Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Tumor and Stem Cell Biology

Decreased Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis by mTOR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer

Vyomesh Patel, Christina A. Marsh, Robert T. Dorsam, Constantinos M. Mikelis, Andrius Masedunskas, Panomwat Amornphimoltham, Cherie Ann Nathan, Bhuvanesh Singh, Roberto Weigert, Alfredo A. Molinolo and J. Silvio Gutkind
Vyomesh Patel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina A. Marsh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert T. Dorsam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Constantinos M. Mikelis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrius Masedunskas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Panomwat Amornphimoltham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cherie Ann Nathan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bhuvanesh Singh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Weigert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alfredo A. Molinolo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Silvio Gutkind
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3192 Published November 2011
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction: Decreased Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis by mTOR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer - January 31, 2012

Abstract

Despite our improved understanding of cancer, the 5-year survival rate for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) patients remains relatively unchanged at 50% for the past three decades. HNSCCs often metastasize to locoregional lymph nodes, and lymph node involvement represents one of the most important prognostic factors of poor clinical outcome. Among the multiple dysregulated molecular mechanism in HNSCCs, emerging basic, preclinical, and clinical findings support the importance of the mTOR signaling route in HNSCC progression. Indeed, we observed here that the activation of mTOR is a widespread event in clinical specimens of HNSCCs invading locoregional lymph nodes. We developed an orthotopic model of HNSCC consisting of the implantation of HNSCC cells into the tongues of immunocompromised mice. These orthotopic tumors spontaneously metastasize to the cervical lymph nodes, where the presence of HNSCC cells can be revealed by histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation. Both primary and metastatic experimental HNSCC lesions exhibited elevated mTOR activity. The ability to monitor and quantitate lymph node invasion in this model system enabled us to explore whether the blockade of mTOR could impact HNSCC metastasis. We found that inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin and the rapalog RAD001 diminished lymphangiogenesis in the primary tumors and prevented the dissemination of HNSCC cancer cells to the cervical lymph nodes, thereby prolonging animal survival. These findings may provide a rationale for the future clinical evaluation of mTOR inhibitors, including rapamycin and its analogues, as part of a molecular-targeted metastasis preventive strategy for the treatment of patients with HNSCC. Cancer Res; 71(22); 7103–12. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

With approximately 500,000 new cases per year worldwide (1) and more than 11,000 expected deaths in 2009 in the United States alone (2), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) ranks sixth among the most common cancers in the world (3). Despite clear advancements in our understanding of cancer as a disease, the 5-year survival rate for HNSCC remains relatively unchanged at 50% for the past 3 decades (2, 3). Several important factors contribute to this bleak scenario, including late presentation and consequent delay in the diagnosis of HNSCC lesions, concomitant with the limited availability of effective therapeutic options to reduce the morbidity and mortality of advanced HNSCC cases (4–7). In this regard, the head and neck region includes a large fraction of all the lymph nodes of the human body, and with this rich lymphatic system, HNSCC has a high propensity to metastasize to locoregional lymph nodes (5, 8–12). Even in patients with no clinical evidence of lymph nodal metastasis (N0), the incidence of occult metastasis ranges from 10% to 50% (8–11), and the status of cervical lymph node metastasis is often considered the single most important prognostic factor in HNSCCs, with the presence of lymph node involvement decreasing the overall survival rate by nearly 50% (5, 9, 12).

Of interest, among the multiple molecular mechanism dysregulated in HNSCCs, emerging basic, preclinical, and clinical findings support the importance of Akt/mTOR signaling route in HNSCC progression (reviewed in ref. 7). Indeed, activation of mTOR and Akt, the latter acting upstream from mTOR, has been observed in more than 80% of all HNSCC lesions (6) often correlating with poor prognosis (13, 14). The activation of mTOR can result from the enhanced expression and activity of epidermal growth factor receptors that characterize HNSCC (15), as well as by the overexpression or the presence of activating mutations in the catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide-3-kinase α (16) or the decreased expression of the PIP3 phosphatase PTEN (17). Furthermore, interfering with mTOR activity in its complex 1 (mTORC1) by the use of specific inhibitors, such as rapamycin (sirolimus) and its analogues (e.g., CCI-779, also known as temsirolimus, and RAD001, known as everolimus), has been shown to provoke the rapid regression of HNSCC tumor xenografts (18), to prevent tumor regrowth in a minimal residual HNSCC xenograft model (19), and to decrease tumor burden and the malignant conversion of potential HNSCC precancerous lesions in multiple genetically defined and chemically induced animal models of HNSCC (20–22). These observations prompted us to examine whether mTOR is activated in human HNSCC lymph nodes metastasis and whether blocking mTOR prevents the metastatic spread of primary HNSCC lesions. We show here that the activation of mTOR is a widespread event in clinical specimens of HNSCCs invading locoregional lymph nodes. Furthermore, the prolonged treatment with rapamycin and RAD001 diminished the dissemination of HNSCC cancer cells to the cervical lymph nodes in a newly developed orthotopic HNSCC model, thereby prolonging animal survival. Thus, the use of mTOR inhibitors may represent a novel molecular-targeted approach for metastasis prevention in patients with HNSCC.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and reagents and cell culture

All chemicals and reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich, unless indicated. UMSCC2 and UMSCC17B cells were cultured as previously described (23, 24) in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Media supplemented with 10% FBS, at 37°C in 95% air/5% CO2, and both cell lines underwent DNA authentication (Genetica DNA Laboratories, Inc.) prior to the described experiments to ensure consistency in cell identity.

Establishment and treatment of orthotopic tumor xenografts in SCID/NOD mice

All animal studies were carried out according to NIH-approved protocols (ASP# 10-569), in compliance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Female severe combined immunodeficient (SCID)/NOD mice (NCI), 4 to 6 weeks of age and weighing 18 to 20 g were used in the study, were housed in appropriate sterile filter-capped cages, and fed and watered ad libitum. All cell and animal handling and tumor transplantation into the tongue are described in detail in Supplementary Material. Briefly, all animals bearing orthotopic HNSCC tumors underwent weekly evaluation of the tongue for disease onset, and the observed lesions were assessed for length and width, and tumor volume was determined as described previously (18). Animals were euthanized at the indicated time points and the cervical lymph nodes assessed for evidence of metastases.

Histopathologic and immunohistologic analysis

For histopathology, after fixing, each tongue was cut into 4 sections of approximately the same thickness, following its major axis (20), and tissue processing, immunohistochemical analysis, image acquisition, and staining quantification were conducted as described in Supplementary Material. Masson trichrome staining was carried out on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues as previously described (25).

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni or Newman–Keuls multiple comparison tests was used to analyze the differences of tumor mass volume between experimental groups and differences between immunohistochemical quantification of each group. The Mann–Whitney test was used to evaluate differences in total tumor area. Data analysis were done using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software); values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for each analysis as described in detail in Supplementary Material.

Results

As we have previously reported, the activation of mTOR is a widespread event in HNSCC, as judged by the immunohistochemical analysis of the presence of the phospho-serine ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) in representative human HNSCC tissue sections (Fig. 1A). These tumors are highly angiogenic, as revealed by the use of the vascular endothelial marker CD31 showing blood vessels within the stroma adjacent to the tumoral mass positive for pS6 (Fig. 1A). Most human HNSCC lesions are also highly lymphangiogenic (26), reflected by the presence of intratumoral lymphatic vessels staining positive for lymphatic vessel endothelia receptor 1 (LYVE-1). Indeed, the microvessel densities of vascular and lymphatic vessels were comparable when analyzing consecutive tissue sections of a representative group of HNSCC lesions (n = 5; Fig. 1B). Of interest, the presence of active mTOR was also clearly observed in the epithelial cells of all human-invaded HNSCC lymph nodes analyzed (n = 8); only isolated lymphocytic subpopulations showed cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in normal, noninvaded areas in human lymph nodes (Fig. 1C). Similarly, we also observed elevated levels of the serine 473 phosphorylated form of Akt (pAktS473), a downstream target of mTOR in its complex mTORC2 (27), in most tumor cells from all invaded lymph nodes evaluated (n = 8; Fig. 1C). All malignant cells displaying elevated pS6 and pAktS473 in invading tumors were of epithelial origin, as revealed by staining adjacent tissue sections for human cytokeratins (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Activation of mTOR in primary and metastatic HNSCC lesions. A, detection of pS6 and vascular and lymphatic vessels in primary HNSCC lesions. Consecutive sections from a representative HNSCC lesion were stained with H&E or immunostained for the phosphorylated form of S6 and the vascular (CD31) or LYVE-1 markers, as indicated. Arrows point to the corresponding blood and lymphatic vessels, respectively. B, microvessel quantification in primary HNSCC tumors immunoreacted with CD31 and LYVE-1 was conducted as described in the Materials and Methods section, using the IHC Microvessels Algorithm (Aperio). Average and SEM are presented for 5 representative HNSCC cases. Neither blood nor lymphatic vessels were observed in normal oral epithelium (not shown). C, representative human metastatic lymph node from a patient with oral squamous cell carcinoma, stained for cytokeratins (CK; top), pS6 (middle), and pAktS473 (bottom), showing the high levels of pS6 and pAktS473 expression in the metastatic epithelial cells. The higher magnification shows details of the malignant neoplastic cells; note how the areas showing pS6 and pAktS473 expression superimpose with the epithelial cell marker cytokeratin. The graph shows the percentage of pS6- and pAktS473-positive tumor cells in invaded human lymph nodes with SCC tumor, as evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Average and SEM are presented for 8 representative HNSCC cases with invaded lymph nodes.

To begin addressing whether molecular-targeted approaches could be used to prevent the spread of HNSCC to locoregional lymph nodes, we took advantage of the availability of highly invasive HNSCC cells to develop an orthotopic model of HNSCC metastasis. Few metastatic models are currently available in which lymph node metastases develop, albeit with limited efficiency (28–30). In particular, the evaluation of a large panel of HNSCC-derived cells led to the identification of 2 highly invasive human HNSCC cell lines, UMSCC2 and UMSCC17B. When orthotopically injected into the tongue of SCID/NOD mice, these HNSCC cells grew as highly aggressive tumors, invading the muscle and all surrounding tissues. For example, intraepithelial invasion was readily visible under microscopic evaluation (Fig. 2A and B for UMSCC2 cells and Supplementary Fig. S1A and S1B for UMSCC17B). Remarkably, these HNSCC cells also invaded the nerves and local lymph nodes, with visible tumor masses growing inside the lymphatic vessels (Fig. 2C and D and Supplementary Fig. S1C and S1D). These tumors are highly lymphangiogenic, reflecting a characteristic displayed by most human HNSCC lesions (26). Intratumoral lymphatic vessels staining positive for LYVE-1 were visible within the tumoral mass (Fig. 2E and Supplementary Fig. S1E). The adjacent muscle, which has extensive lymphatic networks, served as a positive control. These tumors are also highly angiogenic, as revealed by CD31 staining.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Local invasive growth and lymphangiogenesis of orthotopically implanted HNSCC cells into the tongue. A, H&E-stained tissue section of an HNSCC orthotopic tumor (delimited with dotted line) growing into the anterior half of a tongue 4 weeks postimplantation. UMSCC2 is a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma displaying keratinization (inset, black arrowhead) and granular differentiation (inset, white arrowhead). B, intraepithelial invasion by HNSCC cells. The invasive area is indicated by the white arrows. The black arrow points to the remaining normal epithelium. C, perineural infiltration. A group of HNSCC cells (black arrow) are seen growing surrounding a nerve structure (white arrow). This was a common finding in this orthotopic HNSCC model. D, subepithelial lymphatic permeation by HNSCC cells. The carcinoma tends to grow inside the lymphatic vessels; this finding was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (below). E, immunohistochemical identification of vascular (CD31) and LYVE-1 cells was conducted and the results quantified in control mice and the HNSCC orthotopic tumors. No blood or lymphatic vessels are observed in normal epithelium. Normal mucosa included the epithelium and subepithelial area between the epithelium and the muscle; muscle refers to the normal skeletal muscle of the tongue, and tumor to the malignant epithelial area and its stroma.

We next injected India ink orthotopically into lateral tongue to visualize the ink particles into the subcapsular area of the draining cervical lymph nodes (Fig. 3A and B). This enabled us to identify lymphatic drainage to 4 to 5 readily resectable cervical lymph nodes. Indeed, the metastatic spread of HNSCC cells growing orthotopically into the tongue could be visualized in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained lymph node sections as compared with noninvaded lymph nodes (Fig. 3C–E and Supplementary Fig. S2A–S2D). Nearly, all mice in the initial cohorts had at least one or more invaded lymph nodes when sacrificed 40 days after tumor implantation into the tongue (Fig. 3F and Supplementary Fig. S2E). This provided a simple and quantitative approach to examine the yet-to-be-identified factors contributing to lymph node metastasis and to attempt to halt this life-threatening process. Noninvaded lymph preserved their rich cortical network of normal lymphatic vessels (Fig. 3G and Supplementary Fig. S2F), whereas in metastatic lymph nodes, the tumor mass often displaces the lymphatic ducts (Fig. 3H and Supplementary Fig. S2G).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Metastasis of orthotopically implanted HNSCC cells into the tongue to locoregional cervical lymph nodes. A, India ink was injected into the tongue (white thick arrow) as a tracer for the lymphatic vasculature. The ink particles uptaken by the draining lymphatic vessels circulate into the cervical lymph nodes (thin arrows). B, distribution of India ink along the subcapsular sinus of a cervical lymph node, as indicated in the inset with yellow arrows. Afferent lymphatic vessels containing ink particles are also shown. The inset shows the black ink particles at a higher magnification. C, control, nonmetastatic cervical lymph node. The image shows a homogeneous structure in which lymphocytes are the predominant cells, as judged by histologic analysis of H&E-stained sections. D, metastatic lymph node. Histologic evaluation of H&E-stained sections indicates that the representative cervical lymph node includes the metastatic growth of UMSCC2 HNSCC cells in the area rounded by a dotted line. E, using a dissection microscope, 4 to 5 cervical lymph nodes were isolated from each mice. These 4 images at a high magnification depict the histologic features of a representative animal. Lymph nodes 1 and 2 show metastatic involvement, with the tumoral area (*) delimited by a dashed line; 3 and 4 show only reactive changes. F, percentage of metastatic lymph nodes per animal in mice carrying orthotopic UMSCC2 HNSCC xenografts. Most mice developed cervical lymph node metastases within 5 weeks post–tumor cell implantation. G, a histologic section of a noninvaded lymph node immunostained with anti-LYVE-1 antibody. A rich network of lymphatic vessels is evident in the cortical area of this node. The staining is mostly distributed in the cortical sinus and the cortex with less reactivity in the medulla. H, in a metastatic lymph node, the growing HNSCC tumor (delimited by a dotted line) pushes the lymphatic ducts outward. Within the tumor parenchyma, a few ducts can be seen in the periphery (inset); the central area is necrotic and thus devoid of any structures.

In normal murine oral mucosa and skin, mTOR is activated in the suprabasal layers lacking proliferative capacity, as judged by the accumulation pS6 (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. S3A). In contrast, the tumor area displayed high levels of pS6 throughout (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. S3A). Similarly, the invaded lymph nodes displayed high levels of pS6; however, the staining was not homogeneous, with necrotic areas and their adjacent cells likely harboring lower mTOR activity (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. S3B). Thus, both experimental and human HNSCC metastatic lesions are characterized by the presence of active mTOR pathway. Rapamycin and RAD001, which block mTOR in its complex mTORC1 (27), abolished the detection of pS6-positive cells in the primary tumor site and invaded lymph nodes after its administration to orthotopic tumor–bearing mice (Fig. 4C and D and Supplementary Fig. S3C and S3D), confirming that the accumulation of pS6 reflects the aberrant activity of mTOR in these tumoral lesions. Interestingly, rapamycin and RAD001 also reduced pAktS473 levels in the primary tongue lesions and their metastases, suggesting that these rapalogs can also reduce mTORC2 activity in HNSCC, likely indirectly, as observed after prolonged treatment with rapamycin of cultured cells (31).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin and RAD001 in HNSCC cells grown orthotopically into the tongue and in their spontaneous lymph node metastases. A, pS6 immunohistochemistry in UMSCC2 HNSCC orthotopic xenografts growing into a mouse tongue. The tumor area, circled by the dotted line, shows a high percentage of pS6-positive cells, as detailed in the inset. The suprabasal layers of the normal squamous epithelium of the tongue as well as other structures, such as the ducts of accessory salivary glands, are also positive. B, a representative metastatic cervical lymph node showing strong immunoreactivity for pS6 in the tumoral area. C, detection of pS6 and pAktS473 in HNSCC primary tumors and lymph node (LN) metastases in animals administered with vehicle control, rapamycin, and RAD001 for 48 hours. There was a remarkable decrease in pS6 and pAktS473 expression after rapamycin and RAD001 treatment. D, the graph shows the percentage of pS6-positive (top) and pAktS473-positive (bottom) tumors cells in primary HNSCC carcinomas (tongue) and their metastases (lymph node), as evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Rapamycin (rapa) and RAD001 treatments induced a significant reduction in the number of positive cells in the treated tumors and metastases as compared with the control vehicle-treated group. ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01.

These observations prompted us to explore the consequences of treating mice harboring HNSCC tumors with rapamycin and RAD001. Treatment was initiated approximately 10 days after tumor implantation into the tongue when primary tumors were visible in all mice. As shown in Fig. 5A–D and Supplementary Fig. S4A–S4D, the impact of rapamycin treatment was remarkable. Weekly tongue evaluation revealed a significant tumor growth inhibition caused by rapamycin and RAD001 administration (Fig. 5A and Supplementary Fig. S4A). Typical examples of tumor-bearing mice treated with vehicle control, rapamycin, and RAD001 for approximately 2 to 3 weeks are depicted (Fig. 5B and Supplementary Fig. S4B). The orthotopic tongue HNSCC model enabled the readily visualization of the tumoral lesions in the representative control and treated groups (Fig. 5C and Supplementary Fig. S4C). Quantification of the compromised tumoral area in each tongue showed a highly significant reduction of the affected tongue surface (Fig. 5D and Supplementary Fig. S4D).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin and RAD001 diminishes the growth of primary orthotopic HNSCC tumors. A, tumor growth in UMSCC2 HNSCC orthotopic xenografts in control versus rapamycin- and RAD001-treated mice. Animals bearing HNSCC tumors into the tongue were randomized into the vehicle (n = 37)-, rapamycin (n = 25)-, and RAD001 (n = 25)-treated groups and daily treatment regimen initiated. All animals underwent weekly tongue evaluation and tumor growth quantified as described in the Materials and Methods section. B, top, the primary tumor of an early- and late-stage orthotopic HNSCC lesion treated with vehicle for the indicated days, whereas the bottom shows a representative mouse treated with rapamycin (rapa) or RAD001. C, the images in the left show the individual tongues of representative mice in the vehicle-treated group versus the rapamycin- and RAD001-treated animals (Rapa, middle and RAD001, right, respectively). The tumor surface was mapped as described in Materials and Methods and shown in red in the cartoon in the bottom. D, the compromised areas in each tongue were digitally quantified. The surface of the affected area per tongue for each control vehicle- and rapamycin-treated mouse is indicated. Average and SE for each group are indicated. ***, P < 0.001.

The residual tumor in rapamycin- and RAD001-treated mice at the end of the observation period showed areas of squamous differentiation and fibrosis, in contrast to control-treated mice that showed active areas of cell growth (Fig. 6A–D and Supplementary Fig. S5A–S5D). Of interest, rapamycin and RAD001 did not affect the vascular microvessel density of the tumoral lesions and normal tissues in this orthotopic model (Fig. 6E and Supplementary Fig. S5E). However, they had a dramatic effect on the lymphatic system, as it prevented intratumoral lymphangiogenesis without perturbing the normal distribution of lymphatic vessels in the oral mucosa and muscle (Fig. 6E and Supplementary Fig. S5E). Aligned with this observation, rapamycin inhibits potently the proliferation of human lymphatic endothelial cells (Supplementary Fig. S6). On the other hand, the ability to monitor and quantitate lymph node invasion in this model system enabled us to explore whether the blockade of mTOR with rapamycin could impact HNSCC metastasis. As shown in Fig. 6F and Supplementary Fig. S5F, rapamycin and RAD001 treatment caused a remarkable decrease in the number of invaded lymph nodes, which was reflected in a significant increase in the overall survival of all rapamycin- and RAD001-treated animals (Fig. 6G and Supplementary Fig. S5G).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Inhibition of mTOR with rapamycin and RAD001 prevents the metastatic spread of primary HNSCC lesions to cervical lymph nodes, extending animal survival. A, patterns of tumor regression in rapamycin- and RAD001-treated UMSCC2 HNSCC xenografts. After rapamycin treatment, the remnant tumor has become lobulated, with blocks of neoplastic cells divided by dense collagen strands. Similar results were observed in RAD001-treated animals (not shown). In the H&E-stained tissue (inset), the collagen is evident by an increase in eosinophilic material between the cells. The small images on the right are higher magnification of the areas depicted as dotted squares, showing 2 stages in rapamycin-induced regression within the same slide. On top, apoptotic images can be identified within the tumoral mass (arrowheads). At bottom, intercellular edema and hemorrhages are evident. B–D, the increase in blue-stained collagen bands is evident in the rapamycin- and RAD001-treated animal (C and D, respectively) as compared with the vehicle-treated mouse (B). Masson trichrome staining. E, microvessel quantification in primary HNSCC tumors immunoreacted with CD31 and LYVE-1. There were no significant differences in CD31 expression between control vehicle and rapamycin- or RAD001-treated tumors. Rapamycin and RAD001 administration induced a significant decrease of lymphatic vessel density specifically within the tumor area, as judged by LYVE-1 staining (***, P < 0.001). F, percentage of metastatic lymph nodes in each animal in the vehicle- and rapamycin-treated groups. Rapamycin and RAD001 treatments induced a significant decrease the metastatic burden (***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01). G, survival rate curve of mice carrying UMSCC2 HNSCC orthotopic xenografts treated with vehicle (n = 26), rapamycin (n = 20), and RAD001 (n = 20). Treatment was started 10 days after HNSCC cell tongue implantation, when visible tumors were evident. As seen, all rapamycin- and RAD001-treated animals were alive at the end of the study, whereas, in contrast, all animals in the vehicle-treated group succumbed to disease (***, P < 0.001).

Discussion

Newly gained molecular understanding of HNSCC initiation and tumor evolution may soon afford the opportunity to delay or halt tumor progression. In this regard, among the multiple aberrant genetic, epigenetic, and signaling events known to occur in HNSCCs, the persistent activation of the Akt/mTOR pathway has emerged as potential drug target for HNSCC treatment. As supported by extensive preclinical investigation, the use of mTOR inhibitors, including rapamycin (sirolimus) and its analogues, CCI-779 (temserolimus), and RAD001 (everolimus), can dramatically reduce tumor burden and even recurrence in HNSCC tumor xenografts and in chemically induced and genetically defined animal models recapitulating HNSCC initiation and progression (18–22). Furthermore, recent clinical evaluation of temserolimus as neoadjuvant prior to definitive treatment has revealed that all predicted biochemical targets for mTOR inhibitors in this tumor type are hit in the clinical setting, at clinically relevant doses and with limited side effects, resulting in cancer cell apoptosis and tumor shrinkage (32). We now show that activation of the mTOR pathway is a frequent event in human metastatic HNSCC lesions. Furthermore, by the use of an orthotopic model of HNSCC in which the local tumoral invasion and lymph node metastasis can be readily assessed, we now show that mTOR inhibition with rapamycin can reduce tumoral growth in the tongue, one of its most frequent sites. As the immune system plays an important role in tumor metastasis, the implantation of human HNSCC cells in immunodeficient mice may not reflect the clinical situation fully. While keeping this potential limitation in mind, this orthotopic animal model revealed that the treatment with rapamycin prevents the metastatic spread of the HNSCC lesions, thereby prolonging animal survival.

The blockade of mTOR in experimental and clinical HNSCC lesions leads to a rapid decrease in the phosphorylated state of S6 and 4EBP1 (18, 20, 32), 2 downstream targets of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1; ref. 27), which also serves as a biomarker for the validation of the biochemical activity of mTOR inhibitors in their target tissues. In HNSCCs, rapamycin also causes a rapid decrease in the phosphorylation of Akt in serine 473 (18–20), a target for mTORC2 (27), suggesting that, as shown in cultured cell systems (31), prolonged exposure to rapamycin and its analogues can reduce mTORC2 activity, likely by an indirect, yet unknown mechanism. Similarly, we have observed a rapid blockade of mTORC2 in the HNSCC orthotopic model system, as judged by decreased levels of pAktS473. This effect could contribute to the antimetastatic activity of rapamycin, as mTORC2 is known to be involved in polarized cell migration in multiple cell types and even in model organisms (33, 34). Thus, the blockade of mTORC2 in HNSCCs might result in reduced migration of cancer cells toward chemoattractants often implicated in HNSCC metastasis, a possibility that is under current investigation.

Of interest, melanoma and HNSCCs are one of the few cancers in which intratumoral lymphangiogenesis is known to occur (35). Aligned with these observations, although angiogenesis is a frequent event in HNSCC models, we noticed the formation of a remarkable network of intratumoral lymphatic vessels in the primary tumor site, which was only observed in the orthotopic HNSCC system but not when tumors were implanted in other anatomic locations. The release of multiple lymphangiogenic growth factors by HNSCCs and stromal cells within the tumoral microenvironment in the tongue may account for this remarkable prolymphangiogenic activity of orthotopically implanted HNSCC cells and their metastatic potential (36–41), an issue that warrants further investigation. We also observed the growth of invading HNSCC cells within the lymphatic vessels, together suggesting that HNSCC cancer cells can promote the growth and recruitment of lymphatic endothelial cells or their progenitors and support their survival within the tumor microenvironment. This was nearly completely prevented by rapamycin and RAD001 treatment, supporting an antilymphangiogenic function of mTOR inhibitors when administered to mice bearing tumors in their natural microenvironment. This effect likely involves the impact of these rapalogs on mTOR function in the tumor cells and/or in the lymphatic endothelial cells, hence preventing lymphangiogenic signaling. While these possibilities are under investigation, we can conclude that our findings support a unique antilymphangiogenic function of mTOR inhibitors, which could have multiple beneficial clinical implications. Indeed, while further work may be required to define precisely how mTOR inhibitors act in HNSCC, the emerging information suggests that rapamycin may exert its antitumoral activity at multiple steps, reducing the growth and size of the primary tumor, preventing the formation of intratumoral lymphatic vessels, and likely reducing the migratory activity of HNSCC cells toward the lymph nodes, thus preventing the locoregional metastatic spread of primary HNSCC lesions.

Among the factors influencing patient outcome, the presence of lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis represents the most important factor predicting a poor prognosis (5, 9–12). Unfortunately, tumor recurrence in successfully treated patients with HNSCC is a frequent event, often accompanied with metastatic disease even in prior lymph node–negative cases (42). Indeed, patients with HNSCC often succumb to metastatic disease, compromising both quality of life and overall life expectancy. Unfortunately, there are still limited therapeutic options to prevent disease progression and locoregional and distant HNSCC spread. In this regard, the emerging preclinical and clinical information about the promising beneficial effects of mTOR inhibitors in HNSCCs and our present findings can now be exploited to prevent HNSCC recurrence and metastasis. Specifically, we can envision that the present study and prior reports may provide a rationale for the future clinical evaluation of rapamycin and its analogues in an adjuvant setting, as part of a molecular-targeted strategy for metastasis prevention after definitive treatment.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Alexander Sorkin (University of Pittsburgh) and Thomas Carey (University of Michigan) for the UMSCC2 and UMSCC17B cell lines, respectively.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received August 31, 2010.
  • Revision received September 6, 2011.
  • Accepted September 10, 2011.
  • ©2011 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Parkin DM,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Ferlay J,
    4. Pisani P
    . Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jemal A,
    2. Siegel R,
    3. Ward E,
    4. Hao Y,
    5. Xu J,
    6. Thun MJ
    . Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Warnakulasuriya S
    . Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2009;45:309–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Haddad RI,
    2. Shin DM
    . Recent advances in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1143–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Forastiere A,
    2. Koch W,
    3. Trotti A,
    4. Sidransky D
    . Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1890–900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Molinolo AA,
    2. Hewitt SM,
    3. Amornphimoltham P,
    4. Keelawat S,
    5. Rangdaeng S,
    6. Meneses Garcia A,
    7. et al.
    Dissecting the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling network: emerging results from the head and neck cancer tissue array initiative. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:4964–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Molinolo AA,
    2. Amornphimoltham P,
    3. Squarize CH,
    4. Castilho RM,
    5. Patel V,
    6. Gutkind JS
    . Dysregulated molecular networks in head and neck carcinogenesis. Oral Oncol 2009;45:324–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shah JP,
    2. Candela FC,
    3. Poddar AK
    . The patterns of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer 1990;66:109–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kuriakose MA,
    2. Trivedi NP
    . Sentinel node biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;17:100–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Clark JR,
    2. Naranjo N,
    3. Franklin JH,
    4. de Almeida J,
    5. Gullane PJ
    . Established prognostic variables in N0 oral carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:748–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Vokes EE,
    2. Weichselbaum RR,
    3. Lippman SM,
    4. Hong WK
    . Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 1993;328:184–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Leemans CR,
    2. Tiwari R,
    3. Nauta JJ,
    4. van der Waal I,
    5. Snow GB
    . Recurrence at the primary site in head and neck cancer and the significance of neck lymph node metastases as a prognostic factor. Cancer 1994;73:187–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Massarelli E,
    2. Liu DD,
    3. Lee JJ,
    4. El-Naggar AK,
    5. Lo Muzio L,
    6. Staibano S,
    7. et al.
    Akt activation correlates with adverse outcome in tongue cancer. Cancer 2005;104:2430–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Yu Z,
    2. Weinberger PM,
    3. Sasaki C,
    4. Egleston BL,
    5. Speier WF IV,
    6. Haffty B,
    7. et al.
    Phosphorylation of Akt (Ser473) predicts poor clinical outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:553–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kalyankrishna S,
    2. Grandis JR
    . Epidermal growth factor receptor biology in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2666–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fenic I,
    2. Steger K,
    3. Gruber C,
    4. Arens C,
    5. Woenckhaus J
    . Analysis of PIK3CA and Akt/protein kinase B in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2007;18:253–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lee JI,
    2. Soria JC,
    3. Hassan KA,
    4. El-Naggar AK,
    5. Tang X,
    6. Liu DD,
    7. et al.
    Loss of PTEN expression as a prognostic marker for tongue cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1441–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Amornphimoltham P,
    2. Patel V,
    3. Sodhi A,
    4. Nikitakis NG,
    5. Sauk JJ,
    6. Sausville EA,
    7. et al.
    Mammalian target of rapamycin, a molecular target in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res 2005;65:9953–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nathan CO,
    2. Amirghahari N,
    3. Rong X,
    4. Giordano T,
    5. Sibley D,
    6. Nordberg M,
    7. et al.
    Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as possible adjuvant therapy for microscopic residual disease in head and neck squamous cell cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:2160–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Czerninski R,
    2. Amornphimoltham P,
    3. Patel V,
    4. Molinolo AA,
    5. Gutkind JS
    . Targeting mammalian target of rapamycin by rapamycin prevents tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2:27–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Raimondi AR,
    2. Molinolo A,
    3. Gutkind JS
    . Rapamycin prevents early onset of tumorigenesis in an oral-specific K-ras and p53 two-hit carcinogenesis model. Cancer Res 2009;69:4159–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Amornphimoltham P,
    2. Leelahavanichkul K,
    3. Molinolo A,
    4. Patel V,
    5. Gutkind JS
    . Inhibition of Mammalian target of rapamycin by rapamycin causes the regression of carcinogen-induced skin tumor lesions. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:8094–101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Sano D,
    3. Pickering CR,
    4. Jasser SA,
    5. Henderson YC,
    6. Clayman GL,
    7. et al.
    Assembly and initial characterization of a panel of 85 genomically validated cell lines from diverse head and neck tumor sites. Clin Cancer Res 2011 Aug 25. [Epub ahead of print].
  24. 24.↵
    1. Duex JE,
    2. Sorkin A
    . RNA interference screen identifies Usp18 as a regulator of epidermal growth factor receptor synthesis. Mol Biol Cell 2009;20:1833–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. List K,
    2. Kosa P,
    3. Szabo R,
    4. Bey AL,
    5. Wang CB,
    6. Molinolo A,
    7. et al.
    Epithelial integrity is maintained by a matriptase-dependent proteolytic pathway. Am J Pathol 2009;175:1453–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Miyahara M,
    2. Tanuma J,
    3. Sugihara K,
    4. Semba I
    . Tumor lymphangiogenesis correlates with lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic parameters in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2007;110:1287–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Guertin DA,
    2. Sabatini DM
    . Defining the role of mTOR in cancer. Cancer Cell 2007;12:9–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Myers JN,
    2. Holsinger FC,
    3. Jasser SA,
    4. Bekele BN,
    5. Fidler IJ
    . An orthotopic nude mouse model of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:293–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Sano D,
    2. Myers JN
    . Xenograft models of head and neck cancers. Head Neck Oncol 2009;1:32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kawashiri S,
    2. Kumagai S,
    3. Kojima K,
    4. Harada H,
    5. Yamamoto E
    . Development of a new invasion and metastasis model of human oral squamous cell carcinomas. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1995;31B:216–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sarbassov DD,
    2. Ali SM,
    3. Sengupta S,
    4. Sheen JH,
    5. Hsu PP,
    6. Bagley AF,
    7. et al.
    Prolonged rapamycin treatment inhibits mTORC2 assembly and Akt/PKB. Mol Cell 2006;22:159–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ekshyyan O,
    2. Mills GM,
    3. Lian T,
    4. Amirghahari N,
    5. Rong X,
    6. Lowery-Nordberg M,
    7. et al.
    Pharmacodynamic evaluation of temsirolimus in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2010;32:1619–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hernandez-Negrete I,
    2. Carretero-Ortega J,
    3. Rosenfeldt H,
    4. Hernandez-Garcia R,
    5. Calderon-Salinas JV,
    6. Reyes-Cruz G,
    7. et al.
    P-Rex1 links mammalian target of rapamycin signaling to Rac activation and cell migration. J Biol Chem 2007;282:23708–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kamimura Y,
    2. Xiong Y,
    3. Iglesias PA,
    4. Hoeller O,
    5. Bolourani P,
    6. Devreotes PN
    . PIP3-independent activation of TorC2 and PKB at the cell's leading edge mediates chemotaxis. Curr Biol 2008;18:1034–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Pepper MS,
    2. Skobe M
    . Lymphatic endothelium: morphological, molecular and functional properties. J Cell Biol 2003;163:209–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Cao R,
    2. Bjorndahl MA,
    3. Gallego MI,
    4. Chen S,
    5. Religa P,
    6. Hansen AJ,
    7. et al.
    Hepatocyte growth factor is a lymphangiogenic factor with an indirect mechanism of action. Blood 2006;107:3531–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Bjorndahl M,
    2. Cao R,
    3. Nissen LJ,
    4. Clasper S,
    5. Johnson LA,
    6. Xue Y,
    7. et al.
    Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 induce lymphangiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15593–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Religa P,
    2. Cao R,
    3. Bjorndahl M,
    4. Zhou Z,
    5. Zhu Z,
    6. Cao Y
    . Presence of bone marrow-derived circulating progenitor endothelial cells in the newly formed lymphatic vessels. Blood 2005;106:4184–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Bjorndahl MA,
    2. Cao R,
    3. Burton JB,
    4. Brakenhielm E,
    5. Religa P,
    6. Galter D,
    7. et al.
    Vascular endothelial growth factor-a promotes peritumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Res 2005;65:9261–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Cao R,
    2. Bjorndahl MA,
    3. Religa P,
    4. Clasper S,
    5. Garvin S,
    6. Galter D,
    7. et al.
    PDGF-BB induces intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and promotes lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Cell 2004;6:333–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Cao Y
    . Opinion: emerging mechanisms of tumour lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:735–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Coatesworth AP,
    2. Tsikoudas A,
    3. MacLennan K
    . The cause of death in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:269–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 71 (22)
November 2011
Volume 71, Issue 22
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Decreased Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis by mTOR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Decreased Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis by mTOR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer
Vyomesh Patel, Christina A. Marsh, Robert T. Dorsam, Constantinos M. Mikelis, Andrius Masedunskas, Panomwat Amornphimoltham, Cherie Ann Nathan, Bhuvanesh Singh, Roberto Weigert, Alfredo A. Molinolo and J. Silvio Gutkind
Cancer Res November 15 2011 (71) (22) 7103-7112; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Decreased Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis by mTOR Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer
Vyomesh Patel, Christina A. Marsh, Robert T. Dorsam, Constantinos M. Mikelis, Andrius Masedunskas, Panomwat Amornphimoltham, Cherie Ann Nathan, Bhuvanesh Singh, Roberto Weigert, Alfredo A. Molinolo and J. Silvio Gutkind
Cancer Res November 15 2011 (71) (22) 7103-7112; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3192
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • mtDNA-Oncogene Cross-Talk
  • Alternative NFκB Regulates ALDH+ Ovarian Cancer Cells
  • R-Spondin1/LGR5 Activates TGFβ in Colon Cancer Metastasis
Show more Tumor and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement