Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology

Multipotent CD15+ Cancer Stem Cells in Patched-1–Deficient Mouse Medulloblastoma

Ryan J. Ward, Lilian Lee, Kevin Graham, Thevagi Satkunendran, Koichi Yoshikawa, Erick Ling, Lauren Harper, Ryan Austin, Erica Nieuwenhuis, Ian D. Clarke, Chi-chung Hui and Peter B. Dirks
Ryan J. Ward
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lilian Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thevagi Satkunendran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koichi Yoshikawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erick Ling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Harper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Austin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Nieuwenhuis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian D. Clarke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi-chung Hui
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter B. Dirks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0342 Published June 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Subpopulations of tumorigenic cells have been identified in many human tumors, although these cells may not be very rare in some types of cancer. Here, we report that medulloblastomas arising from Patched-1–deficient mice contain a subpopulation of cells that show a neural precursor phenotype, clonogenic and multilineage differentiation capacity, activated Hedgehog signaling, wild-type Patched-1 expression, and the ability to initiate tumors following allogeneic orthotopic transplantation. The normal neural stem cell surface antigen CD15 enriches for the in vitro proliferative and in vivo tumorigenic potential from uncultured medulloblastomas, supporting the existence of a cancer stem cell hierarchy in this clinically relevant mouse model of cancer. [Cancer Res 2009;69(11):4682–90]

  • Cancer Stem Cells
  • Patched-1 Medulloblastoma
  • Hedgehog Signaling
  • Brain Tumor
  • CD15

Introduction

Medulloblastoma (MB) is a cancer of neuronal phenotype and is the most frequent malignant brain tumor found in children. Disruptions of the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway occur in roughly 30% of human MBs analyzed, and Gorlin's syndrome patients, who have germline mutations in the Hh receptor Patched-1 (Ptc1), are at an increased risk of developing MB and cancers of other types ( 1). This clinical observation is recapitulated in mice heterozygous for the Ptc1 allele (Ptc1+/−; ref. 2). Ptc1+/− mice spontaneously develop MB at a reproducible frequency of 10% to 30% ( 2). Ptc1+/− combined with postnatal irradiation (IR) or homozygous deletion of the tumor suppressor protein Trp53 (p53) augments the severity and frequency (to 100% at 8–12 weeks) of MB occurring in these mice ( 3– 5).

It remains unclear if representative Ptc1+/− MB cells can be propagated in serum-free neural stem cell (NSC) conditions, as fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is reported to differentiate Ptc1+/− MB cells when analyzed up to 72 hours post dissociation ( 6, 7). Similar results were observed with the bone morphogenic protein treatment ( 8), but, importantly, there are no reports describing the generation of long-term, tumorigenic cell lines with activated Hedgehog signaling from Ptc1+/− MB in stem cell medium.

Cancer stem cells, tumor-initiating cells, or tumor-propagating cells, are defined functionally as an enriched population of cells within a primary tumor capable of transplanting a representative copy of that disease in vivo ( 9, 10). Subpopulations of cells meeting this functional criterion have now been identified in many human cancers ( 9). Human brain tumor-initiating cells were isolated based on the expression of CD133 ( 11, 12) and are reported to be relatively resistant to both radiation therapy and chemotherapy ( 13, 14). In addition, the application of stem cell methods to the study of brain cancer revealed that cells propagated in NSC medium more closely represent the tumor from which they were derived than do those established and propagated in serum-containing medium ( 15).

Here, we identify a rare, phenotypically primitive, multipotent, and tumorigenic population of Ptc1+/− MB cells that can be propagated without limit and studied in vitro in stem cell conditions. These cells retain activated Hh and Notch signaling and do not necessarily display Ptc1 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or loss of wild-type (WT) Ptc1 gene expression. Finally, the NSC marker Lewis X/stage-specific embryonic antigen 1/CD15 (CD15; ref. 16) prospectively enriches for proliferative cells in vitro and tumorigenic cells in vivo, identifying a subpopulation of cancer stem cells in this mouse model of MB.

Materials and Methods

Mouse husbandry and tumor processing. All mouse procedures were approved by the Hospital for Sick Children's Animal Care Committee. C57/B6 Trp53+/−, GFAP-TK mice (The Jackson Laboratory), and Ptc1+/− mice were mated to generate a breeding colony. Medulloblastomas were microdissected, dissociated by gentle pipetting in PBS followed by a 10 to 15 min Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich) digestion, and filtered sequentially through 70- and 40-μm nylon filters.

Flow cytometry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and in vivo injections. Cells were stained with 1 μL anti–CD15-FITC (BD Biosciences) and 1 μL anti–Ter-119-APC per 100 μL ice-cold PBS for at least 30 min, washed with PBS and filtered (40 μm) at least once post staining, suspended in 2 μL propidium iodide/mL ice-cold PBS, and processed through a MoFlo (Dako Cytomation) fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS). Cells were sorted into growth factor–free DMEM/F12 and the purity of each population was assessed at the end of each sort. Freshly sorted uncultured cells or cells from established cell lines were suspended in ∼2 to 5 μL cold PBS and injected into the cerebellum of nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) recipients using a rodent stereotaxic headframe as previously described ( 11). For intracellular Nestin flow cytometry, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature and stained for 30 min at room temperature in PBS/0.5% Tween 20 with 1 μL anti-Nestin followed by 1:16,000 anti–mouse-488.

Embryonic day 14.5 hindbrains were processed as described above. Cells were plated in mouse NSC medium ( 17) overnight before FACS. Cells were collected, dissociated by 5 to 10 min Accutase digestion, and stained with 2 μL anti–CD15-FITC and 1 μL anti–Ter119-APC per 100 μL PBS for a minimum of 30 min, on ice. Thereafter, cells were processed as described above. Cells were centrifuged and plated at a density of 1 × 104 per well in a 96-well plate. Seven days post sort, the number of neurospheres (minimum size ≥50 μm) in each population was counted.

Tissue culture, DNA, RNA, and protein analysis. In vitro cells were grown in mouse NSC medium [20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF) and 20 ng/mL basic FGF; ref. 17] on Primaria culture plates (BD Biosciences). Time lapse photomicroscopy and calculations of well confluency were performed using the IncuCyte live-cell imaging system (Essen Instruments).

Hh and Notch target genes were analyzed by PCR (Supplementary Materials and Methods) and/or Western blot by standard procedures. Cells and mouse ear punches were genotyped as previously described ( 18), as was the analysis of WT Ptc1 RNA expression (ref. 19; Supplementary Materials and Methods).

In vitro limiting dilution analysis was performed in 96-well plates as previously described ( 20) and analyzed for the presence of adherent, proliferating colonies at least 2 wk post culture. For dose response analysis, established cell lines were seeded at a density of 2,500 cells per well in a 96-well format and analyzed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay after 7 d of growth in the absence or presence of indicated concentrations of cyclopamine (Sigma Aldrich) or N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT; Sigma Aldrich). Established cell lines or freshly dissociated tumors were plated in indicated concentrations of ganciclovir (Sigma Aldrich) and analyzed as described for MTT assay or limiting dilution assay. For differentiation assays, cells were subjected to a two-step, sequential EGF/FGF withdrawal differentiation protocol ( 21) performed over 2 wk with or without the addition of 10% fetal bovine serum.

Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry. Freshly dissociated tumor cells were cytospun onto glass slides (105 per slide) and established cell lines were grown on poly-l-ornithine/laminin–coated glass coverslips. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, washed with PBS, and permeabilized in 0.3% Triton X for 30 min. Paraformaldehyde (4%)–fixed tissue was paraffin embedded and sectioned to generate 6-μm tissue slices. Tissue sections were processed by a standard protocol and stained with indicated primary antibodies (Supplementary Materials and Methods).

Results

Rare, phenotypically primitive, and multipotent Ptc1+/− MB cells can be propagated in vitro. We sought to determine if a population of Ptc1+/− MB cells could be propagated in NSC medium if analyzed beyond a 72-hour time point. Primary tumors were plated in a serum-free medium containing 20 ng/mL EGF and 20 ng/mL basic FGF. Twenty-four hours later, cells from Ptc1+/−p53+/+, Ptc1+/−p53+/−, Ptc1+/−p53−/−, and IR Ptc1+/− MB aggregated into clusters, the majority of which did not go on to proliferate ( Fig. 1A ). One to 3 weeks later, adherent proliferating colonies were observed from every MB tested. Ptc1+/− MB cells primarily grew adherent to plastic, but occasionally as semiattached or free-floating spheres (Supplementary Fig. S1), and could be made adherent by coating plates with 0.1% gelatin ( 22). In X-gal substrate, cells stained positive for β-galactosidase expression, suggesting activated Hh signaling (Supplementary Fig. S1), and could be propagated long term (>50 passages) in vitro without reduction of proliferative potential. To ensure that expanded cells were of MB origin, we transplanted uncultured tumor cells into the brains of NOD/SCID mice and expanded individual colonies from the resulting allografts (Supplementary Fig. S2). We observed that that all cultures were Ptc1−/− and LacZ/Neo+, discounting the possibility that cultures contained contaminating normal cells.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, primary Ptc1+/− MB were dissected and dissociated into single cells and cultured in serum-free medium. Within 12 to 24 h, cells amalgamated into floating clusters, the majority of which did not go on to proliferate (red arrows). One to 3 wk later, adherent proliferating colonies (green arrows) could be observed from every MB tested and expanded as cell lines, irrespective of p53 genotype or early postnatal IR. B, Ptc1+/− MB cell lines showed a precursor phenotype, expressing Nestin, Sox2, and Math1. EGF and FGF withdrawal induced markers of mature glial (S100β, CNPase) and neuronal (βIII-tubulin) cell types. C, primary Ptc1+/− MB cells were cytospun and stained for Nestin and Math1, GFAP, Sox2, or Map2 to identify cells of the neural precursor phenotype. D, established Ptc1+/− MB cell lines or primary tumors, derived from GFAP-TK+ or GFAP-TK− mice, were plated in the absence or presence of ganciclovir. GFAP-TK+ cells were significantly inhibited in their proliferative capacity or in their ability to establish proliferative colonies in vitro (t test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

We performed an in vitro limiting dilution growth analysis of primary MB cells to determine their clonogenic capacity. All tumors studied contained a rare (<1%) population of clonogenic cells. Tumors derived from Ptc1+/−p53−/− and IR Ptc1+/− showed the highest clonogenic capacity [1:4,000 cells (n = 8 tumors), 1:8,000 cells (n = 3 tumors), respectively] compared with Ptc1+/−p53+/− and Ptc1+/−p53+/+ tumors (both >1:50,000 cells; n > 6 tumors).

Cell lines showed a neural precursor phenotype expressing Nestin, Sox2, Musashi, GFAP, and Math1 but not neuronal (βIII tubulin, MAP2) or glial (S100β, CNPase) cell markers ( Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S3 and data not shown). Growth factor withdrawal or serum treatment induced the expression of mature astrocytic, oligodendral, and neuronal cell markers (S100β, CNPase, βIII tubulin, respectively), indicating a capacity of these cell lines to undergo multilineage differentiation ( Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S3). Differentiated single cell–derived cultures also expressed all lineage markers, including CNPase, further demonstrating the multilineage differentiation capacity of MB cells (data not shown). Conversion of cells to serum-containing medium dramatically altered cell morphology, inhibited proliferation, decreased Nestin expression from >90% of the cells to undetectable levels, but did not reduce Math1 expression, suggesting that this transcription factor is expressed by both proliferating and nonproliferating MB cells (Supplementary Fig. S4).

To determine if cells of precursor phenotype could be identified in primary tumors, we cytospun freshly dissociated Ptc1+/− MB cells onto glass slides and analyzed their phenotypes. Greater than 97% of all cells stained positive for Math1, and a relatively rare (<5%) population of cells coexpressed the neural precursor markers Nestin, Sox2, and GFAP, a phenotype similar to that of forebrain and cerebellar mouse NSCs (refs. 19, 23; Fig. 1C).

To test the possibility that serum-free culture conditions expanded rare Nestin+Sox2+GFAP+ cells within the primary tumor, we crossed our Ptc1+/− mice with mice expressing the viral gene thymidine kinase (TK) from the GFAP promoter (GFAP-TK), which marks NSCs in both the cerebellum and the forebrain. Ganciclovir infusion into the brains of GFAP-TK mice ablates the NSC population in vivo ( 24). The proliferation of established cell lines and freshly dissociated tumors derived from Ptc1+/−GFAP-TK+ MBs was significantly inhibited upon the addition of 0.25 to 2 μmol/L ganciclovir, concentrations that did not show any nonspecific toxicity or bystander effect in controls ( Fig. 1D; Supplementary Fig. S5).

Ptc1+/−p53−/− MB cell lines initiate the growth of phenotypically representative tumors in vivo. We injected 105 cells from established Ptc1+/−p53−/− cell lines (n = 3) into the cerebella of NOD/SCID mice. Eight to 12 weeks after injection, MBs were clearly apparent and mirrored the primary tumor histology, demonstrating expression of neuronal (Map2), astrocytic (GFAP and S100β), and oligodendral (CNPase) cell lineages ( Fig. 2 ). Despite >90% Nestin expression in Ptc1+/− MB cells in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S4), only rare Nestin+ cells could be identified in the tumors arising from orthotopically injected cell lines. Nestin+ and S100β+cells could also be observed when freshly dissociated Ptc1+/−p53−/− tumors or established cell lines were injected s.c. into the flanks of NOD/SCID mice, suggesting that cells of glial and stem cell phenotype are tumor derived, versus normal brain (Supplementary Fig. S6).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Primary Ptc1+/− MB (left) and tumors arising from injections of 1 × 105 MB cell lines (right) were stained with H&E (A) or 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; B) and immunostained for the expression of Nestin, Map2, GFAP, S100β, and CNPase.

Interestingly, despite the proliferative and phenotypic similarities between p53+/+ and p53−/− Ptc1+/− MB cells in vitro, we observed a difference in their tumorigenic capacity based on their respective p53 genotype. Thus far, we have not generated tumors in NOD/SCID recipients when injecting up to 106 cells from Ptc1+/−p53+/+ cell lines.

Ptc1+/− MB cell lines maintain activated Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways. Ptc1+/− MB cell lines of differing genotypes (n = 6) all showed constitutively activated Hh and Notch signaling, expressing all Gli transcripts, Ptc2, Hes1, and Hes5 mRNA ( Fig. 3A ). Expression of Gli proteins was observed, for Gli3 in full-length/activator and repressor forms ( Fig. 3B). The growth of all cell lines tested was inhibited after treatment with the Hh signaling inhibitor cyclopamine at IC50 values between 1 and 3 μmol/L, correlating with down-regulation of expression of Hh signaling components ( Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A, Ptc1+/− MB cell lines express Hedgehog (Gli1, Gli2, Ptc2) and Notch (Hes1, Hes2) target genes as determined by RT-PCR [e14.5 HB, embryonic day 14.5 hindbrain tissue, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), control]. B, proliferation (IC50 = 1–3 μmol/L) and expression of Hh target genes is inhibited by 5 μmol/L cyclopamine treatment. Serum treatment abolished protein expression of Hh targets [Gli1, Gli2, Gli3-full length (FL), Gli3-repressor (Rep), and actin protein analysis by Western blot; Ptc2 and GAPDH expression analysis by RT-PCR]. C, proliferation (IC50 = 10 μmol/L) and expression of Notch target genes is inhibited by treatment with 10 μmol/L of the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT (Hes1 and Hes5 expression analysis by RT-PCR and confirmation of Hes1 expression by real-time PCR).

The expression of all three Gli proteins was greatly reduced in serum-treated cells, consistent with lack of activated Hh signaling in serum cultured Ptc1+/− MB cell lines (ref. 7; Fig. 3C). Similarly, γ-secretase inhibition by DAPT treatment resulted in proliferative inhibition (IC50 10 μmol/L) and down-regulation of Notch target genes Hes1 and Hes5, indicating an active Notch signaling pathway in vitro ( Fig. 3C).

Loss of Ptc1 heterozygosity, or WT RNA expression, is not required for Ptc1+/− MB development. We genotyped our MB cell lines and in some cases we could detect a WT Ptc1 allele, and in others LOH for Ptc1 in multiple established cell lines, with or without loss of p53 (n = 21 cell lines analyzed, Ptc1−/− n = 11, Ptc1+/− n = 10; Fig. 4A ). MB cultures showed the same Ptc1 genotype when compared with the primary tumor from which they were derived ( Fig. 4B), and cell lines that retained the WT Ptc1 allele expressed WT Ptc1 mRNA when analyzed by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using exon 2–specific primers ( Fig. 4C). Single-cell sorting and clonal expansion of two lines revealed that all subsequent clones (>10 analyzed) had the same genotype as the parental cell line, discounting the possibility of Ptc1 allelic heterogeneity within the bulk culture ( Fig. 4D). Importantly, tumors developed when Ptc1 mRNA–expressing cell lines Ptc1+/−p53−/− 266 and 302 were injected orthotopically into NOD/SCID recipients, demonstrating that tumorigenicity is not dependent on Ptc1 LOH (Supplementary Fig. S6).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A and B, Ptc1+/− MB cell lines were genotyped by PCR reaction of genomic DNA. The Ptc1 WT allele could be detected in some cell lines (+) and (B) in some primary tumors from which they were derived. C, WT Ptc1 RNA could be detected in the cell lines that retained the WT Ptc1 allele as determined by RT-PCR reaction with WT-specific primers. e14.5 HB, WT embryonic day 14.5 hindbrain tissue, negative control for LacZ/Neo cassette. Bottom, schematic showing the disruption of the WT Ptc1 allele by LacZ/Neo cassette. D, heterogeneity for the Ptc1 allele does not exist within established cell lines. Single cells were deposited by FACS, expanded clonally, and genotyped. All subclones showed the same genotype as the parental cell lines from which they were derived.

CD15 enriches for proliferative cells in vitro and tumorigenic cells in vivo. Both normal human NSCs and human medulloblastoma cancer stem cells can be enriched by cell sorting for CD133 ( 11, 25). Human brain cancer cells are known to share other similarities, in phenotype and behavior, to that of normal NSCs ( 11, 26– 29). We sought to determine if Ptc1+/− MBs contained a population of cells enriched for tumor-initiating capacity and reasoned that the same cell surface markers that enrich for normal mouse NSCs may also enrich for Ptc1+/− MB tumor-initiating cells. Multipotent mouse NSCs can be enriched from embryonic brains using the carbohydrate cell surface antigen CD15 ( 16). We reproduced this observation using mouse embryonic hindbrain tissues ( Fig. 5A ) and observed that CD15 is a more reliable marker compared with Prominin-1 when cell sorting mouse NSCs (data not shown). When we analyzed freshly dissociated Ptc1+/− MB cells for the expression of Prominin-1, we were unable to appreciate a convincing Prominin-1+ population (Supplementary Fig. S7). Therefore, we selected CD15 as a candidate marker to enrich for Ptc1+/− MB tumor-initiating cells.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

A, representative FACS profiles of embryonic day 14.5 (e14.5) WT hindbrain (HB) cells stained for CD15-FITC and the erythroid lineage marker Ter119−APC. APC-negative (Ter119−APC−), CD15-positive (CD15+), or CD15-negative (CD15−) populations were sorted by FACS. The purity of each population was determined immediately post sort, and both populations were plated in vitro. Seven days post sort, the number of neurospheres in each population was counted. Sphere assay data from three independent time-mated litters and sorts. *P < 0.05, t test. B, representative data from Ter119−APC−, CD15+, or CD15− sorted cells derived from a freshly dissociated, uncultured Ptc1+/− MB. The purity of each population was determined immediately post sort; cells were plated in mouse NSC medium and imaged 14 d post sort. CD15+ cells quickly grew to confluence.

Freshly dissected, uncultured Ptc1+/− MB cells (n = 11 independent tumors analyzed) were stained with anti–CD15-FITC, propidium iodide, and the erythroid lineage marker Ter119−APC. Live, Ter119−, and CD15+ or CD15− cells were sorted by FACS. The purity of the sorted populations was verified post FACS, and all CD15− populations were ≥95% (mean 97%, median 98%) pure whereas CD15+ populations ranged in purity (mean 74%, median 75%; Fig. 5B). Cells were immediately cultured in NSC medium or injected orthotopically into the cerebella of NOD/SCID mice. Unsorted, bulk Ptc1+/− cells from eight MBs were also injected to determine the tumorigenic capacity of freshly dissociated tumors.

In vitro, freshly isolated tumor cells capable of growing in NSC medium were enriched in the CD15+ population; however, after cultures are established, both CD15+ and CD15− populations give rise to CD15 heterogeneity (Supplementary Fig. S8). Similarly, the CD15+ population transplanted the disease to NOD/SCID recipients in three of four orthotopic transplants at 100,000 cells injected, and in five of six transplants at 10,000 cells injected ( Table 1 ). Injections of CD15− cells only resulted in three tumors from eight injections at 100,000 cells and no tumor formation in five attempts, comprising independent tumors, at 10,000 cells injected ( Table 1). Consistent with previous findings, unsorted bulk tumor cells showed very little capacity to transplant the disease at injections of 100,000 cells or more ( 5, 30), and no tumors developed from injections of 10,000 cells ( Table 1). No tumor formation was observed for any population of cells when fewer than 10,000 cells were injected, suggesting that greater purification of the CD15+ population is required to further enrich for Ptc1+/− MB tumor-initiating cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bulk, unsorted Ptc1+/− MB cells, and freshly sorted, uncultured CD15+ or CD15− cells were injected orthotopically in the cerebella of NOD/SCID recipients at the indicated cell densities

Discussion

Ptc1+/− mice closely recapitulate clinical observations made from Gorlin's patients, both of which have been reported to display desmoplastic forms of the disease ( 31, 32). Irradiated and p53-deficient Ptc1+/− mice are thought to represent the aggressive, classic version of human MB ( 33). Approximately 20% of human MBs of the anaplastic variant display aberrations within the p53-ARF signaling pathway ( 34) and 10% of Li-Fraumeni patients develop MB within their first decade of life ( 35). Although MB is now being modeled in mice through biallelic deletion of the Ptc1 gene ( 36), an analysis of clinical specimens suggests that this strategy models a limited spectrum of the disease: Ptc1 mutations, or loss of heterozygosity for the Ptc1 allele, only occur in a minority (∼10%) of human MB ( 31, 37, 38). Pietsch and colleagues detected these aberrations exclusively within the desmoplastic MB variant, and not in any of the 57 samples of classic histopathology ( 31). Modeling MB with p53 deficiency may allow a more representative spectrum of the mutations observed in the aggressive and clinically important MB of classic histopathology.

A stem cell–based methodology revealed that a rare population of Ptc1+/− MB cells have the capacity to grow in vitro in serum-free conditions containing EGF and FGF, as is observed with human MB cells. Paradoxically, Fogarty and colleagues reported that FGF, a principal component of serum-free medium that supports the growth of human MB cells and normal NSCs in vitro, differentiates isolated Ptc1+/− MB cells and suggested that FGF may serve as an effective treatment for human MB ( 6). Read and colleagues recently reported that the inability to propagate Ptc1+/− MB cells in stem cell conditions, and the failure of Prominin-1 to identify tumor-initiating cells, suggested that MB-propagating cells display a progenitor, and not a stem cell, phenotype ( 30). The fact that tumorigenic human MB cells with stem cell phenotype can be propagated in FGF-containing medium ( 12, 27) and the results presented in our study challenge these conclusions.

We observed that all Ptc1+/− MB cell lines growing in NSC medium display a neural precursor phenotype ( 23) and show the capacity for multilineage differentiation, including cultures derived from single cells. Cells capable of establishing cultures from fresh tumors show a stem cell phenotype, pointing to a more primitive population of cells that drive tumor growth in vivo than unipotent granule cell precursors. Consistent with this idea is the recent observation that perivascular Nestin+ Ptc1+/− MB cells reenter the cell cycle post-IR to repopulate the tumor in vivo ( 39), results that closely mirror the behavior of human cancer stem cells in vivo ( 13, 40).

Doubt regarding the utility of serum-derived Ptc1+/− MB cell lines was first reported by Sasai and colleagues from the observation that these cells do not retain activated Hh signaling in vitro, nor could pathway activity be restored when cell lines were injected in vivo ( 7). Similar results have been observed with traditional serum-grown human brain tumor cell lines compared with primary patient samples, providing further evidence that serum-established and serum-propagated cell lines sometimes bear little resemblance to the disease from which they were derived ( 15). In serum-free conditions, normal NSCs show activation of numerous developmental pathways, including the Hh and Notch signaling ( 41– 43). It is perhaps not surprising, then, that activated Hh and Notch signaling is observed in our Ptc1+/− MB cell lines. In agreement with the differentiating role of serum, expression of Hh pathway components was abolished when our Ptc1+/− MB cell lines were treated with 10% serum. Unlike Ptc1+/− MB cells grown in 10% to 20% serum, cell lines established and propagated in NSC medium retain the activated Hh and Notch signaling observed in the in vivo disease ( 44).

We observed that some, but not all, Ptc1+/− MBs show Ptc1 LOH. Importantly, cell lines show the same genotype as the tumors from which they were derived, express WT Ptc1 RNA if they retain the WT allele, and initiate the growth of tumors in the absence of Ptc1 LOH. These observations reconcile some of the debate in the past literature and support both positions in that Ptc1 LOH occurs in the tumorigenic process but is not absolutely required in every instance. This result suggests that these tumors are more genetically complex than widely believed and that studies that only model the tumorigenic process in the context of Ptc1 LOH may not fully consider the repertoire of mutations or tumor-initiating events arising in these mice. What are the additional contributing events that lead to MB in tumors that retain expression from the WT Ptc1 gene? Although not addressed in this study, possibilities include point mutations within the WT Ptc1 sequence ( 45), changes in posttranscriptional and/or posttranslational modifications, or aberrations in other components of the Hh signaling pathway as is observed in the human disease ( 46).

Finally, the cancer stem cell hypothesis continues to attract debate ( 47) and the identification of cancer stem cells requires an enrichment in tumor-initiating capacity compared with the bulk tumor population. Recently, Read and colleagues reported that 3 × 105 unsorted and 3 × 105 CD15+ Ptc1+/− MB cells could transplant the disease in vivo, whereas 3 × 105 CD15− cells did not ( 30). Here, we report that tumor-initiating cells from Ptc1+/− MBs are enriched within the CD15+ population. CD15+ cells reliably transplanted the disease when 1e4 cells were injected, whereas CD15− and unsorted cells did not. As is consistent with tumor-initiating cells from human brain cancer, this same cell surface marker also prospectively identifies multipotent mouse NSCs from the forebrain and hindbrain ( 16). These results recapitulate those made from CD133+ human brain tumor-initiating cells, although with a different marker, and suggest that the identification of human cancer stem cells is not simply a consequence of xenotransplantation or a failure of human cells to properly engage the mouse microenvironment.

We are the first to report that cells from Ptc1+/− tumors can be propagated long term in vitro in serum-free conditions containing EGF and FGF, demonstrating stem cell properties, tumor-initiating capacity, and activated developmental signaling pathways. These results are in close agreement with those obtained when stem cell–based methodologies were applied to the study of human cancer and suggest that the Ptc1+/− MB tumor-initiating cell shows a stem cell and not lineage-restricted phenotype. Our genetic analysis of tumors from Ptc1+/− mice indicates a molecular heterogeneity for Ptc1 LOH and suggests distinct molecular mechanisms of MB initiation in this model. In summary, our stem cell–based interrogation of this clinically representative mouse model of cancer shows that they recapitulate the functional hierarchy observed within human MB, with a tumor-initiating population identified by a cell surface marker—a critical finding for this intensively studied preclinical therapeutic model.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: R.J. Ward is supported by a Canada Graduate Studentship (Doctoral) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. C.-c. Hui's research laboratory is funded by the Canadian Cancer Society. P.B. Dirks' research laboratory is supported by the Canadian Cancer Society, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Genome Canada, Ontario Genomics Institute, Jessica's Footprint, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Stem Cell Network of Canada, and Brainchild Foundation.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the members of the UHN-SickKids Cytometry Facility and Dirks laboratory members for their expertise.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • K. Graham and T. Satkunendran are equally contributing authors.

  • Received January 29, 2009.
  • Revision received March 20, 2009.
  • Accepted March 23, 2009.
  • ©2009 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    Wechsler-Reya R, Scott MP. The developmental biology of brain tumors. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24: 385–428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Goodrich LV, Milenkovic L, Higgins KM, Scott MP. Altered neural cell fates and medulloblastoma in mouse patched mutants. Science 1997; 277: 1109–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Wetmore C, Eberhart DE, Curran T. Loss of p53 but not ARF accelerates medulloblastoma in mice heterozygous for patched. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 513–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Pazzaglia S, Tanori M, Mancuso M, et al. Linking DNA damage to medulloblastoma tumorigenesis in patched heterozygous knockout mice. Oncogene 2006; 25: 1165–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Berman DM, Karhadkar SS, Hallahan AR, et al. Medulloblastoma growth inhibition by hedgehog pathway blockade. Science 2002; 297: 1559–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Fogarty MP, Emmenegger BA, Grasfeder LL, Oliver TG, Wechsler-Reya RJ. Fibroblast growth factor blocks Sonic hedgehog signaling in neuronal precursors and tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 2973–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Sasai K, Romer JT, Lee Y, et al. Shh pathway activity is down-regulated in cultured medulloblastoma cells: implications for preclinical studies. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 4215–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Zhao H, Ayrault O, Zindy F, Kim JH, Roussel MF. Post-transcriptional down-regulation of Atoh1/Math1 by bone morphogenic proteins suppresses medulloblastoma development. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 722–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev 2008; 8: 755–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Ward RJ, Dirks PB. Cancer stem cells: at the headwaters of tumor development. Annu Rev Pathol 2007; 2: 175–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 2004; 432: 396–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5821–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, et al. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 2006; 444: 756–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Liu G, Yuan X, Zeng Z, et al. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer 2006; 5: 67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Lee J, Kotliarova S, Kotliarov Y, et al. Tumor stem cells derived from glioblastomas cultured in bFGF and EGF more closely mirror the phenotype and genotype of primary tumors than do serum-cultured cell lines. Cancer Cell 2006; 9: 391–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Capela A, Temple S. LeX/ssea-1 is expressed by adult mouse CNS stem cells, identifying them as nonependymal. Neuron 2002; 35: 865–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 1992; 255: 1707–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Nieuwenhuis E, Barnfield PC, Makino S, Hui CC. Epidermal hyperplasia and expansion of the interfollicular stem cell compartment in mutant mice with a C-terminal truncation of Patched1. Dev Biol 2007; 308: 547–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Oliver TG, Read TA, Kessler JD, et al. Loss of patched and disruption of granule cell development in a pre-neoplastic stage of medulloblastoma. Development 2005; 132: 2425–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Tropepe V, Sibilia M, Ciruna BG, Rossant J, Wagner EF, van der Kooy D. Distinct neural stem cells proliferate in response to EGF and FGF in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev Biol 1999; 208: 166–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Pollard SM, Conti L, Sun Y, Goffredo D, Smith A. Adherent neural stem (NS) cells from fetal and adult forebrain. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16 Suppl 1: i112–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Conti L, Pollard SM, Gorba T, et al. Niche-independent symmetrical self-renewal of a mammalian tissue stem cell. PLoS Biol 2005; 3: e283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Lee A, Kessler JD, Read TA, et al. Isolation of neural stem cells from the postnatal cerebellum. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 723–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Morshead CM, Garcia AD, Sofroniew MV, van Der Kooy D. The ablation of glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive cells from the adult central nervous system results in the loss of forebrain neural stem cells but not retinal stem cells. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18: 76–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Uchida N, Buck DW, He D, et al. Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 14720–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Galli R, Binda E, Orfanelli U, et al. Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 7011–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Hemmati HD, Nakano I, Lazareff JA, et al. Cancerous stem cells can arise from pediatric brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 15178–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. Clement V, Sanchez P, de Tribolet N, Radovanovic I, Ruiz i Altaba A. HEDGEHOG-GLI1 signaling regulates human glioma growth, cancer stem cell self-renewal, and tumorigenicity. Curr Biol 2007; 17: 165–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Piccirillo SG, Reynolds BA, Zanetti N, et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins inhibit the tumorigenic potential of human brain tumour-initiating cells. Nature 2006; 444: 761–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Read TA, Fogarty MP, Markant SL, et al. Identification of CD15 as a marker for tumor-propagating cells in a mouse model of medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 2009; 15: 135–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Pietsch T, Waha A, Koch A, et al. Medulloblastomas of the desmoplastic variant carry mutations of the human homologue of Drosophila patched. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 2085–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Kim JY, Nelson AL, Algon SA, et al. Medulloblastoma tumorigenesis diverges from cerebellar granule cell differentiation in patched heterozygous mice. Dev Biol 2003; 263: 50–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Lee Y, Miller HL, Jensen P, et al. A molecular fingerprint for medulloblastoma. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5428–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Frank AJ, Hernan R, Hollander A, et al. The TP53-ARF tumor suppressor pathway is frequently disrupted in large/cell anaplastic medulloblastoma. Brain Res 2004; 121: 137–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    Kleihues P, Schauble B, zur Hausen A, Esteve J, Ohgaki H. Tumors associated with p53 germline mutations: a synopsis of 91 families. Am J Pathol 1997; 150: 1–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Yang ZJ, Ellis T, Markant SL, et al. Medulloblastoma can be initiated by deletion of Patched in lineage-restricted progenitors or stem cells. Cancer Cell 2008; 14: 135–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Wolter M, Reifenberger J, Sommer C, Ruzicka T, Reifenberger G. Mutations in the human homologue of the Drosophila segment polarity gene patched (PTCH) in sporadic basal cell carcinomas of the skin and primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 2581–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Vorechovsky I, Tingby O, Hartman M, et al. Somatic mutations in the human homologue of Drosophila patched in primitive neuroectodermal tumours. Oncogene 1997; 15: 361–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Hambardzumyan D, Becher OJ, Rosenblum MK, Pandolfi PP, Manova-Todorova K, Holland EC. PI3K pathway regulates survival of cancer stem cells residing in the perivascular niche following radiation in medulloblastoma in vivo. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 436–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M, et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 69–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Palma V, Lim DA, Dahmane N, et al. Sonic hedgehog controls stem cell behavior in the postnatal and adult brain. Development 2005; 132: 335–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. Palma V, Ruiz i Altaba A. Hedgehog-GLI signaling regulates the behavior of cells with stem cell properties in the developing neocortex. Development 2004; 131: 337–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    de la Pompa JL, Wakeham A, Correia KM, et al. Conservation of the Notch signalling pathway in mammalian neurogenesis. Development 1997; 124: 1139–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  44. ↵
    Hallahan AR, Pritchard JI, Hansen S, et al. The SmoA1 mouse model reveals that notch signaling is critical for the growth and survival of sonic hedgehog-induced medulloblastomas. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 7794–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Zurawel RH, Allen C, Wechsler-Reya R, Scott MP, Raffel C. Evidence that haploinsufficiency of Ptch leads to medulloblastoma in mice. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000; 28: 77–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Taylor MD, Liu L, Raffel C, et al. Mutations in SUFU predispose to medulloblastoma. Nat Genet 2002; 31: 306–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Eaves CJ. Cancer stem cells: Here, there, everywhere? Nature 2008; 456: 581–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 69 (11)
June 2009
Volume 69, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multipotent CD15+ Cancer Stem Cells in Patched-1–Deficient Mouse Medulloblastoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Multipotent CD15+ Cancer Stem Cells in Patched-1–Deficient Mouse Medulloblastoma
Ryan J. Ward, Lilian Lee, Kevin Graham, Thevagi Satkunendran, Koichi Yoshikawa, Erick Ling, Lauren Harper, Ryan Austin, Erica Nieuwenhuis, Ian D. Clarke, Chi-chung Hui and Peter B. Dirks
Cancer Res June 1 2009 (69) (11) 4682-4690; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0342

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Multipotent CD15+ Cancer Stem Cells in Patched-1–Deficient Mouse Medulloblastoma
Ryan J. Ward, Lilian Lee, Kevin Graham, Thevagi Satkunendran, Koichi Yoshikawa, Erick Ling, Lauren Harper, Ryan Austin, Erica Nieuwenhuis, Ian D. Clarke, Chi-chung Hui and Peter B. Dirks
Cancer Res June 1 2009 (69) (11) 4682-4690; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0342
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Diversity in Proadhesive Signaling Mechanisms in B-CLL Lymphocytes
  • Role of ATM Phosphorylation in Exon 11 of BRCA1
  • Methylated Genes in TGF-β Signaling in HNSCC
Show more Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement