Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology

Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia Derives from the Selective Death of Megakaryocyte Progenitors and Can Be Rescued by Stem Cell Factor

Ann Zeuner, Michele Signore, Daniela Martinetti, Monica Bartucci, Cesare Peschle and Ruggero De Maria
Ann Zeuner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Signore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Martinetti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monica Bartucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cesare Peschle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruggero De Maria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4303 Published May 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Thrombocytopenia is a common side effect of chemotherapy, responsible for increased risk of bleeding and delay of treatment schedules in cancer patients. It is currently unknown how chemotherapeutic agents affect platelet production and whether the platelet precursors megakaryocytes represent a direct target of cytotoxic drugs. We investigated the effects of chemotherapeutic agents on primary megakaryocytes by using a culture system that recapitulates in vitro human megakaryopoiesis and found that cytotoxic drugs predominantly destroyed megakaryocytic progenitors at early stages of differentiation. Immature megakaryocytes could be protected from chemotherapeutic agents by the cytokine stem cell factor (SCF), which binds the c-kit receptor expressed on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. In chemotherapy-treated megakaryocytes, SCF activated Akt, neutralized the mitochondrial apoptotic machinery, and inhibited caspase activity. Interfering with Akt activation abrogated the antiapoptotic effects of SCF, whereas exogenous expression of constitutively active Akt inhibited drug-induced apoptosis of primary megakaryocytes, indicating the Akt pathway as primarily responsible for SCF-mediated protection of megakaryocyte progenitors. These results indicate apoptosis of megakaryocyte progenitors as a major cause of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and suggest that SCF may be used to prevent platelet loss in cancer patients with c-kit–negative tumors. [Cancer Res 2007;67(10):4767–4773]

  • Apoptosis
  • Survival factors
  • Chemotherapy
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Cytokines

Introduction

Thrombocytopenia is a detrimental side effect of cancer treatment, often resulting in chemotherapy dose reductions, schedule alterations, or the need for platelet transfusions. Although more frequent in leukemia patients, drug-induced thrombocytopenia and consequent bleeding episodes occur also in patients with solid tumors, where they are associated with increased morbidity and occasional mortality ( 1, 2). Despite the clinical importance of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, its causes are still unclear, thus considerably limiting the possibility to develop effective remedies. In particular, the effects of chemotherapeutic agents on the platelet precursors megakaryocytes have not been investigated in detail, leaving open the possibility that drug-induced toxicity on this cell population may represent a major cause of thrombocytopenia in cancer patients.

Megakaryopoiesis is a peculiar process that involves the gradual differentiation of immature megakaryocyte progenitors into diploid megakaryocytes, which undergo a progressive polyploidization and a subsequent process of cytoplasmic maturation leading to platelet release in the bone marrow sinusoids. Platelet formation and release involve a reorganization of the cytoskeleton that has recently been shown to rely on the compartmentalized activation of caspases ( 3). Caspase activation in megakaryocytes has been shown to occur also as part of the apoptotic program, which can be initiated either by cytotoxic agents or by activation of death receptors expressed on the surface of megakaryocytic precursors ( 3, 4). Megakaryocyte survival, proliferation, and differentiation are coordinated by combinations of cytokines and mediators present within specialized bone marrow niches ( 5). Besides thrombopoietin (TPO), which is the essential growth factor responsible for platelet production, several hematopoietic growth factors such as interleukin (IL)-3, IL-6, IL-11, stromal cell–derived factor 1, and stem cell factor (SCF) have been shown to influence megakaryopoiesis at different developmental stages ( 6– 8). SCF, the ligand for the c-kit tyrosine kinase receptor, has recently been shown to play an important role in megakaryopoiesis, as mice with a double inactivation of TPO receptor and c-kit (c-Mpl−/−KitWv/Wv) display lower levels of bone marrow megakaryocyte progenitors than c-Mpl−/− mice ( 9).

To investigate the basis of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, we analyzed the sensitivity to drug-induced cytotoxicity of primary human megakaryocytes at different maturation stages and explored the possibility to protect megakaryocytic progenitors from drug-induced apoptosis with the use of cytokines. We also investigated the molecular events activated during chemotherapy-induced apoptosis of megakaryocyte progenitors and during cytokine-mediated protection from cell death. These studies may help understand the causes of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and may support the development of therapeutic strategies to prevent platelet depletion in cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Cytokines, antibodies, and chemicals. Human recombinant SCF and TPO were purchased from PeproTech, Inc. Anti-tubulin antibody and chemotherapeutic drugs were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. Anti–Bcl-2 and anti–cytochrome c antibodies were from BD PharMingen. Anti–Bcl-XL (H5), anti-Akt (C20), anti-Bad (H-168), anti–extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)-1 (K-23), anti–phospho-ERK1-2 (E-4), and anti–Mcl-1 (S-19) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti–phospho-Bad (Ser136) and anti–phospho-Akt (Ser473) were purchased from Cell Signaling. Anti-hemagglutinin (HA) antibody was from Babco. Anti–c-kit (AF332) was from R&D Systems. Annexin V-FITC, MitoTracker Red CMXRos, TOTO-3, antimouse Alexa Fluor 488, antirabbit Alexa Fluor 488, and antimouse Alexa Fluor 633 were purchased from Invitrogen-Molecular Probes. Antirabbit Texas red and antimouse Texas red were from The Jackson Laboratory. LY294002 was from Sigma-Aldrich and U0126 from Promega.

Adult peripheral blood human progenitor cell purification and culture. Adult peripheral blood was obtained from male donors after their informed consent and approval by the institutional Committee for Human Studies. Human CD34+ precursor cells were purified from peripheral blood by using the midi-MACS immunomagnetic separation system (Miltenyi Biotec). CD34+ cells were cultured in serum-free medium prepared as previously described ( 10) and supplemented with 100 ng/mL TPO (from now on indicated as standard megakaryocyte medium) to induce unilineage megakaryocytic differentiation. In these conditions, a progeny of cells 97% to 99% CD61+/CD41+ is generated ( 11). The differentiation stage of megakaryocytes was routinely evaluated by May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining and cytologic analysis. Stained cells were observed through a Nikon Eclipse E1000 transmitted light right microscope equipped with PlanFluor 40× dry and oil objectives (numerical apertures, 0.75 and 1.3, respectively) and with PlanApo 60× and 100× oil objectives (numerical aperture, 1.4 for both). All objectives were from Nikon. Images were subsequently taken by using a Nikon DXM1200 RGB camera and the Nikon ACT-1 software.

Western blotting. For detection of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Bad, and Akt, protein extracts were prepared by resuspending cell pellets in 1% NP40 lysis buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), 200 mmol/L NaCl, 1% NP40] supplemented with Protease Inhibitor Cocktail and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktails I and II (all from Sigma-Aldrich). For phospho-Bad detection, protein extracts were passed trough a 26-gauge (0.45 × 10 mm) syringe needle, loaded on a 15% polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane with 0.05-μm pores. Samples were analyzed by standard immunoblot procedure and visualized by chemiluminescence (SuperSignal West Pico, Pierce). The intensity of bands representing relevant proteins was quantified using Scion Image (Scion Corp.).

Production of retroviral particles and transduction of hematopoietic progenitor cells. HA-myr-Akt cDNA was cloned into a third-generation lentiviral vector pRRL-CMV-PGK-GFP-WPRE called Tween ( 12). Lentiviral supernatants were produced by calcium phosphate transient cotransfection of a three-plasmid expression system in the packaging human embryonic kidney cell line 293T. One cycle of infection with viral supernatant (with addition of 4 μg/mL polybrene and 100 ng/mL TPO) was done on megakaryocytes at day 3 of unilineage culture, and green fluorescent protein (GFP)–positive cells were separated by flow cytometry using a FACS-Vantage (Becton Dickinson).

Evaluation of caspase activity and apoptosis. Caspase-3/caspase-7 activity in megakaryocyte progenitors stimulated with chemotherapeutic drugs was determined with the Apo-ONE Homogeneous Caspase-3/7 Assay (Promega) based on cleavage of the z-DEVD-Rhodamine 110 substrate. Fluorescence values were read on a Victor 2 plate fluorometer (Wallac, Perkin-Elmer, Inc.) at a wavelength of 485/535 nm (excitation/emission). Apoptosis was assessed by ethidium bromide/acridine orange staining and fluorescence microscopy, by staining with Annexin V-FITC, by terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining (described below), or with the CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Assay (Promega).

Immunostaining and TUNEL staining. For immunofluorescence experiments with anti–cytochrome c and anti-Bad, megakaryocytes were preloaded with 100 nmol/L MitoTracker CMXRos (30 min in culture medium at 37°C), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with blocking buffer (0.05% saponin, 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS), and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary and secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 antimouse immunoglobulin G for cytochrome c and Alexa Fluor 488 antirabbit IgG for Bad). For immunofluorescence experiments with anti-Akt, anti–phospho-Akt, and anti-HA, cells were cytocentrifuged on glass slides, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with methanol at −20°C, and stained with primary and secondary antibodies (antigoat Alexa Fluor 633 for anti-Akt, antirabbit Texas red for anti–phospho-Akt, and antimouse Texas red for anti-HA). Slides were mounted using the LowFade Light Anti Fade Kit from Invitrogen-Molecular Probes. TUNEL staining was done with the In Situ Cell Death Detection kit conjugated with FITC (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) on megakaryocytes fixed and cytospun on glass slides. In immunofluorescence and TUNEL experiments done on lentivirally transduced cells, detergent-based permeabilization resulted in GFP extraction. Consequently, GFP fluorescence became undetectable and cells could be stained with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated secondary antibodies or TUNEL FITC. Fluorescence images were taken by means of an Olympus FV-500 laser scanning confocal inverted microscope equipped with Argon ions, Green and Red Helium-Neon lasers, and with PlanApo 40× dry, 60×, and 100× oil Olympus objectives (numerical apertures, 0.85, 1.4, and 1.35, respectively). Emission at different wavelengths was collected using the proper filters and overriding signal was subtracted. Digital zooming was applied where specified. Images were assembled with the Canvas 8 software (Deneba Systems, Inc.).

Statistical analysis. The statistical significance of the results shown in Figs. 2A, B, 3B-D, and 4B was evaluated by means of two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttests. Single asterisk represents P < 0.05, double asterisk indicates P < 0.01, and three asterisks indicates P < 0.001. All statistical analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 4. 3

Results

Megakaryocyte progenitors are the preferential target of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Purified CD34+ cells isolated from peripheral blood and cultivated in serum-free medium in the presence of TPO undergo unconditional megakaryocytic differentiation, reproducing in vitro all the stages of megakaryopoiesis ( Fig. 1A ; ref. 11). We used this unilineage culture system to investigate the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs of the different stages of megakaryocytic maturation. To do so, we evaluated the extent of drug-induced apoptosis in CD34+ cells, megakaryocytic progenitors (megakaryoblasts and promegakaryocytes), and immature (binucleated) and mature (multinucleated) megakaryocytes. Three chemotherapeutic drugs, cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, and vincristine, were chosen because they can cause thrombocytopenia in treated cancer patients. The apoptotic rate of megakaryocytic progenitors treated with the three chemotherapeutic agents was significantly higher compared with that of CD34+ cells and polyploid megakaryocytes ( Fig. 1B), pointing to a higher sensitivity of the early stages of megakaryopoiesis to drug-induced cytotoxicity.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

In vitro megakaryocyte differentiation and chemosensitivity. A, highly purified populations of megakaryocyte progenitors were obtained by unilineage culture of peripheral blood CD34+ cells. At the indicated days of differentiation, cells were cytospun on glass slides and stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa. Original magnification, ×600. B, CD34+ undifferentiated progenitors and megakaryocytes at day 6 or day 12 of unilineage culture were incubated for 24 h in standard megakaryocyte medium (Con) with 80 μmol/L cytosine arabinoside (AraC), 0.5 μmol/L vincristine (Vin), or 5 μg/mL cisplatin (Cis). Cell death was assessed by counting cells under a fluorescence microscope after ethidium bromide/acridine orange staining and expressed as the percentage of dead cells of each differentiation stage over the percentage of dead cells in the sample. Day 6 megakaryocytic cultures were used to evaluate cell death of megakaryoblasts (MK Blasts) and promegakaryocytes (Pro MK) whereas immature (binucleated) and mature (multinucleated) megakaryocytes were evaluated from day 12 cultures. B, columns, mean of four independent experiments done with cells from different donors; bars, SD.

SCF but not TPO protects immature megakaryocytes from drug-induced apoptosis. Because chemotherapeutic agents seemed to preferentially target the earlier forms of megakaryocytic maturation, we did subsequent studies on cells at day 6 of unilineage culture, which contain mostly megakaryoblasts and promegakaryocytes (as evaluated by morphologic features of cell size, cytoplasm abundance, and nucleus/cytoplasm ratio). To investigate whether drug-induced apoptosis of megakaryocytic progenitor population could be inhibited with the use of cytokines, we analyzed the antiapoptotic properties of TPO, the major megakaryocytic growth factor, and of SCF, which is a potent antiapoptotic factor for primary hematopoietic cells. Day 6 megakaryocytes were exposed to chemotherapeutic drugs in serum-free, cytokine-free medium in the presence or absence of TPO. However, no significant difference was observed in the amount of cell death induced by chemotherapeutic agents in either condition ( Fig. 2A ). Differently, the presence of SCF in the megakaryocyte culture medium strongly increased the survival of megakaryocytic progenitors treated with chemotherapeutic agents ( Fig. 2B). Flow cytometric analysis of cells at day 6 of unilineage culture showed that the presence of SCF inhibited drug-induced phosphatidylserine externalization ( Fig. 2C), whereas TUNEL staining showed that SCF reduced the amount of damaged DNA in cells treated with chemotherapeutic agents ( Fig. 2D). Some tumor types express cytokine receptors and may respond to hematopoietic growth factors with increased proliferation and survival. However, we did not observe c-kit expression or any antiapoptotic effect of SCF in primary breast cancer cells (Supplementary Fig. S1), suggesting that, in principle, SCF could be safely administered to patients with c-kit–negative tumors.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

SCF but not TPO protects megakaryocyte progenitors from death induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. A, megakaryocytes at day 6 of unilineage culture were treated with chemotherapeutic agents as in Fig. 1 in serum-free medium in the presence (+TPO) or absence (−TPO) of 100 ng/mL TPO. The difference between −TPO and +TPO samples treated with chemotherapeutic agents was not statistically significant. B, megakaryocytes at day 6 of unilineage culture were treated with chemotherapeutic agents as above in standard megakaryocyte medium. Where indicated (+SCF), cells were preincubated with 100 ng/mL SCF for 8 h and kept in the presence of SCF during treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs. Columns, mean of four independent experiments done with cells from different donors; bars, SD. P < 0.01, ANOVA. C, megakaryocytes at day 6 of unilineage culture were treated for 24 h with 5 μg/mL cisplatin in standard megakaryocyte medium alone (−SCF) or with 100 ng/mL SCF (+SCF) added 8 h before the chemotherapeutic agent. Cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and analyzed on a cytofluorometer. D, megakaryocytes at day 6 of unilineage culture were treated for 24 h with 0.5 μmol/L vincristine in standard megakaryocyte medium alone (−SCF) or with 100 ng/mL SCF (+SCF) added 8 h before the chemotherapeutic agent. Staining was done with TUNEL FITC to identify apoptotic cells and with the red nuclear dye TOTO-3 (pseudocolored in blue). Cells were analyzed on an epifluorescence microscope (original magnification, ×200).

SCF activates Akt and inhibits the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in immature megakaryocytes. We have previously shown that SCF protects primary erythroid progenitor cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis through the up-regulation of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members ( 13). Differently, we found that SCF treatment did not alter the expression levels of either Bcl-2 or Bcl-XL in megakaryocyte progenitors ( Fig. 3A ), indicating that the SCF receptor c-kit exploits different antiapoptotic signaling pathways in progenitors belonging to different hematopoietic lineages. To identify the pathways involved in SCF-mediated protection of megakaryocyte progenitors, we analyzed the activation of two major mediators of c-kit signaling involved in cell survival, Akt and ERK kinases. Treatment of day 6 megakaryocytic cultures with SCF resulted in a strong Akt activation and consequent phosphorylation of proapoptotic Bad on Ser136 ( Fig. 3A), which results in Bad inactivation and apoptosis inhibition. Conversely, SCF treatment resulted only in a modest activation of ERK kinases and did not modify the levels of Mcl-1, an important antiapoptotic mediator controlled by both the Akt and ERK pathways (ref. 14; Fig. 3A). To confirm the preferential involvement of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway in megakaryoblast protection, we treated megakaryocytic cultures with vincristine and SCF in the presence of inhibitors of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ERK pathways. Inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway abrogated the protective effect of SCF, whereas inhibitors of the ERK pathway interfered marginally with SCF-mediated protection of megakaryoblasts ( Fig. 3B). Mitochondria release cytochrome c in response to most anticancer drugs, resulting in apoptosome formation and subsequent activation of executioner caspases ( 15). We analyzed the localization of cytochrome c in immature megakaryocytes treated with anticancer drugs in the presence or absence of SCF and found that cytochrome c was sequestered in the mitochondria in untreated cells, released in the cytoplasm on drug treatment, and again retained in the mitochondria in the presence of SCF ( Fig. 3C). As the presence of cytochrome c in the cytoplasm is essential for activation of executioner caspases, we evaluated the activation of caspase-3/caspase-7 induced by chemotherapeutic drugs in megakaryocyte progenitors and found that the levels of caspase activation were significantly lower in megakaryocyte progenitors treated with chemotherapeutic drugs in the presence of SCF ( Fig. 3D). These observations suggest that SCF-mediated megakaryocyte protection primarily relies on Akt activation and inhibition of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

SCF inhibits apoptosis through Akt activation and inhibition of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in megakaryocyte progenitors. A, megakaryocyte progenitors at day 6 of unilineage culture were treated for 8 h with (+SCF) or without (−SCF) 100 ng/mL SCF in standard megakaryocyte medium and then analyzed by Western blotting for protein expression. Top, Western blot results of three independent experiments are expressed as fold increase in protein expression as compared with untreated (−SCF) controls. B, day 6 megakaryocyte progenitors untreated or treated with SCF as above were incubated with 0.5 μmol/L vincristine in the presence or absence of 25 μmol/L LY294002 or 10 μmol/L U0126 (both administered 1 h before the chemotherapeutic agent). Cell death was assessed 16 h later by ethidium bromide/acridine orange staining. Columns, mean of three independent experiments; bars, SD. C, immunofluorescence analysis of cytochrome c localization in megakaryocyte progenitors treated with 0.5 μmol/L vincristine, preloaded with MitoTracker CMXRos, and stained with anti–cytochrome c antibody. Original magnification, ×1,000, 3× zoom. D, caspase-3/caspase-7 activation in megakaryocyte progenitors kept in the presence (+SCF) or absence (−SCF) of SCF as indicated above and incubated for 24 h with 80 μmol/L cytosine arabinoside, 0.5 μmol/L vincristine, or 5 μg/mL cisplatin. Columns, mean fold increase of caspase activity of three independent experiments done with cells from different donors, as compared with an untreated cell sample; bars, SD. P < 0.001, ANOVA.

Akt activation protects megakaryocyte progenitors from drug-induced apoptosis. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating several components of the intrinsic cell death machinery. To address whether the antiapoptotic effect of SCF in megakaryocyte progenitors could be ascribed to Akt activation, we retrovirally transduced a myristylated constitutively active form of Akt (myr-Akt) in immature megakaryocytes derived from CD34+ cells. Transduced cells were then sorted on the basis of GFP expression and the presence of phosphorylated HA-tagged Akt was confirmed by immunostaining ( Fig. 4A ). Megakaryocyte progenitors transduced with myr-Akt were then exposed to chemotherapeutic agents and the extent of cell death was assessed together with cytochrome c localization. The expression of myr-Akt rendered immature megakaryocytic cells significantly more resistant to apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic agents ( Fig. 4B and C). Moreover, the presence of myr-Akt in drug-treated megakaryocyte progenitors resulted in retention of cytochrome c in the mitochondria ( Fig. 4D), thus explaining the increased survival observed in this cell population. Altogether, these results indicate that Akt activation protects megakaryocyte progenitors from apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic drugs and suggest that Akt phosphorylation mediated by SCF may be responsible for megakaryocyte resistance to the cytotoxic action of chemotherapeutic drugs.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Constitutively active Akt protects megakaryocyte progenitors from drug-induced apoptosis. Megakaryocyte progenitors at day 3 of unilineage culture were transduced with a lentiviral vector carrying a myristylated constitutively active form of Akt and GFP as a reporter, sorted on the basis of GFP expression, and analyzed after 3 additional days of culture. A, megakaryocyte progenitors transduced with the empty vector (Vector) or with myr-Akt (myrAkt) were immunostained with anti-Akt (αAKT; left), anti–phospho-Akt (αpAKT; center), or anti-HA (αHA; right). Original magnification, ×400. B, cells transduced with the empty vector or with myr-Akt were left untreated (Con) or treated with chemotherapeutic agents as in (C). Cell death percentage was evaluated by ethidium bromide-acridine orange staining. Columns, mean of three experiments done with cells from different donors; bars, SD. P < 0.001, ANOVA. C, transduced megakaryocyte progenitors were treated with 80 μmol/L cytosine arabinoside for 24 h, stained with TOTO-3 and TUNEL FITC (pseudocolored in blue and magenta, respectively), and analyzed on a confocal microscope (original magnification, ×400, 2× zoom). D, transduced megakaryocytes were treated with cytosine arabinoside, preloaded with MitoTracker CMXRos, and stained with anti–cytochrome c. Samples were analyzed on a confocal microscope (original magnification, ×1,000, 3× zoom).

Discussion

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is a major clinical problem that, on estimate, affects 300,000 persons yearly worldwide ( 1). Management approaches to chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia are mainly based on platelet transfusions that, however, are associated with transfusion-transmitted disease, infection, refractoriness, and alloimmunization. Over the past decade, several pharmacologic agents with thrombopoietic activity have been evaluated for the supportive therapy of cancer patients including TPO, IL-3, IL-6, and IL-11 ( 16, 17). At present, IL-11 is the only cytokine licensed in the United States for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, but its thrombopoietic activity is modest and its use is often associated with unfavorable side effects ( 17, 18). The administration of hematopoietic growth factors after chemotherapy offers a faster recovery from myelosuppression in patients with solid tumors. However, an important goal of anticancer therapies would be to avoid the occurrence of myelosuppression either through more selective therapeutic strategies that target only neoplastic cells ( 19) or through the use of antiapoptotic factors that specifically protect hematopoietic cells. The results presented in this study indicate that SCF is a potent antiapoptotic factor for megakaryoblasts, which are the preferential target of chemotherapeutic drugs among maturing megakaryocytic cells, and therefore may be useful in the prevention of drug-induced thrombocytopenia.

A potential use of SCF to prevent chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia is supported by the complete hematologic recovery and increased platelet counts observed in a cancer patient treated with recombinant SCF (Ancestim, Amgen) in combination with other hematopoietic growth factors ( 20). In this case, the use of SCF was associated with a particularly fast platelet recovery, possibly due to the protection of early megakaryocytic progenitors from drug-induced depletion. Our findings that SCF protects megakaryocyte progenitors from apoptosis by inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptotic machinery suggest that SCF would be mostly effective if administered simultaneously with the chemotherapeutic treatment and during all the duration of the chemotherapy cycle to prevent the occurrence of drug-induced apoptotic events.

The ability of SCF to protect megakaryocytic progenitors from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis reveals a link between c-kit signaling and thrombocytopenia that may influence the extent of megakaryocyte loss during chemotherapy. According to this hypothesis, pharmacologic agents that inhibit c-kit, such as imatinib mesylate, frequently produce megakaryocyte loss and thrombocytopenia in treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients ( 21, 22). Thrombocytopenia is particularly evident when imatinib is combined with standard chemotherapeutic drugs ( 23), suggesting that the interaction between c-kit and endogenously produced SCF is important for megakaryocyte survival in myelosuppressive conditions.

A prospective use of SCF to support hematopoietic protection and recovery in cancer patients should take into account the potential oncogenic effects of this cytokine on c-kit–expressing tumor cells. In fact, some tumor cells, particularly from acute leukemias and colon and gastric cancers, have been shown to express c-kit, and some of these tumors respond to SCF with enhanced proliferation ( 24– 26). The potential oncogenic effect of cytokines used in the supportive therapy of cancer patients is a general problem, as shown by the recent discovery that many tumors express the erythropoietin receptor and respond to recombinant erythropoietin with proliferation and chemotherapy resistance ( 27– 31). 4 Therefore, to avoid undesirable proliferative and antiapoptotic effects on tumor cells, SCF should be administered exclusively to patients with c-kit–negative tumors. A recent comprehensive study on c-kit expression in human tumors showed that 81 of 120 tumor types examined were negative for c-kit expression including hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, medulloblastoma, tubular breast carcinoma, and chronic myelogenous leukemia ( 32), whereas other investigators reported a complete absence of c-kit expression in malignant brain tumors and breast and ovarian cancers ( 33). Although an individual evaluation of receptor expression on cancer cells would be desirable before the administration of any hematopoietic cytokine, these observations suggest that the use of SCF should be safe in many common malignancies.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), the Italian Health Ministry, and an AIRC fellowship (M. Bartucci).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Stefano Guida and Giusy Ruscio for technical assistance and Desirèe Bonci (Department of Hematology, Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy) for providing the Tween vector.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • M. Signore and D. Martinetti contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵3 http://www.graphpad.com

  • ↵4 Our unpublished data.

  • Received November 22, 2006.
  • Revision received February 22, 2007.
  • Accepted March 15, 2007.
  • ©2007 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Kaushansky K. The thrombocytopenia of cancer. Prospects for effective cytokine therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1996; 10: 431–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Elting LS, Rubenstein EB, Martin CG, et al. Incidence, cost, and outcomes of bleeding and chemotherapy dose modification among solid tumor patients with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1137–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    De Botton S, Sabri S, Daugas E, et al. Platelet formation is the consequence of caspase activation within megakaryocytes. Blood 2002; 100: 1310–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    De Maria R, Zeuner A, Eramo A, et al. Negative regulation of erythropoiesis by caspase-mediated cleavage of GATA-1. Nature 1999; 401: 489–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Avecilla ST, Hattori K, Heissig B, et al. Chemokine-mediated interaction of hematopoietic progenitors with the bone marrow vascular niche is required for thrombopoiesis. Nat Med 2004; 10: 64–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Debili N, Masse JM, Katz A, et al. Effects of the recombinant hematopoietic growth factors interleukin-3, interleukin-6, stem cell factor, and leukemia inhibitory factor on the megakaryocytic differentiation of CD34+ cells. Blood 1993; 82: 84–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. Norol F, Vitrat N, Cramer E, et al. Effects of cytokines on platelet production from blood and marrow CD34+ cells. Blood 1998; 91: 830–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Guerriero R, Mattia G, Testa U, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor 1α increases polyploidization of megakaryocytes generated by human hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 2001; 97: 2587–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Antonchuk J, Hyland CD, Hilton DJ, Alexander WS. Synergistic effects on erythropoiesis, thrombopoiesis, and stem cell competitiveness in mice deficient in thrombopoietin and steel factor receptors. Blood 2004; 104: 1306–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Zeuner A, Pedini F, Signore M, et al. Increased death receptor resistance and FLIPshort expression in polycythemia vera erythroid precursor cells. Blood 2006; 107: 3495–502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Guerriero R, Testa U, Gabbianelli M, et al. Unilineage megakaryocytic proliferation and differentiation of purified hematopoietic progenitors in serum-free liquid culture. Blood 1995; 86: 3725–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Bonci D, Cittadini A, Latronico MV, et al. “Advanced” generation lentiviruses as efficient vectors for cardiomyocyte gene transduction in vitro and in vivo. Gene Ther 2003; 10: 630–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Zeuner A, Pedini F, Signore M, et al. Stem cell factor protects erythroid precursor cells from chemotherapeutic agents via up-regulation of BCL-2 family proteins. Blood 2003; 102: 87–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Schubert KM, Duronio V. Distinct roles for extracellular-signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) mitogen-activated protein kinases and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in the regulation of Mcl-1 synthesis. Biochem J 2001; 356: 473–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Herr I, Debatin KM. Cellular stress response and apoptosis in cancer therapy. Blood 2001; 98: 2603–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Maslak P, Nimer SD. The efficacy of IL-3, SCF, IL-6, and IL-11 in treating thrombocytopenia. Semin Hematol 1998; 35: 253–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Kuter DJ, Begley CG. Recombinant human thrombopoietin: basic biology and evaluation of clinical studies. Blood 2002; 100: 3457–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Demetri GD. Pharmacologic treatment options in patients with thrombocytopenia. Semin Hematol 2000; 37: 11–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Blagosklonny MV, Pardee AB. Exploiting cancer cell cycling for selective protection of normal cells. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 4301–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Blaise D, Faucher C, Vey N, et al. Rescue of haemopoiesis by a combination of growth factors including stem-cell factor. Lancet 2000; 356: 1325–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Druker BJ, Sawyers CL, Kantarjian H, et al. Activity of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in the blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Philadelphia chromosome. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1038–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    van Deventer HW, Hall MD, Orlowski RZ, et al. Clinical course of thrombocytopenia in patients treated with imatinib mesylate for accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Am J Hematol 2002; 71: 184–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Gardembas M, Rousselot P, Tulliez M, et al. Results of a prospective phase 2 study combining imatinib mesylate and cytarabine for the treatment of Philadelphia-positive patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Blood 2003; 102: 4298–305.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Ikeda H, Kanakura Y, Tamaki T, et al. Expression and functional role of the proto-oncogene c-kit in acute myeloblastic leukemia cells. Blood 1991; 78: 2962–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. Bellone G, Carbone A, Sibona N, et al. Aberrant activation of c-kit protects colon carcinoma cells against apoptosis and enhances their invasive potential. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 2200–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Broudy VC, Smith FO, Lin N, et al. Blasts from patients with acute myelogenous leukemia express functional receptors for stem cell factor. Blood 1992; 80: 60–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Dagnon K, Pacary E, Commo F, et al. Expression of erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in non-small cell lung carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 993–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. Arcasoy MO, Amin K, Karayal AF, et al. Functional significance of erythropoietin receptor expression in breast cancer. Lab Invest 2002; 82: 911–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. Arcasoy MO, Amin K, Chou SC, et al. Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor expression in head and neck cancer: relationship to tumor hypoxia. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 20–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. Acs G, Xu X, Chu C, Acs P, Verma A. Prognostic significance of erythropoietin expression in human endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100: 2376–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Batra S, Perelman N, Luck LR, Shimada H, Malik P. Pediatric tumor cells express erythropoietin and a functional erythropoietin receptor that promotes angiogenesis and tumor cell survival. Lab Invest 2003; 83: 1477–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Went PT, Dirnhofer S, Bundi M, et al. Prevalence of KIT expression in human tumors. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4514–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Singer CF, Hudelist G, Lamm W, et al. Expression of tyrosine kinases in human malignancies as potential targets for kinase-specific inhibitors. Endocr Relat Cancer 2004; 11: 861–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 67 (10)
May 2007
Volume 67, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia Derives from the Selective Death of Megakaryocyte Progenitors and Can Be Rescued by Stem Cell Factor
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia Derives from the Selective Death of Megakaryocyte Progenitors and Can Be Rescued by Stem Cell Factor
Ann Zeuner, Michele Signore, Daniela Martinetti, Monica Bartucci, Cesare Peschle and Ruggero De Maria
Cancer Res May 15 2007 (67) (10) 4767-4773; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4303

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chemotherapy-Induced Thrombocytopenia Derives from the Selective Death of Megakaryocyte Progenitors and Can Be Rescued by Stem Cell Factor
Ann Zeuner, Michele Signore, Daniela Martinetti, Monica Bartucci, Cesare Peschle and Ruggero De Maria
Cancer Res May 15 2007 (67) (10) 4767-4773; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4303
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Diversity in Proadhesive Signaling Mechanisms in B-CLL Lymphocytes
  • Role of ATM Phosphorylation in Exon 11 of BRCA1
  • Methylated Genes in TGF-β Signaling in HNSCC
Show more Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement