Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Tumor and Stem Cell Biology

CD44s Regulates the TGF-β–Mediated Mesenchymal Phenotype and Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Kosuke Mima, Hirohisa Okabe, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Shigeki Nakagawa, Hideyuki Kuroki, Masayuki Watanabe, Toru Beppu, Mayumi Tamada, Osamu Nagano, Hideyuki Saya and Hideo Baba
Kosuke Mima
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hirohisa Okabe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takatsugu Ishimoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiromitsu Hayashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeki Nakagawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideyuki Kuroki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masayuki Watanabe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toru Beppu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mayumi Tamada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osamu Nagano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideyuki Saya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideo Baba
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0299 Published July 2012
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The prognosis for individuals diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poor because of the high frequency of invasive tumor growth, intrahepatic spread, and extrahepatic metastasis. Here, we investigated the role of the standard isoform of CD44 (CD44s), a major adhesion molecule of the extracellular matrix and a cancer stem cell marker, in the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype of HCC. We found that CD44s was the dominant form of CD44 mRNA expressed in HCC cells. Overexpression of CD44s promoted tumor invasiveness and increased the expression of vimentin, a mesenchymal marker, in HCC cells. Loss of CD44s abrogated these changes. Also in the setting of CD44s overexpression, treatment with TGF-β1 induced the mesenchymal phenotype of HCC cells, which was characterized by low E-cadherin and high vimentin expression. Loss of CD44s inhibited TGF-β–mediated vimentin expression, mesenchymal spindle-like morphology, and tumor invasiveness. Clinically, overexpression of CD44s was associated with low expression of E-cadherin, high expression of vimentin, a high percentage of phospho-Smad2–positive nuclei, and poor prognosis in HCC patients, including reduced disease-free and overall survival. Together, our findings suggest that CD44s plays a critical role in the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype and therefore represents a potential therapeutic target for HCC. Cancer Res; 72(13); 3414–23. ©2012 AACR.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most prevalent and the third most deadly type of cancer worldwide. In fact, it is diagnosed in more than half a million people worldwide each year (1). Surgical resection and liver transplantation are available options for the treatment of early-stage HCC; however, the prognosis of HCC remains poor because of a high level of tumor invasiveness, frequent intrahepatic spread, extrahepatic metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy (2).

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been shown to be a pivotal mechanism contributing to cancer invasion and metastasis including HCC (3–7) because epithelial cells lose their polarity and acquire the migratory properties of mesenchymal cells in the developmental process. In recent metastasis researches, EMT is also shown to play an important role in stem-like properties (8).

CD44, a major adhesion molecule of the extracellular matrix, has been implicated in a wide variety of physiologic processes, including leukocyte homing and activation, wound healing, and cell migration (9, 10). Cells produce CD44 protein isoforms through the process of alternative mRNA splicing. The CD44 standard isoform (CD44s) is expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells and normal epithelial cell subsets, whereas the variant isoform (CD44v) is expressed by some epithelial cells during embryonic development, during lymphocyte maturation and activation, and by several types of carcinoma cells. Recently, cancer stem cells (CSC) in many tumors have been identified by positive expression of CD44, either individually or in combination with other markers, and these cells have been shown to be involved in tumor progression and metastasis (10–16). Although TGF-β signaling is a major regulator of EMT and it maintains the mesenchymal phenotype and stem cell states in an autocrine fashion in cancer (17), the underlying molecular mechanisms that integrate the mesenchymal phenotype with the EMT process and with CSC properties still remain unknown. Therefore, we hypothesize that CD44, a CSC marker, plays an important role in inducing EMT or in maintaining the mesenchymal phenotype in HCC.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines, culture conditions, and reagents

The human HCC lines PLC/PRF/5, HuH1, HLF, and HLE were purchased from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources. SK HEP-1 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. The cells were routinely maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen). The cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 air-humidified atmosphere. Purified recombinant human TGF-β1 (R&D Systems) was reconstituted in sterile 4 mmol/L HCl containing 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (Sigma). TGF-β1 was used at the indicated concentrations in serum-free medium.

Plasmids and siRNA transfection

The cDNA corresponding to human CD44s was introduced into the pcDNA3.1 expression plasmid (Invitrogen; ref. 18). PLC/PRF/5 cells were transfected with the resulting plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). CD44 expression was transiently downregulated using a predesigned siRNA duplex directed against CD44, and a nontargeting siRNA was used as a negative control. The sequences of the siRNA (chimeric RNA–DNA) duplexes (Japan Bioservice) were as follows (18): CD44 siRNA, 5′-AAAUGGUCGCUACAGCAUCTT-3′ and 5′-GAUGCUGUAGCGACCAUUUTT-3′, and control siRNA, 5′-CGUACGCGGAAUACUUCGATT-3′ and 5′-UCGAAGUAUUCCGCGUACGTT-3′. HCC cells were transfected with the annealed siRNA for 24 to 72 hours using Lipofectamine 2000.

Protein extraction and Western blot analysis

Protein extraction from cultivated cells and Western blot analyses were carried out as previously described (19, 20). Briefly, the cells were lysed in cell lysis buffer containing 25 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.4), 100 mmol/L NaCl, and 1% Tween 20. Equal amount of proteins were loaded onto 10% gels and separated using SDS-PAGE. The resolved proteins were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Inc.). The membranes were blocked with 5% low-fat dry milk in TBS-T [25 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.4), 125 mmol/L NaCl, 0.4% Tween 20] for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by incubation with a primary antibody at 4°C overnight. The blots were extensively washed with TBS-T and incubated with an horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody diluted 1:2,000 in TBS-T for 1 hour at room temperature. The membranes were washed and visualized using a Chemiluminescent Detection Reagent Kit (ECL; GE Healthcare Corp.). Primary antibodies for E-cadherin (1:1,000 dilution; BD Transduction Laboratories), vimentin (1:1,000 dilution; Santa Cruz), CD44s (1:1,000 dilution; Bender MedSystems), phospho-Smad2 (1:500 dilution; Cell Signaling), Smad2/3 (1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling), and β-actin (1:1,000 dilution; Cell Signaling) were used for this study.

RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcription PCR

Total RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) were carried out as previously described (19, 20). Total cellular RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was synthesized with the SuperScript III Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers' instructions. qRT-PCR was carried out using a LightCycler 480 II instrument (Roche). To determine the differences in the gene expression levels between specimens, the 2−ΔΔCt method was used to measure the fold changes among the samples (21). To carry out qRT-PCR, primers were designed using the Universal Probe Library (Roche) following the manufacturer's recommendations. The primer sequences and probes used for real-time PCR were as follows: E-cadherin, 5′-TTGACGCCGAGAGCTACAC-3′, 5′-GTCGACCGGTGCAATCTT-3′, and universal probe #80; vimentin, 5′-TACAGGAAGCTGCTGGAAGG-3′, 5′-ACCAGAGGGAGTGAATCCAG-3′, and universal probe #13; CD44, 5′-GCAGTCAACAGTCGAAGAAGG-3′, 5′-TGTCCTCCACAGCTCCATT-3′, and universal probe #29; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5′-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC-3′, 5′-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3′, and universal probe #60; EpCAM, 5′-AGTTGGTGCACAAAATACTGTCAT-3′, 5′-TCCCAAGTTTTGAGCCATTC-3′, and universal probe #8; CD133, 5′-TCCACAGAAATTTACCTACATTGG-3′, 5′-CAGCAGAGAGCAGATGACCA-3′, and universal probe #83; Bmi1, 5′-TTCTTTGACCAGAACAGATTGG-3′, 5′-GCATCACAGTCATTGCTGCT-3′, and universal probe #63; CD13, 5′-TTGCCTACCAGAACACCATCT-3′, 5′-GTTGGATGGACCGGTTGTT-3′, and universal probe #75; and CD90, 5′-CAGAACGTCACAGTGCTCAGA-3′, 5′-GAGGAGGGAGAGGGAGAGC-3′, and universal probe #66. To analyze the CD44 splice variants in human HCC cell lines, the following human primer sets (forward and reverse, respectively) were used: CD44, 5′-TCCCAGACGAAGACAGTCCCTGGAT-3′ and 5′-CACTGGGGTGGAATGTGTCTTGGTC-3′, and GAPDH, 5′-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACAC-3′ and 5′-GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC-3′.

Invasion assay

An in vitro cell invasion assay was done as previously described (20). Briefly, the invasion rate of tumor cells that migrated through transwell inserts (8-μm pore size) with a uniform layer of BD Matrigel basement membrane matrix (BD Biosciences) was assessed according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The cells were seeded (5 × 104) in 500 μL of serum-free medium into the upper chamber of the insert, and medium containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 22 hours, the noninvading cells were removed with a cotton swab, and the invading cells were stained with 1% toluidine blue and counted under a microscope.

Patients and treatment

Among the 235 consecutive patients who had undergone curative hepatic resection between 2004 and 2007 in the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 150 primary HCC samples were analyzed in this study. None of the patients received any preoperative anticancer treatment. The pathologic diagnoses and the clinicopathologic factors were established based on the general guideline for primary liver cancer as defined by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (22, 23) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system (24). The median follow-up duration after surgery was 44 months. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of the Graduate School of Medicine, Kumamoto University (Kumamoto, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry and scoring

The sample processing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) procedures were carried out as described in a previous report (20). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using 3% hydrogen peroxide, and the sections were incubated with diluted antibodies. A subsequent reaction was carried out with a biotin-free HRP enzyme–labeled polymer from the Envision Plus detection system (Dako Co.). Phospho-Smad2 antibody binding was detected using the Vectastain ABC Elite avidin/biotin/peroxidase kit (Vector Laboratories Inc.). A positive reaction was visualized with the addition of diaminobenzidine solution, which was followed by counterstaining with Mayer's hematoxylin. Primary antibodies for E-cadherin (1:100 dilution; BD), vimentin (1:50 dilution; Santa Cruz), CD44s (1:300 dilution; Bender MedSystems), and phospho-Smad2 (1:100 dilution; Cell Signaling) were used for this study. All of the immunohistochemical staining results were independently scored by 2 pathologists. The membranous E-cadherin, cytoplasmic vimentin, and membranous CD44s expressions were interpreted according to the guidelines published in previous studies (5, 25, 26). For membranous E-cadherin, cytoplasmic vimentin, membranous CD44s, and phospho-Smad2-positive nuclei, we graded the results into categories from 0 to 3+ as follows: 0, no staining; 1+, 1% to 25% staining; 2+, 26% to 50% staining; 3+, >50% of the specimen was stained. For membranous E-cadherin, the 2+ and 3+ samples were defined as positive immunohistochemical results. For cytoplasmic vimentin, membranous CD44s, and phospho-Smad2-positive nuclei, the 3+ specimens were defined as positive immunohistochemical results.

Statistical analyses

All of the experiments were carried out in triplicate, and the data shown are representative of the results. The data are presented as the means ± SD. Independent Student t tests were used to compare the continuous variables between the 2 groups, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were carried out as indicated with a statistical analysis software program (Excel Statistics, Social Survey Research Information Co.). Differences were considered to be significant if P < 0.05.

Results

CD44 standard isoform expression is associated with a mesenchymal phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

We examined the expression of CD44 and its association with EMT markers (E-cadherin and vimentin) in 5 HCC cell lines (PLC/PRF/5, HuH1, HLF, HLE, and SK HEP-1). At the mRNA level, the high CD44 expressing cell lines HLF, HLE, and SK HEP-1 showed high expression levels of vimentin, whereas the low CD44 expressing cell lines PLC/PRF/5 and HuH1 showed high expression levels of E-cadherin, as determined by real-time PCR (Fig. 1A). Recently, we showed that the CD44 isoform expressed in the tumor cells of Gan mice, as well as in human gastrointestinal cell lines, consists mostly of variant isoforms (CD44v8-10) containing amino acids derived from exons 8 to 10 (18, 27). To determine the predominant isoform of CD44 expressed in the HCC cell lines, we examined the expression levels of the different isoforms using RT-PCR according to the same method. Unlike in human colon cancer cell lines, our RT-PCR analysis revealed that CD44s mRNA, rather than CD44v8-10mRNA, was the dominant form present in the human HCC cell lines HLF, HLE, and SK HEP-1 (Fig. 1B). We confirmed the associations of CD44s with E-cadherin and vimentin expression at the protein level (Fig. 1C). These results suggested that high levels of CD44s expression are related to a mesenchymal phenotype, which includes downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of vimentin, in HCC cells. We also examined the expression of other CSC markers that were previously reported in HCC (12, 28–31) and compared them with the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin. However, no correlations were observed that were similar to that of CD44 and vimentin. In addition, the expression levels of EpCAM, CD133, and CD13 seemed to be similar to the expression level of E-cadherin (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

CD44s expression is associated with a mesenchymal phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. A, the relative expression levels of CD44, E-cadherin, and vimentin mRNA in 5 HCC cell lines are shown. The data represent the means ± SD (n = 3). B, RT-PCR analysis of CD44 mRNA in 5 HCC cell lines. Total RNA isolated from the 5 HCC cell lines was subjected to RT-PCR analysis with primers targeted to exons 5 and 16 of human CD44 cDNA and to human GAPDH cDNA. The positions of PCR products derived from CD44v8-10 (479 bp) or CD44s (83 bp) cDNAs are indicated. HT29 and HCT116 cell lines (colon cancer cell lines) were used as positive controls. C, the expression levels of CD44, E-cadherin, and vimentin protein in the 5 HCC cell lines, as determined by Western blot analysis.

Overexpression of CD44s promotes the expression of vimentin and tumor invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma cells, whereas the knockdown of CD44s attenuates these changes

To investigate whether CD44s regulates the mesenchymal phenotype of HCC cells, we transiently transfected PLC/PRF/5 cells with a human CD44s expression vector. The overexpression of CD44s increased the expression of vimentin but did not decrease the expression of E-cadherin (Fig. 2A and B). Furthermore, the overexpression of CD44s increased the in vitro invasion of the transfected cells by 7-fold (Fig. 2C). Next, we examined the effect of the siRNA knockdown of CD44 in HLF cells, which normally have high CD44 expression, to determine whether CD44s is essential for the expression of vimentin in HCC cells. CD44 siRNA attenuated the expression of vimentin at the mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2D and E). Furthermore, in HLF cells pretreated with CD44 siRNA, the addition of a CD44s expression vector reversibly increased the expression of vimentin (Fig. 2E). The results from an in vitro invasion assay revealed that HLF cells transfected with CD44 siRNA exhibited a decrease in invasion compared with cells transfected with a control siRNA (Fig. 2F). We observed similar results in high CD44s expressing HLE and SK HEP-1 cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). Overexpression of CD44s in PLC/PRF/5 cells did not decrease the expression of E-cadherin. Moreover, we could not detect the upregulation of E-cadherin in the CD44 knockdown cells. These results suggested that CD44s regulates the expression of vimentin and tumor cell invasion in HCC cells.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Overexpression of CD44s promotes the expression of vimentin and tumor invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma cells whereas the knockdown of CD44s attenuates these changes. A, the relative expression levels of E-cadherin and vimentin mRNA in PLC/PRF/5 cells overexpressing CD44s compared with control cells. The data represent the means ± SD (n = 3; ***, P < 0.001). B, the expression levels of CD44s, E-cadherin, and vimentin proteins in PLC/PRF/5 cells overexpressing CD44s compared with control cells. C, the invasive capacity of PLC/PRF/5 cells overexpressing CD44s compared with control cells. The data represent the means ± SD (n = 3; *, P < 0.05). D, the relative expression levels of vimentin mRNA in HLF cells transfected with siRNA targeted against CD44 compared with control cells. The data represent the means ± SD (n = 3; ***, P < 0.001). E, the expression levels of CD44s and vimentin protein in HLF cells transfected with siRNA targeted against CD44 or transfected with both siRNA targeted against CD44 and an hCD44s expression vector compared with control cells. F, the invasive capacity of HLF cells transfected with siRNA targeted against CD44 compared with control cells. The data represent the means ± SD (n = 3; *, P < 0.05).

CD44s is induced by TGF-β and regulates the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

TGF-β signaling is central to tumorigenesis and tumor progression because it regulates many critical cellular processes, including cell proliferation, EMT, and stem cell maintenance (32). HLF and HLE cells express detectable levels of phosphorylated Smad2, and the expression of E-cadherin was increased after incubation with a TGFβ type I receptor kinase inhibitor in HLF and HLE cells, suggesting that TGF-β signaling plays a crucial role in EMT in HCC cells (33). TGF-β1 is overexpressed in tumor cells, and this overexpression correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with HCC (34, 35). Thus, we investigated the role of CD44 in TGF-β signaling. We screened the activation status of TGF-β signaling by measuring phosphorylated Smad2 (phospho-Smad2) expression in the 5 HCC cell lines. As reported previously, HLF and HLE cells expressed detectable levels of phosphorylated Smad2 whereas SK HEP-1 cells did not (Fig. 3A). The precise mechanism of CD44 expression in SK HEP-1 cells with low phospho-Smad2 expression is unclear from our study. SK HEP-1 cells are originally derived from endothelial cells, which express CD44 (36, 37). In human endothelial cells, other growth factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor, VEGF, and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), can induce the expression of CD44 (37, 38). Therefore, an alternative mechanism may be associated with the expression of CD44 in SK HEP-1 cells. We next examined the role of CD44 in the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype of HCC cells. Treatment with TGF-β1 induced a mesenchymal spindle-like morphology in PLC/PRF/5 cells (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Following treatment with TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL), phospho-Smad2 expression in PLC/PRF/5 cells progressively increased in a time-dependent manner and peaked after 60 minutes (Fig. 3B). The downregulation of E-cadherin, the upregulation of vimentin, and the expression of CD44s were induced after 24 hours of treatment with TGF-β1 in PLC/PRF/5 cells (Fig. 3B). The expression of E-cadherin mRNA was decreased after 6 hours and restored after 24 hours (Supplementary Fig. S3B). The expression of vimentin and CD44 mRNA were elevated after 24 hours. Several transcription factors, including Snail, Slug, and Twist1 promote EMT in epithelial cells (4). The expression of Snail mRNA was increased after treatment with TGF-β1 and peaked after 3 hours (Supplementary Fig. S3C). The expression of Slug was not affected, and no expression of Twist1 in response to TGF-β1 was detected in PLC/PRF/5 cells. These results suggested that TGF-β signaling triggered the mesenchymal phenotype and induced the expression of CD44s in HCC cells. Next, we examined the effects of CD44s on the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype. HLF cells also displayed progressively increased phospho-Smad2 levels in a time-dependent manner following incubation with TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL), and the levels peaked after 60 minutes (Supplementary Fig. S3D). In addition, upregulation of vimentin was induced by TGF-β1 after 24 hours of treatment in HLF cells (Fig. 3C). These results indicated that TGF-β signaling enhances the expression of vimentin in HLF cells. CD44 siRNA inhibited the TGF-β–mediated vimentin expression, mesenchymal spindle-like morphology, and tumor invasiveness in HLF cells (Fig. 3D–F). These results suggested that CD44s is essential for the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype in HCC cells.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

CD44s is induced by TGF-β1 and regulates the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. A, the expression of phosphorylated Smad2 (phospho-Smad2) in the 5 HCC cell lines, as determined by Western blot analysis. B, immunoblot analysis of phospho-Smad2 and the expression levels of CD44s, E-cadherin, and vimentin following TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) treatment in PLC/PRF/5 cells. C, immunoblot analysis of phospho-Smad2 and the expression level of vimentin following TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) treatment in HLF cells. D, immunoblot analysis of the expression levels of CD44s and vimentin with or without TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) treatment for 24 hours in HLF cells transfected with siRNA targeted against CD44 compared with control cells. E, phase-contrast images with or without TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) treatment for 24 hours in the HLF cells transfected with siRNA targeted against CD44 compared with control cells. Scale bars, 200 μm. F, the invasive capacity of HLF cells with or without TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) treatment for 24 hours after transfection with siRNA targeted against CD44 compared with untreated control cells. The data represent the means ± SD (n = 3; **, P < 0.01).

CD44s expression is associated with E-cadherin and vimentin expression and poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

To confirm the in vitro finding that the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype and induction of CD44s are correlated in HCC cells, we analyzed the expression levels of CD44s, E-cadherin, vimentin, and phospho-Smad2 by IHC in 150 HCC patient samples. High expression of CD44s (e.g., case 2 shown in Fig. 4A) was detected in 25% (37 of 150) of the samples, and low E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with high vimentin expression (P = 0.004). High CD44s expression was significantly associated with low E-cadherin expression (P = 0.039), high vimentin expression (P < 0.001), and high phospho-Smad2 nuclear positivity (P < 0.001; Table 1). These data suggested that the activation of TGF-β signaling induces CD44s expression and a mesenchymal phenotype in patients with HCC. With regard to clinicopathologic factors, a significant correlation was shown between high CD44s expression and large tumor size (P = 0.003), multiple tumors (P = 0.032), and poor tumor differentiation (P = 0.020; Table 2). We further investigated the association between the expression levels of CD44s, vimentin, and E-cadherin and the clinicopathologic factors in HCC patients. In a subgroup of patients with a CD44shigh/vimentinhigh/E-cadherinlow expression profile, the incidence of vascular invasion was significantly higher than that in a subgroup of patients with a CD44slow/vimentinlow/E-cadherinhigh expression profile (25% vs. 0%, respectively, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table S1). In all 150 HCC patients studied, high CD44s expression was more associated with frequent vascular invasion than low CD44s expression was, but this correlation did not reach a statistically significant difference (19% vs. 10%, P = 0.136). These results suggested that not only the mesenchymal phenotype via CD44s but also the loss of E-cadherin expression plays an important role of the vascular invasion in HCC patients. Notably, high CD44s expression was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.023; Fig. 4B) and shorter overall survival (P = 0.013; Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

CD44s expression is associated with E-cadherin and vimentin expression and poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A, immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin, vimentin, CD44s, and phospho-Smad2 in representative cases with low CD44s expression (case 1) and high CD44s expression (case 2). Scale bars, 50 μm. B, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of disease-free survival in 150 HCC patients comparing the high CD44s expression group and the low CD44s expression group using the log-rank test. C, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of overall survival in 150 HCC patients comparing the high CD44s expression group and the low CD44s expression group using the log-rank test. D, model of the regulation of the mesenchymal phenotype by CD44s in hepatocellular carcinoma cells following the induction of CD44s expression by TGF-β signaling. Subsequently, CD44s promotes vimentin expression and tumor cell invasion. The expression of E-cadherin may be suppressed by other mechanisms in the TGF-β signaling pathway.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Correlation between CD44s expression and E-cadherin/vimentin/phospho-Smad2 expression in 150 HCC patients

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Correlation between CD44s expression and the clinicopathologic factors of 150 HCC patients

Discussion

In this study, CD44s, but not the variant isoforms, regulates the mesenchymal phenotype in HCC cells. In patients with HCC, tumoral CD44s overexpression was associated with the mesenchymal phenotype, as characterized by low E-cadherin expression and high vimentin expression. Interestingly, CD44s mRNA was the dominant form of CD44 mRNA present in human HCC cell lines, whereas the presence of high levels of the CD44v have been proposed as an important metastatic tumor marker in a number of cancers such as colon and lung cancer (39, 40). In breast cancer, CD44s was essential for the response to TGF-β during EMT, and the gain of CD44s expression was accompanied by a loss of expression of the variant isoforms (41). These findings suggest that the dominant form of CD44 isoforms in different tumors varies according to the location of the cancer cells.

TGF-β primes cancer cells for pulmonary metastasis and metastatic colonization of cancer cells in bones (42, 43). A recent study showed that TGF-β in the blood activates TGF-β signaling in cancer cells, resulting in their transition to an invasive mesenchymal-like phenotype with enhanced metastatic potential (44). Furthermore, a link between TGF-β and the CD44high population has been described in breast cancer and glioblastoma. TGF-β increases the CD44high/CD24low population, which is enriched in CSCs, through the induction of EMT in breast cancer (8). In addition, glioma-initiating cells (GIC) expressed high levels of CD44, and the inhibition of TGF-β signaling decreased the GIC population in glioblastomas (45). These results agree with our studies showing a novel role for CD44s in the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype in HCC cells.

Although TGF-β signaling can induce the mesenchymal phenotype as characterized by low E-cadherin expression and high vimentin expression in epithelial cells, the mediators between TGF-β signaling and the mesenchymal phenotype are still unclear. This study suggests that CD44 plays a downstream role in TGF-β signaling by regulating the expression of vimentin and tumor cell invasiveness, and that CD44 does not affect the expression of E-cadherin, which may be suppressed by other mechanisms involved in the TGF-β pathway (Fig. 4D). The expression of Snail was elevated after 3 hours, and the expression of E-cadherin was suppressed after 6 hours. The induction of Snail expression in response to TGF-β is mediated by Smad2/3. Smad3 binds to the Snail promoter and activates its transcription (46). Smad3/4 and Snail interact to form a transcriptional repressor complex, which targets the promoter of E-cadherin (47). The time course of the activation of TGF-β signaling and the expression of Snail and E-cadherin in this study suggested that TGF-β signaling may suppress the expression of E-cadherin via Snail in HCC cells.

We showed that high CD44s expression was a poor prognostic factor following curative hepatic resection of primary HCC. In addition to CD44s, several other variant isoforms (CD44v5, CD44v6, CD44v7-8, and CD44v10) correlate with a worse prognosis in HCC patients, as determined by immunohistochemical analysis (26). Our investigations about clinicopathologic factors showed a significant correlation between CD44s expression and large tumor size, multiple tumors, and poor tumor differentiation in patients with HCC. Consistent with our in vitro analysis, high CD44s expression correlated with high vimentin expression in human HCC cells. Furthermore, in patients with HCC, we showed that phospho-Smad2 nuclear positivity was associated with high CD44s expression and that a CD44shigh/vimentinhigh/E-cadherinlow expression profile was associated with vascular invasion. Together with our in vitro studies, these results suggested that the TGF-β–CD44s axis plays an important role in the vascular invasion of HCC. TGF-β signaling was recently determined to maintain the stem cell–like properties of tumor-initiating cells (32). Chaffer and Weinberg suggested a new concept of cancer cell metastasis in which cancer cells traveling through the circulation system are considered to be CSCs because of their anchorage-independent survival and the fact that these CSCs extravasate and invade into the parenchyma at distant organs (48). These observations support our findings that CD44s, a CSC marker, plays a downstream role in TGF-β signaling in HCC cells. We are continuing our studies to examine whether CD44s has an important role in the modulation of CSC properties in HCC cells.

In conclusion, our study suggests that the standard isoform of CD44, a CSC marker, regulates the TGF-β–mediated mesenchymal phenotype, and that its expression indicates poor prognosis in patients with HCC. This information will be valuable for a better understanding of the relationship between CSCs and the mesenchymal phenotype induced by EMT; in addition, our results establish CD44s as a novel therapeutic target for HCC.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: K. Mima, H. Okabe, T. Ishimoto

Development of methodology: K. Mima, H. Okabe, H. Baba

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): H. Okabe, S. Nakagawa, H. Kuroki, O. Nagano, H. Baba

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): K. Mima, H. Okabe, H. Hayashi, H. Kuroki, M. Watanabe, H. Baba

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: K. Mima, H. Okabe, H. Hayashi, T. Beppu, H. Baba

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): H. Okabe, S. Nakagawa, M. Tamada

Study supervision: K. Mima, H. Okabe, M. Watanabe, H. Saya

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Keisuke Miyake and Naoko Yokoyama for their valuable technical assistance and also Eri Takahashi for her useful suggestions.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received January 30, 2012.
  • Revision received April 7, 2012.
  • Accepted April 25, 2012.
  • ©2012 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. El-Serag HB
    . Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1118–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Poon RT,
    2. Ng IO,
    3. Fan ST,
    4. Lai EC,
    5. Lo CM,
    6. Liu CL,
    7. et al.
    Clinicopathologic features of long-term survivors and disease-free survivors after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of a prospective cohort. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3037–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Polyak K,
    2. Weinberg RA
    . Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:265–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Thiery JP,
    2. Acloque H,
    3. Huang RY,
    4. Nieto MA
    . Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 2009;139:871–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Yang MH,
    2. Chen CL,
    3. Chau GY,
    4. Chiou SH,
    5. Su CW,
    6. Chou TY,
    7. et al.
    Comprehensive analysis of the independent effect of twist and snail in promoting metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2009;50:1464–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Lee TK,
    2. Poon RT,
    3. Yuen AP,
    4. Ling MT,
    5. Kwok WK,
    6. Wang XH,
    7. et al.
    Twist overexpression correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:5369–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Chan TH,
    3. Yuan YF,
    4. Hu L,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Ma S,
    7. et al.
    CHD1L promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression and metastasis in mice and is associated with these processes in human patients. J Clin Invest 2010;120:1178–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mani SA,
    2. Guo W,
    3. Liao MJ,
    4. Eaton EN,
    5. Ayyanan A,
    6. Zhou AY,
    7. et al.
    The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 2008;133:704–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ponta H,
    2. Sherman L,
    3. Herrlich PA
    . CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:33–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Zoller M
    . CD44: can a cancer-initiating cell profit from an abundantly expressed molecule? Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:254–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Clevers H
    . The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med 2011;17:313–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yang ZF,
    2. Ho DW,
    3. Ng MN,
    4. Lau CK,
    5. Yu WC,
    6. Ngai P,
    7. et al.
    Significance of CD90 +cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell 2008;13:153–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Al-Hajj M,
    2. Wicha MS,
    3. Benito-Hernandez A,
    4. Morrison SJ,
    5. Clarke MF
    . Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:3983–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Dalerba P,
    2. Dylla SJ,
    3. Park IK,
    4. Liu R,
    5. Wang X,
    6. Cho RW,
    7. et al.
    Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:10158–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Prince ME,
    2. Sivanandan R,
    3. Kaczorowski A,
    4. Wolf GT,
    5. Kaplan MJ,
    6. Dalerba P,
    7. et al.
    Identification of a subpopulation of cells with cancer stem cell properties in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:973–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Heidt DG,
    3. Dalerba P,
    4. Burant CF,
    5. Zhang L,
    6. Adsay V,
    7. et al.
    Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 2007;67:1030–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Scheel C,
    2. Eaton EN,
    3. Li SH,
    4. Chaffer CL,
    5. Reinhardt F,
    6. Kah KJ,
    7. et al.
    Paracrine and autocrine signals induce and maintain mesenchymal and stem cell states in the breast. Cell 2011;145:926–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ishimoto T,
    2. Nagano O,
    3. Yae T,
    4. Tamada M,
    5. Motohara T,
    6. Oshima H,
    7. et al.
    CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc(-) and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell 2011;19:387–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hiyoshi Y,
    2. Kamohara H,
    3. Karashima R,
    4. Sato N,
    5. Imamura Y,
    6. Nagai Y,
    7. et al.
    MicroRNA-21 regulates the proliferation and invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:1915–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Okabe H,
    2. Beppu T,
    3. Hayashi H,
    4. Ishiko T,
    5. Masuda T,
    6. Otao R,
    7. et al.
    Hepatic stellate cells accelerate the malignant behavior of cholangiocarcinoma cells. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:1175–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Livak KJ,
    2. Schmittgen TD
    . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001;25:402–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Japan LCSGJ. The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 5th ed., revised version. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2009.
  23. 23.↵
    1. Minagawa M,
    2. Ikai I,
    3. Matsuyama Y,
    4. Yamaoka Y,
    5. Makuuchi M
    . Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:909–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Vauthey JN,
    2. Lauwers GY,
    3. Esnaola NF,
    4. Do KA,
    5. Belghiti J,
    6. Mirza N,
    7. et al.
    Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1527–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yang MH,
    2. Hsu DS,
    3. Wang HW,
    4. Wang HJ,
    5. Lan HY,
    6. Yang WH,
    7. et al.
    Bmi1 is essential in Twist1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol 2010;12:982–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Endo K,
    2. Terada T
    . Protein expression of CD44 (standard and variant isoforms) in hepatocellular carcinoma: relationships with tumor grade, clinicopathologic parameters, p53 expression, and patient survival. J Hepatol 2000;32:78–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Ishimoto T,
    2. Oshima H,
    3. Oshima M,
    4. Kai K,
    5. Torii R,
    6. Masuko T,
    7. et al.
    CD44+ slow-cycling tumor cell expansion is triggered by cooperative actions of Wnt and prostaglandin E2 in gastric tumorigenesis. Cancer Sci 2010;101:673–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Chiba T,
    2. Miyagi S,
    3. Saraya A,
    4. Aoki R,
    5. Seki A,
    6. Morita Y,
    7. et al.
    The polycomb gene product BMI1 contributes to the maintenance of tumor-initiating side population cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 2008;68:7742–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Yamashita T,
    2. Ji J,
    3. Budhu A,
    4. Forgues M,
    5. Yang W,
    6. Wang HY,
    7. et al.
    EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells are tumor-initiating cells with stem/progenitor cell features. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1012–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ma S,
    2. Chan KW,
    3. Hu L,
    4. Lee TK,
    5. Wo JY,
    6. Ng IO,
    7. et al.
    Identification and characterization of tumorigenic liver cancer stem/progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2542–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Haraguchi N,
    2. Ishii H,
    3. Mimori K,
    4. Tanaka F,
    5. Ohkuma M,
    6. Kim HM,
    7. et al.
    CD13 is a therapeutic target in human liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Invest 2010;120:3326–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ikushima H,
    2. Miyazono K
    . TGFbeta signalling: a complex web in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:415–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Fransvea E,
    2. Angelotti U,
    3. Antonaci S,
    4. Giannelli G
    . Blocking transforming growth factor-beta up-regulates E-cadherin and reduces migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology 2008;47:1557–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Bedossa P,
    2. Peltier E,
    3. Terris B,
    4. Franco D,
    5. Poynard T
    . Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) and TGF-beta 1 receptors in normal, cirrhotic, and neoplastic human livers. Hepatology 1995;21:760–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Abou-Shady M,
    2. Baer HU,
    3. Friess H,
    4. Berberat P,
    5. Zimmermann A,
    6. Graber H,
    7. et al.
    Transforming growth factor betas and their signaling receptors in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg 1999;177:209–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Heffelfinger SC,
    2. Hawkins HH,
    3. Barrish J,
    4. Taylor L,
    5. Darlington GJ
    . SK HEP-1: a human cell line of endothelial origin. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1992;28A:136–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Griffioen AW,
    2. Coenen MJ,
    3. Damen CA,
    4. Hellwig SM,
    5. van Weering DH,
    6. Vooys W,
    7. et al.
    CD44 is involved in tumor angiogenesis; an activation antigen on human endothelial cells. Blood 1997;90:1150–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hiscox S,
    2. Jiang WG
    . Regulation of endothelial CD44 expression and endothelium-tumour cell interactions by hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997;233:1–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Kuniyasu H,
    2. Oue N,
    3. Tsutsumi M,
    4. Tahara E,
    5. Yasui W
    . Heparan sulfate enhances invasion by human colon carcinoma cell lines through expression of CD44 variant exon 3. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:4067–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Miyoshi T,
    2. Kondo K,
    3. Hino N,
    4. Uyama T,
    5. Monden Y
    . The expression of the CD44 variant exon 6 is associated with lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1997;3:1289–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  41. 41.↵
    1. Brown RL,
    2. Reinke LM,
    3. Damerow MS,
    4. Perez D,
    5. Chodosh LA,
    6. Yang J,
    7. et al.
    CD44 splice isoform switching in human and mouse epithelium is essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest 2011;121:1064–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Padua D,
    2. Zhang XH,
    3. Wang Q,
    4. Nadal C,
    5. Gerald WL,
    6. Gomis RR,
    7. et al.
    TGFbeta primes breast tumors for lung metastasis seeding through angiopoietin-like 4. Cell 2008;133:66–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Yin JJ,
    2. Selander K,
    3. Chirgwin JM,
    4. Dallas M,
    5. Grubbs BG,
    6. Wieser R,
    7. et al.
    TGF-beta signaling blockade inhibits PTHrP secretion by breast cancer cells and bone metastases development. J Clin Invest 1999;103:197–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Labelle M,
    2. Begum S,
    3. Hynes RO
    . Direct signaling between platelets and cancer cells induces an epithelial-mesenchymal-like transition and promotes metastasis. Cancer Cell 2011;20:576–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Anido J,
    2. Saez-Borderias A,
    3. Gonzalez-Junca A,
    4. Rodon L,
    5. Folch G,
    6. Carmona MA,
    7. et al.
    TGF-beta receptor inhibitors target the CD44(high)/Id1(high) glioma-initiating cell population in human glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2010;18:655–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Hoot KE,
    2. Lighthall J,
    3. Han G,
    4. Lu SL,
    5. Li A,
    6. Ju W,
    7. et al.
    Keratinocyte-specific Smad2 ablation results in increased epithelial-mesenchymal transition during skin cancer formation and progression. J Clin Invest 2008;118:2722–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Vincent T,
    2. Neve EP,
    3. Johnson JR,
    4. Kukalev A,
    5. Rojo F,
    6. Albanell J,
    7. et al.
    A SNAIL1-SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-beta mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:943–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Chaffer CL,
    2. Weinberg RA
    . A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011;331:1559–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 72 (13)
July 2012
Volume 72, Issue 13
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CD44s Regulates the TGF-β–Mediated Mesenchymal Phenotype and Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CD44s Regulates the TGF-β–Mediated Mesenchymal Phenotype and Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Kosuke Mima, Hirohisa Okabe, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Shigeki Nakagawa, Hideyuki Kuroki, Masayuki Watanabe, Toru Beppu, Mayumi Tamada, Osamu Nagano, Hideyuki Saya and Hideo Baba
Cancer Res July 1 2012 (72) (13) 3414-3423; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0299

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CD44s Regulates the TGF-β–Mediated Mesenchymal Phenotype and Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Kosuke Mima, Hirohisa Okabe, Takatsugu Ishimoto, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Shigeki Nakagawa, Hideyuki Kuroki, Masayuki Watanabe, Toru Beppu, Mayumi Tamada, Osamu Nagano, Hideyuki Saya and Hideo Baba
Cancer Res July 1 2012 (72) (13) 3414-3423; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0299
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • mtDNA-Oncogene Cross-Talk
  • Alternative NFκB Regulates ALDH+ Ovarian Cancer Cells
  • R-Spondin1/LGR5 Activates TGFβ in Colon Cancer Metastasis
Show more Tumor and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement