Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Tumor and Stem Cell Biology

SCCA1/SERPINB3 Promotes Oncogenesis and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition via the Unfolded Protein Response and IL6 Signaling

Namratha Sheshadri, Joseph M. Catanzaro, Alex J. Bott, Yu Sun, Erica Ullman, Emily I. Chen, Ji-An Pan, Song Wu, Howard C. Crawford, Jianhua Zhang and Wei-Xing Zong
Namratha Sheshadri
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph M. Catanzaro
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex J. Bott
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu Sun
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Ullman
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily I. Chen
2Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji-An Pan
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Song Wu
3Department of Applied Math and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Howard C. Crawford
4Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianhua Zhang
5Department of Pathology, University of Alabama, Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei-Xing Zong
1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: weixing.zong@stonybrook.edu
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0798 Published November 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The serine/cysteine protease inhibitor SCCA1 (SERPINB3) is upregulated in many advanced cancers with poor prognosis, but there is limited information about whether it makes functional contributions to malignancy. Here, we show that SCCA1 expression promoted oncogenic transformation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in mammary epithelial cells, and that SCCA1 silencing in breast cancer cells halted their proliferation. SCCA1 overexpression in neu+ mammary tumors increased the unfolded protein response (UPR), IL6 expression, and inflammatory phenotypes. Mechanistically, SCCA1 induced a prolonged nonlethal increase in the UPR that was sufficient to activate NF-κB and expression of the protumorigenic cytokine IL6. Overall, our findings established that SCCA1 contributes to tumorigenesis by promoting EMT and a UPR-dependent induction of NF-κB and IL6 autocrine signaling that promotes a protumorigenic inflammation. Cancer Res; 74(21); 6318–29. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma antigens (SCCA) belong to the clade B subset of serpins that inhibit lysosomal proteases, including cathepsins, via the irreversible interaction between its carboxyl-terminal reactive site loop (RSL) and the target proteases (1, 2). The first variant of the SCCAs, SCCA1 (SERPINB3), an inhibitor of cathepsins L, S, and K, was initially found to be elevated in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix (3), and was later found to be highly expressed in SCCs of the lung, head and neck, and in hepatocellular carcinoma (4, 5). Its functional connection with tumorigenesis has been mainly appreciated for its anti–cell death role against lysosomal membrane permeability transition in response to various stresses such as UV, radiation, chemotherapy, TNFα, and natural killer cells (5–9). Nevertheless, accumulating evidence including that from our own group has indicated that elevated SCCA1 expression is associated with poorly differentiated and more inflammatory and aggressive human malignancies including breast cancer (10–12), pointing to additional molecular functions. We have recently reported that ectopic expression of SCCA1 leads to the inhibition of both proteasomal and lysosomal protein degradation (13), suggesting that elevated SCCA1 expression may lead to an increased unfolded protein response (UPR).

UPR is a complex signaling event that is activated by the disturbance of cellular protein homeostasis. Although it is well appreciated that excessive misfolded protein stress triggers apoptosis, UPR signaling under more physiologic conditions plays an important role in helping cells to cope with stress and to restore homeostasis. The connection between UPR and cancer has been well appreciated in light of cancer cells' highly increased growth rate and exposure to growth-limiting conditions such as nutrient deprivation and hypoxia (14, 15). Although overactivating UPR in cancer cells can lead to cell death and has been regarded as a therapeutic opportunity using proteotoxic agents, such as the proteasome inhibitor Velcade (bortezomib; refs. 16, 17), the UPR signaling pathway has been implied in promoting tumorigenesis by increasing tumor cell survival and proliferation (15, 18). However, it remains elusive how specific cell intrinsic lesions lead to increased UPR that functions as a driving factor in tumorigenesis. In this study, we report a previously unidentified protumorigenic role of SCCA1, which is via the induction of a nonlethal level of UPR that activates NF-κB and expression of the protumorigenic cytokine IL6.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture

MCF10A, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, SKBR3, and HEK293T cells were obtained from the ATCC. Baby mouse kidney (BMK) cells were obtained from Dr. Eileen White's laboratory (Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ), and human mammary epithelial (HMLE) cells were obtained from Dr. Robert Weinberg's laboratory (Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA). All cell lines have been tested and authenticated as bacteria and Mycoplasma free following the ATCC's instructions on a routine basis within 6 months of experiments.

Retroviral and lentiviral infection

For retroviral infections, the three plasmid system (gene of interest + helper virus + VSVG at the ratio of 4:3:1) was used to generate virus particles after transfection into HEK 293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Filtered viral supernatant along with 10 μg/mL polybrene (Sigma) was used to infect the target cells. Lentiviral infection was carried using the above-mentioned protocol by replacing the helper virus with the ΔR8.91 plasmid.

IL6 ELISA, conditioned medium, and neutralization experiment

The concentration of IL6 secreted into the media was measured using IL6 ELISA Kit (R&D Systems; D6050), as per the manufacturer's instructions.

Subcellular fractionation

Subcellular fractionation was carried out using the subcellular proteome extraction kit (Calbiochem). The fractions were quantified using the BCA assay, and equal amount of protein was then used for precipitation using four times the volume of ice-cold acetone. The samples were incubated for 120 minutes at −20°C and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The pellets were air-dried for 10 minutes and resuspended in 2× SDS sample buffer and boiled at 95°C for 5 minutes. The proteins in the cytosolic and nuclear fractions were then detected by Western blotting.

Luciferase reporter assay

The Dual-Luciferase Activity Kit (Promega E1910) was used to examine the luciferase activity. The luciferase assay is performed following the common protocols. The NF-κB binding site of IL6 promoter was fused to a luciferase reporter gene.

Wound-healing assay

Equal number of vector and SCCA1-expressing cells were plated and allowed to grow to subconfluency. Two perpendicular wounds were made with the help of western loading tips across the culture dish, washed three times to remove cell debris, and imaged 6 hours later at the junction of the wound. The cell front was marked out and the area of the gap was measured using the NIS elements software (Nikon Instruments Inc.).

Soft agar assay

Cells (5 × 104) were resuspended in 1.5-mL MCF10A complete media with 0.5% Noble agarose and overlaid onto 1.5-mL complete medium with 0.7% agarose in each well of a 6-well plate in triplicates. After 3 weeks, colonies larger than 100 μm were counted.

Orthotopic mouse tumor experiment and SCCA1 conditional transgenic mice

Female beige nude XID mice (Hsd:NIHS-Lystbg-JFoxn1nuBtkxid), ages 6 to 8 weeks, were obtained from the Harlan Laboratories. SCCA1 knockin transgenic mice with 129Ola/C57Bl/6 mixed background were developed by Genoway. Mice were housed and monitored at the Division of Laboratory Animal Resources at Stony Brook University (Stony Brook, NY). All experimental procedures and protocols were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee.

Image processing and densitometry measurements

Images captured by deconvolution microscope were viewed and processed by AxioVision LE image browser. Images were processed in Adobe Photoshop to enhance the brightness and contrast. Densitometry of immunoblot bands was determined by the ImageJ software.

Statistical analysis

The longitudinal data analyses were performed to assess the growth curves under different treatments. The Fisher exact test was used to test the difference between tumor incidence rates in two groups. The independent two-sample and one sample t tests were used to make comparisons between groups and to evaluate whether fold changes are different from one, respectively. The analyses were carried out using PROC MIXED, PROC FREQ, PROC MEANS, and PROC TTEST in the SAS 9.4 (SAS institute). Statistical significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Additional details can be found in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Results

SCCA1 expression results in EMT-associated oncogenic transformation

On the basis of our recent report that SCCA1 is associated with poorly differentiated high-grade breast carcinoma (11), we chose to study the biologic function of SCCA1 in the non-neoplastic human mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A that has a low level of endogenous SCCA1 (11). Interestingly, ectopic expression of SCCA1 in MCF10A cells led to morphologic changes from a cobblestone-like monolayer to a dispersed spindle-shaped morphology that resembles epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT; Fig. 1A). This is reminiscent of the EMT-like changes in HepG2, a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, upon SCCA1 overexpression (19). Consistent with the EMT-like morphologic change, a change of transcriptional profile that included downregulation of E-cadherin (CDH1), EpCam (EPCAM), and claudin4 (CLDN4), as well as upregulation of Zeb1 (ZEB1), vimentin (VIM), and fibronectin1 (FN1), was observed in SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells (Fig. 1B). The decreased E-cadherin and increased vimentin were also observed at the protein level by immunofluorescence (Fig. 1C) and immunoblotting (Fig. 1D). It is important to note that the morphologic changes induced by SCCA in MCF10A cells did not occur instantaneously, rather at approximately 2 weeks of continued passaging, accompanied by a progressive loss of E-cadherin and the reciprocal gain of vimentin (Fig. 1D). This is consistent with the notion that EMT is a multistep progressive event (20). Importantly, two catalytic-inactive mutants of SCCA1, the F352A point mutant that has decreased protease-inhibitory activity (21), and the SCCA1 Δ340–345 hinge deletion mutant that renders the RSL inflexible, and therefore incapable of protease inhibition (22), failed to induce the EMT-like changes with regard to the expression levels of E-cadherin and vimentin (Fig. 1E) and cell morphology (Fig. 1F), indicating that the EMT-promoting function requires the antiprotease activity of SCCA1.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Ectopic expression of SCCA1 leads to EMT-like phenotype that is dependent on its protease-inhibitory activity. A–D, MCF10A cells were retrovirally infected with vector control or Flag-SCCA1 and continuously passaged. A, at passage #8, phase-contrast images were taken. B, at passage #8, total RNA was analyzed for indicated genes via qRT-PCR that was normalized against that in vector control cells. Data shown are the mean fold change SEM of two independent experiments performed in triplicates. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001. C, at passage #8, immunofluorescence was performed for E-cadherin and vimentin, and counterstained with DAPI. Images were taken by a deconvolution fluorescence microscope. Note the loss of cell surface E-cadherin and increase in vimentin expression in SCCA1-expressing cells. D, whole-cell lysates were harvested at indicated passage numbers and analyzed by immunoblotting. Right, the expression level of E-cadherin and vimentin in SCCA1-expressing cells, which were analyzed by densitometry and normalized to that of passage #1. E and F, MCF10A cells stably expressing indicated SCCA1 mutants were analyzed by immunoblotting (E), and the phase-contrast images were taken (F).

EMT is functionally associated with increased cell mobility and oncogenic transformation. Indeed, expression of SCCA1 in MCF10A cells conferred increased wound closure associated with individually scattered cells at the migratory front (Fig. 2A). These cells were also resistant to cell death induced by loss of adherence (anoikis; Fig. 2B), and displayed colony formation in soft agar (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, while MCF10A cells are dependent on growth factors and hormones [epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin, hydrocortisone, and cholera toxin], SCCA1 expression rendered them independent of EGF (Fig. 2D) and enabled them to proliferate even when deprived of all four hormonal factors (Supplementary Fig. S1). The independence of EGF was accompanied by increased steady-state levels of phospho-ERK and phospho-Akt, which did not decrease upon EGF deprivation (Fig. 2E). We then examined the tumor-promoting function of SCCA1 in an orthotopic mouse tumor setting by injecting SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells into the mammary fat pad of the immunocompromised XID mice. Although MCF10A cells are nontumorigenic, 9 out of 9 mice implanted with SCCA1-expressing cells developed tumors as shown by GFP imaging (Fig. 3A and B) where the ectopic expression of SCCA1 was confirmed by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 3C). Taken together, our results indicate that SCCA1 can promote an EMT-like phenotype and oncogenic transformation in a manner that is dependent on its antiprotease activity.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Ectopic expression of SCCA1 in MCF10A cells leads to oncogenic transformation. A, vector and SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells were assessed by the wound-healing assay 6 hours after the wound scratch on cell culture monolayer. Representative images are shown. Wound closure was quantified by the percentage change in cell migration. Data shown are the mean of two independent experiments performed in triplicates ± SEM. **, P < 0.01. B, indicated cells were cultured in nonadherence culture dishes for indicated periods of time. Cell viability was measured by propidium iodide exclusion. Data shown are the mean ± SD of an experiment performed in triplicate. Error bars are too small to be visible compared with the physical size of the symbol. ***, P < 0.001. C, cells were cultured in soft agar for 3 weeks. Images of cell colonies were taken. Shown is the average number of colony spheres ≥ 100 μm per field from triplicate experiment + SD. Five randomly selected fields were counted for each replicate. D, cells were cultured in complete or EGF-deprived medium. Relative cell growth was measured by crystal violet staining and normalized to that of the cells at time zero. Data shown are the mean ± SD of two experiments measured in triplicate. ***, P < 0.001. E, cells were cultured in EGF-deprived medium for indicated times and analyzed by immunoblotting. The densitometric ratios of pERK/tERK and pAKT/tAKT are normalized to that of vector cells at time zero.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

SCCA1 promotes orthotopic breast tumor formation. MCF10A cells (7.5 × 105) expressing either GFP alone (n = 5) or GFP plus SCCA1 (n = 9) were implanted into the mammary fat pad of NOD/SCID mice. A, mice were imaged for tumor formation 60 days after implantation. B, the formation of palpable tumors are summarized. Significance was judged on the basis of the Fischer exact test. **, P < 0.01. C, tumors were sectioned and stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; top) or by IHC for SCCA (bottom).

SCCA1 expression induces IL6 expression

Because the SCCA1-expressing cells displayed an EMT-like phenotype, EGF independence, and oncogenic transformation (Figs. 1 and 2), we speculated that SCCA1 might promote the expression of autocrine factors that are implicated in EMT and/or EGFR signaling and oncogenic transformation. We performed quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to determine the expression of well-characterized EMT-associated factors including transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), interleukin-6 (IL6), IL8, IL1β, and (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1; refs. 23–26), as well as the EGF family members EGF, TGFA, heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HBEGF), amphiregulin (AREG), betacellulin (BTC), and epiregulin (EPR; ref. 27). Among these, IL6 transcription was significantly upregulated in SCCA1-expressing cells (Fig. 4A). Correlating with the increased IL6 transcript level, a dramatically increased amount of IL6 was detected in the culture medium of SCCA1-expressing cells (Fig. 4B). The secreted IL6 is functionally active because the culture medium collected from SCCA1-expressing, but not vector control cells, induced STAT3 phosphorylation, a known downstream consequence of IL6 signaling, and this effect was abrogated when the conditioned medium was preincubated with an IL6-blocking antibody (Fig. 4C). It is important to note that a slight, yet apparent, upregulation of IL6 transcript was detected in the early passages post-SCCA1 expression, which progressively increased in subsequent passages, resulting in over a 100-fold elevation (Supplementary Fig. S2). Silencing IL6 at the early-passage post-SCCA1 expression led to a drastic increase in E-cadherin expression at both the transcript and protein levels (Fig. 4D–F), delayed the change to spindle-like morphology (Fig. 4G), and decreased proliferation (Fig. 4H). These results, while they do not rule out the possible involvement of other cytokines, indicate that expression of SCCA1 leads to increased IL6 production, which is likely a causative factor rather than the consequence of the SCCA-induced EMT-like phenotype and cell transformation.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

SCCA1 promotes IL6 expression by activating NF-κB. A, total RNA isolated from vector control or SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells were analyzed for the expression of indicated hormonal ligands by qRT-PCR. Data shown are the mean transcript level normalized to that of vector control cells + SD of triplicate experiment. *, EGF was below detectable level. B, cell culture medium of vector control and SCCA1-expressing cells from overnight cultures was collected and measured for the level of secreted IL6 by ELISA. *, the absolute concentration of IL6 in the control cells was below the sensitivity of the kit (3.25 pg/mL). Data shown are the mean + SD of two independent experiments performed in triplicates. C, vector control or SCCA1-expressing cells were cultured in EGF-free medium for 24 hours. The medium from vector control cells was incubated with control IgG and that from SCCA1 cells was incubated with IgG or an IL6 neutralizing antibody. These media were added to EGF-starved MCF10A cells. Whole-cell lysates were collected at indicated times and probed for phospho-STAT3 (Y705) and total STAT3. D–H, SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells at early passage (passage #3) were infected with control (shNTC) and IL6 (shIL6) shRNA for 4 days. D and E, total RNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR for IL6 (D) and E-cadherin (E) transcript levels. Data shown are the average ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *, P < 0.05. F, whole-cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting. G, phase-contrast images of the cell culture was taken. H, relative cell proliferation was determined by crystal violet staining. Data shown are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments in duplicates. ***, P < 0.001. I, indicated cells were transfected with the NF-κB luciferase reporter and a Renilla luciferase construct. Twenty-four hours after transfection, NF-κB luciferase activity was calculated by normalizing against the Renilla luciferase activity. Data shown are a representative graph of three independent experiments performed in triplicates, showing the mean + SD. ****, P < 0.0001. J, indicated cells were subjected to subcellular fractionation. The cytosol (C) and nuclear (N) fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting. K, left, cells were treated with either DMSO or 5 μmol/L BAY-117082 for 4 hours. Right, SCCA1-expressing cells were retrovirally infected with vector control or IκBαM (S32A, S36A) for 4 days. Expression of IκBαM was verified by immunoblotting. IL6 transcript level was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. ****, P < 0.0001. L and M, SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells cultured in nonadherent culture dish, in the presence of DMSO or 5 μmol/L BAY-117082, for 4 days. phase-contrast image of the cell culture was taken (L) and indicated proteins were probed by immunoblotting (M).

SCCA1-induced IL6 expression is mediated by the activation of NF-κB

Expression of IL6 is largely driven by the NF-κB transcription factors, which have been shown to be essential for EMT in breast cancer (28, 29). Because we detected increased IL6 expression in SCCA1-expressing cells, we determined whether SCCA1 could promote the activation of NF-κB. Indeed, a significant increase of NF-κB activity was detected in SCCA1-expressing cells using an NF-κB luciferase reporter assay (Fig. 4I), which was accompanied by a marked increase of nuclear RelA/p65 (Fig. 4J). The increased expression of IL6 in SCCA1-expressing cells was abrogated by a pharmacologic inhibitor of NF-κB, BAY11-7082, at a concentration tolerated by the parental MCF10A cells (24), and by the ectopic expression of the IκBαM (S32A, S36A) super-repressor mutant (Fig. 4K). Accordingly, treatment with BAY11-7082 resulted in the abrogation of anchorage-independent sphere formation (Fig. 4L) and increased apoptosis (Fig. 4M) in SCCA1-transformed cells. These results indicate that activation of NF-κB plays an essential role in SCCA1-mediated IL6 production and cell transformation.

SCCA1 induces proinflammatory signaling by activating a low-level chronic UPR

We have recently reported that expression of SCCA1, through its protease-inhibitory activity, leads to impaired lysosomal and proteasomal protein turnover (13). This impaired protein degradation caused by elevated SCCA1 expression is nonlethal and may lead to UPR that has been implicated in proinflammatory response in numerous human diseases including cancer (30). Hence, we speculated that SCCA1 could promote NF-κB activation and subsequently IL6 production by inducing a nonlethal, yet prolonged, UPR.

There are three arms of the UPR signaling pathway that are mediated by PERK, ATF6α, and IRE1α/β (31). It is generally accepted that while the three arms are closely interconnected, each of them has predominant molecular signatures: activation of PERK leads to increased translation of ATF4 transcriptional factor and its transcriptional targets such as CHOP; activation of the ATF6α arm is characterized by the proteolytic cleavage of the 90-kDa full-length pro-form of ATF6α into an N-terminal 50-kDa fragments (ATF6α-p50) and a 36-kDa fragment (ATF6α-p36); and activation of IRE1 leads to the splicing of XBP1 mRNA (32, 33).

Activation of the PERK arm of UPR was detected as SCCA1-expressing cells displayed a slight increase in ATF4 expression, which was further enhanced upon treatment with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-inducer tunicamycin (Fig. 5A). The ATF6 arm was also apparent because SCCA1-expressing cells displayed an elevated ATF6α-p50 (Fig. 5A). In addition, CHOP, a synergistic transcriptional target of ATF4 and ATF6 (34), was more robustly induced by tunicamycin in SCCA1-expressing cells (Fig. 5A). Both ATF6α-p50 and ATF6α-p36 translocate to the perinuclear and nuclear regions where p50 is believed to function as a transcription factor (35) while the function of p36 remains unclear (36). An increased nuclear and perinuclear ATF6α was detected by subcellular fractionation (Fig. 5B) and immunofluorescence (Fig. 5C) in SCCA1-expressing cells. Furthermore, the elevated ATF6α transcriptional activity was revealed by the induction of its transcriptional target the unspliced form of XBP1 (XBP1u; Fig. 5D), which was distinguished from the spliced form XBP1s by restriction digestion with PstI that cuts XBP1u but not XBP1s (37). With regard to the IRE1 arm, SCCA1-expressing cells exhibited a decreased basal level of spliced XBP1s (Fig. 5D and E). This supports our notion that SCCA1 induces a prolonged low-level UPR, which has been shown to suppress the IRE1α signaling (38). Moreover, upon tunicamycin treatment, the SCCA1-expressing cells were able to convert this increased amount of XBP1u to XBP1s (Fig. 5E), indicating that while the steady-state level of XBP1 splicing (as an indicator of IRE1α activity) is low, the signaling machinery is still intact in these cells. The UPR-promoting function of SCCA1 is dependent on its protease-inhibitory activity as the SCCA1 F352A and SCCA1Δ340–345 inactive mutants did not alter the levels of ATF6α-p50 (Supplementary Fig. S3). These data indicate that increased SCCA1 expression leads to a chronic UPR with the activation of the PERK and ATF6 arms and slight inhibition of the IRE1 arm.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

SCCA1 induces chronic UPR that is essential for IL6 production and transformation. A, vector control or SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells were treated with 5 μmol/L tunicamycin and analyzed by immunoblotting. B, cells were subjected to subcellular fractionation. The cytosol (C) and nuclear (N) fractions were analyzed by immunoblotting. C, cells were probed for ATF6α by immunofluorescence and counterstained with DAPI. Images were taken by a deconvolution fluorescence microscope. D, primers across the splice junction of XBP1 were used to amplify XBP1 by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The PCR product was divided into two halves. One was subjected to PstI digestion and the other was not, and then resolved on an agarose gel. PCR of GAPDH was used as a control for equal amplification. Note that SCCA1 cells had increased amount of XBP1u and decreased XBP1 splicing. E, vector and SCCA1-expressing cells were treated with 5 μg/mL tunicamycin for indicated times. XBP1 transcript was detected by semi-qPCR. F–N, SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells were lentivirally infected with short hairpins of control (shNTC) and PERK (F–H), ATF6α (I–K), or XBP1 (L–N). Cells were harvested 4 days later and qRT-PCR was performed for the transcript level PERK, ATF6α, IL6, and immunoblotting for XBP1. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Relative cell growth was determined by crystal violet staining normalized to the reading of cells at day 1 (G, J, and M). Significance judged by longitudinal data analysis was *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 for G and J, and nonsignificant for M. Cells were cultured in suspension for 10 days. Phase-contrast images of cell spheres were taken (H, K, and N).

Next, to determine whether activation of PERK and ATF6α are critical for SCCA1-mediated IL6 expression and cell transformation, we silenced PERK or ATF6α in SCCA1 cells. Silencing either PERK or ATF6α led to downregulation of IL6, impaired cell proliferation, and decreased anchorage-independent sphere formation in SCCA1-expressing MCF10A cells (Fig. 5F–K). In contrast, silencing XBP1 led to an increase of IL6 and no decrease in cell proliferation or sphere formation (Fig. 5L–N). Similarly, silencing PERK and ATF6α in MDA-MB-231 cells with the endogenous level of SCCA1 also led to decreased IL6 expression and reduced cell proliferation (Supplementary Fig. S4A–S4D). The specific role of SCCA1 in mediating UPR, IL6 production, and transformation was further tested by silencing the overexpressed SCCA1 in MCF10A cells (Supplementary Fig. S5A–S5C), as well as endogenous SCCA1 in MDA-MB-231 cells (Supplementary Fig. S5D–S5F) and MDA-MB-468 cells (Supplementary Fig. S5G–S5I), which resulted in decreased expression of ATF4, IL6, and cell proliferation.

Taken together, the above data indicate that elevated SCCA1 expression leads to IL6 production and oncogenic transformation by upregulating a nonlethal level of UPR in mammary epithelial cells. The generality of this notion is strengthened by further observations that overexpression of SCCA1 led to increased IL6 production and UPR response in the BMK epithelial cells (Supplementary Fig. S6A–S6C; ref. 39), in HMLE cell line (Supplementary Fig. S6D and S6E), and in human breast cancer cell line SKBR3 (Supplementary Fig. S6F and S6G).

SCCA1 alters UPR and inflammatory conditions in vivo

To further study the role of SCCA1 in affecting UPR and tumorigenesis in vivo, we generated a conditional SCCA1 transgenic mouse strain with a 129Ola/C57Bl/6 mixed background. The human SCCA1 open reading frame cDNA was cloned into the housekeeping Hprt gene located on the X-chromosome. A stop cassette flanked by LoxP sites was placed upstream of SCCA1 to allow for Cre-specific tissue expression of SCCA1 (LSL-SCCA1; Fig. 6A). The LSL-SCCA1 mice were bred to the MMTV-Cre mice to induce SCCA1 expression in mammary glands, which was confirmed by immunoblotting and IHC (Fig. 6B and C). The SCCA1-expressing mice were fertile, sustained pregnancies to term, produced viable offspring, and displayed no apparent defects in ductal morphogenesis, indicating that elevated expression of SCCA1 is not sufficient to drive mammary tumorigenesis by itself. Because our earlier results showed that SCCA1 can promote orthotopic tumor development in MCF10A cell line, which harbors loss of p19Arf tumor-suppressor gene, we are currently investigating the role of SCCA1 in tumorigenesis in spontaneous mouse tumor models with loss of tumor-suppressor genes including the p19Arf flox/flox model (40). Separately, as our above results also showed that SCCA1 can promote chronic UPR and IL6 production, we bred the LSL-SCCA1 mice to the MMTV-neu mice (with FVB background; ref 41) to determine whether expression of SCCA1 can modulate tumor microenvironment and accelerate tumorigenesis. We chose the MMTV-neu model because it has a relatively long tumor latency of 7 to 14 months with 50% incidence. A total of 8 neu+;SCCA+ mice and 10 neu+ littermate control female mice were generated. Four mice from each group developed palpable tumors. The average latency of tumor formation was 407 days and 551 days for neu+;SCCA+ and neu+ only mice, respectively (P = 0.24). The prolonged tumor latency is reminiscent of that of the F1 virgin mice of the FVB and B6 crossing (42). Metastatic tumors were not observed in these mice at endpoint (tumor size, 300–500 mm3). We were able to collect eight tumors for histology and four tumors for Western blot analysis (two tumors from each group). Strikingly, when compared with neu+ only tumors, all neu+;SCCA1+ tumor cells invaded the basement membrane into the stromal tissue (Fig. 6D). The SCCA+ tumors also displayed elevated UPR indicated by increased expression of ATF4 and ATF6α-p50 (Fig. 6E), as well as increased intratumoral IL6 expression and the infiltration of F4/80-positive cells (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that while SCCA1 is not able to accelerate tumor development in the MMTV-neu background, it can clearly alter the tumor microenvironment and increase the potential of tumor invasiveness. Further characterization of the role of SCCA1 in tumorigenesis in tumor models with other genetic lesions is under way.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

SCCA1 induces UPR and inflammatory conditions in MMTV-neu mice. A, schematic representation of the LoxP-Stop-LoxP-Flag-SCCA1 (LSL-SCCA1) conditional knockin strategy. B and C, LSL-SCCA1 mice were bred to MMTV-Cre mice. SCCA1 expression in mammary gland epithelium of control (LSL-SCCA1; Cre−) or LSL-SCCA1; Cre+ mice was detected by Western blot analysis (B) and IHC (C). D–F, LSL-SCCA1 mice were bred to MMTV-Cre, then to MMTV-neu mice. Tumors were isolated from neu+ only (n = 4) or neu+; SCCA1+ (n = 4) littermates at endpoints were compared. D, representative images of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and SCCA1 IHC are shown. Hematoxylin and eosin staining shows the junction areas of tumor and normal tissues. Note that in neu+;SCCA1+ tumors, tumor cells had invaded the basement membrane into surrounding stroma. E, total tumor lysates were made and indicated protein levels were probed by Western blot analyses. A nonspecific (n.s.) band and Ponseau S staining were used as loading controls. Densitometric ratio of respective proteins to loading control is normalized to that of neu+ mouse #1. F, IHC staining for IL6 and F4/80 in neu+ only (n = 4) and neu+;SCCA1+ (n = 4) tumors. For the quantification of F4/80 staining, three or four most intensive areas (magnification, ×200) from each tumor of all tumors were photographed. The number of positive cells from each picture was analyzed using the ImageJ software. Shown are representative images. The graph shows the average number of positive cells from each tumor section + SEM. *, P < 0.05.

Discussion

In this study, we report that an intracellular serine/cysteine protease inhibitor, SCCA1, promotes the production of IL6 by inducing chronic UPR and subsequent activation of NF-κB. This leads to an EMT-like phenotype and oncogenic transformation in the nontumorigenic mammary epithelial cell line MCF10A. Silencing of the ectopically expressed SCCA1 in MCF10A cells and the endogenous SCCA1 in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells leads to decreased UPR, IL6 signaling, and halted cell proliferation. We also show that overexpression of SCCA1 in the neu-induced mammary tumors resulted in increased UPR, IL6 expression, and proinflammatory condition.

Our study uncovers a novel protumorigenic role of SCCA1 and helps to explain the association between elevated SCCA1 expression and poorly differentiated and more aggressive human malignancies, namely by inducing IL6 autocrine signaling and EMT-like phenotype. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that other cytokines/growth factors may also be involved, our data strongly indicate that IL6 autocrine signaling plays a critical role. This is in line with recent literature showing that IL6 acts to sustain the positive feedback loop to achieve chronic inflammation (24, 25), and that cell autonomous inflammation mediated by IL6 is a key component in driving EMT that have been shown to account for oncogenic transformation and tumor cell de-differentiation (43, 44).

Our work also provides SCCA1 as a molecular signature that connects protein homeostasis, UPR, NF-κB activation, and tumorigenesis. We have previously reported that expression of SCCA1 leads to a suppression of both lysosomal and proteasomal protein turnover, in a manner that requires its protease-inhibitory activity (13). Although the precise mechanism underlying this SCCA1-mediated blockade of protein turnover remains to be determined, our finding is in line with a recent report that the cathepsin L-deficient cells display impaired lysosomal turnover, accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins and protein aggregates, and disrupted ER homeostasis (45). It is conceivable that the blockade of protein turnover can lead to UPR, which we show here promotes protumorigenic IL6 production. Our work hence establishes a case in which cell intrinsic blockade of protein turnover promotes EMT and tumorigenesis via UPR, which has been implicated in cell de-differentiation and EMT (46, 47), as well as for tumorigenesis in animal models of breast cancer (48, 49).

The UPR-inducing and protumorigenic function of SCCA1 suggests it may be a predictor and target for therapy. We previously reported that while SCCA1 protects cells from lysosomal disruption resulting from DNA-alkylating damage and hypotonic shock, it sensitizes cells to ER stressors (13), suggesting a therapeutic opportunity of using proteotoxic agents, such as proteasome inhibitors, to treat cancers with elevated SCCA1. In addition, as we show here that the antiprotease activity of SCCA1 is essential for it protumorigenic function, targeting the protease-inhibitory function of SCCA1 may be another vital therapeutic approach.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: N. Sheshadri, E. Ullman, E.I. Chen, J. Zhang, W.-X. Zong

Development of methodology: N. Sheshadri, E.I. Chen, J. Zhang

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): N. Sheshadri, J.M. Catanzaro, A.J. Bott, E. Ullman, E.I. Chen, J.-A. Pan, H.C. Crawford, J. Zhang

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): N. Sheshadri, A.J. Bott, E.I. Chen, S. Wu, J. Zhang, W.-X. Zong

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: N. Sheshadri, E.I. Chen, S. Wu, J. Zhang, W.-X. Zong

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): N. Sheshadri

Study supervision: N. Sheshadri, W.-X. Zong

Other (contributing animal work including characterization of the phenotype of animal, endpoint tumor collecting, fixation, processing, embedding, and the H&E and IHC staining for tumor sections): Y. Sun

Grant Support

This work was supported by grants from NIH (R01CA129536 and R01GM97355) and the Carol Baldwin Breast Cancer Research Foundation to WXZ. J.M. Catanzaro was supported by the NCI T32 training grant (T32CA009176). J. Zhang was supported by NIHR01-NS064090 and a VA merit award.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Yongjun Fan and Nancy Reich for insightful discussions and critical reading, Drs. Nancy Reich, Laurie Krug, and Jian Cao for reagents.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received March 20, 2014.
  • Revision received July 31, 2014.
  • Accepted August 4, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Schick C,
    2. Pemberton PA,
    3. Shi GP,
    4. Kamachi Y,
    5. Cataltepe S,
    6. Bartuski AJ,
    7. et al.
    Cross-class inhibition of the cysteine proteinases cathepsins K, L, and S by the serpin squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1: a kinetic analysis. Biochemistry 1998;37:5258–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Suminami Y,
    2. Kishi F,
    3. Sekiguchi K,
    4. Kato H
    . Squamous cell carcinoma antigen is a new member of the serine protease inhibitors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991;181:51–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Kato H,
    2. Torigoe T
    . Radioimmunoassay for tumor antigen of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 1977;40:1621–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kato H
    . Expression and function of squamous cell carcinoma antigen. Anticancer Res 1996;16:2149–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Vidalino L,
    2. Doria A,
    3. Quarta S,
    4. Zen M,
    5. Gatta A,
    6. Pontisso P
    . SERPINB3, apoptosis and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev 2009;9:108–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Katagiri C,
    2. Nakanishi J,
    3. Kadoya K,
    4. Hibino T
    . Serpin squamous cell carcinoma antigen inhibits UV-induced apoptosis via suppression of c-JUN NH2-terminal kinase. J Cell Biol 2006;172:983–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Murakami A,
    2. Suminami Y,
    3. Hirakawa H,
    4. Nawata S,
    5. Numa F,
    6. Kato H
    . Squamous cell carcinoma antigen suppresses radiation-induced cell death. Br J Cancer 2001;84:851–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Suminami Y,
    2. Nagashima S,
    3. Murakami A,
    4. Nawata S,
    5. Gondo T,
    6. Hirakawa H,
    7. et al.
    Suppression of a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)-related serpin, SCC antigen, inhibits tumor growth with increased intratumor infiltration of natural killer cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:1776–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Suminami Y,
    2. Nagashima S,
    3. Vujanovic NL,
    4. Hirabayashi K,
    5. Kato H,
    6. Whiteside TL
    . Inhibition of apoptosis in human tumour cells by the tumour-associated serpin, SCC antigen-1. Br J Cancer 2000;82:981–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Turato C,
    2. Buendia MA,
    3. Fabre M,
    4. Redon MJ,
    5. Branchereau S,
    6. Quarta S,
    7. et al.
    Over-expression of SERPINB3 in hepatoblastoma: a possible insight into the genesis of this tumour? Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1219–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Catanzaro JM,
    2. Guerriero JL,
    3. Liu J,
    4. Ullman E,
    5. Sheshadri N,
    6. Chen JJ,
    7. et al.
    Elevated expression of squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) is associated with human breast carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e19096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Collie-Duguid ES,
    2. Sweeney K,
    3. Stewart KN,
    4. Miller ID,
    5. Smyth E,
    6. Heys SD
    . SerpinB3, a new prognostic tool in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;132:807–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ullman E,
    2. Pan JA,
    3. Zong WX
    . Squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1 promotes caspase-8-mediated apoptosis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress while inhibiting necrosis induced by lysosomal injury. Mol Cell Biol 2011;31:2902–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Kaufman RJ
    . The impact of the unfolded protein response on human disease. J Cell Biol 2012;197:857–67.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lee AS
    . Glucose-regulated proteins in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14:263–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Clarke R,
    2. Cook KL,
    3. Hu R,
    4. Facey CO,
    5. Tavassoly I,
    6. Schwartz JL,
    7. et al.
    Endoplasmic reticulum stress, the unfolded protein response, autophagy, and the integrated regulation of breast cancer cell fate. Cancer Res 2012;72:1321–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Verfaillie T,
    2. Garg AD,
    3. Agostinis P
    . Targeting ER stress induced apoptosis and inflammation in cancer. Cancer Lett 2013;332:249–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Diehl JA,
    2. Fuchs SY,
    3. Koumenis C
    . The cell biology of the unfolded protein response. Gastroenterology 2011;141:38–41, e1–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Quarta S,
    2. Vidalino L,
    3. Turato C,
    4. Ruvoletto M,
    5. Calabrese F,
    6. Valente M,
    7. et al.
    SERPINB3 induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J Pathol 2010;221:343–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jordan NV,
    2. Johnson GL,
    3. Abell AN
    . Tracking the intermediate stages of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in epithelial stem cells and cancer. Cell Cycle 2011;10:2865–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Schick C,
    2. Bromme D,
    3. Bartuski AJ,
    4. Uemura Y,
    5. Schechter NM,
    6. Silverman GA
    . The reactive site loop of the serpin SCCA1 is essential for cysteine proteinase inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:13465–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Turato C,
    2. Calabrese F,
    3. Biasiolo A,
    4. Quarta S,
    5. Ruvoletto M,
    6. Tono N,
    7. et al.
    SERPINB3 modulates TGF-beta expression in chronic liver disease. Lab Invest 2010;90:1016–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Miettinen PJ,
    2. Ebner R,
    3. Lopez AR,
    4. Derynck R
    . TGF-beta induced transdifferentiation of mammary epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells: involvement of type I receptors. J Cell Biol 1994;127:2021–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Iliopoulos D,
    2. Hirsch HA,
    3. Struhl K
    . An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell 2009;139:693–706.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Korkaya H,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Wicha MS
    . Regulation of cancer stem cells by cytokine networks: attacking cancer's inflammatory roots. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:6125–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Scheel C,
    2. Eaton EN,
    3. Li SH,
    4. Chaffer CL,
    5. Reinhardt F,
    6. Kah KJ,
    7. et al.
    Paracrine and autocrine signals induce and maintain mesenchymal and stem cell states in the breast. Cell 2011;145:926–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Yarden Y
    . The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer. signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Eur J Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 4):S3–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Huber MA,
    2. Azoitei N,
    3. Baumann B,
    4. Grunert S,
    5. Sommer A,
    6. Pehamberger H,
    7. et al.
    NF-kappaB is essential for epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis in a model of breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest 2004;114:569–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chua HL,
    2. Bhat-Nakshatri P,
    3. Clare SE,
    4. Morimiya A,
    5. Badve S,
    6. Nakshatri H
    . NF-kappaB represses E-cadherin expression and enhances epithelial to mesenchymal transition of mammary epithelial cells: potential involvement of ZEB-1 and ZEB-2. Oncogene 2007;26:711–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Garg AD,
    2. Kaczmarek A,
    3. Krysko O,
    4. Vandenabeele P,
    5. Krysko DV,
    6. Agostinis P
    . ER stress-induced inflammation: does it aid or impede disease progression? Trends Mol Med 2012;18:589–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Zhang K,
    2. Kaufman RJ
    . From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response. Nature 2008;454:455–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Walter P,
    2. Ron D
    . The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 2011;334:1081–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hetz C
    . The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012;13:89–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Okada T,
    2. Yoshida H,
    3. Akazawa R,
    4. Negishi M,
    5. Mori K
    . Distinct roles of activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) in transcription during the mammalian unfolded protein response. Biochem J 2002;366:585–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Haze K,
    2. Yoshida H,
    3. Yanagi H,
    4. Yura T,
    5. Mori K
    . Mammalian transcription factor ATF6 is synthesized as a transmembrane protein and activated by proteolysis in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Biol Cell 1999;10:3787–99.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Mao W,
    2. Fukuoka S,
    3. Iwai C,
    4. Liu J,
    5. Sharma VK,
    6. Sheu SS,
    7. et al.
    Cardiomyocyte apoptosis in autoimmune cardiomyopathy: mediated via endoplasmic reticulum stress and exaggerated by norepinephrine. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;293:H1636–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Calfon M,
    2. Zeng H,
    3. Urano F,
    4. Till JH,
    5. Hubbard SR,
    6. Harding HP,
    7. et al.
    IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. Nature 2002;415:92–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Lin JH,
    2. Li H,
    3. Yasumura D,
    4. Cohen HR,
    5. Zhang C,
    6. Panning B,
    7. et al.
    IRE1 signaling affects cell fate during the unfolded protein response. Science 2007;318:944–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Degenhardt K,
    2. Sundararajan R,
    3. Lindsten T,
    4. Thompson C,
    5. White E
    . Bax and Bak independently promote cytochrome C release from mitochondria. J Biol Chem 2002;277:14127–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Gromley A,
    2. Churchman ML,
    3. Zindy F,
    4. Sherr CJ
    . Transient expression of the Arf tumor suppressor during male germ cell and eye development in Arf-Cre reporter mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:6285–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Guy CT,
    2. Webster MA,
    3. Schaller M,
    4. Parsons TJ,
    5. Cardiff RD,
    6. Muller WJ
    . Expression of the neu protooncogene in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice induces metastatic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:10578–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Rowse GJ,
    2. Ritland SR,
    3. Gendler SJ
    . Genetic modulation of neu proto-oncogene-induced mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 1998;58:2675–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Gao SP,
    2. Mark KG,
    3. Leslie K,
    4. Pao W,
    5. Motoi N,
    6. Gerald WL,
    7. et al.
    Mutations in the EGFR kinase domain mediate STAT3 activation via IL-6 production in human lung adenocarcinomas. J Clin Invest 2007;117:3846–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Sansone P,
    2. Storci G,
    3. Tavolari S,
    4. Guarnieri T,
    5. Giovannini C,
    6. Taffurelli M,
    7. et al.
    IL-6 triggers malignant features in mammospheres from human ductal breast carcinoma and normal mammary gland. J Clin Invest 2007;117:3988–4002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Sun M,
    2. Ouzounian M,
    3. de Couto G,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Yan R,
    6. Fukuoka M,
    7. et al.
    Cathepsin-L ameliorates cardiac hypertrophy through activation of the autophagy-lysosomal dependent protein processing pathways. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2:e000191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Carlson SG,
    3. McBurney D,
    4. Horton WE Jr.
    . Multiple signals induce endoplasmic reticulum stress in both primary and immortalized chondrocytes resulting in loss of differentiation, impaired cell growth, and apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2005;280:31156–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Tanjore H,
    2. Cheng DS,
    3. Degryse AL,
    4. Zoz DF,
    5. Abdolrasulnia R,
    6. Lawson WE,
    7. et al.
    Alveolar epithelial cells undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Biol Chem 2011;286:30972–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Dong D,
    2. Ni M,
    3. Li J,
    4. Xiong S,
    5. Ye W,
    6. Virrey JJ,
    7. et al.
    Critical role of the stress chaperone GRP78/BiP in tumor proliferation, survival, and tumor angiogenesis in transgene-induced mammary tumor development. Cancer Res 2008;68:498–505.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Bobrovnikova-Marjon E,
    2. Grigoriadou C,
    3. Pytel D,
    4. Zhang F,
    5. Ye J,
    6. Koumenis C,
    7. et al.
    PERK promotes cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth by limiting oxidative DNA damage. Oncogene 2010;29:3881–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 74 (21)
November 2014
Volume 74, Issue 21
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SCCA1/SERPINB3 Promotes Oncogenesis and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition via the Unfolded Protein Response and IL6 Signaling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
SCCA1/SERPINB3 Promotes Oncogenesis and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition via the Unfolded Protein Response and IL6 Signaling
Namratha Sheshadri, Joseph M. Catanzaro, Alex J. Bott, Yu Sun, Erica Ullman, Emily I. Chen, Ji-An Pan, Song Wu, Howard C. Crawford, Jianhua Zhang and Wei-Xing Zong
Cancer Res November 1 2014 (74) (21) 6318-6329; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0798

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
SCCA1/SERPINB3 Promotes Oncogenesis and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition via the Unfolded Protein Response and IL6 Signaling
Namratha Sheshadri, Joseph M. Catanzaro, Alex J. Bott, Yu Sun, Erica Ullman, Emily I. Chen, Ji-An Pan, Song Wu, Howard C. Crawford, Jianhua Zhang and Wei-Xing Zong
Cancer Res November 1 2014 (74) (21) 6318-6329; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0798
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • mtDNA-Oncogene Cross-Talk
  • Alternative NFκB Regulates ALDH+ Ovarian Cancer Cells
  • R-Spondin1/LGR5 Activates TGFβ in Colon Cancer Metastasis
Show more Tumor and Stem Cell Biology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement