Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Reviews

Breast Cancer: Should Gastrointestinal Bacteria Be on Our Radar Screen?

Varada P. Rao, Theofilos Poutahidis, James G. Fox and Susan E. Erdman
Varada P. Rao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Theofilos Poutahidis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James G. Fox
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan E. Erdman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3468 Published February 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Breast Cancer and Gastrointestinal Bacteria - March 15, 2007

Abstract

Anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics alter the risk of breast cancer in women, but roles for bacteria and inflammation in breast malignancies are poorly understood. A recent study in mice suggests that intestinal bacteria can trigger mammary carcinoma. The mechanisms involved in this effect suggest that dysregulated host immune responses to enteric bacteria can influence the development of extraintestinal cancers, highlighting the opportunities for prevention and treatment aimed at promoting intestinal homeostasis. [Cancer Res 2007;67(3):847–50]

  • TNF-α
  • Helicobacter hepaticus
  • breast cancer
  • regulatory T cells
  • IL-10
  • ApcMin/+ mice

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy, accounting for 30% of all cancers diagnosed in women each year ( 1). The risk of developing breast cancer is increasing at a rate of 4% annually ( 2). Although it is widely accepted that breast cancer risk is based on genetic predisposition, only 5% to 10% of the total breast cancer incidence has been attributed directly to heritable risk factors. Multiple factors are likely to contribute to breast cancer incidence, but all recognized risk factors together account for only 40% of the variability in incidence ( 3), leaving the majority of risk factors to be determined.

Recent studies on the effects of anti-inflammatory drugs suggest that inflammation is a key contributor to development of breast cancer in humans ( 4). Preclinical and clinical data suggest that overexpression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and increased production of prostaglandins contribute to cancer development at many sites including breast ( 5). Clinical trials with COX-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have shown a reduction in both incidence and invasive pathology of breast cancer. Prolonged immune activation due to pathogenic bacterial infections, such as Helicobacter pylori, in people clearly contributes to elevated COX-2 production and cancer in susceptible individuals ( 6). Although inflammatory mediators produced during chronic bacterial infections are likely to affect breast cancer incidence and pathology, no study has directly examined this issue until recently. And precisely how mediators of chronic inflammation enhance the risk of developing breast cancer in women remains to be elucidated.

Malignancies induced in mice after exposure to external agents such as bacteria provide valuable model systems to interrogate cancer pathogenesis otherwise not feasible in humans. For example, murine models have greatly facilitated our current understanding of H. pylori infection–associated gastric cancer in humans ( 7). Explicit requirements for bacteria in carcinogenesis have been shown in highly cancer-prone mutant mice that fail to develop cancer under germ-free housing conditions. Use of immunodeficient mice has revealed pivotal roles for cells of innate immunity in colorectal cancer due to chronic bacterial infection with Helicobacter hepaticus ( 8)—an enteric pathogen of mice closely related to H. pylori. Anti-inflammatory CD4+ regulatory lymphocytes, crucial players in the induction of peripheral tolerance to self and foreign antigens, abrogate Helicobacter-triggered inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; refs. 8, 9) and IBD-associated colorectal cancer ( 8) by down-regulating host inflammatory responses triggered by intestinal bacteria. Over the years, the data accumulated from mouse models have led to proposals to augment regulatory T cells to treat inflammatory disorders such as IBD in people ( 10). Although inflammation clearly contributes to breast malignancy in women ( 4), murine models of inflammation-associated breast neoplasia have been lacking ( 11).

Pathogenic Gut Bacteria: Can They Trigger Breast Cancer?

During investigations of colorectal cancer, we serendipitously discovered that orogastric infection of C57BL/6 ApcMin/+ (Min) mice with H. hepaticus bacteria rapidly promotes extraintestinal tumors in mammary tissue ( 12). As a result of a mutation in the Apc gene, Min mice are genetically predisposed to epithelial tumors of intestine ( 13) and are highly responsive to COX-2 and prostaglandin inhibitor therapy ( 14). Although genetically predisposed to mammary carcinoma, Min mice on a C57BL/6 strain background rarely develop mammary tumors under standard housing conditions ( 15). However, within 4 to 6 weeks of infection with H. hepaticus, more than two thirds of 12-week-old female Min mice develop mammary adenosquamous carcinoma. Studies using Rag2-deficient Min mice lacking lymphocytes have determined that breast cancer arises from intestinal bacteria–triggered innate immune events requiring proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α ( 12, 16). TNF-α has established roles in cancer progression in bowel, liver, breast, and other sites in mice ( 17, 18). The finding that H. hepaticus induces TNF-α expression ( 12) even in IBD-resistant mouse strains ( 8, 9) raises the possibility that overt IBD may not necessarily accompany breast cancer in susceptible women. Importantly, our data linking pathogenic Helicobacter bacterial infection and increased TNF-α with mammary tumors in mice match prior findings in women with elevated TNF-α levels and poor breast cancer outcome, and also correlate with the lower risk of breast cancer seen in women treated with anti-inflammatory drugs ( 4). Our preliminary data showing that Campylobacter jejuni, a common enteric pathogen in humans, has similar oncogenic potential in mice warrants further study.

Adenosquamous carcinoma in C57BL/6 Min and Rag2-deficient Min mice seems to arise in areas of inflammation from hyperplastic epithelia of the mammary ducts and ductules (see Fig. 1 ), matching features of breast malignancies in women involving the terminal ductal lobular unit ( 11). Orogastric infection with H. hepaticus induces low-grade and high-grade hyperplasias of mammary epithelia and these changes are accompanied by periductal accumulation of small numbers of mast cells, neutrophils, and macrophages in infected Rag2-deficient Min mice, suggesting that these cells may have roles in the initiation of tumorigenesis. A spectrum of precancerous mammary lesions analogous to those observed in women is evident in female Rag2-deficient Min and Min mice; however, the progression of hyperplasia to mammary intraepithelial neoplasia in Min mice has concurrent squamous metaplasia with or without formation of keratin. The squamous metaplasia observed may be a secondary species-related phenomenon because hyperplastic repair processes in response to inflammation are often accompanied by squamous metaplasia in the mammary epithelia in mice ( 11). Squamous metaplasia is less frequent in H. hepaticus–induced mammary tumors in Rag2-deficient Min mice ( 12), when compared with Min mice receiving proinflammatory CD4+ effector T lymphocytes ( 16), perhaps providing important clues about adaptive immunity in breast carcinogenesis in women.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A proposed model of microbially induced breast cancer in women. Microbial flora of mucosal surfaces outnumber total cells in the human body and have essential roles in the development of a competent healthy immune system. However, humans chronically infected with pathogenic gastrointestinal bacteria often develop inflammation and cancer. The compromised intestinal epithelial barrier in individuals with chronic gut infections leads to submucosal translocation of bacteria thereby triggering persistent activation of cells of immune inflammatory response including dendritic cells, macrophages, granulocytes, and lymphocytes, culminating in a systemic inflammatory response that may lead to cancer at extraintestinal sites such as the breast. In immunocompetent hosts, regulatory T cells expand in response to the microbial challenge and down-regulate inflammatory events to help restore gut epithelial homeostasis. In hosts with immune dysregulation, inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α are produced in excessive quantities and the downstream activities are poorly regulated favoring tumorigenesis. Mammary gland carcinoma arises in mice infected with H. hepaticus bacteria from the foci of inflammation and hyperplastic epithelia in mammary ducts and ductules. The spectrum of morphologic intermediates from normal mammary gland (A) to preneoplastic (B and C) and neoplastic (D) states are shown: ductal proliferation (B) with focal alveolar hyperplasia (B, inset), early adenosquamous metaplasia (C) with ductal carcinoma in situ (mammary intraepithelial neoplasia) and apocrine cytoplasmic differentiation (C, inset), and finally adenocarcinoma (D). H&E staining. Magnification, 40× (A–D); 400× (insets).

Precisely how gastrointestinal bacteria may trigger carcinogenesis in the mammae of Min mice is not yet clear. Mammary lymphadenopathy is evident within days of gastric gavage with H. hepaticus in C57BL/6 Rag2-deficient Min mice, matching earlier data in 129 Rag2-deficient showing systemic immune activation and splenomegaly after infection with H. hepaticus ( 9, 19), which indicates that enteric bacterial infection triggers a systemic innate immune inflammatory response. Studies are under way to determine whether additional events, such as translocation of intestinal bacteria to mammary tissue, may explain the rapid onset of mammary cancer in these genetically susceptible mice.

Anti-inflammatory Lymphocytes: Can They Prevent Breast Cancer?

CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells constitute a naturally occurring potent lymphocyte subset of thymic origin with critical roles in induction of peripheral tolerance to self and foreign antigens ( 20). These cells are potent suppressors of the activation and proliferation of other CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as cells of innate immunity, and contribute to immune homeostasis in subjects with autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory disease, and cancer ( 10). The molecular basis of their suppressive activity has not been fully elucidated ( 20). Although there is general consensus that regulatory cells are essential in maintaining immune homeostasis through down-regulation of physiologic and pathologic immune responses, their roles in the progression of inflammation-associated cancers are less clear.

Murine models of IBD have convincingly shown that anti-inflammatory CD4+ regulatory lymphocyte subsets suppress destructive host immune responses during pathogenic intestinal bacterial infections, such as with H. hepaticus in mice ( 8, 9). We have shown, using a widely applied adoptive cell transfer paradigm in mice ( 10), that CD4+CD45RBloCD25+ regulatory T cells also suppress H. hepaticus–induced IBD-associated colorectal cancer in 129 Rag2-deficient mice ( 8). Likewise, adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells inhibits mammary tumorigenesis attributable to H. hepaticus infection in female Min mice ( 12). However, the potent antineoplastic efficacy of regulatory T cells is not restricted to H. hepaticus–triggered tumors alone because these cells equally suppressed the spontaneous development of intestinal polyps in C57BL/6 Min mice ( 21) and mammary carcinogenesis induced by proinflammatory CD4+ effector T-lymphocyte transfer in female Min mice ( 16). Supplementation with regulatory T cells in Min mice suppresses expression of COX-2 ( 21), previously linked with several cancers in humans ( 5), and also normalizes downstream expression of the c-myc oncogene ( 16), previously linked with breast cancer in women ( 11). It is probable that these antineoplastic effects of regulatory T cells, as previously shown in 129 Rag2-deficient mice ( 9, 22), are achieved through down-regulation of inflammatory cytokines, rather than by decreasing pathogenic bacterial counts within the bowel. Regulatory T cells may also function by inhibiting systemic trafficking of inflammatory cells ( 9) or perhaps bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells ( 23), as the latter have been recently shown to contribute to carcinoma ( 23). These possibilities remain to be explored in our future studies.

Modern Hygiene Practices: A Double-Edged Sword

From the above discussion, it is clear that pathogenic gut bacteria may pose a trigger for breast cancer. However, this seems to be only half the story. It does not explain why breast cancer risk is increasing in developed countries with more rigorous hygiene practices, or answer how chronic use of prescribed antibiotics enhances the risk for breast cancer in women ( 4). The “hygiene hypothesis” is based on the observation that early childhood infections reduce the incidence of allergies ( 24). A later counter-regulatory model of the hygiene hypothesis, forwarded by Wills-Karp et al. ( 24), postulates that microbial infections have a beneficial role in the developing immune system and that the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin 10 (IL-10), produced by cells of both innate and adaptive immune systems during bacterial infections, has suppressive and feedback inhibitory effects on autoimmunity and allergy and is central to immune homeostasis ( 24). Following this reasoning, we hypothesize that the reduced infectious burden due to stringent hygiene practices and excessive antibiotic use in developed countries may lead to weakening of this interleukin (IL)-10 feedback inhibitory loop and, thus, predispose susceptible individuals to develop more frequently chronic inflammatory diseases and inflammation-associated cancers. Therefore, in this context, bacterial infections are not necessarily entirely adversarial and may impart some long-term health benefits by reducing risk for chronic debilitating diseases, such as autoimmunity and cancer, later in life.

Recent experimental evidence ( 25) suggests that microbial infections in mice up-regulate the function of regulatory T cells and their ability to produce IL-10. Lymphocyte titration experiments in our laboratory ( 12) also show an IL-10–dependent increase in the antineoplastic potency of regulatory T cells from mice with prior exposure to H. hepaticus bacteria. Importantly, the enhanced antineoplastic potency extends protection against tumors arising in Helicobacter-free Min mice ( 12) and also suggests that prior exposures to intestinal bacteria may reduce risk for carcinoma in humans arising from other inflammation-associated disorders in later life. Whether the increased protection against cancer involves only regulatory T cells of thymic origin ( 19) or also peripherally recruited IL-10–dependent regulatory subsets is not well understood. We speculate that immune competency may be suboptimal in individuals with more stringent hygiene practices, and when combined with other known risk factors of Western lifestyle this contributes to the paradoxical increase in inflammation-associated cancers seen in developed countries. Likewise, antibiotics may deplete intestinal bacteria directly or indirectly essential for enteric homeostasis, thereby leading to increased risk of breast cancer in women undergoing chronic antimicrobial therapy ( 4). Interestingly, it seems that the long-term health benefits imparted by intestinal bacterial infections early in life may also be achieved in other ways. Recently, probiotic bacteria were shown to reduce IBD in mice through an IL-10–dependent regulatory lymphocyte–mediated mechanism ( 26), and clinical trials in humans using IL-10–expressing probiotic organisms are under way. Taken together, these data suggest that elimination of bacteria from the environment may have detrimental effects on the ability of the immune system to constructively regulate subsequent systemic inflammatory responses. The use of probiotic bacteria may provide the needed immune stimulatory input while minimizing interaction with pathogenic organisms.

The extraintestinal outcome of the interplay between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory immune mediators in the bowel is readily shown in female Min mice that develop mammary tumors after infection with H. hepaticus bacteria. Although Min mice have both B and T lymphocytes, they show accelerated thymic involution ( 27) and develop lymphopenia at 3 months of age, including loss of regulatory lymphocytes ( 28). As a result, the persistent and unopposed activation of the remaining lymphocytes by H. hepaticus infection culminates in a state of chronic inflammation that exerts carcinogenic effects on mammary glandular epithelium, which may not have been evident in mice with a competent immune system. Similarly, a single injection of 3 × 103 proinflammatory effector T cells triggers development of mammary tumors predominantly adenosquamous carcinoma in nature, whereas cotransfer with anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells from syngeneic wild-type cell donors completely prevents tumorigenesis ( 16). Unpublished data showing that antibody-mediated depletion of CD25+ cells significantly hastens the onset of mammary tumors in 2-month-old female Min mice corroborate our prior work and suggest that regulatory T cells may possess previously unrecognized roles in the prevention of breast cancer. In addition, preliminary studies reveal that a single dose of 1.0 × 103 regulatory T cells can enhance the longevity of Min mice from their average life span of 4 months to up to 1 year of age. In general, however, the roles for regulatory T cells in cancer progression are far from clear. Data from many other mouse models suggest that regulatory T cells may dampen the protective CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses important in the elimination of neoplastic cells. Despite strong experimental data accumulated from mouse models in this regard, attempts of cancer immunotherapy and cancer vaccines in humans have thus far been disappointing ( 29).

Treading a Fine Line between Protection and Pathology

The possibility that dysregulated host immune responses to enteric bacteria lead to cancer in extraintestinal organs highlights the need to better understand factors that regulate immune and epithelial homeostasis in bowel and breast. It is clear that regulatory lymphocytes have evolved to play a sophisticated balancing act of ignoring the host protective acute inflammatory response during infections and later regaining suppressive roles that limit deleterious pathologic sequellae of chronic inflammation. These inherent homeostatic properties of a competent immune system can be targeted for optimization in population-based approaches for cancer prevention using probiotics or vaccines. Selective enhancement of host beneficial anti-inflammatory activities may offer potent yet less toxic means when compared with traditional cancer treatment approaches such as radiation and chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to gain better understanding of the interplay between microbes and cells of innate and adaptive immunity, which may help us to selectively expand or deplete relevant cells and their biological activities. The challenge now is to integrate findings from basic science with those from clinical studies, so we can sufficiently understand the cross-talk between microbial and immune homeostatic mechanisms that govern our health in the bowel to achieve optimal protection from cancer in the breast and other sites.

Footnotes

    • Received September 22, 2006.
    • Revision received November 6, 2006.
    • Accepted November 21, 2006.
    • ©2007 American Association for Cancer Research.

    References

    1. ↵
      Bange J, Zwick E, Ullrich A. Molecular targets for breast cancer therapy and prevention. Nat Med 2001; 7: 548–52.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      ACS cancer facts and figures 2004. US cancer fact and figures 2004.
    3. ↵
      Madigan MP, Ziegler RG, Benichou J, Byrne C, Hoover RN. Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1681–5.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Ness RB, Cauley JA. Antibiotics and breast cancer—what's the meaning of this? JAMA 2004; 291: 880–1.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      Wang D, Dubois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2: a potential target in breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2004; 31: 64–73.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      Moss SF, Blaser MJ. Mechanisms of disease: inflammation and the origins of cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2005; 2: 90–7; quiz 1 p following 113.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      Fox JG, Wang TC. Inflammation, atrophy and gastric cancer. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 60–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      Erdman SE, Poutahidis T, Tomczak M, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes inhibit microbially induced colon cancer in Rag2-deficient mice. Am J Pathol 2003; 162: 691–702.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      Maloy KJ, Salaun L, Cahill R, Dougan G, Saunders NJ, Powrie F. CD4+CD25+ T(R) cells suppress innate immune pathology through cytokine-dependent mechanisms. J Exp Med 2003; 197: 111–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      Powrie F, Maloy KJ. Immunology. Regulating the regulators. Science 2003; 299: 1030–1.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      Cardiff RD, Anver MR, Gusterson BA, et al. The mammary pathology of genetically engineered mice: the consensus report and recommendations from the Annapolis meeting. Oncogene 2000; 19: 968–88.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      Rao VP, Poutahidis T, Ge Z, et al. Innate immune inflammatory response against enteric bacteria Helicobacter hepaticus induces mammary adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 7395–400.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      Moser AR, Pitot HC, Dove WF. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science 1990; 247: 322–4.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      Corpet DE, Pierre F. Point: from animal models to prevention of colon cancer. Systematic review of chemoprevention in min mice and choice of the model system. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 391–400.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      Moser AR, Mattes EM, Dove WF, Lindstrom MJ, Haag JD, Gould MN. ApcMin, a mutation in the murine Apc gene, predisposes to mammary carcinomas and focal alveolar hyperplasias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 8977–81.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      Rao VP, Poutahidis T, Ge Z, et al. Proinflammatory CD4+ CD45RB(hi) lymphocytes promote mammary and intestinal carcinogenesis in Apc(Min/+) mice. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 57–61.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      Karin M, Lawrence T, Nizet V. Innate immunity gone awry: linking microbial infections to chronic inflammation and cancer. Cell 2006; 124: 823–35.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      Balkwill F, Coussens LM. Cancer: an inflammatory link. Nature 2004; 431: 405–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      Maloy KJ, Antonelli LR, Lefevre M, Powrie F. Cure of innate intestinal immune pathology by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Immunol Lett 2005; 97: 189–92.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      Sakaguchi S, Ono M, Setoguchi R, et al. Foxp3CD25CD4 natural regulatory T cells in dominant self-tolerance and autoimmune disease. Immunol Rev 2006; 212: 8–27.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      Erdman SE, Sohn JJ, Rao VP, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory lymphocytes induce regression of intestinal tumors in ApcMin/+ mice. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 3998–4004.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      Erdman SE, Rao VP, Poutahidis T, et al. CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory lymphocytes require interleukin 10 to interrupt colon carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 6042–50.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      Houghton J, Stoicov C, Nomura S, et al. Gastric cancer originating from bone marrow-derived cells. Science 2004; 306: 1568–71.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      Wills-Karp M, Santeliz J, Karp CL. The germless theory of allergic disease: revisiting the hygiene hypothesis. Nat Rev Immunol 2001; 1: 69–75.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      Belkaid Y, Rouse BT. Natural regulatory T cells in infectious disease. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 353–60.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      Di Giacinto C, Marinaro M, Sanchez M, Strober W, Boirivant M. Probiotics ameliorate recurrent Th1-mediated murine colitis by inducing IL-10 and IL-10-dependent TGF-β-bearing regulatory cells. J Immunol 2005; 174: 3237–46.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      Coletta PL, Muller AM, Jones EA, et al. Lymphodepletion in the ApcMin/+ mouse model of intestinal tumorigenesis. Blood 2004; 103: 1050–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    28. ↵
      Gounari F, Chang R, Cowan J, et al. Loss of adenomatous polyposis coli gene function disrupts thymic development. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 800–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      Pure E, Allison JP, Schreiber RD. Breaking down the barriers to cancer immunotherapy. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 1207–10.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Cancer Research: 67 (3)
    February 2007
    Volume 67, Issue 3
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

    NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Breast Cancer: Should Gastrointestinal Bacteria Be on Our Radar Screen?
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
    (Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Breast Cancer: Should Gastrointestinal Bacteria Be on Our Radar Screen?
    Varada P. Rao, Theofilos Poutahidis, James G. Fox and Susan E. Erdman
    Cancer Res February 1 2007 (67) (3) 847-850; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3468

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Breast Cancer: Should Gastrointestinal Bacteria Be on Our Radar Screen?
    Varada P. Rao, Theofilos Poutahidis, James G. Fox and Susan E. Erdman
    Cancer Res February 1 2007 (67) (3) 847-850; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3468
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Pathogenic Gut Bacteria: Can They Trigger Breast Cancer?
      • Anti-inflammatory Lymphocytes: Can They Prevent Breast Cancer?
      • Modern Hygiene Practices: A Double-Edged Sword
      • Treading a Fine Line between Protection and Pathology
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Shaping Reproductive Tract Cancers by PAX8
    • Intron Retention in Cancer
    • Microbiome and Cancer
    Show more Reviews
    • Home
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

    Articles

    • Online First
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts

    Info for

    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians

    About Cancer Research

    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    AACR logo

    Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

    Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
    Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
    Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
    American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

    Advertisement