Advertisement
Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology

The IL-8–Regulated Chemokine Receptor CXCR7 Stimulates EGFR Signaling to Promote Prostate Cancer Growth

Rajendra Kumar Singh and Bal L. Lokeshwar
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2769 Published May 2011

Abstract

The proinflammatory chemokine receptor CXCR7 that binds the ligands CXCL11 and CXCL12 (SDF-1a) is elevated in a variety of human cancers, but its functions are not understood as it does not elicit classical chemokine receptor signaling. Here we report that the procancerous cytokine IL-8 (interleukin-8) upregulates CXCR7 expression along with ligand-independent functions of CXCR7 that promote the growth and proliferation of human prostate cancer cells (CaP cells). In cell culture, ectopic expression or addition of IL-8 selectively increased expression of CXCR7 at the level of mRNA and protein production. Conversely, suppressing IL-8 signaling abolished the ability of IL-8 to upregulate CXCR7. RNAi-mediated knockdown of CXCR7 in CaP cells caused multiple antitumor effects, including decreased cell proliferation, cell-cycle arrest in G1 phase, and decreased expression of proteins involved in G1 to S phase progression. In contrast, addition of the CXCR7 ligand SDF-1a and CXCL11 to CaP cells did not affect cell proliferation. Over expression of CXCR7 in normal prostate cells increased their proliferation in a manner associated with increased levels of phospho-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor; pY1110) and phospho-ERK1/2. Notably, coimmunoprecipitation studies established a physical association of CXCR7 with EGFR, linking CXCR7-mediated cell proliferation to EGFR activation. Consistent with these findings, CXCR7-depleted CaP tumors grew more slowly than control tumors, expressing decreased tumor-associated expression of VEGF, cyclin D1, and p-EGFR. Together, these results reveal a novel mechanism of ligand-independent growth promotion by CXCR7 and its coregulation by the proinflammatory factor IL-8 in prostate cancer. Cancer Res; 71(9); 3268–77. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

Chemokines are proteins that participate in multitudes of normal and abnormal physiological processes, including inflammation, immunity, leukocyte chemotaxis, and tumor metastasis (1–4). The cysteine-X-cysteine chemokines (CXCL) with glutamine-leucine-arginine motif (ELR+ CXCL) regulate physiological functions by binding and activating 1 or more 7-transmembrane CXC chemokine receptors (CXCR; ref. 5). The CXCRs induce cell migration through the activation of a single or multiple members of structurally related GTP binding proteins, the G-proteins (6). The constitutive activation or overexpression of CXCL or CXCRs is linked to tumor growth and metastasis (7–9).

The newest member of the 7 CXCRs, CXCR7 (10), binds to 2 chemokines, CXCL11 and CXCL12 (SDF-1a) and dimerizes with CXCR4, a coreceptor for SDF-1a (11, 12). This dual specificity receptor is upregulated in many tumors. However, CXCR7 does not function like other CXCRs. CXCR7 binding to chemokines does not elicit intracellular calcium mobilization, or motility in normal cells, and thus its function has been intriguing (13). According to some reports, expression of CXCR7 provides “proliferation and survival advantage and increased adhesion properties” (13, 14). These reports did not elaborate, however, the mechanism by which CXCR7 allows growth advantage to tumor cells. Elevated levels of CXCR7 in tumors suggest its expression and function may be regulated by other factors, such as inflammatory chemokines [e.g., interleukin-8 (IL-8)] or tumor promoting transcription factors.

IL-8 is a multifunctional ELR+CXC chemokine that exerts multitude of cellular signaling in normal or tumor cells (15). We and others have previously reported that IL-8 is an autocrine growth factor that promotes tumor growth by inducing hormone independent growth, motility, invasion, and angiogenesis in prostate and other cancers via the distinct activation of two cognate receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2 (16–18). Here we show possible transregulation of CXCR4 and CXCR7 by IL-8 that could possibly contribute to increased proliferation and angiogenesis in CaP in a ligand-independent manner. Further, we report on the putative mechanism by which CXCR7 acts independent of its ligand binding and stimulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation, leading to mitogenic cascade and potentially a multitude of tumor promoting activities.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture methods

Acquisition and maintenance of all CaP cell lines (LNCaP, LAPC-4, and PC-3) were carried out by routine procedures as described (19). In brief, LNCaP, PC-3 were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS, 10%) and gentamicin. LAPC-4 cells were maintained in Iscove's medium with 7.5% FBS, 1 nmol/L dihydrotestosterone and gentamicin (16). RWPE-1 cells were cultured in keratinocyte serum-free medium with gentamicin. All cell lines were obtained from an authenticated source (ATCC) and used within 6 months of resuscitation of original cultures. The cell lines used in the study were also authenticated for their origin by Genetica DNA Laboratories Inc.

Global gene expression analysis

The global mRNA expression of IL-8 expressing LNCaP and LAPC-4 cells (LNCaP–IL-8S, LAPC-4–IL-8S, respectively) was compared with vector-only transfectants (v), generated as reported before (16), using Agilent cDNA expression array (Agilent Technologies). These studies were conducted at University of Miami's DNA Micro-array Core Facility, which also carried out the Bioinformatics analysis. To identify differentially expressed genes, mathematical “dye-swap” was carried out on arrays and 1-class significance analysis of microarrays (SAM; ref. 20) was done with the following criteria: false discovery rate was less than 5% and the average fold change was greater than 2. SAM was run on the expressed genes, where at least 2 out of 4 replicates passed quality control.

Gene knockdown with siRNA and quantitative real-time PCR

Cells cultured for 24 hours were transfected with gene-specific 21-mer siRNA sets (Smartpool siRNA, Dharmacon/Thermo Scientific Inc.), using Dharmafect-2 transfection protocol (17). Total RNA isolated from cells 48 hours later was subjected to cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using iQ SYBR-Green Supermix (BioRad) and the primers described in Supplementary Table S1. The mRNA levels were normalized to that of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) based on the threshold cycle (CRtR) of each sample in qPCR. Relative levels of mRNA expression were calculated from ΔCRtR, where ΔCRtR = (test mRNA CRtR − GAPDH CRtR). Values are shown as fold difference (FD), defined as: FD = [(2PΔCtP)P−1P × 100; ref. 17].

Stable silencing of CXCR7 expression by short hairpin RNA

CXCR7 shRNA (short hairpin RNA) and scrambled sequence shRNA (control shRNA) constructs were cloned into pRS plasmid under the control of U6 promoter for stable expression (HuSh-29mer, Origene Technology Inc.). CaP cells were transfected with shRNA-pRS using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Inc.). Stable transfectants were selected from transfected cultures following 2 weeks in puromycin selection medium (2.0 μg/mL) and evaluating the emergent cell colonies for CXCR7 mRNA knockdown by qPCR and immunoblotting with rabbit anti-CXCR7 IgG (catalogue no. GTX100027; GeneTex Inc.).

Stable expression of CXCR7 in RWPE-1 cells

These were transfected with a human full-length CXCR7 cDNA (True Clones, pCMV6-Neo vector; OriGene) using Lipofectamine 2000. Stable clones were selected with G418 (250 μg/mL) and analyzed for CXCR7 expression by qPCR and immunoblotting. Cell colonies overexpressing CXCR7 (RWCX7) were pooled for further analysis.

Cell proliferation assay and cell-cycle phase analysis

Cell proliferation and cell viability were determined by cell counting and MTT reduction assays, respectively (16, 17). Cell-cycle phase fractionation was carried out using a Beckman-Coulter XCEL flow cytometer (21, 22).

Immunoblotting

Expression of specific proteins in treated cells was analyzed by routine Western blotting. Presence of specific proteins on the Western blot was detected using the ECL+ Kit (GE Health Science) and relative protein band intensities were quantified using densitometry (Gel Logic 2200; Care-Stream Instruments; ref. 23).

Coimmunoprecipitation

Cell lysates were prepared in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA), centrifuged to obtain nuclei-free lysates, and then immunoprecipitated (24). In brief, lysates were incubated with anti-CXCR7 rabbit IgG [10 μg/mL; MBL International (Cat. No. LS-A1439)], with anti-EGFR rabbit monoclonal antibody (Epitomics Inc.) or normal rabbit IgG, overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with protein A–Sepharose beads for 6 hours at 4°C. The complexes were washed with RIPA buffer and bead bound proteins were eluted in SDS-gel sample buffer, and visualized by immunoblotting.

Tumor generation in athymic mice

Studies on mice were conducted under an NIH approved institutional vertebrate animal-research protocol. Control (PC-3–V) or CXCR7 shRNA transfectants (PC-3–T73 and PC-3–T74) were implanted into the right and left dorsal flanks of 6-week-old athymic mice (1 × 106 cells/site in 50% Matrigel, 5 animals × 2 sites/group; Charles River Labs). Tumor growth was determined by biweekly measurement of tumor volumes for 42 days (25). The expression for VEGF, CXCR7 mRNA, and p-EGFR proteins in tumor tissues were analyzed ex vivo, using tumor tissues collected at necropsy as described before (26).

Results

Malignant prostate tumor cells express high levels of CXCR7

As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1A, CaP cells express high level of CXCR7 mRNA and protein as compared with RWPE-1 cells which express very low levels of CXCR7. LNCaP cells expressed highest level of CXCR7 mRNA (FD = 2.2), followed by PC-3 (1.3), LAPC-4 (1.0), and RWPE-1 cells (0.094). LNCaP and LAPC-4 cells, expressed relatively high levels of CXCR4 than that of PC-3. Further, the level of CXCR4 mRNA was 5- to 10-fold lower than that of CXCR7 (Table 1). As many tumor cells coexpress both ligands and receptors, we measured the levels of the target chemokines (SDF-1a and CXCL11). The mRNA or protein expression of CXCL11 and SDF-1a in all CaP cells was insignificant (Table 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

IL-8 upregulates CXCR7 and downregulates CXCR4 expression in prostate cells. A, detection of CXCR4 and CXCR7 proteins in CaP and normal cells by Western blotting (LN, LNCaP; LA, LAPC-4; RW, RWPE-1). B, CXCR7 (i) and CXCR4 (ii) mRNA. C, CXCR7 protein levels in LNCaP and LAPC-4 cells continuously expressing IL-8 (IL8-S) and their vector-only transfectants (e.g., IL-8V). D, increased expression of CXCR7 mRNA (i) and protein levels (ii and iii) following IL-8 addition to growth factor–starved (24 hours) RWPE-1 and LNCaP cells, respectively.

View this table:
Table 1.

Expression of CXCR chemokines and their receptors in normal prostate and tumor cells

Global gene expression analysis of IL-8 secreting CaP cells show significant upregulation of CXCR7

We previously reported that constitutive expression of IL-8 in LNCaP and LAPC-4 cells (IL-8S) induce a variety of proinvasive and metastatic function (16). We compared here the gene expression profile between IL-8S and vector control cultures (V) by cDNA microarray. We found 549 and 377 genes had altered expression in IL-8S cells of LNCaP and LAPC-4, respectively, compared with those of V control pairs. Among them, as shown in Supplementary Table S2, the analysis found the expressions of CXCR7, CXCR4, CD82, caspase-10, MMP-9, VEGF-A, and WISP-2 were consistently altered in both IL-8S transfectants. Importantly, we found 18- and 29-fold increases (Supplementary Table S2) in CXCR7 mRNA expression in LAPC-4–IL-8S and LNCaP IL-8S cells, respectively. We further validated the expression of CXCR7 by qPCR and immunoblotting. The CXCR7 mRNA and protein levels were 6- to 8-fold and more than 2-fold higher in IL-8 transfectants than that of the respective vector-only transfectants (Fig. 1B and C).

External addition of IL-8 induced immediate increase in CXCR7 expression

As shown in Figure 1D(i), a rapid increase in CXCR7 mRNA was observed (≤15 minutes) after addition of 3 nmol/L IL-8 to RWPE-1 and LNCaP cells, but not to PC-3 cells (which constitutively produce IL-8). We observed a time-dependent increase in CXCR7 protein following IL-8 stimulation of RWPE-1 and LNCaP cultures [Fig. 1D(ii and iii)]. The IL-8–induced increase of CXCR7 in RWPE-1 cells was more sustained (≥4 hours) when compared with that of LNCaP (≤1 hour), which stabilized after 1 hour with a sustained increase of 55% [Fig. 1D(iii)]. This rapid increase in CXCR7 mRNA following IL-8 addition was due to de novo CXCR7 synthesis as it was completely abolished if incubated with 10 μg/mL Actinomycin D (data not shown). Although external addition of IL-8 did not increase CXCR7 mRNA level in PC-3 cells, which endogenously produce IL-8, depletion of IL-8 in these cells by RNAi caused 73.3% reduction in CXCR7 mRNA as compared with that of c-siRNA transfectants (Fig. 1B). However, CXCR7 depletion did not significantly affect the level of IL-8 mRNA [Supplementary Fig. S1(i)]

Reciprocal regulation of CXCR4 and CXCR7 by IL-8 in CaP cells

The cDNA expression analyses showed that IL-8 producing LAPC-4 and LNCaP cells express lower level of CXCR4 mRNA than that of controls (V) cells (Supplementary Table S2). We validated by qPCR that LNCaP-V and LAPC-4V cells expressed 2- to 3-fold higher levels of CXCR4 mRNA than their IL-8S counterparts [Fig. 1B(ii)]. Further, depletion of IL-8 in PC-3 cells by siRNA increased the expression of CXCR4 mRNA by 5-fold [Fig. 1B(ii)]. In addition, silencing of CXCR7 by siRNA in both LNCaP-V and PC-3 cells slightly increased CXCR4 mRNA [P > 0.05; Supplementary Fig. S1(ii)]. However, depletion of CXCR4 expression by siRNA in LNCaP cells increased CXCR7 mRNA by 2.5× (250%) but only modestly (∼50%) in PC-3 cells [Supplementary Fig. S1(iii)].

Both CXCR1 and CXCR2 are required for IL-8–induced CXCR7 expression

As IL-8–induced intracellular signal transduction occurs via its binding to 2 cell-surface receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2 (27, 28), we used receptor-specific inhibitors [Repertaxin-Lysine (Sigma) for CXCR1 and SB 225002 (Chemicon) for CXCR2; ref. 29] to abrogate IL-8–induced CXCR7 upregulation. Both inhibitors were effective in abolition of IL-8–induced increase in CXCR7 mRNA [Supplementary Fig S1(iv)].

CXCR7 is essential for cell proliferation in CaP cells

Wang and colleagues (14) reported that CXCR7 depletion in C4-2B cells, a derivative of LNCaP cell line, decreased their tumor growth in nude mice (14, 30). We verified the biological significance of CXCR7 in other CaP cells by multiple approaches. Transient depletion of CXCR7 in CaP cells by CXCR7 siRNA caused more than 90% decrease in mRNA and more than 65% decrease in protein expression [Supplementary Fig. S2(i)]. As shown in Figure 2A, depletion of CXCR7 significantly decreased the proliferation of PC-3 (55%), LNCaP-V (67%), and LNCaP-IL-8-S (40%) cells at 72 hours posttransfection. Because siRNA-mediated gene silencing lasts 72 or less hours (31), we generated stable CXCR7-depleted lines of CaP cells (T73 and T74) using shRNA transfection. T73 and T74 clones showed decreased level of CXCR7 mRNA and protein (Fig 2B, inset) and cell counts on day 7 showed a significant (≥63%) reduction in cell density, compared with those in vector–only transfected cells (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

CXCR7 depletion causes inhibition of proliferation in CaP cells: A, decrease in cell density (cells/well, mean ± SEM) of CaP cell cultures following depletion of CXCR7 by siRNA. B, decreased cell growth in PC-3 or LNCaP cells, stably expressing either control shRNA (V) or CXCR7 shRNA (T74), determined by cell counting. Western blot analysis of CXCR7 in the cells transfected with V and T74 shRNA (inset). C, cell density of PC-3 cultures expressing either control shRNA (PC-3–V) or CXCR7 shRNA (PC-3–T74) in the presence or absence of CXCL11 (CX11) or SDF1 (50 ng/mL), cultured with 10% FBS or without FBS (ITS) medium for 7 days. D, cell viability determined by MTT reduction assay in PC-3 cells transiently transfected with indicated siRNA. Data presented are mean ± S.E.M. n = 3; *, P < 0.05 versus control, Student's t-test.

Growth-promoting activity of CXCR7 in CaP cells does not require its known ligands

Because CXCR7 depletion leads to decreased cell growth, we postulated that the activation of CXCR7 by its known ligand(s) is responsible for CXCR7-dependent cell proliferation. Because we could not detect autocrine production of CXCL11 or SDF-1a in CaP cell cultures, we added CXCL11, CXCL12, or both, 50 ng/mL each, to cultures of PC-3, LNCaP, and corresponding CXCR7-shRNA-depleted clones (T74). We found little change (less than 3% increase) in cell growth of PC-3–V or PC-3–T74 cells (that express CXCR4, but CXCR7 was depleted), after 7 days of culture with CXCL11 or SDF-1a, regardless of whether the cells were cultured in the medium supplemented with or without FBS [10%; Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S2(ii and iii)].

As CaP cells express both CXCR4 and CXCR7 (14), and both share SDF-1a as a ligand (13), we investigated whether CXCR4 depletion affects the PC-3 cells' growth. Depleting CXCR4 mRNA by siRNA reduced CXCR4 mRNA in cells by more than 85% but did not affect cell proliferation when compared with control or CXCR7 siRNA transfectants (Fig. 2D). However, silencing of both CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression together, reduced cell proliferation by 52.33% ± 8.0%, similar to a level of inhibition observed by depleting CXCR7 only (47.5% ± 3.5%; Fig. 2D).

CXCR7 depletion blocks cell-cycle progression in CaP cells

As shown in Figure 3A, PC-3 or LNCaP cells transfected with CXCR7 siRNA, showed increased accumulation in G0/G1 phase, by 52%, compared with that of c-siRNA transfectants. Further, this increased accumulation led to a significant decrease in S-phase (54% ± 6.5%) and in G2/M fractions (12% ± 2.5%) in PC-3 cultures. CXCR7 depletion in LNCaP cells led to a greater accumulation of G0/G1 (68% ± 2.5%), and decrease in S-and G2/M phase fractions (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

CXCR7 depletion causes cell-cycle arrest in CaP cells. A, percentage of cells in each cell-cycle phase was estimated from flow cytometry analysis of DNA contents in CaP cells 48 hours after transfection with CXCR7 siRNA or c-siRNA. B, DNA content histograms of CaP cells transfected with c-siRNA or CXCR7 siRNA. C, comparison of expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins by Western blotting as in A, and relative expression (R.I.) shown are normalized to protein band intensities of β-actin. D, levels of p-Erk1/2 measured with an ELISA in c-siRNA (c-si), CXCR7 siRNA (CXC7si), CXCR7shRNA (T74), or V transfectants following EGF stimulation (5 nmol/L, 10 minutes). The p-Erk1/2 levels were lower in CXCR7 depleted PC-3 cells (27% in siRNA and 63% in shRNA-depleted PC-3 cells; *, P ≤ 0.05, n = 3).

CXCR7 depletion decreases G1 to S transition–regulating proteins in CaP cells

CXCR7 depletion by siRNA significantly decreased cell-cycle regulatory proteins, cyclin D1, cyclin E, and Rb (p-Rb) in both PC-3 and LNCaP cells (Fig. 3C). We found 40-fold decrease in cyclin D1, 1.5- to 2-fold decreases in Cdk-4, and 2- to 6.5-fold decreases in cyclin B1, in both CaP cells (Fig. 3C) and significantly increased P21 (11.5× in PC-3 and 15× in LNCaP) protein levels, but none in P27Pkip1 protein levels.

An accumulation at G0/G1 and depletion of S-phase fraction in cultures depleted of CXCR7 could be due to the attenuation of MAP-kinase activity. Therefore, we measured the relative activation of extracellular signal–regulated receptor kinase-1/2 (Erk1/2 ratio of p-Erk1/2) in c-siRNA and CXCR7 siRNA–transfected PC-3 cells, using an ELISA. Levels of p-Erk1/2 in CXCR7 siRNA–transfected cells were 31.70% ± 4% lower than that of c-siRNA–transfected PC-3 (Fig. 3D). To further validate the association of CXCR7 in Erk1/2 phosphorylation, we compared the Erk1/2 activity in PC-3–T74 cells with that of V transfectants. Again, p-Erk1/2 activity was markedly diminished in CXCR7-depleted cells (Fig. 3D).

Constitutive expression of CXCR7 in normal prostate epithelial cells increases cell proliferation

The CXCR7-expressing RWPE-1 cells (RWCX7) showed 23% ± 3.5% increase in cell growth (Fig. 4A) than the vector-only–transfected RWPE-1 cells (RW-V).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Forced expression of CXCR7 increases cell proliferation and p-EGFR levels. A, increase in cell density of RWPE-1 cultures stably expressing CXCR7 (RWCX7) as compared with RW-V cells. B, a comparison of levels of p-EGFR, p-Erk1/2, and cyclin D1 in cells described in A and CaP cells. C, levels of p-EGFR and p-Erk1/2 in CaP cells following transient transfection with either c-siRNA (c-si) or CXCR7 siRNA (CX7) and stimulated with EGF (5 nmol/L) for 5 minutes. CXCR7 siRNA transfectants had lower level of p-EGFR and p-Erk1/2 than that of c-siRNA–transfected cells (C, lanes 2 and 4). D, Western blots of p-EGFRy1110 from cells described in A that were growth factor starved for 24 hours and then stimulated with 5 nmol/L EGF, CXCL11, or SDF-1 (both 100 ng/mL). Total EGFR and β-actin levels are shown as loading controls.

CXCR7 stimulates EGFR phosphorylation

Strong change in ERK1/2 activity on CXCR7 depletion led us to test potential association of CXCR7 with growth factor receptors such as EGFR (32). Indeed, we observed constitutively increased phosphorylation of EGFR and Erk1/2 in cells that express high level of CXCR7, such as RWCX7, LNCaP, and PC-3 but not in RWPE-1 cells [Fig. 4B; also see Supplementary Fig. S3(i and ii) for quantitation]. CXCR7-depleted cells showed lower levels of both p-EGFR and p-Erk1/2, as compared with those in c-siRNA transfectants (Fig. 4C, see also Fig. 3D).

As CXCR7 expression stimulates cell proliferation without its ligand, we hypothesized that activation of EGFR and Erk1/2 phosphorylation may also be independent of CXCR7 ligands. We noticed increase in p-EGFR following stimulation with EGF, but not by SDF-1a, or CXCL11. As shown in Figure 4D, p-EGFR levels remained unchanged in cultures exposed to recombinant SDF-1a, or CXCL11 in both RWPE-1 and RWCX7 cells, indicating ligand-independent role of CXCR7 in EGFR activation. In contrast, there was a time-dependent increase in p-EGFR in RWCX7 cells following stimulation with EGF, suggesting expression of CXCR7 increases the activation of EGFR either constitutively (compare p-EGFR levels in lane 1 of RWPE-1 with lane 5 of RWCX7 in Fig. 4D) or when stimulated with EGF [lanes 4 and 8, respectively, in Fig. 4D, also see Supplementary Fig. S3(iii)].

CXCR7 colocalizes with EGFR

As expression of CXCR7 constitutively activates EGFR, we examined whether CXCR7 and EGFR colocalize or aggregate on plasma membrane (33). We attempted to coimmunoprecipitate CXCR7 and EGFR from RWPE-1 or CaP cells, using anti-EGFR or anti-CXCR7 antibodies and nonionic, detergent-solubilized cell lysates. As shown in Figure 5A and B, both molecules are immunoprecipitated by either anti–p-EGFR or anti-CXCR7 antibodies. We showed further more p-EGFR in RWCX7 cells than that in RWPE-1V cells and CXCR7 overexpression increased phosphorylation of EGFR only at tyrosine1110 but, not serine1070–71 (Fig. 5C). In addition, we carried out confocal microscopy of LNCaP cells labeled with anti-EGFR (mouse anti-human IgG) and anti-CXCR7 (rabbit anti-human IgG; GeneTex Inc.) antibodies followed by fluorescent labeling with secondary antibodies labeled with Alexafluor 555 and Alexfluor488, respectively. The confocal micrographs, although could not completely reveal whether the colocalization of CXCR7 and EGFR is inside or outside of the plasma membrane, showed several focal points at which the colocalization of 2-labeled antibodies were observed (see Supplementary Fig. S4A–D).

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

CXCR7 associates with EGFR in CaP cells. A and B, demonstration of coimmunoprecipitation of CXCR7 and EGFR. Cell lysates of PC-3 and LNCaP were immunoprecipitated with CXCR7 antibody followed by Western blotting against p-EGFR and vice versa. C, EGFR coprecipitated with CXCR7 in RWCX7 cells. RW-CX7 cells or control vector (RW-V) were immunoprecipitated with CXCR7 antibody followed by Western blotting with an anti-p-EGFR (pY1110) or an antibody recognizing phospho-Ser at residues 1070–1071 in EGFR (pS1070–71; Epitomics).

Stable silencing of CXCR7 in CaP cells decreases tumor growth in vivo

We characterized in vivo tumor growth of 2 CXCR7-depleted PC-3 sublines, T73 and T74, and compared their tumor growth with that of vector-only transfectants. The T73 and T74 cells express reduced levels of CXCR7 mRNA (by 61.23%± 1.2% and 70.57% ± 2.2%), and proteins (50% and 75%), compared with PC-3V cells (Fig. 2). We found a significant growth delay (>35%) in both T73 and T74 tumors at the time of terminal measurement on day 42 (Fig. 6A). A significant difference in the slopes of the tumor growth from day 22 to 42 in the control versus T73 or T74 tumors further verified the slow growth rate of CXCR7-depleted tumor cells. Furthermore, ex vivo analysis of tumor tissues revealed a significant decrease in CXCR7 expression in T73 and T74 tumors (Fig. 6B). In addition, there was a significant decrease in p-EGFR as compared with total EGFR and cyclin D1 levels (Fig. 6C), and VEGF mRNA (Fig. 6D) in T73 and T74 tissues as compared with PC-3V tumors, suggesting a link between tumor growth and decrease in angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and cell-cycle arrest resulting from CXCR7 depletion.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

CXCR7 depletion slows PC-3 tumor growth in mice. A, tumor growth over time in athymic mice was recorded for mice injected with PC-3 cells stably expressing CXCR7 shRNA (T73 and T74) or scrambled sequence shRNA (V). B, blots of CXCR7, cyclin D1 p-EGFR CXCR7 tumor tissue of PC-3–V, PC-3–T73, and PC-3–T74. C and D, CXCR7 and VEGF mRNA level were decreased in T73 and T74 tumors as analyzed by qPCR. There was a significant delay (P < 0.03) in tumor growth and in the terminal tumor volume of T73 and T74 tumors.

Discussion

We report a novel mechanism of transregulation of chemokine/receptor-induced alteration in prostate tumor cells. We report 4 major observations: first, transient exposure or constitutive expression of a proinflammatory chemokine (IL-8) modulates nontarget chemokine receptors (CXCR4 and CXCR7); second, although CXCR7 is a “decoy” receptor, it is highly modulated by IL-8, it is constitutively upregulated in tumor cells, extensively involved in cell proliferation; thereby participating in multiple protumorigenic activities. Third, CXCR7 is capable of modulating a variety of cellular functions without being activated by its identified ligands (CXCL11 and SDF-1a). Finally, CXCR7 is capable of stimulating cell proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and angiogenesis by coupling/colocalizing with EGFR. The last attribute may be responsible for increased tumor growth due to CXCR7 elevation.

The observation that extrinsic addition of IL-8 also results in a rapid rise in CXCR7 expression shows a dynamic interaction between IL-8–induced intracellular signaling that results in transcriptional upregulation of CXCR7 and downregulation of CXCR4. Further, an induction of CXCR7 by external IL-8 was more pronounced in cells that do not constitutively express IL-8, such as RWPE-1 and LNCaP, but not the cells (PC-3) that constitutively synthesize it (Fig. 1D). This subdued response in PC-3 cells may be due to desensitization of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in the presence of constitutively produced IL-8. The regulation of CXCR7 by IL-8 in PC-3 cells was further supported by RNAi studies, where as expected, downregulation of IL-8 decreased CXCR7 and increased CXCR4 levels (Fig. 1B). However, IL-8 may be one of the several factors modulating CXCR7 and reciprocally regulate both receptors.

Berahovich and colleagues (34) were unable to detect ligand binding or cell surface expression of CXCR7 in PC-3 cells and they disputed earlier work by Wang and colleagues (14) that observed PC-3 expression of CXCR7 in PC-3 may be attributed to nonspecific nature of some commercial antibodies (34). We have revisited this claim by testing CXCR7 expression on PC-3 cell surface with immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry using antibodies from several commercial sources (R&D Systems and GeneTex Inc.) and with qPCR. In all these tests, we found positive expression of CXCR7 in PC-3 cells and the fluorescence intensity corresponded with the level of CXCR7 expression as verified by qPCR (see Figs. 1, 2 and 4–6 and Supplementary Fig. S5).

We showed that inhibition of IL-8–specific receptors, CXCR1 or CXCR2 can abrogate IL-8–induced CXCR7 upregulation [Supplementary Fig. S1(iv)]. This could be due to the coregulation of CXCR2 by CXCR1, as we previously reported (26, 35). As receptor cross-linking between CXCR1 and CXCR2 is required in IL-8–mediated intracellular signaling (36), it is likely that both receptors are essential for IL-8–mediated upregulation of CXCR7.

In contrast to CXCR7, IL-8 negatively regulates CXCR4 in CaP cells. When autocrine production of IL-8 was halted by RNAi, CXCR4 mRNA levels rose 4-fold in PC-3 cells, indicating, IL-8 down modulates the transcription of CXCR4 (Fig. 1B(ii)). Although CXCR4 is implicated in bone metastasis of CaP, its relative abundance on CaP cells is significantly lower than CXCR7, and therefore, these 2 receptors may play more complex roles in bone metastasis of CaP than previously thought (37).

Our findings have relevance to prostate cancer in men, where inflammation is considered a significant cause of disease progression (38–42). As IL-8 is a ubiquitous chemokine induced by acute or chronic inflammation, hypoxia, or necrosis, IL-8 is widely available in tumor microenvironment (43, 44). Furthermore, we reported previously that IL-8 expression in primary CaP tissues strongly correlates with biochemical (PSA) recurrence (45). Increased serum IL-8 levels have been reported in patients with advanced, metastatic CaP, indicating systemic increase in IL-8 (46). As survival following androgen deprivation is a critical step in the emergence of castration-resistant tumors, IL-8–induced upregulation of CXCR7 may enhance the survival and proliferation of those tumor cells. These finding suggest that elevated CXCR7 on CaP cells may be associated with autocrine IL-8 synthesis plausibly induced by inflammatory factors in the tumor microenvironment.

At present, little is known about ligand-independent, chemokine receptor–mediated, mitogenic signaling [47, 48]. Our results show that overexpression of CXCR7 alone is sufficient to increase cell proliferation in both normal and transformed cells (Figs. 2A and 4A). Furthermore, increased CXCR7 expression also led to, constitutively and rapidly, EGF-induced increase of p-EGFR (Fig. 4B). We found a stable complex formation between EGFR and CXCR7 in CaP cells that over express CXCR7, by 2 independent techniques (Fig. 5A–C, and Supplementary Fig. S4A–D).

We found CXCR7-depleted PC-3 cells grow significantly slower in vitro and their tumors grew much slower in vivo, indicating CXCR7 may indeed control CaP cell proliferation in vivo. Further, CXCR7-depleted tumor tissues show significantly reduced, cyclin D1, VEGF mRNA, and p-EGFR, further suggesting multiple roles of CXCR7 in tumorigenesis. These and other reports (13, 14) show CXCR7 may facilitate adhesion between tumor cells and host (mouse) endothelial cells that might induce rapid angiogenesis and tumor growth. In conclusion, present discoveries highlight the novel mechanism of chemokine and chemokine receptor interactions to facilitate proliferation and cell survival. The relative contribution of CXCR7 over CXCR4 in several CaP cells examined in this report, further corroborate the possibility of prominent role of CXCR7 in prostate, and potentially in other epithelial cancers.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict with any commercial entity.

Grant Support

NIH R01AT003544 (B.L. Lokeshwar) and VA MERIT (VA5312.01; B.L. Lokeshwar).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dominic Lyn for studies on mice and Dr. Vinata Lokeshwar for use of her BioRad PCR instrument. Many helpful discussions with Drs. Krishna Jala, Haribabu Boddaluri (University of Louisville, KY), and Yehiya Daaka (University of Florida) are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received July 28, 2010.
  • Revision received February 28, 2011.
  • Accepted March 5, 2011.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cyster JG
    . Chemokines and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Science 1999;286:2098–102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pierce KL,
    2. Premont RT,
    3. Lefkowitz RJ
    . Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002;3:639–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Murphy PM
    . Chemokine receptors: structure, function and role in microbial pathogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 1996;7:47–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zlotnik A,
    2. Morales J,
    3. Hedrick JA
    . Recent advances in chemokines and chemokine receptors. Crit Rev Immunol 1999;19:1–47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rossi D,
    2. Zlotnik A
    . The biology of chemokines and their receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 2000;18:217–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Thelen M
    . Dancing to the tune of chemokines. Nat Immunol 2001;2:129–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Müller A,
    2. Homey B,
    3. Soto H,
    4. Ge N,
    5. Catron D,
    6. Buchanan ME,
    7. et al.
    Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 2001;410:50–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Dorsam RT,
    2. Gutkind JS
    . G-protein-coupled receptors and cancer. Nat Rev 2007;7:79–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Murphy P
    . Chemokines and molecular basis of cancer metastasis. N Engl J Med 2003;354:833–5.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Balabanian K,
    2. Lagane B,
    3. Infantino S,
    4. Chow KY,
    5. Harriague J,
    6. Moepps B,
    7. et al.
    The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 binds to and signals through the orphan receptor RDC1 in T lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 2005;280:35760–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Levoye A,
    2. Balabanian K,
    3. Baleux F,
    4. Bachelerie F,
    5. Lagane B
    . CXCR7 heterodimerizes with CXCR4 and regulates CXCL12-mediated G protein signaling. Blood 2009;113:6085–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hartmann TN,
    2. Grabovsky V,
    3. Pasvolsky R,
    4. Shulman Z,
    5. Buss EC,
    6. Spiegel A,
    7. et al.
    A crosstalk between intracellular CXCR7 and CXCR4 involved in rapid CXCL12-triggered integrin activation but not in chemokine-triggered motility of human T lymphocytes and CD34+ cells. J Leukoc Biol 2008;84:1130–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Burns JM,
    2. Summers BC,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Melikian A,
    5. Berahovich R,
    6. Miao Z,
    7. et al.
    A novel chemokine receptor for SDF-1 and I-TAC involved in cell survival, cell adhesion, and tumor development. J Exp Med 2006;203:2201–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Shiozawa Y,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Jung Y,
    6. Pienta KJ,
    7. et al.
    The role of CXCR7/RDC1 as a chemokine receptor for CXCL12/SDF-1 in prostate cancer. J Biol Chem 2008;283:4283–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Xie K
    . Interleukin-8 and human cancer biology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2001;12:375–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Araki S,
    2. Omori Y,
    3. Lyn D,
    4. Singh RK,
    5. Meinbach DM,
    6. Sandman Y,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-8 is a molecular determinant of androgen independence and progression in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:6854–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Singh RK,
    2. Lokeshwar BL
    . Depletion of intrinsic expression of Interleukin-8 in prostate cancer cells causes cell cycle arrest, spontaneous apoptosis and increases the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Mol Cancer 2009;8:57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Nasser MW,
    2. Raghuwanshi SK,
    3. Grant DJ,
    4. Jala VR,
    5. Rajarathnam K,
    6. Richardson RM
    . Differential activation and regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 by CXCL8 monomer and dimer. J Immunol 2009;183:3425–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dandekar DS,
    2. Lokeshwar VB,
    3. Cevallos-Arellano E,
    4. Soloway MS,
    5. Lokeshwar BL
    . An orally active Amazonian plant extract (BIRM) inhibits prostate cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2003;52:59–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tusher VG,
    2. Tibshirani R,
    3. Chu G
    . Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5116–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lokeshwar BL,
    2. Escatel E,
    3. Zhu B
    . Cytotoxic activity and inhibition of tumor cell invasion by derivatives of a chemically modified tetracycline CMT-3 (COL-3). Curr Med Chem 2001;8:271–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lokeshwar BL,
    2. Selzer MG,
    3. Zhu BQ,
    4. Block NL,
    5. Golub LM
    . Inhibition of cell proliferation, invasion, tumor growth and metastasis by an oral non-antimicrobial tetracycline analog (COL-3) in a metastatic prostate cancer model. Int J Cancer 2002;98:297–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Dandekar DS,
    2. Lokeshwar BL
    . Inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression by Tet-inducible COX-2 antisense cDNA in hormone-refractory prostate cancer significantly slows tumor growth and improves efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8037–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Franovic A,
    2. Gunaratnam L,
    3. Smith K,
    4. Robert I,
    5. Patten D,
    6. Lee S
    . Translational up-regulation of the EGFR by tumor hypoxia provides a nonmutational explanation for its overexpression in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:13092–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lokeshwar BL,
    2. Ferrell SM,
    3. Block NL
    . Enhancement of radiation response of prostatic carcinoma by taxol: therapeutic potential for late-stage malignancy. Anticancer Res 1995;15:93–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Shamaladevi N,
    2. Lyn DA,
    3. Escudero DO,
    4. Lokeshwar BL
    . CXC receptor-1 silencing inhibits androgen-independent prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2009;69:8265–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Murphy C,
    2. McGurk M,
    3. Pettigrew J,
    4. Santinelli A,
    5. Mazzucchelli R,
    6. Johnston PG,
    7. et al.
    Nonapical and cytoplasmic expression of interleukin-8, CXCR1, and CXCR2 correlates with cell proliferation and microvessel density in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:4117–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Attal H,
    2. Cohen-Hillel E,
    3. Meshel T,
    4. Wang JM,
    5. Gong W,
    6. Ben-Baruch A
    . Intracellular cross-talk between the GPCR CXCR1 and CXCR2: role of carboxyl terminus phosphorylation sites. Exp Cell Res 2008;314:352–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. White JR,
    2. Lee JM,
    3. Young PR,
    4. Hertzberg RP,
    5. Jurewicz AJ,
    6. Chaikin MA,
    7. et al.
    Identification of a potent, selective non-peptide CXCR2 antagonist that inhibits interleukin-8-induced neutrophil migration. J Biol Chem 1998;273:10095–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sun YX,
    2. Pedersen EA,
    3. Shiozawa Y,
    4. Havens AM,
    5. Jung Y,
    6. Wang J,
    7. et al.
    CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV regulates prostate cancer metastasis by degrading SDF-1/CXCL12. Clin Exp Metastat 2008;25:765–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. Singh R,
    2. Lokeshwar B
    . Depletion of intrinsic expression of interleukin-8 in prostate cancer cells causes cell cycle arrest, spontaneous apoptosis and increases the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs. Mol Cancer 2009;8:57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bhola NE,
    2. Grandis JR
    . Crosstalk between G-protein-coupled receptors and epidermal growth factor receptor in cancer. Front Biosci 2008;13:1857–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Gajadhar A,
    2. Guha A
    . A proximity ligation assay using transiently transfected, epitope-tagged proteins: application for in situ detection of dimerized receptor tyrosine kinases. BioTechniques 2010;48:145–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Berahovich RD,
    2. Penfold ME,
    3. Schall TJ
    . Nonspecific CXCR7 antibodies. Immunol Lett 2010;133:112–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Casilli F,
    2. Bianchini A,
    3. Gloaguen I,
    4. Biordi L,
    5. Alesse E,
    6. Festuccia C,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of interleukin-8 (CXCL8/IL-8) responses by repertaxin, a new inhibitor of the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. Biochem Pharmacol 2005;69:385–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Matityahu E,
    2. Feniger-Barish R,
    3. Meshel T,
    4. Zaslaver A,
    5. Ben-Baruch A
    . Intracellular trafficking of human CXCR1 and CXCR2: regulation by receptor domains and actin-related kinases. Eur J Immunol 2002;32:3525–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Taichman RS,
    2. Cooper C,
    3. Keller ET,
    4. Pienta KJ,
    5. Taichman NS,
    6. McCauley LK
    . Use of the stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 pathway in prostate cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Res 2002;62:1832–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Nelson WG,
    2. De Marzo AM,
    3. DeWeese TL,
    4. Isaacs WB
    . The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. J Urol 2004;172:S6–11; discussion S-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Platz EA,
    2. De Marzo AM
    . Epidemiology of inflammation and prostate cancer. J Urol 2004;171:S36–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Maitland NJ,
    2. Collins AT
    . Inflammation as the primary aetiological agent of human prostate cancer: a stem cell connection? J Cell Biochem 2008;105:931–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Rebbeck TR,
    2. Rennert H,
    3. Walker AH,
    4. Panossian S,
    5. Tran T,
    6. Walker K,
    7. et al.
    Joint effects of inflammation and androgen metabolism on prostate cancer severity. Int J Cancer 2008;123:1385–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Klein EA,
    2. Silverman R
    . Inflammation, infection, and prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:315–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Maxwell PJ,
    2. Gallagher R,
    3. Seaton A,
    4. Wilson C,
    5. Scullin P,
    6. Pettigrew J,
    7. et al.
    HIF-1 and NF-kappaB-mediated upregulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression promotes cell survival in hypoxic prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 2007;26:7333–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Kim SJ,
    2. Uehara H,
    3. Karashima T,
    4. McCarty M,
    5. Shih N,
    6. Fidler IJ
    . Expression of interleukin-8 correlates with angiogenesis, tumorigenicity, and metastasis of human prostate cancer cells implanted orthotopically in nude mice. Neoplasia 2001;3:33–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Caruso DJ,
    2. Carmack AJ,
    3. Lokeshwar VB,
    4. Duncan RC,
    5. Soloway MS,
    6. Lokeshwar BL
    . Osteopontin and interleukin-8 expression is independently associated with prostate cancer recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:4111–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Lehrer S,
    2. Diamond EJ,
    3. Mamkine B,
    4. Stone NN,
    5. Stock RG
    . Serum interleukin-8 is elevated in men with prostate cancer and bone metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3:411.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Venkatakrishnan G,
    2. Salgia R,
    3. Groopman JE
    . Chemokine receptors CXCR-1/2 activate mitogen-activated protein kinase via the epidermal growth factor receptor in ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2000;275:6868–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Rajagopal S,
    2. Rajagopal K,
    3. Lefkowitz RJ
    . Teaching old receptors new tricks: biasing seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9:373–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Cancer Research: 71 (9)
May 2011
Volume 71, Issue 9

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
The IL-8–Regulated Chemokine Receptor CXCR7 Stimulates EGFR Signaling to Promote Prostate Cancer Growth
Rajendra Kumar Singh and Bal L. Lokeshwar
Cancer Res May 1 2011 (71) (9) 3268-3277; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2769
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement