Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology

A Novel Splice Variant of GLI1 That Promotes Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Invasion

Hui-Wen Lo, Hu Zhu, Xinyu Cao, Amy Aldrich and Francis Ali-Osman
Hui-Wen Lo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hu Zhu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinyu Cao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Aldrich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis Ali-Osman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0886 Published September 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Identification of a novel GLI1 splice variant. A, simplified gene structures of GLI1 and tGLI1. The GLI1 gene is composed of 12 exons, including the 5′-untranslated exon 1. The GLI1 coding region spans nucleotides +79 to +3,399 with the initiating methionine codon, ATG, at +79 in exon 2 (arrows). tGLI1 transcript lacks the entire exon 3 and part of exon 4, corresponding to 41 codons (clear box). Gray boxes, exons; lines, introns. GLI1 domains retained in tGLI1 include the intact degron degradation signals (Dn and Dc), Sufu-binding domains, zinc finger domains (ZF), the nuclear localization signal (NLS), and the transactivation domain. B, a representative DNA sequencing histogram indicating the junction of exons 2 and 4 in the tGLI1 variant. C, tGLI1 is highly expressed in GBM cell lines, xenografts, and primary specimens. Representative results of agarose gel electrophoresis of GLI1 and tGLI1 RT-PCR products from 18 GBM cell lines, xenografts, and specimens showing transcripts of either GLI1 alone or both of the 474 bp GLI1 and 350 bp tGLI1. Cell lines: lane 1, UW281; lane 2, MGR2; lane 3, MGR3; lane 4, T98G; lane 5, U373MG; lane 6, UW5; lane 7, UW15; lane 8, UW19; lane 9, UW35; lane 10, U138MG; lane 11, CRL1718; lane 12, UW78. Xenografts: lane 13, D-256MG; lane 14, D-320MG; lane 15, D-456MG. Primary GBM specimens: lanes 16 to 18. D, lack of tGLI1 expression in normal brain tissues and other normal tissues. Eight normal brain tissues and seven other normal tissues were subjected to RT-PCR for GLI1, tGLI1, and β-actin transcripts. Representative of three independent experiments. aa, amino acids; nt, nucleotides.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    tGLI1 variant retains the ability to activate consensus GLI1-binding sites and undergo nuclear translocalization similar to GLI1. A, characterization of GBM cell lines stably expressing GLI1/tGLI1. Three GBM stable transfectants and a primary GBM specimen were analyzed for GLI1/tGLI1 expression by RT-PCR (left) and immunoblotting (right). In immunoblotting, anti-flag and anti-GLI1 (rabbit) antibodies were used to detect GLI1/tGLI1. B, tGLI1 activates a GLI1-binding site–containing promoter similar to the wild-type GLI1. Stable transfectants were cotransfected with a firefly luciferase reporter containing GLI1-binding sites, 8x3′Gli-BS Luc, and a Renilla reporter to control for transfection efficiency. Forty-eight hours following transfection, cells were treated with and without Shh (100 ng/mL) for 4 h and harvested and the level of transactivation (luciferase activity) was measured ( 11). Relative luciferase activity for the firefly luciferase activity was obtained after normalization against Renilla luciferase. Mean ± SD of three independent experiments. C, tGLI1 protein retains the ability to undergo nuclear translocalization. Top, U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 cells were fractionated into nuclear and nonnuclear fractions. Lamin B and α-tubulin were used as nuclear and cytoplasmic markers, respectively. Bottom, immunofluorescence staining/confocal microscopy. The flag antibody was used to detect GLI1/tGLI1. Nuclei were visualized by staining with propidium iodide (red). Green, GLI1/tGLI1; yellow, nuclear GLI1/tGLI1. D, expression of GLI1 and tGLI1 did not alter growth rate of U87MG cells. U87MG stable transfectants were monitored for proliferation for 72 h.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    tGLI1 variant has a higher propensity to promote the migratory and invasive phenotype in GBM cells than GLI1. A, U87MG-tGLI1 cells migrate at a significantly higher rate than U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. U87MG-vector, U87MG-tGLI1, and U87MG-GLI1 cells were subjected to the scratch wound assay. Columns, width of the initial scratch gap at the start of the experiment. A migratory index, Im, was defined as Im = (g0 - gt) / g0, where gt and g0 are the gap widths at time t and time 0, respectively. B, U87MG-tGLI1 cells are more invasive than U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. Following 24-h incubation, the fluorescence in cells that had invaded the basement membrane was quantified. Cell proliferation was simultaneously determined before and after the time required for the invasion assay. Net invasiveness was determined using an invasion/proliferation ratio with U87MG-GLI1 cells as 1.0. P values were determined by the Student's t test. Bottom, invasive cells after staining with crystal violet. C and D, tGLI1-expressing T98G GBM cells are more migratory and invasive than those with GLI1. T98G cells were transiently transfected with the control, GLI1, and tGLI1 expression vectors and subjected to the scratch wound assay for migration (C, top) and RT-PCR and immunoblotting (C, bottom) for expression of GLI1/tGLI1 and invasion assay for invasiveness (D).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    tGLI1 leads to a unique expression profile and activates CD24 expression. A, differential gene expression patterns of U87MG-tGLI1 cells compared with U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. GeneChip DNA microarray and subsequent data analyses were conducted to compare gene expression profiles of the U87MG transfectant lines. Cluster analysis included 75 genes that were expressed at significantly higher levels (>2-fold; P < 0.05) in U87MG-tGLI1 cells than U87MG-vector and U87MG-GLI1 cells. A color scale (bottom) shows the range of gene expression. Arrows, CD24 and MEST genes that were validated in subsequent studies. B to D, CD24 expression is up-regulated in tGLI1-expressing GBM cells. RT-PCR (B), quantitative RT-PCR (C), and immunoblotting (D) were done to determine CD24 expression level in U87MG stable transfectants. Compared with U87MG-vector cells, U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 cells expressed higher levels of PTCH1, a well-known GLI1 target gene. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    tGLI1 protein binds to the CD24 promoter and activates CD24 gene expression. A and B, tGLI1, but not GLI1, binds to the promoter of the CD24 gene. Regular (A) and quantitative (B) chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was done to determine the binding affinity of GLI1 and tGLI1 to promoters of the CD24 gene. Mouse IgG was used as negative immunoprecipitation controls. Chromatin inputs were used as PCR templates to control for loading. CD24 promoter fragments were visualized in agarose gels showing the binding of tGLI1 to the CD24 promoter (A). B, mean ± SD of three independent quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. P values were determined using the Student's t test. Right, representative amplification plot. C, tGLI1 activates the CD24 promoter via a 0.06 kb region. Three U87MG stable transfectants were transfected with five reporter constructs, the expression of which is driven by successively truncated CD24 promoter. The parental vector, pGL3-basic, was used as a baseline control. Mean ± SD of three independent experiments. D, tGLI1 is associated with increased CD24 expression in vivo. Using U87MG-GLI1 (n = 3) and U87MG-tGLI1 (n = 3) xenografts established in the flanks of nude mice, immunohistochemistry showed that CD24 expression was significantly higher in U87MG-tGLI1 tumors than U87MG-GLI1 xenografts (representative tumors shown in top). U87MG-tGLI1 tumors are more invasive than U87MG-GLI1 counterparts as indicated by H&E staining and by increased infiltration of U8MG-tGLI1 cells into the smooth muscles (sm). Bottom, RT-PCR results that confirmed expression of GLI1 and tGLI1 transcripts in U87MG-GLI1 and U87MG-tGLI1 xenografts, respectively.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    CD24 expression is required for tGLI1-mediated GBM cell migration and invasiveness. A and B, suppression of CD24 expression reduces migratory ability and invasiveness of U87MG-tGLI1 cells. U87MG-tGLI1 cells were transfected with CD24-specific and control nonspecific siRNAs, whereas U87MG-GLI1 cells were only exposed to control siRNA. RT-PCR and immunoblotting (A, top) showed a significant down-regulation of CD24 expression in the CD24 siRNA-treated cells. Forty-eight hours following transfection, cells were examined for proliferation and migration using the scratch wound assay (A, bottom) and for invasiveness (B) using invasion assay. Net invasiveness was determined by computing the ratio of invasiveness over proliferation. To note, the exposure to the transfection reagent and siRNA may have caused tumor cells to appear less confluent than the untransfected counterparts in Fig. 3A and B. C and D, increased CD24 expression promotes GBM migration and invasiveness. U87MG cells with an undetectable level of CD24 were transfected with control or CD24 vectors. RT-PCR for CD24 transcripts showed increased CD24 expression in CD24 vector-transfected cells but that those with control vector as shown by RT-PCR and immunoblotting (C, left). Forty-eight hours following transfection, the cells were examined for proliferation. There was no effect of CD24 overexpression on proliferation of U87MG cells. In contrast, there was a significant increase in the migratory ability (C, right; scratch wound assay) and invasiveness (D; invasion assay) of the CD24-overexpressing U87MG cells compared with control cells. Net invasiveness was determined by computing the ratio of invasiveness over proliferation.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data, Lo, et al.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Figures 1-4, Tables 1-2
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 69 (17)
September 2009
Volume 69, Issue 17
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Novel Splice Variant of GLI1 That Promotes Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Invasion
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Novel Splice Variant of GLI1 That Promotes Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Invasion
Hui-Wen Lo, Hu Zhu, Xinyu Cao, Amy Aldrich and Francis Ali-Osman
Cancer Res September 1 2009 (69) (17) 6790-6798; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0886

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Novel Splice Variant of GLI1 That Promotes Glioblastoma Cell Migration and Invasion
Hui-Wen Lo, Hu Zhu, Xinyu Cao, Amy Aldrich and Francis Ali-Osman
Cancer Res September 1 2009 (69) (17) 6790-6798; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0886
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Diversity in Proadhesive Signaling Mechanisms in B-CLL Lymphocytes
  • Role of ATM Phosphorylation in Exon 11 of BRCA1
  • Methylated Genes in TGF-β Signaling in HNSCC
Show more Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement