Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Immunology

Lineage-Specific T-Cell Responses to Cancer Mucosa Antigen Oppose Systemic Metastases without Mucosal Inflammatory Disease

Adam E. Snook, Peng Li, Benjamin J. Stafford, Elizabeth J. Faul, Lan Huang, Ruth C. Birbe, Alessandro Bombonati, Stephanie Schulz, Matthias J. Schnell, Laurence C. Eisenlohr and Scott A. Waldman
Adam E. Snook
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peng Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin J. Stafford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth J. Faul
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lan Huang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth C. Birbe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Bombonati
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Schulz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias J. Schnell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurence C. Eisenlohr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott A. Waldman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3386 Published April 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    GCC-specific CD4+ T-cell and antibody tolerance. A, GCC-specific CD4+ T-cell responses in Control-AV– or GCC-AV–immunized GCC+/+ (+/+) and GCC−/− (−/−) C57BL/6 mice, measured by IFNγ ELISpot following restimulation with recombinant GCC-6xHis protein (*, P < 0.05, two-sided Student's t test on values at 50 μg/mL). B, AV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses in GCC-AV–immunized GCC+/+ (+/+) and GCC−/− (−/−) C57BL/6 mice, measured by IFNγ ELISpot following restimulation with AV particles (#, P > 0.05, two-sided Student's t test on values at 1 × 108 IFU/mL). Data in A and B indicate pooled analysis of n = 2–3 mice per group and are representative of four independent experiments. C, ELISA analysis of GCC-specific IgG antibody responses in GCC+/+ (+/+) or GCC−/− (−/−) C57BL/6 mice 14 d after immunization with GCC-AV or Control-AV. Columns, mean of n = 3 mice per group at reciprocal serum dilutions of 25, 50, 100, and 200 (***, P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA). Representative of three independent experiments. D, ELISA analysis of AV-specific IgG antibody responses in naïve GCC+/+ (+/+) or GCC−/− (−/−) C57BL/6 mice or 10 to 14 d after immunization with AV. Columns, mean of n = 4 AV-immunized mice per genotype or pooled samples of three naïve mice per genotype at reciprocal serum dilutions of 100, 200, 400, and 800 (***, P < 0.001; #, P > 0.1, two-way ANOVA). Bars, SD (A–D).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    GCC-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. A, GCC-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in GCC+/+ C57BL/6 mice following LacZ-AV (control) or GCC-AV immunization, measured by IFNγ ELISpot using GCC-expressing colorectal cancer cells as stimulators. B, β-galactosidase–specific CD8+ T-cell responses in GCC+/+ C57BL/6 mice following LacZ-AV or GCC-AV (control) immunization, measured by IFNγ ELISpot using β-galactosidase–expressing colorectal cancer cells as stimulators. Data in A and B indicate pooled analysis of n = 2 mice per group and are representative of six independent experiments (***, P < 0.001, two-sided Student's t test). C, GCC-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in GCC+/+ (+/+) and GCC−/− (−/−) C57BL/6 mice following GCC-AV immunization, measured by IFNγ ELISpot as in A. Data indicate pooled analysis of n = 2 mice per group and are representative of two independent experiments (**, P < 0.01, two-sided Student's t test). D, SIINFEKL-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in GCC+/+ (+/+) and GCC−/− (−/−) C57BL/6 mice following NP/SIINFEKL-AV immunization, measured by IFNγ ELISpot on restimulation with SIINFEKL-expressing stimulator cells. Representative of three independent experiments examining SIINFEKL- or β-galactosidase–specific responses (#, P > 0.9, two-sided Student's t test). Bars, SD (A–D).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    GCC-specific immunotherapy against colon cancer metastases in lung. BALB/c mice were immunized with Control-AV or GCC-AV and then challenged with 5 × 105 CT26-GCC cells by tail vein injection 7 d later. A, on day 14 after challenge, metastases were visualized by PET/microCT. Images indicate merged PET and microCT images and lungs are outlined for clarity. Images are representative of n = 5–7 mice per immunization. B, lungs were removed and stained with India ink to visualize lung nodules. C, lung nodules were enumerated on visual inspection. Columns, mean of n = 12 mice per immunization; bars, 95% confidence intervals (***, P < 0.001, two-sided Student's t test).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    GCC immunization does not intensify mucosal autoimmunity in experimental colitis. A, female C57BL/6 mice were immunized with Control-AV or GCC-AV and boosted sequentially with RV and VV at 28-d intervals. Four days later, mice were treated with a 7-d course of 4% DSS ad libitum in the drinking water, followed by normal water. Mouse weights were monitored daily. Points, mean; bars, 95% confidence intervals (P > 0.05, Bonferroni's multiple comparison's test on area under the curve values, control versus GCC-immunized DSS treatment groups; Supplementary Fig. S2). B to D, some mice were euthanized on day 9 for examination of disease markers including diarrhea (B), fecal blood (C), and histology (D). D1, representative sections from treated mice; D2, histologic scores from treated mice. B to D, columns, mean of n = 5 mice per group; bars, SD (#, P > 0.05, Bonferroni's multiple comparison test).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    GCC-specific immunization does not amplify tumorigenesis in genetic and inflammatory models of colorectal cancer. A to C, APCmin/+ C57BL/6 mice were immunized with Control-AV or GCC-AV and boosted sequentially with RV and VV at 28-d intervals beginning at 4 wk of age. Two weeks after the final immunization, intestines were collected and examined by histology (A), and tumor burden was quantified in small (B) and large (C) intestines. Bars, 95% confidence intervals (#, P > 0.05, two-sided Welch's t test). D to F, female C57BL/6 mice were immunized with Control-AV or GCC-AV and boosted sequentially with RV and VV at 28-d intervals beginning at 6 wk of age. The procarcinogen axozymethane was administered 3 d before the final immunization. Seven days later, three cycles of DSS were initiated with 14 d of water between each cycle. D, colons were collected 10 d after the final cycle and examined. Tumor number (E) and tumor size (F) were determined under a dissecting microscope. Bars, 95% confidence intervals (#, P > 0.05, two-sided Welch's t test).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Histology of colitis-associated colorectal tumors

    ImmunizationTubular adenoma (%)Carcinoma in situ (%) *
    Control80.419.6
    GCC75.025.0 †
    • ↵* Percentage of histologically confirmed tumors.

    • ↵† P = 0.5184, Fisher's exact test.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 69 (8)
April 2009
Volume 69, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lineage-Specific T-Cell Responses to Cancer Mucosa Antigen Oppose Systemic Metastases without Mucosal Inflammatory Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lineage-Specific T-Cell Responses to Cancer Mucosa Antigen Oppose Systemic Metastases without Mucosal Inflammatory Disease
Adam E. Snook, Peng Li, Benjamin J. Stafford, Elizabeth J. Faul, Lan Huang, Ruth C. Birbe, Alessandro Bombonati, Stephanie Schulz, Matthias J. Schnell, Laurence C. Eisenlohr and Scott A. Waldman
Cancer Res April 15 2009 (69) (8) 3537-3544; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3386

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lineage-Specific T-Cell Responses to Cancer Mucosa Antigen Oppose Systemic Metastases without Mucosal Inflammatory Disease
Adam E. Snook, Peng Li, Benjamin J. Stafford, Elizabeth J. Faul, Lan Huang, Ruth C. Birbe, Alessandro Bombonati, Stephanie Schulz, Matthias J. Schnell, Laurence C. Eisenlohr and Scott A. Waldman
Cancer Res April 15 2009 (69) (8) 3537-3544; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3386
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Abstract 6641: In situ immunization with the TLR9-agonist CMP-001 enhances anti-PD1 therapy in head and neck tumors
  • Abstract 6636: Therapy with BXCL701 (B), a DPP8, DPP9, DPPIV and FAP inhibitor, in combination with anti-PD1 antibody (PD1) in a syngeneic murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) model improves treatment outcomes and induces intratumoral NK cell infiltrates and a marked reduction in tumor stromal fibrosis
  • Abstract 6593: PRGN-3005 UltraCAR-T™: multigenic CAR-T cells generated using non-viral gene delivery and rapid manufacturing process for the treatment of ovarian cancer
Show more Immunology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement