Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Research
Cancer Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Focus on Computer Resources
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Early Career Award
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citations
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Translational Science

VEGFC Antibody Therapy Drives Differentiation of AML

Kim R. Kampen, Frank J.G. Scherpen, Hasan Mahmud, Arja ter Elst, André B. Mulder, Victor Guryev, Han J.M.P. Verhagen, Kim De Keersmaecker, Linda Smit, Steven M. Kornblau and Eveline S.J.M. De Bont
Kim R. Kampen
1Division of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
2Laboratory for Disease Mechanisms in Cancer, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Belgium.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kim.kampen@kuleuven.be edebont@elkerliek.nl
Frank J.G. Scherpen
1Division of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hasan Mahmud
1Division of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arja ter Elst
1Division of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
André B. Mulder
3Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Guryev
4European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Han J.M.P. Verhagen
5Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim De Keersmaecker
2Laboratory for Disease Mechanisms in Cancer, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Belgium.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kim De Keersmaecker
Linda Smit
5Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Kornblau
6Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eveline S.J.M. De Bont
1Division of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kim.kampen@kuleuven.be edebont@elkerliek.nl
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0250 Published October 2018
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

High expression of VEGFC predicts adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We therefore explored VEGFC-targeting efficacy as an AML therapy using a VEGFC mAb. VEGFC antibody therapy enforced myelocytic differentiation of clonal CD34+ AML blasts. Treatment of CD34+ AML blasts with the antibody reduced expansion potential by 30% to 50% and enhanced differentiation via FOXO3A suppression and inhibition of MAPK/ERK proliferative signals. VEGFC antibody therapy also accelerated leukemia cell differentiation in a systemic humanized AML mouse model. Collectively, these results define a regulatory function of VEGFC in CD34+ AML cell fate decisions via FOXO3A and serve as a new potential differentiation therapy for patients with AML.

Significance: These findings reveal VEGFC targeting as a promising new differentiation therapy in AML. Cancer Res; 78(20); 5940–8. ©2018 AACR.

Introduction

VEGFC is one of the VEGF family members with a unique role in lymphangiogenesis as well as in angiogenesis in normal homeostasis and cancer (1–4). VEGFC can bind to kinase insert domain receptor (KDR, i.e., VEGFR-2) and fms-related tyrosine kinase-4 (FLT-4, i.e., VEGFR-3) receptors expressed by vascular endothelial cells, lymphatic endothelial cells, and leukemic blasts (1–3, 5, 6). KDR is expressed extracellular on the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell membrane, intracellular in the cytoplasm and on the nuclear membrane of AML cells, whereas FLT-4 mainly stains positive within the cytoplasm of AML blasts (5–7). This phenomenon implicates that the extrinsic VEGFC/KDR axis is more likely to support AML cells due to the limited availability of FLT-4 in these AML cells.

High VEGFC levels were identified as an independent prognostic factor in AML and associated with decreased complete remission rates and a reduced survival (8). Exogenous VEGFC can protect AML cells from chemotherapy-induced apoptosis (5). We previously showed that endogenous VEGFC expression is associated with decreased drug responsiveness in childhood AML (9). We therefore hypothesized that VEGFC is an important autocrine growth factor involved in CD34+ AML blast maintenance.

Current literature supports an important function for VEGFC in AML progression and therapy resistance (5, 8, 9). Nevertheless, the downstream mechanism of VEGFC signaling in AML blasts is still unknown, and its potential as therapeutic target in AML is an unexplored field of research. Therefore, we set out to investigate the contribution of VEGFC on AML cell functions and the associated downstream signal transduction regulation.

Materials and Methods

AML patient samples

Medical Ethical Committee approved METC 2010.036 and 2013.281, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. After obtaining written-informed consent (according the declaration of Helsinki), patient samples were handled as was previously described (7). Supplementary Table S1 includes patient with AML characteristics as French-American-British (FAB) classification, karyotype, blast (%), VEGFC levels (pg/mL), KDR (%), FLT-4 (%), CD34 (%), and FLT3 mutational status.

Cell lines

THP-1 and OCI AML3 AML cells were obtained from the ATCC (DSMZ), cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Fisher), and supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher) and 10% FCS (Bodinco). MS5 bone marrow stromal feeder layer (a kind gift from J.J. Schuringa from the Department of Experimental Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen). Cell lines were all tested mycoplasma free and approximately 25 times passaged. Cell line karyotypes were regularly tested and were maintained among passages.

Cloning lentiviral vectors

shRNA sequences targeting VEGFC and VEGFR-2/KDR (Supplementary Table S2) were genetically modified into a pLKO1-mCherry vector, and PCR-amplified FOXO3A was cloned into the pRRL-GFP vector. Lentiviral particles were generated by 293T cells using psPAX2, pMD2.G (VSV-G), and FuGENE (Roche).

Flow cytometry

Cells were serum blocked and stained with primary antibodies and secondary antibodies (Supplementary Table S2). Intracellular stainings were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Fix & Perm; Life Technologies). Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) staining for apoptotic cells following manufacturer's protocol (Annexin-V-FLUOS Staining Kit, Roche). Samples were analyzed using LSRII (BD FACS DIVA software; BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).

VEGFC ELISA

The VEGFC protein expression in patient samples was measured in duplicates using a VEGFC ELISA (R&D Systems) following the manufacturer's protocol.

Compounds

VGX-100 is a human monoclonal VEGFC antibody (a kind gift from Vegenics Pty Ltd). VGX-100 binds to and precipitates all forms of VEGF-C in both the human and mouse.

CD34+ short-term and long-term culture assays

CD34+ cells were isolated using a MoFlo-XDP sorter (Beckman Coulter). After CD34 sorting, the CD34 percentages exceeded 95% in all samples.

Human short-term colony-forming cell assay.

A total of 1,000 CD34+ sorted mononuclear cells were cultured for 2 weeks in 1 mL methylcellulose (MethoCult H4435 Enriched, Stem Cell Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and experiment is performed in duplicate per patient sample.

Long-term culture-initiating cell assay.

CD34+ sorted blasts are cultured on MS5 mouse bone marrow stromal cells, in Gartner's media, αMEM (Thermo Fisher) containing 12.5% FCS, 12.5% horse serum (Thermo Fisher), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 57.2 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1 μmol/L hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), supplemented with 20 ng/mL trombopoietin (a kind gift from Kirin Brewery), IL3 (Gibco), and G-CSF (Invitrogen), and experiment is performed in duplicate per patient sample.

Long-term culture-initiating cell assay in limiting dilution.

Long-term culture-initiating cell (LTC-IC) assays plated at a density range (1/5/10/50/100/250/40,000/120,000 cells/well) were subjected to colony-forming cell (CFC) methylcellulose on top of the stroma (MS5) at week 5 of coculturing. Experiment is performed in 10-plo per density per patient sample.

Microscopy

Cytospins were stained with May–Grunwald–Giemsa. Images were taken with a Leica DM 3000 or Leica DM IL microscope with a Leica DFC420C camera (Leica Geosystems B.V.). Histologic analysis of the sternum (bone marrow) and spleens of AML-xenografted mice was outsourced to the Histology Core Facility of VIB, Leuven.

Western blot

Cells were lysed in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, incubated overnight with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table S2), washed, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescence. Phosphoproteome array (R&D Systems) analysis was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol, and data analysis and normalization were performed as previously described (7).

FLT3-ITD fragment analysis

FLT3 fragment length analysis by fluorescent labeling technology to establish the ratio of the mutant (ITD) FLT3 allele to the wild-type (WT) FLT3 allele. Ratios up to 0.5 are indicative for a heterozygous FLT3-ITD–mutant allele present in 100% of the AML cells [1 ITD peak/(1 ITD peak + 1 WT peak) = 0.5]. Newly diagnosed patients with AML harbor a heterozygous FLT3-ITD mutation in >92% of the cases (10).

Reversed phase protein array

Proteomic profiling was performed using newly diagnosed pediatric AML samples (n = 31) and CD34+ normal bone marrow (NBM) samples (n = 10) using reversed phase protein array (RPPA), as described previously (11).

Quantitative real-time PCR

FOXO3A, CD11b, and p21 mRNA expressions together with HPRT as a reference gene were analyzed in triplicates using SYBR Green qRT-PCR (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Relative mRNA expression from triplicates was determined using the ΔΔCt method (primer sequences in Supplementary Table S2).

AML xenografted in NOD-SCID/IL2γ−/− mice

NOD-SCID/IL2γ−/− (NSG) mice were purchased from Charles River. This animal study was approved by the ethical animal committee at KU Leuven (P262/2015). Animals received anti-VEGFC 40 mg/kg treatment twice a week via i.p. injections. Animals were injected with 106 primary AML cells i.v. white blood cell (WBC) counts were measured using a micro-semi C-reactive protein hematology analyzer (Axonlab).

Statistical analysis

Statistical package for the social science (SPSS 17) software was used for graphing box plots. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine differences between AML and NBM or two experimental groups of mice, and two-tailed Student t tests or a paired sample t test was used for analysis comparing untreated and treated AML cells based upon Levene test for equality of variance, and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to define significant differences between more than two groups.

Results

The VEGFC/KDR axis is selectively expressed by AML blasts

VEGFC is an important prognostic factor in AML supporting AML blast growth and apoptosis-evading signals (Supplementary Fig. S1A–S1C). The CD34+ and CD34− cell populations within primary AML patient samples expressed significantly higher levels of VEGFC as compared with NBM controls (Fig. 1A; Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.013). Associated to higher VEGFC expression, primary AML patient samples present elevated KDR membrane protein expression levels (Fig. 1A; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.001), whereas FLT-4 membrane protein expression was absent (Fig. 1A; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.381; ref. 7). In support of these data, VEGFC and KDR knockdown effects on the proliferation of AML cell lines were comparable (Supplementary Fig. S2A). Cell-cycle inhibitor p21 mRNA expression was significantly induced in anti–VEGFC-treated as well as VEGFC knockdown AML cells (Supplementary Fig. S2B). In addition, VEGFC-supporting effects on AML cell growth were suppressed in KDR-knockdown cells (Supplementary Fig. S2C). These findings challenged us to explore VEGFC (30 μg/mL) monoclonal antibody treatment effects on AML cell functions (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

VEGFC-targeted therapy in AML. A, VEGFC protein expression analysis using ELISA on NBM (n = 4) cells, CD34− AML cells (n = 3), and CD34+ AML cells (n = 5). Flow cytometry KDR (VEGFR-2) membrane protein expression levels of pediatric AML blasts (n = 60) and NBM (n = 5) controls. FLT4 (VEGFR-3) membrane protein expression levels on pediatric AML blasts (n = 18) and NBM (n = 5) controls. Box plots show the median, and error bars define data distribution. B, VEGFC targeting study approach to identify the molecular mechanism of action. C, May–Grunwald–Giemsa staining of THP-1 cells in the presence or absence of VEGFC-targeting human antibody (30 μg/mL). D, CD11b and CD14 membrane protein expression by flow cytometric analysis of THP-1–untreated and anti–VEGFC-treated cells (mean ± SEM). E, Flow cytometric dose-dependent apoptosis analysis of anti–VEGFC-treated THP-1 cells using Annexin V staining (mean ± SEM). F, Flow cytometric KDR membrane protein expression analysis upon VEGFC-targeting antibody treatment in THP-1 cells (mean ± SEM). Statistical analysis: *, P < 0.05.

VEGFC antibody therapy eliminates the expansion potential of CD34+ AML cells by enforcing myelocytic differentiation

In KDR-expressing AML cell line THP-1, VEGFC antibody therapy significantly induced myelocytic differentiation, supported by an increased population of cells that express differentiation markers CD11b and CD14 (Fig. 1C and D and Supplementary Fig. S3A; Student t test, both P < 0.05. In addition, VEGFC antibody therapy induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent matter (Fig. 1E). VEGFC antibody therapy reduced KDR membrane expression, which implicates an eradication of the VEGFC/KDR axis in these leukemic cells (Fig. 1F).

Next, VEGFC antibody therapy effect on CD34+ primary AML samples (Supplementary Fig. S3B and S3C) was examined in a variety of AML stem/progenitor cell assays. CFC assays (3D semisolid media) highlight a 25% reduction in four AML patient samples, and one AML patient sample showed decreased colony formation solely after serial replate (Fig. 2A, combining all performed CD34+ AML patient CFC assays, Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.0192). VEGFC antibody therapy–suppressive colony formation was supported by 35% lower total CFC cell counts in all AML samples (Fig. 2A; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.0028). In LTC-IC assays (3D coculture assay), VEGFC antibody therapy decreased the outgrowth of CD34+ AML cells in 6 of the 7 AML patient samples, overall reducing the LTC-IC outgrowth by 28% (Fig. 2B; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.003). Although LTC-IC assay outgrowth was reduced by VEGFC antibody therapy, LTC-IC cultures were retained in the presence of VEGFC antibody therapy. Limiting dilution LTC-IC assays revealed a further decrease up to 49% in the CD34+-initiating leukemic cell outgrowth potential in the presence of anti-VEGFC (Fig. 2C and D; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.003). Morphologic analysis revealed VEGFC antibody therapy–induced myelocytic differentiation that appeared already after 1 week of treatment (Fig. 2E and F).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

VEGFC-targeting therapy effects on CD34+ AML stem and progenitor cells. A, CFC assay analysis of CD34+ pediatric AML cells using a single dose of VEGFC antibody treatment representing the number CFC colonies (left) and the total CFC cell counts (right; n = 6). B, CD34+ AML expansion potential in LTC-IC assay after 7 weeks of AML culturing on a mouse stromal feeder layer (n = 7). C, CD34+ AML expansion potential of cobblestone-forming cells residing underneath the stromal layer after 5 weeks of culturing, measured in limiting dilutions by their CFC output potential (n = 5). D, CFC, LTC-IC, and LTC-IC in limiting dilution represented per AML patient sample. E, Representative May–Grunwald–Giemsa-stained cytospins of untreated VEGFC antibody–treated CD34+ AML samples in CFC and LTC-IC assays. F, Microscopic quantification of AML cell culture composition after LTC-IC assays analysis comparing untreated and anti–VEGFC-treated cultures (n = 7). G, Box plot presenting the mean percentage of myelomonocytic cells quantified from May–Grunwald–Giemsa-stained cytospins comparing untreated and anti–VEGFC-treated cultures. H, Flow cytometry confirmation of anti–VEGFC-induced myelomonocytic differentiation in CD34+ AML CFC and LTC-IC assays by CD38, CD34, CD11b, and CD14 membrane protein expression analysis. I, Flow cytometric Annexin V/PI apoptosis analysis of untreated and anti–VEGFC-treated CD34+ AML CFC and LTC-IC cultures. All box plots represent the median, and error bars define data distribution. Statistical analysis: *, P < 0.05.

Besides an overall 28% reduction in the outgrowth of VEGFC antibody–treated CD34+ AML blasts, a significant 3.3-fold induction of differentiation along the myelocytic lineage could be appreciated in LTC-IC assays (Fig. 2G; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.001). Differentiation marker analysis confirmed that increasing percentages of cells stained positive for CD38, CD11b, and CD14 or CD15 cells in liquid cultures, CFC assays, and LTC-IC assays as compared with untreated controls (Fig. 2H and Supplementary Fig. S3D and S3E), whereas CD34 percentages were decreased. In addition, VEGFC antibody–treated cultures presented increased percentages of apoptotic cells (Fig. 2I and Supplementary Fig. S3D).

VEGFC antibody therapy–targeted myelomonocytic differentiation of the leukemic clone

FLT3-ITD fragment analysis showed identical ratios of heterozygous FLT3-ITD–mutant cells in untreated and VEGFC antibody–treated cultures in CFC and LTC-IC assays (Supplementary Table S3), supporting that anti-VEGFC treatment affects the leukemic clone. Although the FLT3-ITD leukemic cells were affected by VEGFC antibody–enforced myelomonocytic differentiation, the cellular responses for FLT3-WT AML samples were superior to the FLT3-ITD AML samples (Supplementary Fig. S4A; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.042). VEGFC antibody therapy of control CD34+ NBM cultures presented an approximate 3- to 4-week latency in myelocytic lineage skewing as compared with AML CD34+ cells (Supplementary Fig. S4B and S4C). Overall, these findings highlight that VEGFC antibody treatment is a novel new differentiation therapy, which targets the leukemic clonogenic capacity of CD34+ AML blasts.

VEGFC antibody therapy–targeted downstream MEK1/2-Erk1/2 phosphorylation in AML blasts

As a first approach to define VEGFC downstream targets, we analyzed phosphoproteome arrays of three independent untreated and VEGFC antibody–treated AML samples. Phosphorylation of MEK1/2 (S218/S222, S222/S226), AMPKα2 (T172), HSP27 (S78/S82), paxillin (Y118), STAT2 (Y689), and STAT5b (Y699) was significantly reduced in anti–VEGFC-treated AML samples (Fig. 3A, paired sample t test, mean ± SEM; *, P < 0.05). Decreased phosphorylation of specifically ERK1/2 was confirmed by immunoblot analysis, and STAT5a/b was reduced in some cases in anti–VEGFC-treated CD34+ AML samples, and not in CD34+ NBM (Fig. 3B; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.008 for Erk, and P = 0.151 for STAT5). In the previously performed LTC-IC assays in limiting dilutions, we observed a loss of erythropoiesis in some but not all AML patient samples, which is supported by reduced STAT5 phosphorylation. Although reduced levels of Erk1/2 phosphorylation can explain a potential drop in expansion potential of the AML blasts by VEGFC antibody therapy, these findings cannot explain the induction of myelomonocytic differentiation (7).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Identification of anti–VEGFC-targeting mechanisms in pediatric AML and potential bypass mechanism. A, Phosphoprotein array analysis presented as VEGFC antibody targeting effects relative to untreated control CD34+ AML samples (n = 3; mean ± SEM). B, Immunoblot confirmation of anti-VEGFC treatment effects on MAPK/Erk, and STAT5 protein expression and phosphorylation in pediatric CD34+ AML samples, CD34+ NBM controls, and THP-1 cells. Left, immunoblots. Right, combined quantification of the presented immunoblots. Box plots show the median, and error bars define data distribution. C, Flow cytometry VEGFC and KDR protein expression analysis combined with RPPA array analysis in CD34+ pediatric AML samples. The Venn diagram shows significantly overlapping protein expression. Bold proteins show a positive correlation, and nonbold proteins presented a negative correlation. All shown proteins were analyzed by RPPA analysis except the ones that are described to be analyzed by flow cytometry. D, FOXO3A immunoblot analysis of THP-1 cells treated for 72 hours with anti-VEGFC. Intracellular protein expression as measured by flow cytometry analysis of 24-hour anti–VEGFC-treated primary AML samples and THP-1 cells. E, Scrambled control vector and FOXO3A constitutive overexpressing THP-1 cells in the presence or absence of VEGFC antibody treatment analyzed for CD11b membrane protein expression levels measured using flow cytometry analysis (mean ± SEM). Statistical analysis: *, P < 0.05.

VEGFC antibody therapy induced myelomonocytic differentiation via FOXO3A suppression

Next, we combined flow cytometry VEGFC and KDR protein expression analysis together with RPPA analysis of the same set of pediatric AML samples. The VEGFC/KDR protein association network showed strong significant overlapping correlations for CCND3, LGALS3, FOXO3 (S318/321), PRKCD (S645), KIT, LSD1, NPM1, EIF2AK2, PTPN11, SSBP2, and STAT5A/B (Fig. 3C, Pearson correlations, all P < 0.05).

FOXO3 suppression is described to mediate differentiation of the AML blasts (12). In line with previous reports in adult AML samples, the basal and phosphorylated FOXO3A protein expression levels were significantly increased in pediatric AML as compared with CD34+ NBM samples (Supplementary Fig. S4D; Student t test, both P < 0.001; ref. 13). Immunoblot and flow cytometry analysis revealed that FOXO3A protein expression was decreased upon VEGFC antibody treatment in THP-1 cells and primary AML samples (Fig. 3D). To define whether VEGFC antibody therapy–induced myelomonocytic differentiation was facilitated via its suppression of FOXO3A, we generated THP-1 FOXO3A overexpression cells. Constitutive FOXO3A overexpression was shown to rescue the anti–VEGFC-induced expression of CD11b in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3E and Supplementary Fig. S4E and S4F, Student t test, 30 μg/mL and P = 0.027; 60 μg/mL and P = 0.019). These findings implicate that anti–VEGFC-induced differentiation of leukemic cells was enforced via the suppression of FOXO3A.

VEGFC antibody therapy reduced splenic AML infiltration and induced myelomonocytic differentiation in an AML xenograft animal model

To investigate the in vivo VEGFC-targeting efficacy, we injected a primary AML patient sample (EVI1 ASXL1) into NSG mice that progressively developed leukemias. These patient-derived AML xenografted mice were treated with DMSO or VEGFC antibody therapy. Leukemia was presented by increased WBC counts in the peripheral blood of these animals. The WBC counts were significantly reduced by VEGFC antibody therapy (Fig. 4A; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.014). Upon disease progression, histologic bone marrow examination showed that the human AML blast population was only slightly reduced in VEGFC antibody–treated animals (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Fig. S5; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.127). In the bone marrow, we observed a significant induction of eosinophilic compartment in VEGFC antibody–treated mice, supported by elevated levels of human CD11b expression (Fig. 4B and C; Mann–Whitney U test, histology P = 0.046, and flow cytometry P = 0.007). The spleens of VEGFC antibody–treated human PDX AML mice showed a minor decrease in size (Fig. 4D). When focusing on spleen infiltration of human xenografted AML cells, histologic examinations revealed a significant reduction in the amount of AML blasts that localized to the spleens in VEGFC antibody–treated mice (Fig. 4D; Supplementary Fig. S5; Mann–Whitney U test, P = 0.011). The overall in vivo efficacy of VEGFC antibody treatment was characterized by a modest reduction in human PDX AML blast homing to the bone marrow of NSG mice, leading to a stronger decrease in human PDX AML engraftment to secondary AML sites as the spleen, where we observed an approximately 50% reduction of human AML blasts. Taken together, this in vivo study shows that VEGFC antibody therapy suppresses the AML progression in vivo via the induction of differentiation.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

VEGFC antibody therapy induced differentiation in a primary AML-xenografted animal model. A, The WBC counts in the peripheral blood of mice injected with a primary EVI1 ASXL1 AML sample comparing DMSO with VEGFC antibody–treated animals. B and D, Histologic analysis was performed on bone marrow and spleens of disease progressed animals using a semiquantitative scoring system, e.g., 0 = no infiltration, 1 < 25% infiltration, 2 = 25%–75% infiltration, and 3 > 75% infiltration. DMSO-treated animals were compared with VEGFC antibody–treated animals. B, Left, box plot presents the AML blast infiltration in the bone marrow. Right, box plot shows the infiltration of the AML-derived eosinophilic compartment in bone marrow. C, The box plot represents flow cytometric analysis showing the percentage of human CD11b membrane protein expression in the bone marrow of the AML-xenografted mice with on the right side the flow cytometry plots of the individual mice. D, Left, spleen lengths. Middle, histologic analysis of the AML blast infiltration in the spleen. Right, AML-derived eosinophilic compartment in the spleen. All box plots represent the median, and error bars define data distribution. Statistical analysis: *, P < 0.05.

Discussion

VEGFC has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor and showed to interfere with AML survival in vivo and ex vivo (5, 8, 9). Our study highlights VEGFC-targeted treatment as potential new differentiation therapy in AML. This study is one of the few that showed potent differentiation of the CD34+ leukemic clone by VEGFC-targeting antibody therapy in vitro and in vivo. The modest VEGFC antibody therapy–mediated reduction of AML blasts in the bone marrow of NSG mice in vivo underscores the supportive therapeutic potential of VEGFC-targeting differentiation therapy in addition to conventional treatment regimens for patients with AML. ATRA is a differentiation therapy available as conventional therapy in the clinic, applied to all patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) that harbor the PML-RARA fusion protein. This differentiation therapy significantly improved the outcome of APL (14, 15). More recently, the IDH2 inhibitor Enasidenib was approved in the clinics as new differentiation therapy of IDH2-mutant AMLs (16).

VEGFC targeting antibody therapy is currently under investigation in a phase I clinical trial in combination with Bevacizumab (VEGFA-targeting antibody) for advanced solid tumors using a maximum dosage of 20 mg/kg, which showed to be well tolerated (NCT01514123), and final results should be available soon. VEGFC-targeting antibody therapy in mice was previously shown using daily dosage of 20 mg/kg, which was well tolerated (17, 18). In our study, VEGFC-targeting antibody therapy at 40 mg/kg twice weekly in NSG mice did not affect the animal body weight nor showed aberrant histology of organs, and was therefore well tolerated.

Notably, we found that VEGFC antibody treatment blocked the erythroid outgrowth of 2 of 5 patient samples in long-term CD34+ AML cultures, which can be caused by the inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation that is known to guide erythropoiesis (19, 20). Evidence of similar effects should be paid attention to in the ongoing clinical trial of this compound. The VEGFC-targeting therapeutic approach might be useful for other cancer subtypes as well, as for example high VEGFC expression levels have been shown to modulate the breast cancer–metastasizing capacity (4).

Our study describes that VEGFC-mediated FOXO3A levels are important for the preservation of immature AML blasts. Interactions between AMPKα2 and FOXO3A have previously been described (21). We speculate that the decreased levels of AMPKα2 protein phosphorylation by VEGFC antibody treatment may be the key substrate for FOXO3A to control AML cell fate. So far, our findings indicate an important regulatory function for VEGFC in CD34+ AML cell fate decisions. Anti-VEGFC therapy enforced CD34+ AML blast myelocytic differentiation by FOXO3A suppression, creating new opportunities for differentiation therapy besides high-dose chemotherapy in AML.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: K.R. Kampen, E.S.J.M. De Bont

Development of methodology: K.R. Kampen, H. Mahmud, E.S.J.M. De Bont

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): K.R. Kampen, H. Mahmud, A.B. Mulder, H.J.M.P. Verhagen, L. Smit, S.M. Kornblau, E.S.J.M. De Bont

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): K.R. Kampen, F.J.G. Scherpen, A.B. Mulder, V. Guryev, S.M. Kornblau, E.S.J.M. De Bont

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: K.R. Kampen, H. Mahmud, K.D. Keersmaecker, S.M. Kornblau, E.S.J.M. De Bont

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): F.J.G. Scherpen, A.B. Mulder, V. Guryev, L. Smit

Study supervision: A. ter Elst, K.D. Keersmaecker, E.S.J.M. De Bont

Other (performed experiments): H. Mahmud

Acknowledgments

We thank Megan E. Baldwin and Robert Klupacs from Vegenics for their generous supply of anti-VEGFC treatment reagent (VGX-100). We thank Kirin Brewery for providing TPO used in LTC-IC assays. Henk Moes, Roelof Jan van der Lei, and Geert Mesander assisted in cell sorting. J.J. Schuringa provided the MS5 feeder cell line. We thank Bart-Jan Wierenga for the lentiviral shRNA plasmid. The authors would like to thank the patients who donated leukemia specimens and nurse practitioners and clinicians who acquired specimens. The authors thank Hein Schepers for sharing the FOXO3A overexpression plasmid.

K.R. Kampen was supported by a PhD grant from the Foundation for Pediatric Oncology Groningen, the Netherlands (SKOG, 12001); animal experiments were granted by Foundation Beatrix Children's Hospital (2014 to K.R. Kampen); a subsequent grant was received from the Jan Kornelis de Cock Stichting (project code 2015-43 to K.R. Kampen); and a postdoctoral fellowship was received from Lady Tata Memorial Trust International Award for Research in Leukaemia (2016–2017). A. ter Elst and H. Mahmud shared the KiKa grant for the kinomics/proteomics AML project (2010-57 to E.S.J.M. de Bont and S.M. Kornblau).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received January 24, 2018.
  • Revision received August 6, 2018.
  • Accepted August 28, 2018.
  • Published first September 5, 2018.
  • ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Linden P,
    3. Farnebo J,
    4. Cao R,
    5. Eriksson A,
    6. Kumar V,
    7. et al.
    Vascular endothelial growth factor C induces angiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998;95:14389–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chien MH,
    2. Ku CC,
    3. Johansson G,
    4. Chen MW,
    5. Hsiao M,
    6. Su JL,
    7. et al.
    Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) promotes angiogenesis by induction of COX-2 in leukemic cells via the VEGF-R3/JNK/AP-1 pathway. Carcinogenesis 2009;30:2005–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hamada K,
    2. Oike Y,
    3. Takakura N,
    4. Ito Y,
    5. Jussila L,
    6. Dumont DJ,
    7. et al.
    VEGF-C signaling pathways through VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 in vasculoangiogenesis and hematopoiesis. Blood 2000;96:3793–800.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Skobe M,
    2. Hawighorst T,
    3. Jackson DG,
    4. Prevo R,
    5. Janes L,
    6. Velasco P,
    7. et al.
    Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nat Med 2001;7:192–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dias S,
    2. Choy M,
    3. Alitalo K,
    4. Rafii S.
    Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C signaling through FLT-4 (VEGFR-3) mediates leukemic cell proliferation, survival, and resistance to chemotherapy. Blood 2002;99:2179–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fielder W,
    2. Graeven U,
    3. Ergun S,
    4. Verago S,
    5. Kilic N,
    6. Stockschläder M,
    7. et al.
    Expression of FLT4 and its ligand VEGF-C in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 1997;11:1234–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kampen KR,
    2. ter Elst A,
    3. Mahmud H,
    4. Scherpen FJ,
    5. Diks SH,
    6. Peppelenbosch MP,
    7. et al.
    Insights in dynamic kinome reprogramming as a consequence of MEK inhibition in MLL-rearranged AML. Leukemia 2014;28:589–99.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. de Jonge HJ,
    2. Valk PJ,
    3. Veeger NJ,
    4. ter Elst A,
    5. den Boer ML,
    6. Cloos J,
    7. et al.
    High VEGFC expression is associated with unique gene expression profiles and predicts adverse prognosis in pediatric and adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2010;116:1747–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. de Jonge HJ,
    2. Weidenaar AC,
    3. ter Elst A,
    4. Boezen HM,
    5. Scherpen FJ,
    6. Bouma-Ter Steege JC,
    7. et al.
    Endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression is associated with decreased drug responsiveness in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:924–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schnittger S,
    2. Bacher U,
    3. Kern W,
    4. Alpermann T,
    5. Haferlach C,
    6. Haferlach T
    . Prognostic impact of FLT3-ITD load in NPM1 mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2011;25:1297–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kornblau SM,
    2. Tibes R,
    3. Qiu YH,
    4. Chen W,
    5. Kantarjian HM,
    6. Andreeff M,
    7. et al.
    Functional proteomic profiling of AML predicts response and survival. Blood 2009;113:154–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sykes SM,
    2. Lane SW,
    3. Bullinger L,
    4. Kalaitzidis D,
    5. Yusuf R,
    6. Saez B,
    7. et al.
    AKT/FOXO signaling enforces reversible differentiation blockade in myeloid leukemias. Cell 2011;146:697–708.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Coombes KR
    1. Kornblau SM,
    2. Singh N,
    3. Qiu Y,
    4. Chen W,
    5. Zhang N
    Coombes KR . Highly phosphorylated FOXO3A is an adverse prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res 2010;16:1865–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tallman MS,
    2. Andersen JW,
    3. Schiffer CA,
    4. Appelbaum FR,
    5. Feusner JH,
    6. Ogden A,
    7. et al.
    All-trans-retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1997:337:1021–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fenaux P,
    2. Le Deley MC,
    3. Castaigne S,
    4. Archimbaud E,
    5. Chomienne C,
    6. Link H,
    7. et al.
    Effect of all transretinoic acid in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Results of a multicenter randomized trial. European APL 91 Group. Blood 1993;82:3241–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Stein EM,
    2. DiNardo CD,
    3. Pollyea DA,
    4. Fathi AT,
    5. Roboz GJ,
    6. Altman JK,
    7. et al.
    Enasidenib in mutant-IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2017;130:722–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Goyal S,
    2. Chauhan SK,
    3. Dana R
    . Blockade of prolymphangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor C in dry eye disease. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:84–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hajrasouliha AR,
    2. Funaki T,
    3. Sadrai Z,
    4. Hattori T,
    5. Chauhan SK,
    6. Dana R
    . Vascular endothelial growth factor-C promotes alloimmunity by amplifying antigen-presenting cell maturation and lymphangiogenesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:1244–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Shimizu R,
    2. Engel JD,
    3. Yamamoto M
    . GATA1-related leukaemias. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:279–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Wierenga AT,
    2. Vellenga E,
    3. Schuring JJ
    . Down-regulation of GATA1 uncouples STAT5-induced erythroid differentiation from stem/progenitor cell proliferation. Blood 2010;115:4367–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Banko MR,
    2. Allen JJ,
    3. Schaffer BE,
    4. Wilker EW,
    5. Tsou P,
    6. White JL,
    7. et al.
    Chemical genetic screen for AMPKα2 substrates uncovers a network of proteins involved in mitosis. Mol Cell 2011;44:878–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Research: 78 (20)
October 2018
Volume 78, Issue 20
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
VEGFC Antibody Therapy Drives Differentiation of AML
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
VEGFC Antibody Therapy Drives Differentiation of AML
Kim R. Kampen, Frank J.G. Scherpen, Hasan Mahmud, Arja ter Elst, André B. Mulder, Victor Guryev, Han J.M.P. Verhagen, Kim De Keersmaecker, Linda Smit, Steven M. Kornblau and Eveline S.J.M. De Bont
Cancer Res October 15 2018 (78) (20) 5940-5948; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0250

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
VEGFC Antibody Therapy Drives Differentiation of AML
Kim R. Kampen, Frank J.G. Scherpen, Hasan Mahmud, Arja ter Elst, André B. Mulder, Victor Guryev, Han J.M.P. Verhagen, Kim De Keersmaecker, Linda Smit, Steven M. Kornblau and Eveline S.J.M. De Bont
Cancer Res October 15 2018 (78) (20) 5940-5948; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0250
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Development of Small-Molecule Inhibitors to HuR
  • Implication of Gut Microbes in Response to Trastuzumab Therapy
  • Schwann Cell–Derived Galectin-3 Participates in CIPN Onset
Show more Translational Science
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook  Twitter  LinkedIn  YouTube  RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Meeting Abstracts

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Research Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Cancer Research Print ISSN: 0008-5472
Journal of Cancer Research ISSN: 0099-7013
American Journal of Cancer ISSN: 0099-7374

Advertisement