependent protein kinase activity is linked to V(D)J recombination and DNA repair defects associated with the murine scid mutation. Cell, 80: 813-823, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Banin S., Moyal L., Shieh S., Taya Y., Anderson C. W., Chessa L., Smorodinsky N. I., Prives C., Reiss Y., Shiloh Y., Ziv Y. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage. Science (Wash. DC), 281: 1674-1677, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Tibbetts R. S., Brumbaugh K. M., Williams J. M., Sarkaria J. N., Cliby W. A., Shieh S. Y., Taya Y., Prives C., Abraham R. T. A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53. Genes Dev., 13: 152-157, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Wymann M. P., Bulgarelli-Leva G., Zvelebil M. J., Pirola L., Vanhaesebroeck B., Waterfield M. D., Panayotou G. Wortmannin inactivates phosphoinositide 3-kinase by covalent modification of Lys-802, a residue involved in the phosphate transfer reaction. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16: 1722-1733, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Grube K., Küpper J. H., Bürkle A. Direct stimulation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in permeabilised cells by double-stranded DNA oligomers. Anal. Biochem., 193: 236-239, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Bradley M. O., Kohn K. W. X.-ray induced DNA double strand break production and repair in mammalian cells as measured by neutral filter elution. Nucleic Acids Res., 7: 793-804, 1979.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Fornace A. J., Jr., Little J. B. DNA crosslinking induced by X-rays and chemical agents. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 477: 343-355, 1977.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Barendsen G. W., Van Bree C., Franken N. A. P. Importance of cell proliferative state and potentially lethal damage repair on radiation effectiveness: implications for combined tumor treatments (Review). Int. J. Oncol., 19: 247-256, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    Adams G. E. Failla Memorial Lecture. Redox, radiation, and reductive bioactivation. Radiat. Res., 132: 129-139, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Gregoire V., Hittelman W. N., Rosier J. F., Milas L. Chemo-radiotherapy: radiosensitizing nucleoside analogues. Oncol. Rep., 6: 949-957, 1999.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Horsman M. R. Nicotinamide and other benzamide analogs as agents for overcoming hypoxic cell radiation resistance in tumours. Acta Oncologica, 34: 571-587, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    Ward J. F. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 35: 95-125, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Dantzer F., de La Rubia G., Menissier-De Murcia J., Hostomsky Z., de Murcia G., Scheiber V. Base excision repair is impaired in mammalian cells lacking Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Biochemistry, 39: 7559-7569, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Prasad R., Lavrik O. I., Kim S. J., Kedar P., Yang X. P., Vande Berg B. J., Wilson S. H. DNA polymerase beta-mediated long patch base excision repair. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 stimulates strand displacement DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 32411-32414, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Ferguson D. O., Sekiguchi J. M., Chang S., Frank K. M., Gao Y., DePinho R. A., Alt F. W. The nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA repair is required for genomic stability and the suppression of translocations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 6630-6633, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Merkle D., Douglas P., Moorhead G. B., Leonenko Z., Yu Y., Cramb D., Bazett-Jones D. P., Lees-Miller S. P. The DNA-dependent protein kinase interacts with DNA to form a protein-DNA complex that is disrupted by phosphorylation. Biochemistry, 41: 12706-12714, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Smulson M. E., Pang D., Jung M., Dimtchev A., Chasovskikh S., Spoonde A., Simbulan-Rosenthal C., Rosenthal D., Yakovlev A., Dritschilo A. Irreversible binding of poly(ADP)ribose polymerase cleavage product to DNA ends revealed by atomic force microscopy: possible role in apoptosis. Cancer Res., 58: 3495-3498, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Calsou P., Frit P., Humbert O., Muller C., Chen D. J., Salles B. The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic activity regulates DNA end processing by means of Ku entry into DNA. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 7848-7856, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    D’Silva I., Pelletier J. D., Lagueux J., D’Amours D., Chaudhy M. A., Weinfeld M., Lees-Miller S. P., Poirier G. G. Relative affinities of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and DNA-dependent protein kinase for DNA strand interruptions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Protein Structure & Molecular Enzymology, 1430: 119-126, 1999.
  53. ↵
    Ariumi Y., Masutani M., Copeland T. D., Mimori T., Sugimura T., Shimotohno K., Ueda K., Hatanaka M., Noda M. Suppression of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity by DNA-dependent protein kinase in vitro. Oncogene, 18: 4616-4625, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Ruscetti T., Lehnert B. E., Halbrook J., Trong H. L., Hoekstra M. F., Chen D. J., Peterson S. R. Stimulation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 14461-14467, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Galande S., Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and Ku autoantigen form a complex and synergistically bind to matrix attachment sequences. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 20521-20528, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Xu W., Liu L., Smith G. C. M., Charles I. G. Nitric oxide upregulates expression of DNA-PKcs to protect cells from DNA-damaging anti-tumour agents. Nat. Cell Biol., 2: 329-345, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    Muller C., Chistodoulopoulos G., Salles B., Panasci L. DNA-dependent protein kinase activity correlates with clinical and in vitro senstivity of chonic lymphocytic leukemia lymphocytes to nitrogen mustards. Blood, 92: 2213-2219, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Sirzen F., Nilsson A., Zhivotovsky B., Lewensohn R. DNA-dependent protein kinase content and activity in lung carcinoma cell lines; correlation with intrinsic radiosensitivity. Eur. J. Cancer, 35: 111-116, 1999.
  59. ↵
    Muller C., Calsou P., Salles B. The activity of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) complex is determinant in the cellular response to nitrogen mustards. Biochimie, 82: 25-28, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    Shen H., Schultz M., Kruh G. D., Tew K. D. Increased expression of DNA-dependent protein kinase confers resistance to adriamycin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1381: 131-138, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    Kim S. H., Um J. H., Dong-Won B., Kwon B. H., Kim D. W., Chung B. S., Kang C. D. Potentiation of chemosensitivity in multidrug-resistant human leukemia CEM cells by inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase using wortmannin. Leukemia Res., 24: 917-925, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Frit P., Canitrot Y., Muller C., Foray N., Calsou P., Marangoni E., Bourhis J., Salles B. Cross-resistance to ionizing radiation in a murine leukemic cell line resistant to cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II); role of Ku autoantigen. Mol. Pharmacol., 56: 141-146, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Sak A., Stuschke M., Wurm R., Schoeder G., Sinn B., Wolf G., Budach V. Selective inactivation of DNA-dependent protein kinase with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides: consequences for the rejoining of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and radiosensitivity of human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 62: 6621-6624, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Peng Y., Zhang Q., Nagasawa H., Okasayu R., Liber H. L., Bedford J. S. Silencing expression of the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase by small interfering RNA sensitizes human cells for radiation-induced chomosome damage, cell killing and mutation. Cancer Res., 62: 6400-6404, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    Kim C-H., Park S-J., Lee S-H. A targeted inhibition of DNA-dependent protein kinase sensitizes breast cancer cells following ionizing radiation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 303: 753-759, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    Omori S., Takiguchi Y., Suda A., Sugimoto T., Miyazawa H., Takiguchi Y., Tanabe N., Tatsumi K., Kimura H., Pardington P. E., Chen F., Chen D. J., Kuriyama T. Suppression of a DNA double-strand break repair gene, Ku70, increases radio- and chemosensitivity in a human lung carcinoma cell line. DNA Rep., 1: 299-310, 2002.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 63 (18)
September 2003
Volume 63, Issue 18
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiosensitization and DNA Repair Inhibition by the Combined Use of Novel Inhibitors of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Radiosensitization and DNA Repair Inhibition by the Combined Use of Novel Inhibitors of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1
Stephany J. Veuger, Nicola J. Curtin, Caroline J. Richardson, Graeme C. M. Smith and Barbara W. Durkacz
Cancer Res September 15 2003 (63) (18) 6008-6015;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radiosensitization and DNA Repair Inhibition by the Combined Use of Novel Inhibitors of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1
Stephany J. Veuger, Nicola J. Curtin, Caroline J. Richardson, Graeme C. M. Smith and Barbara W. Durkacz
Cancer Res September 15 2003 (63) (18) 6008-6015;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Decitabine Sensitivity in Testicular Cancer
  • Drug-Induced Regulation of FA/BRCA Gene Expression
  • Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab: Enhanced Antitumor Activity
Show more Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement