Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Distinct Genetic Signatures among Pilocytic Astrocytomas Relate to Their Brain Region Origin

Mukesh K. Sharma, David B. Mansur, Guido Reifenberger, Arie Perry, Jeffrey R. Leonard, Kenneth D. Aldape, Meredith G. Albin, Ryan J. Emnett, Simon Loeser, Mark A. Watson, Rakesh Nagarajan and David H. Gutmann
Mukesh K. Sharma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Mansur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guido Reifenberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arie Perry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey R. Leonard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth D. Aldape
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meredith G. Albin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan J. Emnett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon Loeser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Watson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh Nagarajan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David H. Gutmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0973 Published February 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Hierarchical cluster analysis of patient PA specimens. Gene expression data were filtered, z-score normalized (SD of 1 across all samples for each gene), and subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis as described in the text. The dendrogram on the left displays the relationship of the samples based on their global pattern of gene expression. On the right of the dendrogram is a “heat map” representing gene expression, with each of the 41 samples represented in a row, each probe set represented as a vertical line, and the relative expression of any one gene in any one sample in continuous color scale from low (yellow) to high (dark blue) expression. Age of patient, gender, tumor location, additional features (comment), and NF1 status (Y, NF1-PA; N, non–NF1-PA or sporadic PA) are provided for each of the PA samples studied.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Genes differentially expressed in NF1-PAs and sporadic PAs. A, genes differentially expressed in NF1-PAs and sporadic PAs based on SAM at false discovery rate of 0 and a q value of 0. Genes are listed in descending order of significance based on the score assigned by SAM. Genes shown in bold were used for independent validation experiments. B, TAK1-like protein (left), similar to SRGAP2 (middle) and SLC1A3 (right) mRNA expression, was measured by real-time reverse transcription PCR in 10 sporadic PAs and 5 NF1-PAs. Increased TAK1-like protein, similar to SRGAP2 and SLC1A3 mRNA expression, was observed in NF1-PAs when compared with sporadic PAs. C, DCAMKL1 (left), OBFC1 (middle), and MASS1 (right) mRNA expression was measured in an independent set of 10 sporadic PAs and 7 NF1-PAs. Increased DCAMKL1, OBFC1, and MASS1 mRNA expression was observed in NF1-PAs compared with sporadic PAs.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Genes differentially expressed in supratentorial and posterior fossa PAs. A, LHX2 (left) and NR2E1 (right) mRNA expression was measured by real-time reverse transcription PCR in an independent series of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded supratentorial (ST-PA; n = 10) and posterior fossa (PF-PA; n = 9) PAs. Increased LHX2 and NR2E1 mRNA expression was observed in supratentorial PAs compared with posterior fossa PAs. B, immunohistochemical analysis of PAX3 protein expression in supratentorial and posterior fossa PAs. PAX3 protein expression is shown for a representative posterior fossa PA (left) and a representative supratentorial PA (right). A summary of the PAX3 staining results in posterior fossa and supratentorial PAs from an independent series of samples is shown in the table. The proportion of posterior fossa tumors immunoreactive for PAX3 protein expression was statistically different from that observed in supratentorial tumors (P = 0.020, Fisher's exact test). C, immunohistochemical analysis of LHX2 protein expression in supratentorial and posterior fossa PAs. LHX2 protein expression is shown for a representative posterior fossa PA (left) and a representative supratentorial PA (right). A summary of the LHX2 staining results in posterior fossa and supratentorial PAs from an independent series of samples is shown in the table. The proportion of supratentorial tumors positive for LHX2 protein expression was statistically different from that observed in posterior fossa tumors (P = 0.005, Fisher's exact test). Bar, 50 μm. Arrows, nuclear LHX2 immunoreactivity.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Murine brain, astrocyte, and neural stem cell mRNA expression of genes differentially expressed in PAs. A, analysis of the differentially expressed PA genes ( Table 1) in mouse brain and astrocytes. Genes with increased mRNA expression in supratentorial or posterior fossa PAs and neocortical (CTX) or cerebellar (CB) astrocytes are presented. Statistically significant differences (P values by Benjamini-Hochberg–corrected Student's t test) are included for both the original PA microarray data and the astrocyte microarray data. B, LHX2, NR2E1, IRX2, and PAX3 mRNA expression was examined in PN1 and PN30 mouse neocortex and cerebellum (upper), in primary PN1 neocortical and cerebellar astrocytes (middle), as well as in PN1 neocortical and cerebellar neural stem cells (NSC; lower). In each analysis, mRNA levels were normalized to neocortex, neocortical astrocytes, or neocortical neural stem cells (relative value = 1.0). *, P < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Ependymoma mRNA expression of the genes differentially expressed in PA. A, analysis of the differentially expressed PA genes ( Table 1) in supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas. Genes with increased mRNA expression in supratentorial (ST-PA) or posterior fossa (PF-PA) PAs and supratentorial (ST) or posterior fossa (PF) ependymomas are presented. Statistically significant differences (P values by Benjamini-Hochberg–corrected Student's t test) are included for both the original PA microarray data and the ependymoma microarray data. B, immunohistochemical analysis of PAX3 protein expression in supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas. PAX3 protein expression is shown for a representative posterior fossa ependymoma (left) and a representative supratentorial ependymoma (right). The immunohistochemistry results for PAX3 protein expression in posterior fossa and supratentorial ependymoma samples are shown in the table. The proportion of posterior fossa tumors with tumoral PAX3 immunoreactivity was statistically different from that observed in supratentorial tumors (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). C, immunohistochemical analysis of LHX2 protein expression in supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas. LHX2 protein expression is shown for a representative posterior fossa ependymoma (left) and a representative supratentorial ependymoma (right; arrowheads). The immunohistochemistry results for LHX2 protein expression in posterior fossa and supratentorial ependymoma samples are shown in the table. The proportion of supratentorial tumors with LHX2 immunoreactivity was statistically different from that observed in posterior fossa tumors (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). Bar, 50 μm.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Genes differentially expressed in supratentorial and posterior fossa PA

    Unique probe identifierUniGene IDUniGene gene nameUniGene gene symbolSAM scoreFold change (average ST-PA / average PF-PA)
    206140_atHs.445265LIM homeobox 2LHX29.2316.05
    211219_s_atHs.445265LIM homeobox 2LHX27.807.27
    241700_atHs.458973Zinc finger homeodomain 4ZFHX46.893.49
    223582_atHs.482811Monogenic, audiogenic seizure susceptibility 1 homologue (mouse)MASS16.485.41
    205080_atHs.436538Retinoic acid receptor, βRARB6.152.49
    236277_atHs.390616p21 (CDKN1A)-activated kinase 3PAK36.042.61
    207443_atHs.157688Nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group E, member 1NR2E15.819.16
    206584_atHs.69328Lymphocyte antigen 96LY965.583.02
    218737_atHs.144055Sno, strawberry notch homologue 1 (Drosophila)SBNO15.541.73
    222811_atHs.72782Hypothetical protein FLJ11171FLJ111715.501.63
    1561985_atHs.335754Chromosome 14 open reading frame 39C14orf395.3416.33
    1562940_atHs.568083cDNA clone IMAGE:53016835.331.68
    228347_atHs.558398Sine oculis homeobox homologue 1 (Drosophila)SIX15.329.53
    214830_atHs.200738Solute carrier family 38, member 6SLC38A65.301.82
    226339_atHs.21187TruB pseudouridine (ψ) synthase homologue 1 (E. coli)TRUB15.281.72
    204205_atHs.474853Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide like 3GAPOBEC3G5.122.15
    201744_s_atHs.406475LumicanLUM5.075.08
    205905_s_atHs.549053MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence AMICA5.031.84
    227038_atHs.48343Hypothetical protein MGC26963MGC269635.022.46
    207181_s_atHs.9216Caspase 7, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidaseCASP74.971.64
    204523_atHs.181552Zinc finger protein 140 (clone pHZ-39)ZNF1404.971.64
    207250_atHs.194756Sine oculis homeobox homologue 6 (Drosophila)SIX64.969.41
    227059_atHs.444329Glypican 6GPC64.922.51
    214078_atHs.390616p21 (CDKN1A)-activated kinase 3PAK34.902.47
    206634_atHs.503113Sine oculis homeobox homologue 3 (Drosophila)SIX34.898.28
    226117_atHs.310640TRAF-interacting protein with a forkhead-associated domainTIFA4.811.77
    202352_s_atHs.4295Proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 12PSMD124.811.34
    201659_s_atHs.372616ADP-ribosylation factor–like 1ARL14.781.69
    213172_atHs.79170Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 9TTC94.743.16
    214770_atHs.446291Macrophage scavenger receptor 1MSR14.742.43
    231666_atHs.42146Paired box gene 3 (Waardenburg syndrome 1)PAX3−10.960.03
    228462_atHs.282089Iroquois homeobox protein 2IRX2−7.470.19
    210239_atHs.435730Iroquois homeobox protein 5IRX5−6.180.11
    1553485_atHs.350729Hypothetical protein FLJ32447FLJ32447−5.570.24
    216059_atHs.42146Paired box gene 3 (Waardenburg syndrome 1)PAX3−5.500.06
    212816_s_atHs.533013Cystathionine β-synthaseCBS−5.400.43
    203185_atHs.379970Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family 2RASSF2−5.110.47
    230463_atHs.445503Synapsin IISYN2−4.980.33
    243879_atHs.445503Synapsin IISYN2−4.750.24
    212561_atHs.501857RAB6 interacting protein 1RAB6IP1−4.610.66
    1553972_a_aHs.533013Cystathionine β-synthaseCBS−4.520.45
    • NOTE: Genes with increased or decreased expression in supratentorial PA are listed in descending order of significance based on the score assigned by SAM.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Data Sharma, et al.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Figure 1
    • Supplementary Figure 2
    • Supplementary Figure Legends 1-2
    • Supplementary Table 1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 67 (3)
February 2007
Volume 67, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distinct Genetic Signatures among Pilocytic Astrocytomas Relate to Their Brain Region Origin
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Distinct Genetic Signatures among Pilocytic Astrocytomas Relate to Their Brain Region Origin
Mukesh K. Sharma, David B. Mansur, Guido Reifenberger, Arie Perry, Jeffrey R. Leonard, Kenneth D. Aldape, Meredith G. Albin, Ryan J. Emnett, Simon Loeser, Mark A. Watson, Rakesh Nagarajan and David H. Gutmann
Cancer Res February 1 2007 (67) (3) 890-900; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0973

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Distinct Genetic Signatures among Pilocytic Astrocytomas Relate to Their Brain Region Origin
Mukesh K. Sharma, David B. Mansur, Guido Reifenberger, Arie Perry, Jeffrey R. Leonard, Kenneth D. Aldape, Meredith G. Albin, Ryan J. Emnett, Simon Loeser, Mark A. Watson, Rakesh Nagarajan and David H. Gutmann
Cancer Res February 1 2007 (67) (3) 890-900; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0973
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • HSF1-Mediated Aneuploidy in p53-Defective Cells
  • Mechanisms of Invasive Urothelial Tumorigenesis
  • Alternate mRNA 3′ Processing Characterizes Distinct Tumors
Show more Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement