Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology

A Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonism In vivo

Ashwani Rajput, Alan P. Koterba, Jeffrey I. Kreisberg, Jason M. Foster, James K.V. Willson and Michael G. Brattain
Ashwani Rajput
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan P. Koterba
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey I. Kreisberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason M. Foster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James K.V. Willson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael G. Brattain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2773 Published January 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, constitutive activation of EGFR rendered FET cells resistant to GFDS-induced apoptosis. FET vector control and FETα cells were deprived of growth factors after growth to 80% confluence. Cells were harvested at the indicated times and Western blot was done with anti-PARP antibody. B, repression of constitutive EGFR activation led to decreased activation of EGFR, Erk, and Akt. FETα cells were treated with 0.1 μg/mL of tetracycline for 3 d to repress constitutive EGFR activation. Cells were harvested and lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-EGFR antibody. Western blot was done with anti-pTyr, anti-EGFR, anti-pErk, anti-Erk, anti-pAKT, and anti-AKT antibodies. Image Quant software was used to quantify protein levels.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    A, inhibition of xenograft growth of FETα cells by tetracycline. Exponentially growing cells (5 × 106) were inoculated s.c. in athymic nude mice. Tetracycline (3 mg/mL) was added to the drinking water daily from day 30 onwards. Tumors were measured externally on the indicated days in two dimensions using calipers. Tumor volumes were determined by the equation V = (L × W2) × 0.5, where L, length; and W, width of the tumor. Values are the mean of 10 xenografts. B, GFP labeled 5 × 106 FETα cells were inoculated into athymic nude mice. Thirty days after inoculation, tetracycline (3 mg/mL) was added to the drinking water daily for 34 d.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis in FETα cells treated with tetracycline. A, four xenografts were harvested on each indicated day. The CAS 200 image analyzer was used to determine the mean proliferative activity for each group. B, slides were prepared from the harvested xenografts for standard immunohistochemistry and Ki-67 staining for FETα and FETα cells treated with tetracycline (Dako Corporation). C, apoptotic rates were determined by an average of three random 75 μm2 fields at 20× magnification. D, slides were prepared from harvested xenografts for standard Apotag TUNEL assay for both FETα and FETα tetracycline–treated animals (Oncor).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    A to D, immunohistochemical validation of signal transduction. FETα xenografts were harvested and placed in buffered formalin for 24 h and then paraffin embedded. Slides were prepared for standard immunohistochemistry to evaluate the effect of tetracycline on the expression of TGFα, activated EGFR, activated Erk, and activated AKT. Phosphospecific antibodies were used to generate this data. Each experiment has negative control staining (top left), FET control cells (top right), FETα-untreated cells (bottom left), and FETα tetracycline–treated cells (bottom right).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Effects of clinical EGFR antagonist on FETα cells in vivo and in vitro. A, FETα cells were treated with 5 μmol/L of CI-1033 for 3 h. Cells were harvested and lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-EGFR antibody. Western blot was done with anti-pTyr, anti-EGFR, anti-pErk, anti-Erk, anti-pAkt, and anti-Akt antibodies. B, ten animals with FETα xenografts were treated with CI-1033. Thirteen days postinjection, animals were treated with CI-1033 at 80 mg/mL in 0.557 mol/L of isothionic acid in lactate buffer (pH 7.0) by gavage. Treatment was continued for up to 15 d. Control animals received gavage treatment with isothionic acid/lactate buffer (vehicle) only. Animals were euthanized and tumors were harvested after 15 d of treatment. Tumor volumes were determined by the equation V = (L × W2) × 0.5, where L, length; W, width of the tumor. C, FETα cells were treated with AG879, an ERBb2 antagonist, and Western blots evaluating phosphorylated ERBb2 and p-Akt. D, FETα cells were treated with the 2C4 antibody to ERBb2 and Western blots to p-ERBb2 and p-Erk, and p70S6k are shown.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    A to C, CI-1033 inhibits activation of EGFR and Erk, but not AKT. Thirteen days postinoculation; xenografts were treated with CI-1033 and harvested after 10 or 14 d of treatment. Tissues were placed in buffered formalin for 24 h and paraffin embedded. Immunohistochemistry was done for p-EGFR, p-Erk, and p-AKT on negative control, vehicle control, 10 day–treated and 14 day–treated xenografts.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 67 (2)
January 2007
Volume 67, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonism In vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonism In vivo
Ashwani Rajput, Alan P. Koterba, Jeffrey I. Kreisberg, Jason M. Foster, James K.V. Willson and Michael G. Brattain
Cancer Res January 15 2007 (67) (2) 665-673; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2773

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Novel Mechanism of Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonism In vivo
Ashwani Rajput, Alan P. Koterba, Jeffrey I. Kreisberg, Jason M. Foster, James K.V. Willson and Michael G. Brattain
Cancer Res January 15 2007 (67) (2) 665-673; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2773
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab: Enhanced Antitumor Activity
  • Imatinib Sensitizes Bcr-Abl+ Cells to Cisplatin
  • Loss of S1P Lyase Upregulates Bcl-2
Show more Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement