Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Identification and Characterization of a Novel Gene, C13orf25, as a Target for 13q31-q32 Amplification in Malignant Lymphoma

Akinobu Ota, Hiroyuki Tagawa, Sivasundaram Karnan, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Abraham Karpas, Shigeki Kira, Yasuko Yoshida and Masao Seto
Akinobu Ota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Tagawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sivasundaram Karnan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinobu Tsuzuki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abraham Karpas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeki Kira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuko Yoshida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masao Seto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3773 Published May 2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of normal versus female. A, representative genomic profile of an array comparative genomic hybridization using normal male versus normal female DNAs. Six simultaneous hybridizations of normal male versus normal male were performed to define the normal variation in log2 ratio (log2 cy3/cy5). In the control experiment, >95% of the measured fluorescence log2 ratio values of each spot (2 × 1966 clones) ranged from +0.2 to −0.2 (data not shown). The thresholds for the log2 ratio of gains and loss were therefore set at log2 ratio of +0.2 and −0.2, respectively. Array data are plotted as the mean log2 ratio of duplicate spots for each clone. Vertical lines show the threshold for the log2 ratio of gains and loss. The log2 ratio for each of the bacterial artificial chromosome clone is plotted as a function of its genome location, with chromosome 1 to the left and X to the right; for each chromosome the order is short-arm telomeric to long-arm telomeric. B, normalized log2 ratio for the changes in copy number of X chromosome. The normal male DNA was used as reference for all hybridizations. Array hybridizations were performed with the test genomic DNA from a normal male (1 × chromosome), a normal female (2 × chromosomes), and three cell lines containing three, four, and five copies of the X chromosome. Each plot stands for the mean value of all normalized fluorescence ratio of 57 clones from the X chromosome. The ratio on each of the X chromosome clone was normalized by the mean fluorescence intensity ratio of autosomal chromosome clones. We defined the fluorescence intensity ratio of array-hybridization with normal male versus normal male as 0. Each plot was then computed on the basis of the normalized value. The line represents the linear regression through all of the data with a slope of 0.51 and an intercept of 0.72.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Genomic profiles of array comparative genomic hybridization. A, the representative genomic profile of array comparative genomic hybridization with Karpas 1718. The bacterial artificial chromosomes are ordered by position in the genome beginning at the 1p telomere and ending at the Xq telomere. The black arrow above the graph indicates high-level amplification (defined as log2 ratio >1). B, detailed genomic profiles of chromosome 13 in the three cell lines (Karpas 1718, Rec1, and OCI-Ly7) and one diffuse large B cell lymphoma patient (D778). The log2 ratio for each of the 68 bacterial artificial chromosomes and P-1 derived artificial chromosome clones is plotted as a function of its genome location, with chromosome 13q-centromere to the left and 13q-telomere to the right. ····, show the threshold for gains and loss. Bold arrows indicate high-level amplification (defined as log2 ratio >1) and thin arrows moderate-level amplification (0.2 > log2 ratio >1). Karpas 1718 shows a wide region of amplification extending over >50-Mb of chromosome 13q. Furthermore, high-level amplification in Karpas 1718 is observed from 13q22.2 to 13q31.3, with 13q31.3 in particular showing the highest amplification (log2 ratio >2). In the same manner, high-level amplification of OCI-Ly7 and Rec1 are shown at 13q31.3. Rec1 also shows wide loss in the vicinity of 13q31.3. The patient sample (D778) shows a wide region of amplification at 13q21.2–13q31.3 and 13q33.3-qter, with 13q31.1-q31.3 in particular indicating high-level amplification.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of cell lines with or without amplification at 13q31-q32. CGH results for four cell lines (Karpas 1718, Rec1, OCI-Ly4, and Jurkat) are shown. The lines to the right (green) and to the left (red) of each chromosome indicate the region gained or lost, respectively. Representative results of metaphase FISH with bacterial artificial chromosome, RP11–487A2 are shown on the right side of each panel. Chromosome 13 examined by CGH is also shown beside each ideogram. Three B-cell lymphoma cell lines, Karpas 1718 (A), Rec1 (B), and OCI-Ly4 (C) show amplification at 13q31-q32, but Jurkat (D) does not show one. FISH analysis shows amplification in >15 copies in the three B-cell lines, but no amplification in Jurkat. Each metaphase chromosome was counterstained by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Analysis of 13q31-q32 by a combination of array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). A, summarized data of DNA sequence copy numbers in three cell lines (Karpas 1718, OCI-Ly4, and Rec1) determined by interphase FISH using 19 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones of 13q31.3, including a new BAC, RP11–93M14, that was not used for array CGH. Ten interphase cells were analyzed and the average copy numbers of the BAC clone signals were counted for each cell line. The vertical line indicates the copy number and the horizontal dotted line indicates normal two copies. Embedded Image shows the common region of gain in copy number, which extended fromRP11–29C8 to RP11–93M14. The positions of STS markers and all BAC clones were confirmed from information archived by Ensembl Genome Data Resource. 5 The underlined BAC clones were used for FISH and array CGH. The thin arrow indicates the GPC5 gene loci. B, summarized data of array CGH analysis of three cell lines (Rec1, Karpas 1718, and OCI-Ly7) and one DLBCL patient (D778). The vertical line shows log2 ratio. ···· show the threshold for gain and loss set at log2 ratios of +0.2 and −0.2, respectively. Embedded Image shows the common region of high-level amplification (log2 ratio >1) in the three cell lines, which is extended from RP11–360A9 to RP11–481A22.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Northern blot analysis of the candidate gene for 13q31-q32 amplification. Northern hybridization was performed against 6 kinds of RNAs comprising human placenta (lane 1), 3 B-cell lymphoma cell lines (lane 2, Rec1; lane 3, Karpas 1718; and lane 4, OCI-Ly4) with amplification at 13q31-q32 and 2 T-cell lymphoma cell lines (lane 5, Jurkat and lane 6, ATN-1) without amplification. Representative and characteristic expression patterns of 8 of 30 ESTs and GPC5 are shown. Expression of GPC5 and BI481522 was not significantly different, whereas LOC160824, AF339828, BC040320, AF339802, LOC121734, AA705439, and N49442 showed clearly different patterns of expression. In particular, the expression of AF339828 and BC040320, which showed similar patterns of hybridization, demonstrates concordance with the gain in copy number at 13q31-q32.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Expression study of GPC5 and BC040320. Amplification status at 13q31-q32 in each of the cell lines and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients examined by conventional comparative genomic hybridization is indicated above names of the samples. A, expression pattern of GPC5 and BC040320 in cell lines and DLBCL patients with or without amplification at 13q31-q32. Expression of GPC5 in five cell lines and two DLBCL patients with amplification at 13q31-q32 is not significantly different from that of the other cell lines and patients without amplification. BC040320 is expressed in cell lines with amplification at 13q31-q32 (lanes 1–5) and at much lower levels in cell lines without amplification (lanes 6–8). In the same manner, BC040320 is strongly expressed in DLBCL patients with amplification at 13q31-q32 (lanes 9 and 10), but very weakly in cell lines without amplification (lanes 11 and 12). B, expression pattern of GPC5 and BC040320 in multiple cell lines with hematopoietic malignancies. Some cell lines (lanes 9, 11, and 12) with amplification at 13q31-q32 show weak signals when compared with the two cell lines (lanes 1 and 2) with high-level amplification. Expression of GPC5 shows very weak signals with some variations but without significant differences. AML, acute myeloid leukemia cell line. MM, multiple myeloma cell line. NK/T, natural killer/T-cell lymphoma/leukemia cell line. C, expression pattern of BC040320 and GPC5 in multiple normal tissues. Expression of BC040320 is hardly visible in normal tissues except for lung, thymus, and lymph node when compared with that of the two cell lines (lanes 1 and 2) with high-level amplification at 13q31-q32.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Exon-intron structure of the C13orf25 gene. A, two expressed sequence tags, BC040320 and AF339828, which are overexpressed in the cell lines with amplification at 13q31.3, are shown above the ····. BC040320 is split into four exons, encompassing two bacterial artificial chromosome clones, RP11–282D2 and RP11–121J7. AF339828 is located to the telomeric side of BC040320 and ∼300-bp apart from BC040320. The primer set used for reverse transcription-PCR is shown below the exons. B, two transcripts obtained by reverse transcription-PCR. One (Transcript-A) is the same as the BC040320 sequence consisting of four exons containing 965-bp nucleotides. The other (Transcript-B) consists of two exons containing 5058-bp nucleotides. Computer analysis showed that 32-AA polypeptides of bA121J7.2 (Vega gene ID) were encoded in the Transcript-A cDNA. Possible open reading frames are shown as Embedded Image. Five precursor microRNAs (miRNAs; miR91-precursor-13 micro RNA, miR18- precursor-13 micro RNA, miR19a- precursor-13 micro RNA, miR19b- precursor-13 micro RNA, and miR92- precursor-13 micro RNA), including seven mature microRNAs (microRNA miR-17, miR-91, miR-18, miR-19a, miR-20, miR-19b, and miR-92) were obtained from the Transcript-B sequence, and are shown by the ▪ in Transcript-B. C, polypeptides sequences are also shown below the structure. The polypeptides of 13 amino acids (AA) are shared by Transcript-A and Transcript-B, and are indicated by underlining.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    RT-PCRa analysis

    BAC clones, EST and STS Marker refer to the information obtained from Ensembl genome data resource. All BAC clones are included in RPCI-11 human male BAC library.

    BACEST/geneSTS MarkerForward primerReverse primerFBRec1Karpas 1718OCI-Ly4
    360A9AW664738D13S14575′-gccacatggtcaggttaaac5′-cttcactaccttgcgactct−NDND−
    27D9AA3091625′-ggctctcatttagctaaatg5′-aagaagtggttgagacaaca+b+++
    15N8No EST
    321E13AW236754D13S11755′-gagatggcacagcagttgaa5′-tagttcaaactctacctgca−NDND−
    447M23No EST
    370B1LOC1217235′-aactactggtgaggactgca5′-caagttccccttctgcagaa−NDND−
    AW0598675′-aaggcttagctattatgctg5′-acaatgaggaaaatctccca++c++++++
    275J18BC042969D13S18185′-ctggtcacacatccacaatg5′-cagtggaatctgagtcctag++++++
    AA6282995′-cagaaggagtgttaagtctg5′-caagaagaagctgccagtat++++++++
    143O10No EST
    309H8BG183515D13S12395′-ctcatgactgtaatcccagc5′-gtgatgccgtgaaatgagtc++++
    BG1919815′-ttcagtgacctcactgactg5′-gaggattttgcagtcatcgc−NDND−
    114G1LOC160824D13S7675′-aggttttgtcagccacacct5′-gaactatccgtaccttgtcc−++++
    75N6AA3982285′-ctgtaccattgtgcccagaa5′-atgactcagtccttctggct−NDND−
    86C3No ESTD13S265
    51A2No EST
    18M3No EST
    388D4LOC1447745′-cactgtggcagttatacggt5′-caatggttttccgcaccagt−NDND−
    LOC1217275′-cctgggaaggatggtttctt5′-ttacaacacaaggggcacac+++++
    409J23No EST
    392A19LOC1217295′-ggagccattacttcaagacc5′-agaccagtacttgtccagct+++++++
    BG7761865′-tggacacgtgagtgtgtttc5′-atgagctcaggcagctctat+++−+
    LOC1217285′-tgataggagacagacctgac5′-tccagtcatcctgaggtaga−NDND−
    BG1860785′-tcacacagtgtgactcacag5′-tgatctcctctctgtagtgcND−−+
    AA4878825′-acccaagggaatattgacac5′-gaagctagggaagcagtattND−−+
    BM5429915′-tgcagtaggtggcaatctca5′-tcgacttggactccatgaga−NDND−
    505P2BM695971D13S12345′-ccttggagtgcttaaggtag5′-actagggctctttgtagaccND−−++
    158A8AI0272785′-gctgtgattgcgaagaagtg5′-tccatatgtgagtgtggcagND−−+
    BG9272815′-acgccaagctctaatacgac5′-ctcgggctatggtatatgac−NDND−
    BI8254115′-accctggacaggtatggaat5′-accatgagcacagtgctcaa−NDND−
    AA8884115′-ctcccattgcagttactatg5′-gtcgacatgttgttgaggtt++++
    360H15AW5159665′-atgttcaccaggctggtctt5′-actaactctgtgggcttgca−NDND−
    BF8182195′-tctgcccactaacatctggt5′-cttgagtagctgagaccaca−NDND−
    114C3No EST
    432D3LOC144776D13S11905′-cacttccttgaaggggtttc5′-ctctgactcttgggcacaatND+++
    AI1263135′-ttgagacacagtcctgctct5′-gcagggcacaatgttttcag−NDND−
    319L6AV7310925′-attggtgaagccacctcaaa5′-caggctaacatggatctagtND−−+
    BG9417145′-agtgcctacttcctaagacc5′-tcaggaatcagtgcccaaacND−−+
    AI2629475′-ttgtgttcctggtccaccta5′-acattgggccggtcacttatND−−+
    AI4931275′-tcaaatcaactgcacctcag5′-cagttcgagacttcttccat−NDND−
    51B13BX0973355′-gaagtaggatggtgacacct5′-ctcagcaagtcatcctttgc−NDND−
    430K10AL701000D13S8865′-tggcctggagtaattagctg5′-atttagggggtaggagagcaND−−+
    LOC1608275′-ctgtgcactatcacttggga5′-taggctctaagccgttggtt−NDND−
    LOC1608265′-atggaatcaggttccctcca5′-ctgttcccttcatctgaatg−NDND−
    BQ4773305′-caaagtgctgggattacagg5′-gccagctttgctgcacatta−NDND−
    BQ4777415′-caacagaagatcggcccttt5′-actccctgaagcacagcattND+++
    AV7318475′-caggcacttgcttaagggat5′-aactagcctgcttcagcttc−NDND−
    BI4815225′-atgtgaagagaggtctcagc5′-agcaaaccacctagaggcttND+++
    BU7292875′-cttagcctaatctccctaggcgga5′-tatcaggtaggtggtccagtctcaND++++++
    BM7030785′-caggatcttgccctgttagt5′-tatcgggtggcgaacaagatND+++
    AA7196725′-tgtccttaggtagacattgt5′-ttcaacctctgagaaacccaNDNDND−
    LOC1217345′-acttcactgtcaacagcgag5′-agagaccacatgcttgccatND++++++
    BE4666875′-agttctggaggctaaaagtccagt5′-gccaaaatcacatggagagactacND+++
    282D2BF3529935′-gagaacagtaatttctttcc5′-tgcaattattggggtaaagcNDNDND−
    BC0403205′-gtcatacacgtggacctaac5′-ctgaagtctcaagtgggcatND++++++
    121J7AF3398285′-ctgacaagttctcagatcac5′-actctgcatgagcctagattND++++++
    AA7019265′-agaccctgatggtctcttta5′-ggctcaatgttttcctacggND++++++
    BF9080895′-tggaagaaaggacatgaggt5′-tctcatgaatccatgcccaaND+++
    AW8684815′-aagtaaatgtgagaagtagc5′-tgctcatcctcattgtataND−−+
    BX1073785′-taacctgagcagaatccagccttg5′-atggacccaaatgctgagaggaacND++++++
    AA5990015′-aagagggacttgctgtgttg5′-tgcacagacggtacagaagtND+++++
    GPC55′-cactggcgggtaaaggggac5′-agtattcagggaactgtcagtcacaccND+++
    AL0436385′-ccagtctatcattgatggac5′-gaagtgcctctgtaattggaND++++++
    AL7087345′-gtaatcccagcactttggga5′-tcttgttcttgtcccccagtND+++
    487A2AF339802D13S14905′-tacctgggtaaccaagactc5′-ctctgttcactgcattgaagND++++++
    H569195′-tgttgaccgactgagtgaac5′-ttatggtgaagtccttccccND++++
    AA7054395′-cgtactctagagttaaccaa5′-atgattgtaagttccctgagND++++++
    W868325′-atcctcatttctcaggggct5′-cctgtctgctctatgaagctND−−−
    N494425′-tggctgggcagaaatctgaa5′-tacaggtctgttcgccacatND++++++
    N335965′-tccctagcaatgtgatgtac5′-ctaaggtattcctaggctcaND−−+
    T849135′-gtagtaggtagaactgtcct5′-atctaccctcggcaattttcND++++++
    BU6561345′-tgctagggctggagtacaat5′-cattttctcttggctcacccND++++++
    93M14AW1054495′-ccagcaactgtaatacatgc5′-tcttcaaatccttgcctctgND−+++
    AV7546815′-acagccttctttggagagtg5′-tccaagggcacagtggaattND−++++
    • a RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome; EST, expressed sequence tag; FB, fetal brain; ND, not done; STS, sequenced tagged site.

    • b Detection of a thin band from the result of electrophoresis.

    • c Detection of a thick band from the result of electrophoresis.

  • Table 2

    Northern blot analysis

    Each signal of those ESTsa and GPC-5 was visually evaluated after 1-week expose.

    BACEST/geneProbe size (bp)Size (kb)Northern Blot
    PlacentaRec1Karpas 1718OCI-Ly4JurkatATN-1
    RP11-27D9AA309162130−−−−−−−
    RP11-370B1AW059867160−−−−−−−
    RP11-275J18BC042969440−−−−−−−
    AA628299220−−−−−−−
    RP11-309H8BG183515440−−−−−−−
    RP11-114G1LOC1608245506.5+++++++++++++++++++++
    RP11-388D4LOC121727420−−−−−−−
    RP11-392A19LOC1217293501.5+−−−−−
    RP11-158A8AA888411300−−−−−−−
    RP11-432D3LOC144776500−−−−−−−
    RP11-430K10BQ477741240−−−−−−−
    BI4815222105.5+++++++++
    BU729287460+−−−−−
    BM703078470−−−−−−−
    LOC1217342400.8+++++++++++++
    BE466687390−−−−−−−
    RP11-282D2BC0403204006−+++++++++++++++−−
    RP11-121J7AF3398284106−++++++++++++++++/−−
    AA701926240−−−−−−−
    BF908089100−−−−−−−
    BX107378420−−−−−−−
    AA599001200−−−−−−−
    GPC56005++++++
    AL043638200−−−−−−
    AL708734250−−−−−−−
    RP11-487A2AF3398023206+/−++++++++
    H56919160−−−−−−−
    AA70543929015++++++++/−+/−
    N4944232015++++++++/−+/−
    T84913200−−−−−−−
    BU656134390−−−−−−−
    • a EST, expression sequence tag; BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 64 (9)
May 2004
Volume 64, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Gene, C13orf25, as a Target for 13q31-q32 Amplification in Malignant Lymphoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Gene, C13orf25, as a Target for 13q31-q32 Amplification in Malignant Lymphoma
Akinobu Ota, Hiroyuki Tagawa, Sivasundaram Karnan, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Abraham Karpas, Shigeki Kira, Yasuko Yoshida and Masao Seto
Cancer Res May 1 2004 (64) (9) 3087-3095; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3773

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Gene, C13orf25, as a Target for 13q31-q32 Amplification in Malignant Lymphoma
Akinobu Ota, Hiroyuki Tagawa, Sivasundaram Karnan, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Abraham Karpas, Shigeki Kira, Yasuko Yoshida and Masao Seto
Cancer Res May 1 2004 (64) (9) 3087-3095; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3773
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • HSF1-Mediated Aneuploidy in p53-Defective Cells
  • Mechanisms of Invasive Urothelial Tumorigenesis
  • Alternate mRNA 3′ Processing Characterizes Distinct Tumors
Show more Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement