Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Priority Reports

Treatment of Invasive Retinoblastoma in a Murine Model Using an Oncolytic Picornavirus

Lalita Wadhwa, Mary Y. Hurwitz, Patricia Chévez-Barrios and Richard L. Hurwitz
Lalita Wadhwa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Y. Hurwitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Chévez-Barrios
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Hurwitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2352 Published November 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Retinoblastoma, the most common intraocular malignancy of childhood, metastasizes by initial invasion of the choroid and the optic nerve. There is no effective treatment for metastatic retinoblastoma, especially when the central nervous system (CNS) is involved, and prevention of this complication is a treatment priority. Seneca Valley Virus (SVV-001) is a conditionally replication-competent picornavirus that is not pathogenic to normal human cells but can kill human retinoblastoma cells in vitro with an IC50 of <1 viral particle (vp) per cell. A xenograft murine model of metastatic retinoblastoma was used to examine the therapeutic potential of SVV-001. Histopathologic analysis of ocular and brain tissues after a single tail vein injection of SVV-001 (1 × 1013 vp/kg) showed effective treatment of choroid and ocular nerve tumor invasion (1 of 20 animals with invasive disease in the treated group versus 7 of 20 animals with invasive disease in the control group; P = 0.017) and prevention of CNS metastasis (0 of 20 animals with CNS metastatic disease in the treated group versus 4 of 20 animals with CNS disease in the control group; P = 0.036). There were no observed adverse events due to the virus in any of the treated animals. SVV-001 may be effective as a treatment of locally invasive and metastatic retinoblastoma. [Cancer Res 2007;67(22):10653–6]

  • retinoblastoma
  • metastatic
  • picornavirus
  • oncolytic
  • cancer therapy

Introduction

Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular malignancy of childhood ( 1, 2). This disease can be inherited or can occur sporadically and results from mutations in the Rb gene either in the germ line or in the tumor alone ( 3). Retinoblastoma can spread peripherally by invading the ocular coats or metastasize to the brain by invading the optic nerve ( 4, 5). No successful therapy is available for patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, whereas only intensive chemotherapy followed by rescue bone marrow transplantation has been reported to successfully treat some patients with peripheral metastasis ( 6– 9). Therefore, finding a successful, low-toxicity therapy to prevent and treat metastatic retinoblastoma is important for children with this complication.

Oncolytic virotherapy has emerged as a potential treatment for a variety of cancers ( 10). Seneca Valley Virus (SVV-001) is a naturally occurring RNA virus that belongs to the group of cardioviruses in the family Picornaviridae. The virus has a short replication cycle and a simple genome and can be grown in high-titer preparations. SVV is not a human pathogen and has no known deleterious effects on any animal, including mice or primates. Pediatric human tumor cell lines of neuroendocrine origin are permissive for SVV-001 infection and replication ( 11). Tumor cells that are capable of binding and internalizing the virus support replication of SVV-001 and are killed during the lytic phase of viral replication. The newly formed virions are then capable of infecting adjacent tumor cells, thus repeating the cycle. After tumor cell lines of neuroendocrine origin were implanted in the flank of nude mice, a single i.v. injection of SVV-001 in the tail vein resulted in infection of the tumor by the virus and a sustained reduction in the tumor volume ( 11). The use of SVV-001 for the treatment of invasive and metastatic disease using a murine xenograft model of aggressive retinoblastoma, a model that closely mimics this childhood cancer ( 12), is now reported.

Materials and Methods

Virus. Seneca Valley Virus (SVV-001; ref. 11) was obtained from Neotropix, Inc.

Cell lines. Y79 and Weri retinoblastoma cell lines, the U251 glioblastoma cell line, and the HEK 293 human embryonic kidney cell line were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and maintained in high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen-Life Technologies) at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified air.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay. Cells were seeded at 2 × 104/mL in DMEM with 5% FBS and infected with SVV-001 from 0.1 to 5 viral particles (vp) per cell. The cultures were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Cells were counted using a hemacytometer and viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.

Murine xenograft model of metastatic retinoblastoma. When Y79 cells are injected into the vitreous space of the eye of an immunodeficient Rag2 mouse, they form intraocular tumors that subsequently invade the choroid and optic nerve and metastasize to the brain, mimicking human retinoblastoma ( 12). Using a Hamilton needle, 2 × 104 Y79 cells were injected into the vitreous space of one eye of anesthetized Rag2 mice. Mice were observed weekly for tumor development. After 3 weeks, intraocular but not extraocular tumors formed. To study the treatment of only intraocular tumors, SVV-001 (1 × 1013 vp/kg into the tail veins) was injected at 3 weeks in one group of 10 animals. The treated animals and an untreated group of 10 animals were sacrificed 2 weeks later and tissues were examined histopathologically. At that time, untreated animals had begun to develop extraocular extension of their tumors. Therefore, to study the effects of the virus on extraocular disease, SVV-001 (1 × 1013 vp/kg into the tail veins) was injected into a group of 10 mice 5 weeks after Y79 cell injection and another group remained untreated. Two weeks later, the study was terminated because the untreated animals were showing evidence of discomfort from their large extraocular tumors. Because invasion into the choroid and optic nerve with metastases to the brain can occur as early as 5 weeks after injection of the retinoblastoma cells, tumor invasiveness and metastasis were analyzed statistically by combining the two treatment groups and comparing them to the two untreated groups.

Histology. The harvested eyes were fixed in formalin and sectioned. Slides were stained with H&E and examined microscopically.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and results were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

Cytotoxicity of retinoblastoma cell lines incubated with SVV-001 in vitro. The cytotoxicity of retinoblastoma cell lines treated with SVV-001 was examined in vitro as described in Materials and Methods. SVV-001 is cytotoxic to Y79 and Weri retinoblastoma cells ( Fig. 1 ). At the highest doses tested, the number of viable cells was reduced by >90% compared with control cells incubated without virus. There was >50% reduction in the number of viable cells at doses as low as 0.5 vp per cell. The virus had no discernible effect on U251 glioma or HEK 293 kidney cells at up to 5 vp per cell. SVV-001 also lacked effect on RTM1796 cells, a murine retinoblastoma cell line derived from a transgenic mouse with retinal tumors that express SV40 T antigen driven by the PAX6 promoter (data not shown). However, a murine neuroblastoma cell line is susceptible to the virus, indicating that some murine neuroendocrine tumor cells can be infected with the virus ( 11). The low dose of virus capable of killing the cells suggests that the virus proliferates in permissive cells, generating additional virus capable of infecting neighboring cells when it is released as the host cells lyse. This hypothesis has recently been confirmed ( 11). SVV-001 can infect and replicate in most human tumor cells that express neuroendocrine markers, such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptors, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, and CD56 ( 11). Although the specific receptor for SVV-001 is currently not known, preliminary evidence indicates that the tropism of SVV-001 is primarily determined by either the binding or internalization receptors expressed on susceptible tumor cells because transfection of viral RNA into nonpermissive cells resulted in viral replication and cell lysis ( 11).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Retinoblastoma cell lines are killed by Seneca Valley Virus in vitro. Y79 (▪) and Weri (⧫) retinoblastoma cells, U251 glioblastoma cells (•), and HEK 293 cells (▾) were seeded at 2 × 104/mL in DMEM with 5% FBS and infected with SVV-001 from 0.1 to 5 vp per cell. The cultures were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion.

Response of a murine xenograft model of retinoblastoma to SVV-001 treatment in vivo. The next question addressed was whether SVV-001 could kill retinoblastoma tumor cells in vivo. Retinoblastoma is exclusively a human disease ( 13, 14). Rb1 mutations in animals do not result in retinal tumors. Transgenic models of the disease have been produced by knocking out multiple retinoblastoma family members and/or P53 ( 13, 15, 16). SVV-001 had no effect on these murine transgenic tumors and none of these animals showed any adverse events after SVV-001 injections (data not shown). An immunodeficient murine xenograft model of retinoblastoma created by injection of human Y79 cells into the vitreous was tested. This model mimics intraocular vitreous seeds without primary retinal tumors and closely resembles the invasive patterns leading to CNS metastasis in human disease. Retinoblastoma cells massively invade the murine choroid and optic nerve 3 to 5 weeks after injection. By 5 weeks, the tumor spreads through the ocular coats and some animals will develop CNS metastases in the subarachnoid space. By 6 to 8 weeks, the animals show discomfort and must be sacrificed. If they are allowed to progress beyond 8 weeks after injection of the tumor cells, all animals ultimately develop CNS metastasis ( 12).

Y79 retinoblastoma cells (2 × 104) were injected into the vitreous of 40 Rag2 immune-incompetent mice. The mice were monitored weekly for tumor growth. Three or 5 weeks after injection of the retinoblastoma cells, SVV-001 (1 × 1013 vp/kg) was injected into the tail veins of 20 mice; the remaining 20 mice served as untreated controls. Two weeks after SVV-001 injections, eyes and brain tissues were harvested and examined.

The gross physical appearance and the histopathologic analysis of eyes of untreated and SVV-001 treated mice revealed clear differences. All of the animals developed intraocular tumors by 3 weeks after intraocular injection of Y79 cells. By 5 weeks, the intraocular tumors of both treated and untreated animals had progressed. None of the treated animals had extraocular extension. By 7 weeks, tumors had completely replaced the eye structures. Of the treated animals, only one had a grossly visible tumor at the time of harvest. The remaining animals had small localized tumors that could only be observed histopathologically. There was preservation of the lens and globe. In marked contrast to the untreated control animals, all of the treated animals had normal activity and appetite and were not in any visible discomfort.

Histologic analysis of the enucleated eyes ( Fig. 2A and C ) of the untreated animals showed large globe-filling tumors (20 of 20) and diffuse tumor invasion of the choroid and the optic nerve (7 of 20). In contrast, the eyes of treated animals had a reduced intraocular tumor burden with some choroidal scarring suggesting tumor regression ( Fig. 2B and D). Focal invasion of the choroid by viable tumor was present in only 1 of 20 eyes examined (P = 0.017). The presence of residual intraocular tumors may be attributed to the inability of SVV-001 to replicate in the vitreous. To test this possibility, SVV-001 was incubated with Y79 cells in the presence of vitreous in vitro. SVV-001 killed Y79 cells in the presence or absence of vitreous, suggesting that this hypothesis is unlikely. Because the vitreous seeds do not have a blood supply but grow as free-floating tumors, it is possible that the virus cannot gain access to the tumor. Children with retinoblastoma have primary retinal tumors that are vascular ( 17, 18); therefore, it is possible that peripheral injection of SVV-001 could be therapeutic for these primary tumors. Because of the lack of a suitable animal model to test this possibility, the answer to this question will have to wait for a clinical trial in children.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Ocular response of retinoblastoma tumors to SVV-001 in a murine model in vivo. Y79 retinoblastoma cells (2 × 104) were injected into the vitreous of 40 Rag2 immune-incompetent mice. The mice were monitored weekly for tumor growth. At 3 or 5 wk after injection of the retinoblastoma cells, SVV-001 (1 × 1013 vp/kg) was injected into the tail veins of 20 mice. Two weeks after SVV-001 injections, eyes and brain tissues were harvested and examined. The harvested tissues were fixed in formalin and sectioned. Slides were stained with H&E and examined microscopically. A, untreated animal showing large tumor protruding from the orbit and massive replacement of ocular structures by tumor when examined microscopically under low power. The optic nerve has been invaded with tumor. Magnification, ×4. B, animal treated with the oncolytic virus had intraocular tumor only when examined microscopically under low power. The optic nerve was free of tumor. Magnification, ×4. C, untreated animal showing diffuse choroid and optic nerve invasion and replacement of ocular structures by tumor (invasive tumor: 7 of 20 animals). Magnification, ×10. D, oncolytic virus–treated animal showing intraocular tumor only. A choroidal scar without tumor can be observed (invasive tumor: 1 of 20 animals; P = 0.017). Magnification, ×10.

Histologic analysis of the brains of 4 of 20 xenograft mice that were not treated with SVV-001 showed tumor invading the subarachnoid space ( Fig. 3A ). No tumor (0 of 20) was detected in the brains of mice that received SVV-001 treatment ( Fig. 3B). Although current imaging techniques do not allow us to say that tumor is present in the optic nerve or brain before beginning therapy, the absence of tumor in the optic nerve and brains of any of the SVV-001–treated animals suggests that systemically administered SVV-001 is able to infect tumors located in the CNS. No viral cytopathic changes or necrosis were observed in the brains, eyes, or any other organs.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Absence of brain metastases in a SVV-001–treated animal. A, untreated animal showing metastatic tumor in the subarachnoid space of the brain (metastatic tumor: 4 of 20 animals). Magnification, ×4. B, normal mouse brain from a treated animal. No tumor was observed in the brains of any of the oncolytic virus–treated animals (metastatic tumor: 0 of 20 animals; P = 0.036). Magnification, ×4.

The development of successful treatment and prevention of metastatic disease in children with retinoblastoma is of paramount importance. Because of its lack of apparent pathogenicity even in an immunodeficient host and its activity against retinoblastoma both in vitro and in vivo, SVV-001 is an attractive candidate for the treatment and/or prevention of metastatic retinoblastoma.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: Knights Templar Eye Research Foundation (L. Wadhwa), The Clayton Foundation for Research (R.L. Hurwitz), The Retina Research Foundation (R.L. Hurwitz), and NIH grant P20 CA103698 (R.L. Hurwitz).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Vien Holcombe for technical assistance and Dr. Malcolm Brenner for his critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

    • Received June 25, 2007.
    • Revision received September 14, 2007.
    • Accepted September 28, 2007.
    • ©2007 American Association for Cancer Research.

    References

    1. ↵
      Devesa S. The incidence of retinoblastoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80: 263–5.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      MacCarthy A, Draper GJ, Steliarova-Foucher E, Kingston JE. Retinoblastoma incidence and survival in European children (1978-1997). Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 2092–102.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      Frank SA. Age-specific incidence of inherited versus sporadic cancers: a test of the multistage theory of carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 1071–5.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Shields CL, Shields JA, Baez KA, Cater J, De Potter PV. Choroidal invasion of retinoblastoma: metastatic potential and clinical risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 544–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      Shields CL, Shields JA, Baez K, et al. Optic nerve invasion of retinoblastoma: metastatic potential and clinical risk factors. Cancer 1994; 73: 692–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      Kremens B, Wieland R, Reinhard H, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in children with retinoblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31: 281–4.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wilson MW, Haik BG, et al. Treatment of metastatic retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1237–40.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. Matsubara H, Makimoto A, Higa T, et al. A multidisciplinary treatment strategy that includes high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic retinoblastoma without CNS involvement. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 763–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      Leal-Leal CA, Rivera-Luna R, Flores-Rojo M, Juarez-Echenique JC, Ordaz JC, Amador-Zarco J. Survival in extra-orbital metastatic retinoblastoma:treatment results. Clin Transl Oncol 2006; 8: 39–44.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      Liu TC, Galanis E, Kirn D. Clinical trial results with oncolytic virotherapy: a century of promise, a decade of progress. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007; 4: 101–17.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      Reddy PS, Burroughs KD, Hales LM, et al. Seneca Valley Virus: a systemically deliverable oncolytic picornavirus for the treatment of neuroendocrine cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99.
    12. ↵
      Chevez-Barrios P, Hurwitz MY, Louie K, et al. Metastatic and nonmetastatic models of retinoblastoma. Am J Pathol 2000; 157: 1405–12.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      Windle JJ, Albert DM, O'Brien JM, et al. Retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Nature 1990; 343: 665–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      Syed NA, Nork TM, Poulsen GL, Riis RC, George C, Albert DM. Retinoblastoma in a dog. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115: 758–63.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      al Ubaidi MR, Font RL, Quiambao AB, et al. Bilateral retinal and brain tumors in transgenic mice expressing simian virus 40 large T antigen under control of the human interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein promoter. J Cell Biol 1992; 119: 1681–7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      Zhang J, Gray J, Wu L, et al. Rb regulates proliferation and rod photoreceptor development in the mouse retina. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 351–60.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      Datta BN. DNA coating of blood vessels in retinoblastomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1974; 62: 94–6.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      Sang DN, Albert DM, Kuo PK. Retinoblastoma: clinical observations and histopathological study. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1982; 22: 73–102.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Cancer Research: 67 (22)
    November 2007
    Volume 67, Issue 22
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover
    • November 15 Cancer Research Highlights

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

    NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Treatment of Invasive Retinoblastoma in a Murine Model Using an Oncolytic Picornavirus
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
    (Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Treatment of Invasive Retinoblastoma in a Murine Model Using an Oncolytic Picornavirus
    Lalita Wadhwa, Mary Y. Hurwitz, Patricia Chévez-Barrios and Richard L. Hurwitz
    Cancer Res November 15 2007 (67) (22) 10653-10656; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2352

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Treatment of Invasive Retinoblastoma in a Murine Model Using an Oncolytic Picornavirus
    Lalita Wadhwa, Mary Y. Hurwitz, Patricia Chévez-Barrios and Richard L. Hurwitz
    Cancer Res November 15 2007 (67) (22) 10653-10656; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2352
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Materials and Methods
      • Results and Discussion
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • ATM Loss and Therapeutic Sensitivities in Prostate Cancer
    • Multimodal Molecular Imaging of the Tumor Microenvironment
    • Contribution of EMT Mechanism in Breast Tumor Metastasis
    Show more Priority Reports
    • Home
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

    Articles

    • Online First
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts

    Info for

    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians

    About Cancer Research

    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    AACR logo

    Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

    Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
    Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
    Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
    American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

    Advertisement