Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Enhanced Spontaneous and Benzo(a)pyrene-Induced Mutations in the Lung of Nrf2-Deficient gpt Delta Mice

Yasunobu Aoki, Akiko H. Hashimoto, Kimiko Amanuma, Michi Matsumoto, Kyoko Hiyoshi, Hirohisa Takano, Ken-ichi Masumura, Ken Itoh, Takehiko Nohmi and Masayuki Yamamoto
Yasunobu Aoki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiko H. Hashimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimiko Amanuma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michi Matsumoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyoko Hiyoshi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hirohisa Takano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken-ichi Masumura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Itoh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takehiko Nohmi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masayuki Yamamoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3355 Published June 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The lung is an organ that is sensitive to mutations induced by chemicals in ambient air, and transgenic mice harboring guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (gpt) gene as a target gene are a well-established model system for assessing genotoxicity in vivo. Transcription factor Nrf2 mediates inducible and constitutive expression of cytoprotective enzymes against xenobiotics and mutagens. To address whether Nrf2 is also involved in DNA protection, we generated nrf2+/−::gpt and nrf2−/−::gpt mice. The spontaneous mutation frequency of the gpt gene in the lung was approximately three times higher in nrf2-null (nrf2−/−) mice than nrf2 heterozygous (nrf2+/−) and wild-type (nrf2+/+) mice, whereas in the liver, the mutation frequency was higher in nrf2−/− and nrf2+/− mice than in nrf2+/+ wild-type mice. By contrast, no difference in mutation frequency was observed in testis among the three genotypes. A single intratracheal instillation of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) increased the lung mutation frequency 3.1- and 6.1-fold in nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice, respectively, compared with BaP-untreated nrf2+/− mice, showing that nrf2−/− mice are more susceptible to genotoxic carcinogens. Surprisingly, mutation profiles of the gpt gene in BaP-treated nrf2+/− mice was substantially different from that in BaP-untreated nrf2−/− mice. In nrf2−/− mice, spontaneous and BaP-induced mutation hotspots were observed at nucleotides 64 and 140 of gpt, respectively. These results thus show that Nrf2 aids in the prevention of mutations in vivo and suggest that Nrf2 protects genomic DNA against certain types of mutations. [Cancer Res 2007;67(12):5643–8]

  • environmental mutagen
  • in vivo mutagenesis
  • knockout mice
  • oxidative stress
  • phase II drug-metabolizing enzyme

Introduction

Nrf2 is an essential transcription factor for inducible and constitutive expression of several phase II detoxification enzymes, including glutathione S-transferase-α (GST-α) and GST-π and UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1A6 ( 1). Nrf2 also regulates the expression of antioxidant enzymes, including NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase-1 and heme oxygenase-1, in response to oxidative stress ( 2, 3). Keap1 acts to harness Nrf2 to the cytoplasm, and Nrf2 in this complex rapidly undergoes ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation via Keap1-Cullin 3 E3 interactions ( 4). However, oxidative or electrophilic modification of Keap1 triggers Nrf2 stabilization ( 5, 6). During oxidative conditions, Nrf2 translocates into the nucleus and activates cytoprotective gene expression by heterodimerizing with small Maf family members and binding to antioxidant-responsive elements (ARE) or electrophile-responsive element in regulatory regions of cytoprotective genes.

Nrf2-mediated induction of cytoprotective enzymes plays an important role in mitigating the adverse effects of mutagens and oxidants. In Nrf2-deficient mice, which have attenuated basal and inducible expression of these enzymes ( 7): (a) DNA adduct formation is accelerated after diesel exhaust exposure ( 8); (b) hepatotoxicity is enhanced after acetaminophen administration ( 9); and (c) benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)–induced DNA adduct and neoplasm formation in forestomach is more prevalent than in wild-type mice ( 10, 11). Taken together, Nrf2 attenuation or malfunction may be an important aspect of diseases caused by environmental mutagens or oxidants, although the mechanism linking Nrf2 deficiency and mutation frequency is not well understood.

Transgenic guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (gpt) delta mice are a model system for detecting in vivo mutations ( 12). In this mouse system, the gpt gene is integrated into the genome as a target gene for detecting mutations, and when the gpt gene is rescued from genomic DNA to Escherichia coli, gpt mutants can be randomly selected as rescued E. coli colonies that form on plates containing 6-thioguanine (6-TG). To assess whether Nrf2 deficiency increases the mutational risk following exposure to BaP, the current study uses nrf2−/−::gpt mice to analyze mutagenic activity in vivo. Furthermore, alterations in the mutation spectrum between nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice were assessed after exposure to BaP.

Materials and Methods

Mice. C57BL/6J nrf2 knockout mice ( 7) and gpt delta mice (C57BL/6J background; ref. 12) were as described previously, and gpt mice were obtained from Japan SLC. Nrf2-deficient mice (nrf2−/−) were crossed with gpt delta transgenic mice (nrf2+/+::gpt/gpt), and the resultant F1 mice (nrf2+/−::gpt/0) were crossed again with Nrf2-deficient mice (nrf2−/−) to produce nrf2 knockout gpt mice that are homozygous (nrf2−/−) or heterozygous (nrf2+/−) to the nrf2 knockout allele (nrf2+/−::gpt and nrf2−/−::gpt, respectively). Genotyping for nrf2 was accomplished by PCR amplification of genomic DNA isolated from tails. PCR primers were as follows: 5′-TGGACGGGACTATTGAAGGCTG-3′ (sense for both genotype) and 5′-GCCGCCTTTTCAGTAGATGGAGG-3′ (antisense for wild-type mice) and 5′-GCGGATTGACCGTAATGGGATAGG-3′ (antisense for LacZ). The presence of the gpt transgene was confirmed by PCR as previously described ( 12). Nine male Nrf2-deficient gpt delta mice (nrf2−/−::gpt) and nine male heterozygous nrf2 knockout gpt delta mice (nrf2+/−::gpt), both 7 to 9 weeks old, were obtained from this breeding scheme. Experiments were done according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at National Institute for Environmental Studies.

Mouse treatment. BaP (Wako Pure Chemical) was dissolved in tricaprylin [CH3(CH2)6COOCH2]2CHOCO(CH2)6CH3 (Sigma-Aldrich). Five nrf2+/−::gpt mice and four nrf2−/−::gpt mice were treated with 1 mg BaP dissolved in 50 μL tricaprylin given in a single intratracheal instillation under anesthesia with halothane for mutation analysis as previously reported ( 13). Vehicle (50 μL tricaprylin) was given to five nrf2+/−::gpt mice and four nrf2−/−::gpt mice as BaP-untreated groups. For immunoblot analysis, three nrf2+/− or nrf2−/− mice were used for each group. Mice were sacrificed 1 and 14 days after BaP administration under anesthesia with ethyl ether for Western blotting and mutation analysis, respectively. Lungs were removed, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until the DNA was isolated.

gpt mutation assay. Genomic DNA was extracted from the lungs using the RecoverEase DNA Isolation kit (Stratagene). Lambda EG10 phages were recovered from the genomic DNA using Transpack Packaging Extract (Stratagene). E. coli (YG6020 expressing Cre recombinase) were infected with the recovered phage harboring the gpt gene and the chloramphenicol (Cm) acethyltransferase (cat) gene (a selection marker), and these genes were rescued as a plasmid ( 14). The gpt mutants can be detected as colonies arising on plates containing Cm and 6-TG. The bacteria were then spread onto M9 salts plates containing Cm and 6-TG, which were incubated for 72 h at 37°C for selection of the colonies harboring a plasmid carrying a mutated gpt gene and cat gene. The 6-TG–resistant colonies were streaked onto selection plates for confirmation of the resistant phenotype. The cells were then cultured in Luria-Bertani broth containing 25 μg/mL of Cm at 37°C and collected by centrifugation. The bacterial pellets were stored at −80°C until DNA sequencing analysis was done. Mutant frequencies for the gpt gene were calculated by dividing the number of colonies growing on (M9 + Cm + 6-TG) agar plates by the number of colonies growing on (M9 + Cm) agar plates, which is the number of colonies harboring the plasmid. To ensure determination of the mutant frequency, mutant colonies were selected from over 300,000 colonies ( 15).

PCR and DNA sequencing analysis of 6-TG–resistant mutants. A 739-bp DNA fragment containing the gpt gene was amplified by PCR using primer 1 and primer 2, as described previously ( 13). The reaction mixture contained 5 pmol of each primer and 200 mmol/L of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate. PCR amplification was carried out using Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio) and done with a Model PTC-100 Thermal Cycler (MJ Research). After the PCR products were purified, sequencing reactions were done by using a DYEnamic ET Terminator kit (Amersham Biosciences). The sequencing primers (primer A and primer C) were as described previously ( 13).

Immunoblot analysis of GSTs. Frozen lung was homogenized with 2 mL of 50 mmol/L HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L DTT, and 0.2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride by glass-Teflon homogenizer chilled with ice. The homogenates were subjected to two steps of centrifugation at 4°C (15,000 × g for 15 min followed by 100,000 × g for 60 min) according to Chanas et al. ( 16). Resulting 100,000 × g supernatants (cytosol fractions) were stored at −80°C until use. After the cytosol fractions mixed with sample buffer containing 1% SDS were heated at 95°C, 9 μg protein (for detecting GST A1/2) or 3 μg protein (for detecting GST A3 and GST P1/2) from each sample was subjected to SDS-PAGE with 15% polyacrylamide gel ( 17). Proteins separated on the gel were transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Amersham Biosciences). GST A1/2, GST A3 ( 18– 20), and GST P1/2 were immunochemically detected using anti-mouse GST A1/2 and A3 rabbit sera (kindly provided by Dr. J.D. Hayes, University of Dundee, United Kingdom) and GST P1/2 rabbit serum (kindly provided by Dr. I. Hatayama, Aomori Prefecture Institute of Public Health and Environment, Japan), respectively, and goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase ( 16). ECL-plus and Typhoon 9400 BioImage analyzer (Amersham Biosciences) were used to visualize bands.

Statistical analysis. All data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance of mutant frequency was evaluated using the Student's t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical comparisons of mutational spectra were done using the Adams-Skopek test ( 21).

Results and Discussion

The frequency of spontaneous mutations in the lung, liver, and testis was compared among gpt delta mice (nrf2+/+), heterozygous mice (nrf2+/−), and homozygous mice (nrf2−/−). In the lung and liver, the mutation frequency was significantly elevated in nrf2−/− mice, compared with nrf2+/+ mice ( Fig. 1A ; Supplementary Table S1). The mutant frequency in the lung was approximately three times higher in nrf2−/− mice (1.40 ± 0.28 × 10−5) than nrf2+/− and nrf2+/+ mice (0.48 ± 0.05 × 10−5 and 0.50 ± 0.16 × 10−5, respectively), whereas the mutant frequency was significantly higher in both nrf2−/− and nrf2+/− mice (1.24 ± 0.13 × 10−5 and 1.47 ± 0.15 × 10−5, respectively) than nrf2+/+ mice in liver (0.72 ± 0.24 × 10−5). In contrast, no difference in mutation frequency was observed in testis among the three genotypes ( Fig. 1A). Whereas the DNA repair system is quite efficient in the testis ( 22), metabolically active tissues, such as the liver and lung, seem to be unable to efficiently repair the DNA adducts produced by reactive oxygen species and/or endogenous mutagens without the presence of Nrf2. These results suggest that Nrf2 acts to suppress spontaneous mutagenesis in the lung and liver.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

The mutant frequency of 6-TG selection (A) in the lung, liver, and testis of gpt delta mice (nrf2+/+, yellow column, n = 3), and nrf2+/− (light blue column, n = 5) and nrf2−/− (pink column, n = 4) gpt delta mice and (B) in the lungs of nrf2+/− (blue column, n = 5) and nrf2−/− (red column, n = 4) gpt delta mice after BaP treatment. Data of nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− lungs in (A) are replicated as BaP-untreated nrf2+/− and nrf2−/−, respectively, in (B). Columns, mean; bars, SD. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, statistical significance among the groups was determined using the Student's t test.

We aimed to quantitatively determine how Nrf2 deficiency affects mutagenicity in vivo in the lung using a single intratracheal instillation of BaP as a model environmental mutagen/carcinogen ( 13). BaP in cigarette smoke or ambient air is readily oxidized to reactive intermediates, such as BaP diol epoxide, by phase I detoxifying enzymes ( 23), and these intermediates are subsequently metabolized to hydrophilic conjugates by phase II detoxifying enzymes that are under Nrf2 regulation. However, unconjugated reactive intermediates, which often form, lead to DNA adduct formation ( 24). DNA adducts cause mispairing of DNA bases and induce gene mutations through the DNA replication process ( 25, 26). This process has been confirmed by in vitro experiment using BaP adduct-containing DNA as a template ( 27, 28). Indeed, a single intratracheal instillation of BaP into gpt delta mice resulted in a statistically significant and dose-dependent increase in the mutant frequency in the lungs of gpt delta mice, and the most frequent mutation induced by BaP was G:C to T:A transversion ( 13), which is characteristic of BaP mutagenesis ( 25, 26).

Therefore, nrf2−/−::gpt and nrf2+/−::gpt mice were given a carcinogenic dose (1 mg; ref. 29) of BaP through trachea, which resulted in a significant increase in the mutation frequency in lungs of both nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice. Importantly, BaP-treated nrf2−/− mice had a 2-fold higher mutant frequency (2.93 ± 0.56 × 10−5) than BaP-treated nrf2+/− mice (1.47 ± 0.31 × 10−5; Fig. 1B; Supplementary Table S2). The increment of mutant frequency by BaP treatment was higher in nrf2−/− mice than in nrf2+/− mice.

We thought that the expression level of Nrf2-regulated cytoprotective enzymes may explain both the higher basal mutant frequency in the Nrf2-deficient mouse and that following treatment of Nrf2-deficient mouse with BaP. Because Chanas et al. have shown that the class π GST isozymes are expressed at substantially lower levels in the livers of Nrf2-deficient mice than in wild-type mice ( 16). Because a thorough study of pulmonary GSTs in Nrf2- deficient mice has not been described in the literature, we decided to examine whether expression of GSTs was actually suppressed in the lungs of BaP-treated and BaP-untreated nrf2−/− mice by immunoblotting. In this study, we have examined expression of GST A1/2, GST A3, and GST P1/2, as these GSTs are known to be under the regulation of the Nrf2-ARE system ( 7) and are essential for the detoxification of BaP ( 30). Showing very good agreement with the report by Chanas et al. ( 16), which analyzed the expression of these enzymes in the mouse livers, the expression level of GST A1/2 was suppressed in the lungs of nrf2−/− mice compared with that in the nrf2+/− mice ( Fig. 2 ), and the level of GST A3 was also low in Nrf2-deficient mice (data not shown). Under the experimental condition, GST A1/2 level was not elevated substantially by the BaP treatment in the lungs of nrf2+/− mice. Similarly, the expression level of GST P1/2 was also suppressed in the lungs of nrf2−/− mice compared with that in the nrf2+/− mice. GST P1/2 level was elevated by the BaP treatment in the lung of nrf2+/− mice, but there was no such difference in nrf2−/− mice. As the change in this immunoblotting experiment was relatively small, we repeated this experiment and found that the result was reproducible (data not shown). These results thus suggest that Nrf2 keeps the mutation frequency at low level in the lungs of mice by directing the expression the GSTs. As the changes in this GST immunoblotting experiments was relatively small, we speculate that lack of the other Nrf2 target genes may also contribute to the mutant frequency in Nrf2-deficient mice.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Immunodetection of GSTs. Cytosol fractions were extracted from the lungs of nrf2+/− (+/−) and nrf2−/− (−/−) mice, separated on SDS/PAGE, and electrophoretically blotted to Immobilon-P membrane. GST A1/2 and GST P1/2 were detected immunochemically using specific antibodies and ECL-plus system. BaP, cytosol fractions extracted from BaP-treated mouse lungs; Cont, cytosol fractions extracted from BaP-untreated mouse lungs.

To further characterize the mutational profile in the lungs of nrf2−/−::gpt and nrf2+/−::gpt mice after BaP exposure, we did DNA sequence analysis of 178 gpt mutant lung samples ( Fig. 3 ; Supplementary Table S3). In nrf2−/− mice, the predominant spontaneous mutations were G:C to T:A transversion (26%, 15 of 58), G:C to A:T transition (24%, 14 of 58), and base deletions (19%, 11 of 58; Supplementary Table S3). A previous report of gpt delta mice (mmh/ogg1::gpt) suggested that accumulation of 8-hydroxyguanine in cells was the primary cause of increase in G:C to T:A transversion ( 31). 8-Hydroxyguanine may also play a role in the induction of G:C to T:A transversion in the lungs of nrf2−/− mice because the level of antioxidant enzymes were suppressed in nrf2−/− mice, and subsequently, generation of reactive oxygen spices was probably accelerated.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Comparison of mutant frequencies among the types of mutations in BaP-treated and BaP-untreated nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice. Light blue column, BaP-untreated nrf2+/− mice; pink column, BaP-untreated nrf2−/− mice; blue column, BaP-treated nrf2+/− mice; red column, BaP-treated nrf2−/− mice.

The BaP treatment increased base substitutions at G:C pairs and one base deletion both in nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice ( Fig. 3). Among the G:C substitutions, G:C to T:A and G:C to C:G transversions were markedly elevated in nrf2−/− mice after BaP treatment. Consistent with our previous studies with gpt delta mice ( 13), the predominant mutation provoked by BaP treatment was a G:C to T:A transversion (a major base substitute induced by the BaP-DNA adduct formation) in both nrf2+/− (32%, 14 of 44) and nrf2−/− (34%, 21 of 62) mice (Supplementary Table S2), and the mutant frequency of this transversion was higher in BaP-treated nrf2−/− mice than BaP-treated nrf2+/− mice ( Fig. 3). In the lungs of nrf2−/− mice, DNA adducts are probably accumulated in the higher level than those in nrf2+/− mice because the expression levels of phase II enzymes that detoxify BaP by forming conjugates ( 32) and antioxidant enzymes are low in nrf2−/− mice comparing to nrf2+/− mice. We surmise that this increase of DNA adduct formation might elevate the mutant frequency of G:C to T:A transversion in the Nrf2-deficient condition. Additionally, generation of oxidative DNA adduct due to BaP-derived quinines ( 33) may be accelerated in nrf2−/− mice and play a role, albeit partly, in elevating the mutant frequency in nrf2−/− mice. Indeed, BaP adduct formation was accelerated ∼2-fold in Nrf2-deficient mouse forestomach compared with wild-type mice ( 11), supporting our contention that the increase in the amount of DNA adduct enhanced the frequency of these transversions at G:C pairs.

To delineate the mode of mutation in Nrf2-deficient mice, the mutation positions in the gpt gene of BaP-treated and BaP-untreated mice were determined ( Fig. 4A ; Supplementary Table S4). Of the mutations found in BaP-treated mice (shown in lower side of the gpt sequence; Fig. 4A), G:C to T:A transversions at nucleotides 140, 143, and 189 were observed in three or more mice, including both nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice. Thus, these nucleotides are the hotspots of BaP-induced mutation. These nucleotides coincide with those previously reported (i.e., nucleotides 115, 140, 143, 189, and 413; ref. 13), which are shown with green arrows in Fig. 4A. The frequency of mutation at these hotspots was rather low in BaP-untreated mice (shown in upper side of the gpt sequence; Fig. 4A).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Overall distribution of the mutation detected on the gpt gene in the lungs of BaP-treated nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice and BaP-untreated nrf2+/− and nrf2−/− mice. The mutations are summarized in Supplementary Table S4. A, Mutations detected in nrf2+/− (blue) and nrf2−/− (pink) mice. The mutations detected in BaP-treated (below gpt sequence) and BaP-untreated mice (above gpt sequence). The number of characters in parenthesis is the number of mutations in one mouse. Δ, one base deletion; half-boxes, deleted nucleotides; V, a position of insertion. Green arrows, guanine nucleotides of BaP-induced mutation hotspots reported previously ( 13); orange characters, mutation hotspots found in this study. B, close-up of hotspots of mutations.

Because mutations were accumulated at relatively high level in the gpt gene of nrf2−/− mice even without BaP treatment, we assumed that we could assess hotspots of spontaneous mutation in these mice. Indeed, G:C to A:T transition at nucleotides 64 was observed in three BaP-untreated mice and one BaP-treated mouse. This mutation is exclusive in nrf2−/− mice. Thus, nucleotide 64 is the spontaneous mutation hotspot in Nrf2-deficient condition. In contrast, nucleotides 110 and 115 are common hotspots in BaP-treated and BaP-untreated mice; G:C to A:T transition at position 110 was observed in three BaP-untreated and three BaP-treated mice, and G:C to T:A transversion was also induced in three BaP-untreated mice.

Figure 4B shows mutation hotspots in the gpt gene. We found that one of the major trinucleotide sequences with BaP-induced guanine nucleotide mutation in this gene was CGT (nucleotides 110, 143, and 189). This is in good agreement with the previous observation that the instillation of BaP into the lung of gpt delta mice induced mutations frequently in CGT trinucleotide of the gene ( 13). CGG (nucleotides 64, 115, and 413) was another frequently found trinucleotide with guanine nucleotide mutations, but no link was found between this mutation and BaP treatment. It should be noted that guanine centered in CGC at position 140 was a frequent target of BaP-induced mutation in Nrf2-deficient condition, whereas previous experiments showed mutations were little in CGC of wild-type mice ( 13).

Whereas there was no significant difference in the mutation frequency, the position of the mutation was significantly different between BaP-untreated nrf2−/− mice and BaP-treated nrf2+/− mice ( Fig. 4A; P < 0.05, Adams-Skopek test). This result suggests that chemical mutagenesis and spontaneous mutation in the nrf2−/− mice arise through different mechanisms. Thus, the Nrf2 deficiency had a marked affect on the mutational profile that arose either spontaneously or by BaP induction. However, further studies are required to clarify how Nrf2 deficiency alters the mutation profile, and whether nucleotides surrounding the guanine nucleotide are important for the mutation frequency in BaP-treated mice and in BaP-untreated nrf2−/− mice.

Several lines of recent evidence have pointed towards a role for Nrf2 in prevention of carcinogenesis. One of the salient examples is that Nrf2 could prevent the formation of DNA adduct and gastric tumors from occurring after BaP administration ( 10, 11). Furthermore, Nrf2-deficient mice are sensitive to the alkylating agent [N-nitrosobutyl(4-hydrixybutyl)amine] and rapidly form bladder tumors after administration ( 34). This study shows that Nrf2 can prevent increase in the number of spontaneous and inducible mutations that occur in the gpt gene in mouse lung and liver and can prevent the induction of mutations at the hotspots, such as nucleotides 64 and 140 in the lung. We surmise that through induction of phase II and antioxidant enzyme activities as well as cross-talk with phase I detoxifying system ( 35), Nrf2 can mitigate the effects of mutagens, such as BaP, on adduct formation, leading to protection from neoplasm and tumor formation and ultimately aiding in prevention of pulmonary diseases that arise, such as lung cancer from tobacco smoke ( 36), or from hyperoxic injury ( 37).

The results presented in this study suggest that Nrf2 deficiency is a possible risk factor for development of lung cancer or other lung diseases caused by mutagens or oxidants in ambient air. Whereas molecular mechanisms by which Nrf2 deficiency changes the mutation profile still require clarification, one plausible explanation is that Nrf2 deficiency may allow accumulation of specific reactive oxygen intermediates or electrophiles. We are now examining how exaggerated mutagenesis in the Nrf2-deficient condition quantitatively contributes to the enhanced carcinogenicity. We believe that the Nrf2-deficient gpt delta mice will provide useful information for revealing the relationship between in vivo mutagenesis and carcinogenicity.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences grant-in-aid for scientific research 14207100 (Y. Aoki, A.H. Hashimoto, T. Nohmi, and M. Yamamoto) and JST-ERATO (K. Itoh and M. Yamamoto).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Dr. John D. Hayes for providing us anti-mouse GST A1/2 and GST A3 antibodies; Dr. Ichiro Hatayama for GST P1/2 antibody; Drs. Hiroaki Shiraishi, Wakae Maruyama, Rie Yanagisawa (National Institute for Environmental Studies), and Jon Maher (University of Tsukuba) for their support and advice; and Yukari Sakashita, Yoshiki Sugawara (National Institute for Environmental Studies), and Katsuyoshi Hayashi (Animal Care Co., Ltd.) for their excellent technical contribution.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Y. Aoki and A.H. Hashimoto contributed equally to this work.

  • Received September 18, 2006.
  • Revision received March 10, 2007.
  • Accepted April 9, 2007.
  • ©2007 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Motohashi H, Yamamoto M. Nrf2-Keap-1 defines a physiologically important stress response mechanism. Trends Mol Med 2004; 10: 549–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Ishii T, Itoh K, Takahashi S, et al. Transcription factor Nrf2 coordinately regulates a group of oxidative stress-inducible genes in macrophages. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 16023–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Cho HY, Jedlicka AE, Reddy SP, et al. Role of NRF2 in protection against hyperoxic lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002; 26: 175–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Tong KI, Kobayashi A, Katsuoka F, Yamamoto M. Two-site substrate recognition model for Keap1-Nrf2 system: a hinge and latch mechanism. Biol Chem 2006; 387: 1311–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Itoh K, Tong KI, Yamamoto M. Molecular mechanism activating Nrf2-Keap1 pathway in regulation of adaptive response to electrophiles. Free Radic Biol Med 2004; 36: 1208–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Kobayashi A, Kang MI, Watai Y, et al. Oxidative and electrophilic stresses activate Nrf2 through inhibition of ubiquitination activity of Keap1. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26: 221–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Itoh K, Chiba T, Takahashi S, et al. An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 236: 313–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Aoki Y, Sato H, Nishimura N, Takahashi S, Itoh K, Yamamoto M. Accelerated DNA adduct formation in the lung of the Nrf2 knockout mouse exposed to diesel exhaust. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001; 173: 154–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Enomoto A, Itoh K, Nagayoshi E, et al. High sensitivity of Nrf2 knockout mice to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity associated with decreased expression of ARE-regulated drug metabolizing enzymes and antioxidant genes. Toxicol Sci 2001; 59: 169–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Ramos-Gomez M, Kwak MK, Dolan PM, et al. Sensitivity to carcinogenesis is increased and chemoprotective efficacy of enzyme inducers is lost in nrf2 transcription factor-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 3410–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Ramos-Gomez M, Dolan PM, Itoh K, Yamamoto M, Kensler TW. Interactive effects of nrf2 genotype and oltipraz on benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts and tumor yield in mice. Carcinogenesis 2003; 24: 461–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Nohmi T, Katoh M, Suzuki H, et al. A new transgenic mouse mutagenesis test system using Spi- and 6-thioguanine selections. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996; 28: 465–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Hashimoto AH, Amanuma K, Hiyoshi K, et al. In vivo mutagenesis induced by benzo[a]pyrene instilled into the lung of gpt delta transgenic mice. Environ Mol Mutagen 2005; 45: 365–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Nohmi T, Suzuki T, Masumura K. Recent advances in the protocols of transgenic mouse mutation assays. Mutat Res 2000; 455: 191–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Thybund V, Dean S, Nohmi T, et al. In vivo transgenic mutation assays. Mutat Res 2003; 540: 141–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Chanas SA, Jiang G, McMahon M, et al. Loss of the Nrf2 transcription factor causes a marked reduction in constitutive and inducible expression of the glutathione S-transferase Gsta1, Gsta2, Gstm1, Gstm2, Gstm3 and Gstm4 genes in the liver of male and female mice. Biochem J 2002; 365: 405–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Aoki Y, Satoh K, Sato K, Suzuki KT. Induction of glutathione S-transferase P-form in primary cultured rat liver parenchymal cells by co-planar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners. Biochem J 1992; 281: 539–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    McLellan LI, Hayes JD. Differential induction of class alpha glutathione S-transferases in mouse liver by the anticarcinogenic antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole. Purification and characterization of glutathione S-transferase Ya1Ya1. Biochem J 1989; 263: 393–402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. Hayes JD, Judah DJ, Neal GE, Nguyen T. Molecular cloning and heterologous expression of a cDNA encoding a mouse glutathione S-transferase Yc subunit possessing high catalytic activity for aflatoxin B1-8,9-epoxide. Biochem J 1992; 285: 173–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Hayes JD, Flangan JU, Jowsey IR. Glutathione transferase. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 25: 51–88.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    Cariello NF, Piegorsch WW, Adams WT, Skopek TR. Computer program for the analysis of mutational spectra: application to p53 mutations. Carcinogenesis 1994; 15: 2281–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Tomascik-Cheeseman LM, Colemana MA, Marchettia F, et al. Differential basal expression of genes associated with stress response, damage control, and DNA repair among mouse tissues. Mutat Res 2004; 561: 1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Buening MK, Wislocki PG, Levin W, et al. Tumorigenicity of the optical enantiomers of the diastereomeric benzo[a]pyrene 7,8-diol-9,10-epoxides in newborn mice: exceptional activity of (+)-7beta,8alpha-dihydroxy-9alpha,10alpha-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978; 75: 5358–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Cosman M, de los Santos C, Fiala F, et al. Solution conformation of the major adduct between the carcinogen (+)-anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide and DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 1914–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Hakura A, Tsutsui Y, Sonoda J, Tsukidate K, Mikami T, Sagami F. Comparison of the mutational spectra of the lacZ transgene in four origins of the Muta Mouse treated with benzo[a]pyrene: target organ specificity. Mutat Res 2000; 447: 239–47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Shane BS, de Boer J, Watson DE, Haseman JK, Glickman BW, Tindall KR. LacI mutation spectra following benzo[a]pyrene treatment of Big Blue mice. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21: 715–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Hanrahan CJ, Bacolod MD, Vyas RR, et al. Sequence specific mutagenesis of the major (+)-anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-DNA adduct at a mutational hot spot in vitro and in Escherichia coli cells. Chem Res Toxicol 1997; 10: 369–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Chiapperino D, Kroth H, Kramarczuk IH, et al. Preferential misincorporation of purine nucleotides by human DNA polymerase eta opposite benzo[a]pyrene 7,8-diol 9,10-epoxide deoxyguanosine adducts. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 11765–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Yoshimoto T, Inoue T, Iizuka H, et al. Differential induction of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma on mouse lung by intratracheal instillation of benzo(a)pyrene and charcoal powder. Cancer Res 1980; 40: 4301–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Dreij K, Sundberg K, Johansson AS, et al. Catalytic activities of human alpha class, glutathione transferases toward carcinogenic dibenzo[a l]pyrene diol epoxides. Chem Res Toxicol 2002; 15: 825–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Arai T, Kelly VP, Komoro K, Minowa O, Noda T, Nishimura S. Cell proliferation in liver of mmh/ogg1-deficient mice enhances mutation frequency because of the presence of 8-hydroxyguanine in DNA. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 4287–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Srivastava SK, Watkins SC, Schuetz E, Singh SV. Role of glutathione conjugate efflux in cellular protection against benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide-induced DNA damage. Mol Carcinog 2002; 33: 156–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Burdick AD, Davis JW II, Liu KJ, et al. Benzo[a]pyrene quinones increase cell proliferation, generate reactive oxygen species, and transactivate the epidermal growth factor receptor in breast epithelial cells. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 7825–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Iida K, Itoh K, Kumagai Y, et al. Nrf2 is essential for the chemopreventive efficacy of oltipraz against urinary bladder carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 6424–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Kohle C, Bock KW. Activation of coupled Ah receptor and Nrf2 gene batteries by dietary phytochemicals in relation to chemoprevention. Biochem Pharmacol 2006; 72: 795–805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Wenzlaff AS, Cote ML, Bock CH, Land SJ, Schwartz AG. GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms, environmental tobacco smoke exposure and risk of lung cancer among never smokers: a population-based study. Carcinogenesis 2005; 26: 395–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Cho HY, Jedlicka AE, Reddy SP, Zhang LY, Kensler TW, Kleeberger SR. Linkage analysis of susceptibility to hyperoxia. Nrf2 is a candidate gene. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2002; 26: 42–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 67 (12)
June 2007
Volume 67, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhanced Spontaneous and Benzo(a)pyrene-Induced Mutations in the Lung of Nrf2-Deficient gpt Delta Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Enhanced Spontaneous and Benzo(a)pyrene-Induced Mutations in the Lung of Nrf2-Deficient gpt Delta Mice
Yasunobu Aoki, Akiko H. Hashimoto, Kimiko Amanuma, Michi Matsumoto, Kyoko Hiyoshi, Hirohisa Takano, Ken-ichi Masumura, Ken Itoh, Takehiko Nohmi and Masayuki Yamamoto
Cancer Res June 15 2007 (67) (12) 5643-5648; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3355

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Enhanced Spontaneous and Benzo(a)pyrene-Induced Mutations in the Lung of Nrf2-Deficient gpt Delta Mice
Yasunobu Aoki, Akiko H. Hashimoto, Kimiko Amanuma, Michi Matsumoto, Kyoko Hiyoshi, Hirohisa Takano, Ken-ichi Masumura, Ken Itoh, Takehiko Nohmi and Masayuki Yamamoto
Cancer Res June 15 2007 (67) (12) 5643-5648; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3355
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • HSF1-Mediated Aneuploidy in p53-Defective Cells
  • Mechanisms of Invasive Urothelial Tumorigenesis
  • Alternate mRNA 3′ Processing Characterizes Distinct Tumors
Show more Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement