Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Therapeutics, Targets, and Chemical Biology

The Somatostatin Analogue Octreotide Confers Sensitivity to Rapamycin Treatment on Pituitary Tumor Cells

Vesna Cerovac, Jose Monteserin-Garcia, Hadara Rubinfeld, Michael Buchfelder, Marco Losa, Tullio Florio, Marcelo Paez-Pereda, Günter K. Stalla and Marily Theodoropoulou
Vesna Cerovac
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jose Monteserin-Garcia
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hadara Rubinfeld
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Buchfelder
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Losa
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tullio Florio
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcelo Paez-Pereda
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Günter K. Stalla
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marily Theodoropoulou
1Department of Endocrinology, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry; 2Affectis Pharmaceuticals, Munich, Germany; 3Institute of Endocrinology and Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurosurgical Department, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and 6Department of Oncology, Biology and Genetics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2951 Published January 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rapamycin and its analogues have significant antiproliferative action against a variety of tumors. However, sensitivity to rapamycin is reduced by Akt activation that results from the ablative effects of rapamycin on a p70 S6K–induced negative feedback loop that blunts phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–mediated support for Akt activity. Thus, sensitivity to rapamycin might be increased by imposing an upstream blockade to the PI3K/Akt pathway. Here, we investigated this model using the somatostatin analogue octreotide as a tool to decrease levels of activated Ser473-phosphorylated Akt (pAkt-Ser473) in pituitary tumor cells that express somatostatin receptors. Octreotide increased levels of phosphorylated insulin receptor substrate-1 that were suppressed by rapamycin, subsequently decreasing levels of pAkt-Ser473 through effects on phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. Octreotide potentiated the antiproliferative effects of rapamycin in immortalized pituitary tumor cells or human nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma cells in primary cell culture, sensitizing tumor cells even to low rapamycin concentrations. Combined treatment of octreotide and rapamycin triggered G1 cell cycle arrest, decreasing E2F transcriptional activity and cyclin E levels by increasing levels of p27/Kip1. These findings show that adjuvant treatment with a somatostatin analogue can sensitize pituitary tumor cells to the antiproliferative effects of rapamycin. Cancer Res; 70(2); 666–74

Keywords
  • Octreotide
  • rapamycin
  • IRS-1
  • p27/Kip1
  • pituitary

Introduction

The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway is frequently overactivated in a variety of tumors either by mutations or by growth factors (1). It plays a crucial role in tumor formation and progression by controlling cell growth, proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis (2, 3). Growth factor–bound tyrosine kinase receptors with the help of adaptors, such as insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), recruit the PI3K regulatory subunit p85 and activate PI3K and, subsequently, PDK1, Akt, and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).

Rapamycin is a mTOR inhibitor with potent immunosuppressant and antiproliferative properties. Rapamycin and its analogues (rapalogs) are effective against solid tumors presenting with overactivated PI3K/Akt pathway (4, 5). In contrast, rapalogs displayed modest efficacy in clinical trials (6). Analysis of breast cancer biopsies derived from patients treated with RAD001 revealed increased Akt phosphorylation (7). The mTOR target p70 S6K phosphorylates IRS-1 at serine residues, leading to its dissociation from tyrosine kinase receptors and inhibition of the PI3K signaling (8–11). Rapamycin and its analogues by inhibiting mTOR decrease p70 S6K serine phosphorylation and abolish this inhibitory feedback loop to IRS-1, resulting in the observed increased Akt phosphorylation (7, 12, 13). Therefore, cotreatment with an agent able to decrease Akt phosphorylation could overcome rapamycin-induced Akt phosphorylation upstreams and improve the antiproliferative action of rapamycin analogue treatment.

Somatostatin receptor type 2 (Sst2) was shown to deactivate the PI3K pathway by inhibiting p85 tyrosine phosphorylation and decreasing Akt phosphorylation (14, 15). Somatostatin analogues targeting Sst2, such as octreotide and lanreotide, are frequently used for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (16).

In the present study, addition of the somatostatin analogue octreotide to rapamycin increased serine-phosphorylated IRS-1 levels, decreased rapamycin-induced pAkt-Ser473 levels, and enhanced the antiproliferative effect of rapamycin in immortalized pituitary tumor cells and in human nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) in primary cell culture by upregulating p27/Kip1.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Cell culture materials were purchased from Life Technologies, Nunc, and Sigma. Octreotide was provided by the American Peptide Co.; phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, MG132, and rapamycin were from Sigma. Lithium chloride and SB415286 were from Calbiochem. Octreotide was dissolved in 0.01 mol/L acetic acid, and rapamycin and SB415286 were dissolved in DMSO.

Tumors

This study was approved by the Max Planck Institute ethics committee, and informed consent was received from each patient or from their relatives. Twenty-eight NFPAs were included. The tumors were removed through transsphenoidal surgery and diagnosed by clinical, biochemical, radiological, and surgical findings.

Cell culture

Postsurgical specimens were washed with HDB buffer [15 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4), 137 mmol NaCl, 5 mmol/L KCl, 0.7 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 10 mmol/L glucose, 2.5 mg/mL amphotericin B, 105 units/L penicillin/streptomycin] and enzymatically dispersed as previously described (17). d-Valine was used to suppress the growth of contaminating fibroblasts (17). Cell viability over 80% was acceptable, as determined by the acridine orange and ethidium bromide staining. Cells were seeded in 48-well plates (100,000 per well) and left for 48 h.

The immortalized pituitary tumor cell lines GH3 and AtT-20 (American Type Culture Collection) were used. Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 nmol/L glutamine, 0.5 mg/L partricin, and 105 units/L penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Proliferation studies

[3H]thymidine incorporation ([3H]TdR) was performed as previously described (18). Cells were treated with rapamycin, octreotide, and their combination at the indicated times for each experiment concentrations in the presence of [3H]thymidine (0.5 μCi/mL) for 24 h. Cells treated with the carriers in which octreotide and rapamycin were dissolved were used as control. Cell proliferation was also assessed using the nonradioactive colorimetric WST-1 assay (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as previously described (19). All treatments were carried out in quadruplicates.

Colony formation

Anchorage-independent colony formation was determined as previously described (19). AtT-20 cells were treated for 24 h, suspended in 0.3% melted agar, and plated on 0.5% agar. The cultures were incubated for 20 d and stained with MTT to show the presence of viable cells under all treatments at the end of the experiment.

Flow cytometry

Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry after propidium iodide staining as previously described (20). Cells were serum deprived for 24 h and treated for 24 h with octreotide, rapamycin, and their combination. The vehicle in which the substances were dissolved was used as control. Analysis was done in FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) using the CellQuest and ModFit softwares.

RNA extraction and semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR

RNA was extracted by the guanidinium isothiocyanate–phenol method. PCR for β-actin was performed on 1 μg RNA to exclude genomic DNA contamination. RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using random hexanucleotides and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed for p27/Kip1 (sense: 5′-agggcagatacgagtggcag-3′, antisense: 5′-ctggacactgctccgctaacc-3′) and β-actin (internal control) under restrictive conditions as previously described (21). Each RT-PCR was performed in RNA extracted from three independent experiments.

Western blot

AtT-20 cells were treated with 1 nmol/L octreotide, 1 nmol/L rapamycin, and their combination for the times indicated for each experiment. DMSO was added to the control (untreated) and single octreotide treatment. Cell lysates were prepared in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Samples were separated by PAGE and blotted using standard procedures (22).

Primary antibodies were against cyclin D1, cyclin D3, cyclin E, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2, CDK4, and CDK6 (all made in mouse; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.); retinoblastoma (Rb; made in mouse; BD Pharmingen); pRb-Ser780, p27/Kip1, Akt, and pAkt-Ser473 (all made in rabbit; Cell Signaling); IRS-1 (Upstate); pIRS-1-Ser636/639 (Cell Signaling); and pAkt-Ser473 (mouse monoclonal; Calbiochem). Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated secondary antibodies were used (Cell Signaling). Each experiment was performed in duplicates.

Coimmunoprecipitation

AtT-20 cells were treated with octreotide, rapamycin, and their combination for 5 min and collected in ice-cold lysis buffer [150 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4), 1 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% NP40]. Protein (600 μg) was immunoprecipitated with an antibody against IRS-1 (Upstate) or with a control rabbit IgG. Protein A–Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used as previously described (15). The immunoprecipitates were extensively washed, and protein bound to Sepharose was eluted and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Western blot was performed using the HRP-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 (Upstate), anti-phosphoserine (Zymed), or anti–IRS-1 antibody (Upstate). Coimmunoprecipitation was performed in two independent experiments and repeated using protein G–Sepharose.

Transfection and reporter assays

The SHP-1/C453S dominant-negative mutant (SHP-1dn; ref. 23) and the constitutively active myristoylated Akt (Myr-Akt; ref. 24) were used. Cell transfection was performed with SuperFect (Qiagen GmbH). Cells (3 × 105) were transfected for 3 h with 1 μg of SHP-1dn plasmid, left in cell growth medium overnight, and treated with octreotide alone or in combination with rapamycin. Lysates of cells treated for 3 h were analyzed for pAkt-Ser473 and pIRS-1-Ser636/639 by Western blot. Each transfection experiment was performed in duplicates. To confirm the SHP-1dn and Myr-Akt incorporation, Western blot was performed for hemagglutinin (Acris).

The E2F-Luc construct (Mercury pathway profiling system, Clontech Laboratories, Inc.) has the E2F-responsive element upstream to the TATA box of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter and the reporter gene luciferase. Cells transfected with E2F-Luc were treated with octreotide, rapamycin, and their combination for 6 h, and luciferase activity was measured by a Berthold luminometer. Transfection efficiency was determined using the Rous sarcoma virus–β-gal construct as described previously (19). Data are expressed as the ratio of E2F relative luciferase activity (RLA) to β-gal activity. Each experiment was performed in triplicates.

RNA interference

Double-stranded small interfering RNA (siRNA) against mouse p27/Kip1 (Cdkn1b) was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. One scrambled siRNA (Scramble II; MWG Biotech) was used as a control.

AtT-20 cells were transfected with 100 nmol/L scrambled siRNA or siRNA against p27/Kip1 using SuperFect for 3 h and left in cell growth medium overnight to recover. The day after, they were split and distributed for proliferation assays and for RNA extraction. Cells for RNA extraction were harvested at the same time with the proliferation assay (i.e., 48 h after transfection with the siRNA). Each experiment was performed twice.

Statistics

All the [3H]TdR results were assessed by one-way ANOVA in combination with Scheffé's test. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Octreotide reverses rapamycin-induced increase in Akt phosphorylation

To identify a cell model to test our hypothesis, the presence of the feedback of rapamycin on Akt phosphorylation was determined in two immortalized pituitary tumor cell lines: AtT-20 and GH3. Treatment with 1 nmol/L rapamycin increased pAkt-Ser473 levels in AtT-20 cells (Fig. 1A), whereas it had no effect in GH3 cells, confirming our previous study (20). Based on these results, AtT-20 cells were used as experimental model of rapamycin-resistant cells. In these cells, addition of 1 nmol/L octreotide to rapamycin treatment decreased pAkt-Ser473 levels. This observation shows that octreotide affects the feedback loop of rapamycin on Akt phosphorylation.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, AtT-20 cell lysates treated with DMSO (CT), 1 nmol/L octreotide plus DMSO (Oct), 1 nmol/L rapamycin (Rap), and 1 nmol/L octreotide plus 1 nmol/L rapamycin for 3 h analyzed by Western blot using anti-Akt and anti–pAkt-Ser473. Representatives of three experiments are shown. B, AtT-20 cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with protein A–Sepharose and anti–IRS-1 or a control rabbit IgG. The immunoprecipitated fractions were analyzed by Western blot using anti-phosphoserine (p-Ser), anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 [p-Tyr(4G10)], and anti–IRS-1. Representatives of two experiments are shown. n.a., not applicable. C, AtT-20 cell lysates treated with DMSO (CT), 1 nmol/L octreotide plus DMSO (Oct), 1 nmol/L rapamycin, and 1 nmol/L octreotide plus 1 nmol/L rapamycin for 3 h analyzed by Western blot using anti–pIRS-1-Ser636/639 and anti–IRS-1. Representatives of three experiments are shown.

Octreotide treatment inhibits the action of rapamycin on IRS-1

The rapamycin-induced increase in pAkt-Ser473 and subsequent resistance to its antiproliferative action were suggested to arise from the elimination of the negative feedback of the mTOR target p70 S6K on IRS-1 (Supplementary Fig. S1). In line with this hypothesis, herein, it is shown that treatment with octreotide increases the levels of IRS-1 detected with the phosphoserine antibody, which had been decreased by rapamycin (Fig. 1B). In contrast, octreotide suppressed IRS-1 levels detected with the 4G10 phosphotyrosine antibody (Fig. 1B), as was previously shown (14). Furthermore, rapamycin was found to decrease pIRS-1-Ser636/639 levels and addition of octreotide eliminated this effect (Fig. 1C).

Octreotide was shown to transduce its effects on IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation through SHP-1. Transfection with a catalytically inactive SHP-1 abolished the mediated increase of octreotide in pIRS-1-Ser636/639 levels (Fig. 2A) and decrease in pAkt-Ser473 levels (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Control-transfected and SHP-1dn–transfected AtT-20 cell lysates treated with DMSO (CT) and 1 nmol/L octreotide plus 1 nmol/L rapamycin analyzed by Western blot using anti–pIRS-1-Ser636/639 and anti–IRS-1 (A) and anti-Akt and anti–pAkt-Ser473 (B). Representatives of two independent transfection experiments are shown.

Octreotide treatment did not affect the suppressed p70 S6K of rapamycin (Supplementary Fig. S2). Rapamycin also decreased mTOR phosphorylation at the Ser2448 and Ser2481 sites.

These data show that octreotide increases serine-phosphorylated IRS-1 levels and decreases pAkt-Ser473, in a mechanism involving SHP-1, and suggest that it could improve the antiproliferative action of rapamycin.

Antiproliferative action of the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment in immortalized pituitary tumor cells

Rapamycin treatment had a small antiproliferative effect in AtT-20 cells at 1 nmol/L concentration (25% growth suppression; P < 0.05) and no effect at lower doses (Fig. 3A). In these cells, addition of 1 nmol/L octreotide to 1 nmol/L rapamycin led to 50% inhibition, as determined by both [3H]TdR (Supplementary Fig. S3A) and a nonradioactive colorimetric assay (P < 0.001 versus vehicle control, and P = 0.003 versus rapamycin alone; Fig. 3B). The antiproliferative effect of the combined treatment remained even at lower rapamycin concentrations (P < 0.01). Octreotide alone had a mild antiproliferative effect (20% growth suppression; P < 0.01).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Antiproliferative effect of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 nmol/L of rapamycin alone (A) or in combination with 1 nmol/L octreotide (B) in AtT-20 cells. Treatments were performed in 10% FCS-DMEM. Cell proliferation was determined after 24-h treatment. Data are presented as percentage of each vehicle-treated control. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.001. Each measurement was done in four independent wells. C, [3H]TdR uptake inhibition in human NFPA in primary cell culture treated with 1 nmol/L rapamycin and 1 nmol/L rapamycin plus 1 nmol/L octreotide; mean of eight NFPAs that were responsive to single rapamycin treatment and mean of 20 NFPAs nonresponsive to the antiproliferative action of rapamycin. D, dose curve study on 6 of 28 NFPAs treated with 0.01, 0.1, and 1 nmol/L of rapamycin alone or in combination with 1 nmol/L octreotide. All treatments were performed in 10% FCS-DMEM supplemented with d-valine. Data are expressed as percentage of vehicle-treated control. Points, mean; bars, SE. Each measurement was done in four independent wells.

To confirm the sensitivity of AtT-20 cells to the combined treatment, a soft agar colony formation assay was used. A 24-hour treatment with the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment inhibited anchorage-independent colony formation in AtT-20 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3B).

Antiproliferative action of the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment in human pituitary tumors in primary cell culture

The antiproliferative efficacy of the combined treatment was tested in human NFPA in primary cell culture. In NFPA, Akt is overactivated (25) so these tumors could benefit from rapamycin treatment. Treating NFPA in primary cell culture with 1 nmol/L rapamycin decreased proliferation by <20% in 8 of 28 tumors (mean suppression of [3H]TdR incorporation as % of vehicle control: 27 ± 6; Fig. 3C). Addition of 1 nmol/L octreotide further suppressed proliferation (% mean suppression: 44 ± 13), and the suppressive effect of the combined rapamycin-octreotide treatment was significantly higher than that of rapamycin alone (P = 0.009) in these eight tumors.

However, most of the NFPAs (20 of 28) did not respond to 1 nmol/L rapamycin alone (Fig. 3C), displaying resistance to this treatment. Combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment in these tumors significantly reduced proliferation in all cases (% mean suppression: 38 ± 13; P < 0.001). Altogether, all 28 NFPAs responded to the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment, with [3H]TdR inhibition ranging from 20% to 74%.

In six tumors that provided enough cells for dose-response studies, the suppressive action of the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment (1 nmol/L; % mean suppression: 45 ± 17; P = 0.018) happened after adding concentrations of rapamycin as low as 0.1 nmol/L and 0.01 to 1 nmol/L octreotide [% mean suppression: 43 ± 22 (P = 0.037) and 42 ± 21 (P = 0.019), respectively; Fig. 3D].

Single octreotide treatment did not suppress proliferation in most NFPAs, similar to what has been extensively reported in previous studies. Seven of 28 NFPAs responded to 1 nmol/L octreotide (% mean suppression: 26 ± 5). Addition of 1 nmol/L rapamycin to octreotide in these seven cases had a significantly higher antiproliferative effect compared with octreotide alone (% mean suppression: 50 ± 18; P = 0.007; Supplementary Fig. S3C).

Effect of combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment on cell cycle components

Both rapamycin and octreotide are cytostatic (26–28), and the combined treatment accumulated the cells in the G0-G1 phase (Supplementary Fig. S4A). Therefore, the mechanism behind the superior antiproliferative action of their combination was sought among the proteins important for the G1-S cell cycle transition. Cell cycle progression starts with the activation of D-type cyclins and their associated kinases CDK4 and CDK6 (29). Rapamycin alone or in combination with octreotide decreased cyclin D1, cyclin D3, CDK4, and CDK6 (Fig. 4A), whereas octreotide alone had no effect and did not potentiate the effect of rapamycin, suggesting that the potent antiproliferative action of the combined treatment is not due to a more potent suppression of D-type cyclins.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

AtT-20 cell lysates treated with DMSO (CT), 1 nmol/L octreotide plus DMSO (Oct), 1 nmol/L rapamycin, and 1 nmol/L octreotide plus 1 nmol/L rapamycin for 24 h analyzed by Western blot using anti–cyclin D1, anti–cyclin D3, anti-CDK4, anti-CDK6, and anti-CDK2 (A) and anti–pRb-Ser780 (B). Representative β-actin is shown. Cells were serum deprived for 24 h before treatment. Treatments were contacted in the presence of 10% FCS. Representatives of three experiments are shown. C, effect of 6-h treatment with 1 nmol/L octreotide, 1 nmol/L rapamycin, and their combination on E2F-mediated transcription in AtT-20 cells transfected with E2F-Luc. Results are shown as E2F RLA to β-gal ratio. Each experiment was repeated twice. *, P < 0.05; #, P = 0.012. D, Western blot for cyclin E. The membrane blotted for CDK2 (shown in A) was used after stripping with 100 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 2.0).

The G1 to S transition is primarily governed by the cyclin E/CDK2 complex (30). Single and combined rapamycin treatment decreased CDK2 protein levels (Fig. 4A). Cyclin E/CDK2 complexes act by hyperphosphorylating and inhibiting Rb. The resulting pRb dissociates from E2F transcription factors, leading to increased E2F-driven gene transcription (31). Rapamycin decreased Rb phosphorylation levels, but addition of octreotide almost eliminated them (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment reduced E2F transcriptional activity more potently than rapamycin alone (P = 0.012; Fig. 4C), whereas octreotide alone had a small effect, which did not reach statistical significance. E2F transcription factors drive the transcription of several genes, whose products are important for the transition to the S phase, including cyclin E. The combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment decreased cyclin E protein expression more potently than each individual treatment alone (Fig. 4D). Single octreotide treatment decreased cyclin E, similar to what was reported for the somatostatin analogue RC-160 in CHO/SSTR2 cells (23) and somatostatin in pancreatic acinar cells (32). Treatment with the protease inhibitor MG132 did not affect cyclin E suppression after single or combined octreotide and rapamycin treatment (Supplementary Fig. S4B).

These results suggest that the combined treatment decreases E2F transcriptional activity and cyclin E transcription, prohibiting the tumor cells from entering the S phase of the cell cycle. However, the rapamycin-induced decrease in CDK2 levels alone cannot explain the better suppressive effect of the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment on E2F transcriptional activity and cyclin E transcription.

The combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment upregulates p27/Kip1

The primary regulator of the cyclin E/CDK2 complex is the cyclin kinase inhibitor p27/Kip1. Single octreotide and rapamycin treatments increased p27/Kip1 protein levels, similar to what was described in previous studies (23, 33), but their combination had a stronger effect on p27/Kip1 transcript (Supplementary Fig. S5A) and protein levels (Fig. 5A). These data suggest that increased p27/Kip1 transcription is an adjuvant mechanism by which the combined treatment exerts its superior antiproliferative action. Indeed, knocking down p27/Kip1 abolished the antiproliferative action of the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment without affecting that of the single rapamycin treatment (Supplementary Fig. S5B). Furthermore, adding octreotide to rapamycin treatment in the GH3 cells, which do not express p27/Kip1 (34), did not enhance the antiproliferative effect of rapamycin (Supplementary Fig. S5C).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Western blot for p27/Kip1 on AtT-20 cell lysates treated with DMSO (CT), 1 nmol/L octreotide plus DMSO (Oct), 1 nmol/L rapamycin, and 1 nmol/L octreotide plus 1 nmol/L rapamycin for 24 h (A); SHP-1dn–transfected (B) and Myr-Akt–transfected (C) AtT-20 cell lysates treated with DMSO (CT), 1 nmol/L octreotide plus DMSO (Oct), and 1 nmol/L rapamycin; and AtT-20 cell lysates treated as in B and C in the presence of the GSKβ inhibitor SB415286 (14 μmol/L; D).

The stronger effect of the combined treatment on p27/Kip1 indicates that the two drugs may induce p27/Kip1 through different pathways. The stimulatory effect of octreotide on basal and rapamycin-induced p27/Kip1 was not observed in AtT-20 cells transfected with SHP-1dn (Fig. 5B) or with a constitutively active Myr-Akt (Fig. 5C), whereas neither intervention affected rapamycin. Instead, the stimulatory action of rapamycin on p27/Kip1 was blocked after inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) with 20 mmol/L lithium chloride (Supplementary Fig. S5D) or 14 μmol/L of the selective inhibitor SB415286 (Fig. 5D).

Discussion

Resistance to cytotoxic and cytostatic treatments is a common limitation in cancer treatment. Rapamycin resistance was in part attributed to the rapamycin-induced increase in pAkt-Ser473 levels, which was documented in vitro and in vivo on biopsies of patients treated with the rapalog RAD001 (7) and was found to derive from the elimination of the negative feedback loop of the mTOR target p70 S6K on the PI3K pathway. In the present study, we sought to suppress the PI3K pathway upstreams with a somatostatin analogue that was previously shown to target this pathway (14, 15) to restore the control of Akt and therefore induce sensitivity to rapamycin treatment.

The serine/threonine kinase p70 S6K phosphorylates IRS-1 at serine residues, causing its inactivation. Rapamycin, by inhibiting mTOR, decreases p70 S6K activity and reduces serine IRS-1 phosphorylation, leading to its activation. Octreotide was previously reported to inhibit IRS-1 by decreasing its tyrosine phosphorylation levels through the phosphotyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 (14). Herein, we show that it also increases IRS-1 serine phosphorylation levels and, in particular, pIRS-1-Ser636/639, which is the site primarily phosphorylated by p70 S6K. Interestingly, this effect was also SHP-1 dependent. Tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 was previously reported to bind to another phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTP2C) and to get dephosphorylated and inhibited through this association (35). Whether SHP-1 plays a similar role in regulating IRS-1 remains to be determined. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the basal levels of pIRS-Ser636/639 in the cells transfected with the catalytically inactive SHP-1 were higher than those of the control cells, suggesting that changes in tyrosine phosphorylation undermine the IRS-1 serine phosphorylation status.

Single and combined rapamycin treatment decreased mTOR phosphorylation at both Ser2448 and Ser2481, similar to previous studies (36). However, the rapamycin-suppressed p70 S6K phosphorylation was not altered by cotreatment with octreotide, indicating that the effect of octreotide on rapamycin-induced IRS-1 is not due to an action of the drug on p70 S6K.

Octreotide enhanced the antiproliferative action of rapamycin in immortalized mouse pituitary tumor cells that responded poorly to the antiproliferative action of rapamycin and in human pituitary tumors in primary cell culture. The present study focused on NFPAs, which were shown to display high levels of activated Akt compared with normal pituitary or with other pituitary tumor types and could therefore be a good candidate for treatment with rapamycin (25). In our study, more than half of the cases could not respond to rapamycin, suggesting resistance to this treatment. It is noteworthy that addition of octreotide improved the antiproliferative action of rapamycin not only in rapamycin-resistant tumors but also in rapamycin responders. The improvement of the antiproliferative action of rapamycin by octreotide was not due to its own growth-inhibiting effect in NFPA because only few cases responded to single octreotide treatment, reflecting in vitro (37) and in vivo (38–40) observations. Interestingly, the superior effect of the combined treatment was present even at low rapamycin concentrations. These findings suggest that the same antiproliferative effect can be achieved at lower pharmacologic doses of the rapamycin analogs, which is of clinical importance considering their relative toxicity at high doses (41).

Searching for mechanisms mediating the superior antiproliferative effect of the combined treatment downstream to IRS-1/Akt suppression, we focused on the G1-S cell cycle transition because the combined treatment arrested the cells in the G0-G1 phase. Rapamycin decreased cyclin D1, cyclin D3, CDK4, CDK6, and CDK2 similar to what was described in previous studies (42–44). Addition of octreotide did not potentiate this action, but it nevertheless suppressed Rb phosphorylation, E2F transcriptional activity, and the E2F transcriptional target cyclin E more potently than rapamycin treatment alone. Both octreotide and rapamycin were previously shown to suppress cyclin E (20, 32, 45, 46), so this finding is not surprising. However, these data collectively indicate a strong inhibitory action on CDK2 activity, upstream to cyclin E, which cannot be explained only by the rapamycin-induced decrease in CDK2. Cyclin E/CDK2 activity is negatively regulated primarily by the cell-dependent kinase inhibitor p27/Kip1, which was previously reported to be upregulated by octreotide and rapamycin (23, 33). Nevertheless, the combination of the two drugs strongly enhanced p27/Kip1 expression, providing with an additional mechanism for its superior antiproliferative action downstreams at cell cycle level. Indeed, cells in which p27/Kip1 was knocked down or do not express p27, such as the GH3 cells, failed to better respond to the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment compared with the individual treatments.

The extent of the p27/Kip1 upregulation after the combined octreotide-rapamycin treatment suggests that the two drugs may use different pathways to induce this cell cycle inhibitor. The action of octreotide on p27/Kip1 was SHP-1 dependent, reflecting previous studies in pituitary tumor cells (15). Interestingly, Akt overexpression also abolished the stimulatory effect of octreotide, indicating that Akt overactivation may block the cytostatic action of octreotide in pituitary tumor cells. Indeed, Akt overexpression eliminated the antiproliferative action of octreotide in the AtT-20 pituitary tumor cells (Supplementary Fig. S6). These data raise the interesting possibility that Sst2-expressing tumors with overactivated Akt may be more resistant to the antiproliferative action of somatostatin analogues that target mainly this receptor, such as octreotide and lanreotide. In contrast, the effect of rapamycin did not depend on SHP-1 or Akt but on GSK3β, which, as a downstream target of p70 S6K (47), is activated by rapamycin (48).

Inhibition of the PI3K pathway upstreams could facilitate tumor cells to respond to rapamycin by inhibiting mitogenic and survival signaling and cell cycle progression. In previous studies, addition of small-molecule inhibitors against PI3K (12) or insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (7) abolished the rapalog-induced Akt phosphorylation and improved its efficacy. In the present study, we chose to target the PI3K pathway with a biological acting on a G protein–coupled receptor. Sst2 is present on neuroendocrine tumors, and targeting this receptor with somatostatin analogs, such as octreotide, constitutes a first-line pharmacologic treatment for these tumors (16). Using a Sst2 agonist to target the PI3K pathway and improve the antitumor action of rapamycin could ensure a tumor-specific action. While the present study was ongoing, the combination of octreotide long-acting repeatable and the rapalog RAD001 (everolimus) went in phase II clinical trials for the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors and was shown to be well tolerated with promising antitumor activity (49). Our observation that octreotide can sensitize tumor cells to lower concentrations of rapamycin indicates that a beneficial effect can be expected after treatment with lower doses of the drug, which is important in case of adverse side effects. Clinical trials are needed to address the efficacy of the combined treatment in patients with NFPA and other neuroendocrine tumors. Interestingly, two recent studies in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cell lines failed to show improvement of the antiproliferative action of rapamycin after addition of octreotide (50, 51). In our study, the same outcome was observed in the GH3 pituitary tumor cells and was attributed to the lack of p27/Kip1 in these cells (34). Intrinsic differences in each individual tumor are suspected to be responsible for these discrepancies, and future studies are essential to identify factors that may contribute to resistance to the beneficial effects of the combined treatment.

Summarizing, in the present study, we showed that octreotide blocks one of the mechanisms that are suspected to be responsible for rapamycin resistance in a mechanism involving SHP-1, decreased IRS-1 tyrosine, and increased IRS-1 serine phosphorylation. These events lead to suppressed pAkt-Ser473 levels and increased p27/Kip1, which blocks CDK2 activity and eventually cell cycle progression. The herein described mechanistic background indicates that adding somatostatin analogues to rapamycin analogue treatment could efficiently limit growth not only in NFPA but also in other somatostatin receptor–expressing tumor types for which treatment with mTOR inhibitors is indicated.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

G.K. Stalla: commercial research grant, Novartis Pharma GmbH. M. Theodoropoulou: independent consultant, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. The other authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Klaus Molle (Biozentrum, Basel, Switzerland) for providing the Myr-Akt plasmid.

Grant Support: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant TH 901/1-3 (M. Theodoropoulou) and Novartis Pharma GmbH (Nürnberg, Germany) research grant (G.K. Stalla).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received August 8, 2009.
  • Revision received October 23, 2009.
  • Accepted November 5, 2009.
  • ©2010 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Leslie NR,
    2. Biondi RM,
    3. Alessi DR
    . Phosphoinositide-regulated kinases and phosphoinositide phosphatases. Chem Rev 2001;101:2365–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kennedy SG,
    2. Wagner AJ,
    3. Conzen SD,
    4. et al
    . The PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway delivers an anti-apoptotic signal. Genes Dev 1997;11:701–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Liang J,
    2. Slingerland JM
    . Multiple roles of the PI3K/PKB (Akt) pathway in cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2009;2:339–45.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Neshat MS,
    2. Mellinghoff IK,
    3. Tran C,
    4. et al
    . Enhanced sensitivity of PTEN-deficient tumors to inhibition of FRAP/mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:10314–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Majumder PK,
    2. Febbo PG,
    3. Bikoff R,
    4. et al
    . mTOR inhibition reverses Akt-dependent prostate intraepithelial neoplasia through regulation of apoptotic and HIF-1-dependent pathways. Nat Med 2004;10:594–601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Huang S,
    2. Bjornsti MA,
    3. Houghton PJ
    . Rapamycins—mechanism of action and cellular resistance. Cancer Biol Ther 2003;2:222–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. O'Reilly KE,
    2. Rojo F,
    3. She QB,
    4. et al
    . mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res 2006;66:1500–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Um SH,
    2. Frigerio F,
    3. Watanabe M,
    4. et al
    . Absence of S6K1 protects against age- and diet-induced obesity while enhancing insulin sensitivity. Nature 2004;431:200–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Haruta T,
    2. Uno T,
    3. Kawahara J,
    4. et al
    . A rapamycin-sensitive pathway down-regulates insulin signaling via phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation of insulin receptor substrate-1. Mol Endocrinol 2000;14:783–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Paz K,
    2. Liu YF,
    3. Shorer H,
    4. et al
    . Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) by protein kinase B positively regulates IRS-1 function. J Biol Chem 1999;274:28816–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Mothe I,
    2. VanObberghen E
    . Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 on multiple serine residues, 612, 632, 662, and 731, modulates insulin action. J Biol Chem 1996;271:11222–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Sun SY,
    2. Rosenberg LM,
    3. Wang XR,
    4. et al
    . Activation of Akt and eIF4E survival pathways by rapamycin-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition. Cancer Res 2005;65:7052–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Shi Y,
    2. Yan H,
    3. Frost P,
    4. Gera J,
    5. Lichtenstein A
    . Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors activate the AKT kinase in multiple myeloma cells by up-regulating the insulin-like growth factor receptor/insulin receptor substrate-1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase cascade. Mol Cancer Ther 2005;4:1533–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Bousquet C,
    2. Guillermet-Guibert J,
    3. Saint-Laurent N,
    4. et al
    . Direct binding of p85 to sst2 somatostatin receptor reveals a novel mechanism for inhibiting PI3K pathway. EMBO J 2006;25:3943–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Theodoropoulou M,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Laupheimer S,
    4. et al
    . Octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, mediates its antiproliferative action in pituitary tumor cells by altering phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and inducing Zac1 expression. Cancer Res 2006;66:1576–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Lamberts SW,
    2. de Herder WW,
    3. Hofland LJ
    . Somatostatin analogs in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002;13:451–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Renner U,
    2. Brockmeier S,
    3. Strasburger CJ,
    4. et al
    . Growth-hormone (GH)-releasing peptide stimulation of GH release from human somatotroph adenoma cells—interaction with GH-releasing hormone, thyrotropin-releasing-hormone, and octreotide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;78:1090–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Florio T,
    2. Barbieri F,
    3. Spaziante R,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy of a dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecule, BIM-23A760, in the control of cell growth from primary cultures of human non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a multi-center study. Endocr Relat Cancer 2008;15:583–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Paez-Pereda M,
    2. Kovalovsky D,
    3. Hopfner U,
    4. et al
    . Retinoic acid prevents experimental Cushing syndrome. J Clin Invest 2001;108:1123–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gorshtein A,
    2. Rubinfeld H,
    3. Kendler E,
    4. et al
    . mTOR inhibitors rapamycin and RAD001 (everolimus) induce antiproliferative effects in GH-secreting pituitary tumor cells in vitro. Endocr Relat Cancer 2009;16:1017–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Pagotto U,
    2. Arzberger T,
    3. Theodoropoulou M,
    4. et al
    . The expression of the antiproliferative gene ZAC is lost or highly reduced in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Cancer Res 2000;60:6794–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Paez-Pereda M,
    2. Giacomini D,
    3. Refojo D,
    4. et al
    . Involvement of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in pituitary prolactinoma pathogenesis through a Smad/estrogen receptor crosstalk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:1034–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Pages P,
    2. Benali N,
    3. Saint-Laurent N,
    4. et al
    . sst2 somatostatin receptor mediates cell cycle arrest and induction of p27(Kip1)—evidence for the role of SHP-1. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15186–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Andjelkovic M,
    2. Alessi DR,
    3. Meier R,
    4. et al
    . Role of translocation in the activation and function of protein kinase B. J Biol Chem 1997;272:31515–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Musat M,
    2. Korbonits M,
    3. Kola B,
    4. et al
    . Enhanced protein kinase B/Akt signalling in pituitary tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005;12:423–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Marx SO,
    2. Jayaraman T,
    3. Go LO,
    4. Marks AR
    . Rapamycin-FKBP inhibits cell-cycle regulators of proliferation in vascular smooth-muscle cells. Circ Res 1995;76:412–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Cheung NW,
    2. Boyages SC
    . Somatostatin-14 and its analog octreotide exert a cytostatic effect on GH(3) rat pituitary-tumor cell-proliferation via a transient G0/G1 cell-cycle block. Endocrinology 1995;136:4174–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Srikant CB
    . Cell-cycle dependent induction of apoptosis by somatostatin analog SMS-201-995 in AtT-20 mouse pituitary cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995;209:400–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Sherr CJ
    . The Pezcoller lecture: cancer cell cycles revisited. Cancer Res 2000;60:3689–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Koff A,
    2. Giordano A,
    3. Desai D,
    4. et al
    . Formation and activation of a cyclin E-Cdk2 complex during the G(1)-phase of the human cell-cycle. Science 1992;257:1689–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Schwarz JK,
    2. Devoto SH,
    3. Smith EJ,
    4. Chellappan SP,
    5. Jakoi L,
    6. Nevins JR
    . Interactions of the P107 and Rb proteins with E2F during the cell-proliferation response. EMBO J 1993;12:1013–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Charland S,
    2. Boucher MJ,
    3. Houde M,
    4. Rivard N
    . Somatostatin inhibits Akt phosphorylation and cell cycle entry, but not p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation in normal and tumoral pancreatic acinar cells. Endocrinology 2001;142:121–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Nourse J,
    2. Firpo E,
    3. Flanagan WM,
    4. et al
    . Interleukin-2-mediated elimination of the p27(Kip1) cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor prevented by rapamycin. Nature 1994;372:570–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Qian X,
    2. Jin L,
    3. Grande JP,
    4. Lloyd RV
    . Transforming growth factor-β and p27 expression in pituitary cells. Endocrinology 1996;137:3051–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Rocchi S,
    2. Tartaredeckert S,
    3. Mothe I,
    4. VanObberghen E
    . Identification by mutation of the tyrosine residues in the insulin-receptor substrate-1 affecting association with the tyrosine phosphatase 2C and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Endocrinology 1995;136:5291–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Copp J,
    2. Manning G,
    3. Hunter T
    . TORC-specific phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR): phospho-Ser(2481) is a marker for intact mTOR signaling complex 2. Cancer Res 2009;69:1821–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Florio T,
    2. Thellung S,
    3. Arena S,
    4. et al
    . Somatostatin and its analog lanreotide inhibit the proliferation of dispersed human non-functioning pituitary adenoma cells in vitro. Eur J Endocrinol 1999;141:396–408.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  35. ↵
    1. Shomali ME,
    2. Katznelson L
    . Medical therapy of gonadotropin-producing and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2002;5:89–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chanson P,
    2. Brochier S
    . Non-functioning pituitary adenomas. J Endocrinol Invest 2005;28:93–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Tichomirowa MA,
    2. Daly AF,
    3. Beckers A
    . Treatment of pituitary tumors: somatostatin. Endocrine 2005;28:93–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Vignot S,
    2. Faivre S,
    3. Aguirre D,
    4. Raymond E
    . mTOR-targeted therapy of cancer with rapamycin derivatives. Ann Oncol 2005;16:525–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Albers MW,
    2. Williams RT,
    3. Brown EJ,
    4. Tanaka A,
    5. Hall FL,
    6. Schreiber SL
    . FKBP-rapamycin inhibits a cyclin-dependent kinase activity and a cyclin D1-Cdk association in early G1 of an osteosarcoma cell line. J Biol Chem 1993;268:22825–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hashemolhosseini S,
    2. Nagamine Y,
    3. Morley SJ,
    4. Desrivieres S,
    5. Mercep L,
    6. Ferrari S
    . Rapamycin inhibition of the G(1) to S transition is mediated by effects on cyclin D1 mRNA and protein stability. J Biol Chem 1998;273:14424–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Grewe M,
    2. Gansauge F,
    3. Schmid RM,
    4. Adler G,
    5. Seufferlein T
    . Regulation of cell growth and cyclin D1 expression by the constitutively active FRAP-p70(s6K) pathway in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 1999;59:3581–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Morice WG,
    2. Brunn GJ,
    3. Wiederrecht G,
    4. Siekierka JJ,
    5. Abraham RT
    . Rapamycin-induced inhibition of p34cdc2 kinase activation is associated with G1/S-phase growth arrest in T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 1993;268:3734–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Morice WG,
    2. Wiederrecht G,
    3. Brunn GJ,
    4. Siekierka JJ,
    5. Abraham RT
    . Rapamycin inhibition of interleukin-2-dependent p33cdk2 and p34cdc2 kinase activation in T-lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 1993;268:22737–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Zhang HH,
    2. Lipovsky AI,
    3. Dibble CC,
    4. Sahin M,
    5. Manning BD
    . S6K1 regulates GSK3 under conditions of mTOR-dependent feedback inhibition of Akt. Mol Cell 2006;24:185–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Dong JJ,
    2. Peng JY,
    3. Zhang HX,
    4. et al
    . Role of glycogen synthase kinase 3β in rapamycin-mediated cell cycle regulation and chemosensitivity. Cancer Res 2005;65:1961–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Yao JC,
    2. Phan AT,
    3. Chang DZ,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy of RAD001 (everolimus) and octreotide LAR in advanced low- to intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:4311–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Moreno A,
    2. Akcakanat A,
    3. Munsell MF,
    4. Soni A,
    5. Yao JC,
    6. Meric-Bemstam F
    . Antitumor activity of rapamycin and octreotide as single agents or in combination in neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer 2008;15:257–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Grozinsky-Glasberg S,
    2. Franchi G,
    3. Teng M,
    4. et al
    . Octreotide and the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) block proliferation and interact with the Akt-mTOR-p70S6K pathway in a neuro-endocrine tumour cell line. Neuroendocrinology 2008;87:168–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 70 (2)
January 2010
Volume 70, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Somatostatin Analogue Octreotide Confers Sensitivity to Rapamycin Treatment on Pituitary Tumor Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Somatostatin Analogue Octreotide Confers Sensitivity to Rapamycin Treatment on Pituitary Tumor Cells
Vesna Cerovac, Jose Monteserin-Garcia, Hadara Rubinfeld, Michael Buchfelder, Marco Losa, Tullio Florio, Marcelo Paez-Pereda, Günter K. Stalla and Marily Theodoropoulou
Cancer Res January 15 2010 (70) (2) 666-674; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2951

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Somatostatin Analogue Octreotide Confers Sensitivity to Rapamycin Treatment on Pituitary Tumor Cells
Vesna Cerovac, Jose Monteserin-Garcia, Hadara Rubinfeld, Michael Buchfelder, Marco Losa, Tullio Florio, Marcelo Paez-Pereda, Günter K. Stalla and Marily Theodoropoulou
Cancer Res January 15 2010 (70) (2) 666-674; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2951
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cathepsin B Is Dispensable for Cathepsin B-Cleavable ADCs
  • RXRA and PPARG in Bladder Cancer
  • Design of Potent Prodrug Nanoassemblies for Cancer Therapy
Show more Therapeutics, Targets, and Chemical Biology

Keywords

  • Octreotide
  • rapamycin
  • IRS-1
  • p27/Kip1
  • pituitary
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement