Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology

Tumor-Associated Neutrophils and Macrophages Promote Gender Disparity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Zebrafish

Chuan Yan, Qiqi Yang and Zhiyuan Gong
Chuan Yan
1Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
2National University of Singapore Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qiqi Yang
1Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiyuan Gong
1Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
2National University of Singapore Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dbsgzy@nus.edu.sg
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2200 Published March 2017
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Gender disparity in krasV12-induced carcinogenesis. Three-month-old adult zebrafish were treated with 30 μg/mL doxycycline for 7 days and examined by various assays. A, Gross liver morphology of kras+ and fabp+ (control) male and female zebrafish after doxycycline exposure. Male krasV12-expressing liver (green) was significantly enlarged as compared with female krasV12-expressing liver and also to fabp+ male and female livers (red). B, H&E staining of liver sections of doxycycline-treated kras+ and WT male and female zebrafish. Examples of prominent nucleolus and vacuolated cytoplasm are indicated by white and red arrows, respectively. C, Immunofluorescent staining of liver sections of doxycycline-treated kras+ and WT male and female zebrafish with antibody against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; red). D, Quantification of liver tumor histology based on H&E-stained liver sections of doxycycline-treated kras+ male and female zebrafish (n = 10 each group). E, Quantification of proliferating cells based on PCNA staining (n = 10 each group). F, Comparison of gene expression change after krasV12 induction in hepatocytes isolated from doxycycline-treated kras+ and fabp+ males and females. RNA expression of selected genes was determined by RT-qPCR. Fold changes are shown for FACS-isolated krasV12-expressing hepatocytes versus fabp10+ control hepatocytes in both males and females (*, P < 0.05). Scale bars, 3 mm in A and 20 μm in B and C.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Differential responses of neutrophils/macrophages in male and female zebrafish during krasV12-induced carcinogenesis. Three-month-old kras+lyz+, lyz+, kras+mpeg+, and mpeg+ zebrafish were treated with 30 μg/mL doxycycline for 7 days, and liver-infiltrated neutrophils and macrophages were examined for density and gene expression. Representative liver sections of doxycycline-treated male and female kras+lyz+ and lyz+ (control) zebrafish to show neutrophils are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1A and representative liver sections of doxycycline-treated male and female kras+mpeg+ and mpeg+ (control) zebrafish to show macrophages in Supplementary Fig. S1B. A, Neutrophil density in liver sections of doxycycline-treated male and female kras+lyz+ and lyz+ zebrafish (n = 10 each group). B, Macrophage density in liver sections of doxycycline-treated male and female kras+mpeg+ and mpeg+ (n = 10 each group). C and D, Gene expression change after krasV12 induction in TANs (C) and TAMs (D). TANs were isolated from livers of doxycycline-treated kras+lyz+ and lyz+ zebrafish, and TAMs from doxycycline-treated kras+mpeg+ and mpeg+ zebrafish by FACS. RNA expression of selected genes was determined by RT-qPCR. Fold changes are shown for TANs (kras+lyz+) versus naïve neutrophils (lyz+) or TAMs (kras+mpeg+) versus naïve macrophages (mpeg+) for both males and females (*, P < 0.05).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effect of TANs and TAMs on krasV12-induced carcinogenesis in zebrafish larvae. Zebrafish embryos were injected with various morpholino oligonucleotides at 1-cell stage and treated with 30 μg/mL doxycycline for 48 hours from 4 dpf. Liver sizes and neutrophils/macrophages were examined at 6 dpf. A, Gross morphology of morpholino-injected 6-dpf kras+ and WT (control) larvae. KrasV12-expressing livers (indicated by arrows) decreased in size when neutrophils (MO-gcsfr), macrophages (MO-pu.1), or both (MO-gcsfr + MO-pu.1) were depleted. WT livers are demarcated with dotted lines. Scale bars, 200 μm. B, Quantification of 2D liver sizes under different morpholino conditions as shown in A (n > 20 each group). C, Densities of liver-infiltrated neutrophils (left) and macrophages (right). kras+lyz+ and lyz+ (control) larvae were used for neutrophil counting and kras+mpeg+ and mpeg+ (control) larvae used for macrophage counting. D, Quantification of proliferating (left) and apoptotic cells (right) in the liver sections of morpholino-injected and doxycycline-treated kras+ and WT larvae. Proliferation was based on immunofluorescent staining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)+ cells and apoptosis based on immunofluorescent staining of caspase-3+ cells. E, Gene expression changes after krasV12 induction in TANs (left) and TAMs (right). TANs were isolated from kras+lyz+ and lyz+ larvae and TAMs from kras+mpeg+ and mpeg+ larvae. RNA expression of selected genes was determined by RT-qPCR. Fold changes are shown for TANs (kras+lyz+) versus naïve neutrophils (lyz+) or TAMs (kras+mpeg+) versus naïve macrophages (mpeg+; *, P < 0.05).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Differential production of cortisol and induction of Tgfβ1 expression by cortisol in krasV12-expressing livers between genders. Three-month-old zebrafish were treated with 30 μg/mL doxycycline with or without 1 μmol/L of U0126, 10 μg/L of E2, 2 μmol/L mifepristone, or 10 μg/L cortisol for 7 days. The livers were examined for cortisol, Hsd11b, and TgfB1 by immunofluorescent staining and for RNA expression by RT-qPCR. Representative images of immunofluorescent staining of cortisol and Hsd11b on liver sections of kras+ male and female zebrafish in the absence or presence of U0126 or E2 are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4A and S4B, respectively. A, Percentages of cortisol positive hepatocytes are shown. B, Gene expression changes in key cortisol synthesis genes (cyp11a1, cyp17a1, and hsd11b1) in FACS-isolated hepatocytes with krasV12induction in kras+ male fish, kras+ female fish, Kras+ male fish exposed to U0126, and Kras+ male fish exposed to E2. C, Percentages of Hsd11b-positive hepatocytes are shown. Expression of tgfb1 mRNA (D) and protein (E) in hepatocytes after alteration of cortisol levels. In addition to doxycycline treatment, male fish were also treated with mifepristone (mife) and female fish with cortisol (cort). RNA expression was determined by RT-qPCR from FACS-isolated hepatocytes. D, Fold changes of tgfb1 mRNA in krasV12-expressing hepatocytes versus non–krasV12-expressing controls (fabp10+) in both males and females. E, Percentages of Tgfb1 cells based on immunofluorescent staining of Tgfb1 protein (see Supplementary Fig. S4C). n = 10 in each group. *, P < 0.05 in all histograms.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Effects of cortisol on TAN and TAM infiltration in krasV12-expressing livers. Three-month-old kras+, lyz+, kras+lyz+, mpeg+, and kras+mpeg+ zebrafish were treated with 30 μg/mL doxycycline with or without 2 μmol/L mifepristone or 10 mg/L cortisol for 7 days. The livers were examined for neutrophil and macrophage densities as well as for gene expression by RT-qPCR. Liver sections for showing neutrophils and macrophages are shown in Supplementary Fig. S6A and S6B, respectively. Neutrophil (A) and macrophage (B) densities. DsRed- or mCherry-labeled neutrophils and macrophages were counted manually. n = 10 for each group. *, P < 0.05. Gene expression changes after krasV12 induction in TANs (C) and TAMs (D). TANs were isolated from kras+lyz+ and lyz+ livers and TAMs from kras+mpeg+ and mpeg+ livers. Fold changes are shown for TANs (kras+lyz+) versus naïve neutrophils (lyz+) or TAMs (kras+mpeg+) versus naïve macrophages (mpeg+; *, P < 0.05).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Promotion of krasV12-induced carcinogenesis by cortisol. Three-month-old kras+ male and female zebrafish were treated with 30 μg/mL doxycycline with or without 2 μmol/L mifepristone or 10 mg/L cortisol for 7 days. The livers were examined for histology, proliferation, and apoptosis as described earlier. A, Gross morphology. Scale bars, 3 mm. B, H&E staining of liver sections. Scale bars, 20 μm. C, Quantification of tumor histology based on H&E-stained liver sections. n = 10 in each group. D and E, Immunofluorescent staining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) for cell proliferation (D) and caspase-3 for apoptosis (E) in the livers. Scale bar, 20 μm. Quantification of proliferating and apoptotic cells is shown on the right of each panel. n = 10 in each group. *, P < 0.05.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Gender difference in levels of HSD11B, cortisol, and TGFB1 in human liver disease samples. A panel of liver disease samples from human patients was examined for histology by H&E staining and for levels of HSD11B, cortisol, and TGFB1 by antibody staining. These samples were categorized into normal, pre-HCC, and HCC for both males and females. A, H&E staining of human liver disease samples. B–F, IHC staining of antibody against HSD11B (B), cortisol (C), TGFB1 (D), neutrophil elastase (E), and CD68 (F). For cortisol staining in male pre-HCC and HCC groups, both positive and negative samples are shown in C. G, Quantification of the percentages of HSD11B, cortisol, TGFB1, neutrophil elastase (for neutrophil density), and CD68 (for macrophage density)-positive liver cells in pre-HCC and HCC samples. H, Correlations of cortisol to TGFB1, neutrophil elastase, and CD68 in cortisol-positive patients with HCC. *, P < 0.05. Scale bar, 20 μm.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figures 1 through 7 - Supplementary Table S1. Sequences of RT-qPCR primers; Supplementary Figure S1. Representative images for differential responses of neutrophils/macrophages in male and female zebrafish during krasV12-induced carcinogenesis; Supplementary Figure S2. Comparison of gene expression between wild type male and female zebrafish (3 months old) in FACS-isolated neutrophils, macrophages and hepatocytes. Supplementary Figure S3. Manipulation of neutrophil and macrophage differentiation in 6-dpf zebrafish larvae; Supplementary Figure S4. Representative images for differential production of cortisol and induction of Tgfb1 expression by cortisol in krasV12 expressing livers between genders; Supplementary Figure S5. Effect of cortisol on neutrophil and macrophage number in zebrafish larvae; Supplementary Figure S6. Effects of cortisol on TAN and TAM infiltration in krasV12-expressing livers; Supplementary Figure S7. Schematics of possible mechanism of cortisol involved gender disparity in liver tumorigenesis.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 77 (6)
March 2017
Volume 77, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor-Associated Neutrophils and Macrophages Promote Gender Disparity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Zebrafish
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tumor-Associated Neutrophils and Macrophages Promote Gender Disparity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Zebrafish
Chuan Yan, Qiqi Yang and Zhiyuan Gong
Cancer Res March 15 2017 (77) (6) 1395-1407; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2200

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tumor-Associated Neutrophils and Macrophages Promote Gender Disparity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Zebrafish
Chuan Yan, Qiqi Yang and Zhiyuan Gong
Cancer Res March 15 2017 (77) (6) 1395-1407; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2200
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • HIF1α/STK33 Signaling in PDAC Progression
  • TRβ2 Bypasses Rb-Dependent Proliferation in RB1−/− Cells
  • DHHC3 Regulates Breast Tumor Growth In Vivo
Show more Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement