Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Reviews

Fetal Microchimerism and Cancer

Janet A. Sawicki
Janet A. Sawicki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3008 Published December 2008
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The persistence of fetal stem cells with multilineage potential in women who have been pregnant, a phenomenon known as fetal microchimerism, is emerging as a potential contributing factor in certain diseases, including cancer. For example, fetal microchimerism has been implicated in autoimmune disease, wound healing, and cancer. Studies of this phenomenon may provide a novel perspective on cancer in women, including in breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. [Cancer Res 2008;68(23):9567–9]

  • fetal microchimerism
  • cancer
  • stem cells
  • cancer stem cells

Background

It has been known for some time that, following pregnancy, a few fetal cells can persist in the mother's body for long periods of time, even decades. This phenomenon is known as fetal microchimerism. The percentage of parous women that are microchimeric is not known with certainty. Assaying for the presence of the Y chromosome in women who had prior male pregnancies is a convenient way to assess microchimerism. Using this method, male cells of presumed fetal origin have been detected in 30% to 50% of women in several studies ( 1, 2). However, this number is likely to be an underestimate and is likely to increase as the sensitivity of detection methods improves and larger blood samples are tested.

Fetal cells are present in the maternal circulation and can infiltrate all tissues in the body. The role that fetal microchimerism may play in the health of parous women is only recently coming to be appreciated. In some instances, it seems that fetal cells are the root cause, or at least contribute, to disease. For example, there is now considerable evidence implicating a role for fetal cells in autoimmune diseases in women, particularly in systemic sclerosis ( 3, 4). On the other hand, there is also evidence that fetal cells may participate in the repair of injured tissues. In humans, fetal cells having the characteristics of hematopoietic, epithelial, and hepatic cells have been identified in several maternal tissues having various pathologies, suggesting that these cells have a stem cell–like multilineage potential that responds to tissue damage and/or malfunction ( 5).

The role that fetal microchimerism may play in tumor development in parous women has only recently been considered and is the focus of this minireview. A handful of studies now suggest that fetal cells have a protective function and help combat cancer in parous women. However, given their proposed dichotomous participation as causative agents in noncancerous diseases and as curative agents due to their observed stem cell properties, it seems plausible, but as yet unproven, that when placed in the right microenvironment, fetal cells may also be the cells in which tumorigenesis initiates.

Fetal Microchimeric Cells Suppress Cancer

The protective role of fetal microchimerism in suppressing tumor development in women that have been pregnant is best documented for breast cancer. In a pilot study with 82 patients, Gadi and Nelson ( 6) detected fetal microchimerism in significantly fewer women who had breast cancer than in healthy women. In a follow-up case-control study with 99 patients, these investigators confirmed the finding of the pilot study and showed additionally that the frequency of fetal cells in those breast cancer patients that tested positive for fetal cells was significantly lower than in general population control women ( 7). These authors suggest that allogeneic fetal microchimeric cells might provide immunosurveillance for breast cancer in parous women, and further that parous women that do develop breast cancer may have a reduced source of acquired allogeneic immunity. A recent study in which patients with advanced-stage chemotherapy-refractory solid tumors were treated with activated haplo-identical peripheral blood stem cells (haplo-PBSC) donated by parents or children lends support to this idea. Using HLA markers, the fetal or maternal (maternal cells in children) microchimerism status (+ or −) of patients was determined before treatment with the haplo-PBSC derived from the donor. Both the survival time and therapeutic response rate of microchimerism-positive patients were higher than in microchimerism-negative patients ( 8). In yet another study, the percentage of parous patients with malignancies that were positive for fetal microchimeric cells was significantly less than for normal parous donors ( 9). Taken together, these studies suggest that new therapies based on immunosurveillance by allogeneic fetal cells may hold promise for the treatment of cancer.

The inverse association between fetal microchimerism and breast cancer suggests that fetal cells might protect parous women from other cancers as well. To date, however, there has been very little work done to investigate this possibility. It has been known for some time that nulliparous women are at greater risk for developing bladder cancer than are parous women. The results of a recent study using a transgenic mouse model for bladder cancer suggest that pregnancy, parity, lactation, or a combination of these may play a protective role in bladder cancer by inhibiting tumor growth ( 10). The authors of this study suggest that changes in estrogen levels during pregnancy and lactation may be responsible for this protective role. Given what we now know about the protective role of fetal microchimerism in breast cancer, a study of fetal microchimerism and bladder cancer seems warranted.

In a similar vein, pregnancy at older ages has been associated with a reduced risk for ovarian cancer ( 11). Given the facts that the number of microchimeric cells in parous women declines as a function of time elapsed after pregnancy, and that ovarian cancer develops at highest frequency in postmenopausal women, it is possible that fetal microchimerism may play a protective role in ovarian cancer as well.

Microchimeric fetal cells have also been shown to cluster in lung tumors in women decades after pregnancy ( 12). Their frequency in tumors was several-fold higher in lung tumors than in surrounding healthy lung tissue. Histochemical staining to identify the nature of the tumor-associated male microchimeric cells was not done in this study. Nevertheless, the authors speculate that the fetal cells are recruited from the bone marrow to the tumor sites where they assume their role in immunosurveillance and tissue repair.

Fetal Microchimeric Cells as Cancer Stem Cells?

The role that cancer stem cells may play in the initiation and pathogenesis of cancer has been the focus of intense research in recent years. The ability to self-renew, a characteristic shared by cancer stem cells and normal stem cells residing in somatic tissues and responsible for their maintenance, has led some to suggest that tumorigenesis may initiate in normal stem cells ( 13). As a result of mutation or microenvironmental influences, these cells may lose regulatory controls that normally keep cell proliferation and differentiation in check, and cancer may develop. Given the stem cell–like potential of fetal microchimeric cells to differentiate into cells of multiple lineages and their persistent presence in women following pregnancy, it is intriguing to speculate that, as a consequence of genetic alterations or changes in their microenvironmental niche, these cells may act like cancer stem cells and give rise to tumors.

The results of one study suggest that fetal microchimerism may be involved in the pathogenesis or progression of cervical cancer ( 14). In this study, male cells were found in all cervical cancers tested. Interestingly, 24% (9 of 37) of microchimeric cells were found to be cytokeratin positive, a marker for epithelial cells. Although this result suggests that circulating cells of fetal origin may have differentiated and contributed to the development of cervical tumors, the number of tumors examined was very small, and further work needs to be done to draw firm conclusions.

The overall results of the previously cited breast cancer study clearly show a protective role for fetal microchimeric cells ( 7). In light of the possibility that these cells may sometimes give rise to tumors, however, it is noteworthy that the incidence of fetal cells in the peripheral blood buffy coat of two breast cancer cases in this study was very high relative to the incidence in other breast tumors and in normal control women. Thus, the two outlying cases had values of 277 and 374 fetal genomes per 106 maternal genomes, whereas the median concentrations for cases and controls were 2, with ranges of 0 to 375 and 0 to 78, respectively. Perhaps these two outlier cases are rare cases where fetal cells have transformed and actually contribute to the growth of the tumor.

To investigate the tumor-generating capacity of fetal microchimeric cells, my laboratory is using a mouse model in which the fate of fetal cells that express a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter transgene can be easily tracked in female mice following pregnancy. We and others have shown that GFP-expressing fetal cells can be detected in multiple organs many months postpartum. We found the highest frequency of fetal cells in the lung. In one experiment, we crossed A/J females to males bearing a CAG/GFP transgene (CAG is a strong, ubiquitously expressed promoter). A/J mice develop lung tumors at a high frequency relative to other mouse strains. In one 8-month-old A/J female, we discovered two solid lung tumor lesions in which a majority of the cells fluoresced bright green, indicating their fetal origin ( Fig. 1 ). Unfortunately, we were not able to determine the nature of these cells, but their large number and the gross appearance of the tumors suggest that they are indeed tumor cells and not immune cells recruited to the tumor site. Perhaps the microenvironment of normal lung stem cells contributes to the propensity of the A/J strain to develop lung tumors, and serves in a similar way to convert fetal cells lodged in the lung into cancer stem cells. Spurred on by this intriguing finding, we are continuing our studies and now use a luciferase reporter gene to track fetal cells, thus allowing us to use optical imaging to detect lung tumors containing fetal microchimeric cells in parous female mice.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, Lungs of A/J female mouse 8 months after she had given birth following mating with a CAG/EGFP male, observed under fluorescent light. Fetally derived GFP-expressing cells associated with a solid tumor are within the boxed area. Image of this tumor is enlarged in B. An apparent second lesion in a different lobe of the lung is indicated by the arrow. The arrowhead points to another lobe of the lung where fetally derived cells are absent.

Conclusion

We are only beginning to understand the role that fetal microchimeric cells play in cancer. As is the case in their involvement in noncancerous diseases where they sometimes fight the disease and other times contribute to the disease, these cells sometimes help to suppress tumor development by taking on an immunosurveillance role, and other times they may behave like cancer stem cells and contribute to the growth of tumors. Studies using mouse models to track fetal microchimeric cells in parous females will help us understand their innate potential for each of these diametrically opposed roles, thereby assessing their involvement in human cancers and allowing for the design of new therapeutic strategies based on this understanding.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: NIH grant CA133281.

Footnotes

    • Received August 4, 2008.
    • Accepted August 6, 2008.
    • ©2008 American Association for Cancer Research.

    References

    1. ↵
      Lambert NC, Lo YMD, Erickson TD, et al. Male microchimerism in healthy women and women with scleroderma: cells or circulating DNA? A quantitative answer. Blood 2002; 100: 2845–51.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      O'Donoghue K, Chan J, de la Fuente J, et al. Microchimerism in female bone marrow and bone decades after fetal mesenchymal stem-cell trafficking in pregnancy. Lancet 2004; 364: 179–82.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      Nelson JL. Pregnancy and microchimerism in autoimmune disease: protector or insurgent? Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 291–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      Adams KM, Nelson JL. Microchimerism. An investigative frontier in autoimmunity and transplantation. JAMA 2004; 291: 1127–31.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      Khosrotehrani K, Johnson KL, Cha DH, Salomon RN, Bianchi DW. Transfer of fetal cells with multilineage potential to maternal tissue. JAMA 2004; 292: 75–80.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      Gadi VK, Nelson JL. Fetal microchimerism in women with breast cancer. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 9035–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      Gadi VK, Malone KE, Guthrie KA, Porter PL, Nelson JL. Case-control study of fetal microchimerism and breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2008; 3: e1706.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    8. ↵
      Yu J, Ren X, Cao S, Li H, Hao X. Beneficial effects of fetal-maternal microchimerism on the activated haplo-identical peripheral blood stem cell treatment for cancer. Cytother 2008; 10: 331–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    9. ↵
      Gilmore GL, Haq B, Shadduck RK, Jasthy SL, Lister J. Fetal-maternal microchimerism in normal parous females and parous female cancer patients. Exp Hematol 2008; 36: 1073–7.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      Johnson AM, O'Connell MJ, Messing EM, Reeder JE. Decreased bladder cancer growth in parous mice. Urology 2008; 72: 470–3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      Whiteman DC, Siskind V, Purdie DM, Green AC. Timing of pregnancy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 42–6.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      O'Donoghue K, Sultan HA, Al-Allaf FA, Anderson JR, Wyatt-Ashmead J, Fisk NM. Microchimeric fetal cells cluster at sites of tissue injury in lung decades after pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 16: 382–90.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      Li L, Neaves WB. Normal stem cells and cancer stem cells: the niche matters. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 4553–7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      Cha DH, Khosrotehrani K, Kim Y, Stroh H, Bianchi DW, Johnson CL. Cervical cancer and microchimerism. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 774–81.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Cancer Research: 68 (23)
    December 2008
    Volume 68, Issue 23
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

    NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Fetal Microchimerism and Cancer
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
    (Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Fetal Microchimerism and Cancer
    Janet A. Sawicki
    Cancer Res December 1 2008 (68) (23) 9567-9569; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3008

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Fetal Microchimerism and Cancer
    Janet A. Sawicki
    Cancer Res December 1 2008 (68) (23) 9567-9569; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3008
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Background
      • Fetal Microchimeric Cells Suppress Cancer
      • Fetal Microchimeric Cells as Cancer Stem Cells?
      • Conclusion
      • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • PI3K Driver Mutations: A Membrane-Centric Perspective
    • Alterations to DNMT3A in Hematologic Malignancies
    • Small-Molecule MYC Inhibitors
    Show more Reviews
    • Home
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

    Articles

    • Online First
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts

    Info for

    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians

    About Cancer Research

    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    AACR logo

    Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

    Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
    Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
    Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
    American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

    Advertisement