Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
A, Distribution and ratio of articles that described KB cells correctly and incorrectly in the period 2000 to 2014. B, Distribution and normalized ratio of articles citing the original KB Correct and KB Incorrect articles between 2002 and 2015. (Data sourced from Thomson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection.)
Additional Files
Supplementary Data
- Supplementary Methods and Table Legends - Contains the Supplementary Methods and the legends to accompany the Supplementary Tables.
- Supplementary Tables - Contains the following Supplementary material: Supplementary Table 1: Examples of KB Terminology Supplementary Table 2: "Correct" Dataset, n=57 Supplementary Table 3: "Incorrect" Dataset, n=574 Supplementary Table 4: Sample articles from "Incorrect" dataset, n=171 Supplementary Table 5: Comparing citation counts Supplementary Table 6: KB Use in Citing Articles Supplementary Table 7: Journal Impact Factors Supplementary Table 8: Journal Subject Areas
Supplementary Data
- Supplementary Methods and Table Legends - Contains the Supplementary Methods and the legends to accompany the Supplementary Tables.
- Supplementary Tables - Contains the following Supplementary material: Supplementary Table 1: Examples of KB Terminology Supplementary Table 2: "Correct" Dataset, n=57 Supplementary Table 3: "Incorrect" Dataset, n=574 Supplementary Table 4: Sample articles from "Incorrect" dataset, n=171 Supplementary Table 5: Comparing citation counts Supplementary Table 6: KB Use in Citing Articles Supplementary Table 7: Journal Impact Factors Supplementary Table 8: Journal Subject Areas
June 2017
Volume 77, Issue 11
Volume 77, Issue 11
Widespread Use of Misidentified Cell Line KB (HeLa): Incorrect Attribution and Its Impact Revealed through Mining the Scientific Literature
Jump to section
Advertisement