Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Meeting Report

Challenges and Key Considerations of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect for Nanomedicine Drug Delivery in Oncology

Uma Prabhakar, Hiroshi Maeda, Rakesh K. Jain, Eva M. Sevick-Muraca, William Zamboni, Omid C. Farokhzad, Simon T. Barry, Alberto Gabizon, Piotr Grodzinski and David C. Blakey
Uma Prabhakar
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Maeda
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh K. Jain
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eva M. Sevick-Muraca
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William Zamboni
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Omid C. Farokhzad
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon T. Barry
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Gabizon
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Piotr Grodzinski
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Blakey
1Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; 2Institute for DDS Research, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 3Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital; 4Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 5Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas; 6UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; and 8Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University-School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4561 Published April 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    Factors affecting the EPR effect of macromolecular drugs in solid tumors (modified after references 4 and 5)

    MediatorsResponsible enzymes and mechanismsPossible application to therapeutic modality and mechanism
    BradykininKallikrein/proteaseACE inhibitors (e.g., enalapril); blocking of kinin degradation elevates local kinin level → more EPR.
    NOiNOSNO-releasing agents (e.g., nitroglycerin, ISDN, etc.) via denitrase and nitrite reductase to generate NO.
    VPF/VEGFInvolved in NO generation
    ProstaglandinsCOX-1Beraprost sodium: PGI2 agonist works via vascular dilatation and extravasation (5).
    Collagenase (MMP)Activated from proMMPs by peroxynitrite, or proteases
    PeroxynitriteNO + O2
    Carbon monoxide (CO)Heme oxygenase (HO)-1PEG-hemine via induction of HO-1 in tumor → CO generation (15).
    Induced hypertensionUsing angiotensin IISlow i.v. infusion → systemic hypertension, vascular extravasation selectively in tumor tissue.
    Inflammatory cells and H2O2Neutrophil/NADPH oxidase, etc.
    TGF-β inhibitorInducing multiple inflammatory cytokines; NOS, COX, etc.: NO, PGs, etc.
    TNF-αInducing multiple inflammatory cytokines; NOS, COX, etc.: NO, PGs, etc.
    Anticancer agents
    HeatVascular dilationGold nanoparticle or ferrite nanoparticle using electromagnetic, or laser, or microwave.
  • Table 2.

    Survival benefits from the FDA-approved nanomedicines to date

    Generic drugTrade name(s)IndicationBenefit
    PEGylated liposomal doxorubicinDoxil and CaelyxHIV-related Kaposi's sarcomaNo statistically significant change in overall survival (23 wks) vs. doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine treatment (22.3 wks) for HIV-related Kaposi's sarcoma
    Metastatic ovarian cancerStatistically significant overall survival improvement (108 wks, P = 0.008) vs. topotecan treatment (71.1 wks) for platinum-sensitive patients with ovarian cancer
    Metastatic breast cancerNo statistically significant overall survival change (84 wks) vs. conventional doxorubicin (88 wks) for patients with breast cancer receiving first-line therapy
    Liposomal daunorubicinDaunoXomeHIV-related Kaposi's sarcomaNo statistically significant overall survival change (52.7 wks) vs. doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine treatment (48.9 wks)
    Poly (styren-co-maleic acid)–conjugated naocarzinostatinSMANCSLiver cancer, renal cancerApproved in 1993 in Japan. Far more effective when the EPR is enhanced by increasing the blood pressure in difficult-to-treat tumors, including metastatic liver cancer, cancers of pancreas, gall bladder, etc.
    Liver cancer: 5-year survival (%)**
    Metastasis1 seg.+>2 seg.
    Child A>90%∼>50%
    Child B40%30%
    Five-year survival (%) based on the liver function (cirrhosis) by child classification and intrahepatic+ metastasis within one segment or more
    Albumin-bound paclitaxelAbraxaneMetastatic breast cancerStatistically significant overall survival change (56.4 wks, P = 0.024) vs. polyethoxylated castor oil–based paclitaxel treatment (46.7 wks) for patients receiving second-line treatment

    NOTE: The polymeric platform methoxy PEG-poly(d,l-lactide) taxol with the trade name Genexol-PM (Sanayang Co.) has been approved in Korea for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Adapted from the work of Jain and Stylianopoulos (16).

    **, SMANCS data in the table were provided by H. Maeda.

    Additional Files

    • Tables
    • Supplementary Data

      Files in this Data Supplement:

      • List of Speakers - PDF file - 76K
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Cancer Research: 73 (8)
    April 2013
    Volume 73, Issue 8
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover

    Sign up for alerts

    View this article with LENS

    Open full page PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

    NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Challenges and Key Considerations of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect for Nanomedicine Drug Delivery in Oncology
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
    (Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Challenges and Key Considerations of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect for Nanomedicine Drug Delivery in Oncology
    Uma Prabhakar, Hiroshi Maeda, Rakesh K. Jain, Eva M. Sevick-Muraca, William Zamboni, Omid C. Farokhzad, Simon T. Barry, Alberto Gabizon, Piotr Grodzinski and David C. Blakey
    Cancer Res April 15 2013 (73) (8) 2412-2417; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4561

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    Challenges and Key Considerations of the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect for Nanomedicine Drug Delivery in Oncology
    Uma Prabhakar, Hiroshi Maeda, Rakesh K. Jain, Eva M. Sevick-Muraca, William Zamboni, Omid C. Farokhzad, Simon T. Barry, Alberto Gabizon, Piotr Grodzinski and David C. Blakey
    Cancer Res April 15 2013 (73) (8) 2412-2417; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4561
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Introduction
      • Report
      • Heterogeneity of EPR in Tumors
      • Factors Influencing EPR
      • Prospects
      • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
      • Authors' Contributions
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Data
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Advertisement

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Medical Imaging Included in the Cancer Knowledge Network
    • Advances of Targeting Cancer Stem Cells
    • Priorities in Advancing Metastatic Breast Cancer Research
    Show more Meeting Report
    • Home
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

    Articles

    • Online First
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts

    Info for

    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Librarians

    About Cancer Research

    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Permissions
    • Submit a Manuscript
    AACR logo

    Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

    Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
    Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
    Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
    American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

    Advertisement