Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cell and Tumor Biology

Big Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Signaling Pathway Is Essential for Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis

Masaaki Hayashi, Colleen Fearns, Brian Eliceiri, Young Yang and Jiing-Dwan Lee
Masaaki Hayashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colleen Fearns
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Eliceiri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Young Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiing-Dwan Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4540 Published September 2005
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although big mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (BMK1) has been shown to be critical for embryonic angiogenesis, the role of BMK1 in tumor-associated neovascularization is poorly understood. Exogenous tumors were established in BMK1+/+, BMK1flox/+, or BMK1flox/flox mice carrying the Mx1-Cre transgene. Induced deletion of host BMK1 gene significantly reduced the volumes of B16F10 and LL/2 tumor xenografts in BMK1flox/flox mice by 63% and 72%, respectively. Examining the tumors in these induced BMK1-knockout animals showed a significant decrease in vascular density. Localized reexpression of BMK1 in BMK1-knockout mice by administration of adenovirus encoding BMK1 restored tumor growth and angiogenesis to the levels observed in wild-type mice. These observations were further supported by in vivo Matrigel plug assays in which vascular endothelial growth factor– and basic fibroblast growth factor–induced neovacularization was impaired by removing BMK1. Through screening with the Pepchip microarray, we discovered that in BMK1-knockout endothelial cells, phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) at Ser235/236 was mostly abrogated, and this BMK1-dependent phosphorylation required the activity of p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK). Immunofluorescent analysis of tumor vasculature from BMK1-knockout and control animals revealed a strong correlation between the presence of BMK1 and the phosphorylation of rpS6 in tumor-associated endothelial cells of blood vessels. As both RSK and rpS6 are known to be important for cell proliferation and survival, which are critical endothelial cell functions during neovascularization, these findings suggest that the BMK1 pathway is crucial for tumor-associated angiogenesis through its role in the regulation of the RSK-rpS6 signaling module.

  • Cellular, Molecular, and Tumor Biology
  • Signal transduction pathnways
  • Molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis
  • Tumor microcirculation and microenvironment
  • Endothelial cell functions

Introduction

Four major mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways have been identified in mammals: extracellular signal regulated kinases (ERK1/2), c-jun-NH2-kinases (JNK1-3), p38s (p38α, β, γ, and δ), and BMK1 MAP kinases. Like the other MAP kinases, the BMK1 pathway is activated by a wide variety of mitogens, including epithelial growth factor, nerve growth factor, lysophosphatidic acid, phorbol ester, and stress stimuli such as H2O2, UV irradiation, and laminar flow shear stress. In the last few years, genetically modified mice targeting these signaling pathways have been generated ( 1). Mice deficient in BMK1 developed cardiovascular defects, which resulted in embryonic lethality around 10.5 days postcoitum ( 2– 5). In these mice, vasculogenesis did occur but the resulting vasculature failed to mature. Endothelial cells lining the vessels and in the developing heart displayed a disorganized, rounded morphology ( 2– 4). Impaired angiogenesis was observed in both the embryo proper and the extraembryonic tissue including yolk sac and placenta ( 3– 5). Although failure of heart tube going to rightward looping has been reported ( 3), this phenotype in conventional BMK1-knockout (BMK1-KO) mutants seems to be a secondary phenomenon of the dying embryos caused by the endothelial defect, as mice lacking the BMK1 gene specifically in cardiomyocytes developed normally whereas endothelial-specific ablation of BMK1 in animal resulted in cardiovascular defects similar to that observed in the conventional knockout mice ( 2). In addition to the functional importance of BMK1 during embryonic angiogenesis, BMK1 is also indispensable for the maintenance of vascular integrity in adult mice, as induced ablation of BMK1 in adult mice led to lethality after 3 to 4 weeks due to the endothelial failure. However, the apparent existence of a vascular network in mutant embryos and the relatively long period before death in adult mice after BMK1 ablation suggest that endothelial cells lacking BMK1 may still have some angiogenic potential.

Pathologic angiogenesis, such as tumor-associated angiogenesis, is distinct from physiologic angiogenesis in many aspects. The neovascularization triggered by tumors is recognized as being distinctively aberrant: disordered not only architecturally (as a maze of dilated, saccular, tortuous microvessels) but also histologically (lacking support cells such as pericytes) and hemodynamically (being leaky, with intermittent, static, and even reverse blood flow; refs. 6, 7). As the BMK1 pathway is critical for physiologic neovascularization, we examined whether this cascade plays a role in vasculature development in tumors. By inducing the deletion of host BMK1 gene in BMK1flox/flox mice bearing xenograft tumors, we found that BMK1 pathway was required for tumor growth due to its essential role in the development of tumor vasculature. Pepchip microarray with total cellular proteins from BMK1-deficient endothelial cells showed that phosphorylation of rpS6 in these cells is significantly reduced. Further investigation showed that rpS6 phosphorylation was also attenuated in the BMK1-KO endothelial cells of tumor vasculature. These data suggest that the BMK1 pathway is critical for tumor-associated angiogenesis, possibly through its action on rpS6 phosphorylation in endothelial cells.

Materials and Methods

In vivo tumor growth and angiogenesis. We have previously reported a mouse model (conditional BMK1 knockout) in which ablation of the BMK1 gene can be induced by polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (pIpC) injection ( 2). In this animal model, the copy number of the BMK1 floxed allele can be a factor influencing the clinical outcome. That is, BMK1flox/−, Mx1-Cre(+) mice started dying as early as 9 days after Cre induction following three pIpC injections, whereas the earliest onset of death for BMK1flox/flox, Mx1-Cre(+) mice was at 19 days postinduction. These findings suggest that the efficiency of Cre recombination in endothelial cells determines the survival period, leading us to speculate that besides the gene copy number, the total numbers of pIpC injections may also alter the clinical outcome of BMK1flox/flox, Mx1-Cre(+) mice. Indeed, reducing the pIpC injection to a single dose significantly delayed the onset of death of BMK1flox/flox, Mx1-Cre(+) mice. In our preliminary experiment, all mice were apparently healthy until 4 weeks and died between 5 and 7 weeks after pIpC injection, whereas mice which received three pIpC injections became sick at 2 to 3 weeks. Cre expression, an indication of BMK1 deletion, was detectable in endothelial cells under the condition of a single administration of pIpC ( Fig. 1A ). Under this experimental condition, we sought the possible involvement of BMK1 in tumor angiogenesis. Eight- to twelve-week-old mice were first injected i.p. with 250 μg pIpC. Five days later, 1 × 106 tumor cells of B16F10 melanoma or LL/2 Lewis lung carcinoma (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) in 500 μL of DMEM were inoculated s.c. into the right flank region of the mice. All studies were approved by The Scripps Research Institute Animal Care and Use Committee and complied with NIH guidelines. Tumor growth was monitored every other day with calipers. Tumor volume was calculated by the equation, V = (L × W2) × 0.5 (V, volume; L, length; and W, width). For immunohistochemical studies, B16F10 and LL/2 tumors were resected from mice 14 and 16 days after tumor implantation, respectively.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Ablation of the BMK1 gene in mice inhibits the growth of xenograft tumors. A, time schedule of tumor xenograft and immunohistochemical analysis of the Cre expression in aorta. Mice carrying the Mx1-Cre transgene with the genotypes of BMK1+/+ (WT), BMK1flox/+ (BMK1-HT), and BMK1flox/flox (BMK1-KO) were injected i.p. with 250 μg pIpC to induce deletion of the floxed BMK1 gene, followed by the implantation of B16F10 melanoma or LL/2 Lewis lung carcinoma cells 5 days after pIpC injection. Tumor volume was monitored every other day. The expression of Cre recombinase after pIpC induction was detected along the aortic inner wall by immunohistochemical staining using an anti-Cre antibody. B, representative image showing the growth of xenograft LL/2 tumors at the time of sacrifice. B16F10 (C) or LL/2 tumors (D) grown in BMK1-WT, BMK1-HT, and BMK1-KO mice were measured at the indicated day after initial B16F10 or LL/2 cell injection. Points, mean (n = 8 in each group); bars, SD. **, P < 0.01, compared with WT and heterozygous mice.

In vivo matrigel angiogenesis assay. Matrigel (Growth Factor Reduced, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) at 4°C was mixed with or without 100 ng/mL vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) or 400 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; PeproTech) in a final volume of 0.5 mL. The Matrigel mixture was then injected s.c. into the right flank region of pIpC-induced BMK1flox/flox mice with or without the Mx1-Cre transgene 5 days after pIpC injection. The plugs were removed 7 days after Matrigel implantation, fixed in Bouin's solution for 24 hours, and then embedded in paraffin. All tissues were sectioned, mounted onto slides, and stained with Masson's trichrome. In another group, plugs were homogenized in Drabkin's reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After centrifugation, the supernatants were filtered through 0.45-μm filters, and the hemoglobin content was measured at the wavelength of 540 nm following the instructions of the manufacturer.

Computer-assisted morphometric analysis of vasculature. For the analysis of tumor vessels, representative sections obtained from five tumors from each cell clone were photographed with a SPOT digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI), and morphometric analyses were done using Scion Image software (Frederick, MD). Three random fields were examined at ×10 magnification, and the number of vessels per square millimeter and average vessel size were determined. For the analysis of angiogenesis in Matrigel implants, sections from three plugs per group were examined and the total number of pixels of microvessels from five 10× fields was calculated and averaged.

Statistics. Tumor volume and the area and size of CD31-positive vessels were compared by using two-sided unpaired t test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Cell culture, chemicals, and plasmid. The mouse lung capillary endothelial cells (MLCEC) and mouse adult fibroblasts (MAF) were generated from BMK1flox/flox mice carrying SV40-T transgene and maintained as previously described ( 2). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were purchased from Cambrex BioScience (Rockland, ME) and were cultured using EGM-2 BulletKit (Cambrex BioScience). The plasmid encoding dominant-negative RSK1 (K112/464R) was a gift from Dr. Blenis, Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA).

PepChip kinase screening. PepChip kinase, a microarray containing 1,152 synthetic kinase substrate peptides, was purchased from Pepscan systems (Lelystad, Netherlands). MLCECs and MAFs were infected with either empty adenovirus (Ad-EV) or recombinant adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre) for 12 hours in six-well plates (1 × 104 particles per cell). Two days after infection, cells were lysed in 25 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.6), 50 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.1 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and the cleared supernatants were used for the screening according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The microarrays were scanned by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) with a resolution of 50 μm. Evaluation of the data was done using ImageQuant software. Normalization of signal intensity of each peptide was done according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

Antibodies. The antibodies against the phosphorylated forms of rpS6 (Ser235/236 and Ser240/244), p70S6K (Thr389), p90RSK (Thr359/Ser363), Akt (Ser473), MAP/ERK kinase (MEK)1/2 (Ser217/221), ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), JNK (Thr183/Tyr185), and p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) in conjunction with the antibodies against these molecules, regardless of their phosphorylation status, were purchased from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). The anti-actin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The mouse monoclonal anti-HA and anti-FLAG antibodies were purchased from Covance (12CA5; Princeton, NJ) and Stratagene (M2; La Jolla, CA), respectively. The anti-BMK1 antibody was previously described ( 9).

Topical administration of adenovirus. Recombinant adenovirus encoding BMK1 (Ad-BMK1) or βGal (Ad-βGal) was injected separately into the skin site of tumor implants of pIpC-induced BMK1flox/flox, Mx1-Cre(+), and BMK1+/+, Mx1-Cre(+) mice once a week (1 × 1010 viral particles/100 μL) for a total of three administrations.

Results

The BMK1 pathway in host BMK1-floxed mice is essential for the growth of B16F10 melanoma and LL/2 Lewis lung tumor xenografts. BMK1+/+, BMK1flox/+, and BMK1flox/flox mice [hereinafter referred to as wild-type (WT), BMK1-heterozygous (BMK1-HT), and BMK1-knockout (BMK1-KO), respectively] carrying the Mx1-Cre transgene were injected with pIpC followed by inoculation of B16F10 melanoma cells or LL/2 Lewis lung carcinoma cells using the timeline denoted in Fig. 1A. The tumors which developed in BMK1-KO mice were significantly smaller than those in WT and BMK1-HT mice ( Fig. 1B). The reduced tumor growth in BMK1-KO mice was observed from 6 to 8 days after implantation to the day tumor excision was done ( Fig. 1C and D). At excision, the mean B16F10 tumor size was 63% and 18% smaller in BMK1-KO and BMK1-HT mice, respectively, than that in WT mice ( Fig. 1C), and the mean LL/2 tumor size was 72% and 22% smaller in BMK1-KO and BMK1-HT mice, respectively, than that in WT mice by 16 days ( Fig. 1D). Because only the host BMK1 gene, but not the tumor BMK1 gene, was deactivated by pIpC treatment, the retarded tumor development observed in BMK1-HT and BMK1-KO mice indicated that the host BMK1 pathway is critical for supporting the growth of tumor xenografts.

The vascular development within B16F10 and LL/2 tumors was significantly suppressed in BMK1 knockout mice. As the BMK1 pathway is involved in embryonic angiogenesis, we wondered whether this pathway is also involved in development of tumor vasculature, which may account for the reduced tumor growth observed in BMK1-KO mice. We compared vessel density and vessel morphology between the tumor sections from WT and BMK1-KO mice by immunohistochemical staining with an antibody against CD31, an endothelial cell marker. The vascularization in tumors from BMK1-KO mice ( Fig. 2C and D ) was significantly reduced compared with tumors from WT mice ( Fig. 2A and B). Quantification of the vascularization by counting the CD31-positive vessels revealed that the vascular density in the B16F10 melanoma and LL/2 tumors of BMK1-KO mice was decreased ( Fig. 2E). Within the tumors, the overall number of vessels, regardless of their size, was lower in BMK1-KO mice, but more significantly, the number of larger vessels was greatly diminished in these mice ( Fig. 2F). Thus, retarded tumor growth in BMK1-KO animals correlated with a decreased number and with significantly smaller blood vessels within these tumors.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Deletion of BMK1 gene in mice inhibits tumor-associated angiogenesis. Immunohistochemical images of tumor sections stained with anti-CD31 antibody showed a decreased number of tumor microvessels in BMK1-KO mice (C and D) compared with WT mice (A and B). Reduced vascularization was found in B16F10 melanomas (A and C) and LL/2 Lewis lung carcinomas (B and D). Bar, 50 μm. Quantitative analysis of tumor-associated blood vessels revealed a marked inhibition of tumor angiogenesis in BMK1-KO mice, as shown by the noticeable reduction (*, P < 0.05) in the average area covered by blood vessels (E) and the significant decrease (**, P < 0.01) of the average blood vessel size (F). CD31-positive blood vessels were evaluated in three different 10× fields in sections obtained from five different tumors of each tumor cell line in mice. Columns, mean (n = 5 in each group); bars, SD.

Vascular endothelial growth factor– and basic fibroblast growth factor–induced angiogenesis in Matrigel plugs was abrogated in BMK1 knockout mice. VEGF and bFGF are angiogenic growth factors secreted by a number of different types of cancers including melanoma, breast, pancreas, and lung carcinoma ( 10– 13). Because we showed that the BMK1 pathway is critical for neovascularization associated with lung carcinoma and melanoma ( Fig. 2), we wondered whether BMK1 has a role in VEGF- and bFGF-induced angiogenesis. To investigate this, pIpC-induced BMK1flox/flox mice with or without the Mx1-Cre transgene (hereafter referred to as BMK1-KO and control mice, respectively) were implanted with Matrigel 5 days after pIpC injection. As shown in Fig. 3 , few host endothelial cells migrated into the Matrigel implants in the absence of growth factors, regardless of their genotype. However, in the presence of either VEGF or bFGF, endothelial cells of control mice extensively migrated into the Matrigel implants, and generated a vessel network as judged by the containment of erythrocytes. The aggressive angiogenesis resulted in absorption of the Matrigel plugs and led to partial destruction of the implants ( Fig. 3A and B). In contrast, in BMK1-KO mice, although endothelial cells migrated into the Matrigel implants, they stayed at the periphery and failed to form functional vessels. Quantification of the blood vessels in the Matrigel implants revealed a significant drop in BMK1-KO mice compared with those in their control littermates ( Fig. 3C and E). Functional vessel formation within the implants was estimated by measuring the hemoglobin content within the excised implants. We found 82% and 87% reductions of hemoglobin content in BMK1-KO mice compared with that in control mice with plugs containing VEGF and bFGF, respectively ( Fig. 3D and F). These results indicated that the BMK1 cascade was critically required for both VEGF- and bFGF-induced angiogenesis.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Inhibition of VEGF- and bFGF-induced angiogenesis by BMK1 ablation in vivo. Cross sections of matrigel plugs stained with Masson's trichrome. BMK1flox/flox mice with or without the Mx1-Cre transgene were injected i.p. with 250 μg pIpC. Five days later, 500 μL Matrigels were mixed with or without VEGF (final concentration, 100 ng/mL; A) or bFGF (final concentration 400 ng/mL; B), implanted s.c. and then harvested 7 days after implantation. Bar, 10 μm. C and E, quantification of vascular density in cross sections of Matrigel plugs with or without VEGF and bFGF, respectively. D and F, assessment of hemoglobin content in Matrigel plugs with or without VEGF and bFGF, respectively. Columns, mean (n = 3 in each group); bars, SD. **, P < 0.01, compared with VEGF- or bFGF-containing plugs implanted in BMK1flox/flox, Mx1-Cre(−) mice.

BMK1 is critical for the Ser235/236 phosphorylation of rpS6 in endothelial cells, but not in fibroblasts. We previously showed that BMK1 was critical for angiogenesis through the role of BMK1 in endothelial cells. Therefore, studying the molecular actions of BMK1 in endothelial cells should help us understand the BMK1-dependent regulatory mechanism(s) for tumor-associated neovascularization. To decipher the molecular role of BMK1 in endothelial cell, we established two cell lines from BMK1flox/flox mice derived from either MLCECs or from MAFs ( 2). These two cell lines were infected with recombinant adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre) to remove the BMK1 gene or infected with empty virus (Ad-EV) as a control.

Protein extracts from these treated cells were separately used in in vitro kinase reactions on a Pepchip microarray for analyzing the phosphorylation profiles of kinase substrates in these cells with or without the presence of BMK1 protein. As the MLCEC and MAFs were isolated from BMK1flox/flox mice carrying a temperature-sensitive SV40 large T-antigen, it was possible that the presence of SV40 T-antigen may affect the experimental outcome. To eliminate this possibility, protein extracts from MLCECs or MAFs grown at 37°C, a nonpermissive condition for SV40 T-antigen, were used in these experiments. Among 1,152 synthetic peptides on the microarray coding for known phosphoacceptor sites of natural proteins, we found that peptides containing the Ser235/236 of rpS6 showed considerable reduction in phosphorylation in BMK1-depleted MLCECs, but not in control MLCECs ( Table 1 ; Fig. 4A ). Moreover, peptides that encode serine residues other than Ser235/236 of rpS6 did not show altered phosphorylation after BMK1 ablation in MLCECs ( Table 1). The level of Ser235/236 phosphorylation of rpS6 between BMK1-depleted MAFs and control MAFs, however, was about the same. These results were further confirmed by immunoblot analysis using an antibody against phosphorylated Ser235/236 of rpS6 ( Fig. 4B). As shown in Fig. 4B, the level of rpS6 phosphorylation was significantly reduced in BMK1-deleted MLCECs grown at 37°C compared with that in control MLCECs. Interestingly, activation of the Raf-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 MAP kinase pathway was observed in MLCECs without BMK1, suggesting that this increased activity of ERK1/2 was not enough to compensate for the abrogated rpS6 phosphorylation induced by BMK1 deficiency ( Fig. 4B). Moreover, introduction of exogenous BMK1 in BMK1-depleted MLCECs by infecting these MLCECs with recombinant adenovirus encoding BMK1 restored the phosphorylation of rpS6 to the level of control MLCECs ( Fig. 4C). These results suggest that BMK1 is critical for rpS6 phosphorylation at Ser235/236 in endothelial cells. As rpS6 is a ribosomal protein in the translational apparatus, and phosphorylation of rpS6 is known to stimulate or facilitate the activation of protein synthesis, it is very likely that the BMK1 pathway regulates endothelial cell function by controlling the translational apparatus in these cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Signal intensity of rpS6 peptide in the Pepchip screening

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

BMK1 is critical for the phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 in MLCECs, but not in MAFs. A, identification of rpS6 as a downstream target of BMK1 by Pepchip microarray screening. Protein extracts from BMK1flox/flox MLCEC and MAF infected with either control adenovirus (Ad-EV) or recombinant adenovirus encoding Cre recombinase (Ad-Cre) were used for Pepchip microarray screening as described in Materials and Methods. Autoradiograms of identical subarrays of each treated microarray. Arrows, phosphorylated peptide corresponding to amino acids 231 to 239 of rpS6, which is also shown as peptide no. 1 in Table 1. B, decreased phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 in MLCEC lacking BMK1. Cell lysates from BMK1flox/flox MLCEC infected with or without Ad-Cre under permissive (32°C) or nonpermissive (37°C) conditions as noted were subjected to immunoblot analysis using indicated antibodies. C, restoration of the Ser235/236 phosphorylation of rpS6 by introduction of exogenous BMK1. Total cell lysates were harvested from BMK1flox/flox MLCECs and MAFs infected with the recombinant adenovirus expressing Cre (Ad-Cre) and/or BMK1 (Ad-BMK1) as indicated, followed by immunoblot analysis using antibodies as noted.

BMK1-p90 ribosomal S6 kinase signaling pathway regulates the basic fibroblast growth factor–mediated rpS6 phosphorylation at Ser235/236 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. As the Ser235/236 phosphorylation sites of rpS6 are not proline-directed residues, it is likely that BMK1 regulates these sites through another kinase. Two kinases, p70/85 ribosomal S6 kinase (S6K) and p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), have been shown to directly phosphorylate rpS6 ( 14, 15). To investigate the role of the BMK1 pathway in regulating these two rpS6-upstream kinases during bFGF-mediated endothelial cell activation, we expressed a dominant-negative form of MEK5, MEK5A, which can specifically block the signal flow to BMK1 during cell activation, in HUVECs ( 9). The bFGF-induced activation of BMK1, along with activation of RSK, and the phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 were blocked by expression of MEK5A. In contrast, the bFGF-mediated up-regulation of S6K activity and the phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser240/244 were not affected by the presence of MEK5A ( Fig. 5A ). These results suggested that the BMK1 pathway is required for the activation of RSK and the subsequent phosphorylation of Ser235/236 of rpS6 during activation of endothelial cells by bFGF. This notion was further supported by data showing that specific activation of the BMK1 pathway in endothelial cells using the dominant active form of MEK5, MEK5D, stimulated RSK activity and the phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 ( Fig. 5B). The requirement of RSK activity in BMK1-induced rpS6 phosphorylation at Ser235/236 was shown by blocking BMK1-dependent rpS6 phosphorylation using a dominant-negative form of RSK in endothelial cells ( Fig. 5C). Together, these data implied that the BMK1-RSK signaling module is critical for the phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 during bFGF-induced activation of HUVECs.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

BMK1-p90 RSK signaling module contributes to the Ser235/236 phosphorylation of rpS6 in endothelial cells. A, HUVECs were infected with Ad-MEK5A, and after 24 hours these cells were transferred into growth factor–depleted media for another 24 hours followed by stimulation with 40 ng/mL bFGF for 20 minutes. Total cell lysates were prepared and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antibodies as indicated. B, HUVECs were infected with Ad-MEK5D and/or Ad-BMK1, and after 24 hours these cells were starved for 24 hours. Total cell lysates were then prepared and analyzed by immunoblot using indicated antibodies. C, inhibition of BMK1-mediated rpS6 phosphorylation by dominant-negative RSK1 (Ad-DN-RSK1). HUVECs were infected with Ad-MEK5D and Ad-BMK1 with or without Ad-DN-RSK1 as indicated. After 24 hours, these cells were starved and total cell lysates were then prepared and analyzed by immunoblot using indicated antibodies.

The Ser235/236 phosphorylation of rpS6 was reduced in tumor vessels in BMK1 knockout mice. To examine the phosphorylation state of rpS6 at Ser235/236 during tumor angiogenesis, sections of LL/2 tumors harvested from WT and BMK1-KO mice were coimmunostained with an antibody against CD31 (an endothelial cell surface marker) and an antibody against phosphorylated Ser235/236 of rpS6. Based on the CD31 staining, blood vessels in tumors from BMK1-KO mice were significantly fewer in number and noticeably smaller in size than the tumor vasculature found in WT mice ( Fig. 6A and B ). Phosphorylation of Ser235/236 was observed in endothelial cells of tumor vessels in WT mice, but was barely detectable in endothelial cells of tumor vasculature in BMK1-KO tumor ( Fig. 6G-J). As the BMK1 gene in the implanted cancer cells is not floxed and thus cannot be deleted by Cre activity induced by pIpC ( 2), it was not surprising to see that phosphorylation of Ser235/236 of rpS6 was similar in tumor cells surrounding the tumor vasculature of both WT and BMK1-KO mice ( Fig. 6C and D). These results showed that the reduced phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 site coincided with the ablation of BMK1 gene in endothelial cells of tumor vasculature, which implied that the BMK1 pathway regulates tumor angiogenesis, at least in part, through phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Ser235/236 phosphorylation of rpS6 was reduced by BMK1 removal in endothelial cells of tumor vasculature. Fluorescent microscopic images of LL/2 tumor sections from WT (A, C, E, G, and I) and BMK1-KO (B, D, F, H and J) mice were stained with anti-CD31 antibody (red; A and B), anti-Ser235/236 phosphorylated rpS6 antibody (green; C and D), or with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue; E and F). G and H, merged images; I and J, higher magnifications of these images, respectively. Original magnification, ×200.

Reexpressing BMK1 in BMK1 knockout mice restored tumor growth, angiogenesis, and phosphorylation of rpS6. To further strengthen the notion that retarded tumor growth in BMK1-KO mice is due to the defect in neovascularization of the tumors, but not due to the other defects caused by systemic deletion of BMK1 in these mice, we topically injected recombinant adenovirus encoding BMK1 (Ad-BMK1) or βGal (Ad-βGal) into the skin site of tumor implants of pIpC-induced BMK1flox/flox, Mx1-Cre(+), and BMK1+/+, Mx1-Cre(+) mice. The tumors in Ad-BMK1–infected KO mice were significantly larger than those grown in Ad-βGal–infected KO mice, whereas tumors grown in Ad-BMK1–infected WT mice were similar to those grown in Ad-βGal–infected WT mice ( Fig. 7A and B ). Tumor vasculature in Ad-BMK1–infected KO mice was better developed than that in Ad-βGal–infected KO mice, whereas the development of tumor vasculature in Ad-BMK1–infected WT mice was comparable to that in Ad-βGal–infected WT mice ( Fig. 7C). In addition, immunofluorescent analysis of a cross section of the tumor from Ad-BMK1–infected KO mice revealed that the phosphorylation of rpS6, compared with that in Ad-βGal–infected mice, was restored ( Fig. 7C). These findings strengthen the notion that the BMK1 signaling pathway is critical for tumor-associated angiogenesis through regulation of rpS6 phosphorylation in endothelial cells.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Reexpressing BMK1 in BMK1-KO mice in the local environment restored tumor growth, angiogenesis, and the phosphorylation of rpS6. Reexpressing BMK1 by the injection of recombinant adenovirus encoding BMK1 (Ad-BMK1) into the skin site of tumor implants in BMK1-KO mice restored the tumor growth of B16F10 melanoma cells (A) and LL/2 Lewis lung carcinoma cells (B). Points, mean (n = 3 in each group); bars, SD. The tumors in Ad-BMK1–infected KO mice were significantly larger than those grown in Ad-βGal–infected KO mice (*, P < 0.05). C, fluorescent microscopic images of LL/2 tumor sections from WT and BMK1-KO mice topically injected with recombinant adenovirus encoding β-Gal (Ad-βGal) or BMK1 (Ad-BMK1). These sections were stained with anti-CD31 antibody (red, left) or with anti-Ser235/236 phosphorylated rpS6 antibody (green, middle) as in Fig. 6. Right, merged images (yellow). Original magnification, ×200.

Discussion

It has been shown that the BMK1 signaling pathway plays a key role in supporting the uncontrolled growth of certain human carcinoma by mediating oncogenic signals from deregulated ErbB or Ras and in providing survival signals against chemotherapy to human tumor cells as well ( 16– 18). Moreover, the poor prognosis and bony metastasis of human prostate cancer has been attributed to up-regulation of BMK1 activity ( 19). However, the role of BMK1 in carcinogenesis is not limited to its contribution to the malignant nature of tumor cells. In this study, we showed that deletion of the host BMK1 gene substantially inhibited the development of tumor vasculature and consequently blocked the growth of exogenous tumors in two tumor xenograft models, indicating that the BMK1 pathway plays a major role in the neovascularization associated with tumors.

Within four mammalian MAP kinase pathways (ERK1/2, JNKs, p38s, and BMK1) identified thus far, two of them, ERK1/2 and BMK1, mainly mediate intracellular signaling from growth factors, and the other two pathways, JNKs and p38s, are largely involved in cellular responses induced by stress stimuli. Deregulation of both MEK1/2-ERK1/2 and MEK5-BMK1 pathways has been strongly implicated in tumorigenesis. In fact, administration of MEK1/2 inhibitors to tumor-bearing mice not only delays tumor growth in tumor xenograft mouse models ( 20) but also inhibits the metastasis of the cancer ( 21). In light of these promising results, U0126 and PD184352 are currently in phase I and phase II clinical trials, respectively, for cancer treatment ( 22). However, recent studies have reported that U0126 and PD184352 can also inhibit MEK5, although requiring a slightly higher dose, raising the possibility that attenuation of MEK5-BMK1 signaling pathway may also contribute to the antitumor effect of these compounds because the BMK1 pathway is required not only for the uncontrolled proliferation of tumor cells but also for the generation of new blood vessels within tumors, as shown herein.

Activation of protein synthesis by growth factors is an essential step for cell cycle progression, and its inhibition causes cell growth arrest in G0-G1 ( 23, 24). rpS6, one of 30 ribosomal proteins, has been implicated in enhancing the translation of mRNA possessing unique 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine sequences in the 5′-untranslated region. 5′-Terminal oligopyrimidine mRNAs generally encode ribosomal proteins, thereby increasing the overall translational capacity of cells ( 25). Phosphorylation of rpS6 at multiple sites is one of the early intracellular responses to growth factor stimulation. Two families of kinases, S6K ( 26– 29) and RSK ( 30), are known to phosphorylate rpS6 in vitro and in vivo. Until recently, it was generally believed that S6K is the sole kinase responsible for the rpS6 phosphorylation in somatic cells in vivo as the capability of RSK to phosphorylate rpS6 in these cells has been controversial. However, a recent study characterizing S6K2−/− and S6K1−/−/S6K2−/− MEFs and hepatocytes showed the predominant role of S6K2 in rpS6 phosphorylation and showed the existence of another rpS6 kinase of which activation cannot be blocked by rapamycin but by the MAP kinase inhibitor U0126 ( 31). This rpS6 kinase has been shown to phosphorylate rpS6 at the Ser235/236 in adult hepatocytes. As RSK is the direct substrate for ERK1/2 and BMK1 and a known physiologic rpS6 kinase during Xenopus ( 32) and mouse ( 33) meiotic maturation, RSK has been recognized as the kinase thought to be responsible for the rpS6 phosphorylation at Ser235/236 in the absence of S6K1 and S6K2 ( 31). This notion has been reinforced by our finding that blocking the activation of RSK significantly reduced the BMK1-mediated phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 in endothelial cells.

The functional importance of rpS6 in animals is underscored by the conditional ablation of rpS6 in hepatocytes ( 34). In these mice, hepatocytes failed to proliferate after partial hepatectomy due to the blockage in ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle progression. Because there is no report on mice with endothelial cell–specific knockout of rpS6, it is unclear whether rpS6 is also indispensable for the growth and proliferation of endothelial cell, which are critical for neovascularization. However, vasculature in tumors from WT mice contains large functional vessels with strong endothelial cell staining of phosphorylated rpS6, whereas the blood vessels in tumors from BMK1-KO mice were poorly formed and were characterized by a lower level of rpS6 phosphorylation in endothelial cells. Thus, there is a positive correlation between the phosphorylation of rpS6 at Ser235/236 in the endothelial cells of tumor vessels and the number and size of tumor vasculature, supporting the notion that phosphorylation of rpS6 by the BMK1 signaling pathway in endothelial cells is important for their angiogenic potential in tumor-associated angiogenesis.

A considerable number of drugs/antibodies have been developed in an attempt to block tumor angiogenesis. Most of them are focused on extracellular molecules, such as VEGF, FGF, and endothelial-specific receptor tyrosine kinases ( 35). Drugs designed to inhibit the intracellular signaling pathways, which are critical for endothelial cell growth and survival, are considerably less, possibly because these pathways play critical roles not only in endothelial cells but also in other cell types. It is worth noting that mice lacking BMK1 specifically in several different cell types, such as cardiomyocytes, neuron, hepatocytes, and mammary epithelial cells, all developed normally without any overt adverse phenotype and have the same life span as their control littermates ( 36). The only cell type, thus far, affected by the loss of BMK1 is endothelial cells. Importantly, we showed herein that the BMK1 pathway is critically involved in the development of tumor vasculature, mostly likely through its role in regulating the RSK-rpS6 pathway in endothelial cells. Therefore, a pharmacologic inhibitor targeting the BMK1 pathway in vivo should affect primarily endothelial cells especially during generation of tumor vasculature, with minimal effect on the normal function of many other cell types.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: National Cancer Institute grant CA079871 and Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program grant BC031105.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Received December 20, 2004.
  • Revision received May 26, 2005.
  • Accepted June 20, 2005.
  • ©2005 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Kuida K, Boucher DM. Functions of MAP kinases: insights from gene-targeting studies. J Biochem (Tokyo) 2004; 135: 653–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Hayashi M, Kim SW, Imanaka-Yoshida K, et al. Targeted deletion of BMK1/ERK5 in adult mice perturbs vascular integrity and leads to endothelial failure. J Clin Invest 2004; 113: 1138–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Regan CP, Li W, Boucher DM, Spatz S, Su MS, Kuida K. Erk5 null mice display multiple extraembryonic vascular and embryonic cardiovascular defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 9248–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Sohn SJ, Sarvis BK, Cado D, Winoto A. ERK5 MAPK regulates embryonic angiogenesis and acts as a hypoxia-sensitive repressor of vascular endothelial growth factor expression. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 43344–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Yan L, Carr J, Ashby PR, Murry-Tait V, Thompson C, Arthur JS. Knockout of ERK5 causes multiple defects in placental and embryonic development. BMC Dev Biol 2003; 3: 11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Garcea G, Lloy TD, Gescher A, Dennison AR, Steward WP, Berry DP. Angiogenesis of gastrointestinal tumours and their metastases—a target for intervention. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 1302–13.
  7. ↵
    Tonini T, Rossi F, Claudio PP. Molecular basis of angiogenesis and cancer. Oncogene 2003; 22: 6549–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. Roux PP, Richards SA, Blenis J. Phosphorylation of p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) regulates extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking and RSK activity. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23: 4796–804.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Kato Y, Kravchenko VV, Tapping RI, Han J, Ulevitch RJ, Lee JD. BMK1/ERK5 regulates serum-induced early gene expression through transcription factor MEF2C. EMBO J 1997; 16: 7054–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. ↵
    Penault-Llorca F, Bertucci F, Adelaide J, et al. Expression of FGF and FGF receptor genes in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1995; 61: 170–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. Yamanaka Y, Friess H, Buchler M, et al. Overexpression of acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors in human pancreatic cancer correlates with advanced tumor stage. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 5289–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Shou Y, Hirano T, Gong Y, et al. Influence of angiogenetic factors and matrix metalloproteinases upon tumour progression in non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 1706–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Lazar-Molnar E, Hegyesi H, Toth S, Falus A. Autocrine and paracrine regulation by cytokines and growth factors in melanoma. Cytokine 2000; 12: 547–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Dufner A, Thomas G. Ribosomal S6 kinase signaling and the control of translation. Exp Cell Res 1999; 253: 100–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Roux PP, Blenis J. ERK and p38 MAPK-activated protein kinases: a family of protein kinases with diverse biological functions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004; 68: 320–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Esparis-Ogando A, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Montero JC, Yuste L, Crespo P, Pandiella A. Erk5 participates in neuregulin signal transduction and is constitutively active in breast cancer cells overexpressing ErbB2. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 270–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. English JM, Pearson G, Hockenberry T, Shivakumar L, White MA, Cobb MH. Contribution of the ERK5/MEK5 pathway to Ras/Raf signaling and growth control. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 31588–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Weldon CB, Scandurro AB, Rolfe KW, et al. Identification of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase as a chemoresistant pathway in MCF-7 cells by using gene expression microarray. Surgery 2002; 132: 293–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Mehta PB, Jenkins BL, McCarthy L, et al. MEK5 overexpression is associated with metastatic prostate cancer, and stimulates proliferation, MMP-9 expression and invasion. Oncogene 2003; 22: 1381–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Sebolt-Leopold JS, Dudley DT, Herrera R, et al. Blockade of the MAP kinase pathway suppresses growth of colon tumors in vivo. Nat Med 1999; 5: 810–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Kramer BW, Gotz R, Rapp UR. Use of mitogenic cascade blockers for treatment of C-Raf induced lung adenoma in vivo: CI-1040 strongly reduces growth and improves lung structure. BMC Cancer 2004; 4: 24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Dancey J, Sausville EA. Issues and progress with protein kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003; 2: 296–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Pardee AB. G1 events and regulation of cell proliferation. Science 1989; 246: 603–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Brown EJ, Schreiber SL. A signaling pathway to translational control. Cell 1996; 86: 517–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Volarevic S, Thomas G. Role of S6 phosphorylation and S6 kinase in cell growth. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 2001; 65: 101–27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Ferrari S, Bandi HR, Hofsteenge J, Bussian BM, Thomas G. Mitogen-activated 70K S6 kinase. Identification of in vitro 40 S ribosomal S6 phosphorylation sites. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 22770–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. Gout I, Minami T, Hara K, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel p70 S6 kinase, p70 S6 kinase β containing a proline-rich region. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 30061–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. Saitoh M, ten Dijke P, Miyazono K, Ichijo H. Cloning and characterization of p70(S6K β) defines a novel family of p70 S6 kinases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 253: 470–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Shima H, Pende M, Chen Y, Fumagalli S, Thomas G, Kozma SC. Disruption of the p70(s6k)/p85(s6k) gene reveals a small mouse phenotype and a new functional S6 kinase. EMBO J 1998; 17: 6649–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Wettenhall RE, Erikson E, Maller JL. Ordered multisite phosphorylation of Xenopus ribosomal protein S6 by S6 kinase II. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 9021–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Pende M, Um SH, Mieulet V, et al. S6K1(−/−) /S6K2(−/−) mice exhibit perinatal lethality and rapamycin-sensitive 5′-terminal oligopyrimidine mRNA translation and reveal a mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent S6 kinase pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 3112–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Schwab MS, Kim SH, Terada N, et al. p70(S6K) controls selective mRNA translation during oocyte maturation and early embryogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19: 2485–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Gavin AC, Schorderet-Slatkine S. Ribosomal S6 kinase p90rsk and mRNA cap-binding protein eIF4E phosphorylations correlate with MAP kinase activation during meiotic reinitiation of mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 46: 383–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Volarevic S, Stewart MJ, Ledermann B, et al. Proliferation, but not growth, blocked by conditional deletion of 40S ribosomal protein S6. Science 2000; 288: 2045–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Kerbel R, Folkman J. Clinical translation of angiogenesis inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 727–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Hayashi M, Lee JD. Role of the BMK1/ERK5 signaling pathway: lessons from knockout mice. J Mol Med 2004; 82: 800–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 65 (17)
September 2005
Volume 65, Issue 17
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Big Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Signaling Pathway Is Essential for Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Big Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Signaling Pathway Is Essential for Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis
Masaaki Hayashi, Colleen Fearns, Brian Eliceiri, Young Yang and Jiing-Dwan Lee
Cancer Res September 1 2005 (65) (17) 7699-7706; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4540

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Big Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Signaling Pathway Is Essential for Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis
Masaaki Hayashi, Colleen Fearns, Brian Eliceiri, Young Yang and Jiing-Dwan Lee
Cancer Res September 1 2005 (65) (17) 7699-7706; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4540
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • γ-Aminobutyric Acid Inhibits Cholangiocarcinoma Growth by Cyclic AMP–Dependent Regulation of the Protein Kinase A/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Pathway
  • The G691S RET Polymorphism Increases Glial Cell Line–Derived Neurotrophic Factor–Induced Pancreatic Cancer Cell Invasion by Amplifying Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling
  • Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Sensitizes Human Colon Carcinoma Cells to TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis through Clustering of DR5 and Concentrating Death-Inducing Signaling Complex Components into Ceramide-Enriched Caveolae
Show more Cell and Tumor Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement