Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Tumor and Stem Cell Biology

Epigenetic States of Cells of Origin and Tumor Evolution Drive Tumor-Initiating Cell Phenotype and Tumor Heterogeneity

Kin-Hoe Chow, Dong-Mi Shin, Molly H. Jenkins, Emily E. Miller, David J. Shih, Seungbum Choi, Benjamin E. Low, Vivek Philip, Brad Rybinski, Roderick T. Bronson, Michael D. Taylor and Kyuson Yun
Kin-Hoe Chow
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dong-Mi Shin
2Laboratory of Immunogenetics, NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
3Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly H. Jenkins
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily E. Miller
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Shih
4Division of Neurosurgery, Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seungbum Choi
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin E. Low
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vivek Philip
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brad Rybinski
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roderick T. Bronson
5Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Taylor
4Division of Neurosurgery, Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyuson Yun
1The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Kyuson.yun@jax.org
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3293 Published September 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A central confounding factor in the development of targeted therapies is tumor cell heterogeneity, particularly in tumor-initiating cells (TIC), within clinically identical tumors. Here, we show how activation of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway in neural stem and progenitor cells creates a foundation for tumor cell evolution to heterogeneous states that are histologically indistinguishable but molecularly distinct. In spontaneous medulloblastomas that arise in Patched (Ptch)+/− mice, we identified three distinct tumor subtypes. Through cell type–specific activation of the SHH pathway in vivo, we determined that different cells of origin evolved in unique ways to generate these subtypes. Moreover, TICs in each subtype had distinct molecular and cellular phenotypes. At the bulk tumor level, the three tumor subtypes could be distinguished by a 465-gene signature and by differential activation levels of the ERK and AKT pathways. Notably, TICs from different subtypes were differentially sensitive to SHH or AKT pathway inhibitors, highlighting new mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies. In summary, our results show how evolutionary processes act on distinct cells of origin to contribute to tumoral heterogeneity, at both bulk tumor and TIC levels. Cancer Res; 74(17); 4864–74. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

While the existence of tumor-initiating cells (TIC) in some tumor types remains controversial, their existence has been well established for brain tumors, both in human and mouse models (1–4). Because TICs have been shown to be more resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy than bulk tumor cells and are thought to be responsible for tumor recurrence, there is great interest in developing novel therapies to target these cells (5). However, progress is impeded by both intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity in TIC phenotypes even within the same clinical tumor type (3). Hence, elucidating the source and functional consequences of TIC heterogeneity is a critical step in advancing this field.

Medulloblastomas account for approximately 20% of all brain tumors in children (6), and they form in the cerebellum, a brain region that develops postnatally through massive expansion and differentiation of neural progenitors in the external granule layer (EGL; ref. 7). Molecularly, human medulloblastomas can be divided into four subgroups: SHH, WNT, Group 3, and Group 4 (8). The “SHH (sonic hedgehog)” subgroup of tumors constitute approximately 25% of human medulloblastomas, and are recognized by high levels of the SHH pathway activity. During normal cerebellar development, the SHH pathway drives rapid proliferation of EGL progenitor cells. Hence, it is not surprising that mutations that activate SHH pathway genes, such as PTCH, GLI1/2, SUFU, or SMO, are common in the SHH subgroup of medulloblastomas (9, 10). Interestingly, even among the SHH subgroup of patients with medulloblastoma, there is heterogeneity in terms of prognosis, age of onset, and clinical pathology (11), suggesting that further analyses of tumor heterogeneity within this subgroup is necessary to better understand and treat these tumors.

Patched (Ptch) is a negative regulator of the SHH pathway, and the Ptch+/− mice develop spontaneous medulloblastomas, similar to patients with Gorlin syndrome (12, 13). Consequently, Ptch+/− mice have been extensively used to understand the etiology of medulloblastomas (14) and to test the efficacy of SHH pathway inhibitors for cancer treatment (15, 16). Previous studies reported that TICs in this model are CD15+ cells (4, 17). However, the reported ex vivo cellular phenotype of TICs in Ptch tumors was inconsistent: Read and colleagues indicated that TICs from Ptch medulloblastomas do not form tumorspheres in culture (4), whereas Ward and colleagues reported that they formed tumorspheres in serum-free neural stem cell (NSC) medium (17). While tumorsphere formation is not strictly correlated with tumor initiation, tumorsphere cultures are commonly used to propagate TICs ex vivo, based on the observations that NSCs can be propagated and maintained as spheres in serum-free culture medium (18). Variable sphere formation abilities from individual tumors of the same clinical subtype have been reported by several laboratories, indicating that it is not due to lab-to-lab variations in techniques or reagents but may represent inherent differences among tumors.

We hypothesized that the differential ability of TICs to survive and proliferate in culture may reflect intrinsic biologic differences among different tumors. Specifically, the fact that cellular transformation can occur in either NSCs or neural progenitor cells (NPC) in the Ptch+/− mouse suggests that TICs in these medulloblastomas may have different cellular behaviors depending on the cell of origin. We tested this hypothesis through systematic analyses of a large number of spontaneous Ptch tumors and by cell type–specific activation of the SHH pathway in vivo.

We now report that medulloblastomas in Ptch+/− mice are composed of three subtypes, distinguishable at both TIC and bulk tumor levels. This study directly demonstrates the differential outcomes of transforming stem versus progenitor cells by the same oncogenic event in vivo, and shows that the cell of origin is a major contributor of tumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, it shows that the pathways driving TICs and bulk tumor cell proliferation and survival can be distinct in the same tumor, cautioning against selection of targeted therapies solely based on the dominant molecular signature of bulk tumor cells.

Materials and Methods

Intracranial injections and limiting dilution assays

Freshly dissociated tumor cells were injected into the cerebella of NSG mice using a stereotaxic device (Bregma: +1/−6.5/−3.0). TIC frequency was calculated using the ELDA software (19).

Microarray

Microarray analysis was performed using Affymetrix St1.0 chips using independent no growth (NG; n = 7), growth factor–dependent (GFD; n = 6), and growth factor–independent (GFI; n = 4) samples. One-way ANOVA was used to identify genes that distinguish the three tumor subtypes. A list of 465 genes identified in this analysis was used for principal component analysis and to identify potentially enriched biologic processes using the GSEA software (20). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 465 genes was performed on the Spring 2012 release by pairwise comparisons of GFD-GFI, GFD-NG, and NG-GFI tumors. The Affymetrix gene expression dataset has been deposited in GEO.

Real-time Reverse Transcription-PCR

Real-time RT-PCR analyses were performed using the iQ5 Optical System from Bio-Rad with SYBR Green mix and primers indicated in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Spectral karyotyping

Metaphase spreads were prepared from p1 to p3 tumorsphere cells from different culture subtypes and prepared using SkyPaint following the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Spectral Imaging). Captured images were analyzed using Applied Spectral Imaging HiSKY5.0 software.

Immunohistochemistry

Antibodies listed in Supplementary Materials and Methods were used on frozen and paraffin sections following standard protocols.

Immunoblotting

Thirty to 50 μg of total lysates from tumor tissues were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Standard immunoblotting technique was used.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism software was used to generate survival curves and calculate statistical significance. For additional information, please see Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Results

Spontaneous medulloblastomas in Ptch+/− mice are composed of three distinct subtypes

To systematically analyze cellular and molecular phenotypes of tumor cells in each spontaneous Ptch+/− medulloblastoma, we performed multiple parallel analyses in vivo and ex vivo (Fig. 1A). First, from each spontaneous (Generation1: G1) tumor, we propagated the tumor by directly injecting freshly dissociated tumor cells, without culture, orthotopically into cerebella of NOD-SCID;Il2gr−/− (NSG) mice. In parallel, single tumor cells were plated at a clonal density (1 cell/μL) in serum-free NSC media containing basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and EGF or in serum-free medium containing no exogenous growth factors (NSC-GF medium) and tumorsphere formation was measured 7 days later. If no spheres were present in either media, the tumor was designated as the NG subtype; if spheres were present only in NSC medium, the tumor was designated as the GFD subtype; and if spheres were present in NSC-GF media, the tumor was designated as the GFI subtype for its potential to grow in the absence of exogenous growth factors (Table 1). As shown in Table 1, 38% of all tumors analyzed were classified as NG and 38% and 24% were classified as GFD and GFI, respectively. Interestingly, the distribution of the subtypes did not vary significantly from Ptch;p53+/+, Ptch;p53+/−, and Ptch;p53−/− mice (Table 1). However, the loss of p53 accelerated tumor latency in Ptch+/− mice (Supplementary Fig. S1A), consistent with a previous report (21).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Systematic analysis of TICs in Ptch+/− medulloblastomas reveals three distinct subtypes. A, a schematic of in vivo and ex vivo analyses performed with spontaneous medulloblastomas that formed in Ptch+/−, Ptch;p53+/−, and Ptch;p53−/− mice. Spontaneous tumors (G1) were serially passaged orthotopically without culture in vivo. In parallel, freshly isolated tumor cells were tested for sphere formation at a clonal density. Similar analyses were performed at subsequent generations (G2 to G5). B, hematoxylin and eosin staining of the three subtypes of G1 and G3 tumors. Scale bar, 100 μm. C, survival analysis of mice injected with 1,000 G1 tumor cells from different subtypes of Ptch+/−;p53+/+ medulloblastomas. G2 mice injected with GFI cells die significantly earlier (P = 0.0554). D, G2 mice injected with 100,000 G1 cells show significantly longer survival for mice bearing NG tumors (P < 0.0105). See also Supplementary Fig S2. E, GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells express markers for neurons (MAP2), astrocytes (GFAP), and oligodendrocytes (NG2) when induced to differentiate as adherent cultures. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; in blue).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Cellular characteristics of TICs in Ptch medulloblastoma subtypes

To test whether this cellular phenotype (sphere formation in different culture conditions) is a cell-intrinsic characteristic of tumor-propagating cells in each tumor, we isolated and tested cellular phenotypes of Generation 2 (G2) tumors that formed from direct transfer of G1 tumors (Fig. 1A). Again, acutely dissociated cells from G2 tumors were orthotopically transplanted into NSG cerebella to generate G3 tumors, and, in parallel, were plated at a clonal density in NSC and NSC-GF media to test their growth properties ex vivo (Fig. 1A). We consistently observed that G2 tumor culture phenotypes remained identical to those of the G1 tumors. Specifically, the NG subtype of G1 tumors generated NG-subtype G2 tumors, GFD-subtype G1 tumors generated GFD G2 tumors, and GFI-subtype G1 tumors generated GFI G2 subtypes. The ex vivo growth phenotype of tumors tested in G3, G4, and G5 tumors remained identical to those of G1 tumors in >83% (39/47) of tumors tested, indicating that ex vivo sphere formation and growth factor dependence are variable and cell-intrinsic phenotypes of tumor-propagating cells in the original tumor.

More than 93% (44/47) of spontaneous tumors in Ptch mice formed G2 tumors upon orthotopic transplantation without culture. Hundred percent (35/35) of G2 tumors tested formed G3, G4, and G5 tumors via serial transplantation. At the histologic level, these transplanted tumors were identical to the G1 tumors and indistinguishable from each other (Fig. 1B). Together, these observations indicate that regardless of tumor subtype, Ptch medulloblastomas contain long-term, self-renewing stem cell–like cells that can initiate tumors upon serial transplantation for at least five generations in vivo.

TIC frequencies in vivo and TIC phenotypes ex vivo

To further analyze the three tumor subtypes, we measured the TIC frequency of G1 tumors by limiting dilution analysis in vivo. To do this, we injected 105, 104, 103, and 102 G1 tumor cells orthotopically into NSG mice cerebella (unlike cortical injections previously reported; ref. 22) and measured the incidence of tumor formation in recipient mice at each cell dose. The TIC frequency was 1 in 18,395 cells in the NG subtype, in which TICs require the in vivo microenvironment to proliferate and/or survive; 1 in 918 in the GFD subtype, in which the TICs require exogenous growth factors for proliferation and survival ex vivo; and 1 in 217 in the GFI subtype, in which forms TICs proliferate and self-renew in the absence of exogenous growth factors ex vivo (95% confidence interval; Table 1). Consistently, Kaplan–Meier survival analyses of G2 mice injected with 100 or 1,000 uncultured G1 tumor cells show that mice bearing the GFI subtype showed shorter survival time than the other two subtypes (P = 0.0554; Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S2A). When survival times of G2 mice injected with 100,000 G1 tumor cells were compared, mice bearing NG tumor cells survived significantly longer than the other two subtypes (P = 0.0105; Fig. 1D). Analyses of cell proliferation and apoptosis in G1 and G2 tumors of each subtype showed no significant differences (Supplementary Fig. S2B), suggesting that the major driver for differential G2 tumor latency is the frequency of TICs in different G1 tumor subtypes.

We next analyzed self-renewal and multipotentiality of TICs ex vivo. As the NG subtype of tumorspheres cannot be cultured, we limited our ex vivo analyses to GFD and GFI tumorspheres. Acutely dissociated tumor cells were plated at a clonal density (1 cell/μL) and the resulting clonally derived tumorspheres were analyzed. Morphologically, GFD tumorspheres resembled normal neurospheres (Fig. 1E). In contrast, many GFI tumorsphere lines formed loosely adherent, amorphic spheres composed of smaller, EGL progenitor-like cells (Fig. 1E). Both GFD and GFI tumorspheres could be propagated for >6 passages at a clonal density (Supplementary Fig. S2C), suggesting that they are long-term self-renewing cells. The frequency of self-renewing cells in each tumorsphere line ranged from 0.5%–6%, depending on the individual tumor. We also tested whether tumorsphere cells were multipotential, that is, able to give rise to neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, by plating dissociated GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells on poly-d-lysine–coated coverslips and culturing them in differentiation medium. GFD and GFI culture cells expressed markers for neurons (MAP2, ß-III-tubulin), astrocytes (GFAP), and oligodendrocytes (NG2, O4, CNPase), suggesting that they can differentiate along both neuronal and glial lineages (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. S1B).

Finally, we tested the tumorigenic potential of tumorspheres cells by injecting low passage (<passage 5) cells into NSG mouse cerebella. Both GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells produced tumors that phenocopied the original tumor (Table 1; and Supplementary Fig. S1C and S1D). These observations indicate that tumorsphere cultures from both GFD and GFI subtypes contain long-term self-renewing, multipotential, and tumorigenic cells (TICs) that can be propagated ex vivo.

GFD tumorspheres do not depend on the SHH pathway

Because Ptch-induced medulloblastomas are thought to represent the SHH subgroup of human medulloblastoma (9) and bulk tumor cells in all tumors express high levels of the SHH pathway genes (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S3), we tested whether TICs in all subtypes also depend on the SHH pathway for self-renewal, proliferation, or survival. We plated GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells at a clonal density and treated them with a SHH pathway inhibitor, cyclopamine. All GFI cultures tested were sensitive to SHH pathway inhibition as anticipated (Fig. 2B); however, despite high levels of SHH pathway activation in GFD tumor tissues (Fig. 2A), all GFD TIC cultures tested were resistant to cyclopamine treatment (Fig. 2B). To test whether the dependence of GFI cultures on the SHH pathway is due to lack of exogenous growth factors (bFGF and EGF) in the medium, we cultured GFI TICs in the NSC medium and then tested their dependence on the SHH pathway. GFI TICs cultured in NSC medium remained exquisitely sensitive to cyclopamine treatment (Fig. 2C). These results showed that extrinsic growth factors, bFGF and EGF, do not affect TIC phenotypes but rather GFD TICs are resistant to SHH inhibitor through a cell-intrinsic mechanism. This surprising result suggested that while bulk tumor cells in GFD tumors express high levels of SHH pathway genes and Atoh/Math1, a marker for EGL progenitors (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S3), TICs in GFD tumors do not depend on the SHH pathway for proliferation, self-renewal, or survival.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

All subtypes express high levels of SHH pathway genes, but GFD TICs are resistant to Smo inhibition. A, expression levels of Gli1, Gli2, and Atoh1 in G1 tumors, measured by real-time RT-PCR and normalized to 18S levels. Values represent relative fold change compared with wild-type postnatal day 8 cerebellum. Each colored dot represents an independent tumor. Also see Supplementary Fig S3. B, self-renewal assay of low passage (<p5) GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells in the presence or absence of 10 μmol/L cyclopamine for 7 days in vitro. C, self-renewal of GFI cells is blocked by cyclopamine treatment even when cultured in NSC medium (n = 4). D, RT-PCR analysis of low passage (p<5) GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells in culture. Relative fold changes shown in a log scale, compared with wild-type cerebellar NSCs isolated from wild-type p8 cerebellum. Each bar represents tumorspheres from independent tumors.

To test whether cultured tumorspheres, particularly GFD TICs, lose expression of the SHH pathway genes, we measured SHH pathway gene expression levels in GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells at low passage (<passage 5). Real-time RT-PCR analysis of multiple independent tumorsphere lines showed that compared with normal cerebellar NSCs, GFD tumorsphere cells express higher levels of Gli1 and SHH (Fig. 2D). Interestingly high-level Atoh1 expression was unique to GFI tumorspheres, suggesting that GFD tumorspheres may be blocked in their differentiation to EGL progenitor-like cells ex vivo.

NSCs and NPCs generate TICs with distinct cellular phenotypes

On the basis of sphere morphology, gene expression patterns, and growth factor requirements, we hypothesized that the GFD subtype originates from transformed NSCs. To directly test this hypothesis, we activated the SHH pathway in a cell type–specific manner in vivo. In SmoM2 mice, a constitutively active form of Smo is expressed upon Cre-mediated recombination (23). To express SmoM2 in early NSCs, we crossed SmoM2 mice with hGFAP-cre mice. The hGFAP-cre driver activates the transgene expression in cerebellar NSCs as early as E14.5 (24). Each SmoM2;GFAP-cre mice developed medulloblastomas by 3 to 4 weeks of age, as previously reported (23, 24). To analyze the cellular phenotypes of these tumor cells ex vivo, we dissociated SmoM2;hGFAP-cre tumor cells and plated them at a clonal density in NSC and NSC-GF media. Strikingly, 100% of the tumors tested formed tumorspheres only in NSC medium but not in NSC-GF medium, indicating that they are GFD tumors (Fig. 3A, n = 8). In contrast, when SmoM2 was activated only in committed EGL progenitors, by administering tamoxifen to SmoM2;Atoh1-CreER mice at postnatal days 7 to 10, none of the tumors generated tumorspheres in either NSC or NSC-GF medium, indicating they are NG tumors (Fig. 3B, n = 6). This result indicates that NG tumors arise from transformed EGL progenitor cells. Molecularly and histologically, SmoM2;GFAP-cre and SmoM2;Atoh1-CreER tumors could not be distinguished from each other or from Ptch tumors (Figs. 1B, 2A, and 3C–E and Supplementary Fig. S3). Together, these observations indicate that both NSCs and NPCs can be transformed by the SHH pathway activation in vivo but transformation of NSCs and NPCs result in TICs with drastically different cellular phenotypes.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Cell type–specific activation indicates that GFD tumors arise from transformed NSCs while NG tumors arise from NPCs. A, activation of the SHH pathway by expressing SmoM2 (activated Smoothen) in NSCs in vivo (SmoM2;hGFAP-cre) generated only GFD tumors (8/8). Also see Supplementary Fig. S6 for histology of tumor derived from injecting SmoM2;hGFAP-cre tumorsphere cells. B, expression of SmoM2 in committed EGL progenitors (SmoM2;Atoh-creER) by tamoxifen treatment from p7–p10 generated only NG tumors (6/6). C and D, hematoxylin and eosin staining of SmoM2;hGFAP-cre and SmoM2;Atoh-creER tumors. E, SHH pathway gene expression in independent SmoM2;hGFAP-cre and SmoM2;AtohCreER tumor tissues. Relative fold change compared with wild-type p8 cerebellum.

Gain of chromosome 6 is associated with the most aggressive subtype, GFI

Interestingly, neither the SmoM2;hGFAP-cre nor SmoM2;Atoh-CreER mice produced GFI tumors. As mentioned above, approximately 83% of Ptch tumors retained their phenotype through several generations of in vivo passaging; however, approximately 17% (8/47 tested) switched cellular phenotypes around G4 in vivo, always to the GFI subtype. We postulated that this represents tumor evolution in vivo.

To investigate whether a recurring genetic alteration is associated with GFI tumors, we performed high-resolution spectral karyotyping (SKY) analysis on low-passage tumorsphere cells from GFD, GFI, and GFD-to-GFI transformed tumors (Fig. 4A). Multiple genetic alterations were present in each sample, but the only recurring alteration associated with the GFI subtype was a gain of chromosome 6 (Fig. 4A and B). All GFI samples tested (n = 4) were composed of >80% trisomy 6 cells. In contrast, a GFD sample that remained GFD through five generations of in vivo transfer contained no trisomy 6 cells at G1. Interestingly, GFD tumors that progressed to GFI at G4 during in vivo passage (tumor numbers 4951 and 5333) contained a minor fraction (<30%) of trisomy 6 cells at G1. When these tumors became GFI at G4 in vivo (ICF918 and ICF937, respectively), trisomy 6 cells dominated the tumorsphere cultures (>80%; Fig. 4B). Together, these observations suggest that acquisition of the GFI phenotype is associated with the gain of chromosome 6.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Trisomy 6 is associated with the GFI subtype. A, SKY analysis of GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells at low passage (<passage 3) shows gain of chromosome 6 in all GFI tumorspheres (n = 4). B, quantitation of trisomy 6 cells in GFD and GFI tumorspheres by SKY. When G1 GFD tumors 4951 and 5333 progressed to the GFI subtype at G4 in vivo (ICF918 and ICF937, respectively), trisomy 6 cells dominated the tumorsphere cultures. C, a representative image of FISH analyses on G1 tumor tissues with Cy-3 labeled chromosome 6 and Cy5-labeled chromosome 13 probes. D, quantitation of chromosome 6 counts in multiple independent NG, GFD, and GFI tumor tissues at G1.

Interestingly, gain of chromosome 6 has been observed in a subset of tumors in other medulloblastoma mouse models (25–27). To further test whether gain of chromosome 6 is associated with the GFI subtype, we performed FISH on G1 tumor tissues (Fig. 4C and D). Consistent with the SKY results, NG and GFD tumors that retained their original phenotype throughout in vivo passaging contained <10% trisomy 6 nuclei (Fig. 4D), whereas all GFI tumors contained >30% trisomy nuclei at G1. Interestingly, NG and GFD tumors that progressed to GFI phenotype during in vivo passaging already contained approximately 30% trisomy 6 cells at G1 (Supplementary Fig. S4). For example, 5333 GFD tumor, which progressed to GFI at G4 and showed approximately 30% trisomy 6 cells in low-passage tumorsphere culture by SKY analysis (Fig. 4B), also showed approximately 30% trisomy 6 cells in the G1 tumor tissue (Supplementary Fig. S4). These observations suggest that gain of chromosome 6 precedes acquisition of the GFI phenotype and that trisomy 6 is indeed closely correlated with the GFI subtype. Together, our analyses of tumorsphere cultures, genomic alterations detected by SKY and FISH, and results from serial in vivo transfer all indicate that the GFI subtype arises from either NSC or NPCs as tumors evolve to become more aggressive tumors.

AKT and ERK pathways are differentially activated in the three tumor subtypes

We reasoned that if TICs that propagate these tumors are molecularly and genetically distinguishable, the bulk tumor cells might also be molecularly distinct. To test this idea, we performed an unbiased transcriptome analysis of multiple independent Ptch+/−;p53+/+ G1 tumors. Using one-way ANOVA analysis, we identified 465 genes that can distinguish the three tumor subtypes (Supplementary Table S1). A principal component analysis using these genes showed a clear segregation of the three tumor subtypes (Fig. 5A). Gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of the 465 genes showed that genes on chromosome 6 were overrepresented at the top of a ranked list of differentially expressed genes between GFD and GFI tumors (Fig. 5B, P<0.001). To test whether these subtypes model different human medulloblastoma subgroups, we compared gene expression profiles of Ptch tumors to those of human medulloblastomas. All three subtypes best matched the SHH subgroup of human medulloblastoma (Fig. 5C and D), consistent with high levels of the SHH pathway gene expression at the bulk tumor level in all three subtypes.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

The three Ptch medulloblastoma subtypes are molecularly distinguishable at the bulk tumor level and model the human SHH subgroup of medulloblastomas. A, principal component analysis with 465 genes identified in the ANOVA analysis of G1 tumor tissues. B, a GSEA shows that genes on chromosome 6 are highly ranked among differentially expressed genes between GFI and GFD tumors (P < 0.001). C, AGDEX comparison of mouse NG, GFD, and GFI tumors to human medulloblastoma subgroups. Bars represent the cosine similarity measure and reflect the similarity of global expression profile between each mouse tumor subtype and each human medulloblastoma subgroup. D, medulloblastoma subgroup assignment by differential marker expression and PAM classification. Heatmaps depict the differential expression of subgroup-specific markers for the human training cohort (left) and the mouse tumors (right). Subgroup assignments are indicated above the heatmap. All mouse tumors are classified with ≥99% confidence probability.

To determine whether the three tumor subtypes can be distinguished by different signaling pathway activities, we performed Ingenuity Pathway Analysis with the 465-gene list. The top three molecular networks included AKT and ERK1/2 as major nodes (Fig. 6A and Supplementary Fig. S5). Immunoblotting analyses with antibodies that recognize activated AKT (phospho-AKT Thr308) and activated ERK (phospho-ERK Thr202/204) showed significantly lower levels of AKT activation in GFD tumors and significantly higher levels of pERK activation in GFI tumors (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

The three medulloblastoma subtypes are distinguishable by different levels of ERK and AKT activation. A, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis showing the top three networks across each of the three pairwise comparisons (GFD vs. GFI, GFD vs. NG, and NG vs. GFI) of bulk tumor tissue gene expression using the 465-gene list. Shown here is GFD versus GFI comparison, where red colored nodes indicate relatively higher expression and green nodes indicate relatively lower expression in GFI compared with GFD. Also see Supplementary Fig. S5 for GFD-NG and NG-GFI comparisons. B, immunoblot analysis of AKT and ERK pathway activation from G1 tumor tissues. GFD>GFI, a transplanted tumor sample that evolved from the GFD subtype to GFI subtype in vivo. C, in vitro secondary sphere formation assay on low passage (<p5) GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells in the presence or absence of triciribine (100 nmol/L). Four independent tumorspheres lines of each subtype were tested.

To test whether activated AKT plays a critical role in promoting survival and proliferation of Ptch medulloblastoma TICs, we treated GFD and GFI tumorsphere cells with an AKT inhibitor, triciribine. As shown in Fig. 6C, GFI tumorsphere self-renewal was completely blocked by 100nmol/L triciribine treatment. In contrast, GFD tumorsphere cells were relatively insensitive to AKT inhibition and formed >50% secondary spheres compared with DMSO-treated control cultures, even at 10-fold higher concentration of the drug (Fig. 6C and not shown). Together, these data indicate that both tumorspheres and bulk tumor cells of the GFI and GFD subtypes show differential activation level and dependence on the AKT pathway.

Discussion

The Ptch+/− mouse model of medulloblastoma has been used as a single tumor model to elucidate the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in medulloblastoma formation and to test SHH pathway inhibitors. Our finding that there are three distinct tumor subtypes in this model system has broad implications. First, it may explain the heterogeneity within the SHH subgroup: human SHH tumors are found predominantly in either infants (age <3 years) or adults (age >18 years), and these subgroups show different molecular and clinical phenotypes (11). Activation of the SHH pathway resulted in tumors in either weaning age mice (Smo-M2;hGFAP-cre) or in adult mice (Smo-M2;Atoh-CreER) depending on the timing of SHH pathway activation and target cell type (Fig. 3). Hence, one could speculate that infantile and adult human SHH medulloblastomas arise from different cells of origin. Second, this study may provide explanations for conflicting observations in the field, such as tumorsphere formation ability of tumorspheres in Ptch tumors (4, 17). Third, it provides a potentially novel mechanism of therapy resistance to SHH inhibitors. Previously, Buonamici and colleagues analyzed LDE225-resistant Ptch tumors to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the emergence of therapy-resistant tumors to SHH inhibitor treatment (16). They observed that while many resistant tumors developed new mutations in the SHH pathway genes as expected, approximately 50% of the tumors did not contain any new mutations in the SHH pathway genes. On the basis of our findings, a possible explanation for this observation is that these tumors correspond to the GFD subtype. TICs in GFD subtype tumors do not depend on the SHH pathway and therefore, there would be no selective pressure for cells with mutations within the SHH pathway for resistant tumors to emerge.

Our study provides evidence that activation of the AKT pathway may be a significant cooperating oncogenic event in progenitor-derived tumors, but not stem cell–derived tumors. AKT activation is commonly observed in many human cancers, and others have shown that it plays an important role in conferring radiotherapy resistance to perivascular cancer stem cells in another mouse model of medulloblastoma (28). While the effect of AKT inhibition on different subtypes of Ptch medulloblastoma needs to be tested in vivo, exquisite sensitivity of GFI tumorspheres to the AKT inhibitor Triciribine in vitro suggests that a combination therapy targeting the SHH and AKT pathways may be effective in treating the GFI subtype.

GFI tumors are associated with gain of chromosome 6, although the presence of trisomy 6 cells before acquisition of the GFI phenotype suggests that gain of chromosome 6 is not sufficient to confer the GFI phenotype on its own. However, it seems to be an early step in progression to the GFI tumor subtype. Notably, gain of chromosome 6 is a common genetic alteration observed in other mouse models of medulloblastoma (25–27). It will be informative to test if tumors with trisomy 6 cells are more aggressive in these models and to determine whether the heterogeneity of TICs we identified is recapitulated in these tumor models. Mouse chromosome 6 contains many oncogenes, including many that are upstream of ERK activation, such as Kras, BRAF, and MET, and epigenetic regulators such as EZH2. In other cancer types, ERK activation has been shown to be associated with tumor progression, metastasis, and invasion (29). Elevated EZH2 expression is correlated with human medulloblastomas with chromosome 7 gain (subgroup 3 and 4), and it has been reported that inhibition of EZH2 suppresses tumorsphere formation (30, 31).

Elucidating the etiology and functional consequences of TIC heterogeneity in a given clinical tumor type is critical for developing therapies that efficiently target TICs. This study demonstrates that the cell-of-origin has a significant determining role in molecular and cellular phenotypes of TICs and that transformation of NSCs or NPCs by the same oncogenic hit can produce distinct TICs and tumor subtypes. Importantly, our data show that pathways that drive TIC proliferation in some tumors are distinct from those that drive the bulk tumor cells, providing direct proof-of-principle evidence that eradicating TICs and bulk tumors may require different targeted therapies. This study has wide implications that range from highlighting the power and inherent limitations of genetically engineered cancer models to elucidating a source of TIC heterogeneity that may invoke new strategies for identifying pathway-specific inhibitors as anticancer agents.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: M.H. Jenkins, K. Yun

Development of methodology: K.-H. Chow, M.H. Jenkins, K. Yun

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): K.-H. Chow, M.H. Jenkins, E.E. Miller, S. Choi, B.E. Low, B. Rybinski, R.T. Bronson, M.D. Taylor, K. Yun

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): K.-H. Chow, D.-M. Shin, M.H. Jenkins, E.E. Miller, D.J. Shih, S. Choi, B.E. Low, V. Philip, R.T. Bronson, K. Yun

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: K.-H. Chow, D.-M. Shin, E.E. Miller, S. Choi, B.E. Low, M.D. Taylor, K. Yun

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): K.-H. Chow, B.E. Low, K. Yun

Study supervision: K. Yun

Other (conducted pathologic analyses): R.T. Bronson

Grant Support

This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute Center Support Grant P30CA034196 and a gift from Walter and Dorsey Cabot (to K. Yun).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ellen Akeson for SKY analysis, Jesse Hammer for assistance with figures, Pat Cherry for administrative assistance, Carol Bult for guidance on the use of MGI tools, Jane Johnson for the MATH1 antibody, Lindsay Shopland for guidance on FISH analysis, and Susan Ackerman, Patsy Nishina, Barbara Knowles, and Rob Burgess for critical reading of the article.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received November 19, 2013.
  • Revision received June 5, 2014.
  • Accepted June 11, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Singh SK,
    2. Hawkins C,
    3. Clarke ID,
    4. Squire JA,
    5. Bayani J,
    6. Hide T,
    7. et al.
    Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 2004;432:396–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Harris MA,
    2. Yang H,
    3. Low BE,
    4. Mukherje J,
    5. Guha A,
    6. Bronson RT,
    7. et al.
    Cancer stem cells are enriched in the side population cells in a mouse model of glioma. Cancer Res 2008;68:10051–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Visvader JE,
    2. Lindeman GJ
    . Cancer stem cells: current status and evolving complexities. Cell Stem Cell 2012;10:717–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Read TA,
    2. Fogarty MP,
    3. Markant SL,
    4. McLendon RE,
    5. Wei Z,
    6. Ellison DW,
    7. et al.
    Identification of CD15 as a marker for tumor-propagating cells in a mouse model of medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 2009;15:135–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Frank NY,
    2. Schatton T,
    3. Frank MH
    . The therapeutic promise of the cancer stem cell concept. J Clin Invest 2010;120:41–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Saran A
    . Medulloblastoma: role of developmental pathways, DNA repair signaling, and other players. Curr Mol Med 2009;9:1046–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Roussel MF,
    2. Hatten ME
    . Cerebellum development and medulloblastoma. Curr Top Dev Biol 2011;94:235–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Taylor MD,
    2. Northcott PA,
    3. Korshunov A,
    4. Remke M,
    5. Cho YJ,
    6. Clifford SC,
    7. et al.
    Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol 2012;123:465–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lau J,
    2. Schmidt C,
    3. Markant SL,
    4. Taylor MD,
    5. Wechsler-Reya RJ,
    6. Weiss WA
    . Matching mice to malignancy: molecular subgroups and models of medulloblastoma. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28:521–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Northcott PA,
    2. Shih DJ,
    3. Peacock J,
    4. Garzia L,
    5. Morrissy AS,
    6. Zichner T,
    7. et al.
    Subgroup-specific structural variation across 1,000 medulloblastoma genomes. Nature 2012;488:49–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Northcott PA,
    2. Hielscher T,
    3. Dubuc A,
    4. Mack S,
    5. Shih D,
    6. Remke M,
    7. et al.
    Pediatric and adult sonic hedgehog medulloblastomas are clinically and molecularly distinct. Acta Neuropathol 2011;122:231–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hahn H,
    2. Wicking C,
    3. Zaphiropoulous PG,
    4. Gailani MR,
    5. Shanley S,
    6. Chidambaram A,
    7. et al.
    Mutations of the human homolog of Drosophila patched in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Cell 1996;85:841–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Goodrich LV,
    2. Milenkovic L,
    3. Higgins KM,
    4. Scott MP
    . Altered neural cell fates and medulloblastoma in mouse patched mutants. Science 1997;277:1109–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Corcoran RB,
    2. Scott MP
    . A mouse model for medulloblastoma and basal cell nevus syndrome. J Neuro Oncol 2001;53:307–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Romer JT,
    2. Kimura H,
    3. Magdaleno S,
    4. Sasai K,
    5. Fuller C,
    6. Baines H,
    7. et al.
    Suppression of the Shh pathway using a small molecule inhibitor eliminates medulloblastoma in Ptc1(+/−)p53(−/−) mice. Cancer Cell 2004;6:229–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Buonamici S,
    2. Williams J,
    3. Morrissey M,
    4. Wang A,
    5. Guo R,
    6. Vattay A,
    7. et al.
    Interfering with resistance to smoothened antagonists by inhibition of the PI3K pathway in medulloblastoma. Sci Transl Med 2010;2:51ra70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ward RJ,
    2. Lee L,
    3. Graham K,
    4. Satkunendran T,
    5. Yoshikawa K,
    6. Ling E,
    7. et al.
    Multipotent CD15+ cancer stem cells in patched-1-deficient mouse medulloblastoma. Cancer Res 2009;69:4682–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Reynolds BA,
    2. Weiss S
    . Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 1992;255:1707–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hu Y,
    2. Smyth GK
    . ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. J Immunol Methods 2009;347:70–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Subramanian A,
    2. Tamayo P,
    3. Mootha VK,
    4. Mukherjee S,
    5. Ebert BL,
    6. Gillette MA,
    7. et al.
    Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15545–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wetmore C,
    2. Eberhart DE,
    3. Curran T
    . Loss of p53 but not ARF accelerates medulloblastoma in mice heterozygous for patched. Cancer Res 2001;61:513–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kawauchi D,
    2. Robinson G,
    3. Uziel T,
    4. Gibson P,
    5. Rehg J,
    6. Gao C,
    7. et al.
    A mouse model of the most aggressive subgroup of human medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 2012;21:168–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Mao J,
    2. Ligon KL,
    3. Rakhlin EY,
    4. Thayer SP,
    5. Bronson RT,
    6. Rowitch D,
    7. et al.
    A novel somatic mouse model to survey tumorigenic potential applied to the Hedgehog pathway. Cancer Res 2006;66:10171–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Schuller U,
    2. Heine VM,
    3. Mao J,
    4. Kho AT,
    5. Dillon AK,
    6. Han YG,
    7. et al.
    Acquisition of granule neuron precursor identity is a critical determinant of progenitor cell competence to form Shh-induced medulloblastoma. Cancer Cell 2008;14:123–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yan CT,
    2. Kaushal D,
    3. Murphy M,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Datta A,
    6. Chen C,
    7. et al.
    XRCC4 suppresses medulloblastomas with recurrent translocations in p53-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:7378–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ayrault O,
    2. Zindy F,
    3. Rehg J,
    4. Sherr CJ,
    5. Roussel MF
    . Two tumor suppressors, p27Kip1 and patched-1, collaborate to prevent medulloblastoma. Mol Cancer Res 2009;7:33–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zindy F,
    2. Uziel T,
    3. Ayrault O,
    4. Calabrese C,
    5. Valentine M,
    6. Rehg JE,
    7. et al.
    Genetic alterations in mouse medulloblastomas and generation of tumors de novo from primary cerebellar granule neuron precursors. Cancer Res 2007;67:2676–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hambardzumyan D,
    2. Becher OJ,
    3. Rosenblum MK,
    4. Pandolfi PP,
    5. Manova-Todorova K,
    6. Holland EC
    . PI3K pathway regulates survival of cancer stem cells residing in the perivascular niche following radiation in medulloblastoma in vivo . Genes Dev 2008;22:436–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Wagner EF,
    2. Nebreda AR
    . Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:537–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Robinson G,
    2. Parker M,
    3. Kranenburg TA,
    4. Lu C,
    5. Chen X,
    6. Ding L,
    7. et al.
    Novel mutations target distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma. Nature 2012;488:43–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Alimova I,
    2. Venkataraman S,
    3. Harris P,
    4. Marquez VE,
    5. Northcott PA,
    6. Dubuc A,
    7. et al.
    Targeting the enhancer of zeste homologue 2 in medulloblastoma. Int J Cancer 2012;131:1800–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 74 (17)
September 2014
Volume 74, Issue 17
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epigenetic States of Cells of Origin and Tumor Evolution Drive Tumor-Initiating Cell Phenotype and Tumor Heterogeneity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Epigenetic States of Cells of Origin and Tumor Evolution Drive Tumor-Initiating Cell Phenotype and Tumor Heterogeneity
Kin-Hoe Chow, Dong-Mi Shin, Molly H. Jenkins, Emily E. Miller, David J. Shih, Seungbum Choi, Benjamin E. Low, Vivek Philip, Brad Rybinski, Roderick T. Bronson, Michael D. Taylor and Kyuson Yun
Cancer Res September 1 2014 (74) (17) 4864-4874; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3293

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Epigenetic States of Cells of Origin and Tumor Evolution Drive Tumor-Initiating Cell Phenotype and Tumor Heterogeneity
Kin-Hoe Chow, Dong-Mi Shin, Molly H. Jenkins, Emily E. Miller, David J. Shih, Seungbum Choi, Benjamin E. Low, Vivek Philip, Brad Rybinski, Roderick T. Bronson, Michael D. Taylor and Kyuson Yun
Cancer Res September 1 2014 (74) (17) 4864-4874; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3293
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • mtDNA-Oncogene Cross-Talk
  • Alternative NFκB Regulates ALDH+ Ovarian Cancer Cells
  • R-Spondin1/LGR5 Activates TGFβ in Colon Cancer Metastasis
Show more Tumor and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement