Advertisement
Therapeutics, Targets, and Chemical Biology

In Vivo Persistence, Tumor Localization, and Antitumor Activity of CAR-Engineered T Cells Is Enhanced by Costimulatory Signaling through CD137 (4-1BB)

De-Gang Song, Qunrui Ye, Carmine Carpenito, Mathilde Poussin, Li-Ping Wang, Chunyan Ji, Mariangela Figini, Carl H. June, George Coukos and Daniel J. Powell Jr.
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0422 Published July 2011

Abstract

Human T cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) specific for folate receptor-α (FRα) have shown robust antitumor activity against epithelial cancers in vitro but not in the clinic because of their inability to persist and home to tumor in vivo. In this study, CARs were constructed containing a FRα-specific scFv (MOv19) coupled to the T-cell receptor CD3ζ chain signaling module alone (MOv19-ζ) or in combination with the CD137 (4-1BB) costimulatory motif in tandem (MOv19-BBζ). Primary human T cells transduced to express conventional MOv19-ζ or costimulated MOv19-BBζ CARs secreted various proinflammatory cytokines, and exerted cytotoxic function when cocultured with FRα+ tumor cells in vitro. However, only transfer of human T cells expressing the costimulated MOv19-BBζ CAR mediated tumor regression in immunodeficient mice bearing large, established FRα+ human cancer. MOv19-BBζ CAR T-cell infusion mediated tumor regression in models of metastatic intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, and lung-involved human ovarian cancer. Importantly, tumor response was associated with the selective survival and tumor localization of human T cells in vivo and was only observed in mice receiving costimulated MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells. T-cell persistence and antitumor activity were primarily antigen-driven; however, antigen-independent CD137 signaling by CAR improved T-cell persistence but not antitumor activity in vivo. Our results show that anti-FRα CAR outfitted with CD137 costimulatory signaling in tandem overcome issues of T-cell persistence and tumor localization that limit the conventional FRα T-cell targeting strategy to provide potent antitumor activity in vivo. Cancer Res; 71(13); 4617–27. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

Immune targeting of tumor antigens that are overexpressed by cancer cells in numerous cancer types with limited expression in normal tissues holds significant promise for widespread clinical application. Folate receptor-α (FRα) is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein that is overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells in a spectrum of epithelial malignancies, including ovarian, breast, renal, colorectal, lung, and other solid cancers but limited in normal tissues (1–8). FRα overexpression is associated with high-grade tumor progression, poor prognosis in ovarian cancer (9), and poor survival in breast cancer (10), and therefore represents an attractive candidate for targeted biological therapy of epithelial-derived cancers, particularly for epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOC) where approximately 90% of cancers express FRα.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) or “T-bodies” couple the high affinity binding of antibodies with the signaling domains of the T-cell receptor (TCR) CD3ζ chain for specified triggering of T-cell activation similar to the endogenous TCR (11). Despite promising results in neuroblastoma (12, 13) and lymphoma (14, 15), transfer of T cells genetically redirected with CAR to FRα in a phase I clinical trial for the treatment of metastatic ovarian cancer did not induce tumor regression due to the poor persistence of the gene-modified T cells in vivo, a lack of T-cell localization to tumor, and the induction of an undefined T-cell inhibitory factor in the serum of several patients (16). Persistence of tumor antigen–specific T cells after adoptive transfer correlates with tumor regression in patients with advanced metastatic cancer (17), where transferred T cells can localize to regressing lesions (18). Transferred T cells persisting in the blood of responding patients express high levels of costimulatory receptors (19, 20) and response to therapy is associated with the transfer of high numbers of T cells expressing costimulatory receptors (21), suggesting that provision of costimulatory signals is necessary to facilitate improved T-cell survival and antitumor response in vivo. The addition of costimulatory domains, including the intracellular domain of CD28, and TNF receptor family members, CD134 (OX-40) and CD137 (4-1BB) into CARs can significantly augment the ability of these receptors to stimulate cytokine secretion and enhance antitumor efficacy in preclinical animal models of solid tumors and leukemia that lack cognate costimulatory ligands (13, 22–24), and thus rationalizes the incorporation of costimulatory modules in the creation of anti-FRα CAR therapy.

Here, we addressed the issue of limited FRα-specific T-cell persistence and tumor activity in vivo through the introduction of the CD137 costimulatory signaling domain into a FRα-specific CAR and studied the role of CD137 signaling in FRα-directed CAR T-cell therapy of human cancer. Compared with “first-generation” CAR that provide CD3ζ signaling to T cells but lack cis costimulatory signaling capacity, T cells expressing FRα-specific CAR with a CD137 signaling domain in tandem showed minimally improved antitumor activity in vitro, but markedly superior tumor regression capacity in established human ovarian cancer xenograft models, which was associated with enhanced T-cell persistence and tumor localization in vivo. Tumor regression and T-cell persistence were both attainable by various routes of T-cell infusion, and intravenous (i.v.) cell infusion mediates the regression of human cancer in xenograft models of advanced intraperitoneal (i.p.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and lung-involved metastatic disease. T-cell persistence and tumor activity in vivo were largely antigen-driven; however, provision of CD137 signaling in the absence of specific antigen recognition by CAR could improve T-cell persistence but not antitumor activity in vivo. Incorporation of the CD137 signaling domain in FRα-specific CARs thus overcomes the limitation of past CAR approaches by improving the persistence of transferred T cells in vivo, and bolstering their accumulation in tumor and antitumor potency.

Materials and Methods

Anti-FRα chimeric immune receptor construction

The MOv19 scFv-based (2, 25, 26) chimeric immune receptor was constructed by using pCLPS lentiviral vector backbone constructs previously described (22). CAR construction and lentivirus production are detailed in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Human T cells

Primary human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which were purchased from the Human Immunology Core at University of Pennsylvania, were isolated from healthy volunteer donors following leukapheresis by negative selection. All specimens were collected under a protocol approved by a University Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained from each donor. T cells were cultured in complete media (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin sulfate, 10 mmol/L HEPES), and stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 monoclonal antibodies (mAb)-coated beads (Invitrogen) as described (27). Twelve to twenty-four hours after activation, T cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors at multiplicity of infection of approximately 5 to 10. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells used for in vivo experiments were mixed at 1:1 ratio, activated, and transduced. Human recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2; Novartis) was added every other day to a 50 IU/mL final concentration and a cell density of 0.5 × 106 to 1 × 106 cells/mL was maintained. Once T cells seemed to rest down, as determined by both decreased growth kinetics and cell sizing by using the Multisizer 3 Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter), engineered T-cell cultures were adjusted to equalize the frequency of transgene expressing cells prior to functional assays.

Functional assays

Cytokine release assays were carried out by an IFN-γ ELISA Kit (Biolegend) or by Cytometric Bead Array, according to manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences) as described in Supplementary Materials and Methods. Cell-based bioluminescence and 51Cr release assays of cytolysis were carried out as previously described (28, 29).

Xenograft model of ovarian cancer

Mouse studies were carried out as previously described (22, 30) with modifications detailed in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Immunohistochemistry

Fresh frozen tumor samples were sectioned for immunohistochemical analysis as described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by 2-way repeated measures ANOVA for the tumor burden (tumor volume, photon counts). Student's t test was used to evaluate differences in absolute number of transferred T cells, cytokine secretion, and specific cytolysis. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were compared by using the log-rank test. GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software) was used for the statistical calculations. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

CAR construction

The mouse anti-human FRα-specific scFv MOv19 was selected on the basis of its high binding affinity for FRα (108–109 M−1; refs. 2, 25, 26). FRα CAR constructs were comprised of the MOv19 scFv linked to a CD8α hinge and transmembrane region, followed by a CD3ζ signaling moiety alone (MOv19-ζ) or in tandem with the CD137 intracellular signaling motif (MOv19-BBζ; Fig. 1A). A signaling deficient FRα-specific CAR containing a truncated CD3ζ intracellular domain (MOv19-Δζ) was designed to assess the contribution of CD3ζ signaling. An anti-CD19 CAR containing CD3ζ and CD137 signaling motifs in tandem (anti–CD19-BBζ) was used as an antigen specificity control (30). CAR constructs were subcloned into the pCLPS lentiviral vector where transgene expression is driven off the cytomegalovirus promoter. Using gene transfer technology established for clinical application, lentiviral vectors efficiently transduced primary human T cells to express the anti-FRα CAR (Fig. 1B). T-cell transduction efficiency, as assessed by flow cytometry, was equilibrated for all constructs at approximately 50% in all assays.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Generation and specific immune recognition by FRα CAR–transduced human T cells in vitro. A, schematic representation of MOv19-based CAR constructs containing the CD3ζ cytosolic domain alone (MOv19-ζ) or in combination with CD137 costimulatory module (MOv19-BBζ). FRα-specific CAR with a truncated CD3ζ domain (MOv19-Δζ) and anti–CD19-BBζ CAR are shown. VL, variable L chain; L, linker; VH, variable H chain; TM, transmembrane region. B, MOv19 CAR expression (solid black line) on human CD3-gated cells after transduction with lentivirus compared with parallel untransduced T cells (filled gray histograms). Percent transduction is indicated. C, surface FRα expression (solid black line) by various human ovarian cancer cell lines by flow cytometry; isotype antibody control (filled gray histograms). D, antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion by MOv19-ζ and MOv19-BBζ CAR-transduced T cells but not MOv19-Δζ anti–CD19-BBζ T cells, following overnight incubation with FRα+ cancer cell lines. Mean IFN-γ concentration ± SEM (pg/mL) from triplicate cultures is shown. E, antigen-specific killing of FRα+ tumor cells by FRα CAR+ CD8+ T cells in 18-hour bioluminescence assay at the indicated E/T ratio. Untransduced T cells (UNT) or gfp-transduced human CD8+ T cells served as controls.

Primary human FRα CAR T cells exert antigen-specific function in vitro

Because ovarian cancer frequently express FRα (2), a panel of established human ovarian cancer cell lines that express surface FRα at varying levels (SKOV3, A1847, and OVCAR3) was selected for assays (Fig. 1C). Two ovarian cancer lines, C30 and PEO-1, were negative for FRα. Transduced T cells expressing MOv19-BBζ or MOv19-ζ CARs recognized FRα+ tumor lines and secreted high levels of IFN-γ, but not when stimulated with FRα− lines (Fig. 1D). FRα-specific CAR T cells also secreted high levels of IL-2 and TNF-α when stimulated with FRα+ cancer cells and low but detectable levels of IL-4 and IL-10 (Supplementary Fig. S1). MOv19 CARs functioned in both primary human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In all cases, MOv19-BBζ T cells secreted more IFN-γ than MOv19-ζ T cells after specific stimulation. CD19-BBζ CAR did not produce IFN-γ, except when coincubated with K562 cells engineered to express surface CD19 antigen, and human T cells expressing MOv19-Δζ CAR did not secrete cytokine when stimulated with FRα+ cancer cells (Fig. 1D), showing that antigen specificity and CD3ζ signaling are required for CAR activity in T cells.

To interrogate antigen-specific cytolytic potential, anti-FRα CAR CD8+ T cells were cocultured with FRα− AE17 (31), a mouse malignant mesothelioma cell line, or AE17.FRα (an AE17 line derivative transduced to express high surface levels of human FRα). In standard 4-hour chromium release and 24-hour bioluminescence assays, FRα-specific CAR T cells (MOv19-ζ and MOv19-BBζ) specifically lysed AE17.FRα cells but not the parental AE17 line (Supplementary Fig. S2). T cells expressing anti–CD19-BBζ, MOv19-Δζ, or green fluorescent protein (gfp) did not lyse AE17.FRα or AE17 cells. Consistent with cytokine production results, primary human CD8+ T cells expressing MOv19-ζ or MOv19-BBζ CAR directly and efficiently lysed FRα+ human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3 and A1847, but not FRα− lines C30 or 624mel, a melanoma cell line (Fig. 1E). MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells exhibited increased cytotoxicity compared with MOv19-ζ CAR T cells, but not at a level of statistical significance. Thus, human T cells transduced with FRα-specific CAR specifically recognize FRα+ human and mouse cancer cells and exert MHC-unrestricted cytotoxic activity in vitro.

Antitumor activity of primary human FRα CAR T cells in vivo

CAR functional activity in vitro cannot adequately predict the antitumor potential of transduced human T cells in vivo. The antitumor efficacy of FRα CAR constructs were evaluated in a xenograft model of large, established cancer. Immunodeficient NOD/SCID/IL-2Rγcnull (NSG) mice were inoculated s.c. with firefly luciferase (fLuc)-transfected FRα+ SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cells on the flank and received intratumoral (i.t.) injections of CAR+ T cells on days 40 and 45 post-tumor inoculation (p.i.), when tumors were 250 mm3 or more in size. Tumors in mice receiving saline, MOv19-Δζ CAR T cells, or gfp T cells progressed beyond the time of T cell transfer as measured by caliper-based sizing and bioluminescence imaging (BLI; Fig. 2A and B). Tumor growth was modestly delayed in mice receiving MOv19-ζ T cells (P = 0.027), compared with all 3 control groups at the latest evaluated time point (38 days after first T-cell dose). In contrast, mice receiving i.t. injection of MOv19-BBζ T cells experienced rapid tumor regression, which was significantly better than MOv19-ζ T cells (P < 0.001), indicating that incorporation of CD137 signals enhances overall antitumor activity in vivo. Tumor-bearing mice treated with MOv19-BBζ–transduced T cells delivered via i.v., i.p. injection, or i.t. routes experienced tumor regression (Fig. 2C). Following i.v. or i.p. infusion of MOv19-BBζ T cells, antitumor activity was again observed, though delayed in regression by approximately 7 days relative to i.t. delivery, indicating that although local injection is optimal, systemically infused CAR T cells can marginalize upon adoptive transfer to mediate potent antitumor effects in vivo.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Human MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells eradicate large preestablished tumors in vivo: effect of CD137 costimulatory signaling domains and route of administration. A, NSG mice bearing established s.c. tumor were treated with intratumoral injections of 8 × 106 CAR+ T cells on days 0 and 5 and imaged every 2 weeks. Tumor growth was assessed by caliper measurement [V = 1/2(length × width2)]. B, SKOV3 fLuc+ bioluminescence signal was decreased in MOv19-BBζ CAR treated mice compared with the MOv19-ζ and the control treatment groups 2 weeks and 4 weeks after last T-cell dose. C, SKOV3 fLuc-bearing NSG mice were treated with 8 × 106 MOv19-BBζ T cells via i.t., i.p., or i.v. routes. Tumor growth was assessed by caliper measurement. D, CD137 signaling enhances the survival of human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vivo on day 73 (4 weeks following last T-cell dose) in the peripheral blood. CD4 and CD8 T cells were quantitated from blood by using the TruCount method. Mean cell concentration (cells/μL) ± SD for all evaluable mice in each treatment group is shown.

Persistence of primary human FRα CAR T cells in vivo is increased by 4-1BB signals

The persistence of transferred tumor-reactive T cells following adoptive T-cell therapy is highly correlated with tumor regression (17). In the experiments described earlier, peripheral blood was collected from tumor-bearing mice 3 weeks after the last T-cell dose and quantified for persistent human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2D). CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts were highest in mice receiving MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells, whether delivered by i.t., i.p., or i.v. routes of administration, compared with gfp, MOv19-Δζ, and MOv19-ζ treatment groups. Notably, human T-cell counts in mice receiving MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells by i.v. injection was significantly higher than those in the parallel MOv19-ζ CAR group (P < 0.01), indicating a role for CD137 in T-cell survival in vivo. There was no significant difference in level of T-cell persistence among mice receiving MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells by i.v., i.t., or i.p. injection (P = 0.2), despite a trend toward less cells in the i.v. injection group. Total T-cell counts in the MOv19-ζ treatment group was statistically similar to other control groups including mice receiving saline in the absence of human T-cell injection (Supplementary Fig. S3; P > 0.05), suggesting that antigen specificity alone is not sufficient for T-cell maintenance in vivo. This was primarily attributed to poor CD4+ T-cell persistence because circulating MOv19-ζ CAR CD8+ T cells persisted at greater numbers than MOv19-Δζ CAR (P = 0.026) or gfp (P = 0.013) cells. Four weeks after last MOv19-BBζ CAR T-cell dose, the absolute number of human T cells persisting in the blood was inversely correlated with tumor burden of each group (Supplementary Fig. S3; r = −0.78). Tumor BLI results were consistent with the size of resected residual tumors (Supplementary Fig. S4). Mechanistically, enhanced persistence of MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells, compared with MOv19-ζ, seemed to be attributed in part to an increased upregulation of antiapoptotic Bcl-XL protein expression after antigen stimulation (Supplementary Fig. S3). Thus, tumor regression was associated with the stable persistence of engineered human T cells in vivo and supported by provision of CD137 costimulation.

Tumor regression and T-cell persistence are antigen-driven in vivo

To determine whether MOv19-BBζ CAR antitumor activity is antigen-specific, a comparative study was conducted with an anti-CD19–specific CAR also containing the CD137 signaling domain (30). NSG mice with established s.c. SKOV3 fLuc+ tumor receiving 2 i.t. T-cell injections experienced rapid tumor regression, whereas tumor grew progressively in mice treated with T cells expressing gfp or CD19-BBζ CAR (Fig. 3A), excluding alloreactivity as a mechanism of tumor regression. Mice receiving MOv19-BBζ T cells had significantly higher human CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts than mice in anti-CD19 CAR or gfp groups (Fig 3B; P = 0.009), indicating that tumor antigen recognition drives the survival of the adoptively transferred T cells in vivo. Interestingly, T-cell persistence was reproducibly higher in mice receiving anti–CD19-BBζ CAR T cells than gfp T cells (P = 0.012), suggesting that persistence of CAR T cells can be promoted in part through a CD137-driven process that does not require scFv engagement with antigen. Nevertheless, there was no statistical difference in tumor control between anti–CD19-BBζ CAR and gfp groups (P = 0.065) even at the latest time point studied (day 73), showing that persistence in the absence of antigen specificity is insufficient to mediate tumor response. In this line, CAR expressing T-cell frequency in the blood of tumor-bearing mice administered MOv19-BBζ T cells was higher than that observed in mice receiving CD19-BBζ CAR T cells, though not at statistical significance (Fig. 3C; P = 0.08). However, coupled with increased T-cell counts, the total number of circulating CAR+ T cells persisting 1 month after infusion were significantly higher in mice receiving MOv19-BBζ T cells (76 ± 13 cells/μL; P = 0.013); mice in CD19-BBζ CAR and gfp groups had little to no detectable persistence of CAR+ T cells with counts of 12 ± 4 cells/μL and 0 ± 0 cells/μl, respectively (Fig. 3D). Consistent with the increased persistence of MOv19-BBζ T cells in the blood of treated animals, immunohistochemical analysis revealed robust accumulation of human CD3+ T cells in regressing SKOV3 lesions 6 weeks after i.v. T-cell administration (Fig. 4). Few CD3+ T cells were detected in tumors resected at the same time from mice that received anti–CD19-BBζ CAR or gfp-transduced T cells.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Tumor eradication by CAR T cells is antigen-specific. A, NSG mice with s.c. SKOV3 fLuc+ tumor were treated with 8 × 106 T cells (40% transduction efficiency) expressing MOv19-BBζ, anti–CD19-BBζ, or gfp via i.t. infusion on days 0 and 5 and measured for tumor volume by calipers every 2 to 3 days. B, peripheral blood was collected 3 weeks following last T-cell infusion and quantified for the absolute number of human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells/μl of blood. Mean cell count ± SD is shown. C, FRα- and CD19-specific CAR expression on human CD3+ T cells from peripheral blood of treated mice measured by flow cytometry by using goat anti-mouse IgG F(ab′)2. Mean CAR+ expression frequency ± SD per group is shown. D, absolute CAR+ T-cell count was calculated as number of human CD3+ T cells/μL of blood times percent CAR+. Mean count ± SD was determined.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

CAR T-cell localization to tumor in vivo is antigen-specific. NSG mice with s.c. SKOV3 fLuc+ tumors were treated with i.v. injections of 8 × 106 T cells expressing MOv19-BBζ (top), anti–CD19-BBζ (middle), or gfp (bottom) on days 0 and 5. SKOV3 tumors grown for approximately 40 additional days were collected from euthanized mice and stained for human CD3 expression (brown). Representative sections are shown at ×100 magnifications.

Tumor regression in the metastatic disease setting

Advanced ovarian cancer is a disease usually confined to the peritoneal cavity with occasional metastatic spread to the pleural compartment. A xenogeneic model of advanced i.p. metastatic cancer was established to evaluate the functional activity of FRα-specific T cells against tumor localized to a more physiologically relevant compartment. NSG mice that were inoculated i.p. with SKOV3 fLuc+ cells efficiently developed peritoneal carcinomatosis which was readily evident 30 days p.i., when MOv19-BBζ or control anti–CD19-BBζ CAR T-cell therapy was administered (Fig. 5A). Within 3 weeks of T-cell transfer, all mice that received control anti–CD19-BBζ CAR T cells developed distended abdomens, marked bloody ascites of approximately 5 to 8 mL volume and multiple nodular peritoneal tumors, and had to be euthanized due to tumor-associated, abdominal distention (Fig. 5B and C). By comparison, mice treated with MOv19-BBζ CAR T cells did not develop distended abdomens or ascites, and exhibited a profound enhancement in tumor-related survival (P = 0.0002) with no cases of tumor-related mortality in the MOv19-BBζ CAR group (Fig. 5C). At the time of euthanasia of mice treated with MOv19-BBζ, tumor burden was minimal to none, but mice required euthanizing due to signs of distress compatible with GVHD that develops in NSG mice following xenogeneic transfer of activated human lymphocytes (32). Still, median survival times of 52 days after last T-cell infusion by i.v. injection and 68 days by the i.p. route were observed in mice treated with MOv19-BBζ CAR, compared with 9 and 12 days in the anti–CD19-BBζ CAR T-cell groups, respectively (MOv19-BBζ i.p. vs. anti–CD19-BBζ i.p., P = 0.0023; MOv19-BBζ i.v. vs. anti–CD19-BBζ i.v., P = 0.0025; Fig. 5D). Two months after treatment with MOv19-BBζ CAR cells via i.p. or i.v. routes, 60% (3 of 5) and 40% (2 of 5) of tumor-inoculated mice remained alive, respectively.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Mov19-BBζ T cells inhibit tumor growth and ascites formation in SKOV3 murine model of peritoneal carcinomatosis. A, NSG mice received i.p. injection of 5 × 106 SKOV3 fLuc+ tumor cells and were randomized into 4 groups before beginning therapy with 9 × 106 T cells expressing MOv19-BBζ or anti–CD19-BBζ via i.p. or i.v. infusion on day 30 and 35 after tumor inoculation. B, representative NSG mice treated with MOv19-BBζ T cells (left) via i.v. (top) or i.p (bottom) infusion. Mice treated with anti–CD19-BBζ T cells (right) developed ascites as evidenced by a distended abdomen (middle). Postmortem visualization of the peritoneum shows nodular tumor masses (arrows; far right). C, Kaplan-Meier tumor-related survival curve of tumor-bearing NSG mice treated with either MOv19-BBζ or anti–CD19-BBζ T cells via i.v. or i.p. injection. D, Kaplan-Meier overall survival of tumor-bearing NSG mice.

Occasionally, ovarian cancer patients develop lung metastases and pleural ascites formation requiring thoracentesis or other supportive management procedures during disease progression (33). A model of metastatic ovarian cancer of lung was generated by inoculation of NSG mice with SKOV3 fLuc+ cells via tail-vein injection resulting in progressive lung metastases in 100% of mice 3 days p.i. (Fig. 6). Two i.v. injections of MOv19-BBζ T cells resulted in rapid regression of lung metastasis in all treated animals 14 days p.i. and 80% (4 of 5) of mice had no evidence of recurrence after 1 month. By contrast, disease progression occurred in all mice receiving anti–CD19-BBζ T cells.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Adoptive transfer of FRα-specific T cells induces regression of ovarian cancer lung metastasis. A, NSG mice with 3 day established SKOV3 fLuc+ tumor in the lungs received tail-vein injections of 6 × 106 T cells expressing either MOv19-BBζ or anti–CD19-BBζ on day 3 and day 8 and were monitored by BLI. B, photon emission from fLuc+ tumor cells was quantified and the mean ± SD bioluminescence signal determined.

Discussion

CARs combine the high affinity and specificity of antigen-specific antibody, which binds cell surface determinants in a non–MHC-restricted manner, with the potent effector functions of T lymphocytes (11). Genetically retargeting of primary human lymphocytes with CARs recognizing tumor-associated antigens offers a robust and rapid avenue toward the generation of tumor-reactive T cells for therapy. To date, CAR-based therapy has shown promising but often limited clinical activity, despite the reproducible demonstration of strong effector activity in vitro (12–16). Effective adoptive T-cell therapy not only requires antitumor activity, but also in vivo expansion and persistence of the infused tumor-reactive T cells (17). In our study, we have addressed the central issue of limited CAR T-cell persistence and tumor activity in vivo (16) through the introduction of the CD137 (4-1BB) costimulatory signaling domain into a Mov19 scFv-based CAR.

CD137 is a TNF receptor family member that plays an important role in T-cell proliferation and survival, particularly for T cells within the memory T-cell pool (34–36). We selected CD137 on the basis of its demonstrated capacity to support of CD8 T-cell expansion (36), and upregulate important antiapoptotic protein Bcl-XL expression (37), and results showing that adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T cells costimulated ex vivo with 4-1BBL supports persistence and antitumor activity in vivo (38). This work builds upon our previous study which showed high costimulatory receptor expression on tumor antigen–specific T cells persisting in the circulation in patients responding to adoptive immunotherapy (19), and correlations between costimulatory receptor expression on transferred T cells and tumor regression (20;21). Like the “first-generation” Mov19-ζ CAR expressing CD3ζ signaling alone, T cells engineered to express a “second-generation” Mov19-BBζ CAR containing CD3ζ signaling and a CD137 signaling domain in tandem preferentially secrete high levels of Th1 cytokines including IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 upon tumor encounter and exert strong antitumor activity in vitro. Here, IFN-γ cytokine production levels were generally associated with the level of FRα expressed by tumor cell targets, and cytolysis of tumor cells by Mov19-ζ CAR and Mov19-BBζ CAR T cells was efficient even at a 3:1 effector to target cell (E/T) ratio in vitro. In all in vitro antitumor assays, engineered T cells expressing Mov19-BBζ CAR outperformed Mov19-ζ CAR T cells, albeit not always to the level of statistical significance. Interestingly, the single exception was in the level of Th2 cytokine secretion induced by tumor stimulation, where FRα engagement by Mov19-ζ CAR T cells induced greater IL-4 and IL-10 production, suggesting that combined CD3ζ and CD137 signaling enforces a Th1 skewed response.

The dichotomy between first- and second-generation CAR vectors was most evident in in vivo studies where CD137 bearing Mov19-BBζ CAR T cells facilitated superior regression of large vascularized tumors in an established human ovarian cancer xenograft model, whereas tumor progression was almost unabated with Mov19-ζ CAR T cells. Transfer of 16 × 106 total Mov19-BBζ CAR T cells eliminated an estimated 2.5 × 108 tumor cells (assuming that a 250 mm3 tumor mass contains approximately 2.5 × 108 cells); in effect, an approximately 1:15 E/T ratio. Consistent with previous clinical observations (18, 39), tumor response was associated with enhanced T-cell persistence and tumor localization of Mov19-BBζ CAR T cells in vivo, which seemed to be attributed in part to upregulated expression of Bcl-XL following stimulation with tumor. Tumor regression was antigen-specific, as transfer of anti–CD19-BBζ T cells had no impact on tumor progression. Tumor regression and T-cell persistence were attainable via systemic or local T-cell delivery, showing the capacity of transferred T cells to circulate, home to tumor and perform antitumor functions. Although i.v. injections are favorable in clinical application due to the ease of administration and effective in our model, our data suggest that local administration of T cells may provide optimal therapeutic effect, which may be in part due to increased T-cell trafficking to tumor and provision of favorable E/T ratios. However, such delivery may not be applicable for tumors with multiple gross metastatic sites or micrometastases.

Although Mov19-BBζ and anti–CD19-BBζ T cells could be detected in the peripheral blood 3 weeks after T-cell infusion, the accumulation of Mov19-BBζ, but not anti–CD19-BBζ T cells, in FRα+ tumor lesions suggests that antigen-selective retention of CAR bearing T cells in tumor occurs and may be requisite in part for tumor regression (40). In a previous study, transferred TCR transgenic T cells migrated indiscriminately early after adoptive transfer but experienced antigen-dependent activation exclusively in antigen-positive tumor resulting in tumor destruction (41). Transfer of chemokine receptor expressing CAR T cells can enforce preferential migration to tumor sites to boost antitumor activity in vivo (42). Our results support the hypothesis that T-cell persistence, localization, and tumor activity in vivo are largely antigen-dependent, likely linked, processes. Notably, the use of anti–CD19-BBζ T cells as specificity control in our assays, however, shows that provision of CD137 signaling by CAR permitted improved T-cell persistence but not antitumor activity in vivo through a mechanism that is independent of scFv engagement with antigen, suggestive of low-level constitutive activity by the CD137 module, consistent with previous data (30). In this scenario, it remains possible that persistence of nonspecific CD137-costimulated human T cells was driven by low-level TCR recognition of xenoantigens in mice combined with constitutive CD137 signaling by CAR, as shown by the occurrence of graft-versus-host manifestations, which is an inherent limitation of the xenogeneic NSG mouse model used.

T-cell–based targeting of FRα has been tested in patients with advanced ovarian cancer with promising results. In an earlier clinical study, retargeted T cells were generated for therapy by loading preactivated T cells with a bispecific mouse mAb OC/TR, directed to the CD3 molecule on T lymphocytes and to FRα on EOC cells (43). Administration of FRα-redirected T cells to women with minimal residual ovarian cancer resulted in antitumor responses in 27% of patients with mild to moderate immunotherapy-related toxicities; however, therapy was limited by the inability to generate stable anti-FRα–specific T-cell memory and the induction of human anti-mouse antibodies against the bispecific mAb in approximately 90% of treated patients (44). In a phase I study of anti-FRα CAR therapy for cancer, Kershaw and colleagues (16) transferred T cells that were retargeted to FRα by a first-generation MOv18 scFv-based CAR to immunocompetent patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The parental MOv18 antibody has a similar affinity for FRα (108 −109 M−1) as MOv19 used in our CAR construct (2, 26) though the relative affinities of their scFv products in CARs is not known. MOv18 and MOv19 also bind non–cross-reactive epitopes (2), which may influence their relative ability to access surface antigen. Therapy using MOv18-ζ CAR was safe and feasible; however, no patient experienced a tumor response which was attributed to a lack of transferred T-cells persistence after infusion, poor tumor localization, and the development of a serum inhibitory factor that reduced CAR T-cell activity in in vivo study (16). Our studies, combined with recent clinical strategies, address these issues. Similar to the study of Kershaw and colleagues (16), first-generation MOv19-ζ CAR, which redirected T-cell cytotoxicity in vitro, only delayed tumor progression in vivo and CARs did not persist long-term in vivo. We show that tumor response and T-cell persistence can be evoked by provision of CD137 costimulatory signals to anti-FRα CAR T cells, which is facilitated principally by engagement of their CAR with tumor antigen. Moreover, transfer of MOv19-BBζ T cells leads to increased accumulation of human T cells in regressing ovarian cancer lesions. Although the mouse anti-human MOv19 scFv used in the construction of the MOv19-BBζ CAR is likely to elicit anti-mouse humoral responses in immunocompetent recipients, as seen in past CAR studies and trials using MOv18 scFv (16, 44, 45), nonmyeloablative immunosuppressive preconditioning can disable host endogenous immunity to promote the in vivo persistence of T cells expressing CARs and TCRs of mouse origin, facilitating tumor regression (14, 46, 47). The use of immunodeficient NSG mice models T-cell transfer in the setting of host lymphodepletion, albeit in the absence of human derivatives and endogenous immune reconstitution. Still, the use of fully human anti-FRα scFv candidates for the next generation of CAR-redirected therapy is worthy of investigation (26, 48). Our preclinical results support the notion that incorporation of the CD137 signaling domain in FRα-specific CARs overcomes the limitations of past CAR approaches by improving the persistence of transferred T cells in vivo, thereby increasing their retention in tumor and bolstering antitumor potency. Careful considerations must be made when targeting of self/tumor antigens with CARs or exogenous TCRs, which hold the potential for mediating serious adverse events (47, 49); however, FRα, which is present on normal tissues, is localized primarily to the apical surfaces of polarized epithelia, where it may be inaccessible to parenterally administered folate conjugates and redirected T cells (50). Our results provide the rationale for the clinical investigation of MOv19-BBζ CAR T-cell therapy in combination with lymphodepleting preconditioning regimens for the treatment of a wide spectrum of FRα-expressing epithelial malignancies.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund, the Sandy Rollman Ovarian Cancer Foundation, the Joint Fox Chase Cancer Center, and University of Pennsylvania Ovarian Cancer SPORE (P50 CA083638).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Silvana Canevari, Gwenn Danet-Desnoyers, and Michael C. Milone for their suggestions and helpful discussions.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received February 8, 2011.
  • Revision received April 7, 2011.
  • Accepted April 16, 2011.

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    1. Coney LR,
    2. Tomassetti A,
    3. Carayannopoulos L,
    4. Frasca V,
    5. Kamen BA,
    6. Colnaghi MI,
    7. et al.
    Cloning of a tumor-associated antigen: MOv18 and MOv19 antibodies recognize a folate-binding protein. Cancer Res 1991;51:6125–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Miotti S,
    2. Canevari S,
    3. Menard S,
    4. Mezzanzanica D,
    5. Porro G,
    6. Pupa SM,
    7. et al.
    Characterization of human ovarian carcinoma-associated antigens defined by novel monoclonal antibodies with tumor-restricted specificity. Int J Cancer 1987;39:297–303.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ross JF,
    2. Chaudhuri PK,
    3. Ratnam M
    . Differential regulation of folate receptor isoforms in normal and malignant tissues in vivo and in established cell lines.Physiologic and clinical implications. Cancer 1994;73:2432–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Weitman SD,
    2. Lark RH,
    3. Coney LR,
    4. Fort DW,
    5. Frasca V,
    6. Zurawski VR Jr.,
    7. et al.
    Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues. Cancer Res 1992;52:3396–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yuan Y,
    2. Nymoen DA,
    3. Dong HP,
    4. Bjorang O,
    5. Shih I,
    6. Low PS,
    7. et al.
    Expression of the folate receptor genes FOLR1 and FOLR3 differentiates ovarian carcinoma from breast carcinoma and malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1453–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Campbell IG,
    2. Jones TA,
    3. Foulkes WD,
    4. Trowsdale J
    . Folate-binding protein is a marker for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 1991;51:5329–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kalli KR,
    2. Oberg AL,
    3. Keeney GL,
    4. Christianson TJ,
    5. Low PS,
    6. Knutson KL,
    7. et al.
    Folate receptor alpha as a tumor target in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108:619–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Markert S,
    2. Lassmann S,
    3. Gabriel B,
    4. Klar M,
    5. Werner M,
    6. Gitsch G,
    7. et al.
    Alpha-folate receptor expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma and non-neoplastic ovarian tissue. Anticancer Res 2008;28:3567–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Toffoli G,
    2. Cernigoi C,
    3. Russo A,
    4. Gallo A,
    5. Bagnoli M,
    6. Boiocchi M
    . Overexpression of folate binding protein in ovarian cancers. Int J Cancer 1997;74:193–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hartmann LC,
    2. Keeney GL,
    3. Lingle WL,
    4. Christianson TJ,
    5. Varghese B,
    6. Hillman D,
    7. et al.
    Folate receptor overexpression is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2007;121:938–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gross G,
    2. Waks T,
    3. Eshhar Z
    . Expression of immunoglobulin-T-cell receptor chimeric molecules as functional receptors with antibody-type specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:10024–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Park JR,
    2. Digiusto DL,
    3. Slovak M,
    4. Wright C,
    5. Naranjo A,
    6. Wagner J,
    7. et al.
    Adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor re-directed cytolytic T lymphocyte clones in patients with neuroblastoma. Mol Ther 2007;15:825–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pule MA,
    2. Straathof KC,
    3. Dotti G,
    4. Heslop HE,
    5. Rooney CM,
    6. Brenner MK
    . A chimeric T cell antigen receptor that augments cytokine release and supports clonal expansion of primary human T cells. Mol Ther 2005;12:933–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kochenderfer JN,
    2. Wilson WH,
    3. Janik JE,
    4. Dudley ME,
    5. Stetler-Stevenson M,
    6. Feldman SA,
    7. et al.
    Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19. Blood 2010;116:4099–102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Till BG,
    2. Jensen MC,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Chen EY,
    5. Wood BL,
    6. Greisman HA,
    7. et al.
    Adoptive immunotherapy for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma using genetically modified autologous CD20-specific T cells. Blood 2008;112:2261–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kershaw MH,
    2. Westwood JA,
    3. Parker LL,
    4. Wang G,
    5. Eshhar Z,
    6. Mavroukakis SA,
    7. et al.
    A phase I study on adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified T cells for ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:6106–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Robbins PF,
    2. Dudley ME,
    3. Wunderlich J,
    4. El-Gamil M,
    5. Li YF,
    6. Zhou J,
    7. et al.
    Cutting edge: persistence of transferred lymphocyte clonotypes correlates with cancer regression in patients receiving cell transfer therapy. J Immunol 2004;173:7125–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dudley ME,
    2. Wunderlich JR,
    3. Robbins PF,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Hwu P,
    6. Schwartzentruber DJ,
    7. et al.
    Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 2002;298:850–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Powell DJ Jr.
    , Dudley ME, Robbins PF, Rosenberg SA.Transition of late-stage effector T cells to CD27+ CD28+ tumor-reactive effector memory T cells in humans after adoptive cell transfer therapy. Blood 2005;105:241–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Shen X,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Hodes RJ,
    5. Rosenberg SA,
    6. Robbins PF
    . Telomere length of transferred lymphocytes correlates with in vivo persistence and tumor regression in melanoma patients receiving cell transfer therapy. J Immunol 2005;175:7046–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Huang J,
    2. Kerstann KW,
    3. Ahmadzadeh M,
    4. Li YF,
    5. El-Gamil M,
    6. Rosenberg SA,
    7. et al.
    Modulation by IL-2 of CD70 and CD27 expression on CD8+ T cells: importance for the therapeutic effectiveness of cell transfer immunotherapy. J Immunol 2006;176:7726–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Carpenito C,
    2. Milone MC,
    3. Hassan R,
    4. Simonet JC,
    5. Lakhal M,
    6. Suhoski MM,
    7. et al.
    Control of large, established tumor xenografts with genetically retargeted human T cells containing CD28 and CD137 domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:3360–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Imai C,
    2. Mihara K,
    3. Andreansky M,
    4. Nicholson IC,
    5. Pui CH,
    6. Geiger TL,
    7. et al.
    Chimeric receptors with 4-1BB signaling capacity provoke potent cytotoxicity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2004;18:676–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Moeller M,
    2. Haynes NM,
    3. Trapani JA,
    4. Teng MW,
    5. Jackson JT,
    6. Tanner JE,
    7. et al.
    A functional role for CD28 costimulation in tumor recognition by single-chain receptor-modified T cells. Cancer Gene Ther 2004;11:371–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Melani C,
    2. Figini M,
    3. Nicosia D,
    4. Luison E,
    5. Ramakrishna V,
    6. Casorati G,
    7. et al.
    Targeting of interleukin 2 to human ovarian carcinoma by fusion with a single-chain Fv of antifolate receptor antibody. Cancer Res 1998;58:4146–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Figini M,
    2. Obici L,
    3. Mezzanzanica D,
    4. Griffiths A,
    5. Colnaghi MI,
    6. Winter G,
    7. et al.
    Panning phage antibody libraries on cells: isolation of human Fab fragments against ovarian carcinoma using guided selection. Cancer Res 1998;58:991–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Levine BL,
    2. Bernstein WB,
    3. Connors M,
    4. Craighead N,
    5. Lindsten T,
    6. Thompson CB,
    7. et al.
    Effects of CD28 costimulation on long-term proliferation of CD4+ T cells in the absence of exogenous feeder cells. J Immunol 1997;159:5921–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  28. 28.↵
    1. Brown CE,
    2. Wright CL,
    3. Naranjo A,
    4. Vishwanath RP,
    5. Chang WC,
    6. Olivares S,
    7. et al.
    Biophotonic cytotoxicity assay for high-throughput screening of cytolytic killing. J Immunol Methods 2005;297:39–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Johnson LA,
    2. Heemskerk B,
    3. Powell DJ Jr.,
    4. Cohen CJ,
    5. Morgan RA,
    6. Dudley ME,
    7. et al.
    Gene transfer of tumor-reactive TCR confers both high avidity and tumor reactivity to nonreactive peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Immunol 2006;177:6548–59.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Milone MC,
    2. Fish JD,
    3. Carpenito C,
    4. Carroll RG,
    5. Binder GK,
    6. Teachey D,
    7. et al.
    Chimeric Receptors Containing CD137 Signal Transduction Domains Mediate Enhanced Survival of T Cells and Increased Antileukemic Efficacy In Vivo. Mol Ther 2009;17:1453–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Jackaman C,
    2. Bundell CS,
    3. Kinnear BF,
    4. Smith AM,
    5. Filion P,
    6. van HD,
    7. et al.
    IL-2 intratumoral immunotherapy enhances CD8+ T cells that mediate destruction of tumor cells and tumor-associated vasculature: a novel mechanism for IL-2. J Immunol 2003;171:5051–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. King MA,
    2. Covassin L,
    3. Brehm MA,
    4. Racki W,
    5. Pearson T,
    6. Leif J,
    7. et al.
    Human peripheral blood leucocyte non-obese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain gene mouse model of xenogeneic graft-versus-host-like disease and the role of host major histocompatibility complex. Clin Exp Immunol 2009;157:104–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Sood AK,
    2. Sorosky JI,
    3. Dolan M,
    4. Anderson B,
    5. Buller RE
    . Distant metastases in ovarian cancer: association with p53 mutations. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:2485–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Shuford WW,
    2. Klussman K,
    3. Tritchler DD,
    4. Loo DT,
    5. Chalupny J,
    6. Siadak AW,
    7. et al.
    4-1BB costimulatory signals preferentially induce CD8+ T cell proliferation and lead to the amplification in vivo of cytotoxic T cell responses. J Exp Med 1997;186:47–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Takahashi C,
    2. Mittler RS,
    3. Vella AT
    . Cutting edge: 4-1BB is a bona fide CD8 T cell survival signal. J Immunol 1999;162:5037–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Suhoski MM,
    2. Golovina TN,
    3. Aqui NA,
    4. Tai VC,
    5. Varela-Rohena A,
    6. Milone MC,
    7. et al.
    Engineering artificial antigen-presenting cells to express a diverse array of co-stimulatory molecules. Mol Ther 2007;15:981–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Lee UH,
    2. Kwack KB,
    3. Park JW,
    4. Kwon BS
    . Molecular cloning of agonistic and antagonistic monoclonal antibodies against human 4-1BB. Eur J Immunogenet 2002;29:9–52.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    1. Yi KH,
    2. Nechushtan H,
    3. Bowers WJ,
    4. Walker GR,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Pham DG,
    7. et al.
    Adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells stimulated ex vivo using herpes simplex virus amplicons encoding 4-1BBL persist in the host and show antitumor activity in vivo. Cancer Res 2007;67:10027–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Robbins PF,
    2. Li YF,
    3. El-Gamil M,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Wargo JA,
    6. Zheng Z,
    7. et al.
    Single and dual amino acid substitutions in TCR CDRs can enhance antigen-specific T cell functions. J Immunol 2008;180:6116–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Mukai S,
    2. Kjaergaard J,
    3. Shu S,
    4. Plautz GE
    . Infiltration of tumors by systemically transferred tumor-reactive T lymphocytes is required for antitumor efficacy. Cancer Res 1999;59:5245–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Palmer DC,
    2. Balasubramaniam S,
    3. Hanada K,
    4. Wrzesinski C,
    5. Yu Z,
    6. Farid S,
    7. et al.
    Vaccine-stimulated, adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells traffic indiscriminately and ubiquitously while mediating specific tumor destruction. J Immunol 2004;173:7209–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Craddock JA,
    2. Lu A,
    3. Bear A,
    4. Pule M,
    5. Brenner MK,
    6. Rooney CM,
    7. et al.
    Enhanced tumor trafficking of GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells by expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2b. J Immunother 2010;33:780–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Canevari S,
    2. Menard S,
    3. Mezzanzanica D,
    4. Miotti S,
    5. Pupa SM,
    6. Lanzavecchia A,
    7. et al.
    Anti-ovarian carcinoma anti-T3 heteroconjugates or hybrid antibodies induce tumor cell lysis by cytotoxic T-cells. Int J Cancer Suppl 1988;2:18–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Canevari S,
    2. Stoter G,
    3. Arienti F,
    4. Bolis G,
    5. Colnaghi MI,
    6. Di Re EM,
    7. et al.
    Regression of advanced ovarian carcinoma by intraperitoneal treatment with autologous T lymphocytes retargeted by a bispecific monoclonal antibody. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1463–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Lamers CH,
    2. Willemsen R,
    3. van Elzakker P,
    4. van Steenbergen-Langeveld S,
    5. Broertjes M,
    6. Oosterwijk-Wakka J,
    7. et al.
    Immune responses to transgene and retroviral vector in patients treated with ex vivo-engineered T cells. Blood 2011;117:72–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Berger C,
    2. Huang ML,
    3. Gough M,
    4. Greenberg PD,
    5. Riddell SR,
    6. Kiem HP
    . Nonmyeloablative immunosuppressive regimen prolongs In vivo persistence of gene-modified autologous T cells in a nonhuman primate model. J Virol 2001;75:799–808.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Johnson LA,
    2. Morgan RA,
    3. Dudley ME,
    4. Cassard L,
    5. Yang JC,
    6. Hughes MS,
    7. et al.
    Gene therapy with human and mouse T cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood 2009;114:535–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Figini M,
    2. Martin F,
    3. Ferri R,
    4. Luison E,
    5. Ripamonti E,
    6. Zacchetti A,
    7. et al.
    Conversion of murine antibodies to human antibodies and their optimization for ovarian cancer therapy targeted to the folate receptor. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009;58:531–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Morgan RA,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Kitano M,
    4. Dudley ME,
    5. Laurencot CM,
    6. Rosenberg SA
    . Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced With a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther 2010;18:843–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Low PS,
    2. Antony AC
    . Folate receptor-targeted drugs for cancer and inflammatory diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;56:1055–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Cancer Research: 71 (13)
July 2011
Volume 71, Issue 13

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
In Vivo Persistence, Tumor Localization, and Antitumor Activity of CAR-Engineered T Cells Is Enhanced by Costimulatory Signaling through CD137 (4-1BB)
De-Gang Song, Qunrui Ye, Carmine Carpenito, Mathilde Poussin, Li-Ping Wang, Chunyan Ji, Mariangela Figini, Carl H. June, George Coukos and Daniel J. Powell Jr.
Cancer Res July 1 2011 (71) (13) 4617-4627; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0422
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement